White River National Forest, Colorado, Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental Impact Statement, 37749-37752 [2010-15871]
Download as PDF
37749
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 125
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service
Notice of Intent To Request an
Extension of a Currently Approved
Information Collection
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces the Agricultural
Research Service’s (ARS) intention to
request an extension of a currently
approved information collection, Form
AD–761, USDA Patent License
Application for Government Invention
that expires October 29, 2010.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before September 3, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to
June Blalock, USDA, ARS, Office of
Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside
Avenue, Room 4–1174, Beltsville,
Maryland 20705–5131; Telephone
Number 301–504–5989.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June
Blalock, USDA, ARS, Office of
Technology Transfer, 301–504–5989.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: USDA Patent License
Application for Government Invention.
OMB Number: 0518–0003.
Expiration Date of Approval: October
29, 2010.
Type of Request: To extend a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: The USDA patent licensing
program grants patent licenses to
qualified businesses and individuals
who wish to commercialize inventions
arising from federally supported
research. The objective of the program is
to use the patent system to promote the
utilization of inventions arising from
such research. The licensing of federally
owned inventions must be done in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
accordance with the terms, conditions
and procedures prescribed under 37
CFR part 404. Application for a license
must be addressed to the Federal agency
having custody of the invention.
Licenses may be granted only if the
license applicant has supplied the
Federal agency with a satisfactory plan
for the development and marketing of
the invention and with information
about the applicant’s capability to fulfill
the plan. 37 CFR 404.8 sets forth the
information which must be provided by
a license applicant. For the convenience
of the applicant, USDA has itemized the
information needed on Form AD–761,
and instructions for completing the form
are provided to the applicant. The
information submitted is used to
determine whether the applicant has
both a complete and sufficient plan for
developing and marketing the invention
and the necessary manufacturing,
marketing, technical and financial
resources to carry out the submitted
plan.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 3 hours per
response.
Description of Respondents:
Businesses or other for profit
individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
75.
Frequency of Responses: One time per
invention.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 225 hours.
This data will be collected under the
authority of 44 U.S.C. #3506(c)(2)(A).
Copies of this information collection
and related instructions can be obtained
without charge from June Blalock,
USDA, ARS, Office of Technology
Transfer by calling 301–504–5989.
Comments are invited on (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, such as
through the use of appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Comments may be sent to USDA,
ARS, Office of Technology Transfer,
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4–1174,
Beltsville, Maryland 20705–5131. All
responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–15815 Filed 6–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
White River National Forest, Colorado,
Oil and Gas Leasing Environmental
Impact Statement
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The White River National
Forest (WRNF) is initiating the
preparation of an environmental impact
statement (EIS). The EIS will disclose
the potential effects of a proposal to
revise the existing WRNF 1993 Oil and
Gas Leasing and Final EIS and Record
of Decision. The proposed revision
includes the following: Changing what
lands will be available for oil and gas
leasing; changing or adding stipulations
to be attached to oil and gas leases for
the protection of other resources; and
amending the WRNF Land and Resource
Management Plan 2002 Revision (Forest
Plan) to incorporate the revised oil and
gas leasing decision. The EIS will
document changed conditions and new
information since the WRNF 1993 Oil
and Gas Leasing Final EIS and Record
of Decision and incorporate that
information into the analysis of
potential effects of leasing on other
resources. Changes in conditions and
information since the 1993 leasing EIS
and decision include the completion of
the WRNF Forest Plan; new and
improved oil and gas drilling,
completion, and production technology;
an increase in demand and public need
for oil and natural gas; the increasing
rate of oil and gas development adjacent
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
37750
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 / Notices
to and on the WRNF, and a projection
of substantial increase in oil and gas
development on the WRNF.
The EIS will address current
applicable guidance, policy, regulation,
and law pertinent to roadless areas, land
ownership, and threatened, endangered,
and sensitive species. The scope of the
analysis is forest-wide.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by July
30, 2010. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected January
2011 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected April
2011.
The public open house date is:
1. Wednesday, 14 July 2010, 2:30 p.m.
to 8 p.m., Silt, CO.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
White River National Forest Oil and Gas
Scoping, P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento,
CA 95812; Submit electronic comments
and other data to WRNFoilandgas
comments@fscomments.org. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for other
information about electronic and fax
filing.
The public meeting location is the
following:
1. Silt, CO—Bureau of Land
Management Colorado River Valley
Field Office, Silt Conference Room,
2300 River Frontage Road, Silt, CO
81652.
For further information on this project
please visit https://www.fs.fed.us/r2/
whiteriver/projects/.
For additional information, mail
correspondence to David Francomb,
Leasable Minerals Program Manager,
White River National Forest, 900 Grand
Ave., P.O. Box 948, Glenwood Springs,
Colorado 81602.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Francomb, 970.945.3293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Need for Action
The White River National Forest
(WRNF) issued its current oil and gas
leasing availability decision in 1993 (Oil
and Gas Leasing Final Environmental
Impact Statement and Record of
Decision). Since 1993, information and
circumstances considered for that
decision have changed, including the
WRNF issuance of a revised Land and
Resource Management Plan (LRMP),
technological advances in oil and gas
exploration and development that
expand development potential of
previously uneconomic resources, and
increased level of projected oil and gas
development activities on the WRNF.
Consequently, the Forest Supervisor of
the WRNF has identified a need to: (1)
Revise the 1993 Oil and Gas Leasing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Final Environmental Impact Statement
and Record of Decision as necessary to
address information and circumstances
that are new and different from those
analyzed for the existing (1993) oil and
gas leasing decision; (2) Identify what
NFS lands administered by the White
River National Forest will continue to
be available for oil and gas leasing and
what lease stipulations should apply to
those lands for the protection of other
resources; (3) Amend the WRNF Land
and Resource Management Plan—2002
Revision to ensure consistency with the
oil and gas leasing analysis and
decision; and (4) Produce an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
that will support the BLM’s
independent decision to include NFS
lands administered by the WRNF in
future competitive oil and gas lease
sales.
Purpose for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to: (1) Ensure oil and gas leasing
availability and lease stipulations are
consistent with the WRNF Land and
Resource Management Plan; (2) Ensure
oil and gas leasing availability and lease
stipulations are consistent with current
applicable laws and regulations; (3)
Enable the Forest Service and BLM to
respond to Expressions of Interest for oil
and gas leases representing the public’s
demand for energy, consistent with
statutory and regulatory direction; (4)
Fulfill the federal government’s policy
to ‘‘foster and encourage private
enterprise in the development of
economically sound and stable
industries, and in the orderly and
economic development of domestic
resources to help assure satisfaction of
industrial, security, and environmental
needs’’ (Mining and Minerals Policy Act
of 1970) while continuing to sustain the
land’s productivity for other uses and
capability to support biodiversity goals
(Forest Service Minerals Program
Policy); and (5) Enable the BLM to fully
exercise its discretionary authority to
offer and issue leases on NFS lands
administered by the WRNF.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to revise
the existing 1993 Oil and Gas Leasing
availability decision for the White River
National Forest (WRNF). The Proposed
Action makes revisions to the
availability of NFS lands administered
by the WRNF for oil and gas leasing and
to the stipulations on lands available for
lease in the Analysis Area. Lease
stipulations are proposed only on lands
identified as available for lease.
The Proposed Action includes the
following: (1) Addressing information
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and circumstances that are new and
different from those analyzed for the
1993 leasing decision; (2) Changing the
1993 leasing decision to identify
266,599 acres as administratively
available for oil and gas leasing; (3)
Attaching lease stipulations on future
leases, where needed on lands
identified as administratively available
for leasing, for the purpose of protecting
other resources including:—(a) No
Surface Occupancy (NSO) stipulations
for certain—Wallace Creek Wildlife
Seclusion Area; raptor species breeding
territories; threatened, endangered,
proposed or candidate species
populations and habitats; critical
bighorn sheep habitats; Colorado River
cutthroat and greenback trout habitat;
Battlement Reservoir watershed;
wetlands and fens; water influence
zones; municipal supply watersheds;
areas with known high and very high
geologic instability and/or slopes
> 50%; authorized sites and facilities;
summer non-motorized recreation and
special interest areas; very high and
high scenic integrity objective areas;
Research Natural Areas; and inventoried
roadless areas; (b) Controlled Surface
Use (CSU) stipulations for certain—big
game production areas, summer
concentration areas, and migration
corridors; big game winter ranges; road
density in watersheds with Colorado
River cutthroat trout conservation
populations; ground water resources;
known and/or potential habitats for
sensitive species; areas with potential
for geologic instability and/or slopes
30% to 50%; areas with erodible soils;
authorized sites and facilities;
designated winter groomed routes under
special use permit; moderate scenic
integrity objective areas and scenic
byways; high concern level travel
routes; communication sites; and plant
species of local concern; (c) Timing
Limitations (TL) for certain—big game
winter and summer concentration
ranges; and raptor species breeding
territories; (4) Changing the 1993 leasing
decision to identify 1,159,796 acres as
closed for oil and gas leasing through
management direction; (5) Changing the
1993 leasing decision to identify
857,512 acres as legally closed for oil
and gas leasing; (6) Amending the 2002
WRNF Forest Plan to incorporate the
new leasing decision.
The proposed changes to the existing
1993 leasing decision brought forward
in the Proposed Action will not affect
the terms of existing leases. Existing
leases will remain in effect, with their
existing terms, until they are
terminated, relinquished, or cancelled.
Proposed land availability and lease
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 / Notices
stipulation changes will affect only
leases issued after the decision is
implemented. The proposed changes
will apply to new leases on lands that
are currently leased after existing leases
have been terminated, relinquished, or
cancelled, and those lands are
subsequently nominated for lease.
Possible Alternatives
(1) No New Leasing—Under this
alternative, no NFS lands administered
by the WRNF would be available in the
future for oil and gas leasing. Operations
on existing leases would continue under
applicable lease terms, statutory and
regulatory direction, and Forest Plan
direction. Existing federal oil and gas
leases on the WRNF that are not
extended by production would
terminate at the conclusion of their
primary term, and those lands would
not be available for further leasing.
Implementation of this alternative
would require a Forest Plan amendment
to identify lands as closed to oil and gas
leasing.
(2) No Action (Current
Management)—This alternative would
continue oil and gas leasing on the
WRNF as directed by the RODs for the
White River National Forest Oil and Gas
Leasing EIS (May 26, 1993) and the
Land and Resource Management Plan
2002 Revision (April 2, 2002).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Service is the lead agency.
As the agency responsible for offering,
selling, and issuing leases, the BLM will
participate as a cooperating agency
under a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU). Additionally, the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Colorado Department of Natural
Resources will participate as
cooperating agencies, under separate
MOUs, to provide resource specific
expertise when needed.
Responsible Official
The Forest Service responsible official
is Scott Fitzwilliams, Forest Supervisor,
White River National Forest, 900 Grand
Avenue, P.O. Box 948, Glenwood
Springs, Colorado 81602.
The BLM responsible official
responsible is Jamie, C. Connell, District
Manager, Northwest District Office,
2815 H Road, Grand Junction, Colorado
81506.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service will determine
whether and how the current oil and gas
leasing decision, as it relates to land
availability and lease stipulations,
should be changed based on current
information and analysis. The Forest
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
Supervisor will decide which lands
administered by the WRNF will be
administratively available for oil and
gas leasing, which lands will be closed
for oil and gas leasing through
management direction or legal reasons,
and what lease stipulations will be
applied to future oil and gas leases for
the protection of other resources [36
CFR 228.102(c)]. Subsequent to the
Forest Supervisor’s decision, the
Regional Forester will authorize the
BLM to offer specific lands for lease.
When lands are nominated for leasing,
the Forest Service will (1) Verify that
leasing the specific lands has been
adequately addressed in a NEPA
document and is consistent with the
Forest Plan, and that no significant new
information or circumstances would
require further environmental analysis;
(2) ensure that conditions of surface
occupancy are properly included as
stipulations in resulting leases; and (3)
determine that operations and
development could be allowed
somewhere on each proposed lease,
except where stipulations will prohibit
all surface occupancy [36 CFR
228.102(e)]. The BLM is responsible for
offering, selling, and issuing oil and gas
leases on NFS lands under the Mineral
Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, and
Federal Regulations at 43 CFR 3101.7.
The BLM State Director must decide
whether to offer for lease specific lands
authorized for leasing by the WRNF,
and must include Forest Service
stipulations on any leases offered on
NFS lands.
Scoping Process
The first formal opportunity to
comment on the revised oil and gas
leasing availability and stipulations
proposal is during the scoping process
(40 CFR 1501.7), which begins with the
issuance of this Notice of Intent. The
Forest Service requests comments on
the nature and scope of the
environmental, social, and economic
issues, and possible alternatives related
to oil and gas leasing on NFS lands
administered by the WRNF. The Forest
Service will work with tribal
governments to address issues that
would significantly or uniquely affect
them.
One open house meeting is planned.
The time the meeting will be held and
the address of the meeting location are
noted above under DATES and
ADDRESSES. The meeting location at the
Bureau of Land Management Silt Office
can be reached from the Silt exit (#97)
on Interstate 70. Exit onto 9th Street and
proceed over the interstate headed south
to the t-intersection. Take a left on River
Frontage Road headed east for about 1
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37751
mile to the BLM Silt Office on the right,
after the Holiday Inn Express Hotel.
Further information regarding this
meeting will be posted on the WRNF
Web site at https://www.fs.fed.us/r2/
whiteriver/projects as it becomes
available.
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping process that guides the
development of the WRNF Oil and Gas
Leasing Revision. Through the 1993 Oil
and Gas Leasing EIS and decision and
Forest Plan efforts, the WRNF has an
understanding of the broad range of
perspectives on the resource issues and
social values attributed to resource
activities on the WRNF. Consequently,
site-specific comments or concerns are
the most important types of information
needed for this EIS.
Send written comments to the address
noted above under ADDRESSES. Send
electronic comments to: WRNFoiland
gascomments@fscomments.org with the
subject clearly titled ‘‘WRNF Oil and
Gas Leasing EIS’’. Comments must
include the full name and physical
mailing address of the commenter, and
should indicate whether the commenter
would like to be informed of the
availability of the Oil and Gas Leasing
EIS. Submit faxed comments to
916.456.6724.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the DEIS is
expected to be 45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The Forest Service
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
37752
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 30, 2010 / Notices
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the scoping
comment period, 1 March 2010, so that
substantive comments and objections
are made available to the Forest Service
at a time when it can meaningfully
consider them and respond to them in
the final environmental impact
statement. To assist the Forest Service
in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action,
comments should be as specific as
possible.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21.
Dated: June 24, 2010.
Scott Fitzwilliams,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010–15871 Filed 6–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food Safety and Inspection Service
[Docket No. FSIS–2010–0019]
Measuring Progress on Food Safety:
Current Status and Future Directions;
Public Meeting
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Food Safety and Inspection
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
SUMMARY: This notice is announcing
that the Food Safety and Inspection
Service (FSIS), the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA), and the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), are jointly hosting two public
meetings to obtain stakeholder input.
The first is on July 21, 2010, in Chicago,
IL. The second will be held on October
20, 2010, in Portland, OR. The Agencies
are requesting information from all
stakeholders, including the regulated
food industry, State regulators, and
consumer groups, on appropriate
metrics to be used to assess performance
in food safety. The Agencies are also
interested in input on stakeholders’
understanding and perceptions of
metrics currently being used by the
Federal Agencies. Although the
Agencies are primarily interested in
obtaining stakeholder input, the
Agencies will present a limited amount
of background on the Food Safety
Working Group’s charge to create
meaningful metrics to measure the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:53 Jun 29, 2010
Jkt 220001
effectiveness of the Nation’s food safety
system and the Agency’s current
thinking on these issues.
DATES: The public meetings will be held
on Wednesday, July 21, 2010, 9 a.m. to
5 p.m. in Chicago, IL, and on October
20, 2010, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in Portland,
OR.
Any changes to public meeting dates,
times, location, and agenda will be
posted on the FSIS Web site and
announced in the Agency’s Constituent
Update.
For Registration Information Contact:
Jodee Warner, EDJ Associates, Inc.,
11300 Rockville Pike, Suite 1001,
Rockville, MD 20852, telephone: (240)
221–4296, Fax: (301) 945–4295, e-mail:
jwarner@edjassociates.com.
For general questions about the public
meeting, request to make an oral
presentation and submission of a
presentation, and for special
accommodations due to a disability,
contact: Juanita Yates, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, FDA,
(301) 436–1731, e-mail:
juanita.yates@fda.hhs.gov.
Due to limited space, we encourage
all persons who wish to attend the
public meeting, including those
requesting an opportunity to make an
oral presentation at the public meeting,
to register in advance.
We encourage attendees to register
electronically at https://www.fsis.usda.
gov/regulations_&_policies/2010_
Notices_Index/index.asp. You may also
register by fax, e-mail or telephone by
providing information, including:
Name, organization, address, telephone
number and e-mail address to the
Registration Contact (see For
Registration Information Contact).
First Public Meeting
July 21, 2010, 9 a.m.–5 p.m., Hyatt
Regency Chicago, 151 East Wacker
Drive, Chicago, IL 60601.
Please note the following important
deadlines:
July 6, 2010: Request To Make Oral
Presentation.
July 13, 2010: Advance Registration.
July 13, 2010: Request Special
Accommodations Due to Disability.
Second Public Meeting
October 20, 2010, 9 a.m.–5 p.m., The
Crowne Plaza Portland Downtown, 1441
NE Second Avenue, Portland, OR
97232.
Please note the following important
deadlines:
September 24, 2010: Request To Make
Oral Presentation.
October 8, 2010: Advance Registration.
October 8, 2010: Request Special
Accommodation Due to Disability.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All documents related to the public
meeting will be available for public
inspection in the FSIS Docket Room,
USDA, FSIS, Room 2–2127, George
Washington Carver Center, 5601
Sunnyside Avenue, Mailstop 5474,
Beltsville, MD 20705–5474 between
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, as soon as they become
available.
FDA: Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All
stakeholders in the U.S. food safety
system are pursuing major new efforts to
reduce foodborne illness that include
science-based preventive controls in
food production and processing. As
recommended by President Obama’s
Food Safety Working Group, one
element of the Federal Government’s
food safety initiatives includes regularly
assessing performance metrics for
measuring progress in reducing
foodborne illness. FSIS, FDA, and CDC
are collaborating to address the
methodological and data challenges
involved in the development of feasible
and effective food safety performance
metrics.
An initial 1-day public meeting on
measuring progress on food safety was
held on March 30, 2010, in Washington,
DC (75 FR 9232). The public meetings
announced in this notice are extensions
of that initial public workshop. A
transcript of the initial public workshop
held on March 30, 2010, is accessible at
https://www.regulations.gov. It may be
viewed at the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Room 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
I. Background
At our March 30, 2010, workshop,
FDA, FSIS, and CDC presented their
current thinking on performance
metrics. The Agencies presented
information on various epidemiological
and non-epidemiological measures for
food safety. Workshop participants
recommended that the Agencies provide
an opportunity for stakeholders to
provide more detail on their views
regarding metrics and on current
methods being used. Accordingly, the
Agencies will hold two regional public
meetings specifically to allow
stakeholders to make presentations on
metrics for food safety. The Agencies
will also provide updated information
about their use of metrics to measure
food safety.
The Agencies are interested in
gathering information on metrics from
members of industry, consumer groups,
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37749-37752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15871]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
White River National Forest, Colorado, Oil and Gas Leasing
Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The White River National Forest (WRNF) is initiating the
preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS). The EIS will
disclose the potential effects of a proposal to revise the existing
WRNF 1993 Oil and Gas Leasing and Final EIS and Record of Decision. The
proposed revision includes the following: Changing what lands will be
available for oil and gas leasing; changing or adding stipulations to
be attached to oil and gas leases for the protection of other
resources; and amending the WRNF Land and Resource Management Plan 2002
Revision (Forest Plan) to incorporate the revised oil and gas leasing
decision. The EIS will document changed conditions and new information
since the WRNF 1993 Oil and Gas Leasing Final EIS and Record of
Decision and incorporate that information into the analysis of
potential effects of leasing on other resources. Changes in conditions
and information since the 1993 leasing EIS and decision include the
completion of the WRNF Forest Plan; new and improved oil and gas
drilling, completion, and production technology; an increase in demand
and public need for oil and natural gas; the increasing rate of oil and
gas development adjacent
[[Page 37750]]
to and on the WRNF, and a projection of substantial increase in oil and
gas development on the WRNF.
The EIS will address current applicable guidance, policy,
regulation, and law pertinent to roadless areas, land ownership, and
threatened, endangered, and sensitive species. The scope of the
analysis is forest-wide.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by July 30, 2010. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
January 2011 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
April 2011.
The public open house date is:
1. Wednesday, 14 July 2010, 2:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., Silt, CO.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: White River National Forest Oil
and Gas Scoping, P.O. Box 1919, Sacramento, CA 95812; Submit electronic
comments and other data to WRNFoilandgascomments@fscomments.org. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for other information about electronic and
fax filing.
The public meeting location is the following:
1. Silt, CO--Bureau of Land Management Colorado River Valley Field
Office, Silt Conference Room, 2300 River Frontage Road, Silt, CO 81652.
For further information on this project please visit https://www.fs.fed.us/r2/whiteriver/projects/.
For additional information, mail correspondence to David Francomb,
Leasable Minerals Program Manager, White River National Forest, 900
Grand Ave., P.O. Box 948, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Francomb, 970.945.3293.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Need for Action
The White River National Forest (WRNF) issued its current oil and
gas leasing availability decision in 1993 (Oil and Gas Leasing Final
Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision). Since 1993,
information and circumstances considered for that decision have
changed, including the WRNF issuance of a revised Land and Resource
Management Plan (LRMP), technological advances in oil and gas
exploration and development that expand development potential of
previously uneconomic resources, and increased level of projected oil
and gas development activities on the WRNF. Consequently, the Forest
Supervisor of the WRNF has identified a need to: (1) Revise the 1993
Oil and Gas Leasing Final Environmental Impact Statement and Record of
Decision as necessary to address information and circumstances that are
new and different from those analyzed for the existing (1993) oil and
gas leasing decision; (2) Identify what NFS lands administered by the
White River National Forest will continue to be available for oil and
gas leasing and what lease stipulations should apply to those lands for
the protection of other resources; (3) Amend the WRNF Land and Resource
Management Plan--2002 Revision to ensure consistency with the oil and
gas leasing analysis and decision; and (4) Produce an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) that will support the BLM's independent decision
to include NFS lands administered by the WRNF in future competitive oil
and gas lease sales.
Purpose for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to: (1) Ensure oil and gas
leasing availability and lease stipulations are consistent with the
WRNF Land and Resource Management Plan; (2) Ensure oil and gas leasing
availability and lease stipulations are consistent with current
applicable laws and regulations; (3) Enable the Forest Service and BLM
to respond to Expressions of Interest for oil and gas leases
representing the public's demand for energy, consistent with statutory
and regulatory direction; (4) Fulfill the federal government's policy
to ``foster and encourage private enterprise in the development of
economically sound and stable industries, and in the orderly and
economic development of domestic resources to help assure satisfaction
of industrial, security, and environmental needs'' (Mining and Minerals
Policy Act of 1970) while continuing to sustain the land's productivity
for other uses and capability to support biodiversity goals (Forest
Service Minerals Program Policy); and (5) Enable the BLM to fully
exercise its discretionary authority to offer and issue leases on NFS
lands administered by the WRNF.
Proposed Action
The Forest Service proposes to revise the existing 1993 Oil and Gas
Leasing availability decision for the White River National Forest
(WRNF). The Proposed Action makes revisions to the availability of NFS
lands administered by the WRNF for oil and gas leasing and to the
stipulations on lands available for lease in the Analysis Area. Lease
stipulations are proposed only on lands identified as available for
lease.
The Proposed Action includes the following: (1) Addressing
information and circumstances that are new and different from those
analyzed for the 1993 leasing decision; (2) Changing the 1993 leasing
decision to identify 266,599 acres as administratively available for
oil and gas leasing; (3) Attaching lease stipulations on future leases,
where needed on lands identified as administratively available for
leasing, for the purpose of protecting other resources including:--(a)
No Surface Occupancy (NSO) stipulations for certain--Wallace Creek
Wildlife Seclusion Area; raptor species breeding territories;
threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate species populations and
habitats; critical bighorn sheep habitats; Colorado River cutthroat and
greenback trout habitat; Battlement Reservoir watershed; wetlands and
fens; water influence zones; municipal supply watersheds; areas with
known high and very high geologic instability and/or slopes > 50%;
authorized sites and facilities; summer non-motorized recreation and
special interest areas; very high and high scenic integrity objective
areas; Research Natural Areas; and inventoried roadless areas; (b)
Controlled Surface Use (CSU) stipulations for certain--big game
production areas, summer concentration areas, and migration corridors;
big game winter ranges; road density in watersheds with Colorado River
cutthroat trout conservation populations; ground water resources; known
and/or potential habitats for sensitive species; areas with potential
for geologic instability and/or slopes 30% to 50%; areas with erodible
soils; authorized sites and facilities; designated winter groomed
routes under special use permit; moderate scenic integrity objective
areas and scenic byways; high concern level travel routes;
communication sites; and plant species of local concern; (c) Timing
Limitations (TL) for certain--big game winter and summer concentration
ranges; and raptor species breeding territories; (4) Changing the 1993
leasing decision to identify 1,159,796 acres as closed for oil and gas
leasing through management direction; (5) Changing the 1993 leasing
decision to identify 857,512 acres as legally closed for oil and gas
leasing; (6) Amending the 2002 WRNF Forest Plan to incorporate the new
leasing decision.
The proposed changes to the existing 1993 leasing decision brought
forward in the Proposed Action will not affect the terms of existing
leases. Existing leases will remain in effect, with their existing
terms, until they are terminated, relinquished, or cancelled. Proposed
land availability and lease
[[Page 37751]]
stipulation changes will affect only leases issued after the decision
is implemented. The proposed changes will apply to new leases on lands
that are currently leased after existing leases have been terminated,
relinquished, or cancelled, and those lands are subsequently nominated
for lease.
Possible Alternatives
(1) No New Leasing--Under this alternative, no NFS lands
administered by the WRNF would be available in the future for oil and
gas leasing. Operations on existing leases would continue under
applicable lease terms, statutory and regulatory direction, and Forest
Plan direction. Existing federal oil and gas leases on the WRNF that
are not extended by production would terminate at the conclusion of
their primary term, and those lands would not be available for further
leasing. Implementation of this alternative would require a Forest Plan
amendment to identify lands as closed to oil and gas leasing.
(2) No Action (Current Management)--This alternative would continue
oil and gas leasing on the WRNF as directed by the RODs for the White
River National Forest Oil and Gas Leasing EIS (May 26, 1993) and the
Land and Resource Management Plan 2002 Revision (April 2, 2002).
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Forest Service is the lead agency. As the agency responsible
for offering, selling, and issuing leases, the BLM will participate as
a cooperating agency under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
Additionally, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the
Colorado Department of Natural Resources will participate as
cooperating agencies, under separate MOUs, to provide resource specific
expertise when needed.
Responsible Official
The Forest Service responsible official is Scott Fitzwilliams,
Forest Supervisor, White River National Forest, 900 Grand Avenue, P.O.
Box 948, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602.
The BLM responsible official responsible is Jamie, C. Connell,
District Manager, Northwest District Office, 2815 H Road, Grand
Junction, Colorado 81506.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Service will determine whether and how the current oil
and gas leasing decision, as it relates to land availability and lease
stipulations, should be changed based on current information and
analysis. The Forest Supervisor will decide which lands administered by
the WRNF will be administratively available for oil and gas leasing,
which lands will be closed for oil and gas leasing through management
direction or legal reasons, and what lease stipulations will be applied
to future oil and gas leases for the protection of other resources [36
CFR 228.102(c)]. Subsequent to the Forest Supervisor's decision, the
Regional Forester will authorize the BLM to offer specific lands for
lease. When lands are nominated for leasing, the Forest Service will
(1) Verify that leasing the specific lands has been adequately
addressed in a NEPA document and is consistent with the Forest Plan,
and that no significant new information or circumstances would require
further environmental analysis; (2) ensure that conditions of surface
occupancy are properly included as stipulations in resulting leases;
and (3) determine that operations and development could be allowed
somewhere on each proposed lease, except where stipulations will
prohibit all surface occupancy [36 CFR 228.102(e)]. The BLM is
responsible for offering, selling, and issuing oil and gas leases on
NFS lands under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, and
Federal Regulations at 43 CFR 3101.7. The BLM State Director must
decide whether to offer for lease specific lands authorized for leasing
by the WRNF, and must include Forest Service stipulations on any leases
offered on NFS lands.
Scoping Process
The first formal opportunity to comment on the revised oil and gas
leasing availability and stipulations proposal is during the scoping
process (40 CFR 1501.7), which begins with the issuance of this Notice
of Intent. The Forest Service requests comments on the nature and scope
of the environmental, social, and economic issues, and possible
alternatives related to oil and gas leasing on NFS lands administered
by the WRNF. The Forest Service will work with tribal governments to
address issues that would significantly or uniquely affect them.
One open house meeting is planned. The time the meeting will be
held and the address of the meeting location are noted above under
DATES and ADDRESSES. The meeting location at the Bureau of Land
Management Silt Office can be reached from the Silt exit (97)
on Interstate 70. Exit onto 9th Street and proceed over the interstate
headed south to the t-intersection. Take a left on River Frontage Road
headed east for about 1 mile to the BLM Silt Office on the right, after
the Holiday Inn Express Hotel. Further information regarding this
meeting will be posted on the WRNF Web site at https://www.fs.fed.us/r2/whiteriver/projects as it becomes available.
Comment Requested
This Notice of Intent initiates the scoping process that guides the
development of the WRNF Oil and Gas Leasing Revision. Through the 1993
Oil and Gas Leasing EIS and decision and Forest Plan efforts, the WRNF
has an understanding of the broad range of perspectives on the resource
issues and social values attributed to resource activities on the WRNF.
Consequently, site-specific comments or concerns are the most important
types of information needed for this EIS.
Send written comments to the address noted above under ADDRESSES.
Send electronic comments to: WRNFoilandgascomments@fscomments.org with
the subject clearly titled ``WRNF Oil and Gas Leasing EIS''. Comments
must include the full name and physical mailing address of the
commenter, and should indicate whether the commenter would like to be
informed of the availability of the Oil and Gas Leasing EIS. Submit
faxed comments to 916.456.6724.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the DEIS is expected to be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at
this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several
court rulings related to public participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to
the reviewer's position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power
Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the
courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986)
and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
[[Page 37752]]
rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the scoping comment period, 1 March
2010, so that substantive comments and objections are made available to
the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and
respond to them in the final environmental impact statement. To assist
the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues and concerns
on the proposed action, comments should be as specific as possible.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21.
Dated: June 24, 2010.
Scott Fitzwilliams,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-15871 Filed 6-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P