Review and Approval of Projects, 36301-36306 [2010-15282]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published
in the Federal Register on June 8, 2010,
which, among other issues, solicits
comments on options to provide greater
access to air travel for persons with
peanut allergies. The June 8 document
also proposes action to strengthen the
rights of air travelers in the event of
oversales, flight cancellations and long
delays, and to ensure that passengers
have accurate and adequate information
to make informed decisions when
selecting flights.
DATES: Comments should be filed by
August 9, 2010. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may file comments
identified by the docket number DOT–
OST–2010–0140 by any of the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number DOT–
OST–2010–0140 or the Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your
comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received in any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.) You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78), or you may visit https://
DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daeleen Chesley, Senior Trial Attorney,
Office of the Assistant General Counsel
for Aviation Enforcement and
Proceedings, Department of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366–6792,
daeleen.chesley@dot.gov.
You may also contact Blane Workie,
Deputy Assistant General Counsel at the
same address, (202) 366–9342,
blane.workie@dot.gov. Arrangements to
receive this notice in an alternative
format may be made by contacting the
above named individuals.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pilot
Project on Open Government and the
Rulemaking Process: Pursuant to the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
published June 8, 2010, persons who
desire may provide input on this
rulemaking using the social networking
pilot project, Regulation Room,
established by DOT in partnership with
the Cornell eRulemaking Initiative
(CeRI). You may visit the Regulation
Room Web site, https://
www.regulationroom.org, to learn about
the NPRM and that process. For
questions about this project, please
contact Brett Jortland in the DOT Office
of General Counsel at 202.421.9216 or
brett.jortland@dot.gov.
Clarification of Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
On June 8, 2010, the Department
published an NPRM on Enhancing
Airline Passenger Protections (75 FR
32318), which, among other things,
solicits comment, without proposing
any specific rule text, on three options
that would provide greater access to air
travel for persons with peanut allergies.
The NPRM also sought comment on
whether it would be preferable to
maintain the current practice of not
prescribing carrier practices concerning
the serving of peanuts. (75 FR 32318,
32332)
We wish to clarify that, as alluded to
in the NPRM, we recognize that Section
346 of the Department of Transportation
and Related Agencies Appropriations
Act of 2000, Public Law 106–69—Oct. 9,
1999 states:
Hereafter, none of the funds made available
under this Act or any other Act, may be used
to implement, carry out, or enforce any
regulation issued under section 41705 of title
49, United States Code, including any
regulation contained in part382 of title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, or any other
provision of law (including any Act of
Congress, regulation, or Executive order or
any official guidance or correspondence
thereto), that requires or encourages an air
carrier (as that term is defined in section
40102 of title 49, United States Code) to, on
intrastate or interstate air transportation (as
those terms are defined in section 40102 of
title 49, United States Code)—(1) provide a
peanut-free buffer zone or any other related
peanut-restricted area; or (2) restrict the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36301
distribution of peanuts, until 90 days after
submission to the Congress and the Secretary
of a peer-reviewed scientific study that
determines that there are severe reactions by
passengers to peanuts as a result of contact
with very small airborne peanut particles of
the kind that passengers might encounter in
an aircraft.
We will comply with this requirement.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Parts 234, 250, and 259
Air carriers, Consumer protection,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 244
Air carriers, Consumer protection,
Tarmac delay data.
14 CFR Part 253
Air carriers, Consumer protection,
Contract of carriage.
14 CFR Part 399
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air carriers, Air rates and
fares, Air taxis, Consumer protection,
Small businesses.
Issued June 22, 2010, at Washington DC.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2010–15536 Filed 6–23–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN
COMMISSION
18 CFR Parts 806 and 808
Review and Approval of Projects
AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and public hearing.
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed rules that would amend the
project review regulations of the
Susquehanna River Basin Commission
(Commission) to: Include subsidiary
allocations for public water supply
systems under the scope of withdrawals
requiring review and approval; improve
notice procedures for all project
applications; clarify requirements for
grandfathered projects increasing their
withdrawals from an existing source or
initiating a new withdrawal; refine the
provisions governing transfer and reissuance of approvals; clarify the
Executive Director’s authority to grant,
deny, suspend, rescind, modify or
condition an Approval by Rule; include
decisional criteria for diversions into
the basin; amend administrative appeal
procedures to broaden available
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
36302
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
remedies and streamline the appeal
process; and make other minor
regulatory clarifications to the text of
the regulations.
DATES: Comments on these proposed
rules may be submitted to the
Commission on or before August 10,
2010. The Commission has scheduled
two public hearings on the proposed
rules, to be held July 27, 2010, in
Binghamton, New York, and July 29,
2010, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The
locations of the public hearings are
listed in the addresses section of this
notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed
to: Mr. Richard A. Cairo, Susquehanna
River Basin Commission, 1721 N. Front
Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102–2391, or
by e-mail to rcairo@srbc.net.
The public hearings will be held on
Tuesday, July 27, 2010, at 7 p.m., at the
Holiday Inn Arena, 2–8 Hawley Street,
Binghamton, New York 13901, and
Thursday, July 29, 2010, at 10 a.m., at
the Rachel Carson State Office Building,
400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA
17101. Those wishing to testify are
asked to notify the Commission in
advance, if possible, at the regular or
electronic addresses given below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
telephone: 717–238–0423, ext. 306; fax:
717–238–2436; e-mail: rcairo@srbc.net.
Also, for further information on the
proposed rulemaking, visit the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.srbc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose of
Amendments
When 18 CFR 806.4 was originally
published as final at 71 FR 78570,
December 29, 2006, updating and
expanding the range of projects subject
to Commission review and approval, a
pre-existing regulatory provision was
omitted inadvertently and this proposed
rulemaking attempts to correct that
omission. Specifically, 18 CFR
§ 806.4(a)(2) would be modified to
indicate that the taking or removal of
water by a public water supplier
indirectly through another public water
supply system or another water facility
(aka, a subsidiary allocation) constitutes
a withdrawal that is subject to review
and approval.
An amendment to 18 CFR
806.4(a)(2)(iv) will clarify that sponsors
of grandfathered surface or groundwater
withdrawal projects are required to
submit applications for review and
approval whenever the project will
increase its withdrawal from an existing
source, or initiate a withdrawal from a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
new source, or combination of sources.
This clarification memorialized existing
Commission policy under the current
rule.
An amendment to 18 CFR 806.4(c)
will provide that sponsors of certain
classes of projects undergoing a change
of ownership, and thus triggering review
and approval, would have 90 days from
the date of ownership transfer to submit
applications under the rule. The current
rule requires submission of the
application on or before the date of
ownership change. This amendment is
consistent with those recommended for
transfers of approval under 18 CFR
806.6, as discussed below.
The proposed amendments to 18 CFR
806.6 are intended to clarify that certain
approvals may be transferred or
conditionally transferred
administratively, rather than requiring
full Commission action on such transfer
requests. The existing phraseology
authorizing transfers or conditional
transfers of approval ‘‘without prior
Commission review and approval’’ was
misleading in that respect and is
proposed to be deleted, along with other
editorial changes intended to add more
clarification to this section.
The existing rule also requires certain
categories of approvals to initiate the
transfer of approval process with the
Commission on or before the date of
ownership transfer, and yet other
categories of approvals are allowed to
initiate transfer applications within 90
days of the date of ownership transfer.
The proposed language would
uniformly require all applications to be
submitted within 90 days of the date of
ownership transfer.
Another substantive change would
break out situations where project
sponsors with existing approvals
undergo a name change and seek to
have the approval changed to reflect the
new name. Rather than being
categorized as a transfer of approval,
which is triggered by a change in
ownership, a new subsection is added to
more appropriately provide for ‘‘reissuance’’ of such approvals to reflect
the name change of the existing project
sponsor.
An amendment is proposed to 18 CFR
806.7 to clarify that existing language
recognizing that agencies of the member
jurisdictions exercise ‘‘review authority’’
over projects also regulated by the
Commission is intended to mean and
should be stated as ‘‘review and
approval authority.’’
18 CFR 806.15 currently sets
notification requirements for project
sponsors applying for approvals issued
by the Commission under its standard
docketing procedures, and for Approval
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
by Rule (ABR) natural gas pad site
approvals issued under 18 CFR
806.22(f). However, ABRs issued under
18 CFR 806.22(e) are subject to certain
notification standards in that section
which are inconsistent with the general
notification requirements contained in
18 CFR 806.15. Furthermore, there are
also requirements contained in 18 CFR
806.22(f) that are redundant with those
contained in 18 CFR 806.15 and are
therefore unnecessary.
The proposed amendments to this
section (and complementary ones
proposed for 18 CFR 806.22(e) and (f))
are intended to result in all notification
requirements for all project approvals
being consolidated into this section,
including all those having general
applicability and those that might be
specific to certain classes of project
applications. With regard to specific
requirements for certain classes, the
proposed rulemaking would establish
the following revised notification
standards:
› For groundwater withdrawal
applications, rather than just notifying
landowners that are contiguous to the
project site, notice would have to be
given to all owners currently listed on
the tax assessment rolls that are within
one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location.
› For surface water withdrawal
applications, rather than just notifying
landowners that are contiguous to the
project site, notice would have to be
given to all owners currently listed on
the tax assessment rolls that are within
one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location and whose
property borders the stream, river, lake
or water body from which the
withdrawal is proposed to be taken.
› For consumptive use applications
involving a withdrawal, the applicable
groundwater or surface water
withdrawal requirements noted above
would apply. For consumptive use
applications that do not involve a
withdrawal (such as those supplied by
a public water supplier), newspaper
notice in the area of the project would
be required.
› For out-of-basin diversion
applications, there would be additional
newspaper notice required in the area
outside the basin where the proposed
use of the diverted water would occur.
• For into-basin diversion
applications, there would be additional
newspaper notice required in the area
outside the basin where the withdrawal
of water proposed for diversion is
located.
• For applications to use public water
supply a source for water in natural gas
development operations, newspaper
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
notice in the area served by the public
water supply system would be required.
• For applications to use wastewater
discharge as a source for water in
natural gas development operations,
newspaper notice would be required in
all areas where such discharge water
would be used for such development
purposes.
In addition to the foregoing, the
proposed amendments establish
uniform proof of notification standards
and would require project sponsors to
maintain all proofs of notice for the
duration of the approvals related to such
notices.
The Approval by Rule (ABR)
provisions contained in 18 CFR 806.22
would be modified to clarify that the
Executive Director has the authority not
only to grant or deny such ABRs, but to
‘‘suspend, rescind, modify or condition’’
such approvals as well. Such authority
was implied in the existing language
and the existing policy of the
Commission supports that
interpretation. The proposed
amendment is intended to provide that
clarification. A second amendment
would require all project sponsors
seeking an ABR to satisfy the applicable
notice requirements proposed for 18
CFR 806.15, and noted above.
With regard to ABRs issued under 18
CFR 806.22(f) for natural gas
development projects, language is
proposed for subsection (f)(12)(i) to
clarify that project sponsors registering
approved water withdrawals must
record daily and report quarterly the
quantity of water obtained from all
registered sources. Additionally,
subsection (f)(12)(ii) would be modified
to delete ‘‘other reclaimed waters’’ as
potential sources, thus limiting the class
of approvable sources under this
provision to public water supply
systems and wastewater discharges.
The proposed amendments to 18 CFR
806.24 would add certain decisional
criteria for consideration by the
Commission while acting on
applications for into-basin diversions,
similar to what now is provided for
consideration in acting on out-of-basin
diversion applications. Specifically, the
proffered language would add criteria
related to the potential introduction of
invasive or exotic species that may be
injurious to the water resources of the
basin, and the extent to which the
proposed diversion would satisfy all
other applicable standards contained in
subpart C of Part 806.
18 CFR 806.35 currently indicates that
project sponsors have an affirmative
duty to pay fees established by the
Commission. The proposed amendatory
language would expand this to indicate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
that the purpose of such fees is to cover
the Commission’s costs of administering
its regulatory program and any
extraordinary costs associated with
specific projects.
18 CFR 808.2 currently establishes a
procedure for the filing of
administrative appeals to actions or
decisions rendered by the Commission
or the Executive Director. The broad
terms of the current regulation have
resulted in some abuse of the appeal
process, including attempts to file
appeals of determinations on requests
for administrative appeals, appeals of
stay request determinations and other
extraneous or repetitive pleadings that
frustrate the original purpose of
providing the appropriate
administrative review envisioned when
this rule became effective in 2007. In
short, this abuse has been enabled by
the fact that there is no limitation on the
type of Commission actions that are
eligible for appeal under this section,
leaving any action of the Commission
subject to this process.
Additionally, the current regulation
does not contain provisions for handling
appeals from administrative level
‘‘Access to Records’’ determinations. The
new Access to Records Policy adopted
by the Commission in 2009 (Policy No.
2009–02) provides for appeal of such
decisions to the Commission. Finally,
the current regulation does not specify
the authority of an appointed hearing
officer to admit or bar intervener parties
based on the principle of standing.
The proposed revisions to 18 CFR
808.2 generally limit appeals to a single
filing, and only to project
determinations or records
determinations. Executive Director
determinations on requests for stay
would not be appealable to the
Commission and would stand until the
time of the Commission proceeding on
the appeal (unless overturned by a court
of competent jurisdiction). Lastly, the
appointed hearing officer is given
authority to admit or bar intervener
parties based on the legal principle of
standing.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Parts 806 and
808
Administrative practice and
procedure, Water resources.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, the Susquehanna River
Basin Commission proposes to amend
18 CFR Parts 806 and 808 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36303
PART 806—REVIEW AND APPROVAL
OF PROJECTS
Subpart C—Standards for Review and
Approval
1. The authority citation for Part 806
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5(5), 3.8, 3.10 and
15.2, Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
2. In § 806.4, revise paragraphs (a)(2)
introductory text, (a)(2)(iv), and (c) to
read as follows:
§ 806.4 Projects requiring review and
approval.
(a) * * *
(2) Withdrawals. Any project
described below shall require an
application to be submitted in
accordance with § 806.13, and shall be
subject to the standards set forth in
§ 806.23. Hydroelectric projects, except
to the extent that such projects involve
a withdrawal, shall be exempt from the
requirements of this section regarding
withdrawals; provided, however, that
nothing in this paragraph shall be
construed as exempting hydroelectric
projects from review and approval
under any other category of project
requiring review and approval as set
forth in this section, § 806.5, or 18 CFR
part 801. The taking or removal of water
by a public water supplier indirectly
through another public water supply
system or another water user’s facilities
shall constitute a withdrawal hereunder.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) With respect to groundwater
projects in existence prior to July 13,
1978, and surface water projects in
existence prior to November 11, 1995,
any project that will increase its
withdrawal from any source, or initiate
a withdrawal from a new source, or
combination of sources, by a
consecutive 30-day average of 100,000
gpd or more, above that maximum
consecutive 30-day amount which the
project was withdrawing prior to the
said applicable date.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Any project that did not require
Commission approval prior to January 1,
2007, and not otherwise exempt from
the requirements of paragraph (a)(1)(iv),
(a)(2)(v) or (a)(3)(iv) pursuant to
paragraph (b) of this section, may be
undertaken by a new project sponsor
upon a change of ownership pending
action by the Commission on an
application submitted by such project
sponsor requesting review and approval
of the project, provided such
application is submitted to the
Commission in accordance with this
part within 90 days of the date change
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
36304
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
of ownership occurs and the project
features related to the source,
withdrawal, diversion or consumptive
use of water, or the nature or quantity
of water withdrawal, diversion or
consumptive use associated with the
project do not change pending review of
the application. For purposes of this
paragraph, changes in the quantity of
water withdrawal, diversion or
consumptive use shall only relate to
increases in quantity in excess of the
quantity withdrawn, diverted or
consumptively used prior to the change
of ownership.
3. In § 806.6, revise the section
heading, paragraphs (a), (b) introductory
text, (b)(1), (c) introductory text and (d)
introductory text, and add paragraph (e)
to read as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 806.6 Transfer and re-issuance of
approvals.
(a) An existing Commission project
approval may be transferred or
conditionally transferred to a new
project sponsor upon a change of
ownership of the project, subject to the
provisions of paragraphs (b), (c) and (d)
of this section, and the new project
sponsor may only operate the project in
accordance with and subject to the
terms and conditions of the existing
approval pending approval of the
transfer, provided the new project
sponsor notifies the Commission within
90 days from the date of the change of
ownership, which notice shall be on a
form and in a manner prescribed by the
Commission and under which the new
project sponsor certifies its intention to
comply with all terms and conditions of
the transferred approval and assume all
other associated obligations.
(b) An existing Commission project
approval for any of the following
categories of projects may be
conditionally transferred, subject to
administrative approval by the
Executive Director, upon a change of
ownership and the new project sponsor
may only operate such project in
accordance with and subject to the
terms and conditions of the transferred
approval:
(1) A project undergoing a change of
ownership as a result of a corporate
reorganization where the project
property is transferred to a corporation
by one or more corporations solely in
exchange for stock or securities of the
transferee corporation, provided that
immediately after the exchange the
transferor corporation(s) own 80 percent
of the voting stock and 80 percent of all
other stock of the transferee corporation.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An existing Commission approval
of a project that satisfies the following
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
conditions may be conditionally
transferred and the project sponsor may
only operate such project in accordance
with and subject to the terms and
conditions of the conditionally
transferred approval, pending action by
the Commission on the application
submitted in accordance with paragraph
(c)(3) of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) An existing Commission project
approval for any project not satisfying
the requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c)
of this section may be conditionally
transferred and the project sponsor may
only operate such project in accordance
with and subject to the terms and
conditions of the conditionally
transferred approval, pending action by
the Commission on an application the
project sponsor shall submit to the
Commission, provided that:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An existing Commission project
approval may be re-issued by the
Executive Director at the request of a
project sponsor undergoing a change of
name, provided such change does not
affect ownership or control of the
project or project sponsor. The project
sponsor may only continue to operate
the project under the terms and
conditions of the existing approval
pending approval of its request for reissuance, provided it submits its request
to the Commission within 90 days from
the date of the change, which notice
shall be on a form and in a manner
prescribed by the Commission,
accompanied by the appropriate fee
established therefore by the
Commission.
4. In § 806.7, revise paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
§ 806.7 Concurrent project review by
member jurisdictions.
(a) The Commission recognizes that
agencies of the member jurisdictions
will exercise their review and approval
authority and evaluate many proposed
projects in the basin. The Commission
will adopt procedures to assure
compatibility between jurisdictional
review and Commission review.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Revise § 806.15 to read as follows:
§ 806.15
Notice of application.
(a) The project sponsor shall, no later
than 10 days after submission of an
application to the Commission, notify
the appropriate agency of the member
State, each municipality in which the
project is located, and the county
planning agency of each county in
which the project is located, that an
application has been submitted to the
Commission. The project sponsor shall
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
also publish at least once in a
newspaper of general circulation serving
the area in which the project is located,
a notice of the submission of the
application no later than 10 days after
the date of submission. The project
sponsor shall also meet any of the notice
requirements set forth in paragraphs (b)
through (e) of this section, if applicable.
All notices required under this section
shall contain a description of the
project, its purpose, the requested
quantity of water to be withdrawn
obtained from for sources other than
withdrawals or consumptively used,
and the address, electronic mail
address, and phone number of the
project sponsor and the Commission.
(b) For withdrawal applications
submitted pursuant to § 806.4(a)(2), the
project sponsor shall also provide the
notice required under paragraph (a) of
this section no later than 10 days after
the date of its submission to each
property owner listed on the tax
assessment rolls of the county in which
such property is located and indentified
as follows:
(1) For groundwater withdrawal
applications, the owner of any property
that is located within one-half mile of
the proposed withdrawal location.
(2) For surface water withdrawal
applications, the owner of any property
that is riparian or littoral to the body of
water from which the proposed
withdrawal will be taken and is within
one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location.
(c) For projects involving a diversion
of water out of the basin, the project
sponsor shall also publish a notice of
the submission of its application, within
10 days thereof, at least once in a
newspaper of general circulation serving
the area outside the basin where the
project proposing to use the diverted
water is located. For projects involving
a diversion of water into the basin, the
project sponsor shall also publish a
notice of the submission of its
application, within 10 days thereof, at
least once in a newspaper of general
circulation serving the area outside the
basin where the withdrawal of water
proposed for diversion is located.
(d) For applications submitted under
§ 806.22(f)(12)(ii) to use a public water
supply source, the newspaper notice
requirement contained in paragraph (a)
of this section shall be satisfied by
publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in the area served by the
public water supply.
(e) For applications submitted under
§ 806.22(f)(12)(ii) to use a wastewater
discharge source, the newspaper notice
requirement contained in paragraph (a)
of this section shall be satisfied by
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
publication in a newspaper of general
circulation in each area within which
the water obtained from such source
will be used for natural gas
development.
(f) The project sponsor shall provide
the Commission with a copy of the
United States Postal Service return
receipt for the notifications to agencies
of member States, municipalities and
county planning agencies required
under paragraph (a) of this section. The
project sponsor shall also provide
certification on a form provided by the
Commission that it has published the
newspaper notice(s) required by this
section and made the landowner
notifications as required under
paragraph (b) of this section, if
applicable. Until these items are
provided to the Commission, processing
of the application will not proceed. The
project sponsor shall maintain all proofs
of notice required hereunder for the
duration of the approval related to such
notices.
6. In § 806.22, revise paragraphs
(e)(1)(i) introductory text, (e)(1)(i)
(e)(1)(ii), (e)(6), (f)(3), (f)(9), and (f)(12)(i)
and (f)(12)(ii) to read as follows:
§ 806.22 Standards for consumptive uses
of water.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Except with respect to projects
involving natural gas well development
subject to the provisions of paragraph (f)
of this section, any project whose sole
source of water for consumptive use is
a public water supply system, may be
approved by the Executive Director
under this paragraph (e) in accordance
with the following, unless the Executive
Director determines that the project
cannot be adequately regulated under
this approval by rule:
(i) Notification of Intent: No fewer
than 90 days prior to the construction or
implementation of a project or increase
above a previously approved quantity of
consumptive use, the project sponsor
shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) on
forms prescribed by the Commission,
and the applicable application fee, along
with any required attachments.
(ii) Within 10 days after submittal of
an NOI under paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this
section, the project sponsor shall satisfy
the notice requirements set forth in
§ 806.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(6) The Executive Director may grant,
deny, suspend, rescind, modify or
condition an approval to operate under
this approval by rule and will notify the
project sponsor of such determination,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
including the quantity of consumptive
use approved.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) Within 10 days after submittal of
an NOI under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section, the project sponsor shall satisfy
the notice requirements set forth in
§ 806.15.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) The Executive Director may grant,
deny, suspend, rescind, modify or
condition an approval to operate under
this approval by rule and will notify the
project sponsor of such determination,
including the sources and quantity of
consumptive use approved. The
issuance of any approval hereunder
shall not be construed to waive or
exempt the project sponsor from
obtaining Commission approval for any
water withdrawals or diversions subject
to review pursuant to § 806.4 (a).
*
*
*
*
*
(12) The following additional sources
of water may be utilized by a project
sponsor in conjunction with an
approval by rule issued pursuant to
paragraph (f)(9) of this section:
(i) Water withdrawals or diversions
approved by the Commission pursuant
to § 806.4 (a) and issued to persons
other than the project sponsor, provided
any such source is approved for use in
natural gas well development, the
project sponsor has an agreement for its
use, and at least 10 days prior to use, the
project sponsor registers such source
with the Commission on a form and in
a manner as prescribed by the
Commission, and provides a copy of
same to the appropriate agency of the
member State. Any approval issued
hereunder shall be further subject to any
approval or authorization required by
the member State to utilize such
source(s). The project sponsor shall
record on a daily basis, and report
quarterly on a form and in a manner
prescribed by the Commission, the
quantity of water obtained from any
source registered hereunder.
(ii) Sources of water other than those
subject to paragraph (f)(12)(i) of this
section, including public water supply
or wastewater discharge, provided such
sources are first approved by the
Executive Director pursuant to this
section. Any request to utilize such
source(s) shall be submitted on a form
and in a manner as prescribed by the
Commission, shall satisfy the notice
requirements set forth in § 806.15, and
shall be subject to review pursuant to
the standards set forth in subpart C of
this part. Any approval issued
hereunder shall be further subject to any
approval or authorization required by
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36305
the member State to utilize such
source(s).
7. In § 806.24, add paragraph (c)(2), to
read as follows:
§ 806.24
Standards for diversions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) In deciding whether to approve a
proposed diversion into the basin, the
Commission shall also consider and the
project sponsor shall provide
information related to the following
factors:
(i) Any adverse effects and cumulative
adverse effects the project may have on
the Susquehanna River Basin, or any
portion thereof, as a result of the
introduction or potential introduction of
invasive or exotic species that may be
injurious to the water resources of the
basin.
(ii) The extent to which the proposed
diversion satisfies all other applicable
standards set forth in subpart C of this
part.
8. Revise § 806.35 to read as follows:
§ 806.35
Fees.
Project sponsors shall have an
affirmative duty to pay such fees as
established by the Commission to cover
its costs of administering the regulatory
program established by this part,
including any extraordinary costs
associated with specific projects.
PART 808—HEARINGS AND
ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
Subpart A—Conduct of Hearings
10. The authority citation for Part 808
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5(5), 3.8, 3.10 and
15.2, Pub. L. 91–575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
11. In § 808.2, revise paragraphs (a),
(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) to read
as follows:
§ 808.2
Administrative appeals.
(a) A project sponsor or other person
aggrieved by a final action or decision
of the Commission or Executive Director
on a project application or a records
access determination made pursuant to
Commission policy may file a written
appeal requesting a hearing. Except with
respect to project approvals or denials,
such appeal shall be filed with the
Commission within 30 days of the
action or decision. In the case of a
project approval or denial, such appeal
shall be filed by a project sponsor
within 30 days of receipt of actual
notice, and by all others within 30 days
of publication of notice of the action
taken on the project in the Federal
Register. In the case of records access
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
36306
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules
determinations, such appeal shall be
filed with the Commission within 30
days of receipt of actual notice of the
determination.
(b) The appeal shall identify the
specific action or decision for which a
hearing is requested, the date of the
action or decision, the interest of the
person requesting the hearing in the
subject matter of the appeal, and a
statement setting forth the basis for
objecting to or seeking review of the
action or decision. Appeals omitting any
of these elements will be considered
incomplete and not considered by the
Commission.
(c) Any request not filed on or before
the applicable deadline established in
paragraph (a) of this section hereof will
be deemed untimely and such request
for a hearing shall be considered denied
unless the Commission otherwise
authorizes it nunc pro tunc. Receipt of
requests for hearings, pursuant to this
section, whether timely filed or not,
shall be submitted by the Executive
Director to the commissioners for their
information.
(d) Petitioners shall be limited to a
single filing that shall set forth all
matters and arguments in support
thereof, including any ancillary motions
or requests for relief. Issues not raised
in this single filing shall be considered
waived and filings may only be
amended or supplemented upon leave
of the Executive Director. Where the
petitioner is appealing a final
determination on a project application
and is not the project sponsor, the
petitioner shall serve a copy of the
appeal upon the project sponsor within
five days of its filing.
(e) If granted, hearings shall be held
not less than 20 days after notice
appears in the Federal Register.
Hearings may be conducted by one or
more members of the Commission, by
the Executive Director, or by such other
hearing officer as the Commission may
designate.
(1) The petitioner may also request a
stay of the action or decision giving rise
to the appeal pending final disposition
of the appeal, which stay may be
granted or denied by the Executive
Director after consultation with the
Commission chair and the member from
the affected member State. The decision
of the Executive Director on the request
for stay shall not be appealable to the
Commission under this section and
shall remain in full force and effect until
the Commission acts on the appeal.
(2) In addition to the contents of the
request itself, the Executive Director, in
granting or denying the request for stay,
will consider the following factors:
(i) Irreparable harm to the petitioner.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
(ii) The likelihood that the petitioner
will prevail.
(f) The Commission shall grant the
hearing request pursuant to this section
if it determines that an adequate record
with regard to the action or decision is
not available, the case involves a
determination by the Executive Director
or staff which requires further action by
the Commission, or that the
Commission has found that an
administrative review is necessary or
desirable. If the Commission denies any
request for a hearing, the party seeking
such hearing shall be limited to such
remedies as may be provided by the
compact or other applicable law or court
rule.
(g) If a hearing is granted, the
Commission shall refer the matter for
hearing to be held in accordance with
§ 808.3, and appoint a hearing officer.
(h) Intervention. (1) A request for
intervention may be filed with the
Commission by persons other than the
petitioner within 20 days of the
publication of a notice of the granting of
such hearing in the Federal Register.
The request for intervention shall state
the interest of the person filing such
notice, and the specific grounds of
objection to the action or decision or
other grounds for appearance. The
hearing officer(s) shall determine
whether the person requesting
intervention has standing in the matter
that would justify their admission as an
intervener to the proceedings in
accordance with Federal case law.
(2) Interveners shall have the right to
be represented by counsel, to present
evidence and to examine and crossexamine witnesses.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: June 15, 2010.
Thomas W. Beauduy,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–15282 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1310
[Docket No. DEA–228P]
RIN 1117–AA66
Chemical Mixtures Containing Listed
Forms of Phosphorus and Change in
Application Process
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUMMARY: The DEA is proposing
regulations which establish those
chemical mixtures containing red
phosphorus, white phosphorus (also
known as yellow phosphorus), or
hypophosphorous acid and its salts
(hereinafter ‘‘regulated phosphorus’’)
that shall automatically qualify for
exemption from the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA) regulatory
controls. DEA is proposing that
chemical mixtures containing red
phosphorus in a concentration of 80
percent or less and mixtures containing
hypophosphorous acid and its salts
(hypophosphite salts) in a concentration
of 30 percent and less, shall qualify for
automatic exemption. DEA is not
proposing automatic exemption for
chemical mixtures containing white
phosphorus. Unless otherwise
exempted, all material containing white
phosphorus shall become subject to
CSA chemical regulatory controls
regardless of concentration.
DEA recognizes that concentration
criteria alone cannot identify all
mixtures that warrant exemption,
therefore, an application process has
been implemented which allows
manufacturers to apply for exemption
from CSA regulatory controls for those
phosphorus chemical mixtures that do
not qualify for automatic exemption.
This rulemaking also proposes changes
to the application review and
notification process.
While preparing this rulemaking, DEA
became aware that references to section
1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971) were
inadvertently omitted from 21 CFR
1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i). Therefore,
DEA is proposing that this rulemaking
amend these sections by adding this
citation. This insertion is a clarification
and does not alter the current treatment
of exempt chemical mixtures under the
CSA.
DATES: Written comments must be
postmarked, and electronic comments
must be sent, on or before August 24,
2010.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–228P’’ on all written and
electronic correspondence. Written
comments being sent via regular mail
should be sent to the Deputy Assistant
Administrator, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, VA 22152. Attention: DEA
Federal Register Representative/ODL.
Written comments sent via express mail
should be sent to DEA Headquarters,
Attention: DEA Federal Register
Representative/ODL, 8701 Morrissette
Drive, Springfield, VA 22152.
E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM
25JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36301-36306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15282]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION
18 CFR Parts 806 and 808
Review and Approval of Projects
AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed rules that would amend the
project review regulations of the Susquehanna River Basin Commission
(Commission) to: Include subsidiary allocations for public water supply
systems under the scope of withdrawals requiring review and approval;
improve notice procedures for all project applications; clarify
requirements for grandfathered projects increasing their withdrawals
from an existing source or initiating a new withdrawal; refine the
provisions governing transfer and re-issuance of approvals; clarify the
Executive Director's authority to grant, deny, suspend, rescind, modify
or condition an Approval by Rule; include decisional criteria for
diversions into the basin; amend administrative appeal procedures to
broaden available
[[Page 36302]]
remedies and streamline the appeal process; and make other minor
regulatory clarifications to the text of the regulations.
DATES: Comments on these proposed rules may be submitted to the
Commission on or before August 10, 2010. The Commission has scheduled
two public hearings on the proposed rules, to be held July 27, 2010, in
Binghamton, New York, and July 29, 2010, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
The locations of the public hearings are listed in the addresses
section of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Mr. Richard A. Cairo, Susquehanna
River Basin Commission, 1721 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102-
2391, or by e-mail to rcairo@srbc.net.
The public hearings will be held on Tuesday, July 27, 2010, at 7
p.m., at the Holiday Inn Arena, 2-8 Hawley Street, Binghamton, New York
13901, and Thursday, July 29, 2010, at 10 a.m., at the Rachel Carson
State Office Building, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101. Those
wishing to testify are asked to notify the Commission in advance, if
possible, at the regular or electronic addresses given below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Cairo, General Counsel,
telephone: 717-238-0423, ext. 306; fax: 717-238-2436; e-mail:
rcairo@srbc.net. Also, for further information on the proposed
rulemaking, visit the Commission's Web site at https://www.srbc.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose of Amendments
When 18 CFR 806.4 was originally published as final at 71 FR 78570,
December 29, 2006, updating and expanding the range of projects subject
to Commission review and approval, a pre-existing regulatory provision
was omitted inadvertently and this proposed rulemaking attempts to
correct that omission. Specifically, 18 CFR Sec. 806.4(a)(2) would be
modified to indicate that the taking or removal of water by a public
water supplier indirectly through another public water supply system or
another water facility (aka, a subsidiary allocation) constitutes a
withdrawal that is subject to review and approval.
An amendment to 18 CFR 806.4(a)(2)(iv) will clarify that sponsors
of grandfathered surface or groundwater withdrawal projects are
required to submit applications for review and approval whenever the
project will increase its withdrawal from an existing source, or
initiate a withdrawal from a new source, or combination of sources.
This clarification memorialized existing Commission policy under the
current rule.
An amendment to 18 CFR 806.4(c) will provide that sponsors of
certain classes of projects undergoing a change of ownership, and thus
triggering review and approval, would have 90 days from the date of
ownership transfer to submit applications under the rule. The current
rule requires submission of the application on or before the date of
ownership change. This amendment is consistent with those recommended
for transfers of approval under 18 CFR 806.6, as discussed below.
The proposed amendments to 18 CFR 806.6 are intended to clarify
that certain approvals may be transferred or conditionally transferred
administratively, rather than requiring full Commission action on such
transfer requests. The existing phraseology authorizing transfers or
conditional transfers of approval ``without prior Commission review and
approval'' was misleading in that respect and is proposed to be
deleted, along with other editorial changes intended to add more
clarification to this section.
The existing rule also requires certain categories of approvals to
initiate the transfer of approval process with the Commission on or
before the date of ownership transfer, and yet other categories of
approvals are allowed to initiate transfer applications within 90 days
of the date of ownership transfer. The proposed language would
uniformly require all applications to be submitted within 90 days of
the date of ownership transfer.
Another substantive change would break out situations where project
sponsors with existing approvals undergo a name change and seek to have
the approval changed to reflect the new name. Rather than being
categorized as a transfer of approval, which is triggered by a change
in ownership, a new subsection is added to more appropriately provide
for ``re-issuance'' of such approvals to reflect the name change of the
existing project sponsor.
An amendment is proposed to 18 CFR 806.7 to clarify that existing
language recognizing that agencies of the member jurisdictions exercise
``review authority'' over projects also regulated by the Commission is
intended to mean and should be stated as ``review and approval
authority.''
18 CFR 806.15 currently sets notification requirements for project
sponsors applying for approvals issued by the Commission under its
standard docketing procedures, and for Approval by Rule (ABR) natural
gas pad site approvals issued under 18 CFR 806.22(f). However, ABRs
issued under 18 CFR 806.22(e) are subject to certain notification
standards in that section which are inconsistent with the general
notification requirements contained in 18 CFR 806.15. Furthermore,
there are also requirements contained in 18 CFR 806.22(f) that are
redundant with those contained in 18 CFR 806.15 and are therefore
unnecessary.
The proposed amendments to this section (and complementary ones
proposed for 18 CFR 806.22(e) and (f)) are intended to result in all
notification requirements for all project approvals being consolidated
into this section, including all those having general applicability and
those that might be specific to certain classes of project
applications. With regard to specific requirements for certain classes,
the proposed rulemaking would establish the following revised
notification standards:
[dec221] For groundwater withdrawal applications, rather than just
notifying landowners that are contiguous to the project site, notice
would have to be given to all owners currently listed on the tax
assessment rolls that are within one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location.
[dec221] For surface water withdrawal applications, rather than
just notifying landowners that are contiguous to the project site,
notice would have to be given to all owners currently listed on the tax
assessment rolls that are within one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location and whose property borders the stream, river, lake
or water body from which the withdrawal is proposed to be taken.
[dec221] For consumptive use applications involving a withdrawal,
the applicable groundwater or surface water withdrawal requirements
noted above would apply. For consumptive use applications that do not
involve a withdrawal (such as those supplied by a public water
supplier), newspaper notice in the area of the project would be
required.
[dec221] For out-of-basin diversion applications, there would be
additional newspaper notice required in the area outside the basin
where the proposed use of the diverted water would occur.
For into-basin diversion applications, there would be
additional newspaper notice required in the area outside the basin
where the withdrawal of water proposed for diversion is located.
For applications to use public water supply a source for
water in natural gas development operations, newspaper
[[Page 36303]]
notice in the area served by the public water supply system would be
required.
For applications to use wastewater discharge as a source
for water in natural gas development operations, newspaper notice would
be required in all areas where such discharge water would be used for
such development purposes.
In addition to the foregoing, the proposed amendments establish
uniform proof of notification standards and would require project
sponsors to maintain all proofs of notice for the duration of the
approvals related to such notices.
The Approval by Rule (ABR) provisions contained in 18 CFR 806.22
would be modified to clarify that the Executive Director has the
authority not only to grant or deny such ABRs, but to ``suspend,
rescind, modify or condition'' such approvals as well. Such authority
was implied in the existing language and the existing policy of the
Commission supports that interpretation. The proposed amendment is
intended to provide that clarification. A second amendment would
require all project sponsors seeking an ABR to satisfy the applicable
notice requirements proposed for 18 CFR 806.15, and noted above.
With regard to ABRs issued under 18 CFR 806.22(f) for natural gas
development projects, language is proposed for subsection (f)(12)(i) to
clarify that project sponsors registering approved water withdrawals
must record daily and report quarterly the quantity of water obtained
from all registered sources. Additionally, subsection (f)(12)(ii) would
be modified to delete ``other reclaimed waters'' as potential sources,
thus limiting the class of approvable sources under this provision to
public water supply systems and wastewater discharges.
The proposed amendments to 18 CFR 806.24 would add certain
decisional criteria for consideration by the Commission while acting on
applications for into-basin diversions, similar to what now is provided
for consideration in acting on out-of-basin diversion applications.
Specifically, the proffered language would add criteria related to the
potential introduction of invasive or exotic species that may be
injurious to the water resources of the basin, and the extent to which
the proposed diversion would satisfy all other applicable standards
contained in subpart C of Part 806.
18 CFR 806.35 currently indicates that project sponsors have an
affirmative duty to pay fees established by the Commission. The
proposed amendatory language would expand this to indicate that the
purpose of such fees is to cover the Commission's costs of
administering its regulatory program and any extraordinary costs
associated with specific projects.
18 CFR 808.2 currently establishes a procedure for the filing of
administrative appeals to actions or decisions rendered by the
Commission or the Executive Director. The broad terms of the current
regulation have resulted in some abuse of the appeal process, including
attempts to file appeals of determinations on requests for
administrative appeals, appeals of stay request determinations and
other extraneous or repetitive pleadings that frustrate the original
purpose of providing the appropriate administrative review envisioned
when this rule became effective in 2007. In short, this abuse has been
enabled by the fact that there is no limitation on the type of
Commission actions that are eligible for appeal under this section,
leaving any action of the Commission subject to this process.
Additionally, the current regulation does not contain provisions
for handling appeals from administrative level ``Access to Records''
determinations. The new Access to Records Policy adopted by the
Commission in 2009 (Policy No. 2009-02) provides for appeal of such
decisions to the Commission. Finally, the current regulation does not
specify the authority of an appointed hearing officer to admit or bar
intervener parties based on the principle of standing.
The proposed revisions to 18 CFR 808.2 generally limit appeals to a
single filing, and only to project determinations or records
determinations. Executive Director determinations on requests for stay
would not be appealable to the Commission and would stand until the
time of the Commission proceeding on the appeal (unless overturned by a
court of competent jurisdiction). Lastly, the appointed hearing officer
is given authority to admit or bar intervener parties based on the
legal principle of standing.
List of Subjects in 18 CFR Parts 806 and 808
Administrative practice and procedure, Water resources.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, the
Susquehanna River Basin Commission proposes to amend 18 CFR Parts 806
and 808 as follows:
PART 806--REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PROJECTS
Subpart C--Standards for Review and Approval
1. The authority citation for Part 806 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5(5), 3.8, 3.10 and 15.2, Pub. L. 91-
575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
2. In Sec. 806.4, revise paragraphs (a)(2) introductory text,
(a)(2)(iv), and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 806.4 Projects requiring review and approval.
(a) * * *
(2) Withdrawals. Any project described below shall require an
application to be submitted in accordance with Sec. 806.13, and shall
be subject to the standards set forth in Sec. 806.23. Hydroelectric
projects, except to the extent that such projects involve a withdrawal,
shall be exempt from the requirements of this section regarding
withdrawals; provided, however, that nothing in this paragraph shall be
construed as exempting hydroelectric projects from review and approval
under any other category of project requiring review and approval as
set forth in this section, Sec. 806.5, or 18 CFR part 801. The taking
or removal of water by a public water supplier indirectly through
another public water supply system or another water user's facilities
shall constitute a withdrawal hereunder.
* * * * *
(iv) With respect to groundwater projects in existence prior to
July 13, 1978, and surface water projects in existence prior to
November 11, 1995, any project that will increase its withdrawal from
any source, or initiate a withdrawal from a new source, or combination
of sources, by a consecutive 30-day average of 100,000 gpd or more,
above that maximum consecutive 30-day amount which the project was
withdrawing prior to the said applicable date.
* * * * *
(c) Any project that did not require Commission approval prior to
January 1, 2007, and not otherwise exempt from the requirements of
paragraph (a)(1)(iv), (a)(2)(v) or (a)(3)(iv) pursuant to paragraph (b)
of this section, may be undertaken by a new project sponsor upon a
change of ownership pending action by the Commission on an application
submitted by such project sponsor requesting review and approval of the
project, provided such application is submitted to the Commission in
accordance with this part within 90 days of the date change
[[Page 36304]]
of ownership occurs and the project features related to the source,
withdrawal, diversion or consumptive use of water, or the nature or
quantity of water withdrawal, diversion or consumptive use associated
with the project do not change pending review of the application. For
purposes of this paragraph, changes in the quantity of water
withdrawal, diversion or consumptive use shall only relate to increases
in quantity in excess of the quantity withdrawn, diverted or
consumptively used prior to the change of ownership.
3. In Sec. 806.6, revise the section heading, paragraphs (a), (b)
introductory text, (b)(1), (c) introductory text and (d) introductory
text, and add paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 806.6 Transfer and re-issuance of approvals.
(a) An existing Commission project approval may be transferred or
conditionally transferred to a new project sponsor upon a change of
ownership of the project, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (b),
(c) and (d) of this section, and the new project sponsor may only
operate the project in accordance with and subject to the terms and
conditions of the existing approval pending approval of the transfer,
provided the new project sponsor notifies the Commission within 90 days
from the date of the change of ownership, which notice shall be on a
form and in a manner prescribed by the Commission and under which the
new project sponsor certifies its intention to comply with all terms
and conditions of the transferred approval and assume all other
associated obligations.
(b) An existing Commission project approval for any of the
following categories of projects may be conditionally transferred,
subject to administrative approval by the Executive Director, upon a
change of ownership and the new project sponsor may only operate such
project in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of
the transferred approval:
(1) A project undergoing a change of ownership as a result of a
corporate reorganization where the project property is transferred to a
corporation by one or more corporations solely in exchange for stock or
securities of the transferee corporation, provided that immediately
after the exchange the transferor corporation(s) own 80 percent of the
voting stock and 80 percent of all other stock of the transferee
corporation.
* * * * *
(c) An existing Commission approval of a project that satisfies the
following conditions may be conditionally transferred and the project
sponsor may only operate such project in accordance with and subject to
the terms and conditions of the conditionally transferred approval,
pending action by the Commission on the application submitted in
accordance with paragraph (c)(3) of this section:
* * * * *
(d) An existing Commission project approval for any project not
satisfying the requirements of paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section
may be conditionally transferred and the project sponsor may only
operate such project in accordance with and subject to the terms and
conditions of the conditionally transferred approval, pending action by
the Commission on an application the project sponsor shall submit to
the Commission, provided that:
* * * * *
(e) An existing Commission project approval may be re-issued by the
Executive Director at the request of a project sponsor undergoing a
change of name, provided such change does not affect ownership or
control of the project or project sponsor. The project sponsor may only
continue to operate the project under the terms and conditions of the
existing approval pending approval of its request for re-issuance,
provided it submits its request to the Commission within 90 days from
the date of the change, which notice shall be on a form and in a manner
prescribed by the Commission, accompanied by the appropriate fee
established therefore by the Commission.
4. In Sec. 806.7, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 806.7 Concurrent project review by member jurisdictions.
(a) The Commission recognizes that agencies of the member
jurisdictions will exercise their review and approval authority and
evaluate many proposed projects in the basin. The Commission will adopt
procedures to assure compatibility between jurisdictional review and
Commission review.
* * * * *
5. Revise Sec. 806.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 806.15 Notice of application.
(a) The project sponsor shall, no later than 10 days after
submission of an application to the Commission, notify the appropriate
agency of the member State, each municipality in which the project is
located, and the county planning agency of each county in which the
project is located, that an application has been submitted to the
Commission. The project sponsor shall also publish at least once in a
newspaper of general circulation serving the area in which the project
is located, a notice of the submission of the application no later than
10 days after the date of submission. The project sponsor shall also
meet any of the notice requirements set forth in paragraphs (b) through
(e) of this section, if applicable. All notices required under this
section shall contain a description of the project, its purpose, the
requested quantity of water to be withdrawn obtained from for sources
other than withdrawals or consumptively used, and the address,
electronic mail address, and phone number of the project sponsor and
the Commission.
(b) For withdrawal applications submitted pursuant to Sec.
806.4(a)(2), the project sponsor shall also provide the notice required
under paragraph (a) of this section no later than 10 days after the
date of its submission to each property owner listed on the tax
assessment rolls of the county in which such property is located and
indentified as follows:
(1) For groundwater withdrawal applications, the owner of any
property that is located within one-half mile of the proposed
withdrawal location.
(2) For surface water withdrawal applications, the owner of any
property that is riparian or littoral to the body of water from which
the proposed withdrawal will be taken and is within one-half mile of
the proposed withdrawal location.
(c) For projects involving a diversion of water out of the basin,
the project sponsor shall also publish a notice of the submission of
its application, within 10 days thereof, at least once in a newspaper
of general circulation serving the area outside the basin where the
project proposing to use the diverted water is located. For projects
involving a diversion of water into the basin, the project sponsor
shall also publish a notice of the submission of its application,
within 10 days thereof, at least once in a newspaper of general
circulation serving the area outside the basin where the withdrawal of
water proposed for diversion is located.
(d) For applications submitted under Sec. 806.22(f)(12)(ii) to use
a public water supply source, the newspaper notice requirement
contained in paragraph (a) of this section shall be satisfied by
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the area served by
the public water supply.
(e) For applications submitted under Sec. 806.22(f)(12)(ii) to use
a wastewater discharge source, the newspaper notice requirement
contained in paragraph (a) of this section shall be satisfied by
[[Page 36305]]
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in each area within
which the water obtained from such source will be used for natural gas
development.
(f) The project sponsor shall provide the Commission with a copy of
the United States Postal Service return receipt for the notifications
to agencies of member States, municipalities and county planning
agencies required under paragraph (a) of this section. The project
sponsor shall also provide certification on a form provided by the
Commission that it has published the newspaper notice(s) required by
this section and made the landowner notifications as required under
paragraph (b) of this section, if applicable. Until these items are
provided to the Commission, processing of the application will not
proceed. The project sponsor shall maintain all proofs of notice
required hereunder for the duration of the approval related to such
notices.
6. In Sec. 806.22, revise paragraphs (e)(1)(i) introductory text,
(e)(1)(i) (e)(1)(ii), (e)(6), (f)(3), (f)(9), and (f)(12)(i) and
(f)(12)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 806.22 Standards for consumptive uses of water.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Except with respect to projects involving natural gas well
development subject to the provisions of paragraph (f) of this section,
any project whose sole source of water for consumptive use is a public
water supply system, may be approved by the Executive Director under
this paragraph (e) in accordance with the following, unless the
Executive Director determines that the project cannot be adequately
regulated under this approval by rule:
(i) Notification of Intent: No fewer than 90 days prior to the
construction or implementation of a project or increase above a
previously approved quantity of consumptive use, the project sponsor
shall submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) on forms prescribed by the
Commission, and the applicable application fee, along with any required
attachments.
(ii) Within 10 days after submittal of an NOI under paragraph
(e)(1)(i) of this section, the project sponsor shall satisfy the notice
requirements set forth in Sec. 806.15.
* * * * *
(6) The Executive Director may grant, deny, suspend, rescind,
modify or condition an approval to operate under this approval by rule
and will notify the project sponsor of such determination, including
the quantity of consumptive use approved.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) Within 10 days after submittal of an NOI under paragraph (f)(2)
of this section, the project sponsor shall satisfy the notice
requirements set forth in Sec. 806.15.
* * * * *
(9) The Executive Director may grant, deny, suspend, rescind,
modify or condition an approval to operate under this approval by rule
and will notify the project sponsor of such determination, including
the sources and quantity of consumptive use approved. The issuance of
any approval hereunder shall not be construed to waive or exempt the
project sponsor from obtaining Commission approval for any water
withdrawals or diversions subject to review pursuant to Sec. 806.4
(a).
* * * * *
(12) The following additional sources of water may be utilized by a
project sponsor in conjunction with an approval by rule issued pursuant
to paragraph (f)(9) of this section:
(i) Water withdrawals or diversions approved by the Commission
pursuant to Sec. 806.4 (a) and issued to persons other than the
project sponsor, provided any such source is approved for use in
natural gas well development, the project sponsor has an agreement for
its use, and at least 10 days prior to use, the project sponsor
registers such source with the Commission on a form and in a manner as
prescribed by the Commission, and provides a copy of same to the
appropriate agency of the member State. Any approval issued hereunder
shall be further subject to any approval or authorization required by
the member State to utilize such source(s). The project sponsor shall
record on a daily basis, and report quarterly on a form and in a manner
prescribed by the Commission, the quantity of water obtained from any
source registered hereunder.
(ii) Sources of water other than those subject to paragraph
(f)(12)(i) of this section, including public water supply or wastewater
discharge, provided such sources are first approved by the Executive
Director pursuant to this section. Any request to utilize such
source(s) shall be submitted on a form and in a manner as prescribed by
the Commission, shall satisfy the notice requirements set forth in
Sec. 806.15, and shall be subject to review pursuant to the standards
set forth in subpart C of this part. Any approval issued hereunder
shall be further subject to any approval or authorization required by
the member State to utilize such source(s).
7. In Sec. 806.24, add paragraph (c)(2), to read as follows:
Sec. 806.24 Standards for diversions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) In deciding whether to approve a proposed diversion into the
basin, the Commission shall also consider and the project sponsor shall
provide information related to the following factors:
(i) Any adverse effects and cumulative adverse effects the project
may have on the Susquehanna River Basin, or any portion thereof, as a
result of the introduction or potential introduction of invasive or
exotic species that may be injurious to the water resources of the
basin.
(ii) The extent to which the proposed diversion satisfies all other
applicable standards set forth in subpart C of this part.
8. Revise Sec. 806.35 to read as follows:
Sec. 806.35 Fees.
Project sponsors shall have an affirmative duty to pay such fees as
established by the Commission to cover its costs of administering the
regulatory program established by this part, including any
extraordinary costs associated with specific projects.
PART 808--HEARINGS AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS
Subpart A--Conduct of Hearings
10. The authority citation for Part 808 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 3.4, 3.5(5), 3.8, 3.10 and 15.2, Pub. L. 91-
575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq.
11. In Sec. 808.2, revise paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f),
(g), and (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 808.2 Administrative appeals.
(a) A project sponsor or other person aggrieved by a final action
or decision of the Commission or Executive Director on a project
application or a records access determination made pursuant to
Commission policy may file a written appeal requesting a hearing.
Except with respect to project approvals or denials, such appeal shall
be filed with the Commission within 30 days of the action or decision.
In the case of a project approval or denial, such appeal shall be filed
by a project sponsor within 30 days of receipt of actual notice, and by
all others within 30 days of publication of notice of the action taken
on the project in the Federal Register. In the case of records access
[[Page 36306]]
determinations, such appeal shall be filed with the Commission within
30 days of receipt of actual notice of the determination.
(b) The appeal shall identify the specific action or decision for
which a hearing is requested, the date of the action or decision, the
interest of the person requesting the hearing in the subject matter of
the appeal, and a statement setting forth the basis for objecting to or
seeking review of the action or decision. Appeals omitting any of these
elements will be considered incomplete and not considered by the
Commission.
(c) Any request not filed on or before the applicable deadline
established in paragraph (a) of this section hereof will be deemed
untimely and such request for a hearing shall be considered denied
unless the Commission otherwise authorizes it nunc pro tunc. Receipt of
requests for hearings, pursuant to this section, whether timely filed
or not, shall be submitted by the Executive Director to the
commissioners for their information.
(d) Petitioners shall be limited to a single filing that shall set
forth all matters and arguments in support thereof, including any
ancillary motions or requests for relief. Issues not raised in this
single filing shall be considered waived and filings may only be
amended or supplemented upon leave of the Executive Director. Where the
petitioner is appealing a final determination on a project application
and is not the project sponsor, the petitioner shall serve a copy of
the appeal upon the project sponsor within five days of its filing.
(e) If granted, hearings shall be held not less than 20 days after
notice appears in the Federal Register. Hearings may be conducted by
one or more members of the Commission, by the Executive Director, or by
such other hearing officer as the Commission may designate.
(1) The petitioner may also request a stay of the action or
decision giving rise to the appeal pending final disposition of the
appeal, which stay may be granted or denied by the Executive Director
after consultation with the Commission chair and the member from the
affected member State. The decision of the Executive Director on the
request for stay shall not be appealable to the Commission under this
section and shall remain in full force and effect until the Commission
acts on the appeal.
(2) In addition to the contents of the request itself, the
Executive Director, in granting or denying the request for stay, will
consider the following factors:
(i) Irreparable harm to the petitioner.
(ii) The likelihood that the petitioner will prevail.
(f) The Commission shall grant the hearing request pursuant to this
section if it determines that an adequate record with regard to the
action or decision is not available, the case involves a determination
by the Executive Director or staff which requires further action by the
Commission, or that the Commission has found that an administrative
review is necessary or desirable. If the Commission denies any request
for a hearing, the party seeking such hearing shall be limited to such
remedies as may be provided by the compact or other applicable law or
court rule.
(g) If a hearing is granted, the Commission shall refer the matter
for hearing to be held in accordance with Sec. 808.3, and appoint a
hearing officer.
(h) Intervention. (1) A request for intervention may be filed with
the Commission by persons other than the petitioner within 20 days of
the publication of a notice of the granting of such hearing in the
Federal Register. The request for intervention shall state the interest
of the person filing such notice, and the specific grounds of objection
to the action or decision or other grounds for appearance. The hearing
officer(s) shall determine whether the person requesting intervention
has standing in the matter that would justify their admission as an
intervener to the proceedings in accordance with Federal case law.
(2) Interveners shall have the right to be represented by counsel,
to present evidence and to examine and cross-examine witnesses.
* * * * *
Dated: June 15, 2010.
Thomas W. Beauduy,
Deputy Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-15282 Filed 6-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P