Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Increased Assessment Rate, 37740-37742 [2010-15941]
Download as PDF
37740
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 125
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–10–0050; FV10–922–1
PR]
Apricots Grown in Designated
Counties in Washington; Increased
Assessment Rate
cprice-sewell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Washington Apricot Marketing
Committee (Committee) for the 2010–11
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$1.00 to $1.50 per ton for Washington
apricots. The Committee is responsible
for local administration of the marketing
order regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington. Assessments upon
handlers of apricots are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal period for the marketing order
begins April 1 and ends March 31. The
assessment rate would remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified, suspended
or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
regarding this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938; or Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments should
reference the docket number and the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register and will be
available for public inspection in the
Office of the Docket Clerk during regular
business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
comments submitted in response to this
rule will be included in the record and
will be made available to the public.
Please be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Curry or Gary Olson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220
SW. Third Avenue, suite 385, Portland,
OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326–2724;
Fax: (503) 326–7440; or E-mail:
Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 690–
3919; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
922 (7 CFR part 922), as amended,
regulating the handling of apricots
grown in designated counties in
Washington, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, apricot handlers in designated
counties in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the
order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable
Washington apricots beginning April 1,
2010, and continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2010–11 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to
$1.50 per ton for Washington apricots
handled under the order.
The order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
producers and handlers of apricots in
designated counties in Washington.
They are familiar with the Committee’s
needs and with the costs for goods and
services in their local area and are thus
in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed at a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2009–10 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and the USDA approved, an assessment
rate of $1.00 per ton of apricots handled.
This rate continues in effect from fiscal
period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 19, 2010,
and unanimously recommended 2010–
11 expenditures of $8,145. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $7,843. In addition,
the Committee recommended that the
$1.00 per ton assessment rate be
increased by $0.50 to $1.50 per ton of
apricots handled. Committee members
reported that apricot production this
season may be lower than that of last
season since portions of the Washington
apricot production area experienced
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
cprice-sewell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules
freezing weather in October 2009, and
high winds in April of this year. As a
result, the Committee has estimated that
shipments of fresh apricots will
approximate 5,550 tons this season—
somewhat less than the 6,860 tons of
fresh apricots reported last season. The
Committee thus recommended that the
assessment rate be increased by $0.50 to
help ensure that budgeted expenses are
adequately covered.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 fiscal period include $4,800 for
the management fee, $1,300 for
Committee travel, $100 for compliance,
$750 for the annual audit review, and
$1,195 for equipment maintenance,
insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous
expenses. In comparison, major
expenditures for the 2009–10 fiscal
period included $4,800 for the
management service fee, $1,000 for
travel, $100 for compliance, and $1,943
for audits, insurance and bonds,
equipment maintenance and
miscellaneous expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by dividing
the anticipated expenses of $8,145 by
the projected 2010 apricot production of
5,550 tons. Applying the $1.50 per ton
recommended assessment rate to this
crop estimate should provide $8,325 in
assessment income. Funds in the
Committee’s monetary reserve are
projected to be $7,854 on March 31,
2011. This is within the order’s limit of
approximately one fiscal period’s
operational expenses.
The proposed assessment rate would
continue in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA upon recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would
be effective for an indefinite period, the
Committee would continue to meet
prior to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of the Committee’s
meetings are available from the
Committee or USDA. The Committee’s
meetings are open to the public and
interested persons may express their
views at these meetings. USDA would
evaluate the Committee’s
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking would be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2010–11 budget and those
for subsequent fiscal periods would be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 94 apricot
producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22
regulated handlers. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (13 CFR
121.201) as those having annual receipts
of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,000,000.
The Washington Agricultural
Statistics Service reported that the total
8,500 ton Washington apricot utilization
(including both fresh and processed
markets) in 2009 sold for an average of
$888 per ton. The total 2009 farm-gate
value was approximately $7,551,000.
Based on the number of producers in
the production area (94), the average
annual producer revenue from the sale
of apricots in 2009 can thus be
estimated at approximately $80,330. In
addition, based on information from the
Committee and USDA’s Market News
Service, 2009 f.o.b. prices for WA No. 1
apricots ranged from $14.00 to $24.00
per 24-pound loose-pack container, and
from $12.00 to $22.00 for 2-layer tray
pack containers. The average 2009 price
across all sizes and packs was $17.50,
with an estimated industry gross intake
of approximately $10,913,636 in f.o.b.
receipts for the 2009 crop—leaving
average receipts for each of the 22
handlers well below the SBA’s
$7,000,000 threshold for small
businesses. Therefore, the majority of
producers and handlers of Washington
apricots may be classified as small
entities.
This rule would increase the
assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers
for the 2010–11 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $1.00 to $1.50 per ton for
apricots handled under the order’s
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37741
authority. The Committee also
unanimously recommended 2010–11
expenditures of $8,145. With a 2010–11
Washington apricot crop estimate of
5,550 fresh market tons, the Committee
anticipates assessment income of about
$8,325. The Committee recommended
the assessment rate increase to help
ensure that budgeted expenses are
adequately covered.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2010–11 fiscal period include $4,800 for
the management fee, $1,300 for
Committee travel, $100 for compliance,
$750 for the annual audit review, and
$1,195 for equipment maintenance,
insurance, bonds, and miscellaneous
expenses. In comparison, major
expenditures for the 2009–10 fiscal
period included $4,800 for the
management service fee, $1,000 for
travel, $100 for compliance, and $1,943
for audits, insurance and bonds,
equipment maintenance and
miscellaneous expenses. Funds in the
Committee’s monetary reserve are
projected to be $7,854 on March 31,
2011. This is within the order’s limit of
approximately one fiscal period’s
operational expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this recommended assessment
increase. Leaving the assessment rate at
the current $1.00 per ton would earn the
Committee $5,550, an amount
considerably less than the 2010
budgeted expenditures of $8,145. This
would have significantly depleted the
Committee’s reserves, and thus was not
seriously considered. The Committee
did not consider an assessment rate
greater than $1.50.
A review of historical crop and price
information, as well as preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
crop year indicates that the producer
price for the 2010–11 season could
average about $1,000 per ton for fresh
Washington apricots. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2010–11 fiscal period as a percentage of
total producer revenue is 0.15 percent
for Washington apricots.
This action would increase the
assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose
some additional costs on handlers, the
costs are minimal and uniform on all
handlers. Some of the additional costs
may be passed on to producers.
However, these costs would be offset by
the benefits derived by the operation of
the order.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Washington
apricot industry and all interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in Committee deliberations
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
cprice-sewell on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
37742
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 / Proposed Rules
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the May 19, 2010, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express views on the issues.
Additionally, interested persons are
invited to submit information on the
regulatory and informational impacts of
this action on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Washington apricot handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
Additionally, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplate
Data.do?template=TemplateN&page=
MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is
deemed appropriate because: (1) The
2010–11 fiscal period began on April 1,
2010, and the order requires that the
assessment rate for each fiscal period
apply to all assessable apricots handled
during such fiscal period; (2) the
Washington apricot harvest and
shipping season is expected to begin as
early as the last week of June; (3) the
Committee needs to have sufficient
funds to pay its expenses, which are
incurred on a continuous basis; and (4)
handlers are aware of this action, which
was recommended by the Committee at
a public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:03 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
[Docket No. 080724907–91435–01]
‘‘RIN–AE44’’ in the subject line of the
message.
Fax: (202) 482–3355. Please alert the
Regulatory Policy Division, by calling
(202) 482–2440, if you are faxing
comments.
Mail or Hand Deliver/Courier:
Sharron Cook, U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Regulatory Policy Division,
14th St. & Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230,
Attn: RIN–AE44.
Send comments regarding the
collection of information associated
with the rule, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to Jasmeet Seehra,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), by e-mail to
jseehra@omb.eop.gov, or by fax to (202)
395–7285; and to the U.S. Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Regulatory Policy Division,
14th St. & Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Room 2705, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Thompson, Sensors and Aviation
Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Telephone: (202) 482–4252.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 0694–AE44
Background
Addition of New Export Control
Classification Number 6A981 Passive
Infrasound Sensors to the Commerce
Control List of the Export
Administration Regulations, and
Related Amendments
The Bureau of Industry and Security
proposes to amend the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
imposing new foreign policy export and
reexport controls on certain infrasound
sensors (i.e., sensors capable of
detecting sound from 0.01 to 16 Hertz).
Infrasound sensors are used by the oil
exploration industry, meteorologists,
seismologists, and the military to detect
natural or man-made infrasound sources
including earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, rocket launch, and/or nuclear
explosions.
Passive infrasound sensors, which
possess civil and military utility, are not
currently specified in the CCL, but
similar sensors are subject to the EAR.
Today’s passive infrasound sensors have
updated electronics, which increase
their sensitivity and allow the detection
of additional infrasound sources.
Because of the enhanced capabilities of
current sensors, these passive
infrasound sensors have military and
commercial applications, and therefore
should be controlled under the EAR for
regional stability (RS) and antiterrorism
(AT) reasons.
BIS proposes to amend the EAR,
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774
(Commerce Control List), Category 6
(Sensors and Lasers) by adding Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
6A981. This new ECCN 6A981 would be
controlled for RS and AT reasons and
PART 922—APRICOTS GROWN IN
DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN
WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 922 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 922.235 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 922.235
Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2010, an
assessment rate of $1.50 per ton is
established for the Washington Apricot
Marketing Committee.
Dated: June 25, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–15941 Filed 6–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 742 and 774
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule, request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Industry and
Security proposes to amend the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
adding Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) 6A981 to the
Commerce Control List (CCL) to control
passive infrasound sensors because of
their military and commercial utility.
Items under this new ECCN will be
controlled for Regional Stability (RS)
and Anti-Terrorism (AT) reasons. In
addition, BIS proposes to control
technology and software for the
development, production, or use of
these items for RS and AT reasons
under revised ECCNs 6D991 and 6E991,
respectively.
DATES: Comments must be received by
August 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN–AE44 by any of the
following methods:
E-mail: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov
or via www.regulations.gov. Include
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 30, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37740-37742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15941]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 37740]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 922
[Doc. No. AMS-FV-10-0050; FV10-922-1 PR]
Apricots Grown in Designated Counties in Washington; Increased
Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule would increase the assessment rate established for
the Washington Apricot Marketing Committee (Committee) for the 2010-11
and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to $1.50 per ton for
Washington apricots. The Committee is responsible for local
administration of the marketing order regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington. Assessments upon
handlers of apricots are used by the Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period for the marketing
order begins April 1 and ends March 31. The assessment rate would
remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended or terminated.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
regarding this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and
the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and will
be available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk
during regular business hours, or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in response to this rule
will be included in the record and will be made available to the
public. Please be advised that the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be made public on the Internet at
the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Curry or Gary Olson, Northwest
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit
and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1220 SW. Third Avenue, suite 385,
Portland, OR 97204; Telephone: (503) 326-2724; Fax: (503) 326-7440; or
E-mail: Robert.Curry@ams.usda.gov or GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 690-3919; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or E-mail:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 922 (7 CFR part 922), as amended, regulating the handling of
apricots grown in designated counties in Washington, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, apricot
handlers in designated counties in Washington are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as proposed herein
would be applicable to all assessable Washington apricots beginning
April 1, 2010, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2010-11 and subsequent fiscal periods from $1.00 to
$1.50 per ton for Washington apricots handled under the order.
The order provides authority for the Committee, with the approval
of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers of apricots in designated counties
in Washington. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with
the costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and discussed at a public meeting. Thus,
all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2009-10 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate of $1.00 per ton
of apricots handled. This rate continues in effect from fiscal period
to fiscal period unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon
recommendation and information submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 19, 2010, and unanimously recommended
2010-11 expenditures of $8,145. In comparison, last year's budgeted
expenditures were $7,843. In addition, the Committee recommended that
the $1.00 per ton assessment rate be increased by $0.50 to $1.50 per
ton of apricots handled. Committee members reported that apricot
production this season may be lower than that of last season since
portions of the Washington apricot production area experienced
[[Page 37741]]
freezing weather in October 2009, and high winds in April of this year.
As a result, the Committee has estimated that shipments of fresh
apricots will approximate 5,550 tons this season--somewhat less than
the 6,860 tons of fresh apricots reported last season. The Committee
thus recommended that the assessment rate be increased by $0.50 to help
ensure that budgeted expenses are adequately covered.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $1,300 for
Committee travel, $100 for compliance, $750 for the annual audit
review, and $1,195 for equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and
miscellaneous expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2009-
10 fiscal period included $4,800 for the management service fee, $1,000
for travel, $100 for compliance, and $1,943 for audits, insurance and
bonds, equipment maintenance and miscellaneous expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
dividing the anticipated expenses of $8,145 by the projected 2010
apricot production of 5,550 tons. Applying the $1.50 per ton
recommended assessment rate to this crop estimate should provide $8,325
in assessment income. Funds in the Committee's monetary reserve are
projected to be $7,854 on March 31, 2011. This is within the order's
limit of approximately one fiscal period's operational expenses.
The proposed assessment rate would continue in effect indefinitely
unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation
and information submitted by the Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate would be effective for an indefinite
period, the Committee would continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of the Committee's meetings are available from the Committee or
USDA. The Committee's meetings are open to the public and interested
persons may express their views at these meetings. USDA would evaluate
the Committee's recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed.
Further rulemaking would be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's
2010-11 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods would be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 94 apricot producers within the regulated
production area and approximately 22 regulated handlers. Small
agricultural producers are defined by the Small Business Administration
(13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less than $750,000,
and small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,000,000.
The Washington Agricultural Statistics Service reported that the
total 8,500 ton Washington apricot utilization (including both fresh
and processed markets) in 2009 sold for an average of $888 per ton. The
total 2009 farm-gate value was approximately $7,551,000. Based on the
number of producers in the production area (94), the average annual
producer revenue from the sale of apricots in 2009 can thus be
estimated at approximately $80,330. In addition, based on information
from the Committee and USDA's Market News Service, 2009 f.o.b. prices
for WA No. 1 apricots ranged from $14.00 to $24.00 per 24-pound loose-
pack container, and from $12.00 to $22.00 for 2-layer tray pack
containers. The average 2009 price across all sizes and packs was
$17.50, with an estimated industry gross intake of approximately
$10,913,636 in f.o.b. receipts for the 2009 crop--leaving average
receipts for each of the 22 handlers well below the SBA's $7,000,000
threshold for small businesses. Therefore, the majority of producers
and handlers of Washington apricots may be classified as small
entities.
This rule would increase the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2010-11 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $1.00 to $1.50 per ton for apricots handled under
the order's authority. The Committee also unanimously recommended 2010-
11 expenditures of $8,145. With a 2010-11 Washington apricot crop
estimate of 5,550 fresh market tons, the Committee anticipates
assessment income of about $8,325. The Committee recommended the
assessment rate increase to help ensure that budgeted expenses are
adequately covered.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2010-11
fiscal period include $4,800 for the management fee, $1,300 for
Committee travel, $100 for compliance, $750 for the annual audit
review, and $1,195 for equipment maintenance, insurance, bonds, and
miscellaneous expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2009-
10 fiscal period included $4,800 for the management service fee, $1,000
for travel, $100 for compliance, and $1,943 for audits, insurance and
bonds, equipment maintenance and miscellaneous expenses. Funds in the
Committee's monetary reserve are projected to be $7,854 on March 31,
2011. This is within the order's limit of approximately one fiscal
period's operational expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this recommended assessment
increase. Leaving the assessment rate at the current $1.00 per ton
would earn the Committee $5,550, an amount considerably less than the
2010 budgeted expenditures of $8,145. This would have significantly
depleted the Committee's reserves, and thus was not seriously
considered. The Committee did not consider an assessment rate greater
than $1.50.
A review of historical crop and price information, as well as
preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming crop year indicates
that the producer price for the 2010-11 season could average about
$1,000 per ton for fresh Washington apricots. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2010-11 fiscal period as a percentage of
total producer revenue is 0.15 percent for Washington apricots.
This action would increase the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to producers. However, these costs
would be offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the order.
The Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout the
Washington apricot industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend and participate in Committee deliberations
[[Page 37742]]
on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 19, 2010, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on the issues. Additionally, interested persons are
invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational
impacts of this action on small businesses.
This proposed rule would impose no additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either small or large Washington apricot
handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. Additionally, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/ams.fetchTemplateData.do?template=TemplateN&page=MarketingOrdersSmallBusinessGuide. Any questions about the compliance guide should be sent to
Antoinette Carter at the previously mentioned address in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
A 15-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposed rule. Fifteen days is deemed appropriate
because: (1) The 2010-11 fiscal period began on April 1, 2010, and the
order requires that the assessment rate for each fiscal period apply to
all assessable apricots handled during such fiscal period; (2) the
Washington apricot harvest and shipping season is expected to begin as
early as the last week of June; (3) the Committee needs to have
sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are incurred on a
continuous basis; and (4) handlers are aware of this action, which was
recommended by the Committee at a public meeting and is similar to
other assessment rate actions issued in past years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 922
Apricots, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 922 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 922--APRICOTS GROWN IN DESIGNATED COUNTIES IN WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 922 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
2. Section 922.235 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 922.235 Assessment rate.
On or after April 1, 2010, an assessment rate of $1.50 per ton is
established for the Washington Apricot Marketing Committee.
Dated: June 25, 2010.
Rayne Pegg,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-15941 Filed 6-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P