NNI Strategic Plan 2010; Request for Information, 38850-38853 [2010-16273]
Download as PDF
38850
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Notices
meeting the requirements specified in
III.G.2. This change, to the operation of
the plant, has no relation to security
issues. Therefore, the common defense
and security is not diminished by this
exemption.
3.9 Special Circumstances
Special circumstances in accordance
with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii) are present
whenever application of the regulation
in the particular circumstances is not
necessary to achieve the underlying
purpose of the rule. The underlying
purpose of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R,
Section III.G is to ensure that at least
one means of achieving and maintaining
hot shutdown remains available during
and following a postulated fire event.
Therefore, since the underlying purpose
of Appendix R, Section III.G is
achieved, the special circumstances for
granting an exemption from 10 CFR Part
50, Appendix R, Section III.G exist, as
required by 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(ii).
4.0 Conclusion
Accordingly, the Commission has
determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR
50.12(a), the exemption is authorized by
law, will not present an undue risk to
the public health and safety, and is
consistent with the common defense
and security. Also, special
circumstances are present. Therefore,
the Commission hereby grants Exelon
an exemption from the requirements of
section III.G.2 of appendix R of 10 CFR
part 50, to TMI–1 for the OMA
discussed above.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the
Commission has determined that the
granting of this exemption will not have
a significant effect on the quality of the
human environment (75 FR 36700).
This exemption is effective upon
issuance.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of June 2010.
For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph G. Giitter,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2010–16352 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY POLICY
NNI Strategic Plan 2010; Request for
Information
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The purpose of this RFI is to
enhance the value of the National
Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
reaching out to the nanotechnology
stakeholder community for specific
input for the next NNI Strategic Plan to
be published in December 2010. This
RFI refers to the NNI Goals identified
from the 2007 Strategic Plan (https://
www.nano.gov/
NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) as a
starting point for questions covering
themes such as research priorities,
investment, coordination, partnerships,
evaluation, and policy.
RFI Response Instructions: The White
House Office of Science and Technology
Policy is interested in responses that
address one or more of the following
Questions below that are broadly
categorized under Goals and Objectives;
Research Priorities; Investment;
Coordination and Partnerships;
Evaluation; and Policy as related to the
NNI. When submitting your response,
please indicate: (1) The question(s) you
are answering, and (2) which of the four
NNI goals to which it applies. Please be
specific and concise.
Responses to this RFI should be
submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time
on August 15, 2010. (Submissions prior
to the July 13–14, 2010 ‘‘NNI Strategic
Plan Stakeholder Workshop’’ (https://
www.nano.gov/html/meetings/
NNISPWorkshop/) may also
inform dialogues at this event.)
Responses to this RFI must be delivered
electronically in the body of or as an
attachment to an e-mail sent to
NNIStrategy@ostp.gov. Additionally,
OSTP intends to stage an online public
comment event July 13–August 15, 2010
to solicit input on the NNI Strategic
Plan. For details on this online event,
see https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/
NNIStrategy/.
Responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
Government to form a binding contract
or issue a grant. Information obtained as
a result of this RFI may be used by the
government for program planning on a
non-attribution basis. Do not include
any information that might be
considered proprietary or confidential.
Background Information
What is the NNI? The National
Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) is a
U.S. Government research and
development (R&D) program of 25
agencies working together toward the
common challenging vision of a future
in which the ability to understand and
control matter at the nanoscale leads to
a revolution in technology and industry
that benefits society. The combined,
coordinated efforts of these agencies
have accelerated discovery,
development, and deployment of
nanotechnology towards agency
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
missions and the broader national
interest. Established in 2001, the NNI
involves nanotechnology-related
activities by the 25 member agencies, 15
of which have budgets for
nanotechnology R&D for 2011.
The NNI is managed within the
framework of the National Science and
Technology Council (NSTC), the
Cabinet-level council by which the
President coordinates science and
technology across the Federal
Government and interfaces with other
sectors. The Nanoscale Science,
Engineering, and Technology (NSET)
Subcommittee of the NSTC coordinates
planning, budgeting, program
implementation, and review of the NNI.
The NSET Subcommittee is composed
of senior representatives from agencies
participating in the NNI (https://
www.nano.gov).
NNI Goals: The December 2007 NNI
Strategic Plan (https://www.nano.gov/
NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) specifies
four overarching, crosscutting goals
towards achieving the overall vision of
the NNI:
Goal 1: Advance a world-class
nanotechnology research and
development program. The NNI ensures
United States leadership in
nanotechnology research and
development by stimulating discovery
and innovation. This program expands
the boundaries of knowledge and
develops technologies through a
comprehensive program of research and
development. The NNI agencies invest
at the frontiers and intersections of
many disciplines, including biology,
chemistry, engineering, materials
science, and physics. The interest in
nanotechnology arises from its potential
to significantly impact numerous fields,
including aerospace, agriculture, energy,
the environment, healthcare,
information technology, homeland
security, national defense, and
transportation systems.
Goal 2: Foster the transfer of new
technologies into products for
commercial and public benefit.
Nanotechnology contributes to United
States competitiveness by improving
existing products and processes and by
creating new ones. The NNI implements
strategies that maximize the economic
benefits of its investments in
nanotechnology, based on
understanding the fundamental science
and responsibly translating this
knowledge into practical applications.
Goal 3: Develop and sustain
educational resources, a skilled
workforce, and the supporting
infrastructure and tools to advance
nanotechnology. A skilled science and
engineering workforce, leading-edge
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Notices
instrumentation, and state-of-the-art
facilities are essential to advancing
nanotechnology research and
development. Educational programs and
resources are required to produce the
next generation of nanotechnologists,
that is, the researchers, inventors,
engineers, and technicians who drive
discovery, innovation, industry, and
manufacturing.
Goal 4: Support responsible
development of nanotechnology. The
NNI aims to maximize the benefits of
nanotechnology and at the same time to
develop an understanding of potential
risks and to develop the means to
manage them. Specifically, the NNI
pursues a program of research,
education, and communication focused
on environmental, health, safety, and
broader societal dimensions of
nanotechnology development.
Program Component Areas (PCAs):
The December 2007 NNI Strategic Plan
(https://www.nano.gov/
NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) lays out
eight categories of NNI investment
known as program component areas
(PCAs) to facilitate coordination,
planning, and assessment of efforts
towards achieving the NNI goals. The
PCAs are: 1. Fundamental nanoscale
phenomena and processes; 2.
Nanomaterials; 3. Nanoscale devices
and systems; 4. Instrumentation
research, metrology, and standards for
nanotechnology; 5. Nanomanufacturing;
6. Major research facilities and
instrumentation acquisition; 7.
Environment, health, and safety; and 8.
Education and societal dimensions.
NNI Budget: Federal agencies
annually report individual investments
in nanotechnology R&D within PCAs in
support of national goals and agency
missions. Each agency separately
determines its budgets for
nanotechnology R&D, in coordination
with the Office of Management and
Budget, the Office of Science and
Technology Policy, and Congress. Thus,
the NNI is an interagency budget
crosscut in which participating agencies
work closely with each other to create
an integrated program through
communication, coordination, and
collaboration. The proposed NNI budget
for Fiscal Year 2011 is $1.76 billion,
bringing the cumulative investment
since the inception of the NNI in 2001
to nearly $14 billion (https://
www.nano.gov/
NNI_2011_budget_supplement.pdf).
NNI Coordination: Enhanced
communication through committees and
working groups has led to joint
coordination and collaboration in a
variety of forms. The NSET
Subcommittee has established four
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
working groups: (1) The Global Issues in
Nanotechnology (GIN) Working Group,
(2) the Nanotechnology Environmental
and Health Implications (NEHI)
Working Group, (3) the
Nanomanufacturing, Industry Liaison,
and Innovation (NILI) Working Group,
and (4) the Nanotechnology Public
Engagement and Communication
(NPEC) Working Group. (See https://
www.nano.gov/html/about/
nsetworkinggroups.html.) Products from
these working groups and other
interagency collaborations include
sharing of knowledge and expertise;
joint sponsorship of solicitations and
workshops; and leveraging funding,
staff, and facility/equipment resources
at NNI participating agencies. The
National Nanotechnology Coordination
Office (NNCO; https://www.nano.gov/
html/about/nnco.html) acts as the
primary point of contact for information
on the NNI, provides public outreach on
behalf of the NNI, and provides
technical and administrative support to
the NSET Subcommittee as well as the
NSET working groups listed above.
Questions
A. Goals and Objectives
• A1. What specific and measurable
objectives should be established to help
achieve the four stated NNI goals?
• A2. Are there other overarching
goals that would enable the NNI to
better support the vision of a future in
which the ability to understand and
control matter at the nanoscale leads to
a revolution in technology and industry
that benefits society?
Example: In achieving Goal 2, ‘‘to
foster the transfer of new technologies
into products for commercial and
societal benefit,’’ one objective could be
for the NNI member agencies to increase
their emphasis on commercialization of
nanotechnology-based products by
launching new government-industryuniversity partnerships using successful
models such as the Nanoelectronics
Research Initiative (NRI; https://
nri.src.org/member/about/default.asp;
cf. recommendations in the President’s
Council of Advisors on Science &
Technology’s ‘‘Report to the President
and Congress on the Third Assessment
of the National Nanotechnology
Initiative’’ (https://www.whitehouse.gov/
sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcastnano-report.pdf).
B. Research Priorities
• B1. What are the most important
gaps in the NNI R&D portfolio (i.e.,
specific underfunded areas ripe for
success) that should be addressed to
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38851
achieve the NNI goal(s) (please specify
1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
• B2. What nanotechnology R&D
areas should NNI member agencies
pursue under the Nanotechnology
Signature Initiatives model of close and
targeted program-level interagency
collaboration to help accelerate
nanotechnology innovation?
Background: To accelerate
nanotechnology development in support
of the President’s priorities and
innovation strategy, NNI member
agencies have identified areas ripe for
significant advances through closer
program-level interagency collaboration
oriented around specific targets that are
not likely to be achieved apart from
more intensive interagency and crosssector collaboration. The three resulting
Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives for
FY 2011 are: 1. Nanotechnology
applications for solar energy; 2.
Sustainable Nanomanufacturing; and 3.
Nanoelectronics for 2020 and Beyond
(details are available at https://
www.nano.gov/html/research/
signature_initiatives.html). These
Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives
represent the leading edge of functional
interagency collaboration in the budget
and program planning process under the
NNI, with multiple agencies working in
common toward specific objectives.
• B3. What are the most important
scientific and technical challenges that
would need to be met to realize the NNI
goal(s) (1, 2, 3, and/or 4) and objectives?
C. Investment
• C1. What types of research and
development investments (e.g. support
for individual investigators, small
teams, centers, research infrastructure,
etc.) should the NNI agencies create,
sustain, and/or expand to achieve the
NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/
or 4)?
Example, Department of Energy: the
Department of Energy (DOE) investment
in 2011 continues to support full
operation of the five DOE Nanoscale
Science Research Center (NSRC) user
facilities (corresponding to PCA 6, major
research facilities and instrumentation
acquisition) and an extensive array of
individual university grants and
laboratory research programs. The
Energy Frontier Research Centers, larger
collaborative efforts in which a portion
of the activity relates to nanoscale
science, are also continued. In 2010
DOE initiates an Energy Innovation Hub
on Fuels from Sunlight, and this
support will continue in 2011, with a
portion of the activity related to
nanoscience. Much of the increase in
DOE funding results from new funding
from the Advanced Research Projects
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
38852
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Notices
Agency—Energy (ARPA–E), the
initiation of additional Energy Frontier
Research Centers, and the formation of
a second Energy Innovation Hub
focusing on batteries and energy storage.
A significant fraction of these activities
will be fundamentally based on
nanoscience.
Example, National Science
Foundation and Environmental
Protection Agency: In 2011, the NSF and
the EPA continue to fund (over five
years, starting in September 2008) two
Centers for the Environmental
Implications of Nanotechnology (CEIN).
Led by the University of California Los
Angeles and Duke University, the CEINs
will study how nanomaterials interact
with the environment and human
health, resulting in better risk
assessment and risk mitigation
strategies. Each center works as a
network, connected to multiple research
organizations, industry, and government
agencies, and emphasizes
interdisciplinary research and
education.
• C2. What relative distribution of
research and development investment
among the PCAs is needed to achieve
the NNI goal(s) (1, 2, 3, and/or 4), and
why?
Background: While the NNI remains
focused on fulfilling the Federal role of
supporting basic research, infrastructure
development, and technology transfer,
the proposed investments for 2011 place
renewed emphasis on accelerating the
transition from basic R&D advances and
capabilities into innovations that
support national priorities such as
sustainable energy technologies,
healthcare, and environmental
protection. While the dominant focus of
NNI funding represented in PCAs 1, 2,
and 3 have been relatively sustained,
the fastest-growing PCAs in recent years
have been those for EHS (PCA 7, the
requested EHS investment for 2011 is
$117 million—over triple the figure for
2005) and nanomanufacturing (PCA 5,
increasing from $34 million in 2006 to
$101 million in the 2011 request), with
a resultant small percentage reduction
(about one percent change from 2010) in
the highest-funded PCA, fundamental
nanoscale phenomena and processes
(PCA 1, $484.4 million in the 2011
request). See the NNI Supplement to the
President’s FY 2011 Budget at https://
www.nano.gov/
NNI_2011_budget_supplement.pdf,
pages 7–11 and the data.gov site
(https://www.data.gov/raw/1556/#) for
more details on relative funding over
time.
• C3. What is the appropriate balance
for investment in nanotechnology
among US private and public entities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
(i.e., government, corporate R&D, and
venture capital) to achieve the NNI
goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4),
and why?
Background: The President’s Council
of Advisors on Science & Technology’s
‘‘Report to the President and Congress
on the Third Assessment of the National
Nanotechnology Initiative’’ (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
microsites/ostp/pcast-nano-report.pdf)
reports that the United States invested
$5.7 billion in nanotechnology Research
& Development in 2008, which
corresponds approximately to one-third
from Federal and State governments,
half from corporate investments, and
about one-fifth from venture capital
investments.
D. Coordination and Partnerships
• D1. How could the NNI strengthen
interagency coordination and
collaboration towards specific NNI
goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)
and objectives?
• D2. What improved mechanisms
may be utilized to facilitate innovative
cross-disciplinary research supporting
the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4)?
• D3. What are the most effective
roles of the government, industry,
academia, and other stakeholders in
achieving this NNI goal (1, 2, 3, and/or
4)?
• D4. What new forms of
collaboration between stakeholders
should be explored to facilitate
nanotechnology-based innovation into
applications?
Government-Government Example: to
help accomplish Goal 4, to ‘‘support
responsible development of
nanotechnology,’’ the National Institutes
of Health’s (NIH) National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
is supporting research to determine
precisely the physical and chemical
properties of nanomaterials with
biological response, thus supplying
critical data for hazard and risk
assessment. To support the goals of this
program, NIEHS is establishing
collaborations with the NIH/National
Cancer Institute’s Nanotechnology
Characterization Laboratory for physical
characterization of nanomaterials and
with the Cancer Biomedical Informatics
Grid (CaBIG®) NanoLab for data storage.
• D5. What existing activities in the
public and private sector could the NNI
develop or model to achieve the NNI
goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
Example: The NRI (described above in
section A) is a leading example of
industry-university cooperative research
involving more than 30 top universities
in the United States with research
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
projects organized around four multiuniversity centers incorporating state
and regional funding as well.
• D6. What partners or types of
partners would need to collaborate (i.e.,
government, specific foundations and
industry groups, new ideas for
consortia) to accomplish the NNI goal(s)
(please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
• D7. What are effective mechanisms
to leverage and/or coordinate USfunded research and development with
international efforts?
• D8. What mechanisms could NNI
use to regularly engage experts in
academia and industry and other
organizations for input on its approach
to addressing specific NNI goals (please
specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
• D9. What is the role of public
engagement in achieving specific NNI
goals? In what ways can the Federal
government best engage with citizens to
ensure the sustainable development of
nanotechnology-based products with
the broadest economic and societal
benefits?
Evaluation
• E1. What specific criteria (e.g.,
nanotechnology publications and
citations, nanotechnology patent
activity, nanotechnology-related job
creation, relative international
nanotechnology investments) should the
NNI use to evaluate its progress towards
the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4) and in what priority order?
• E2. Which organizations (e.g.,
government committees, independent
organizations, international bodies)
should perform the evaluation of
progress towards the NNI goal(s) (please
specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
• E3. How can NNI best balance
fundamental and applied research and
development towards the NNI goal(s)
(please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
Policy
• F1. What new, or existing, specific
policies should the NNI agencies
develop or adjust to support the NNI
goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)
and to realize the broader economic and
societal benefits associated with
advances in nanotechnology?
Examples: Policies that impact and/or
support the NNI goals might address
procurement, incentive prizes, technical
documentary standards, international
collaboration, targeted investment,
permanent resident cards for foreign
graduates from accredited US academic
institutions, etc.
• F2. What best practices can be
drawn from nanotechnology- and
innovation-related policies in other
sectors and countries?
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 6, 2010 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any
questions about the content of this RFI
should be sent to NNIStrategy@ostp.gov.
Additional information regarding this
RFI is at https://www.whitehouse.gov/
ostp/NNIStrategy/. Questions and
responses may also be sent by mail
(please allow additional time for
processing) to the address: Office of
Science and Technology Policy, ATTN:
Nano RFI, Executive Office of the
President, 725 17th Street, Room 5228,
Washington, DC 20502. Phone: (202)
456–7116, Fax: (202) 456–6021.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2010–16273 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170–W0–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Form N–14; SEC File No. 270–297; OMB
Control No. 3235–0336]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copy Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Extension:
Form N–14, SEC File No. 270–297, OMB
Control No. 3235–0336.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collection of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Form N–14 (17 CFR 239.23)—
Registration Statement Under the
Securities Act of 1933 for Securities
Issued in Business Combination
Transactions by Investment Companies
and Business Development Companies.
Form N–14 is used by investment
companies registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) (‘‘Investment
Company Act’’) and business
development companies as defined by
section 2(a)(48) of the Investment
Company Act to register securities
under the Securities Act of 1933 (15
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) (‘‘Securities Act’’) to
be issued in business combination
transactions specified in rule 145(a)
under the Securities Act (17 CFR
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Jul 02, 2010
Jkt 220001
230.145(a)) and exchange offers. The
securities are registered under the
Securities Act to ensure that investors
receive the material information
necessary to evaluate securities issued
in business combination transactions.
The Commission staff reviews
registration statements on Form N–14
for the adequacy and accuracy of the
disclosure contained therein. Without
Form N–14, the Commission would be
unable to verify compliance with
securities law requirements. The
respondents to the collection of
information are investment companies
or business development companies
issuing securities in business
combination transactions. The estimated
number of responses is 286 (including
266 registrants that file one new
registration statement on Form N–14
each year and 20 registrants that file one
amendment to Form N–14 each year)
and the collection occurs only when a
merger or other business combination is
planned. The estimated total annual
reporting burden of the collection of
information is approximately 620 hours
per response for a new registration
statement, and approximately 350 hours
per response for an amended Form N–
14, for a total of 171,920 annual burden
hours.
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the Commission’s
mission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s
estimate of the burden of the collection
of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Charles Boucher, Director/CIO,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
C/O Shirley Martinson, 6432 General
Green Way, Alexandria, VA, 22312; or
send an e-mail to:
PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010–16306 Filed 7–2–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38853
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 0–2, SEC File No. 270–572, OMB
Control No. 3235–0636.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Several sections of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (‘‘Act’’ or
‘‘Investment Company Act’’) 1 give the
Commission the authority to issue
orders granting exemptions from the
Act’s provisions. The section that grants
broadest authority is section 6(c), which
provides the Commission with authority
to conditionally or unconditionally
exempt persons, securities or
transactions from any provision of the
Investment Company Act, or the rules or
regulations thereunder, if and to the
extent that such exemption is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the Act.2
Rule 0–2 under the Investment
Company Act,3 entitled ‘‘General
Requirements of Papers and
Applications,’’ prescribes general
instructions for filing an application
seeking exemptive relief with the
Commission for which a form is not
specifically prescribed. Rule 0–2
requires that each application filed with
the commission have (a) A statement of
authorization to file and sign the
application on behalf of the applicant,
(b) a verification of application and
statements of fact, (c) a brief statement
of the grounds for application, and (d)
the name and address of each applicant
and of any person to whom questions
should be directed. The Commission
uses the information required by rule 0–
2 to decide whether the applicant
1 15
U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.
U.S.C. 80a–6(c).
3 17 CFR 270.0–2.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\06JYN1.SGM
06JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38850-38853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
NNI Strategic Plan 2010; Request for Information
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of this RFI is to enhance the value of the
National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) by reaching out to the
nanotechnology stakeholder community for specific input for the next
NNI Strategic Plan to be published in December 2010. This RFI refers to
the NNI Goals identified from the 2007 Strategic Plan (https://www.nano.gov/NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) as a starting point for
questions covering themes such as research priorities, investment,
coordination, partnerships, evaluation, and policy.
RFI Response Instructions: The White House Office of Science and
Technology Policy is interested in responses that address one or more
of the following Questions below that are broadly categorized under
Goals and Objectives; Research Priorities; Investment; Coordination and
Partnerships; Evaluation; and Policy as related to the NNI. When
submitting your response, please indicate: (1) The question(s) you are
answering, and (2) which of the four NNI goals to which it applies.
Please be specific and concise.
Responses to this RFI should be submitted by 11:59 p.m. Eastern
Time on August 15, 2010. (Submissions prior to the July 13-14, 2010
``NNI Strategic Plan Stakeholder Workshop'' (https://www.nano.gov/html/meetings/NNISPWorkshop/) may also inform dialogues at this
event.) Responses to this RFI must be delivered electronically in the
body of or as an attachment to an e-mail sent to NNIStrategy@ostp.gov.
Additionally, OSTP intends to stage an online public comment event July
13-August 15, 2010 to solicit input on the NNI Strategic Plan. For
details on this online event, see https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/NNIStrategy/.
Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by
the Government to form a binding contract or issue a grant. Information
obtained as a result of this RFI may be used by the government for
program planning on a non-attribution basis. Do not include any
information that might be considered proprietary or confidential.
Background Information
What is the NNI? The National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) is a
U.S. Government research and development (R&D) program of 25 agencies
working together toward the common challenging vision of a future in
which the ability to understand and control matter at the nanoscale
leads to a revolution in technology and industry that benefits society.
The combined, coordinated efforts of these agencies have accelerated
discovery, development, and deployment of nanotechnology towards agency
missions and the broader national interest. Established in 2001, the
NNI involves nanotechnology-related activities by the 25 member
agencies, 15 of which have budgets for nanotechnology R&D for 2011.
The NNI is managed within the framework of the National Science and
Technology Council (NSTC), the Cabinet-level council by which the
President coordinates science and technology across the Federal
Government and interfaces with other sectors. The Nanoscale Science,
Engineering, and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee of the NSTC coordinates
planning, budgeting, program implementation, and review of the NNI. The
NSET Subcommittee is composed of senior representatives from agencies
participating in the NNI (https://www.nano.gov).
NNI Goals: The December 2007 NNI Strategic Plan (https://www.nano.gov/NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) specifies four
overarching, crosscutting goals towards achieving the overall vision of
the NNI:
Goal 1: Advance a world-class nanotechnology research and
development program. The NNI ensures United States leadership in
nanotechnology research and development by stimulating discovery and
innovation. This program expands the boundaries of knowledge and
develops technologies through a comprehensive program of research and
development. The NNI agencies invest at the frontiers and intersections
of many disciplines, including biology, chemistry, engineering,
materials science, and physics. The interest in nanotechnology arises
from its potential to significantly impact numerous fields, including
aerospace, agriculture, energy, the environment, healthcare,
information technology, homeland security, national defense, and
transportation systems.
Goal 2: Foster the transfer of new technologies into products for
commercial and public benefit. Nanotechnology contributes to United
States competitiveness by improving existing products and processes and
by creating new ones. The NNI implements strategies that maximize the
economic benefits of its investments in nanotechnology, based on
understanding the fundamental science and responsibly translating this
knowledge into practical applications.
Goal 3: Develop and sustain educational resources, a skilled
workforce, and the supporting infrastructure and tools to advance
nanotechnology. A skilled science and engineering workforce, leading-
edge
[[Page 38851]]
instrumentation, and state-of-the-art facilities are essential to
advancing nanotechnology research and development. Educational programs
and resources are required to produce the next generation of
nanotechnologists, that is, the researchers, inventors, engineers, and
technicians who drive discovery, innovation, industry, and
manufacturing.
Goal 4: Support responsible development of nanotechnology. The NNI
aims to maximize the benefits of nanotechnology and at the same time to
develop an understanding of potential risks and to develop the means to
manage them. Specifically, the NNI pursues a program of research,
education, and communication focused on environmental, health, safety,
and broader societal dimensions of nanotechnology development.
Program Component Areas (PCAs): The December 2007 NNI Strategic
Plan (https://www.nano.gov/NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf) lays out
eight categories of NNI investment known as program component areas
(PCAs) to facilitate coordination, planning, and assessment of efforts
towards achieving the NNI goals. The PCAs are: 1. Fundamental nanoscale
phenomena and processes; 2. Nanomaterials; 3. Nanoscale devices and
systems; 4. Instrumentation research, metrology, and standards for
nanotechnology; 5. Nanomanufacturing; 6. Major research facilities and
instrumentation acquisition; 7. Environment, health, and safety; and 8.
Education and societal dimensions.
NNI Budget: Federal agencies annually report individual investments
in nanotechnology R&D within PCAs in support of national goals and
agency missions. Each agency separately determines its budgets for
nanotechnology R&D, in coordination with the Office of Management and
Budget, the Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Congress.
Thus, the NNI is an interagency budget crosscut in which participating
agencies work closely with each other to create an integrated program
through communication, coordination, and collaboration. The proposed
NNI budget for Fiscal Year 2011 is $1.76 billion, bringing the
cumulative investment since the inception of the NNI in 2001 to nearly
$14 billion (https://www.nano.gov/NNI_2011_budget_supplement.pdf).
NNI Coordination: Enhanced communication through committees and
working groups has led to joint coordination and collaboration in a
variety of forms. The NSET Subcommittee has established four working
groups: (1) The Global Issues in Nanotechnology (GIN) Working Group,
(2) the Nanotechnology Environmental and Health Implications (NEHI)
Working Group, (3) the Nanomanufacturing, Industry Liaison, and
Innovation (NILI) Working Group, and (4) the Nanotechnology Public
Engagement and Communication (NPEC) Working Group. (See https://www.nano.gov/html/about/nsetworkinggroups.html.) Products from these
working groups and other interagency collaborations include sharing of
knowledge and expertise; joint sponsorship of solicitations and
workshops; and leveraging funding, staff, and facility/equipment
resources at NNI participating agencies. The National Nanotechnology
Coordination Office (NNCO; https://www.nano.gov/html/about/nnco.html)
acts as the primary point of contact for information on the NNI,
provides public outreach on behalf of the NNI, and provides technical
and administrative support to the NSET Subcommittee as well as the NSET
working groups listed above.
Questions
A. Goals and Objectives
A1. What specific and measurable objectives should be
established to help achieve the four stated NNI goals?
A2. Are there other overarching goals that would enable
the NNI to better support the vision of a future in which the ability
to understand and control matter at the nanoscale leads to a revolution
in technology and industry that benefits society?
Example: In achieving Goal 2, ``to foster the transfer of new
technologies into products for commercial and societal benefit,'' one
objective could be for the NNI member agencies to increase their
emphasis on commercialization of nanotechnology-based products by
launching new government-industry-university partnerships using
successful models such as the Nanoelectronics Research Initiative (NRI;
https://nri.src.org/member/about/default.asp; cf. recommendations in the
President's Council of Advisors on Science & Technology's ``Report to
the President and Congress on the Third Assessment of the National
Nanotechnology Initiative'' (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nano-report.pdf).
B. Research Priorities
B1. What are the most important gaps in the NNI R&D
portfolio (i.e., specific underfunded areas ripe for success) that
should be addressed to achieve the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4)?
B2. What nanotechnology R&D areas should NNI member
agencies pursue under the Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives model of
close and targeted program-level interagency collaboration to help
accelerate nanotechnology innovation?
Background: To accelerate nanotechnology development in support of
the President's priorities and innovation strategy, NNI member agencies
have identified areas ripe for significant advances through closer
program-level interagency collaboration oriented around specific
targets that are not likely to be achieved apart from more intensive
interagency and cross-sector collaboration. The three resulting
Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives for FY 2011 are: 1. Nanotechnology
applications for solar energy; 2. Sustainable Nanomanufacturing; and 3.
Nanoelectronics for 2020 and Beyond (details are available at https://www.nano.gov/html/research/signature_initiatives.html). These
Nanotechnology Signature Initiatives represent the leading edge of
functional interagency collaboration in the budget and program planning
process under the NNI, with multiple agencies working in common toward
specific objectives.
B3. What are the most important scientific and technical
challenges that would need to be met to realize the NNI goal(s) (1, 2,
3, and/or 4) and objectives?
C. Investment
C1. What types of research and development investments
(e.g. support for individual investigators, small teams, centers,
research infrastructure, etc.) should the NNI agencies create, sustain,
and/or expand to achieve the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/
or 4)?
Example, Department of Energy: the Department of Energy (DOE)
investment in 2011 continues to support full operation of the five DOE
Nanoscale Science Research Center (NSRC) user facilities (corresponding
to PCA 6, major research facilities and instrumentation acquisition)
and an extensive array of individual university grants and laboratory
research programs. The Energy Frontier Research Centers, larger
collaborative efforts in which a portion of the activity relates to
nanoscale science, are also continued. In 2010 DOE initiates an Energy
Innovation Hub on Fuels from Sunlight, and this support will continue
in 2011, with a portion of the activity related to nanoscience. Much of
the increase in DOE funding results from new funding from the Advanced
Research Projects
[[Page 38852]]
Agency--Energy (ARPA-E), the initiation of additional Energy Frontier
Research Centers, and the formation of a second Energy Innovation Hub
focusing on batteries and energy storage. A significant fraction of
these activities will be fundamentally based on nanoscience.
Example, National Science Foundation and Environmental Protection
Agency: In 2011, the NSF and the EPA continue to fund (over five years,
starting in September 2008) two Centers for the Environmental
Implications of Nanotechnology (CEIN). Led by the University of
California Los Angeles and Duke University, the CEINs will study how
nanomaterials interact with the environment and human health, resulting
in better risk assessment and risk mitigation strategies. Each center
works as a network, connected to multiple research organizations,
industry, and government agencies, and emphasizes interdisciplinary
research and education.
C2. What relative distribution of research and development
investment among the PCAs is needed to achieve the NNI goal(s) (1, 2,
3, and/or 4), and why?
Background: While the NNI remains focused on fulfilling the Federal
role of supporting basic research, infrastructure development, and
technology transfer, the proposed investments for 2011 place renewed
emphasis on accelerating the transition from basic R&D advances and
capabilities into innovations that support national priorities such as
sustainable energy technologies, healthcare, and environmental
protection. While the dominant focus of NNI funding represented in PCAs
1, 2, and 3 have been relatively sustained, the fastest-growing PCAs in
recent years have been those for EHS (PCA 7, the requested EHS
investment for 2011 is $117 million--over triple the figure for 2005)
and nanomanufacturing (PCA 5, increasing from $34 million in 2006 to
$101 million in the 2011 request), with a resultant small percentage
reduction (about one percent change from 2010) in the highest-funded
PCA, fundamental nanoscale phenomena and processes (PCA 1, $484.4
million in the 2011 request). See the NNI Supplement to the President's
FY 2011 Budget at https://www.nano.gov/NNI_2011_budget_supplement.pdf, pages 7-11 and the data.gov site (https://www.data.gov/raw/1556/#) for more details on relative funding over time.
C3. What is the appropriate balance for investment in
nanotechnology among US private and public entities (i.e., government,
corporate R&D, and venture capital) to achieve the NNI goal(s) (please
specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4), and why?
Background: The President's Council of Advisors on Science &
Technology's ``Report to the President and Congress on the Third
Assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative'' (https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nano-report.pdf) reports that the United States invested $5.7 billion in
nanotechnology Research & Development in 2008, which corresponds
approximately to one-third from Federal and State governments, half
from corporate investments, and about one-fifth from venture capital
investments.
D. Coordination and Partnerships
D1. How could the NNI strengthen interagency coordination
and collaboration towards specific NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4) and objectives?
D2. What improved mechanisms may be utilized to facilitate
innovative cross-disciplinary research supporting the NNI goal(s)
(please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
D3. What are the most effective roles of the government,
industry, academia, and other stakeholders in achieving this NNI goal
(1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
D4. What new forms of collaboration between stakeholders
should be explored to facilitate nanotechnology-based innovation into
applications?
Government-Government Example: to help accomplish Goal 4, to
``support responsible development of nanotechnology,'' the National
Institutes of Health's (NIH) National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences (NIEHS) is supporting research to determine precisely the
physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials with biological
response, thus supplying critical data for hazard and risk assessment.
To support the goals of this program, NIEHS is establishing
collaborations with the NIH/National Cancer Institute's Nanotechnology
Characterization Laboratory for physical characterization of
nanomaterials and with the Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid
(CaBIG[supreg]) NanoLab for data storage.
D5. What existing activities in the public and private
sector could the NNI develop or model to achieve the NNI goal(s)
(please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
Example: The NRI (described above in section A) is a leading
example of industry-university cooperative research involving more than
30 top universities in the United States with research projects
organized around four multi-university centers incorporating state and
regional funding as well.
D6. What partners or types of partners would need to
collaborate (i.e., government, specific foundations and industry
groups, new ideas for consortia) to accomplish the NNI goal(s) (please
specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4)?
D7. What are effective mechanisms to leverage and/or
coordinate US-funded research and development with international
efforts?
D8. What mechanisms could NNI use to regularly engage
experts in academia and industry and other organizations for input on
its approach to addressing specific NNI goals (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4)?
D9. What is the role of public engagement in achieving
specific NNI goals? In what ways can the Federal government best engage
with citizens to ensure the sustainable development of nanotechnology-
based products with the broadest economic and societal benefits?
Evaluation
E1. What specific criteria (e.g., nanotechnology
publications and citations, nanotechnology patent activity,
nanotechnology-related job creation, relative international
nanotechnology investments) should the NNI use to evaluate its progress
towards the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4) and in what
priority order?
E2. Which organizations (e.g., government committees,
independent organizations, international bodies) should perform the
evaluation of progress towards the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2, 3,
and/or 4)?
E3. How can NNI best balance fundamental and applied
research and development towards the NNI goal(s) (please specify 1, 2,
3, and/or 4)?
Policy
F1. What new, or existing, specific policies should the
NNI agencies develop or adjust to support the NNI goal(s) (please
specify 1, 2, 3, and/or 4) and to realize the broader economic and
societal benefits associated with advances in nanotechnology?
Examples: Policies that impact and/or support the NNI goals might
address procurement, incentive prizes, technical documentary standards,
international collaboration, targeted investment, permanent resident
cards for foreign graduates from accredited US academic institutions,
etc.
F2. What best practices can be drawn from nanotechnology-
and innovation-related policies in other sectors and countries?
[[Page 38853]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any questions about the content of
this RFI should be sent to NNIStrategy@ostp.gov. Additional information
regarding this RFI is at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/NNIStrategy/.
Questions and responses may also be sent by mail (please allow
additional time for processing) to the address: Office of Science and
Technology Policy, ATTN: Nano RFI, Executive Office of the President,
725 17th Street, Room 5228, Washington, DC 20502. Phone: (202) 456-
7116, Fax: (202) 456-6021.
Dated: June 29, 2010.
Ted Wackler,
Deputy Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2010-16273 Filed 7-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3170-W0-P