Walker River Basin Acquisition Program, 38833 [2010-16300]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Notices
Dated: May 14, 2010.
Gordon Wissinger,
Acting Regional Director, Southeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2010–16248 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–70–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Walker River Basin Acquisition
Program
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) is canceling work on the
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the Walker River Basin Acquisition
Program (Acquisition Program).
Reclamation has determined that the
action of providing funds for the
Acquisition Program as authorized in
Public Laws 109–103 and 111–85 is not
a Federal discretionary action. In
addition, Reclamation does not have
control over the expenditure of the
funds by the Acquisition Program
recipient and has therefore determined
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) compliance is not necessary per
2008 Department of Interior regulations
for implementing NEPA (43 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 46
Implementation of the NEPA of 1969).
Reclamation included its decision that
NEPA compliance is not required in the
July 2009 Draft EIS and shared the
decision at the August 2009 public
hearings. In February 2010, Reclamation
issued a Revised Draft EIS with
incorporation of public comment for
informational purposes only rather than
a NEPA analysis. Additional comments
were not solicited on this February 2010
Revised Draft EIS, and a Final EIS and
Record of Decision (ROD) will not be
prepared.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Caryn Huntt DeCarlo, Lahontan Basin
Area Office at 775–884–8352, or e-mail
chunttdecarlo@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since
1882, diversions from the Walker River,
primarily for irrigated agriculture, have
resulted in a steadily declining surface
elevation of Walker Lake with a current
net decrease of 156 feet. The decrease
has resulted in extremely poor water
quality and deteriorated lake ecology.
As a result, several Federal laws have
been passed to address the lake’s
environmental conditions.
Reclamation’s role related to the
Acquisition Program as authorized in
two of those laws, Public Laws 109–103
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
and 111–85, is to provide funding to the
University of Nevada (University) or the
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
(NFWF) for their implementation of the
Program. Both laws direct that the funds
be used by the recipient to acquire from
willing sellers land, water appurtenant
to the land, and related interests in the
Walker River Basin, Nevada. Acquired
water rights would be transferred to
provide water for environmental
restoration of Walker Lake. NFWF and
the University entered into an
agreement in December 2009 where the
University assigned all their rights,
interests, and obligations for the
Acquisition Program to NFWF. NFWF
will be administering the Acquisition
Program going forward.
Reclamation published a Notice of
Intent to prepare an EIS on the
Acquisition Program in the Federal
Register on September 25, 2007 (72 FR
54456). Public scoping meetings on the
EIS were held in October 2007 and
meetings on the alternatives to be
evaluated in the EIS were held in June
2008. Reclamation developed a No
Action Alternative and three acquisition
alternatives to analyze in the EIS. The
objective of all acquisition alternatives
(Purchase, Leasing and Efficiency) was
to acquire sufficient water from willing
sellers to increase average annual inflow
to Walker Lake by 50,000 acre feet.
Reclamation published a Notice of
Availability of the Draft EIS on July 24,
2009 (74 FR 36737) and a notice to
reopen the comment period for review
of the Draft EIS on September 23, 2009
(74 FR 48596).
In 2008, DOI promulgated its
regulations for implementing NEPA (43
Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] part
46 Implementation of the NEPA of
1969); the rule was finalized on
November 14, 2008. Section 46.100(a) of
these regulations state in part ‘‘If Federal
funding is provided with no Federal
agency control as to the expenditure of
such funds by the recipient, NEPA
compliance is not necessary.’’
Reclamation evaluated its role for the
Acquisition Program and determined
the agency does not exercise control or
responsibility over the Acquisition
Program, is not approving the action,
and does not have control over the
expenditure of Federal funds by the
recipient. Therefore, Reclamation
determined that NEPA compliance is
not required and a ROD will not be
issued. This determination regarding
NEPA compliance and why Reclamation
would not be issuing a ROD was
explained in the July 2009 Draft EIS and
shared at the August 2009 EIS public
hearings. Reclamation also shared that
while the agency decided NEPA
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38833
compliance was not required, there was
value in soliciting public comments on
the Draft EIS, responding to comments
and incorporating as appropriate into
the analysis. Reclamation stated at the
time that a Final EIS would be
completed for informational purposes,
but later determined the title Revised
Draft EIS was more appropriate since a
ROD would not be issued.
In February 2010, Reclamation
released a Revised Draft EIS that
included responses to public comments
on the July 2009 Draft EIS and
incorporated appropriate changes to the
analysis from public comment, new
legislation, and data. The Revised Draft
EIS was prepared for informational
purposes rather than as a required
NEPA analysis for Federal agency
decision making. Additional comments
on the Revised Draft EIS were not
solicited and the document noted that a
Final EIS and ROD would not be
prepared and that the EIS would be
formally cancelled via notice in the
Federal Register.
Dated: June 28, 2010.
Pablo R. Arroyave,
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2010–16300 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Compact.
SUMMARY: This notice publishes the
Approved Compact between the
Seminole Tribe of Florida and the State
of Florida.
DATES: Effective Date: July 6, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal—State compacts for the purpose
of engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. The compact
authorizes the Seminole Tribe to operate
slot machines, raffles and drawing, and
any new game that may be authorized
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 38833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16300]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Walker River Basin Acquisition Program
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is canceling work on
the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Walker River Basin
Acquisition Program (Acquisition Program). Reclamation has determined
that the action of providing funds for the Acquisition Program as
authorized in Public Laws 109-103 and 111-85 is not a Federal
discretionary action. In addition, Reclamation does not have control
over the expenditure of the funds by the Acquisition Program recipient
and has therefore determined National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
compliance is not necessary per 2008 Department of Interior regulations
for implementing NEPA (43 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Part 46
Implementation of the NEPA of 1969). Reclamation included its decision
that NEPA compliance is not required in the July 2009 Draft EIS and
shared the decision at the August 2009 public hearings. In February
2010, Reclamation issued a Revised Draft EIS with incorporation of
public comment for informational purposes only rather than a NEPA
analysis. Additional comments were not solicited on this February 2010
Revised Draft EIS, and a Final EIS and Record of Decision (ROD) will
not be prepared.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Caryn Huntt DeCarlo, Lahontan
Basin Area Office at 775-884-8352, or e-mail chunttdecarlo@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Since 1882, diversions from the Walker
River, primarily for irrigated agriculture, have resulted in a steadily
declining surface elevation of Walker Lake with a current net decrease
of 156 feet. The decrease has resulted in extremely poor water quality
and deteriorated lake ecology. As a result, several Federal laws have
been passed to address the lake's environmental conditions.
Reclamation's role related to the Acquisition Program as authorized in
two of those laws, Public Laws 109-103 and 111-85, is to provide
funding to the University of Nevada (University) or the National Fish
and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) for their implementation of the Program.
Both laws direct that the funds be used by the recipient to acquire
from willing sellers land, water appurtenant to the land, and related
interests in the Walker River Basin, Nevada. Acquired water rights
would be transferred to provide water for environmental restoration of
Walker Lake. NFWF and the University entered into an agreement in
December 2009 where the University assigned all their rights,
interests, and obligations for the Acquisition Program to NFWF. NFWF
will be administering the Acquisition Program going forward.
Reclamation published a Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS on the
Acquisition Program in the Federal Register on September 25, 2007 (72
FR 54456). Public scoping meetings on the EIS were held in October 2007
and meetings on the alternatives to be evaluated in the EIS were held
in June 2008. Reclamation developed a No Action Alternative and three
acquisition alternatives to analyze in the EIS. The objective of all
acquisition alternatives (Purchase, Leasing and Efficiency) was to
acquire sufficient water from willing sellers to increase average
annual inflow to Walker Lake by 50,000 acre feet. Reclamation published
a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIS on July 24, 2009 (74 FR
36737) and a notice to reopen the comment period for review of the
Draft EIS on September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48596).
In 2008, DOI promulgated its regulations for implementing NEPA (43
Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] part 46 Implementation of the NEPA of
1969); the rule was finalized on November 14, 2008. Section 46.100(a)
of these regulations state in part ``If Federal funding is provided
with no Federal agency control as to the expenditure of such funds by
the recipient, NEPA compliance is not necessary.'' Reclamation
evaluated its role for the Acquisition Program and determined the
agency does not exercise control or responsibility over the Acquisition
Program, is not approving the action, and does not have control over
the expenditure of Federal funds by the recipient. Therefore,
Reclamation determined that NEPA compliance is not required and a ROD
will not be issued. This determination regarding NEPA compliance and
why Reclamation would not be issuing a ROD was explained in the July
2009 Draft EIS and shared at the August 2009 EIS public hearings.
Reclamation also shared that while the agency decided NEPA compliance
was not required, there was value in soliciting public comments on the
Draft EIS, responding to comments and incorporating as appropriate into
the analysis. Reclamation stated at the time that a Final EIS would be
completed for informational purposes, but later determined the title
Revised Draft EIS was more appropriate since a ROD would not be issued.
In February 2010, Reclamation released a Revised Draft EIS that
included responses to public comments on the July 2009 Draft EIS and
incorporated appropriate changes to the analysis from public comment,
new legislation, and data. The Revised Draft EIS was prepared for
informational purposes rather than as a required NEPA analysis for
Federal agency decision making. Additional comments on the Revised
Draft EIS were not solicited and the document noted that a Final EIS
and ROD would not be prepared and that the EIS would be formally
cancelled via notice in the Federal Register.
Dated: June 28, 2010.
Pablo R. Arroyave,
Deputy Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-16300 Filed 7-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P