Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Changes in Handling Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches, 38696-38698 [2010-16342]
Download as PDF
38696
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
date to 5 years from the date of this final
rule. As conveyed in the discussion at
the NOSB meeting, the exemption for
tetracycline has remained divisive and
the NOSB did not want to extend the
listing for another 5 years. Peracetic acid
and copper fungicides were specifically
mentioned as alternative substances for
fire blight control, although these were
noted as only partially or marginally
effective. This is consistent with a
comment to the proposed rule which
acknowledged that Bordeaux mix
(copper sulfate and lime) and other
copper formulations sprayed at greentip stage provide some protection, but
can cause fruit scarring and are
phytotoxic to some cultivars. It was
noted anecdotally at the NOSB meeting
that there are apple and pear varieties
with limited resistance to fire blight and
that some producers are growing pears
without the use of tetracycline for the
organic market in the European Union,
where the use of antibiotics for organic
crop production is not permitted.
Based on all public comment and
documentation received, the NOP
believes that issues regarding the
availability and viability of alternatives
to tetracycline for fire blight control
remain outstanding. At the same time,
we note the NOSB’s recommendation to
only allow the continued use of
tetracycline for fire blight control until
October 21, 2012. Though some
commenters have requested the removal
of the expiration date from use of
tetracycline, the NOP recommends that
such interested parties petition the
NOSB, using the petition process
outlined in 72 FR 2167 (January 18,
2007), to have the expiration date
removed from the authorized use of the
substance.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Classification of Tetracycline as a
Bactericide
One comment asserted that
oxytetracycline calcium complex was
naturally produced in the soil by
bacterial fermentation and therefore it is
not an antibiotic, but a bactericide. This
comment argued for the approval of the
use of ‘‘natural’’ oxytetracycline to be
extended indefinitely for organic
production so that the organic apple and
pear industry would not be lost to fire
blight. The comment did not provide
evidence to affirm that the entire
production of oxytetracycline to its
commercial form would qualify as
nonsynthetic (natural) in accordance
with the NOP regulations. Tetracycline,
in technical literature and common use,
is universally identified as an antibiotic.
While tetracycline is derived from
bacteria and has bactericidal properties,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
we believe that ‘‘antibiotic’’ is the proper
and accurate classification.
On-Site Rather Than On-Farm
Generation of Sulfurous Acid
One of the comments expressed
support for the addition of sulfurous
acid, but requested that the annotation
to refer to on-site generation instead of
on-farm, because ‘‘farm’’ is not defined
in the NOP regulation or in the Organic
Food Production Act (OFPA), and use of
that word could cause confusion in the
organic industry. We recognize that
there was considerable discussion over
the precise wording to use in the
annotation to capture the intent that it
be produced at the location where the
sulfurous acid would be used to prevent
the use of sulfurous acid in forms that
would be synthetically stabilized or
preserved for shipping. Both terms,
‘‘farm’’ and ‘‘site’’, appear in the NOP
regulations. However, we believe these
are distinct, as farm refers specifically to
land area in crop production, while
‘‘site’’ can refer to production or
handling areas. We believe that ‘‘farm’’ is
readily understood by the organic
industry and is the more appropriate,
specific term in this annotation.
F. Effective Date
This final rule reflects
recommendations submitted to the
Secretary by the NOSB. The revisions
being made in the listing of one
exempted substance and the substance
being added to the National List were
based on petitions from the industry
and evaluated by the NOSB using
criteria in the Act and the regulations.
Because these revisions and the
exemption have been subject to
extensive discussion and comments and
are considered vital to the most efficient
organic crop production, NOP believes
that producers should be able to use
them in their operations as soon as
possible. In crop production, the
effective period for use of any practice
or crop input may be limited by the
progress of the growing season, and the
utility of an exempted substance for
organic production in any one year is
dependent upon that substance being
available when it is needed for use, as
its use may be quite ineffective at any
other time in the growing season.
Accordingly, AMS finds that good cause
exists under 5 U.S.C. 553 (d)(3) for not
postponing the effective date of this rule
until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 205
Administrative practice and
procedure, Agriculture, Animals,
Archives and records, Imports, Labeling,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Organically produced products, Plants,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seals and insignia, Soil
conservation.
■ For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 205 is amended as
follows:
PART 205–NATIONAL ORGANIC
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 205 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6522.
2. § 205.601 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (i)(11).
B. Adding new paragraph (j)(9).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed
for use in organic crop production.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(11) Tetracycline, for fire blight
control only and for use only until
October 21, 2012.
(j) * * *
(9) Sulfurous acid (CAS # 7782–99–2)
for on-farm generation of substance
utilizing 99% purity elemental sulfur
per paragraph (j)(2) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–16335 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–09–0090; FV10–916/917–
1 FIR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in
California; Changes in Handling
Requirements for Fresh Nectarines
and Peaches
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that changed the handling
requirements applicable to well matured
fruit covered under the nectarine and
peach marketing orders (orders). The
interim rule updated the lists of
commercially significant varieties
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
subject to size regulations under the
orders. The interim rule was necessary
to revise the regulations for the current
marketing season, which began in April.
DATES: Effective July 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
L. Simmons, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906; or E-mail:
Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by
viewing a guide at the following Web
site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide;
or by contacting Antoinette Carter,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order Nos.
916 and 917, both as amended (7 CFR
parts 916 and 917), regulating the
handling of nectarines and peaches
grown in California, respectively,
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘orders.’’
The orders are effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The shipping of ‘‘well-matured’’
nectarines and peaches grown in
California is regulated by 7 CFR parts
916 and 917, respectively. Among other
things, certain varieties of fruit are
subject to variety-specific size
restrictions. The lists of commerciallysignificant varieties so regulated are
updated regularly as the volume of new
varieties increases and as older varieties
become obsolete. The sizes of varieties
not subject to variety-specific
regulations are regulated under generic
regulations contained in the orders.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on April 5, 2010, and
effective on April 6, 2010, (75 FR 17027,
Doc. No AMS–FV–09–0090, FV10–916/
917–1 IFR), §§ 916.356 and 917.459
were amended by adding ten nectarine
varieties and eight peach varieties to the
lists of commercially-significant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
varieties that are subject to varietyspecific size regulations under the
orders. Additionally, twelve nectarine
varieties and eleven peach varieties
were removed from the variety-specific
size regulations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
action on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
Industry Information
There are approximately 101
California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders,
and approximately 475 producers of
these fruits in California. Small
agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, are defined by the
Small Business Administration (SBA)
(13 CFR 121.201) as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,000,000 and
small agricultural producers are defined
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000. A majority of these
handlers and producers may be
classified as small entities.
For the 2009 season, the committees’
staff estimated that the average handler
price received was $11.50 per container
or container equivalent of nectarines or
peaches. A handler would have to ship
at least 608,696 containers to have
annual receipts of $7,000,000. Given
data on shipments maintained by the
committees’ staff and the average
handler price received during the 2009
season, the committees’ staff estimates
that small handlers represent
approximately 50 percent of all the
handlers within the industry.
For the 2009 season, the committees’
staff estimated the average producer
price received was $6.50 per container
or container equivalent for nectarines
and peaches. A producer would have to
produce at least 115,385 containers of
nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data
maintained by the committees’ staff and
the average producer price received
during the 2009 season, the committees’
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38697
staff estimates that more than 80 percent
of the producers within the industry
would be considered small producers.
Under authority provided in §§ 916.52
and 917.41 of the orders, grade, size,
maturity, pack, and container marking
requirements are established for fresh
shipments of California nectarines and
peaches, respectively. Such
requirements are in effect on a
continuing basis.
Sections 916.356 and 917.459 of the
orders’ rules and regulations establish
minimum sizes for various varieties of
nectarines and peaches. This rule
continues in effect the action that
adjusted the minimum fruit sizes
authorized for certain varieties of each
commodity for the 2010 season.
Minimum size regulations are put in
place to encourage producers to leave
fruit on the trees for a longer period of
time, increasing both maturity and fruit
size. Increased fruit size increases the
number of packed containers per acre
and, coupled with heightened maturity
levels, also provides greater consumer
satisfaction, which in turn fosters repeat
purchases that benefit producers and
handlers alike.
Annual adjustments to minimum
sizes of nectarines and peaches, such as
these, are recommended by the
committees based upon historical data,
producer and handler information
regarding sizes attained by different
varieties, and trends in consumer
purchases.
An alternative to such action would
include not establishing minimum size
regulations for these new varieties. Such
an action, however, would be a
significant departure from the
committees’ past practices and represent
a significant change in the regulations as
they currently exist. For these reasons,
this alternative was not recommended.
The committees make
recommendations regarding the
revisions in handling requirements after
considering all available information,
including comments received by
committee staff. At the meetings, the
impact of and alternatives to these
recommendations are deliberated. The
committees consist of individual
producers and handlers with many
years of experience in the industry and
are familiar with industry practices and
trends. All committee meetings are open
to the public and comments are widely
solicited. In addition, minutes of all
meetings are distributed to committee
members and others who have
requested them, and are also available
on the committees’ Web site, thereby
increasing the availability of this critical
information within the industry.
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES_PART 1
38698
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Regarding the impact of this action on
the affected entities, both large and
small entities are expected to benefit
from the changes, and the costs of
compliance are not expected to be
significantly different between large and
small entities.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
nectarine or peach handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies. In
addition, as stated in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this rule.
Further, the committees’ meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
nectarine and peach industry and all
interested parties were invited to attend
the meetings and participate in
Committee deliberations. The
committees have appointed a number of
joint subcommittees to review certain
issues and make recommendations to
the committees. The Compliance
Subcommittee met on November 3,
2009, and discussed this issue in detail.
Their recommendations were presented
at the meetings of both committees on
December 10, 2009. Like all committee
meetings, the November 3, 2009 and
December 10, 2009, meetings were
public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before June
4, 2010. No comments were received.
Therefore, for the reasons given in the
interim rule, we are adopting the
interim rule as a final rule, without
change.
To view the interim rule, go to:
https://www.regulations.gov/search/
Regs/home.html#
documentDetail?R=0900006480acfc3e.
This action also affirms information
contained in the interim rule concerning
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44
U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, it is found that
finalizing the interim rule, without
change, as published in the Federal
Register (75 FR 17027, April 5, 2010)
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:41 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PARTS 916 AND 917—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the interim rule that
amended 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 and
that was published at 75 FR 17027 on
April 5, 2010, is adopted as a final rule,
without change.
■
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–16342 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 948
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–08–0115; FV09–948–2
FIR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado;
Relaxation of Handling Regulation for
Area No. 3
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
rule that relaxed the size requirement
prescribed under the Colorado potato
marketing order. The interim rule
provided for the handling of all varieties
of potatoes with a minimum diameter of
3⁄4 inch, if the potatoes otherwise meet
U.S. No. 1 grade. This change is
intended to provide potato handlers
with greater marketing flexibility,
producers with increased returns, and
consumers with a greater supply of
potatoes.
DATES: Effective July 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or E-mail:
Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Small businesses may obtain
information on complying with this and
other marketing order and agreement
regulations by viewing a guide at the
following Web site: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
ams.fetchTemplateData.
do?template=Template
N&page=Marketing
OrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by
contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237;
Telephone: (202) 720–2491, Fax: (202)
720–8938, or E-mail: Antoinette.Carter
@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 97 and Order No. 948, both as
amended (7 CFR part 948), regulating
the handling of Irish potatoes grown in
Colorado, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
The handling of Irish potatoes grown
in Colorado is regulated by 7 CFR part
948. Prior to this change, the regulations
for Colorado Area No. 3 potatoes
provided that U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes,
17⁄8 inches minimum diameter or 4
ounces minimum weight, and Size B
potatoes (11⁄2 to 21⁄4 inches in diameter),
if U.S. No. 1 grade or better, may be
handled.
The Committee believes that in recent
years consumer demand has been
increasing for smaller potatoes which
often command premium prices. The
market for these smaller potatoes was
primarily supplied by potato production
areas outside Colorado Area No. 3.
Having the ability to handle smaller
potatoes enables Colorado Area No. 3
potato handlers to market a larger
portion of their crop while satisfying
consumer demand for smaller potatoes.
Therefore, this rule continues in effect
the rule that relaxed the size
requirement for all varieties of Colorado
Area No. 3 potatoes by allowing the
handling of potatoes with a minimum
diameter of 3⁄4 inch, if the potatoes
otherwise meet U.S. No. 1 Grade.
In an interim rule published in the
Federal Register on April 5, 2010, and
effective on April 6, 2010, (75 FR 17034,
Doc. No. AMS–FV–08–0115, FV09–948–
2 IFR), § 948.387, paragraph (a) was
revised.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\06JYR1.SGM
06JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 6, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38696-38698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16342]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-09-0090; FV10-916/917-1 FIR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Changes in Handling
Requirements for Fresh Nectarines and Peaches
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule that changed the handling
requirements applicable to well matured fruit covered under the
nectarine and peach marketing orders (orders). The interim rule updated
the lists of commercially significant varieties
[[Page 38697]]
subject to size regulations under the orders. The interim rule was
necessary to revise the regulations for the current marketing season,
which began in April.
DATES: Effective July 7, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry L. Simmons, Marketing
Specialist, or Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559)
487-5906; or E-mail: Jerry.Simmons@ams.usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may obtain information on complying with this and
other marketing order regulations by viewing a guide at the following
Web site: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide; or by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
Nos. 916 and 917, both as amended (7 CFR parts 916 and 917), regulating
the handling of nectarines and peaches grown in California,
respectively, hereinafter referred to as the ``orders.'' The orders are
effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
The shipping of ``well-matured'' nectarines and peaches grown in
California is regulated by 7 CFR parts 916 and 917, respectively. Among
other things, certain varieties of fruit are subject to variety-
specific size restrictions. The lists of commercially-significant
varieties so regulated are updated regularly as the volume of new
varieties increases and as older varieties become obsolete. The sizes
of varieties not subject to variety-specific regulations are regulated
under generic regulations contained in the orders.
In an interim rule published in the Federal Register on April 5,
2010, and effective on April 6, 2010, (75 FR 17027, Doc. No AMS-FV-09-
0090, FV10-916/917-1 IFR), Sec. Sec. 916.356 and 917.459 were amended
by adding ten nectarine varieties and eight peach varieties to the
lists of commercially-significant varieties that are subject to
variety-specific size regulations under the orders. Additionally,
twelve nectarine varieties and eleven peach varieties were removed from
the variety-specific size regulations.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
Industry Information
There are approximately 101 California nectarine and peach handlers
subject to regulation under the orders, and approximately 475 producers
of these fruits in California. Small agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, are defined by the Small Business Administration
(SBA) (13 CFR 121.201) as those whose annual receipts are less than
$7,000,000 and small agricultural producers are defined as those having
annual receipts of less than $750,000. A majority of these handlers and
producers may be classified as small entities.
For the 2009 season, the committees' staff estimated that the
average handler price received was $11.50 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A handler would have to ship at
least 608,696 containers to have annual receipts of $7,000,000. Given
data on shipments maintained by the committees' staff and the average
handler price received during the 2009 season, the committees' staff
estimates that small handlers represent approximately 50 percent of all
the handlers within the industry.
For the 2009 season, the committees' staff estimated the average
producer price received was $6.50 per container or container equivalent
for nectarines and peaches. A producer would have to produce at least
115,385 containers of nectarines and peaches to have annual receipts of
$750,000. Given data maintained by the committees' staff and the
average producer price received during the 2009 season, the committees'
staff estimates that more than 80 percent of the producers within the
industry would be considered small producers.
Under authority provided in Sec. Sec. 916.52 and 917.41 of the
orders, grade, size, maturity, pack, and container marking requirements
are established for fresh shipments of California nectarines and
peaches, respectively. Such requirements are in effect on a continuing
basis.
Sections 916.356 and 917.459 of the orders' rules and regulations
establish minimum sizes for various varieties of nectarines and
peaches. This rule continues in effect the action that adjusted the
minimum fruit sizes authorized for certain varieties of each commodity
for the 2010 season. Minimum size regulations are put in place to
encourage producers to leave fruit on the trees for a longer period of
time, increasing both maturity and fruit size. Increased fruit size
increases the number of packed containers per acre and, coupled with
heightened maturity levels, also provides greater consumer
satisfaction, which in turn fosters repeat purchases that benefit
producers and handlers alike.
Annual adjustments to minimum sizes of nectarines and peaches, such
as these, are recommended by the committees based upon historical data,
producer and handler information regarding sizes attained by different
varieties, and trends in consumer purchases.
An alternative to such action would include not establishing
minimum size regulations for these new varieties. Such an action,
however, would be a significant departure from the committees' past
practices and represent a significant change in the regulations as they
currently exist. For these reasons, this alternative was not
recommended.
The committees make recommendations regarding the revisions in
handling requirements after considering all available information,
including comments received by committee staff. At the meetings, the
impact of and alternatives to these recommendations are deliberated.
The committees consist of individual producers and handlers with many
years of experience in the industry and are familiar with industry
practices and trends. All committee meetings are open to the public and
comments are widely solicited. In addition, minutes of all meetings are
distributed to committee members and others who have requested them,
and are also available on the committees' Web site, thereby increasing
the availability of this critical information within the industry.
[[Page 38698]]
Regarding the impact of this action on the affected entities, both
large and small entities are expected to benefit from the changes, and
the costs of compliance are not expected to be significantly different
between large and small entities.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large nectarine or peach handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, as
stated in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
Further, the committees' meetings were widely publicized throughout
the nectarine and peach industry and all interested parties were
invited to attend the meetings and participate in Committee
deliberations. The committees have appointed a number of joint
subcommittees to review certain issues and make recommendations to the
committees. The Compliance Subcommittee met on November 3, 2009, and
discussed this issue in detail. Their recommendations were presented at
the meetings of both committees on December 10, 2009. Like all
committee meetings, the November 3, 2009 and December 10, 2009,
meetings were public meetings and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express their views on this issue.
Comments on the interim rule were required to be received on or
before June 4, 2010. No comments were received. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are adopting the interim rule as
a final rule, without change.
To view the interim rule, go to: https://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480acfc3e.
This action also affirms information contained in the interim rule
concerning Executive Orders 12866 and 12988, the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), and the E-Gov Act (44 U.S.C. 101).
After consideration of all relevant material presented, it is found
that finalizing the interim rule, without change, as published in the
Federal Register (75 FR 17027, April 5, 2010) will tend to effectuate
the declared policy of the Act.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
PARTS 916 AND 917--[AMENDED]
0
Accordingly, the interim rule that amended 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 and
that was published at 75 FR 17027 on April 5, 2010, is adopted as a
final rule, without change.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-16342 Filed 7-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P