Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 37308-37309 [2010-15641]
Download as PDF
37308
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: June 11, 2010.
M.N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–15704 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0521]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Grand River, Grand Haven, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Commander, Ninth Coast
Guard District, issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
the operation of the U.S. 31 Bridge at
Mile 2.89 over the Grand River, at Grand
Haven, MI. This deviation temporarily
changes the bridges operating schedule
to accommodate the City’s Fourth of
July and Coast Guard Festival events for
2010. This temporary deviation allows
the bridges to remain secured to masted
navigation on the dates and times listed.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
10 p.m. on July 4, 2010 to 2 a.m. on July
5, 2010 and again from 10 p.m. on
August 7, 2010 to 2 a.m. on August 8,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in
this preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0521 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0521 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box
and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District; telephone 216–902–
6085, e-mail; lee.d.soule@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City
of Grand Haven, MI, requested a
temporary deviation from the current
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
operating regulations set forth in 33 CFR
117.633. The purpose of this request is
to facilitate efficient management of all
transportation needs and provide timely
public safety services during these
special events. The most updated and
detailed current marine information for
this event, and all bridge operations, is
found in the Local Notice to Mariners
and Broadcast Notice to Mariners issued
by the Ninth District Commander. In
accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the
drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time periods.
These deviations from the operating
regulations are authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: June 11, 2010.
M.N. Parks,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District.
F.M. Midgette,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2010–15705 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 20
Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco—
Prohibited in All Outbound and
Inbound International Mail; Correction
Postal ServiceTM.
Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service published
in the Federal Register of June 22, 2010,
a final rule pertaining to the
international mailing of inbound and
outbound tobacco cigarettes and
smokeless tobacco with an incorrect
effective date. This document corrects
that effective date.
DATES: Effective Date: The correct
effective date is June 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick
Klutts at 813–877–0372.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal
Service published a final rule in the
Federal Register on June 22, 2010 (75
FR 35302), adding a new section 136.4
to the International Mail Manual
(IMM®), which is incorporated by
reference in 39 CFR part 20, that
provides that cigarettes (including rollyour-own tobacco) and smokeless
tobacco products are nonmailable when
sent in outbound or inbound
international mail. That final rule
contained an erroneous effective date of
August 2, 2010. This document corrects
the effective date to June 29, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: June 23, 2010.
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010–15811 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0237; FRL–9167–6]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of
revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on April 16, 2010 and concern
volatile organic compound (VOC),
oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of
sulfur (SOx), particulate matter (PM),
and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions
from the permanent curtailment of
burning rice straw. We are approving a
local rule that regulates these emission
sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on July 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0237 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily
Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4114,
wong.lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
37309
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
I. Proposed Action
On April 16, 2010 (75 FR 19923), EPA
proposed to approve the following rule
into the California SIP.
Local agency
Rule No.
YSAQMD ....................
3.21
Rule title
Rice Straw Emission Reduction Credits ............................................
We proposed to approve this rule
because we determined that it complied
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the rule and our
evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we did not receive any
comments.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the
relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, EPA is fully approving this rule
into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
Adopted
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Submitted
12/10/08
03/17/09
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 30, 2010.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: June 14, 2010.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220, is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(363)(i)(C) to read
as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(363) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Yolo Solano Air Quality
Management District
(1) Rule 3.21, ‘‘Rice Straw Emission
Reduction Credits,’’ adopted on
December 10, 2008.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–15641 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\29JNR1.SGM
29JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37308-37309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15641]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0237; FRL-9167-6]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Yolo-
Solano Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District (YSAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal
Register on April 16, 2010 and concern volatile organic compound (VOC),
oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of sulfur (SOx), particulate matter
(PM), and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from the permanent curtailment
of burning rice straw. We are approving a local rule that regulates
these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on July 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0237 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114, wong.lily@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[[Page 37309]]
I. Proposed Action
On April 16, 2010 (75 FR 19923), EPA proposed to approve the
following rule into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YSAQMD................................ 3.21 Rice Straw Emission 12/10/08 03/17/09
Reduction Credits.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it
complied with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we did not receive any comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment that the
submitted rule complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving
this rule into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 30, 2010. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: June 14, 2010.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220, is amended by adding paragraph (c)(363)(i)(C) to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(363) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District
(1) Rule 3.21, ``Rice Straw Emission Reduction Credits,'' adopted
on December 10, 2008.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2010-15641 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P