Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products Related to ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares, 37406-37409 [2010-14818]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
37406
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
• Objective: A climate-literate public
that understands its vulnerabilities to a
changing climate and makes informed
decisions.
• Long-term goal: Weather-Ready
Nation - Society is prepared for and
responds to weather-related events.
• Objective: Reduced loss of life,
property, and disruption from highimpact events.
• Objective: Improved water resource
management.
• Objective: Improved transportation
efficiency and safety.
• Objective: Healthy people and
communities through improved air and
water quality.
• Objective: Secure, reliable
infrastructure for energy,
communications, and agriculture.
• Long-term goal: Healthy Oceans Vibrant marine fisheries, habitats, and
biodiversity sustained within healthy
and productive ecosystems.
• Objective: Improved understanding
of ecosystems to inform resource
management decisions.
• Objective: Recovered, rebuilt, and
sustained living marine resources.
• Objective: Healthy habitats that
sustain resilient and thriving marine
resources and communities.
• Objective: Safe and sustainable
seafood for healthy populations.
• Long-term goal: Resilient Coastal
Communities and Economies - Coastal
and Great Lakes communities that are
environmentally and economically
sustainable.
• Objective: Resilient coastal
communities that can adapt to the
impacts of hazards and climate change.
• Objective: Comprehensive ocean
and coastal planning and management.
• Objective: Safe, efficient and
environmentally sound marine
transportation.
• Objective: Improved coastal water
quality supporting human health and
coastal ecosystem services.
• Objective: Safe, environmentally
sound Arctic access and resource
management.
As a whole, NOAA’s capacity to
achieve these goals and objectives will
depend upon the continued
strengthening and integration of
NOAA’s enterprise-wide science and
technology, stronger partnerships and
stakeholder engagement, and effective
organizational and administrative
functions. Over the next five years,
NOAA will also direct its capabilities
toward objectives for society in each of
these components of its enterprise.
• NOAA’s Science & Technology
Enterprise:
• Objective: A holistic understanding
of the Earth system through research.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Objective: Accurate and reliable
data from sustained and integrated earth
observing systems.
• Objective: An integrated
environmental modeling system.
• NOAA’s Engagement Enterprise:
• Objective: An engaged and
educated public with an improved
capacity to make scientifically informed
environmental decisions.
• Objective: Integrated services
meeting the evolving demands of
regional stakeholders.
• Objective: Full and effective use of
international partnerships and policy
leadership to achieve NOAA’s mission
objectives.
• NOAA’s Organization &
Administration Enterprise:
• Objective: Diverse and constantly
evolving capabilities in NOAA’s
workforce.
• Objective: A modern information
technology infrastructure for a scientific
enterprise.
• Objective: Sound, life-cycle
management of capital investments.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Order Exempting the Trading and
Clearing of Certain Products Related to
ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and
ETFS Physical Silver Shares
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Final order.
SUMMARY: On April 15, 2010, the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (‘‘CFTC’’ or the
‘‘Commission’’) published for public
comment in the Federal Register 1 a
proposal to exempt the trading and
clearing of certain contracts called
‘‘options’’ and other contracts called
‘‘security futures’’ on each of ETFS
Physical Swiss Gold Shares (‘‘Gold
Products’’) and ETFS Physical Silver
Shares (‘‘Silver Products’’) (collectively,
‘‘Gold and Silver Products’’), which
would be traded on national securities
exchanges (as to options) and
designated contract markets registered
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’) as limited purpose
national securities exchanges (as to
security futures), and in either case
cleared through the Options Clearing
II. Request for Comments
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in its capacity as a
NOAA invites comments on its:
registered securities clearing agency,
from the provisions of the Commodity
mission statement; vision of the future;
Exchange Act (‘‘CEA’’) 2 and the
long-term strategic goals and five-year
regulations thereunder, to the extent
objectives; enterprise components and
necessary to permit them to be so traded
five-year objectives; and strategic
and cleared. Authority for this
partnerships. NOAA prefers that you
exemption is found in Section 4(c) of
submit comments online via the NGSP
3
website, www.noaa.gov/ngsp, where you the CEA. The Commission also
requested comment on whether it
may post general comments on the plan,
should amend all orders issued
comment on any particular section, as
exempting the trading and clearing of
well as vote on the comments posted by
options on gold and silver share-based
others. This method will help NOAA
products from CEA provisions and
understand which aspects of the plan
Commission regulations thereunder, to
deserve the most attention in
impose market and large trader
developing a final version. You may
reporting requirements under
also mail comments to: National
Commission regulations to the trading
Oceanic and Atmospheric
and clearing of the options in order to
Administration, Office of Program
assist the Commission in monitoring
Planning and Integration, 1315 East
and addressing, among other things, the
West Highway, Room 15749, Silver
effect on designated contract markets of
Spring, Maryland 20910 or email
trading in such products.4
comments to
DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2010
strategic.planning@noaa.gov.
Dated: June 24, 2010
Susan A. Kennedy,
Deputy Director of Strategic Planning, Office
of Program Planning and Integration,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–15768 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NW–S
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 75
FR 19619 (April 15, 2010).
U.S.C. 1 et seq.
3 7 U.S.C. 6(c).
4 The Commission has provided exemptions for
gold and silver products in three prior cases. See
Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of
Certain Products Related to SPDR® Gold Trust
Shares, 73 FR 31981 (June 5, 2008), Order
Exempting the Trading and Clearing of SPDR Gold
Futures Contracts, 73 FR 31979 (June 5, 2008), and
Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of
Certain Products Related to iShares® COMEX Gold
Trust Shares and iShares® Silver Trust Shares, 73
FR 79830 (December 30, 2008).
27
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert B. Wasserman, Associate
Director, 202–418–5092,
rwasserman@cftc.gov, or Lois J. Gregory,
Special Counsel, 202–418–5569,
lgregory@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing
and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
operations. The shares represent
entitlement to a specified quantity of
physical gold or silver bullion, or, in
certain circumstances, the proceeds
from the sale of such quantity of such
physical gold or silver bullion.
The gold and silver bullion is held in
vault by or on behalf of the custodian.
All physical gold and silver conforms to
the London Bullion Market
Association’s rules for good delivery.
I. Introduction
The OCC is both a Derivatives
Clearing Organization (‘‘DCO’’)
registered pursuant to Section 5b of the
CEA,5 and a securities clearing agency
registered pursuant to Section 17A of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘the ’34 Act’’).6
OCC has filed with the CFTC,
pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the CEA
and Commission Regulations 39.4(a)
and 40.5 thereunder,7 a request for
approval of rules and rule amendments
that would enable OCC (1) to clear and
settle contracts called ‘‘options’’
(‘‘Options’’) on Gold and Silver Products
traded on national securities exchanges,
in its capacity as a registered securities
clearing agency (and not in its capacity
as a DCO) and (2) to clear and settle
contracts called ‘‘security futures’’
(‘‘Security Futures’’) on Gold and Silver
Products traded on designated contract
markets 8 registered with the SEC as
limited purpose national securities
exchanges pursuant to Section 6(g) of
the ’34 Act 9 (‘‘DCMs’’) as security
futures subject to the CEA and CFTC
regulations thereunder governing
security futures, in OCC’s capacity as a
registered securities clearing agency
(and not in its capacity as a DCO).10
Section 5c(c)(3) provides that the CFTC
must approve such rules and rule
amendments submitted for approval
unless it finds that the rules or rule
amendments would violate the CEA.
In each case, the shares of the ETFS
Physical Swiss Gold Shares and the
ETFS Physical Silver Shares are
designed to reflect the performance of
the price of gold and silver bullion,
respectively, less the expenses of
II. Section 4(c) of the Commodity
Exchange Act
Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA empowers
the CFTC to ‘‘promote responsible
economic or financial innovation and
fair competition’’ by exempting any
transaction or class of transactions from
any of the provisions of the CEA
(subject to exceptions not relevant here)
where the Commission determines that
the exemption would be consistent with
the public interest.11 The Commission
may grant such an exemption by rule,
regulation or order, after notice and
opportunity for hearing, and may do so
on application of any person or on its
own initiative.
Section 4(c) does not require the
Commission determine the
jurisdictional status of the Options and
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products. In enacting Section 4(c),
Congress noted that the goal of the
provision ‘‘is to give the Commission a
means of providing certainty and
stability to existing and emerging
markets so that financial innovation and
market development can proceed in an
effective and competitive manner.’’ 12
Permitting Options and Security Futures
on Gold and Silver Products to trade on
57
U.S.C. 7a–1
U.S.C. 78q–l.
7 7 U.S.C. 7a–2(c), 17 C.F.R. §§ 39.4(a), 40.5.
8 See Section 5 of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(g).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61591
(February 25, 2010), 75 FR 9981 (March 4, 2010)
(File No. SR–OCC–2009–20 filed with both the
Commission and the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’)). See also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 61483 (February 3, 2010), 75 FR
6753 (February 10, 2010)(SEC approval of securities
exchanges’ listing and trading options on ETFS
Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical
Silver Shares).
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
6 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
11 Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(1),
provides in full that:
In order to promote responsible economic or
financial innovation and fair competition, the
Commission by rule, regulation, or order, after
notice and opportunity for hearing, may (on its own
initiative or on application of any person, including
any board of trade designated or registered as a
contract market or derivatives transaction execution
facility for transactions for future delivery in any
commodity under section 7 of this title) exempt any
agreement, contract, or transaction (or class thereof)
that is otherwise subject to subsection (a) of this
section (including any person or class of persons
offering, entering into, rendering advice or
rendering other services with respect to, the
agreement, contract, or transaction), either
unconditionally or on stated terms or conditions or
for stated periods and either retroactively or
prospectively, or both, from any of the requirements
of subsection (a) of this section, or from any other
provision of this chapter (except subparagraphs
(c)(ii) and (D) of section 2(a)(1) of this title, except
that the Commission and the Securities and
Exchange Commission may by rule, regulation, or
order jointly exclude any agreement, contract, or
transaction from section 2(a)(1)(D) of this title), if
the Commission determines that the exemption
would be consistent with the public interest.
12 HOUSE CONF. REPORT NO. 102–978, 1992
U.S.C.C.A.N. 3179, 3213 (‘‘4(c) Conf. Report’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37407
national securities exchanges (as to
Options) and DCMs (as to Security
Futures) and to be cleared by OCC in its
capacity as a securities clearing agency,
as discussed above, may foster both
financial innovation and competition.
The Options and Security Futures on
Gold and Silver Products described
above are novel instruments. Given,
among other things, the fact that the
Commission has previously exempted
similar Gold and Silver Products, the
Commission believes that this is an
appropriate case for issuing an
exemption without issuing a finding as
to the nature of these particular
instruments.
Section 4(c)(2) provides that the
Commission may grant exemptions only
when it determines: that the
requirements for which an exemption is
being provided should not be applied to
the agreements, contracts or transactions
at issue, and the exemption is consistent
with the public interest and the
purposes of the CEA; that the
agreements, contracts or transactions
will be entered into solely between
appropriate persons; and that the
exemption will not have a material
adverse effect on the ability of the
Commission or any contract market or
derivatives transaction execution
facility to discharge its regulatory or
self-regulatory responsibilities under the
CEA.13
In the April 15, 2010 Federal Register
release, the CFTC requested comment as
to whether this exemption from the
requirements of the CEA and regulations
thereunder should be granted in the
context of these transactions. The CFTC
also requested comment as to whether
national securities exchanges that list
Options on Gold and Silver Products
should comply with market reporting
requirements and brokers and traders
that carry accounts or trade in Options
on Gold and Silver products should
13 Section 4(c)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(2),
provides in full that:
The Commission shall not grant any exemption
under paragraph (1) from any of the requirements
of subsection (a) of this section unless the
Commission determines that—
(A) The requirement should not be applied to the
agreement, contract, or transaction for which the
exemption is sought and that the exemption would
be consistent with the public interest and the
purposes of this Act; and
(B) the agreement, contract, or transaction—
(i) will be entered into solely between appropriate
persons; and
(ii) will not have a material adverse effect on the
ability of the Commission or any contract market or
derivatives transaction execution facility to
discharge its regulatory or self-regulatory duties
under this Act.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
37408
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
comply with large trader reporting
requirements.14
Five comments were received: One
from OCC, two from national securities
exchanges,15 and two from private
citizens.16 Two of the comments (OCC
and CBOE) support the current
exemption, but urge the Commission to
deal with the status of commodity-based
ETFs on a categorical rather than a caseby-case basis. The Commission will
consider this suggestion.
OCC and CBOE also argue that any
large trader reporting requirements
imposed by the Commission would
result in unnecessary and duplicative
regulatory burdens, while ISE (which
also supports the proposed exemption)
notes that securities options exchanges
have large option position reporting
requirements in place, and that the
Commission should consider
coordinating these protections between
markets in order to address its concern
regarding the effective regulation of
interconnected markets. By contrast,
one public commenter (who opposes
granting the exemption) suggests that, if
the exemption is granted, it is crucial
that reporting requirements be imposed.
The Commission will consider these
comments in deciding what action to
take and or to propose with respect to
market and large trader reporting for the
trading and clearing of Options Gold
and Silver Products and similar options
on gold and silver products for which
exemptions have previously been
granted.17
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
III. Findings and Conclusions
After considering the complete record
in this matter, the Commission has
determined that the requirements of
Section 4(c) have been met. First, the
exemption is consistent with the public
interest and with the purposes of the
CEA, including ‘‘promot[ing]
responsible innovation and fair
competition among boards of trade,
other markets and market
participants.’’ 18 Particularly in light of
the exemptions previously granted by
the Commission with respect to Options
14 See Parts 15 through 21 of the Commission’s
regulations.
15 Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and
International Securities Exchange (ISE).
16 All five comments are available on the
Commission’s Web site, under comment file 10–04,
at https://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/
PublicComments/10-004.html.
17 See footnote 4, supra. The other public
commenter submitted an article suggesting that the
silver and gold futures markets were being
manipulated. There was no reference, however, to
Options on Gold or Silver Products.
18 CEA § 3(b), 7 U.S.C. § 5(b). See also CEA
§ 4(c)(1), 7 U.S.C. § 6(c)(1) (purpose of exemptions
is ‘‘to promote responsible economic or financial
innovation and fair competition.’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
and Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products, it appears consistent with
these and the other purposes of the
CEA, and with the public interest, for
the mode of trading and clearing these
Options and Security Futures—whether
the mode applicable to options on
securities or commodities, or to security
futures or futures—to be determined by
competitive market forces.
Second, Options and Security Futures
on Gold and Silver Products will be
entered into solely between appropriate
persons. Section 4(c)(3) includes within
the term ‘‘appropriate persons’’ a
number of specified categories of
persons, and also in subparagraph (K)
thereof ‘‘such other persons that the
Commission determines to be
appropriate in light of * * * the
applicability of appropriate regulatory
protections.’’ National securities
exchanges and OCC, as well as their
members who will intermediate Options
on Gold and Silver Products, are subject
to extensive and detailed regulation by
the SEC under the ‘34 Act. Similarly,
DCMs and OCC, as well as their
members who will intermediate
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products, are subject to regulation by
the SEC and CFTC. Given that the
Options and Security Futures on Gold
and Silver Products will be traded on
national securities exchanges (as to
Options) and DCMs (as to Security
Futures), the regulatory protections
available under securities laws and
regulations governing security futures,
and the goal of promoting fair
competition, the Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products
will be traded by appropriate persons.
Third, in light of the previous
exemptions granted for similar gold and
silver products, the grant of this
exemption would not have a material
adverse effect on the ability of the
Commission or any DCM to carry out
their regulatory responsibilities under
the CEA.
Therefore, upon due consideration,
pursuant to its authority under Section
4(c) of the CEA, the Commission hereby
issues this Order and exempts the
trading of Options on Gold and Silver
Products on national securities
exchanges and the trading of Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products on
DCMs registered with the SEC as limited
purpose national securities exchanges,
and the clearing of both the Options and
Security Futures through the Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) in its
capacity as a registered securities
clearing agency, from the provisions of
the CEA and the regulations thereunder,
to the extent necessary to permit the
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Options and Security Futures to be so
traded and cleared.
This Order is subject to termination or
revision, on a prospective basis, if the
Commission determines upon further
information that this exemption is not
consistent with the public interest. If the
Commission believes such exemption
becomes detrimental to the public
interest, the Commission may revoke
this Order on its own motion.
IV. Related Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) 19 imposes certain requirements
on federal agencies (including the
Commission) in connection with their
conducting or sponsoring any collection
of information as defined by the PRA.
The proposed exemptive order would
not, if approved, require a new
collection of information from any
entities that would be subject to the
proposed order.
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA,20 as
amended by Section 119 of the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act
of 2000, requires the Commission to
consider the costs and benefits of its
action before issuing an order under the
CEA. By its terms, Section 15(a) as
amended does not require the
Commission to quantify the costs and
benefits of an order or to determine
whether the benefits of the order
outweigh its costs. Rather, Section 15(a)
simply requires the Commission to
‘‘consider the costs and benefits’’ of its
action.
Section 15(a) of the CEA further
specifies that costs and benefits shall be
evaluated in light of five broad areas of
market and public concern: protection
of market participants and the public;
efficiency, competitiveness, and
financial integrity of futures markets;
price discovery; sound risk management
practices; and other public interest
considerations. Accordingly, the
Commission could in its discretion give
greater weight to any one of the five
enumerated areas and could in its
discretion determine that,
notwithstanding its costs, a particular
order was necessary or appropriate to
protect the public interest or to
effectuate any of the provisions or to
accomplish any of the purposes of the
CEA.
The Commission has considered the
costs and benefits of the order in light
19 44
20 7
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
U.S.C. 3507(d).
U.S.C. 19(a).
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Notices
of the specific provisions of Section
15(a) of the CEA, as follows: 21
1. Protection of market participants
and the public. National securities
exchanges, OCC, and their members
who would intermediate the abovedescribed Options and Security Futures
on Gold and Silver Products are subject
to extensive regulatory oversight.
2. Efficiency, competition, and
financial integrity. The exemptive order
may enhance market efficiency and
competition since it could encourage
potential trading of Options and
Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products through modes other than
those normally applicable; that is,
designated contract markets or
derivatives transaction execution
facilities. Financial integrity will not be
affected since the Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products
will be cleared by OCC, a DCO and SECregistered clearing agency,
intermediated by SEC-registered brokerdealers.
3. Price discovery. Price discovery
may be enhanced through market
competition.
4. Sound risk management practices.
The Options and Security Futures on
Gold and Silver Products will be subject
to OCC’s current risk-management
practices including its margining
system. In addition, OCC is supervised
by both the SEC and the Commission,
and the Commission has found OCC’s
risk management practices, including its
margining system, generally sound.22
5. Other public interest
considerations. The exemptive order
appears likely to encourage
development of derivative products
through market competition without
unnecessary regulatory burden.
The Commission requested comment
on its application of these factors in the
proposing release. As noted above, one
comment was received.
After considering these factors, the
Commission has determined to issue
this order.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14,
2010 by the Commission.
Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010–14818 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES4
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
21 See also Previous Orders, 73 FR at 31982 (June
5, 2008), 73 FR at 3 FR at 31980 (June 5, 2008), and
73 FR at 79832 (December 30, 2008).
22 One commenter questioned whether the
Commission’s conclusions regarding sound risk
management practices at OCC were unduly reliant
on supervision by others. In fact, the Commission
itself conducts supervision of OCC and its risk
management practices.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:55 Jun 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
37409
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses.
Information Collection; Submission for
OMB Review, Comment Request
Comments
AGENCY: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National
and Community Service (hereinafter the
‘‘Corporation’’), has submitted a public
information collection request (ICR),
titled the Application for the President’s
Higher Education Community Service
Honor Roll, to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13, (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35). Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling the Corporation,
Kevin Michael Days, at (202) 606–6899.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TTY–TDD) may call (202) 606–3472
between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern
time, Monday through Friday.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted, identified by the title of the
information collection activity, to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attn: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB
Desk Officer for the Corporation for
National and Community Service, by
any of the following two methods
within 30 days from the date of
publication in this Federal Register:
(1) By fax to: (202) 395–6974,
Attention: Ms. Sharon Mar, OMB Desk
Officer for the Corporation for National
and Community Service; and
(2) Electronically by e-mail to:
smar@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Corporation, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
A 60-day public comment Notice was
published in the Federal Register on
March 30, 2010. This comment period
ended June 1, 2010. No public
comments were received from this
Notice.
Description: The Corporation is
seeking approval of the Application for
the President’s Higher Education
Community Service Honor Roll. The
President’s Higher Education
Community Service Honor Roll program
is designed to identify and reward
exemplary higher education community
service programs and practices. This
program helps fulfill the Corporation’s
strategic goals of engaging Americans,
particularly millions of college students,
in service, and ensuring that all higher
education institutions provide, or
stimulate the creation of resources to
coordinate service, service-learning, and
community partnerships. During this
fifth year of the Honor Roll program, the
application will include a special focus
area that will highlight the national
service priorities of the Administration
and the Edward M. Kennedy Serve
America Act, by encouraging higher
education institutions’ efforts to tackle
priorities ranging from increasing high
school graduation rates to fostering
economic opportunity.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Application for the President’s
Higher Education Community Service
Honor Roll.
OMB Number: 3045- 0120.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Degree-granting
colleges and universities located in the
U.S. and its territories.
Total Respondents: 4,500.
Frequency: Annual.
Average Time per Response: Averages
1 hour.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 4,500
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Dated: June 23, 2010.
Elson Nash,
Associate Director, Learn and Serve America.
[FR Doc. 2010–15693 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37406-37409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14818]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products
Related to ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver
Shares
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On April 15, 2010, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(``CFTC'' or the ``Commission'') published for public comment in the
Federal Register \1\ a proposal to exempt the trading and clearing of
certain contracts called ``options'' and other contracts called
``security futures'' on each of ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares (``Gold
Products'') and ETFS Physical Silver Shares (``Silver Products'')
(collectively, ``Gold and Silver Products''), which would be traded on
national securities exchanges (as to options) and designated contract
markets registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'') as limited purpose national securities exchanges (as to
security futures), and in either case cleared through the Options
Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in its capacity as a registered
securities clearing agency, from the provisions of the Commodity
Exchange Act (``CEA'') \2\ and the regulations thereunder, to the
extent necessary to permit them to be so traded and cleared. Authority
for this exemption is found in Section 4(c) of the CEA.\3\ The
Commission also requested comment on whether it should amend all orders
issued exempting the trading and clearing of options on gold and silver
share-based products from CEA provisions and Commission regulations
thereunder, to impose market and large trader reporting requirements
under Commission regulations to the trading and clearing of the options
in order to assist the Commission in monitoring and addressing, among
other things, the effect on designated contract markets of trading in
such products.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 75 FR 19619 (April 15, 2010).
\2\ 7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
\3\ 7 U.S.C. 6(c).
\4\ The Commission has provided exemptions for gold and silver
products in three prior cases. See Order Exempting the Trading and
Clearing of Certain Products Related to SPDR[supreg] Gold Trust
Shares, 73 FR 31981 (June 5, 2008), Order Exempting the Trading and
Clearing of SPDR Gold Futures Contracts, 73 FR 31979 (June 5, 2008),
and Order Exempting the Trading and Clearing of Certain Products
Related to iShares[supreg] COMEX Gold Trust Shares and
iShares[supreg] Silver Trust Shares, 73 FR 79830 (December 30,
2008).
DATES: Effective Date: June 14, 2010
[[Page 37407]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert B. Wasserman, Associate
Director, 202-418-5092, rwasserman@cftc.gov, or Lois J. Gregory,
Special Counsel, 202-418-5569, lgregory@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing
and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three
Lafayette Centre, 1151 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The OCC is both a Derivatives Clearing Organization (``DCO'')
registered pursuant to Section 5b of the CEA,\5\ and a securities
clearing agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``the '34 Act'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 7 U.S.C. 7a-1
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-l.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC has filed with the CFTC, pursuant to Section 5c(c) of the CEA
and Commission Regulations 39.4(a) and 40.5 thereunder,\7\ a request
for approval of rules and rule amendments that would enable OCC (1) to
clear and settle contracts called ``options'' (``Options'') on Gold and
Silver Products traded on national securities exchanges, in its
capacity as a registered securities clearing agency (and not in its
capacity as a DCO) and (2) to clear and settle contracts called
``security futures'' (``Security Futures'') on Gold and Silver Products
traded on designated contract markets \8\ registered with the SEC as
limited purpose national securities exchanges pursuant to Section 6(g)
of the '34 Act \9\ (``DCMs'') as security futures subject to the CEA
and CFTC regulations thereunder governing security futures, in OCC's
capacity as a registered securities clearing agency (and not in its
capacity as a DCO).\10\ Section 5c(c)(3) provides that the CFTC must
approve such rules and rule amendments submitted for approval unless it
finds that the rules or rule amendments would violate the CEA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 7 U.S.C. 7a-2(c), 17 C.F.R. Sec. Sec. 39.4(a), 40.5.
\8\ See Section 5 of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 7.
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(g).
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61591 (February 25,
2010), 75 FR 9981 (March 4, 2010) (File No. SR-OCC-2009-20 filed
with both the Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'')). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61483
(February 3, 2010), 75 FR 6753 (February 10, 2010)(SEC approval of
securities exchanges' listing and trading options on ETFS Physical
Swiss Gold Shares and ETFS Physical Silver Shares).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In each case, the shares of the ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares and
the ETFS Physical Silver Shares are designed to reflect the performance
of the price of gold and silver bullion, respectively, less the
expenses of operations. The shares represent entitlement to a specified
quantity of physical gold or silver bullion, or, in certain
circumstances, the proceeds from the sale of such quantity of such
physical gold or silver bullion.
The gold and silver bullion is held in vault by or on behalf of the
custodian. All physical gold and silver conforms to the London Bullion
Market Association's rules for good delivery.
II. Section 4(c) of the Commodity Exchange Act
Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA empowers the CFTC to ``promote
responsible economic or financial innovation and fair competition'' by
exempting any transaction or class of transactions from any of the
provisions of the CEA (subject to exceptions not relevant here) where
the Commission determines that the exemption would be consistent with
the public interest.\11\ The Commission may grant such an exemption by
rule, regulation or order, after notice and opportunity for hearing,
and may do so on application of any person or on its own initiative.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Section 4(c)(1) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(1), provides in
full that:
In order to promote responsible economic or financial innovation
and fair competition, the Commission by rule, regulation, or order,
after notice and opportunity for hearing, may (on its own initiative
or on application of any person, including any board of trade
designated or registered as a contract market or derivatives
transaction execution facility for transactions for future delivery
in any commodity under section 7 of this title) exempt any
agreement, contract, or transaction (or class thereof) that is
otherwise subject to subsection (a) of this section (including any
person or class of persons offering, entering into, rendering advice
or rendering other services with respect to, the agreement,
contract, or transaction), either unconditionally or on stated terms
or conditions or for stated periods and either retroactively or
prospectively, or both, from any of the requirements of subsection
(a) of this section, or from any other provision of this chapter
(except subparagraphs (c)(ii) and (D) of section 2(a)(1) of this
title, except that the Commission and the Securities and Exchange
Commission may by rule, regulation, or order jointly exclude any
agreement, contract, or transaction from section 2(a)(1)(D) of this
title), if the Commission determines that the exemption would be
consistent with the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4(c) does not require the Commission determine the
jurisdictional status of the Options and Security Futures on Gold and
Silver Products. In enacting Section 4(c), Congress noted that the goal
of the provision ``is to give the Commission a means of providing
certainty and stability to existing and emerging markets so that
financial innovation and market development can proceed in an effective
and competitive manner.'' \12\ Permitting Options and Security Futures
on Gold and Silver Products to trade on national securities exchanges
(as to Options) and DCMs (as to Security Futures) and to be cleared by
OCC in its capacity as a securities clearing agency, as discussed
above, may foster both financial innovation and competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ HOUSE CONF. REPORT NO. 102-978, 1992 U.S.C.C.A.N. 3179,
3213 (``4(c) Conf. Report'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products
described above are novel instruments. Given, among other things, the
fact that the Commission has previously exempted similar Gold and
Silver Products, the Commission believes that this is an appropriate
case for issuing an exemption without issuing a finding as to the
nature of these particular instruments.
Section 4(c)(2) provides that the Commission may grant exemptions
only when it determines: that the requirements for which an exemption
is being provided should not be applied to the agreements, contracts or
transactions at issue, and the exemption is consistent with the public
interest and the purposes of the CEA; that the agreements, contracts or
transactions will be entered into solely between appropriate persons;
and that the exemption will not have a material adverse effect on the
ability of the Commission or any contract market or derivatives
transaction execution facility to discharge its regulatory or self-
regulatory responsibilities under the CEA.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Section 4(c)(2) of the CEA, 7 U.S.C. 6(c)(2), provides in
full that:
The Commission shall not grant any exemption under paragraph (1)
from any of the requirements of subsection (a) of this section
unless the Commission determines that--
(A) The requirement should not be applied to the agreement,
contract, or transaction for which the exemption is sought and that
the exemption would be consistent with the public interest and the
purposes of this Act; and
(B) the agreement, contract, or transaction--
(i) will be entered into solely between appropriate persons; and
(ii) will not have a material adverse effect on the ability of
the Commission or any contract market or derivatives transaction
execution facility to discharge its regulatory or self-regulatory
duties under this Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the April 15, 2010 Federal Register release, the CFTC requested
comment as to whether this exemption from the requirements of the CEA
and regulations thereunder should be granted in the context of these
transactions. The CFTC also requested comment as to whether national
securities exchanges that list Options on Gold and Silver Products
should comply with market reporting requirements and brokers and
traders that carry accounts or trade in Options on Gold and Silver
products should
[[Page 37408]]
comply with large trader reporting requirements.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Parts 15 through 21 of the Commission's regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Five comments were received: One from OCC, two from national
securities exchanges,\15\ and two from private citizens.\16\ Two of the
comments (OCC and CBOE) support the current exemption, but urge the
Commission to deal with the status of commodity-based ETFs on a
categorical rather than a case-by-case basis. The Commission will
consider this suggestion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE) and International
Securities Exchange (ISE).
\16\ All five comments are available on the Commission's Web
site, under comment file 10-04, at https://www.cftc.gov/LawRegulation/PublicComments/10-004.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC and CBOE also argue that any large trader reporting
requirements imposed by the Commission would result in unnecessary and
duplicative regulatory burdens, while ISE (which also supports the
proposed exemption) notes that securities options exchanges have large
option position reporting requirements in place, and that the
Commission should consider coordinating these protections between
markets in order to address its concern regarding the effective
regulation of interconnected markets. By contrast, one public commenter
(who opposes granting the exemption) suggests that, if the exemption is
granted, it is crucial that reporting requirements be imposed. The
Commission will consider these comments in deciding what action to take
and or to propose with respect to market and large trader reporting for
the trading and clearing of Options Gold and Silver Products and
similar options on gold and silver products for which exemptions have
previously been granted.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See footnote 4, supra. The other public commenter submitted
an article suggesting that the silver and gold futures markets were
being manipulated. There was no reference, however, to Options on
Gold or Silver Products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Findings and Conclusions
After considering the complete record in this matter, the
Commission has determined that the requirements of Section 4(c) have
been met. First, the exemption is consistent with the public interest
and with the purposes of the CEA, including ``promot[ing] responsible
innovation and fair competition among boards of trade, other markets
and market participants.'' \18\ Particularly in light of the exemptions
previously granted by the Commission with respect to Options and
Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products, it appears consistent
with these and the other purposes of the CEA, and with the public
interest, for the mode of trading and clearing these Options and
Security Futures--whether the mode applicable to options on securities
or commodities, or to security futures or futures--to be determined by
competitive market forces.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ CEA Sec. 3(b), 7 U.S.C. Sec. 5(b). See also CEA Sec.
4(c)(1), 7 U.S.C. Sec. 6(c)(1) (purpose of exemptions is ``to
promote responsible economic or financial innovation and fair
competition.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products
will be entered into solely between appropriate persons. Section
4(c)(3) includes within the term ``appropriate persons'' a number of
specified categories of persons, and also in subparagraph (K) thereof
``such other persons that the Commission determines to be appropriate
in light of * * * the applicability of appropriate regulatory
protections.'' National securities exchanges and OCC, as well as their
members who will intermediate Options on Gold and Silver Products, are
subject to extensive and detailed regulation by the SEC under the `34
Act. Similarly, DCMs and OCC, as well as their members who will
intermediate Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products, are subject
to regulation by the SEC and CFTC. Given that the Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products will be traded on national
securities exchanges (as to Options) and DCMs (as to Security Futures),
the regulatory protections available under securities laws and
regulations governing security futures, and the goal of promoting fair
competition, the Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products will be traded by appropriate persons.
Third, in light of the previous exemptions granted for similar gold
and silver products, the grant of this exemption would not have a
material adverse effect on the ability of the Commission or any DCM to
carry out their regulatory responsibilities under the CEA.
Therefore, upon due consideration, pursuant to its authority under
Section 4(c) of the CEA, the Commission hereby issues this Order and
exempts the trading of Options on Gold and Silver Products on national
securities exchanges and the trading of Security Futures on Gold and
Silver Products on DCMs registered with the SEC as limited purpose
national securities exchanges, and the clearing of both the Options and
Security Futures through the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') in
its capacity as a registered securities clearing agency, from the
provisions of the CEA and the regulations thereunder, to the extent
necessary to permit the Options and Security Futures to be so traded
and cleared.
This Order is subject to termination or revision, on a prospective
basis, if the Commission determines upon further information that this
exemption is not consistent with the public interest. If the Commission
believes such exemption becomes detrimental to the public interest, the
Commission may revoke this Order on its own motion.
IV. Related Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (``PRA'') \19\ imposes certain
requirements on federal agencies (including the Commission) in
connection with their conducting or sponsoring any collection of
information as defined by the PRA. The proposed exemptive order would
not, if approved, require a new collection of information from any
entities that would be subject to the proposed order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 44 U.S.C. 3507(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Cost-Benefit Analysis
Section 15(a) of the CEA,\20\ as amended by Section 119 of the
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, requires the Commission to
consider the costs and benefits of its action before issuing an order
under the CEA. By its terms, Section 15(a) as amended does not require
the Commission to quantify the costs and benefits of an order or to
determine whether the benefits of the order outweigh its costs. Rather,
Section 15(a) simply requires the Commission to ``consider the costs
and benefits'' of its action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 7 U.S.C. 19(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 15(a) of the CEA further specifies that costs and benefits
shall be evaluated in light of five broad areas of market and public
concern: protection of market participants and the public; efficiency,
competitiveness, and financial integrity of futures markets; price
discovery; sound risk management practices; and other public interest
considerations. Accordingly, the Commission could in its discretion
give greater weight to any one of the five enumerated areas and could
in its discretion determine that, notwithstanding its costs, a
particular order was necessary or appropriate to protect the public
interest or to effectuate any of the provisions or to accomplish any of
the purposes of the CEA.
The Commission has considered the costs and benefits of the order
in light
[[Page 37409]]
of the specific provisions of Section 15(a) of the CEA, as follows:
\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See also Previous Orders, 73 FR at 31982 (June 5, 2008), 73
FR at 3 FR at 31980 (June 5, 2008), and 73 FR at 79832 (December 30,
2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Protection of market participants and the public. National
securities exchanges, OCC, and their members who would intermediate the
above-described Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver
Products are subject to extensive regulatory oversight.
2. Efficiency, competition, and financial integrity. The exemptive
order may enhance market efficiency and competition since it could
encourage potential trading of Options and Security Futures on Gold and
Silver Products through modes other than those normally applicable;
that is, designated contract markets or derivatives transaction
execution facilities. Financial integrity will not be affected since
the Options and Security Futures on Gold and Silver Products will be
cleared by OCC, a DCO and SEC-registered clearing agency, intermediated
by SEC-registered broker-dealers.
3. Price discovery. Price discovery may be enhanced through market
competition.
4. Sound risk management practices. The Options and Security
Futures on Gold and Silver Products will be subject to OCC's current
risk-management practices including its margining system. In addition,
OCC is supervised by both the SEC and the Commission, and the
Commission has found OCC's risk management practices, including its
margining system, generally sound.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ One commenter questioned whether the Commission's
conclusions regarding sound risk management practices at OCC were
unduly reliant on supervision by others. In fact, the Commission
itself conducts supervision of OCC and its risk management
practices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Other public interest considerations. The exemptive order
appears likely to encourage development of derivative products through
market competition without unnecessary regulatory burden.
The Commission requested comment on its application of these
factors in the proposing release. As noted above, one comment was
received.
After considering these factors, the Commission has determined to
issue this order.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14, 2010 by the Commission.
Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-14818 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P