State Responsibility for the Timely Reporting and Posting of Certain Convictions and Disqualifications Involving Commercial Driver's License Holders, 38603-38605 [2010-16218]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
51568; 64 FR 68195; 65 FR 20251; 67 FR
38311; 69 FR 26221; 71 FR 27033; 73 FR
52451; 69 FR 26921; 73 FR 28186; 67 FR
17102; 69 FR 17267; 71 FR 26601; 73 FR
27017; 67 FR 10471; 67 FR 19798; 69 FR
19611; 71 FR 19604; 73 FR 27014; 68 FR
10301; 68 FR 19596; 70 FR 74102; 73 FR
52451; 68 FR 74699; 69 FR 10503; 71 FR
16410; 73 FR 28188; 69 FR 17263; 69 FR
31447; 71 FR 43556; 73 FR 52451; 73 FR
36954; 71 FR 14566; 71 FR 30227; 73 FR
27014; 73 FR 52451; 71 FR 32183; 71 FR
41310; 73 FR 15567; 73 FR 27015). Each
of these 13 applicants has requested
renewal of the exemption and has
submitted evidence showing that the
vision in the better eye continues to
meet the standard specified at 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) and that the vision
impairment is stable. In addition, a
review of each record of safety while
driving with the respective vision
deficiencies over the past two years
indicates each applicant continues to
meet the vision exemption standards.
These factors provide an adequate basis
for predicting each driver’s ability to
continue to drive safely in interstate
commerce. Therefore, FMCSA
concludes that extending the exemption
for each renewal applicant for a period
of two years is likely to achieve a level
of safety equal to that existing without
the exemption.
Request for Comments
FMCSA will review comments
received at any time concerning a
particular driver’s safety record and
determine if the continuation of the
exemption is consistent with the
requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315. However, FMCSA requests that
interested parties with specific data
concerning the safety records of these
drivers submit comments by August 2,
2010.
FMCSA believes that the
requirements for a renewal of an
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and
31315 can be satisfied by initially
granting the renewal and then
requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by
interested parties. As indicated above,
the Agency previously published
Notices of final disposition announcing
its decision to exempt these 13
individuals from the vision requirement
in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final
decision to grant an exemption to each
of these individuals was made on the
merits of each case and made only after
careful consideration of the comments
received to its Notices of applications.
The Notices of applications stated in
detail the qualifications, experience,
and medical condition of each applicant
for an exemption from the vision
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements. That information is
available by consulting the above cited
Federal Register publications.
Interested parties or organizations
possessing information that would
otherwise show that any, or all, of these
drivers are not currently achieving the
statutory level of safety should
immediately notify FMCSA. The
Agency will evaluate any adverse
evidence submitted and, if safety is
being compromised or if continuation of
the exemption would not be consistent
with the goals and objectives of 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will
take immediate steps to revoke the
exemption of a driver.
[FR Doc. 2010–16180 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–1999–5578; FMCSA–
1999–6480; FMCSA–2000–7006; FMCSA–
2000–7165; FMCSA–2000–7363; FMCSA–
2004–17195; FMCSA–2006–23773]
Qualification of Drivers; Exemption
Renewals; Vision
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final disposition.
SUMMARY: FMCSA previously
announced its decision to renew the
exemptions from the vision requirement
in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations for 21 individuals. FMCSA
has statutory authority to exempt
individuals from the vision requirement
if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has
concluded that granting these
exemptions will provide a level of safety
that will be equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety maintained
without the exemptions for these
commercial motor vehicle (CMV)
drivers.
Dr.
Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs, (202)–366–4001,
fmcsamedical@dot.gov, FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64–
224, Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00148
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315,
FMCSA may grant an exemption for a 2year period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.’’ The statute also
allows the Agency to renew exemptions
at the end of the 2-year period. The
comment period ended on June 16, 2010
(75 FR 27623).
Discussion of Comments
FMCSA received no comments in this
proceeding.
Conclusion
Issued on: June 28, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
38603
The Agency has not received any
adverse evidence on any of these drivers
that indicates that safety is being
compromised. Based upon its
evaluation of the 21 renewal
applications, FMCSA renews the
Federal vision exemptions for James C.
Askin, Paul J. Bannon, Ernie E. Black,
Ronnie F. Bowman, Gary O. Brady,
Stephen H. Goldcamp, Steven F. Grass,
Wai F. King, Dennis E. Krone, Richard
J. McKenzie, Jr., Christopher J. Meerten,
Craig W. Miller, William J. Miller,
Robert J. Mohorter, James A. Mohr,
Roderick F. Peterson, Tommy L. Ray, Jr.,
George S. Rayson, Donald W. Sidwell,
Elmer K. Thomas and Raul R. Torres.
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315, each renewal exemption will
be valid for 2 years unless revoked
earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will
be revoked if: (1) The person fails to
comply with the terms and conditions
of the exemption; (2) the exemption has
resulted in a lower level of safety than
was maintained before it was granted; or
(3) continuation of the exemption would
not be consistent with the goals and
objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136 and 31315.
Issued on: June 28, 2010.
Larry W. Minor
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–16210 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
State Responsibility for the Timely
Reporting and Posting of Certain
Convictions and Disqualifications
Involving Commercial Driver’s License
Holders
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, DOT.
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
38604
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
Notice.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration announces
guidance to State driver licensing
agencies (SDLAs) to support their efforts
at achieving compliance with the
Federal Commercial Driver’s license
(CDL) rules concerning timely reporting
and posting of convictions for traffic
offenses. This action is in response to
the Department of Transportation Office
of the Inspector General’s (OIG) 2009
report Audit of the Data Integrity of the
Commercial Driver’s License
Information System (CDLIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Selden Fritschner, Chief, Commercial
Driver’s License Division, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC
20590. E-mail:
selden.fritschner@dot.gov, Telephone:
202–366–0677.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 202 of the Motor Carrier
Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (PL
106–159) requires that whenever an
individual is convicted of certain traffic
offenses in a State, and the individual
has a commercial driver’s license (CDL)
issued by another State, the State of
Conviction (SOC) must notify the
driver’s State of Record (SOR) in a
timely manner. This includes all
convictions (as defined in 49 CFR
383.5), in any type of motor vehicle,
involving a State or local law relating to
motor vehicle traffic control (other than
a parking violation). This also includes
some convictions listed in 49 CFR
383.51 that are not directly related to
motor vehicle traffic control but that are
deemed critical to ensuring highway
safety.
On July 31, 2002, FMCSA published
a final rule (67 FR 49761) requiring
SOCs to begin notifying a driver’s SOR
within 30 days for all convictions
occurring after September 30, 2005.
Beginning September 30, 2008, the
SOCs were required to report
convictions to the SORs within 10 days
(49 CFR 384.209).
In July 2009, the Department of
Transportation’s Office of Inspector
General released the report Audit of the
Data Integrity of the Commercial
Driver’s License Information System) as
required by the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA–LU)
(Pub. L. 109–59). In preparing this
report, OIG evaluated several factors
related to CDLIS, including the
timeliness of convictions received from
courts and posted by State driver
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
licensing agencies. In its CDLIS report,
OIG estimated that 500,000 active CDL
holders have convictions on their driver
history record (DHR) from States other
than their SOR. The OIG further
estimated that up to 20 percent of those
CDL holders have convictions on their
DHR that were not reported to their SOR
and posted in a timely manner.
This reporting delay reduces highway
safety by enabling CDL holders
convicted of disqualifying offenses to
continue driving without being detected
by roadside inspection officials. These
delays also make it difficult for motor
carriers to identify and remove from
service drivers who have been convicted
of disqualifying offenses. In some
instances, this includes drivers who
have been convicted of multiple major
traffic offenses and who should be
disqualified from holding a CDL for life.
As part of its mission to reduce the
number of fatalities, injuries, and
crashes involving large trucks and
buses, and as part of its responsibility to
ensure State compliance with the
minimum CDL program standards
established by Federal regulations,
FMCSA provides this notice and
guidance to all SDLAs on the conviction
reporting requirements.
II. Requirements
Whenever a CDL holder, or a person
operating a CMV who is required to
have a CDL, is convicted of a traffic
offense in a State other than the State in
which he or she is licensed, the SOC
must notify the SOR within 10 days of
the conviction (See 49 CFR 384.209).
Whenever a CDL holder is
disqualified or has his driving privileges
withdrawn or suspended from operating
a CMV for longer than 60 days in a State
other than the State in which he or she
is licensed, the State of Withdrawal
must notify the SOR within 10 days of
the disqualification action. This
notification must include information
related to the disqualification and the
violation that resulted in the
disqualification, or suspension (See 49
CFR 384.208).
Whenever a SDLA receives
notification of a conviction or
disqualification from another State, it
must post the information to the DHR
within 10 days of receipt (See 49 CFR
384.225(c) (1)). Further, whenever a
SDLA receives notification of a
conviction occurring within the same
State, it must post the information to the
DHR within 10 days of the conviction
(See 49 CFR 384.225(c) (2)).
Guidance
FMCSA provides the following
guidance to States on how to come into
PO 00000
Frm 00149
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
compliance with the provisions of the
Federal regulations related to the timely
reporting and posting of convictions and
disqualifications.
I. Incoming Conviction Reports on Paper
SDLAs that receive conviction data
from courts on paper (either direct
mailing of the traffic citation with the
disposition indicated or conviction
summary reports generated by the
courts) have several options to expedite
processing:
• Sort incoming conviction data and
prioritize handling for any conviction
that indicates the violation involved a
CDL holder, a CMV that requires the
driver to hold a CDL, hazardous
material, or a passenger CMV
(collectively hereafter referred to as
CDL/CMV convictions);
• Designate certain data entry
personnel within the SDLA to process
CDL/CMV convictions exclusively, or as
their highest priority when such data is
received;
• Request that courts pre-sort CDL/
CMV conviction data and provide
special markings when reporting it to
the SDLA (see section III for further
information);
• Request that courts send conviction
data related to CDL/CMV convictions as
soon as practicable after disposition (the
same day if possible);
• Prioritize the correction of any
internal or external data entry errors
that involve CDL/CMV convictions;
• Explore options for expedited
delivery of CDL/CMV conviction data to
the SDLA; and
• Explore options for an electronic
conviction transmission system (see
section II for further information).
II. Incoming Conviction Reports via
Electronic Transmission
SDLAs that receive CDL/CMV
conviction data from courts by an
electronic conviction transmission
system are at an advantage. The data
entry is already completed and can be
posted to the driver’s record with
minimal effort, and the actual
transmission of the information is either
instantaneous or submitted daily
through a batch process. SDLAs can
expedite processing electronic
transmission further if they:
• Request that courts process
dispositions for CDL/CMV offenses into
their case management systems the
same day as the final determination;
• Request that courts alter their case
management systems to transmit CDL/
CMV conviction data to the SDLA on a
daily basis (rather than weekly or
monthly);
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices
• Prioritize the correction of any
transmission or processing errors
involving CDL/CMV convictions;
• Work to ensure that all courts use
electronic transmission of CDL/CMV
convictions if it is an available
alternative; and
• Continuously improve the
electronic conviction transmission
system to take advantage of emerging
technological advances.
III. Judicial Outreach
SDLAs should strengthen their
partnerships with the courts in their
jurisdiction to bring about greater
success in achieving compliance with
the reporting requirements. SDLAs can
take several steps to help strengthen
these partnerships and their judicial
outreach efforts if they:
• Determine which court personnel
are most responsible for ensuring that
information related to CDL/CMV
offenses are transmitted to the SDLA in
a timely manner; this may be the Judge,
the Clerk of Court’s Office, or the
Prosecutor;
• Designate an individual or
organizational unit within the SDLA as
having responsibility to engage in
judicial outreach activities;
• Ensure that all involved personnel
understand the importance of timely
conviction reporting. FMCSA evaluates
compliance of the SDLA and all
involved entities that impact the State’s
CDL program and contribute to
compliance with the requirements of 49
CFR part 384;
• Engage in proactive steps to discuss
process improvement, including site
visits, routine e-mails or newsletters,
and presentations at State or regional
conferences;
• Request assistance in outreach
efforts from other State level agencies
and organizations if appropriate (e.g.,
Administrative Office of the Courts, the
Governor’s Highway Safety Office,
Associations/Counsels for judges,
clerks, and prosecutors); and
• Request from FMCSA information
and guidance on judicial training.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Utilize CDLIS
CDLIS has the capability to transmit
conviction and disqualification
information to other States. All States
now have the ability to receive these
convictions and disqualifications
electronically. States should utilize this
functionality whenever possible to
expedite the transmission and final
posting of CDL/CMV convictions and
disqualifications.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:27 Jul 01, 2010
Jkt 220001
V. Statutory Reporting Periods
If State statutes address the timely
reporting and posting of convictions,
they must not conflict with the
applicable Federal regulations (this
includes court reporting convictions to
the SDLA, the SDLA reporting out-ofState convictions to the SOR, or the
SDLA posting in-State convictions to
the DHR).
Some States have statutory or due
process requirements that prevent
courts from sending a conviction to the
SDLA immediately upon disposition.
This requirement generally allows for
appeals or other procedural actions
prior to the State posting the conviction
to the DHR or sending it to the SOR.
States reported to FMCSA that these
mandatory holding periods negatively
impact their ability to comply with the
timeliness requirements. In these
instances, FMCSA stands ready to
discuss the requirements unique to each
State and discuss alternatives that may
reduce or eliminate the negative impact
to the State’s compliance.
VI. Funding
SDLAs have secured various funding
sources for electronic conviction
reporting systems, including fees
assessed against those convicted of
traffic offenses, direct appropriation in
the State’s budget, or through other
available revenue. The FMCSA
encourages SDLAs to engage in direct
communication with other SDLAs to
solicit ideas and implementation
strategies.
States also have the option of
requesting grants from various Federal
agencies, including FMCSA’s CDL
Program Improvement grant (CDLPI).
While CDLPI grants cannot fund an
entire statewide electronic conviction
system, and cannot be used to support
any effort indefinitely, States can
request financial assistance to establish
demonstration projects and other proofof-concept efforts that can help SDLAs
secure additional funding through other
means.
Compliance
FMCSA takes seriously its
responsibility to ensure State
compliance with all provisions of 49
CFR part 384, especially those involving
the timely reporting and posting of
convictions and disqualifications.
FMCSA will work with the States to the
greatest extent practicable to address the
findings in the OIG report and to ensure
compliance by using available
electronic reporting and manual
auditing methods. FMCSA will examine
these reports and conduct audits
PO 00000
Frm 00150
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38605
independently of any established
evaluation cycle or review process.
FMCSA will begin posting maps and
matrices providing details regarding
State compliance with timeliness
requirements on the FMCSA Web site in
the third quarter of fiscal year 2010.
FMCSA will post this information
quarterly. States should review this
status information to determine the
scope of the efforts needed to come into
compliance.
Issued on: June 23, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–16218 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Surface Transportation Environment
and Planning Cooperative Research
Program (STEP)
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Section 5207 of the Safe,
Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for
Users (SAFETEA–LU) established the
Surface Transportation Environment
and Planning Cooperative Research
Program (STEP). The FHWA anticipates
that the STEP or a similar program to
provide resources for national research
on issues related to planning,
environment, and realty will be
included in future surface
transportation legislation. In Fiscal Year
(FY) 2011, the FHWA expects to seek
partnerships that can leverage limited
research funding in the STEP with other
stakeholders and partners in order to
increase the total amount of resources
available to meet the Nation’s surface
transportation research needs.
The purpose of this notice is to
announce revisions to the STEP
implementation strategy for FY 2011
and to request suggested lines of
research for the FY 2011 STEP via the
STEP Web site at https://
www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/step/index.htm
in anticipation of future surface
transportation legislation.
DATES: Suggestions for lines of research
should be submitted to the STEP Web
site on or before September 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Felicia Young, Office of Interstate and
Border Planning, (202) 366–1263,
Felicia.young@dot.gov; or Grace Reidy,
Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366–
6226; Federal Highway Administration,
E:\FR\FM\02JYN1.SGM
02JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 127 (Friday, July 2, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38603-38605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-16218]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
State Responsibility for the Timely Reporting and Posting of
Certain Convictions and Disqualifications Involving Commercial Driver's
License Holders
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, DOT.
[[Page 38604]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration announces
guidance to State driver licensing agencies (SDLAs) to support their
efforts at achieving compliance with the Federal Commercial Driver's
license (CDL) rules concerning timely reporting and posting of
convictions for traffic offenses. This action is in response to the
Department of Transportation Office of the Inspector General's (OIG)
2009 report Audit of the Data Integrity of the Commercial Driver's
License Information System (CDLIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Selden Fritschner, Chief, Commercial
Driver's License Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590. E-mail:
selden.fritschner@dot.gov, Telephone: 202-366-0677.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 202 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 (PL
106-159) requires that whenever an individual is convicted of certain
traffic offenses in a State, and the individual has a commercial
driver's license (CDL) issued by another State, the State of Conviction
(SOC) must notify the driver's State of Record (SOR) in a timely
manner. This includes all convictions (as defined in 49 CFR 383.5), in
any type of motor vehicle, involving a State or local law relating to
motor vehicle traffic control (other than a parking violation). This
also includes some convictions listed in 49 CFR 383.51 that are not
directly related to motor vehicle traffic control but that are deemed
critical to ensuring highway safety.
On July 31, 2002, FMCSA published a final rule (67 FR 49761)
requiring SOCs to begin notifying a driver's SOR within 30 days for all
convictions occurring after September 30, 2005. Beginning September 30,
2008, the SOCs were required to report convictions to the SORs within
10 days (49 CFR 384.209).
In July 2009, the Department of Transportation's Office of
Inspector General released the report Audit of the Data Integrity of
the Commercial Driver's License Information System) as required by the
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) (Pub. L. 109-59). In preparing this
report, OIG evaluated several factors related to CDLIS, including the
timeliness of convictions received from courts and posted by State
driver licensing agencies. In its CDLIS report, OIG estimated that
500,000 active CDL holders have convictions on their driver history
record (DHR) from States other than their SOR. The OIG further
estimated that up to 20 percent of those CDL holders have convictions
on their DHR that were not reported to their SOR and posted in a timely
manner.
This reporting delay reduces highway safety by enabling CDL holders
convicted of disqualifying offenses to continue driving without being
detected by roadside inspection officials. These delays also make it
difficult for motor carriers to identify and remove from service
drivers who have been convicted of disqualifying offenses. In some
instances, this includes drivers who have been convicted of multiple
major traffic offenses and who should be disqualified from holding a
CDL for life. As part of its mission to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes involving large trucks and buses, and
as part of its responsibility to ensure State compliance with the
minimum CDL program standards established by Federal regulations, FMCSA
provides this notice and guidance to all SDLAs on the conviction
reporting requirements.
II. Requirements
Whenever a CDL holder, or a person operating a CMV who is required
to have a CDL, is convicted of a traffic offense in a State other than
the State in which he or she is licensed, the SOC must notify the SOR
within 10 days of the conviction (See 49 CFR 384.209).
Whenever a CDL holder is disqualified or has his driving privileges
withdrawn or suspended from operating a CMV for longer than 60 days in
a State other than the State in which he or she is licensed, the State
of Withdrawal must notify the SOR within 10 days of the
disqualification action. This notification must include information
related to the disqualification and the violation that resulted in the
disqualification, or suspension (See 49 CFR 384.208).
Whenever a SDLA receives notification of a conviction or
disqualification from another State, it must post the information to
the DHR within 10 days of receipt (See 49 CFR 384.225(c) (1)). Further,
whenever a SDLA receives notification of a conviction occurring within
the same State, it must post the information to the DHR within 10 days
of the conviction (See 49 CFR 384.225(c) (2)).
Guidance
FMCSA provides the following guidance to States on how to come into
compliance with the provisions of the Federal regulations related to
the timely reporting and posting of convictions and disqualifications.
I. Incoming Conviction Reports on Paper
SDLAs that receive conviction data from courts on paper (either
direct mailing of the traffic citation with the disposition indicated
or conviction summary reports generated by the courts) have several
options to expedite processing:
Sort incoming conviction data and prioritize handling for
any conviction that indicates the violation involved a CDL holder, a
CMV that requires the driver to hold a CDL, hazardous material, or a
passenger CMV (collectively hereafter referred to as CDL/CMV
convictions);
Designate certain data entry personnel within the SDLA to
process CDL/CMV convictions exclusively, or as their highest priority
when such data is received;
Request that courts pre-sort CDL/CMV conviction data and
provide special markings when reporting it to the SDLA (see section III
for further information);
Request that courts send conviction data related to CDL/
CMV convictions as soon as practicable after disposition (the same day
if possible);
Prioritize the correction of any internal or external data
entry errors that involve CDL/CMV convictions;
Explore options for expedited delivery of CDL/CMV
conviction data to the SDLA; and
Explore options for an electronic conviction transmission
system (see section II for further information).
II. Incoming Conviction Reports via Electronic Transmission
SDLAs that receive CDL/CMV conviction data from courts by an
electronic conviction transmission system are at an advantage. The data
entry is already completed and can be posted to the driver's record
with minimal effort, and the actual transmission of the information is
either instantaneous or submitted daily through a batch process. SDLAs
can expedite processing electronic transmission further if they:
Request that courts process dispositions for CDL/CMV
offenses into their case management systems the same day as the final
determination;
Request that courts alter their case management systems to
transmit CDL/CMV conviction data to the SDLA on a daily basis (rather
than weekly or monthly);
[[Page 38605]]
Prioritize the correction of any transmission or
processing errors involving CDL/CMV convictions;
Work to ensure that all courts use electronic transmission
of CDL/CMV convictions if it is an available alternative; and
Continuously improve the electronic conviction
transmission system to take advantage of emerging technological
advances.
III. Judicial Outreach
SDLAs should strengthen their partnerships with the courts in their
jurisdiction to bring about greater success in achieving compliance
with the reporting requirements. SDLAs can take several steps to help
strengthen these partnerships and their judicial outreach efforts if
they:
Determine which court personnel are most responsible for
ensuring that information related to CDL/CMV offenses are transmitted
to the SDLA in a timely manner; this may be the Judge, the Clerk of
Court's Office, or the Prosecutor;
Designate an individual or organizational unit within the
SDLA as having responsibility to engage in judicial outreach
activities;
Ensure that all involved personnel understand the
importance of timely conviction reporting. FMCSA evaluates compliance
of the SDLA and all involved entities that impact the State's CDL
program and contribute to compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR
part 384;
Engage in proactive steps to discuss process improvement,
including site visits, routine e-mails or newsletters, and
presentations at State or regional conferences;
Request assistance in outreach efforts from other State
level agencies and organizations if appropriate (e.g., Administrative
Office of the Courts, the Governor's Highway Safety Office,
Associations/Counsels for judges, clerks, and prosecutors); and
Request from FMCSA information and guidance on judicial
training.
IV. Utilize CDLIS
CDLIS has the capability to transmit conviction and
disqualification information to other States. All States now have the
ability to receive these convictions and disqualifications
electronically. States should utilize this functionality whenever
possible to expedite the transmission and final posting of CDL/CMV
convictions and disqualifications.
V. Statutory Reporting Periods
If State statutes address the timely reporting and posting of
convictions, they must not conflict with the applicable Federal
regulations (this includes court reporting convictions to the SDLA, the
SDLA reporting out-of-State convictions to the SOR, or the SDLA posting
in-State convictions to the DHR).
Some States have statutory or due process requirements that prevent
courts from sending a conviction to the SDLA immediately upon
disposition. This requirement generally allows for appeals or other
procedural actions prior to the State posting the conviction to the DHR
or sending it to the SOR. States reported to FMCSA that these mandatory
holding periods negatively impact their ability to comply with the
timeliness requirements. In these instances, FMCSA stands ready to
discuss the requirements unique to each State and discuss alternatives
that may reduce or eliminate the negative impact to the State's
compliance.
VI. Funding
SDLAs have secured various funding sources for electronic
conviction reporting systems, including fees assessed against those
convicted of traffic offenses, direct appropriation in the State's
budget, or through other available revenue. The FMCSA encourages SDLAs
to engage in direct communication with other SDLAs to solicit ideas and
implementation strategies.
States also have the option of requesting grants from various
Federal agencies, including FMCSA's CDL Program Improvement grant
(CDLPI). While CDLPI grants cannot fund an entire statewide electronic
conviction system, and cannot be used to support any effort
indefinitely, States can request financial assistance to establish
demonstration projects and other proof-of-concept efforts that can help
SDLAs secure additional funding through other means.
Compliance
FMCSA takes seriously its responsibility to ensure State compliance
with all provisions of 49 CFR part 384, especially those involving the
timely reporting and posting of convictions and disqualifications.
FMCSA will work with the States to the greatest extent practicable to
address the findings in the OIG report and to ensure compliance by
using available electronic reporting and manual auditing methods. FMCSA
will examine these reports and conduct audits independently of any
established evaluation cycle or review process. FMCSA will begin
posting maps and matrices providing details regarding State compliance
with timeliness requirements on the FMCSA Web site in the third quarter
of fiscal year 2010. FMCSA will post this information quarterly. States
should review this status information to determine the scope of the
efforts needed to come into compliance.
Issued on: June 23, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-16218 Filed 7-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P