Announcement of Rural Cooperative Development Grant Application Deadlines, 36349-36356 [2010-15428]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices Read Applications: All applications will be available for public inspection at the office above during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(c)). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen W. Guagliardo, 202–720–7312 or Karen.W.Guagliardo@usda.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 7(f)(1) of the United States Grain Standards Act (USGSA) (7 U.S.C. 71– 87k) authorizes GIPSA’s Administrator to designate a qualified applicant to provide official services in a specified area after determining that the applicant is better able than any other applicant to provide such official services. Under section 7(g)(1) of the USGSA, designations of official agencies are effective for 3 years unless terminated by the Secretary, but may be renewed according to the criteria and procedures prescribed in section 7(f) of the Act. Areas Open for Designation Amarillo Pursuant to section 7(f)(2) of the Act, the following geographic areas, in the States of Oklahoma and Texas are assigned to this official agency: In Texas: • Bounded on the North by the TexasOklahoma State line; • Bounded on the East by the eastern Texas-Oklahoma State line south to the Childress County line; • Bounded on the South by the southern Childress County line to the western Childress County line north to U.S. Route 287; U.S. Route 287 northwest to Donley County; the southern Donley and Armstrong County lines west to Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River; Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River northwest to State Route 217; State Route 217 west to FM 1062; FM 1062 west to U.S. Route 385; U.S. Route 385 north to the southern Oldham County west; and • Bounded on the West by the western Oldham, Hartley, and Dallam County lines. In Oklahoma: • Beaver, Cimarron, and Texas Counties. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Cairo Pursuant to section 7(f)(2) of the Act, the following geographic areas, in the States of Illinois, Kentucky, and Tennessee are assigned to this official agency: In Illinois: • Bounded on the North from State Route 150 at the Mississippi River north to State Route 3; State Route 3 southeast to State Route 149; State Route 149 east to State Route 13; State Route 13 southeast to U.S. Route 51; U.S. Route VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 51 south to the northern Union County line; northern Union County east to the Ohio River; • Bounded on the East by the Ohio River; • Bounded on the South by the Ohio River west to the Mississippi River; and • Bounded on the West by the Mississippi River north to State Route 150. In Kentucky: • Ballard, McCracken, Livingston, Lyon, Trigg, Calloway, Marshall, Graves, Fulton, Hickman, and Carlisle Counties. In Tennessee: • Lake, Obion, Weakley, Henry, Stewart, Montgomery, Dickson, Houston, Benton, and Humphreys Counties. The Cargill, Inc., grain elevator in Tiptonville, Lake County, Tennessee, which is located within Cairo’s assigned areas, is currently serviced, and will continue to be serviced by Midsouth Grain Inspection Service. North Carolina Pursuant to section 7(f)(2) of the Act, the entire State of North Carolina, except those export port locations within the State which are serviced by GIPSA, is assigned to this official agency. Opportunity for Designation Interested persons or governmental agencies may apply for designation to provide official services in the geographic areas specified above under the provisions of section 7(f) of the USGSA and 7 CFR 800.196(d). Designation in the specified geographic areas is for the period beginning October 1, 2010, and ending September 30, 2013. To apply for designation or for more information, contact Karen W. Guagliardo at the address listed above or visit GIPSA’s Web site at http:// www.gipsa.usda.gov. We consider applications, comments, and other available information when determining which applicant will be designated. Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71–87k. J. Dudley Butler, Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration. [FR Doc. 2010–15458 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36349 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Business-Cooperative Service Announcement of Rural Cooperative Development Grant Application Deadlines AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice of funding availability. SUMMARY: USDA Rural Development announces the availability of approximately $7.924 million in competitive grant funds for the fiscal year (FY) 2010 Rural Cooperative Development Grant (RCDG) Program, as provided in the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub.L. 111– 80). The intended effect of this notice is to solicit applications for FY 2010 and award grants on or before August 15, 2010. The maximum award per grant is $225,000 and matching funds are required. In accordance with section 310B(e)(6)(B) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)) as amended by section 6013 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, the Secretary has determined that a grant period of one year is in the best interest of the program at this time. Applicants must read this notice carefully, as program requirements have changed. DATES: Applications for grants must be submitted on paper or electronically according to the following deadlines: Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Electronic copies must be received by August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. ADDRESSES: Application materials for a RCDG may be obtained at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ rcdg.htm or by contacting the applicant’s USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact information for State Offices can be found at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ Contacts.htm. Submit completed paper applications for a grant to Cooperative Programs, Attn: RCDG Program, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3250, Room 4016–South, Washington, DC 20250–3250. The phone number that should be used for courier delivery is (202) 720–8460. E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 36350 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices Submit electronic grant applications at http://www.grants.gov, following the instructions found on this Web site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit the program Web site at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ rcdg.htm for application assistance or contact your USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact information may be obtained at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/ rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm. Applicants are encouraged to contact their State Offices well in advance of the deadline to discuss their projects and ask any questions about the application process. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Overview Federal Agency: Rural BusinessCooperative Service (RBS). Funding Opportunity Title: Rural Cooperative Development Grant. Announcement Type: Initial announcement. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.771. Dates: Application Deadline: Completed applications for grants may be submitted on paper or electronically according to the following deadlines: Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Electronic copies must be received by August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. I. Funding Opportunity Description RCDGs are authorized by section 310B(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)) as amended by section 6013 of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008. Regulations implementing this authority are in 7 CFR part 4284, subparts A and F. The primary objective of the RCDG program is to improve the economic condition of rural areas through cooperative development. Grant funds are provided for the establishment and operation of Centers that have the expertise, or who can contract out for the expertise, to assist individuals or entities in the startup, expansion or operational improvement of rural businesses, especially cooperative or mutually-owned businesses (Section 310B(e)(5)). In addition, the Agency is interested specifically in projects designed to help cooperatives and mutually-owned businesses to create wealth in rural communities so that they are self-sustaining, repopulating, and thriving economically, using the following key USDA strategies: VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 i. Local and regional food systems as a strategy for encouraging production agriculture and related industries in new wealth creation; ii. Renewable energy generation, energy conservation, and/or climate change adaptation or mitigation as strategies for quality job creation; iii. Use of broadband and other critical infrastructure as a strategy to facilitate local entrepreneurship and expansion of market opportunities for small businesses; iv. Access to capital in rural areas as a strategy to ensure continuous business development and job creation/retention; and v. Innovative utilization of natural resources as a strategy to expand business opportunities. The program is administered through USDA Rural Development State Offices. Definitions The definitions published at 7 CFR 4284.3 and 7 CFR 4284.504 are incorporated by reference. The definition of ‘‘rural’’ and ‘‘rural area,’’ at section 343(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1991(a), as amended by Section 6018 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, are also incorporated by reference. In addition, since there has been some confusion on the Agency’s meaning of the term ‘‘conflict of interest,’’ the Agency is providing clarification on what it means by this term. Conflict of interest—A situation in which the ability of a person or entity to act impartially would be questionable due to competing professional or personal interests. An example of conflict of interest occurs when the grantee’s employees, board of directors, or the immediate family of either, have a legal or personal financial interest in the recipients receiving the benefits or services of the grant. Mutually—owned business—An organization owned and governed by members who either are its consumers, producers, employees, or suppliers. II. Award Information Type of Award: Grant. Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010. Approximate Total Funding: $7.924 million. Approximate Number of Awards: 35 Approximate Average Award: $225,000. Floor of Award Range: None. Ceiling of Award Range: $225,000. Anticipated Award Date: August 16, 2010. Budget Period Length: 12 months. Project Period Length: 12 months. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 III. Eligibility Information A. Eligible Applicants Grants may be made to nonprofit corporations and accredited institutions of higher education. Grants may not be made to public bodies or to individuals. B. Cost Sharing or Matching The matching fund requirement is 25 percent of the total project cost (5 percent in the case of 1994 Institutions). Applicants must verify in their applications that all matching funds are available during the grant period. If an applicant is awarded a grant, additional verification documentation regarding the availability of matching funds may be required. All of the matching funds must be spent on eligible expenses during the grant period, and must be from eligible sources. Unless provided by other authorizing legislation, other Federal grant funds cannot be used as matching funds. However, matching funds may include loan proceeds from Federal sources. Matching funds must be spent in advance or as a pro-rata portion of grant funds being expended. All of the matching funds must be provided by either the applicant or a third party in the form of cash or inkind contributions. The Center must be able to document and verify the number of hours worked and the value associated with the in-kind contribution. Due to the difficulty in distinguishing the responsibilities normally associated with board/ advisory council membership versus those directly associated with specific Center projects, the Agency will no longer accept board/advisory council members’ time as an eligible in-kind match contribution. However, in-kind contributions from board/advisory council members in the form of their travel, incidentals, etc. are acceptable if the Center has established written policies explaining how these costs are normally reimbursed, including rates, and an explanation of this policy is included in the application. Otherwise, the in-kind contributions will not be considered to be an eligible match and may cause the application to be determined ineligible for funding. Inkind contributions provided by individuals, businesses, or cooperatives which are being assisted by the Center can not be provided for the direct benefit of their own projects as USDA Rural Development considers this to be a conflict of interest or the appearance of a Conflict Of Interest. C. Other Eligibility Requirements Grant Period Eligibility: Applications should have a timeframe of no more E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices than 365 consecutive days with the time period beginning no earlier than October 1, 2010 and no later than January 3, 2011. Projects must be completed within the 1-year timeframe. The Agency may approve requests to extend the grant period for up to twelve months at the discretion of the Agency. However, should the grantee compete successfully for an RCDG grant during the subsequent grant cycle, the first grant must be closed before funds can be obligated for the subsequent grant. Completeness Eligibility: Applications without sufficient information to determine eligibility and scoring will be considered ineligible. Applications that are non-responsive to this notice will be considered ineligible. Activity Eligibility: Applications must propose the development or continuation of a cooperative development center concept or they will not be considered for funding. In addition, the following applications will not be considered for funding. Applications that: i. Focus assistance on only one cooperative or mutually-owned business. ii. Request more than the maximum grant amount. iii. Propose ineligible costs that equal more than 10 percent of the total project(Applications with ineligible costs of 10 percent or less of total project costs that are selected for funding must remove all ineligible costs from the budget and replace them with eligible activities or reduce the amount of the grant award accordingly). IV. Application and Submission Information A. Address To Request Application Package The application package for applying on paper for this funding opportunity can be obtained at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ rcdg.htm. For electronic applications, applicants must visit http:// www.grants.gov and follow the instructions. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES B. Submission Dates and Times Applicants may submit their applications to their State Rural Development Office for a preliminary review up to 45 days prior to the final application deadline published in this notice. The preliminary review will assess applicant and project eligibility, as well as completeness of the application in terms of presence of the required elements. Should the Agency identify missing or incomplete elements, the applicant will be notified VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 and given an opportunity to submit the missing elements before the final deadline published in the Federal Register. Missing elements will not be accepted after the final application deadline. This preliminary review is an informal assessment of the application and not a final evaluation of the application. Findings of the preliminary review are courtesy only and are not binding on the Agency nor are they appealable. Applications must be submitted on paper or electronically. Final paper applications must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Applications postmarked, mailed, or shipped after August 9, 2010 will not be processed. Final electronic applications must be received by August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. If the application is submitted electronically, the applicant must follow the instructions given at http:// www.grants.gov. Applicants are advised to visit the site well in advance of the application deadline if they plan to apply electronically to ensure they have obtained the proper authentication and have sufficient computer resources to complete the application. C. Content and Form of Submission An application guide may be viewed at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/ coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm. It is recommended that applicants use the template provided on the Web site. The template can be filled out electronically and printed out for submission with the required forms for paper submission or it can be filled out electronically and submitted as an attachment through http://www.grants.gov. The submission must include all pages of the application. It is recommended that the application be in black and white, not color. Those evaluating the application will only receive black and white images. The Agency will then screen all applications for eligibility to determine whether the application is sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in this notice to allow for an informed review. Information submitted as part of the application will be protected to the extent permitted by law. An application guide and forms are available online at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ rcdg/rcdg.htm Applicants must complete and submit the following elements as part of the application package. 1. Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for Federal Assistance,’’ must be completed, signed, and must include a DUNS number. The DUNS number is a nine- PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36351 digit identification number which uniquely identifies business entities. There is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access http://www.dnb.com/us/ or call 866–705–5711. For more information, see the RCDG web site at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ rcdg/rcdg.htm or contact the applicant’s USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact information for State Offices can be found at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ Contacts.htm. 2. Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget Information—Non-Construction Programs,’’ must be completed and signed. 3. Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—NonConstruction Programs,’’ must be completed and signed. 4. Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants. The Agency is required to make this survey available to all nonprofit applicants. Submission of this form is voluntary. 5. Title Page. To include the title of the project as well as any other relevant identifying information. 6. Table of Contents. To facilitate review, include page numbers for each component of the application. 7. Executive Summary. A summary of the proposal, not to exceed two pages, must briefly describe the Center, including project goals and tasks to be accomplished, the amount requested, how the work will be performed (e.g., Center staff, consultants, or contractors) and the percentage of work that will be performed among the parties. 8. Eligibility Discussion. The applicant must describe, not to exceed two pages, how it meets the applicant, matching, grant period and activity eligibility requirements. 9. Proposal Narrative. The proposal narrative is limited to a total of 40 pages. i. Project Title. The title of the proposed project must be brief, not to exceed 75 characters, yet describe the essentials of the project. If a title page was included under number 5 above, it is not necessary to include an additional title page under this section. ii. Information Sheet. A separate onepage information sheet listing each of the evaluation criteria referenced in this funding announcement, followed by the page numbers of all relevant material and documentation contained in the proposal that address or support the criteria. If the evaluation criteria are listed on the Table of Contents and specifically and individually addressed in narrative form, then it is not necessary to include an information sheet under this section. E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES 36352 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices iii. Goals of the Project. The applicant must include the following statements in this section of the narrative to demonstrate that the Center is following these statutory requirements: 1. A statement that substantiates that the Center will effectively serve rural areas in the United States; 2. A statement that the primary objective of the Center will be to improve the economic condition of rural areas through cooperative development; 3. A description of the contributions that the proposed activities are likely to make to the improvement of the economic conditions of the rural areas for which the Center will provide services. Expected economic impacts should be tied to tasks included in the work plan and budget; and 4. A statement that the Center, in carrying out its activities, will seek, where appropriate, the advice, participation, expertise, and assistance of representatives of business, industry, educational institutions, the Federal government, and State and local governments. iv. Performance Measures. The Agency has established annual performance evaluation measures to evaluate the RCDG program. Applicants must provide estimates on the following performance evaluation measures. • Number of groups who are not legal entities assisted. • Number of businesses that are not cooperatives assisted. • Number of cooperatives assisted. • Number of businesses incorporated that are not cooperatives. • Number of cooperatives incorporated. • Total number of jobs created as a result of assistance (Note: where not relevant—housing, for example—the applicant should suggest a more relevant performance measure). • Total number of jobs saved as a result of assistance (Note: where not appropriate—housing, for example—the applicant should suggest a more appropriate performance measure). • Number of jobs created for the Center as a result of RCDG funding. • Number of jobs saved for the Center as a result of RCDG funding. If selected for funding, the applicant will be required to report actual numbers for these performance elements on a semi-annual basis and in the final performance report. Additional information on post-award requirements can be found in Section VI. Applicants must also suggest additional performance elements in the event the proposal receives grant funding. These additional criteria should be specific, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 measurable performance elements, but are not binding on USDA. v. Undertakings. The applicant must describe in the application how it will undertake to do each of the following: 1. Take all practicable steps to develop continuing sources of financial support for the Center, particularly from sources in the private sectors; 2. Make arrangements for the Center’s activities to be monitored and evaluated; and 3. Provide an accounting for the money received by the grantee in accordance with 7 CFR part 4284, subpart F. vi. Work Plan and Budget (should be presented under proposal evaluation criterion number 6, utilizing the specific requirements in section V.A.6). vii. Delivery of Technical Assistance and Other Services Delivery of technical assistance in rural areas to promote and assist the development of cooperatively and mutually-owned businesses should be described under proposal evaluation criterion number 2, utilizing the specific requirements under section V.A.2. viii. Qualifications of Personnel (should be presented under proposal evaluation criterion number 7, utilizing the specific requirements under section V.A.7.). ix. Local Support (should be described under proposal evaluation criterion number 8, utilizing the requirements in section V.A.8.). x. Future Support (should be described under proposal evaluation criterion number 9, utilizing the specific requirements under V.A.9.). xi. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the evaluation criteria referenced in this funding announcement must be specifically and individually addressed in narrative form. Applications that do not address all of the proposal evaluation criteria will be considered ineligible. See Section V.A. for a description of the Proposal Evaluation Criteria. 10. Certification of Judgment Owed to the United States. Applicants must certify that there are no current outstanding Federal judgments against them. No grant funds shall be used to pay a judgment obtained by the United States other than judgment in tax court. It is suggested that applicants use the following language for the certification. ‘‘[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that the United States has not obtained an unsatisfied judgment against it and will not use grant funds to pay any judgments obtained by the United States.’’ A separate signature is not required. 11. Certification of Matching Funds. Applicants must certify that matching PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 funds will be available at the same time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that expenditures of matching funds are pro-rated, such that for every dollar of the total project cost, not less than the required amount of matching funds will have been expended prior to submitting the request for reimbursement. Please note that this certification is a separate requirement from the Verification of Matching Funds requirement. To satisfy the Certification requirement, applicants should include this statement for this section: ‘‘[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that matching funds will be available at the same time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that expenditures of matching funds shall be pro-rated, such that * * * and that matching funds will be spent in advance of grant funding, such that for every dollar of the total project cost, at least 25 cents (5 cents for 1994 Institutions) of matching funds will have been expended prior to submitting the request for reimbursement.’’ A separate signature is not required. In the case of fund advances, the applicant will certify that for every dollar of funds advanced, at least 25 cents (5 cents for 1994 Institutions) of matching funds will be expended. 12. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide documentation of all proposed matching funds, both cash and in-kind. Matching funds must be used for eligible purposes and expenditures for this grant program. The documentation must be included in Appendix A of the application and will not count towards the 40-page limitation. Template letters for each type of matching funds are available at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/ rcdg/verifymatchsample.doc. If matching funds are to be provided in cash, the following requirements must be met at the time of application. Additional documentation may be required if a grant is awarded. Applicant: The application must include a statement verifying (1) the amount of the cash and (2) the source of the cash. If the applicant is paying for goods and/or services as part of the matching funds contribution, the expenditure is considered a cash match, and should be verified as such. Third-party: The application must include a signed letter from the third party verifying (1) how much cash will be donated and (2) that it will be available corresponding to the proposed grant period or donated on a specific date within the grant period. Cash matching contributions from thirdparties are to be used for Center operations and cannot be used to provide services which directly benefit E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices the third-party contributor. Contributors of cash matching contributions may not limit or direct how or where the Center may use the contributions. If matching funds are to be provided by an in-kind donation, the following requirements must be met. Applicant: The application must include a signed letter from the applicant or its authorized representative verifying (1) the nature of the goods and/or services to be donated and how they will be used, (2) when the goods and/or services will be donated (i.e., corresponding to the proposed grant period or to specific dates within the grant period), and (3) the value of the goods and/or services. Third-Party: The application must include a signed letter from the third party verifying (1) the nature of the goods and/or services to be donated and how they will be used, (2) when the goods and/or services will be donated (i.e., corresponding to the proposed grant period or to specific dates within the grant period when matching contributions will be made available), and (3) the value of the goods and/or services. It should be noted that nonprofit or other organizations contributing the services of affiliated volunteers must follow the third-party verification requirement above, for each individual volunteer. Applicants should note the following: • Only goods or services for which no expenditure is made can be considered in-kind. • In-kind contributions that are overvalued will not be accepted. The valuation process for in-kind funds does not need to be included in the application, but the applicant must be able to demonstrate how the valuation was derived at the time of notification of tentative selection for the grant award, or the grant award may be withdrawn or the amount of the grant may be reduced. Matching funds donated outside the proposed time period of the grant will not be accepted. • Examples of unacceptable matching funds are in-kind contributions from individuals, businesses, or cooperatives being assisted by the Center to benefit their own project; donations of fixed equipment and buildings; and costs related to the preparation of the RCDG application package. Expected program income may not be used to fulfill the matching funds requirement at the time of application. However, if there are contracts to provide services in place at the time of application, they may be treated as cash match. If program income is earned during the time period of the grant, it is subject to applicable requirements of 7 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 CFR part 3015, subpart F and 7 CFR part 3019.24 and any provisions in the Grant Agreement. D. Submission Dates and Times Application Deadline Date: August 9, 2010. Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by the deadline date (see Section IV.G for the address). Electronic applications must be received by http://www.grants.gov by the deadline date. If the application does not meet the deadline above, it will not be considered for funding. The applicant will be notified if the application does not meet the submission requirements. The applicant will also be notified by mail or by e-mail if the application is received on time. E. Intergovernmental Review of Applications Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental review of Federal programs, applies to this program. This EO requires that Federal agencies provide opportunities for consultation on proposed assistance with State and local governments. Many states have established a Single Point of Contact (SPOC) to facilitate this consultation. For a list of states that maintain an SPOC, please see the White House Web site: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/ grants/spoc.html. If an applicant’s state has an SPOC, the applicant may submit a copy of the application directly for review. Any comments obtained through the SPOC must be provided to USDA Rural Development for consideration as part of the application. If the applicant’s state has not established an SPOC, or the applicant does not want to submit a copy of the application, USDA Rural Development will submit the application to the SPOC or other appropriate agency or agencies. Applicants are also encouraged to contact the USDA Rural Development State Office for assistance and questions on this process. Contact information for USDA Rural Development State Offices can be viewed at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ Contacts.htm. F. Funding Restrictions Funding restrictions apply to both grant funds and matching funds. Grant funds may be used to pay up to 75 percent (95 percent where the grantee is a 1994 Institution) of the total project cost. 1. Grant funds and matching funds may be used for, but are not limited to, providing the following to individuals, small businesses, cooperative and mutually-owned businesses and other PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36353 similar entities in rural areas served by the Center (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)(5)and 7 U.S.C. 1932(e)(4)(c)): i. Applied research, feasibility, environmental and other studies that may be useful for the purpose of cooperative development. ii. Collection, interpretation and dissemination of principles, facts, technical knowledge, or other information for the purpose of cooperative development. iii. Training and instruction for the purpose of cooperative development. iv. Loans and grants for the purpose of cooperative development in accordance with this notice and applicable regulations. v. Technical assistance, research services and advisory services for the purpose of cooperative development. vi. Programs providing for the coordination of services and sharing of information among the Centers (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)(4)(C)(vi). 2. No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used for any of the following activities: i. To duplicate current services or replace or substitute support previously provided. If the current service is inadequate, however, grant funds may be used to expand the level of effort or services beyond that which is currently being provided; ii. To pay costs of preparing the application package for funding under this program; iii. To pay costs of the project incurred prior to the date of grant approval; iv. To fund political or lobbying activities; v. To pay for assistance to any private business enterprise that does not have at least 51 percent ownership by those who are either citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after being legally admitted for permanent residence; vi. To pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States; vii. To plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a building or facility, including a processing facility; viii. To purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment, including laboratory equipment or processing machinery; ix. To pay for the repair of privately owned vehicles; x. To pay for the operating costs of any recipient entity. xi. To fund research and development; xii. To pay costs of the project where a conflict of interest exists; or xiii. To fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 or 3019. E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 36354 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices G. Other Submission Requirements A paper application for a grant must be submitted to Cooperative Programs, Attn: RCDG Program, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3250, Room 4016–South, Washington, DC 20250–3250. The phone number that should be used for courier delivery is (202) 720–8460. Electronically submitted applications must apply using the following Internet address: http://www.grants.gov. Applications may not be submitted by electronic mail, facsimile, or by hand-delivery. Each application submission must contain all required documents. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES V. Application Review Information A. Proposal Evaluation Criteria All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on the following criteria. Evaluators will base scores only on the information provided or crossreferenced by page number in each individual evaluation criterion. The maximum amount of points available is 100. Note: Newly established or proposed Centers that do not yet have a track record on which to evaluate the following criteria should refer to the expertise and track records of staff or consultants expected to perform tasks related to the respective criteria. Proposed or newly established Centers must be organized well-enough at time of application to address its capabilities for meeting these criteria. 1. Administrative capabilities in support of Center activities. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the application to determine whether the applicant demonstrates a proven track record in carrying out activities in support of development assistance to cooperatively and mutually owned businesses. At a minimum, applicants must discuss the following capabilities: i. Financial systems and audit controls; ii. Personnel and program administration performance measures; iii. Clear written rules of governance; and iv. Experience administering Federal grant funding, including but not limited to past RCDG’s. Applicants that discuss the Center’s administrative capabilities and track record, versus those of umbrella or supporting institutions, such as universities or parent organizations, will score higher. 2. Technical assistance and other services. (maximum score of 15 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s demonstrated expertise in providing technical assistance and VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 accomplishing effective outcomes in rural areas to promote and assist the development of cooperatively and mutually-owned businesses. The applicant must discuss: i. Their potential for delivering effective technical assistance: ii. The types of assistance provided: iii. The expected effects of that assistance; iv. The sustainability of organizations receiving the assistance; and v. The transferability of its cooperative development strategies and focus to other areas of the U.S. Applicants that evidence effective delivery systems for cooperative development will score higher. Applicants that discuss the demonstrated expertise specific to the Center (as opposed to umbrella or supporting institutions such as universities or parent organizations) will score higher. 3. Economic development. (maximum score of 15 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s demonstrated ability to facilitate: i. Establishment of cooperatives or mutually-owned businesses, ii. New cooperative approaches, and iii. Retention of businesses, generation of employment opportunities or other factors, as applicable, that will otherwise improve the economic conditions of rural areas. Applicants that provide statistics for historical and potential development and identify their role in economic development outcomes will score higher. 4. Networking and regional focus. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s demonstrated commitment to: i. Networking with other cooperative development centers, and other organizations involved in rural economic development efforts, as well as, ii. Developing multi-organization and multi-state approaches to addressing the economic development and cooperative needs of rural areas. New or proposed Centers are expected to be developed enough to address this criteria. 5. Commitment. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s commitment to providing technical assistance and other services to under-served and economically distressed areas in rural areas of the United States. Applicants that define and describe the underserved and economically distressed areas within their service area, provide statistics, and identify projects within or affecting these areas, as appropriate, will score higher. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 6. Work Plan/Budget. (maximum score of 10 points) The work plan will be reviewed for detailed actions and an accompanying timetable for implementing the proposal. Clear, logical, realistic and efficient plans will result in a higher score. Budgets will be reviewed for completeness and the quality of non-Federal funding commitments. Applicants must discuss: i. Specific tasks (whether it be by type of service or specific project) to be completed using grant and matching funds; ii. How customers will be identified; iii. Key personnel; and iv. The evaluation methods to be used to determine the success of specific tasks and overall objectives of Center operations. The budget must present a breakdown of the estimated costs associated with cooperative development activities as well as the operation of the Center and allocate these costs to each of the tasks to be undertaken. Matching funds as well as grant funds must be accounted for in the budget. 7. Qualifications of those Performing the Tasks. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the application to determine if the personnel expected to perform key tasks have a track record of: i. Positive solutions for complex cooperative development and/or marketing problems; or ii. A successful record of conducting accurate feasibility studies, business plans, marketing analysis, or other activities relevant to applicant’s success as determined by the tasks identified in the applicants work plan; and iii. Whether the personnel expected to perform the tasks are full/part-time employees of the applicant or are contract personnel. Applicants that evidence commitment/availability of qualified personnel expected to perform the tasks will score higher. 8. Local support. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate applications for previous and/or expected local support for the applicant, and plans for coordinating with other developmental organizations in the proposed service area or with state and local government institutions. Applicants that evidence strong support from potential beneficiaries and formal evidence of intent to coordinate with other developmental organizations will score higher. Support should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. The applicant may also submit a maximum of 10 letters of support or intent to coordinate with the application. These letters should be included in Appendix B of the E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices application and will not count against the 40-page limit for the narrative. 9. Future support. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s vision for funding its operations in future years. Applicants should document: i. New and existing funding sources that support its goals; ii. Alternative funding sources that reduce reliance on Federal, State, and local grants; and iii. The use of in-house personnel for providing services versus contracting out for that expertise. Applications that evidence vision and likelihood of long-term sustainability with diversification of funding sources and building in-house technical assistance capacity will score higher. 10. Special Emphasis. (maximum score 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant’s demonstrated ability to implement projects designed to help cooperatives and mutuallyowned businesses to create wealth in rural communities so that they are selfsustaining, repopulating, and thriving economically, using the following key USDA strategies: vi. Local and regional food systems as a strategy for encouraging production agriculture and related industries in new wealth creation; vii. Renewable energy generation, energy conservation, and/or climate change adaptation or mitigation as strategies for quality job creation; viii. Use of broadband and other critical infrastructure as a strategy to facilitate local entrepreneurship and expansion of market opportunities for small businesses; ix. Access to capital in rural areas as a strategy to ensure continuous business development and job creation/retention; and x. Innovative utilization of natural resources as a strategy to expand business opportunities. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES B. Review and Selection Process The Agency will screen all of the proposals to determine whether the application is eligible and sufficiently responsive to the requirements set forth in this notice to allow for an informed review. The Agency will evaluate applications using a panel of qualified reviewers who will score the applications in accordance with the point allocation specified in this notice. Applications will be submitted to the Administrator in rank order, together with funding level recommendations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates Award Date: The announcement of award selections is expected to occur on or about August 16, 2010. VI. Award Administration Information A. Award Notices Successful applicants will receive a notification of tentative selection for funding from USDA Rural Development. Applicants must comply with all applicable statutes and regulations before the grant award will be approved. Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification by mail, including appeal rights, as appropriate. Consolidated comments for reviewed applications will be made available. B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements 7 CFR parts 3015, 3019, and 4284 are applicable to this program. To view these regulations, please see the following Internet address: http:// www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-tablesearch.html. The following additional requirements apply to grantees selected for this program: • Grant Agreement. • Letter of Conditions. • Form RD 1940–1, ‘‘Request for Obligation of Funds.’’ • Form RD 1942–46, ‘‘Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions.’’ • Form AD–1047, ‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered Transactions.’’ • Form AD–1048, ‘‘Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary ExclusionLower Tier Covered Transactions.’’ • Form AD–1049, ‘‘Certification Regarding Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (Grants).’’ • Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance Agreement.’’ • RD Instruction 1940–Q, Exhibit A– 1, ‘‘Certification for Contracts, Grants and Loans,’’ including Standard Form (SF) LLL, ‘‘Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.’’ Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act This Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) has been reviwed in accordance with 7 CFR Part 1940, subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’ Rural Development has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement is not required because the issuance of regulations and instructions, as well as amendments to them, describing administrative and financial procedures for processing, approving, and PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 36355 implementing the Agency’s financial programs is categorically excluded in the Agency’s NEPA regulation found at 7 CFR 1940.310(e) of Subpart G, Environmental Program. Thus, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C 4321–4347), Rural Development has determined that this NOFA does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Furthermore, individual awards under this NOFA are hereby classified ad Categorical Exclusions according to 1940.310(e), the award of financial assistance for planning purposes, management and feasibility studies, or environmental impact analyses, which do not require any additional documentation. Additional information on these requirements can be found at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ rcdg.htm. Reporting Requirements: Grantees must provide USDA Rural Development with an original or electronic copy that includes all required signatures of the following reports. The reports should be submitted to the Agency contact listed on the Grant Agreement and Letter of Conditions. Failure to submit satisfactory reports on time may result in suspension or termination of the grant. 1. Form SF–425. A ‘‘Federal Financial Report,’’ listing expenditures according to agreed upon budget categories, on a semi-annual basis. Reporting periods end each March 31 and September 30. Reports are due 30 days after the reporting period ends. 2. Semi-annual performance reports that compare accomplishments to the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed to date and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the original schedule provided in the work plan is not being met, the report should discuss the problems or delays that may affect completion of the project. Objectives for the next reporting period should be listed. Compliance with any special conditions on the use of award funds should be discussed. The report should also include a summary at the end of the report with the following elements to assist in documenting the annual performance goals of the RCDG program for Congress. • Number of groups who are not legal entities assisted. • Number of businesses that are not cooperatives assisted. • Number of cooperatives assisted. • Number of businesses incorporated that are not cooperatives. E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 36356 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Notices mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES • Number of cooperatives incorporated. • Total number of jobs created as a result of assistance (Note: where not relevant-housing, for example—the applicant should suggest a more relevant performance measure). • Total number of jobs saved as a result of assistance (Note: where not relevant-housing, for example—the applicant should suggest a more relevant performance measure). • Number of jobs created for the Center as a result of RCDG funding. • Number of jobs saved for the Center as a result of RCDG funding. • Additional performance measures identified by the grantee in Section 4(iv) of the application and accepted as binding in the Grant Agreement. Need something for any additional performance measures suggested by applicant and adopted by USDA. Reports are due as provided in paragraph 1 of this section. Supporting documentation must also be submitted for completed tasks. The supporting documentation for completed tasks includes, but is not limited to: Feasibility studies, marketing plans, business plans, publication quality success stories, applied research reports, copies of surveys conducted, articles of incorporation and bylaws and an accounting of how outreach, training, and other funds were expended. 3. Final project performance reports. These reports shall include all of the requirements of the semi-annual performance reports and responses to the following: i. What have been the most challenging or unexpected aspects of this program? ii. What advice would the grantee give to other organizations planning a similar program? These should include strengths and limitations of the program. If the grantee had the opportunity, what would they have done differently? iii. If an innovative approach was used successfully, the grantee should describe their program in detail so that other organizations might consider replication in their areas. The final performance report is due within 90 days of the completion of the project. VII. Agency Contacts For general questions about this announcement and for program technical assistance, applicants should contact their USDA Rural Development State Office at http:// www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/ Contacts.htm. If an applicant is unable to contact their State Office, please VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:23 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 contact a nearby State Office or the USDA Rural Development National Office at 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3250, Room. 4016– South, Washington, DC 20250–3250, telephone: (202) 720–8460, e-mail: cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov. VIII. Nondiscrimination Statement The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720– 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (866) 632–9992 (voice) or (202) 401–0216 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Dated: June 17, 2010. Judith A. Canales, Administrator, Rural Business Cooperative Service. [FR Doc. 2010–15428 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Announcement of Changes to the Membership of the Performance Review Board AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of Performance Review Board Membership. SUMMARY: The regulations at 5 CFR 430.310 require agencies to publish notice of Performance Review Board appointees in the Federal Register before their service begins. In accordance with those regulations, this notice announces changes to the membership of the International Trade Administration’s Performance Review Board. DATES: Effective Date: The changes made to the Performance Review Board is effective June 25, 2010. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronda L. Holbrook, Department of Commerce Human Resources Operations Center (DOCHROC), Office of Executive Resources Operations, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Room C–200, Washington, DC 20230, at (202) 482–5243. On October 6, 2009, the International Trade Administration (ITA) published its list of Performance Review Board appointees pursuant to the regulations at 5 CFR 430.310 (74 FR 51261). The purpose of the Performance Review Board is to review and make recommendations to the appointing authority on performance management issues such as appraisals, bonuses, pay level increases, and Presidential Rank Awards for members of the Senior Executive Service. ITA publishes this notice to announce changes to the Performance Review Board’s membership. As of June 25, 2010, ITA removes Mr. David M. Robinson from the Board because he is no longer at ITA and appoints Ms. Rochelle J. Lipsitz for a two-year term. ITA also appoints Mr. Walter M. Bastian to serve as Chair of the Performance Review Board, and updates the title for Ms. Patricia M. Sefcik. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For the public’s convenience, an updated membership list of the Performance Review Board is provided below. 1. Walter M. Bastian, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere, ITA (Chair). 2. Patricia A. Sefcik, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Administration, ITA. 3. Rochelle J. Lipsitz, Deputy Director General of the U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service, ITA (new). 4. Edward C. Yang, Senior Director, China Non-Market Economy Compliance Unit, ITA. 5. Joel Secundy, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Services, ITA. 6. Lisa A. Casias, Director for Financial Management, OS. Dated: June 18, 2010. Susan Boggs, Director, Office of Staffing, Recruitment and Classification, Department of Commerce Human Resources Operations Center. [FR Doc. 2010–15432 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36349-36356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Business-Cooperative Service


Announcement of Rural Cooperative Development Grant Application 
Deadlines

AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of funding availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: USDA Rural Development announces the availability of 
approximately $7.924 million in competitive grant funds for the fiscal 
year (FY) 2010 Rural Cooperative Development Grant (RCDG) Program, as 
provided in the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 (Pub.L. 
111-80). The intended effect of this notice is to solicit applications 
for FY 2010 and award grants on or before August 15, 2010. The maximum 
award per grant is $225,000 and matching funds are required. In 
accordance with section 310B(e)(6)(B) of the Consolidated Farm and 
Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)) as amended by section 6013 of 
the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, the Secretary has 
determined that a grant period of one year is in the best interest of 
the program at this time.
    Applicants must read this notice carefully, as program requirements 
have changed.

DATES: Applications for grants must be submitted on paper or 
electronically according to the following deadlines:
    Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent 
overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 
grant funding. Late applications are not eligible for FY 2010 grant 
funding.
    Electronic copies must be received by August 9, 2010, to be 
eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. Late applications are not eligible 
for FY 2010 grant funding.

ADDRESSES: Application materials for a RCDG may be obtained at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm or by contacting the 
applicant's USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact information 
for State Offices can be found at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm. Submit completed paper applications for a grant to 
Cooperative Programs, Attn: RCDG Program, 1400 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Mail Stop 3250, Room 4016-South, Washington, DC 20250-3250. The 
phone number that should be used for courier delivery is (202) 720-
8460.

[[Page 36350]]

    Submit electronic grant applications at http://www.grants.gov, 
following the instructions found on this Web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Visit the program Web site at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm for application assistance 
or contact your USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact 
information may be obtained at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm. Applicants are encouraged to contact their State 
Offices well in advance of the deadline to discuss their projects and 
ask any questions about the application process.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Overview

    Federal Agency: Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS).
    Funding Opportunity Title: Rural Cooperative Development Grant.
    Announcement Type: Initial announcement.
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 10.771.
    Dates: Application Deadline: Completed applications for grants may 
be submitted on paper or electronically according to the following 
deadlines:
    Paper copies must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or sent 
overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 
grant funding. Electronic copies must be received by August 9, 2010, to 
be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding.
    Late applications are not eligible for FY 2010 grant funding.

I. Funding Opportunity Description

    RCDGs are authorized by section 310B(e) of the Consolidated Farm 
and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)) as amended by section 6013 
of the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008. Regulations 
implementing this authority are in 7 CFR part 4284, subparts A and F. 
The primary objective of the RCDG program is to improve the economic 
condition of rural areas through cooperative development. Grant funds 
are provided for the establishment and operation of Centers that have 
the expertise, or who can contract out for the expertise, to assist 
individuals or entities in the startup, expansion or operational 
improvement of rural businesses, especially cooperative or mutually-
owned businesses (Section 310B(e)(5)). In addition, the Agency is 
interested specifically in projects designed to help cooperatives and 
mutually-owned businesses to create wealth in rural communities so that 
they are self-sustaining, repopulating, and thriving economically, 
using the following key USDA strategies:
    i. Local and regional food systems as a strategy for encouraging 
production agriculture and related industries in new wealth creation;
    ii. Renewable energy generation, energy conservation, and/or 
climate change adaptation or mitigation as strategies for quality job 
creation;
    iii. Use of broadband and other critical infrastructure as a 
strategy to facilitate local entrepreneurship and expansion of market 
opportunities for small businesses;
    iv. Access to capital in rural areas as a strategy to ensure 
continuous business development and job creation/retention; and
    v. Innovative utilization of natural resources as a strategy to 
expand business opportunities.
    The program is administered through USDA Rural Development State 
Offices.

Definitions

    The definitions published at 7 CFR 4284.3 and 7 CFR 4284.504 are 
incorporated by reference. The definition of ``rural'' and ``rural 
area,'' at section 343(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1991(a), as amended by Section 6018 of the 
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, are also incorporated by 
reference. In addition, since there has been some confusion on the 
Agency's meaning of the term ``conflict of interest,'' the Agency is 
providing clarification on what it means by this term.
    Conflict of interest--A situation in which the ability of a person 
or entity to act impartially would be questionable due to competing 
professional or personal interests. An example of conflict of interest 
occurs when the grantee's employees, board of directors, or the 
immediate family of either, have a legal or personal financial interest 
in the recipients receiving the benefits or services of the grant.
    Mutually--owned business--An organization owned and governed by 
members who either are its consumers, producers, employees, or 
suppliers.

II. Award Information

    Type of Award: Grant.
    Fiscal Year Funds: FY 2010.
    Approximate Total Funding: $7.924 million.
    Approximate Number of Awards: 35
    Approximate Average Award: $225,000.
    Floor of Award Range: None.
    Ceiling of Award Range: $225,000.
    Anticipated Award Date: August 16, 2010.
    Budget Period Length: 12 months.
    Project Period Length: 12 months.

III. Eligibility Information

A. Eligible Applicants

    Grants may be made to nonprofit corporations and accredited 
institutions of higher education. Grants may not be made to public 
bodies or to individuals.

B. Cost Sharing or Matching

    The matching fund requirement is 25 percent of the total project 
cost (5 percent in the case of 1994 Institutions). Applicants must 
verify in their applications that all matching funds are available 
during the grant period. If an applicant is awarded a grant, additional 
verification documentation regarding the availability of matching funds 
may be required. All of the matching funds must be spent on eligible 
expenses during the grant period, and must be from eligible sources. 
Unless provided by other authorizing legislation, other Federal grant 
funds cannot be used as matching funds. However, matching funds may 
include loan proceeds from Federal sources. Matching funds must be 
spent in advance or as a pro-rata portion of grant funds being 
expended. All of the matching funds must be provided by either the 
applicant or a third party in the form of cash or in-kind 
contributions. The Center must be able to document and verify the 
number of hours worked and the value associated with the in-kind 
contribution. Due to the difficulty in distinguishing the 
responsibilities normally associated with board/advisory council 
membership versus those directly associated with specific Center 
projects, the Agency will no longer accept board/advisory council 
members' time as an eligible in-kind match contribution. However, in-
kind contributions from board/advisory council members in the form of 
their travel, incidentals, etc. are acceptable if the Center has 
established written policies explaining how these costs are normally 
reimbursed, including rates, and an explanation of this policy is 
included in the application. Otherwise, the in-kind contributions will 
not be considered to be an eligible match and may cause the application 
to be determined ineligible for funding. In-kind contributions provided 
by individuals, businesses, or cooperatives which are being assisted by 
the Center can not be provided for the direct benefit of their own 
projects as USDA Rural Development considers this to be a conflict of 
interest or the appearance of a Conflict Of Interest.

C. Other Eligibility Requirements

    Grant Period Eligibility: Applications should have a timeframe of 
no more

[[Page 36351]]

than 365 consecutive days with the time period beginning no earlier 
than October 1, 2010 and no later than January 3, 2011. Projects must 
be completed within the 1-year timeframe. The Agency may approve 
requests to extend the grant period for up to twelve months at the 
discretion of the Agency. However, should the grantee compete 
successfully for an RCDG grant during the subsequent grant cycle, the 
first grant must be closed before funds can be obligated for the 
subsequent grant.
    Completeness Eligibility: Applications without sufficient 
information to determine eligibility and scoring will be considered 
ineligible. Applications that are non-responsive to this notice will be 
considered ineligible.
    Activity Eligibility: Applications must propose the development or 
continuation of a cooperative development center concept or they will 
not be considered for funding. In addition, the following applications 
will not be considered for funding. Applications that:
    i. Focus assistance on only one cooperative or mutually-owned 
business.
    ii. Request more than the maximum grant amount.
    iii. Propose ineligible costs that equal more than 10 percent of 
the total project(Applications with ineligible costs of 10 percent or 
less of total project costs that are selected for funding must remove 
all ineligible costs from the budget and replace them with eligible 
activities or reduce the amount of the grant award accordingly).

IV. Application and Submission Information

A. Address To Request Application Package

    The application package for applying on paper for this funding 
opportunity can be obtained at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm. For electronic applications, applicants must visit 
http://www.grants.gov and follow the instructions.

B. Submission Dates and Times

    Applicants may submit their applications to their State Rural 
Development Office for a preliminary review up to 45 days prior to the 
final application deadline published in this notice. The preliminary 
review will assess applicant and project eligibility, as well as 
completeness of the application in terms of presence of the required 
elements. Should the Agency identify missing or incomplete elements, 
the applicant will be notified and given an opportunity to submit the 
missing elements before the final deadline published in the Federal 
Register. Missing elements will not be accepted after the final 
application deadline. This preliminary review is an informal assessment 
of the application and not a final evaluation of the application. 
Findings of the preliminary review are courtesy only and are not 
binding on the Agency nor are they appealable. Applications must be 
submitted on paper or electronically.
    Final paper applications must be postmarked and mailed, shipped, or 
sent overnight no later than August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 
grant funding. Applications postmarked, mailed, or shipped after August 
9, 2010 will not be processed. Final electronic applications must be 
received by August 9, 2010, to be eligible for FY 2010 grant funding. 
If the application is submitted electronically, the applicant must 
follow the instructions given at http://www.grants.gov. Applicants are 
advised to visit the site well in advance of the application deadline 
if they plan to apply electronically to ensure they have obtained the 
proper authentication and have sufficient computer resources to 
complete the application.

C. Content and Form of Submission

    An application guide may be viewed at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm. It is recommended that applicants use the 
template provided on the Web site. The template can be filled out 
electronically and printed out for submission with the required forms 
for paper submission or it can be filled out electronically and 
submitted as an attachment through http://www.grants.gov.
    The submission must include all pages of the application. It is 
recommended that the application be in black and white, not color. 
Those evaluating the application will only receive black and white 
images.
    The Agency will then screen all applications for eligibility to 
determine whether the application is sufficiently responsive to the 
requirements set forth in this notice to allow for an informed review. 
Information submitted as part of the application will be protected to 
the extent permitted by law. An application guide and forms are 
available online at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm
    Applicants must complete and submit the following elements as part 
of the application package.
    1. Form SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance,'' must be 
completed, signed, and must include a DUNS number. The DUNS number is a 
nine-digit identification number which uniquely identifies business 
entities. There is no charge. To obtain a DUNS number, access http://www.dnb.com/us/or call 866-705-5711. For more information, see the RCDG 
web site at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm or 
contact the applicant's USDA Rural Development State Office. Contact 
information for State Offices can be found at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm.
    2. Form SF-424A, ``Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs,'' 
must be completed and signed.
    3. Form SF-424B, ``Assurances--Non-Construction Programs,'' must be 
completed and signed.
    4. Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity for Applicants. The Agency 
is required to make this survey available to all nonprofit applicants. 
Submission of this form is voluntary.
    5. Title Page. To include the title of the project as well as any 
other relevant identifying information.
    6. Table of Contents. To facilitate review, include page numbers 
for each component of the application.
    7. Executive Summary. A summary of the proposal, not to exceed two 
pages, must briefly describe the Center, including project goals and 
tasks to be accomplished, the amount requested, how the work will be 
performed (e.g., Center staff, consultants, or contractors) and the 
percentage of work that will be performed among the parties.
    8. Eligibility Discussion. The applicant must describe, not to 
exceed two pages, how it meets the applicant, matching, grant period 
and activity eligibility requirements.
    9. Proposal Narrative. The proposal narrative is limited to a total 
of 40 pages.
    i. Project Title. The title of the proposed project must be brief, 
not to exceed 75 characters, yet describe the essentials of the 
project. If a title page was included under number 5 above, it is not 
necessary to include an additional title page under this section.
    ii. Information Sheet. A separate one-page information sheet 
listing each of the evaluation criteria referenced in this funding 
announcement, followed by the page numbers of all relevant material and 
documentation contained in the proposal that address or support the 
criteria. If the evaluation criteria are listed on the Table of 
Contents and specifically and individually addressed in narrative form, 
then it is not necessary to include an information sheet under this 
section.

[[Page 36352]]

    iii. Goals of the Project. The applicant must include the following 
statements in this section of the narrative to demonstrate that the 
Center is following these statutory requirements:
    1. A statement that substantiates that the Center will effectively 
serve rural areas in the United States;
    2. A statement that the primary objective of the Center will be to 
improve the economic condition of rural areas through cooperative 
development;
    3. A description of the contributions that the proposed activities 
are likely to make to the improvement of the economic conditions of the 
rural areas for which the Center will provide services. Expected 
economic impacts should be tied to tasks included in the work plan and 
budget; and
    4. A statement that the Center, in carrying out its activities, 
will seek, where appropriate, the advice, participation, expertise, and 
assistance of representatives of business, industry, educational 
institutions, the Federal government, and State and local governments.
    iv. Performance Measures. The Agency has established annual 
performance evaluation measures to evaluate the RCDG program. 
Applicants must provide estimates on the following performance 
evaluation measures.
     Number of groups who are not legal entities assisted.
     Number of businesses that are not cooperatives assisted.
     Number of cooperatives assisted.
     Number of businesses incorporated that are not 
cooperatives.
     Number of cooperatives incorporated.
     Total number of jobs created as a result of assistance 
(Note: where not relevant--housing, for example--the applicant should 
suggest a more relevant performance measure).
     Total number of jobs saved as a result of assistance 
(Note: where not appropriate--housing, for example--the applicant 
should suggest a more appropriate performance measure).
     Number of jobs created for the Center as a result of RCDG 
funding.
     Number of jobs saved for the Center as a result of RCDG 
funding.
    If selected for funding, the applicant will be required to report 
actual numbers for these performance elements on a semi-annual basis 
and in the final performance report. Additional information on post-
award requirements can be found in Section VI. Applicants must also 
suggest additional performance elements in the event the proposal 
receives grant funding. These additional criteria should be specific, 
measurable performance elements, but are not binding on USDA.
    v. Undertakings. The applicant must describe in the application how 
it will undertake to do each of the following:
    1. Take all practicable steps to develop continuing sources of 
financial support for the Center, particularly from sources in the 
private sectors;
    2. Make arrangements for the Center's activities to be monitored 
and evaluated; and
    3. Provide an accounting for the money received by the grantee in 
accordance with 7 CFR part 4284, subpart F.
    vi. Work Plan and Budget (should be presented under proposal 
evaluation criterion number 6, utilizing the specific requirements in 
section V.A.6).
    vii. Delivery of Technical Assistance and Other Services Delivery 
of technical assistance in rural areas to promote and assist the 
development of cooperatively and mutually-owned businesses should be 
described under proposal evaluation criterion number 2, utilizing the 
specific requirements under section V.A.2.
    viii. Qualifications of Personnel (should be presented under 
proposal evaluation criterion number 7, utilizing the specific 
requirements under section V.A.7.).
    ix. Local Support (should be described under proposal evaluation 
criterion number 8, utilizing the requirements in section V.A.8.).
    x. Future Support (should be described under proposal evaluation 
criterion number 9, utilizing the specific requirements under V.A.9.).
    xi. Proposal Evaluation Criteria. Each of the evaluation criteria 
referenced in this funding announcement must be specifically and 
individually addressed in narrative form. Applications that do not 
address all of the proposal evaluation criteria will be considered 
ineligible. See Section V.A. for a description of the Proposal 
Evaluation Criteria.
    10. Certification of Judgment Owed to the United States. Applicants 
must certify that there are no current outstanding Federal judgments 
against them. No grant funds shall be used to pay a judgment obtained 
by the United States other than judgment in tax court. It is suggested 
that applicants use the following language for the certification. 
``[INSERT NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that the United States has not 
obtained an unsatisfied judgment against it and will not use grant 
funds to pay any judgments obtained by the United States.'' A separate 
signature is not required.
    11. Certification of Matching Funds. Applicants must certify that 
matching funds will be available at the same time grant funds are 
anticipated to be spent and that expenditures of matching funds are 
pro-rated, such that for every dollar of the total project cost, not 
less than the required amount of matching funds will have been expended 
prior to submitting the request for reimbursement. Please note that 
this certification is a separate requirement from the Verification of 
Matching Funds requirement. To satisfy the Certification requirement, 
applicants should include this statement for this section: ``[INSERT 
NAME OF APPLICANT] certifies that matching funds will be available at 
the same time grant funds are anticipated to be spent and that 
expenditures of matching funds shall be pro-rated, such that * * * and 
that matching funds will be spent in advance of grant funding, such 
that for every dollar of the total project cost, at least 25 cents (5 
cents for 1994 Institutions) of matching funds will have been expended 
prior to submitting the request for reimbursement.'' A separate 
signature is not required. In the case of fund advances, the applicant 
will certify that for every dollar of funds advanced, at least 25 cents 
(5 cents for 1994 Institutions) of matching funds will be expended.
    12. Verification of Matching Funds. Applicants must provide 
documentation of all proposed matching funds, both cash and in-kind. 
Matching funds must be used for eligible purposes and expenditures for 
this grant program. The documentation must be included in Appendix A of 
the application and will not count towards the 40-page limitation. 
Template letters for each type of matching funds are available at 
http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/verifymatchsample.doc.
    If matching funds are to be provided in cash, the following 
requirements must be met at the time of application. Additional 
documentation may be required if a grant is awarded.
    Applicant: The application must include a statement verifying (1) 
the amount of the cash and (2) the source of the cash. If the applicant 
is paying for goods and/or services as part of the matching funds 
contribution, the expenditure is considered a cash match, and should be 
verified as such.
    Third-party: The application must include a signed letter from the 
third party verifying (1) how much cash will be donated and (2) that it 
will be available corresponding to the proposed grant period or donated 
on a specific date within the grant period. Cash matching contributions 
from third-parties are to be used for Center operations and cannot be 
used to provide services which directly benefit

[[Page 36353]]

the third-party contributor. Contributors of cash matching 
contributions may not limit or direct how or where the Center may use 
the contributions.
    If matching funds are to be provided by an in-kind donation, the 
following requirements must be met.
    Applicant: The application must include a signed letter from the 
applicant or its authorized representative verifying (1) the nature of 
the goods and/or services to be donated and how they will be used, (2) 
when the goods and/or services will be donated (i.e., corresponding to 
the proposed grant period or to specific dates within the grant 
period), and (3) the value of the goods and/or services.
    Third-Party: The application must include a signed letter from the 
third party verifying (1) the nature of the goods and/or services to be 
donated and how they will be used, (2) when the goods and/or services 
will be donated (i.e., corresponding to the proposed grant period or to 
specific dates within the grant period when matching contributions will 
be made available), and (3) the value of the goods and/or services. It 
should be noted that non-profit or other organizations contributing the 
services of affiliated volunteers must follow the third-party 
verification requirement above, for each individual volunteer.
    Applicants should note the following:
     Only goods or services for which no expenditure is made 
can be considered in-kind.
     In-kind contributions that are over-valued will not be 
accepted. The valuation process for in-kind funds does not need to be 
included in the application, but the applicant must be able to 
demonstrate how the valuation was derived at the time of notification 
of tentative selection for the grant award, or the grant award may be 
withdrawn or the amount of the grant may be reduced. Matching funds 
donated outside the proposed time period of the grant will not be 
accepted.
     Examples of unacceptable matching funds are in-kind 
contributions from individuals, businesses, or cooperatives being 
assisted by the Center to benefit their own project; donations of fixed 
equipment and buildings; and costs related to the preparation of the 
RCDG application package.
    Expected program income may not be used to fulfill the matching 
funds requirement at the time of application. However, if there are 
contracts to provide services in place at the time of application, they 
may be treated as cash match. If program income is earned during the 
time period of the grant, it is subject to applicable requirements of 7 
CFR part 3015, subpart F and 7 CFR part 3019.24 and any provisions in 
the Grant Agreement.

D. Submission Dates and Times

    Application Deadline Date: August 9, 2010.
    Explanation of Deadlines: Paper applications must be postmarked by 
the deadline date (see Section IV.G for the address). Electronic 
applications must be received by http://www.grants.gov by the deadline 
date. If the application does not meet the deadline above, it will not 
be considered for funding. The applicant will be notified if the 
application does not meet the submission requirements. The applicant 
will also be notified by mail or by e-mail if the application is 
received on time.

E. Intergovernmental Review of Applications

    Executive Order (EO) 12372, Intergovernmental review of Federal 
programs, applies to this program. This EO requires that Federal 
agencies provide opportunities for consultation on proposed assistance 
with State and local governments. Many states have established a Single 
Point of Contact (SPOC) to facilitate this consultation. For a list of 
states that maintain an SPOC, please see the White House Web site: 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html. If an applicant's state 
has an SPOC, the applicant may submit a copy of the application 
directly for review. Any comments obtained through the SPOC must be 
provided to USDA Rural Development for consideration as part of the 
application. If the applicant's state has not established an SPOC, or 
the applicant does not want to submit a copy of the application, USDA 
Rural Development will submit the application to the SPOC or other 
appropriate agency or agencies.
    Applicants are also encouraged to contact the USDA Rural 
Development State Office for assistance and questions on this process. 
Contact information for USDA Rural Development State Offices can be 
viewed at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm.

F. Funding Restrictions

    Funding restrictions apply to both grant funds and matching funds. 
Grant funds may be used to pay up to 75 percent (95 percent where the 
grantee is a 1994 Institution) of the total project cost.
    1. Grant funds and matching funds may be used for, but are not 
limited to, providing the following to individuals, small businesses, 
cooperative and mutually-owned businesses and other similar entities in 
rural areas served by the Center (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)(5)and 7 U.S.C. 
1932(e)(4)(c)):
    i. Applied research, feasibility, environmental and other studies 
that may be useful for the purpose of cooperative development.
    ii. Collection, interpretation and dissemination of principles, 
facts, technical knowledge, or other information for the purpose of 
cooperative development.
    iii. Training and instruction for the purpose of cooperative 
development.
    iv. Loans and grants for the purpose of cooperative development in 
accordance with this notice and applicable regulations.
    v. Technical assistance, research services and advisory services 
for the purpose of cooperative development.
    vi. Programs providing for the coordination of services and sharing 
of information among the Centers (7 U.S.C. 1932(e)(4)(C)(vi).
    2. No funds made available under this solicitation shall be used 
for any of the following activities:
    i. To duplicate current services or replace or substitute support 
previously provided. If the current service is inadequate, however, 
grant funds may be used to expand the level of effort or services 
beyond that which is currently being provided;
    ii. To pay costs of preparing the application package for funding 
under this program;
    iii. To pay costs of the project incurred prior to the date of 
grant approval;
    iv. To fund political or lobbying activities;
    v. To pay for assistance to any private business enterprise that 
does not have at least 51 percent ownership by those who are either 
citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after 
being legally admitted for permanent residence;
    vi. To pay any judgment or debt owed to the United States;
    vii. To plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire, or construct a 
building or facility, including a processing facility;
    viii. To purchase, rent, or install fixed equipment, including 
laboratory equipment or processing machinery;
    ix. To pay for the repair of privately owned vehicles;
    x. To pay for the operating costs of any recipient entity.
    xi. To fund research and development;
    xii. To pay costs of the project where a conflict of interest 
exists; or
    xiii. To fund any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 or 
3019.

[[Page 36354]]

G. Other Submission Requirements

    A paper application for a grant must be submitted to Cooperative 
Programs, Attn: RCDG Program, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 
3250, Room 4016-South, Washington, DC 20250-3250. The phone number that 
should be used for courier delivery is (202) 720-8460. Electronically 
submitted applications must apply using the following Internet address: 
http://www.grants.gov. Applications may not be submitted by electronic 
mail, facsimile, or by hand-delivery. Each application submission must 
contain all required documents.

V. Application Review Information

A. Proposal Evaluation Criteria

    All eligible and complete applications will be evaluated based on 
the following criteria. Evaluators will base scores only on the 
information provided or cross-referenced by page number in each 
individual evaluation criterion. The maximum amount of points available 
is 100. Note: Newly established or proposed Centers that do not yet 
have a track record on which to evaluate the following criteria should 
refer to the expertise and track records of staff or consultants 
expected to perform tasks related to the respective criteria. Proposed 
or newly established Centers must be organized well-enough at time of 
application to address its capabilities for meeting these criteria.
    1. Administrative capabilities in support of Center activities. 
(maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will evaluate the application 
to determine whether the applicant demonstrates a proven track record 
in carrying out activities in support of development assistance to 
cooperatively and mutually owned businesses. At a minimum, applicants 
must discuss the following capabilities:
    i. Financial systems and audit controls;
    ii. Personnel and program administration performance measures;
    iii. Clear written rules of governance; and
    iv. Experience administering Federal grant funding, including but 
not limited to past RCDG's.
    Applicants that discuss the Center's administrative capabilities 
and track record, versus those of umbrella or supporting institutions, 
such as universities or parent organizations, will score higher.
    2. Technical assistance and other services. (maximum score of 15 
points) The Agency will evaluate the applicant's demonstrated expertise 
in providing technical assistance and accomplishing effective outcomes 
in rural areas to promote and assist the development of cooperatively 
and mutually-owned businesses. The applicant must discuss:
    i. Their potential for delivering effective technical assistance:
    ii. The types of assistance provided:
    iii. The expected effects of that assistance;
    iv. The sustainability of organizations receiving the assistance; 
and
    v. The transferability of its cooperative development strategies 
and focus to other areas of the U.S.
    Applicants that evidence effective delivery systems for cooperative 
development will score higher. Applicants that discuss the demonstrated 
expertise specific to the Center (as opposed to umbrella or supporting 
institutions such as universities or parent organizations) will score 
higher.
    3. Economic development. (maximum score of 15 points) The Agency 
will evaluate the applicant's demonstrated ability to facilitate:
    i. Establishment of cooperatives or mutually-owned businesses,
    ii. New cooperative approaches, and
    iii. Retention of businesses, generation of employment 
opportunities or other factors, as applicable, that will otherwise 
improve the economic conditions of rural areas.
    Applicants that provide statistics for historical and potential 
development and identify their role in economic development outcomes 
will score higher.
    4. Networking and regional focus. (maximum score of 10 points) The 
Agency will evaluate the applicant's demonstrated commitment to:
    i. Networking with other cooperative development centers, and other 
organizations involved in rural economic development efforts, as well 
as,
    ii. Developing multi-organization and multi-state approaches to 
addressing the economic development and cooperative needs of rural 
areas.
    New or proposed Centers are expected to be developed enough to 
address this criteria.
    5. Commitment. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will 
evaluate the applicant's commitment to providing technical assistance 
and other services to under-served and economically distressed areas in 
rural areas of the United States. Applicants that define and describe 
the underserved and economically distressed areas within their service 
area, provide statistics, and identify projects within or affecting 
these areas, as appropriate, will score higher.
    6. Work Plan/Budget. (maximum score of 10 points) The work plan 
will be reviewed for detailed actions and an accompanying timetable for 
implementing the proposal. Clear, logical, realistic and efficient 
plans will result in a higher score. Budgets will be reviewed for 
completeness and the quality of non-Federal funding commitments. 
Applicants must discuss:
    i. Specific tasks (whether it be by type of service or specific 
project) to be completed using grant and matching funds;
    ii. How customers will be identified;
    iii. Key personnel; and
    iv. The evaluation methods to be used to determine the success of 
specific tasks and overall objectives of Center operations.
    The budget must present a breakdown of the estimated costs 
associated with cooperative development activities as well as the 
operation of the Center and allocate these costs to each of the tasks 
to be undertaken. Matching funds as well as grant funds must be 
accounted for in the budget.
    7. Qualifications of those Performing the Tasks. (maximum score of 
10 points) The Agency will evaluate the application to determine if the 
personnel expected to perform key tasks have a track record of:
    i. Positive solutions for complex cooperative development and/or 
marketing problems; or
    ii. A successful record of conducting accurate feasibility studies, 
business plans, marketing analysis, or other activities relevant to 
applicant's success as determined by the tasks identified in the 
applicants work plan; and
    iii. Whether the personnel expected to perform the tasks are full/
part-time employees of the applicant or are contract personnel. 
Applicants that evidence commitment/availability of qualified personnel 
expected to perform the tasks will score higher.
    8. Local support. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will 
evaluate applications for previous and/or expected local support for 
the applicant, and plans for coordinating with other developmental 
organizations in the proposed service area or with state and local 
government institutions. Applicants that evidence strong support from 
potential beneficiaries and formal evidence of intent to coordinate 
with other developmental organizations will score higher. Support 
should be discussed directly within the response to this criterion. The 
applicant may also submit a maximum of 10 letters of support or intent 
to coordinate with the application. These letters should be included in 
Appendix B of the

[[Page 36355]]

application and will not count against the 40-page limit for the 
narrative.
    9. Future support. (maximum score of 10 points) The Agency will 
evaluate the applicant's vision for funding its operations in future 
years. Applicants should document:
    i. New and existing funding sources that support its goals;
    ii. Alternative funding sources that reduce reliance on Federal, 
State, and local grants; and
    iii. The use of in-house personnel for providing services versus 
contracting out for that expertise.
    Applications that evidence vision and likelihood of long-term 
sustainability with diversification of funding sources and building in-
house technical assistance capacity will score higher.
    10. Special Emphasis. (maximum score 10 points) The Agency will 
evaluate the applicant's demonstrated ability to implement projects 
designed to help cooperatives and mutually-owned businesses to create 
wealth in rural communities so that they are self-sustaining, 
repopulating, and thriving economically, using the following key USDA 
strategies:
    vi. Local and regional food systems as a strategy for encouraging 
production agriculture and related industries in new wealth creation;
    vii. Renewable energy generation, energy conservation, and/or 
climate change adaptation or mitigation as strategies for quality job 
creation;
    viii. Use of broadband and other critical infrastructure as a 
strategy to facilitate local entrepreneurship and expansion of market 
opportunities for small businesses;
    ix. Access to capital in rural areas as a strategy to ensure 
continuous business development and job creation/retention; and
    x. Innovative utilization of natural resources as a strategy to 
expand business opportunities.

B. Review and Selection Process

    The Agency will screen all of the proposals to determine whether 
the application is eligible and sufficiently responsive to the 
requirements set forth in this notice to allow for an informed review.
    The Agency will evaluate applications using a panel of qualified 
reviewers who will score the applications in accordance with the point 
allocation specified in this notice. Applications will be submitted to 
the Administrator in rank order, together with funding level 
recommendations.

C. Anticipated Announcement and Award Dates

    Award Date: The announcement of award selections is expected to 
occur on or about August 16, 2010.

VI. Award Administration Information

A. Award Notices

    Successful applicants will receive a notification of tentative 
selection for funding from USDA Rural Development. Applicants must 
comply with all applicable statutes and regulations before the grant 
award will be approved. Unsuccessful applicants will receive 
notification by mail, including appeal rights, as appropriate. 
Consolidated comments for reviewed applications will be made available.

B. Administrative and National Policy Requirements

    7 CFR parts 3015, 3019, and 4284 are applicable to this program. To 
view these regulations, please see the following Internet address: 
http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-search.html.
    The following additional requirements apply to grantees selected 
for this program:
     Grant Agreement.
     Letter of Conditions.
     Form RD 1940-1, ``Request for Obligation of Funds.''
     Form RD 1942-46, ``Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions.''
     Form AD-1047, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, 
Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters-Primary Covered 
Transactions.''
     Form AD-1048, ``Certification Regarding Debarment, 
Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion-Lower Tier Covered 
Transactions.''
     Form AD-1049, ``Certification Regarding Drug-Free 
Workplace Requirements (Grants).''
     Form RD 400-4, ``Assurance Agreement.''
     RD Instruction 1940-Q, Exhibit A-1, ``Certification for 
Contracts, Grants and Loans,'' including Standard Form (SF) LLL, 
``Disclosure of Lobbying Activities.''
    Compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
    This Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) has been reviwed in 
accordance with 7 CFR Part 1940, subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' 
Rural Development has determined that an Environmental Impact Statement 
is not required because the issuance of regulations and instructions, 
as well as amendments to them, describing administrative and financial 
procedures for processing, approving, and implementing the Agency's 
financial programs is categorically excluded in the Agency's NEPA 
regulation found at 7 CFR 1940.310(e) of Subpart G, Environmental 
Program. Thus, in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act 
(NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C 4321-4347), Rural Development has determined 
that this NOFA does not constitute a major Federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment. Furthermore, individual 
awards under this NOFA are hereby classified ad Categorical Exclusions 
according to 1940.310(e), the award of financial assistance for 
planning purposes, management and feasibility studies, or environmental 
impact analyses, which do not require any additional documentation.
    Additional information on these requirements can be found at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/rcdg.htm.
    Reporting Requirements: Grantees must provide USDA Rural 
Development with an original or electronic copy that includes all 
required signatures of the following reports. The reports should be 
submitted to the Agency contact listed on the Grant Agreement and 
Letter of Conditions. Failure to submit satisfactory reports on time 
may result in suspension or termination of the grant.
    1. Form SF-425. A ``Federal Financial Report,'' listing 
expenditures according to agreed upon budget categories, on a semi-
annual basis. Reporting periods end each March 31 and September 30. 
Reports are due 30 days after the reporting period ends.
    2. Semi-annual performance reports that compare accomplishments to 
the objectives stated in the proposal. Identify all tasks completed to 
date and provide documentation supporting the reported results. If the 
original schedule provided in the work plan is not being met, the 
report should discuss the problems or delays that may affect completion 
of the project. Objectives for the next reporting period should be 
listed. Compliance with any special conditions on the use of award 
funds should be discussed. The report should also include a summary at 
the end of the report with the following elements to assist in 
documenting the annual performance goals of the RCDG program for 
Congress.
     Number of groups who are not legal entities assisted.
     Number of businesses that are not cooperatives assisted.
     Number of cooperatives assisted.
     Number of businesses incorporated that are not 
cooperatives.

[[Page 36356]]

     Number of cooperatives incorporated.
     Total number of jobs created as a result of assistance 
(Note: where not relevant-housing, for example--the applicant should 
suggest a more relevant performance measure).
     Total number of jobs saved as a result of assistance 
(Note: where not relevant-housing, for example--the applicant should 
suggest a more relevant performance measure).
     Number of jobs created for the Center as a result of RCDG 
funding.
     Number of jobs saved for the Center as a result of RCDG 
funding.
     Additional performance measures identified by the grantee 
in Section 4(iv) of the application and accepted as binding in the 
Grant Agreement.
    Need something for any additional performance measures suggested by 
applicant and adopted by USDA.
    Reports are due as provided in paragraph 1 of this section. 
Supporting documentation must also be submitted for completed tasks. 
The supporting documentation for completed tasks includes, but is not 
limited to: Feasibility studies, marketing plans, business plans, 
publication quality success stories, applied research reports, copies 
of surveys conducted, articles of incorporation and bylaws and an 
accounting of how outreach, training, and other funds were expended.
    3. Final project performance reports. These reports shall include 
all of the requirements of the semi-annual performance reports and 
responses to the following:
    i. What have been the most challenging or unexpected aspects of 
this program?
    ii. What advice would the grantee give to other organizations 
planning a similar program? These should include strengths and 
limitations of the program. If the grantee had the opportunity, what 
would they have done differently?
    iii. If an innovative approach was used successfully, the grantee 
should describe their program in detail so that other organizations 
might consider replication in their areas.
    The final performance report is due within 90 days of the 
completion of the project.

VII. Agency Contacts

    For general questions about this announcement and for program 
technical assistance, applicants should contact their USDA Rural 
Development State Office at http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/rcdg/Contacts.htm. If an applicant is unable to contact their State Office, 
please contact a nearby State Office or the USDA Rural Development 
National Office at 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3250, Room. 
4016-South, Washington, DC 20250-3250, telephone: (202) 720-8460, e-
mail: cpgrants@wdc.usda.gov.

VIII. Nondiscrimination Statement

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination 
in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, 
national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital 
status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, 
genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or 
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance 
program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with 
disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program 
information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact 
USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD).
    To file a complaint of discrimination write to USDA, Director, 
Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (voice) or (202) 401-0216 (TDD). USDA 
is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

    Dated: June 17, 2010.
Judith A. Canales,
Administrator, Rural Business Cooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-15428 Filed 6-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P