Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Dimmer and Fan Speed Switch Controls, 37453-37455 [2010-15710]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
4300 Military Road, NW., Washington,
DC 20015 which was published in the
Federal Register on June 14, 2010, Vol
75; Number 113.
The meeting will be held on July 19,
2010 at 8:30 a.m. The meeting is closed
to the public.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National
Institute of Child Health and Human
Development; Notice of Closed
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development
Special Emphasis Panel ‘‘STEM CELLS’’.
Date: July 20, 2010.
Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
(Telephone Conference Call)
Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski,
PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of
Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver
National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892,
301–435–6884, leszczyd@mail.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research;
93.865, Research for Mothers and Children;
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation
Research; 93.209, Contraception and
Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: June 22, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–15787 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Eye Institute; Amended Notice
of Meeting
Notice is hearby given of a chance in
the meeting of the National Eye Institute
Special Emphasis Panel, July 16, 2010,
8 a.m. to July 16, 2010, 5 p.m., Embassy
Suites Hotel, Chevy Chase Pavilion,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: June 22, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
Dated: June 23, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
37453
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[FR Doc. 2010–15781 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Center for Scientific Review; Notice of
Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel;
Fellowships: Cognition, Language and
Perception.
Date: July 12, 2010.
Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: InterContinental Mark Hopkins
Hotel, 999 California Street, San Francisco,
CA 94108.
Contact Person: Weijia Ni, PhD, Scientific
Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review,
National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge
Drive, Room 3184, MSC 7848, Bethesda, MD
20892, (301) 435–1507, niw@csr.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS)
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2010–15779 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final
Determination Concerning Dimmer and
Fan Speed Switch Controls
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
SUMMARY: This document provides
notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (‘‘CBP’’) has issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain dimmer and fan speed
switch controls which may be offered to
the United States Government under a
government procurement contract.
Based upon the facts presented, in the
final determination CBP concluded that
Mexico is the country of origin of the
dimmer and fan speed switch controls
for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was
issued on June 15, 2010. A copy of the
final determination is attached. Any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of
this final determination within July 29,
2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and
Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202–325–0041).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
hereby given that on June 15, 2010,
pursuant to subpart B of part 177,
Customs Regulations (19 CFR part 177,
subpart B), CBP issued a final
determination concerning the country of
origin of certain dimmer and fan speed
switch controls which may be offered to
the United States Government under a
government procurement contract. This
final determination, in HQ H098417,
was issued at the request of Pass &
Seymour, Inc. under procedures set
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B,
which implements Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511–18). In the final
determination, CBP concluded that,
based upon the facts presented, certain
articles will be substantially
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
37454
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
transformed in Mexico. Therefore, CBP
found that Mexico is the country of
origin of the finished articles for
purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations
(19 CFR 177.29), provides that notice of
final determinations shall be published
in the Federal Register within 60 days
of the date the final determination is
issued. Section 177.30, CBP Regulations
(19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR
177.22(d), may seek judicial review of a
final determination within 30 days of
publication of such determination in the
Federal Register.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
Dated: June 15, 2010.
George F. McCray,
Acting Executive Director, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
HQ H098417
June 15, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS H098417 KSG
Daniel B. Berman, Esq.
Hancock & Estabrook LLP
1500 AXA Tower I
100 Madison Street
Syracuse, NY 13202
Re: U.S. Government Procurement;
Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979; Country of Origin of Titan
dimmer and fan speed switch
control; substantial transformation
Dear Mr. Berman:
This is in response to your letter,
dated March 5, 2010, requesting a final
determination on behalf of Pass &
Seymour Inc., pursuant to subpart B of
19 CFR Part 177.
Under these regulations, which
implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.) (‘‘TAA’’), CBP
issues country of origin advisory rulings
and final determinations as to whether
an article is or would be a product of a
designated country or instrumentality
for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in
U.S. law or practice for products offered
for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the
country of origin of certain dimmer and
fan speed control switches that Pass &
Seymour may sell to the U.S.
Government. We note that Pass &
Seymour is a party-at-interest within the
meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is
entitled to request this final
determination.
You also asked about the tariff
classification for the components and
the tariff classification and the country
of origin marking requirements for the
imported good. We have referred these
questions to the Tariff Classification and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
operations performed and whether the
parts lose their identity and become an
integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Facts:
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp.
Pass & Seymour (‘‘P & S’’) designs,
1149 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1983), aff’d, 741
manufactures and distributes dimmer
F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly
and fan speed control switches in the
operations that are minimal or simple,
U.S. for residential and commercial use
as opposed to complex or meaningful,
in electrical circuits of less than 1,000
will generally not result in a substantial
volts. This case involves two models:
transformation. See C.S.D. 80–111,
the Titan model dimmer and fan speed
C.S.D. 85–25, C.S.D. 89–110, C.S.D. 89–
switch control and the Harmony
118, C.S.D. 90–51, and C.S.D. 90–97. In
dimmer.
C.S.D. 85–25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985),
Legrand, the French parent company
CBP held that for purposes of the
of P & S, produces the subcomponents
Generalized System of Preferences
of the dimmers in Hong Kong. The
(‘‘GSP’’), the assembly of a large number
subcomponents are then shipped to
of fabricated components onto a printed
Mexico for assembly. The finished
circuit board in a process involving a
product is then imported into the U.S.
considerable amount of time and skill
The processing in Mexico includes
resulted in a substantial transformation.
the following: (1) The assembly of the
In that case, in excess of 50 discrete
bare printed circuit board into a final
fabricated components (such as
printed circuit board (‘‘PCB’’), and the
resistors, capacitors, diodes, integrated
assembly of the PCB with other
circuits, sockets, and connectors) were
components into the finished product.
assembled. Whether an operation is
The titan dimmer has a total of 34
components in addition to the PCB. The complex and meaningful depends on
the nature of the operation, including
harmony dimmer contains a PCB in
the number of components assembled,
addition to 28 other components.
number of different operations, time,
Issue:
skill level required, attention to detail,
What is the country of origin of the
quality control, the value added to the
imported dimmer and fan switches
article, and the overall employment
described above for the purpose of U.S.
generated by the manufacturing process.
government procurement?
In order to determine whether a
substantial transformation occurs when
Law and Analysis:
components of various origins are
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19
CFR § 177.21 et seq., which implements assembled into completed products,
CBP considers the totality of the
Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of
circumstances and makes such
1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 2511 et
determinations on a case-by-case basis.
seq.), CBP issues country of origin
The country of origin of the item’s
advisory rulings and final
components, extent of the processing
determinations as to whether an article
is or would be a product of a designated that occurs within a country, and
whether such processing renders a
country or instrumentality for the
product with a new name, character,
purposes of granting waivers of certain
‘‘Buy American’’ restrictions in U.S. law and use are primary considerations in
such cases. No one factor is
or practice for products offered for sale
determinative.
to the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth
CBP recently ruled in H047362, dated
under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
March 26, 2009, that a similar product
An article is a product of a country or
of P & S, electrical components, were
instrumentality only if (i) it is wholly
substantially transformed when Chinese
the growth, product, or manufacture of
parts were assembled in Mexico into the
that country or instrumentality, or (ii) in finished article. That case also involved
the case of an article which consists in
the production of the PCB and the
whole or in part of materials from
assembly of the PCB and 29 other parts
another country or instrumentality, it
in a process that took about 10 minutes
has been substantially transformed into
into the finished product. We find that
a new and different article of commerce this case is very similar to H047362. The
with a name, character, or use distinct
assembly in Mexico is sufficiently
from that of the article or articles from
complex and the components are
which it was so transformed. See also 19 substantially transformed into a final
CFR 177.22(a).
product that has a new name, character
and use. Therefore, the country of origin
In determining whether the
of the Titan dimmer and fan switch and
combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the harmony dimmer for government
procurement purposes is Mexico.
the determinative issue is the extent of
Marking Branch of this office for their
response directly to you.
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
Holding:
Based on the facts of this case, the
country of origin of the Titan dimmer
and fan switch and the Harmony
Dimmer is Mexico for purposes of U.S.
Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will
be given in the Federal Register, as
required by 19 CFR § 177.29. Any partyat-interest other than the party which
requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR § 177.31
that CBP reexamine the matter anew
and issue a new final determination.
Pursuant to 19 CFR § 177.30, any partyat-interest may, within 30 days after
publication of the Federal Register
Notice referenced above, seek judicial
review of this final determination before
the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
George F. McCray,
Acting Executive Director, Office of
Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010–15710 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5376–N–56]
Mortgage Insurance Termination;
Application for Premium Refund or
Distributive Share Payment
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection requirement described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act. The Department is
soliciting public comments on the
subject proposal.
Mortgage Insurance Termination is
used by servicing mortgagees to comply
with HUD requirements for reporting
termination of FHA mortgage insurance.
This information is used whenever FHA
mortgage insurance is terminated and
no claim for insurance benefits will be
filed. This information is submitted via
the Internet or EDI and is used to
directly pay eligible homeowners. This
condition occurs when the form passes
the criteria of certain system edits. As
the result the system generates a
disbursement to the eligible homeowner
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
for the refund consisting of the unused
portion of the paid premium. The
collection information required is used
to update HUD’s Single Family
Insurance System. The billing of
mortgage insurance premiums are
discontinued as a result of the
transaction. Without this information
the premium collection/monitoring
function would be severely impeded
and program data would be unreliable.
Under streamline III when the form is
processed but does not pass the series
of edits, the system generates in these
cases the Application for Premium
Refund or Distributive Share Payment to
the homeowner to be completed and
returned to HUD for further processing
for the refund. In general a Premium
Refund is the difference between the
amount of prepaid premium and the
amount of the premium that has been
earned by HUD up to the time the
mortgage is terminated.
DATES: Comments Due Date: July 29,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
approval Number (2502–0414) and
should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer,
Office of Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leroy McKinney, Jr., Reports
Management Officer, QDAM,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410; e-mail Leroy
McKinney, Jr. at
Leroy.McKinneyJr@hud.gov or telephone
(202) 402–5564. This is not a toll-free
number. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Mr. McKinney.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that the
Department of Housing and Urban
Development has submitted to OMB a
request for approval of the Information
collection described below. This notice
is soliciting comments from members of
the public and affecting agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information to: (1) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) Evaluate the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37455
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (3) Enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (4) Minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond; including
through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
This notice also lists the following
information:
Title of Proposal: Application for
Premium Refund or Distributive Share
Payment.
OMB Approval Number: 2502–0414.
Form Numbers: HUD–27050–A and
HUD–27050–B. HUD forms available at
https://HUD/program/offices/
administration/hudclips/forms.
Description of the Need for the
Information and its Proposed Use:
Mortgage Insurance Termination is used
by servicing mortgagees to comply with
HUD requirements for reporting
termination of FHA mortgage insurance.
This information is used whenever FHA
mortgage insurance is terminated and
no claim for insurance benefits will be
filed. This information is submitted via
the Internet or EDI and is used to
directly pay eligible homeowners. This
condition occurs when the form passes
the criteria of certain system edits. As a
result the system generates a
disbursement to the eligible homeowner
for the refund consisting of the unused
portion of the paid premium. The
collection information required is used
to update HUD’s Single Family
Insurance System. The billing of
mortgage insurance premiums are
discontinued as a result of the
transaction. Without this information
the premium collection/monitoring
function would be severely impeded
and program data would be unreliable.
Under streamline III when the form is
processed but does not pass the series
of edits, the system generates in these
cases the Application for Premium
Refund or Distributive Share Payment to
the homeowner to be completed and
returned to HUD for further processing
for the refund. In general a Premium
Refund is the difference between the
amount of prepaid premium and the
amount of the premium that has been
earned by HUD up to the time the
mortgage is terminated.
Frequency of Submission: On
occasion.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37453-37455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15710]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Notice of Issuance of Final Determination Concerning Dimmer and
Fan Speed Switch Controls
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice of final determination.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides notice that U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') has issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain dimmer and fan speed switch controls which
may be offered to the United States Government under a government
procurement contract. Based upon the facts presented, in the final
determination CBP concluded that Mexico is the country of origin of the
dimmer and fan speed switch controls for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
DATES: The final determination was issued on June 15, 2010. A copy of
the final determination is attached. Any party-at-interest, as defined
in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial review of this final
determination within July 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen S. Greene, Valuation and Special
Programs Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade
(202-325-0041).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that on June 15,
2010, pursuant to subpart B of part 177, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
part 177, subpart B), CBP issued a final determination concerning the
country of origin of certain dimmer and fan speed switch controls which
may be offered to the United States Government under a government
procurement contract. This final determination, in HQ H098417, was
issued at the request of Pass & Seymour, Inc. under procedures set
forth at 19 CFR part 177, subpart B, which implements Title III of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511-18). In the
final determination, CBP concluded that, based upon the facts
presented, certain articles will be substantially
[[Page 37454]]
transformed in Mexico. Therefore, CBP found that Mexico is the country
of origin of the finished articles for purposes of U.S. Government
procurement.
Section 177.29, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.29), provides that
notice of final determinations shall be published in the Federal
Register within 60 days of the date the final determination is issued.
Section 177.30, CBP Regulations (19 CFR 177.30), provides that any
party-at-interest, as defined in 19 CFR 177.22(d), may seek judicial
review of a final determination within 30 days of publication of such
determination in the Federal Register.
Dated: June 15, 2010.
George F. McCray,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office of
International Trade.
HQ H098417
June 15, 2010
OT:RR:CTF:VS H098417 KSG
Daniel B. Berman, Esq.
Hancock & Estabrook LLP
1500 AXA Tower I
100 Madison Street
Syracuse, NY 13202
Re: U.S. Government Procurement; Title III, Trade Agreements Act of
1979; Country of Origin of Titan dimmer and fan speed switch control;
substantial transformation
Dear Mr. Berman:
This is in response to your letter, dated March 5, 2010, requesting
a final determination on behalf of Pass & Seymour Inc., pursuant to
subpart B of 19 CFR Part 177.
Under these regulations, which implement Title III of the Trade
Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2511 et seq.) (``TAA''),
CBP issues country of origin advisory rulings and final determinations
as to whether an article is or would be a product of a designated
country or instrumentality for the purposes of granting waivers of
certain ``Buy American'' restrictions in U.S. law or practice for
products offered for sale to the U.S. Government.
This final determination concerns the country of origin of certain
dimmer and fan speed control switches that Pass & Seymour may sell to
the U.S. Government. We note that Pass & Seymour is a party-at-interest
within the meaning of 19 CFR 177.22(d)(1) and is entitled to request
this final determination.
You also asked about the tariff classification for the components
and the tariff classification and the country of origin marking
requirements for the imported good. We have referred these questions to
the Tariff Classification and Marking Branch of this office for their
response directly to you.
Facts:
Pass & Seymour (``P & S'') designs, manufactures and distributes
dimmer and fan speed control switches in the U.S. for residential and
commercial use in electrical circuits of less than 1,000 volts. This
case involves two models: the Titan model dimmer and fan speed switch
control and the Harmony dimmer.
Legrand, the French parent company of P & S, produces the
subcomponents of the dimmers in Hong Kong. The subcomponents are then
shipped to Mexico for assembly. The finished product is then imported
into the U.S.
The processing in Mexico includes the following: (1) The assembly
of the bare printed circuit board into a final printed circuit board
(``PCB''), and the assembly of the PCB with other components into the
finished product. The titan dimmer has a total of 34 components in
addition to the PCB. The harmony dimmer contains a PCB in addition to
28 other components.
Issue:
What is the country of origin of the imported dimmer and fan
switches described above for the purpose of U.S. government
procurement?
Law and Analysis:
Pursuant to Subpart B of Part 177, 19 CFR Sec. 177.21 et seq.,
which implements Title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. Sec. 2511 et seq.), CBP issues country of origin
advisory rulings and final determinations as to whether an article is
or would be a product of a designated country or instrumentality for
the purposes of granting waivers of certain ``Buy American''
restrictions in U.S. law or practice for products offered for sale to
the U.S. Government.
Under the rule of origin set forth under 19 U.S.C. 2518(4)(B):
An article is a product of a country or instrumentality only if (i) it
is wholly the growth, product, or manufacture of that country or
instrumentality, or (ii) in the case of an article which consists in
whole or in part of materials from another country or instrumentality,
it has been substantially transformed into a new and different article
of commerce with a name, character, or use distinct from that of the
article or articles from which it was so transformed. See also 19 CFR
177.22(a).
In determining whether the combining of parts or materials
constitutes a substantial transformation, the determinative issue is
the extent of operations performed and whether the parts lose their
identity and become an integral part of the new article. Belcrest
Linens v. United States, 573 F. Supp. 1149 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1983),
aff'd, 741 F.2d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1984). Assembly operations that are
minimal or simple, as opposed to complex or meaningful, will generally
not result in a substantial transformation. See C.S.D. 80-111, C.S.D.
85-25, C.S.D. 89-110, C.S.D. 89-118, C.S.D. 90-51, and C.S.D. 90-97. In
C.S.D. 85-25, 19 Cust. Bull. 844 (1985), CBP held that for purposes of
the Generalized System of Preferences (``GSP''), the assembly of a
large number of fabricated components onto a printed circuit board in a
process involving a considerable amount of time and skill resulted in a
substantial transformation. In that case, in excess of 50 discrete
fabricated components (such as resistors, capacitors, diodes,
integrated circuits, sockets, and connectors) were assembled. Whether
an operation is complex and meaningful depends on the nature of the
operation, including the number of components assembled, number of
different operations, time, skill level required, attention to detail,
quality control, the value added to the article, and the overall
employment generated by the manufacturing process.
In order to determine whether a substantial transformation occurs
when components of various origins are assembled into completed
products, CBP considers the totality of the circumstances and makes
such determinations on a case-by-case basis. The country of origin of
the item's components, extent of the processing that occurs within a
country, and whether such processing renders a product with a new name,
character, and use are primary considerations in such cases. No one
factor is determinative.
CBP recently ruled in H047362, dated March 26, 2009, that a similar
product of P & S, electrical components, were substantially transformed
when Chinese parts were assembled in Mexico into the finished article.
That case also involved the production of the PCB and the assembly of
the PCB and 29 other parts in a process that took about 10 minutes into
the finished product. We find that this case is very similar to
H047362. The assembly in Mexico is sufficiently complex and the
components are substantially transformed into a final product that has
a new name, character and use. Therefore, the country of origin of the
Titan dimmer and fan switch and the harmony dimmer for government
procurement purposes is Mexico.
[[Page 37455]]
Holding:
Based on the facts of this case, the country of origin of the Titan
dimmer and fan switch and the Harmony Dimmer is Mexico for purposes of
U.S. Government procurement.
Notice of this final determination will be given in the Federal
Register, as required by 19 CFR Sec. 177.29. Any party-at-interest
other than the party which requested this final determination may
request, pursuant to 19 CFR Sec. 177.31 that CBP reexamine the matter
anew and issue a new final determination. Pursuant to 19 CFR Sec.
177.30, any party-at-interest may, within 30 days after publication of
the Federal Register Notice referenced above, seek judicial review of
this final determination before the Court of International Trade.
Sincerely,
George F. McCray,
Acting Executive Director, Office of Regulations and Rulings, Office
of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2010-15710 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P