Proposed Settlement Agreement, 36654-36656 [2010-15645]

Download as PDF 36654 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices decrease in the projected number of release notifications per year. What is the next step in the process for this ICR? EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Dated: May 27, 2010. Maryann B. Petrole, Acting Director, Office of Emergency Management. [FR Doc. 2010–15644 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL–9168–6] Final Notice of Data Availability Concerning 2010 CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program New Unit SetAside Allowance Allocations Under the Clean Air Interstate Rule Federal Implementation Plan jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of data availability (NODA). SUMMARY: EPA is administering—under the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) Federal Implementation Plans (FIPs)— the CAIR NOX Ozone Season Trading Program (CAIROS) new unit set-aside allowance pools for Delaware and the District of Columbia. The CAIROS FIPs require the Administrator to determine each year by order the allowance allocations from the new unit set-aside for units in these jurisdictions whose owners and operators requested these allocations and to provide the public with the opportunity to object to the allocation determinations. On April 27, 2010, EPA issued a NODA setting forth such determinations in the Federal Register and provided an opportunity for submission of objections. Through the NODA issued today, EPA is making available to the public the Agency’s determinations, after considering all objections, of CAIROS allowance allocations and denials of such VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:02 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 allocations under the FIPs, as well as the data upon which the allocations and denials of allocations were based. DATES: Under § 97.353(e), EPA must record, by September 1, 2010, the CAIROS new unit set-aside allowance allocations, consistent with this NODA, in the compliance accounts of units whose owners and operators successfully applied for a CAIROS new unit set-aside allowance allocation under the CAIR FIPs. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action should be addressed to Robert L. Miller, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CAMD (6204J), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 343–9077, and e-mail miller.robertl@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For more background and information regarding the purpose of the NODA, requirements for requesting and receiving CAIROS new unit set-aside allowances under the CAIR FIPs, procedures for allocating such allowances, the application by EPA of requirements to individual CAIROS new unit set-aside allocation requests, and the interpretation the data upon which the CAIROS new unit set-aside allocations and denial of allocations were based, see the April 27, 2010 NODA (75 FR 22172, April 27, 2010). EPA received no objections to the determinations and data in the April 27, 2010 NODA. Therefore, EPA adopts the CAIROS new unit set-aside allocations set forth in the April 27, 2010 NODA. EPA is not requesting objections to the data provided in this final NODA. This action constitutes a final action for determining the CAIROS new unit setaside allowance allocations under § 97.342 and the CAIR FIPs. concerning a petition from Pesticide Poisoning Victims United that asks the Agency to undertake a number of actions to protect potentially affected individuals in Lane County, OR from pesticides applied to surrounding forestlands. This document extends the comment period for 45 days, from June 28, 2010, to August 12, 2010. DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ– OPP–2010–0265, must be received on or before August 12, 2010. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the Federal Register document of April 28, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Bloom, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8019; e-mail address: bloom.jill@epa.gov. Dated: June 18, 2010. Brian McLean, Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs. Dated: June 23, 2010. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. [FR Doc. 2010–15646 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P This document extends the public comment period established in the Federal Register of April 28, 2010 (75 FR 22401) (FRL–8822–8). EPA is hereby extending the comment period, which was set to end on June 28, 2010, to August 12, 2010. To submit comments, or access the docket, please follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the April 28, 2010 Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: List of Subjects Environmental protection, Pesticides, and Pests. [FR Doc. 2010–15719 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–HQ–OPP–2010–0265; FRL–8833–3] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Petition from Pesticide Poisoning Victims United; Notice of Availability; Extension of Comment Period [FRL–9168–9] AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period. AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement; request for public comment. SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of April 28, 2010, SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Proposed Settlement Agreement E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement to address lawsuits filed by Navistar, Inc. (Navistar) in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: Navistar v. EPA, Nos. 09–1113, 09–1114 and 09–1317 (DC Cir.). Navistar filed petitions for review of the following: (1) An EPA rule published January 18, 2001 promulgating standards for new heavy duty motor vehicles and engines; (2) a letter, dated February 18, 2009, sent by the Director of the Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, providing guidance to manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel engines; and (3) an agency notice, published November 9, 2009, approving new scheduled maintenance for new motor vehicles and engines using selective catalytic technologies. Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, Navistar agrees to dismiss these petitions with prejudice, to withdraw related Freedom if Information Act requests, and to be precluded from challenging certain other related actions. EPA agrees to engage in a public process within a specific time frame to reexamine its policies, for future model year 2011 and later heavy duty diesel engines, for operation of SCR-equipped engines without DEF, with improper DEF, or when tampering (or some other defect in the SCR system) is detected. The public process shall take the form of a workshop, hearing, or other public process. DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be received by July 28, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA– HQ–OGC–2010–0507, online at https:// www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred method); by e-mail to oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD– ROM should be formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address above. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Horowitz, Air and Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:02 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 564–5583; fax number (202) 564–5603; e-mail address: horowitz.michael@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement This proposed settlement agreement would potentially resolve petitions for judicial review filed by Navistar for review of the following: (1) An EPA rule published January 18, 2001 promulgating standards for new heavy duty motor vehicles and engines; (2) a letter, dated February 18, 2009, sent by the Director of the Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, providing guidance to manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel engines; and (3) an agency notice, published November 9, 2009, approving new scheduled maintenance for new motor vehicles and engines using selective catalytic technologies. Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, Navistar agrees to dismiss these petitions with prejudice and to withdraw related Freedom of Information Act requests. Navistar also agrees that it would be precluded from filing any of the following petitions for review: (1) Petitions challenging directly or indirectly individual certificates of conformity issued for a model year prior to the 2012 model year (excluding action exercising its rights regarding certifications of its own engines in any model year); and (2) petitions challenging a letter dated December 30, 2009 from the Director of the Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, providing revised guidance for certification of heavy-duty diesel engines using SCR technologies (‘‘December 2009 Guidance’’). However, Navistar reserves its right to exercise its rights regarding any changes or modifications to that guidance issued after the public process selected by EPA and retains all other rights and remedies to challenge EPA’s final action that occurs following the public process selected by EPA. Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, EPA agrees to engage in a public process to reexamine its policies, for future model year 2011 and later heavy duty diesel engines, for operation of SCR-equipped engines without DEF, with improper DEF, or when tampering (or some other defect in the SCR system) is detected. The public process will take the form of a workshop, hearing, or other public PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36655 process. EPA will issue a public notice of the public process to be published in the Federal Register not later than June 30, 2010 or twenty-eight days after the date this Agreement becomes final, whichever is later. EPA will include in the public notice statements that: (a) The public process is designed to provide a thorough review of EPA’s policies regarding operation of SCRequipped heavy duty diesel engines without DEF, with improper DEF, or when tampering (or some other defect in the SCR system) is detected for future 2011 and later model year engines, in order to ensure, among other things, that SCR-equipped engines are designed to properly control emissions as required under applicable regulations; (b) it is appropriate for EPA to review and reexamine its policies as technologies are introduced into the marketplace; (c) EPA intends to review any information that has become available to determine whether its policies regarding SCRequipped engines should be revised; and (d) the scope of the review includes the December 2009 Guidance. EPA will conduct the selected public process not later than sixty days after the publication of the public notice in the Federal Register. For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of Justice determines, based on any comment submitted, that consent to this settlement agreement should be withdrawn, the terms of the agreement will be affirmed. II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement Agreement A. How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement? The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC–2010–0507) contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1 36656 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566– 1752. An electronic version of the public docket is available through https:// www.regulations.gov. You may use the https://www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the appropriate docket identification number. It is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing online at https:// www.regulations.gov without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not included in the official public docket or in the electronic public docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted material, including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket Center. B. How and to whom do i submit comments? You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Use of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA electronically is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. The electronic public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. In contrast to EPA’s electronic public docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail) system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address is automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made available in EPA’s electronic public docket. Dated: June 21, 2010. Richard B. Ossias, Associate General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2010–15645 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, Liquidator, or Manager AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ‘‘of record’’ notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at https:// www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/ banklist.html or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: June 21, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist. INSTITUTIONS IN LIQUIDATION [In alphabetical order] FDIC Ref. No. Bank name City 10250 ...................................................................... Nevada Security Bank ............................................ Reno ............ [FR Doc. 2010–15500 Filed 6–25–10; 8:45 am] jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE P FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Sunshine Act Notices AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. VerDate Mar<15>2010 21:02 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, June 29, 2010, at 10 a.m. PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public. ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 State Date closed NV 06/18/2010 Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee. E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM 28JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 123 (Monday, June 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36654-36656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9168-9]


Proposed Settlement Agreement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement; request for public 
comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended

[[Page 36655]]

(``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
settlement agreement to address lawsuits filed by Navistar, Inc. 
(Navistar) in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit: Navistar v. EPA, Nos. 09-1113, 09-1114 and 09-1317 
(DC Cir.). Navistar filed petitions for review of the following: (1) An 
EPA rule published January 18, 2001 promulgating standards for new 
heavy duty motor vehicles and engines; (2) a letter, dated February 18, 
2009, sent by the Director of the Compliance and Innovative Strategies 
Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, providing guidance 
to manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel engines; and (3) an agency 
notice, published November 9, 2009, approving new scheduled maintenance 
for new motor vehicles and engines using selective catalytic 
technologies. Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, 
Navistar agrees to dismiss these petitions with prejudice, to withdraw 
related Freedom if Information Act requests, and to be precluded from 
challenging certain other related actions. EPA agrees to engage in a 
public process within a specific time frame to reexamine its policies, 
for future model year 2011 and later heavy duty diesel engines, for 
operation of SCR-equipped engines without DEF, with improper DEF, or 
when tampering (or some other defect in the SCR system) is detected. 
The public process shall take the form of a workshop, hearing, or other 
public process.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be 
received by July 28, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2010-0507, online at https://www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred 
method); by e-mail to oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, 
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; or by hand delivery or courier to 
EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, 
excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD-ROM should be 
formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters 
and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address 
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Horowitz, Air and Radiation 
Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; 
telephone: (202) 564-5583; fax number (202) 564-5603; e-mail address: 
horowitz.michael@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement

    This proposed settlement agreement would potentially resolve 
petitions for judicial review filed by Navistar for review of the 
following: (1) An EPA rule published January 18, 2001 promulgating 
standards for new heavy duty motor vehicles and engines; (2) a letter, 
dated February 18, 2009, sent by the Director of the Compliance and 
Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air 
Quality, providing guidance to manufacturers of heavy-duty diesel 
engines; and (3) an agency notice, published November 9, 2009, 
approving new scheduled maintenance for new motor vehicles and engines 
using selective catalytic technologies. Under the terms of the proposed 
settlement agreement, Navistar agrees to dismiss these petitions with 
prejudice and to withdraw related Freedom of Information Act requests. 
Navistar also agrees that it would be precluded from filing any of the 
following petitions for review: (1) Petitions challenging directly or 
indirectly individual certificates of conformity issued for a model 
year prior to the 2012 model year (excluding action exercising its 
rights regarding certifications of its own engines in any model year); 
and (2) petitions challenging a letter dated December 30, 2009 from the 
Director of the Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office 
of Transportation and Air Quality, providing revised guidance for 
certification of heavy-duty diesel engines using SCR technologies 
(``December 2009 Guidance''). However, Navistar reserves its right to 
exercise its rights regarding any changes or modifications to that 
guidance issued after the public process selected by EPA and retains 
all other rights and remedies to challenge EPA's final action that 
occurs following the public process selected by EPA.
    Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, EPA agrees to 
engage in a public process to reexamine its policies, for future model 
year 2011 and later heavy duty diesel engines, for operation of SCR-
equipped engines without DEF, with improper DEF, or when tampering (or 
some other defect in the SCR system) is detected. The public process 
will take the form of a workshop, hearing, or other public process. EPA 
will issue a public notice of the public process to be published in the 
Federal Register not later than June 30, 2010 or twenty-eight days 
after the date this Agreement becomes final, whichever is later. EPA 
will include in the public notice statements that: (a) The public 
process is designed to provide a thorough review of EPA's policies 
regarding operation of SCR-equipped heavy duty diesel engines without 
DEF, with improper DEF, or when tampering (or some other defect in the 
SCR system) is detected for future 2011 and later model year engines, 
in order to ensure, among other things, that SCR-equipped engines are 
designed to properly control emissions as required under applicable 
regulations; (b) it is appropriate for EPA to review and reexamine its 
policies as technologies are introduced into the marketplace; (c) EPA 
intends to review any information that has become available to 
determine whether its policies regarding SCR-equipped engines should be 
revised; and (d) the scope of the review includes the December 2009 
Guidance.
    EPA will conduct the selected public process not later than sixty 
days after the publication of the public notice in the Federal 
Register.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the 
proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as 
parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the 
Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed 
settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations 
that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, 
or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the 
Department of Justice determines, based on any comment submitted, that 
consent to this settlement agreement should be withdrawn, the terms of 
the agreement will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement 
Agreement

A. How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID 
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2010-0507) contains a copy of the proposed settlement 
agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing 
at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA 
Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 
Washington,

[[Page 36656]]

DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the 
telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566-1752.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through 
https://www.regulations.gov. You may use the https://www.regulations.gov 
to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the 
contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents 
in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the 
system, select ``search,'' then key in the appropriate docket 
identification number.
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments, 
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available 
for public viewing online at https://www.regulations.gov without change, 
unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information 
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by 
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the 
electronic public docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, 
including copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not 
be placed in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only 
in printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all 
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access 
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket 
Center.

B. How and to whom do i submit comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section. 
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified 
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period 
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these late 
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you 
include your name, mailing address, and an e-mail address or other 
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD 
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the 
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA 
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further 
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or 
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included 
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket, 
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot 
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you 
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the https://www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments 
to EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. 
The electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system, 
which means EPA will not know your identity, e-mail address, or other 
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. 
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail 
(e-mail) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an 
e-mail comment directly to the Docket without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address is automatically captured and 
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public 
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: June 21, 2010.
Richard B. Ossias,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-15645 Filed 6-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.