Chemical Mixtures Containing Listed Forms of Phosphorus and Change in Application Process, 36306-36313 [2010-15160]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS 36306 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules determinations, such appeal shall be filed with the Commission within 30 days of receipt of actual notice of the determination. (b) The appeal shall identify the specific action or decision for which a hearing is requested, the date of the action or decision, the interest of the person requesting the hearing in the subject matter of the appeal, and a statement setting forth the basis for objecting to or seeking review of the action or decision. Appeals omitting any of these elements will be considered incomplete and not considered by the Commission. (c) Any request not filed on or before the applicable deadline established in paragraph (a) of this section hereof will be deemed untimely and such request for a hearing shall be considered denied unless the Commission otherwise authorizes it nunc pro tunc. Receipt of requests for hearings, pursuant to this section, whether timely filed or not, shall be submitted by the Executive Director to the commissioners for their information. (d) Petitioners shall be limited to a single filing that shall set forth all matters and arguments in support thereof, including any ancillary motions or requests for relief. Issues not raised in this single filing shall be considered waived and filings may only be amended or supplemented upon leave of the Executive Director. Where the petitioner is appealing a final determination on a project application and is not the project sponsor, the petitioner shall serve a copy of the appeal upon the project sponsor within five days of its filing. (e) If granted, hearings shall be held not less than 20 days after notice appears in the Federal Register. Hearings may be conducted by one or more members of the Commission, by the Executive Director, or by such other hearing officer as the Commission may designate. (1) The petitioner may also request a stay of the action or decision giving rise to the appeal pending final disposition of the appeal, which stay may be granted or denied by the Executive Director after consultation with the Commission chair and the member from the affected member State. The decision of the Executive Director on the request for stay shall not be appealable to the Commission under this section and shall remain in full force and effect until the Commission acts on the appeal. (2) In addition to the contents of the request itself, the Executive Director, in granting or denying the request for stay, will consider the following factors: (i) Irreparable harm to the petitioner. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 (ii) The likelihood that the petitioner will prevail. (f) The Commission shall grant the hearing request pursuant to this section if it determines that an adequate record with regard to the action or decision is not available, the case involves a determination by the Executive Director or staff which requires further action by the Commission, or that the Commission has found that an administrative review is necessary or desirable. If the Commission denies any request for a hearing, the party seeking such hearing shall be limited to such remedies as may be provided by the compact or other applicable law or court rule. (g) If a hearing is granted, the Commission shall refer the matter for hearing to be held in accordance with § 808.3, and appoint a hearing officer. (h) Intervention. (1) A request for intervention may be filed with the Commission by persons other than the petitioner within 20 days of the publication of a notice of the granting of such hearing in the Federal Register. The request for intervention shall state the interest of the person filing such notice, and the specific grounds of objection to the action or decision or other grounds for appearance. The hearing officer(s) shall determine whether the person requesting intervention has standing in the matter that would justify their admission as an intervener to the proceedings in accordance with Federal case law. (2) Interveners shall have the right to be represented by counsel, to present evidence and to examine and crossexamine witnesses. * * * * * Dated: June 15, 2010. Thomas W. Beauduy, Deputy Director. [FR Doc. 2010–15282 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7040–01–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration 21 CFR Part 1310 [Docket No. DEA–228P] RIN 1117–AA66 Chemical Mixtures Containing Listed Forms of Phosphorus and Change in Application Process AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 SUMMARY: The DEA is proposing regulations which establish those chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus, white phosphorus (also known as yellow phosphorus), or hypophosphorous acid and its salts (hereinafter ‘‘regulated phosphorus’’) that shall automatically qualify for exemption from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) regulatory controls. DEA is proposing that chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus in a concentration of 80 percent or less and mixtures containing hypophosphorous acid and its salts (hypophosphite salts) in a concentration of 30 percent and less, shall qualify for automatic exemption. DEA is not proposing automatic exemption for chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. Unless otherwise exempted, all material containing white phosphorus shall become subject to CSA chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration. DEA recognizes that concentration criteria alone cannot identify all mixtures that warrant exemption, therefore, an application process has been implemented which allows manufacturers to apply for exemption from CSA regulatory controls for those phosphorus chemical mixtures that do not qualify for automatic exemption. This rulemaking also proposes changes to the application review and notification process. While preparing this rulemaking, DEA became aware that references to section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971) were inadvertently omitted from 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i). Therefore, DEA is proposing that this rulemaking amend these sections by adding this citation. This insertion is a clarification and does not alter the current treatment of exempt chemical mixtures under the CSA. DATES: Written comments must be postmarked, and electronic comments must be sent, on or before August 24, 2010. ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket No. DEA–228P’’ on all written and electronic correspondence. Written comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152. Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL. Written comments sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152. E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules Comments may be directly sent to DEA electronically by sending an electronic message to dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. Comments may also be sent electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov using the electronic comment form provided on that site. An electronic copy of this document is also available at the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. DEA will accept attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only. DEA will not accept any file format other than those specifically listed here. Posting of Public Comments: Please note that all comments received are considered part of the public record and made available for public inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov and in the Drug Enforcement Administration’s public docket. Such information includes personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter. If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it to be posted online or made available in the public docket, you must include the phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also place all the personal identifying information you do not want posted online or made available in the public docket in the first paragraph of your comment and identify what information you want redacted. If you want to submit confidential business information as part of your comment, but do not want it to be posted online or made available in the public docket, you must include the phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph of your comment. You must also prominently identify confidential business information to be redacted within the comment. If a comment has so much confidential business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or part of that comment may not be posted online or made available in the public docket. Personal identifying information and confidential business information identified and located as set forth above will be redacted and the comment, in redacted form, will be posted online and placed in the Drug Enforcement Administration’s public docket file. Please note that the Freedom of Information Act applies to all comments received. If you wish to inspect the agency’s public docket file in person by VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 appointment, please see the FOR paragraph. FURTHER INFORMATION FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152. Telephone: (202) 307–7183. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DEA’s Legal Authority DEA implements the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, often referred to as the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801–971), as amended. DEA publishes the implementing regulations for these statutes in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 1300 to end. These regulations are designed to ensure that there is a sufficient supply of controlled substances for legitimate medical purposes and to deter the diversion of controlled substances to illegal purposes. The CSA mandates that DEA establish a closed system of control for manufacturing, distributing, and dispensing controlled substances. Any person who manufactures, distributes, dispenses, imports, exports, or conducts research or chemical analysis with controlled substances must register with DEA (unless exempt) and comply with the applicable requirements for the activity. The CSA as amended also requires DEA to regulate the manufacture, distribution, importation, and exportation of chemicals that may be used to manufacture controlled substances. Listed chemicals that are classified as List I chemicals are important to the manufacture of controlled substances. Those classified as List II chemicals may be used to manufacture controlled substances. Purpose of This Rule In this rule, DEA is proposing concentration limits on chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus and/or hypophosphorous acid and its salts. If this rule is finalized as proposed, chemical mixtures containing either of these listed chemicals at or below the concentration limit would be automatically exempt from Controlled Substances Act (CSA) regulatory controls. Mixtures containing these chemicals above the concentration limit would be regulated as List I chemicals. DEA is not proposing automatic exemption for chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. Unless otherwise exempted, all material containing white phosphorus shall PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 36307 become subject to CSA chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration. DEA’s Requirement To Identify Exempt Chemical Mixtures The Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100– 690) (CDTA) created a definition for the term ‘‘chemical mixture’’ (21 U.S.C. 802(40)). The CDTA established 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi) to exclude ‘‘any transaction in a chemical mixture’’ from the definition of a ‘‘regulated transaction.’’ This exemption was exploited by those that traffic chemicals for illicit purposes in that it provided an unregulated source for obtaining listed chemicals for use in the illicit manufacture of controlled substances. In April 1994, the Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993 (DCDCA) corrected this situation by subjecting such chemical mixtures to CSA regulatory requirements, unless specifically exempted by regulation. These requirements included recordkeeping, reporting, and security for all regulated chemical mixtures with the additional requirement of registration for handlers of List I chemicals including regulated chemical mixtures. The DCDCA also provided the Attorney General with the authority to establish regulations to exempt chemical mixtures from the definition of a ‘‘regulated transaction.’’ A chemical mixture can be granted exemption ‘‘based on a finding that the mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance and that the listed chemical or chemicals contained in the mixture cannot be readily recovered’’ (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi)). DEA has treated all regulated chemical mixtures as non-regulated chemicals until such time that it promulgates a final rule that identifies specific chemical mixtures as exempt. This served to prevent the immediate regulation of all qualified mixtures, which is not necessary. It also allowed DEA to gather information to implement regulations pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi). Chemical Mixture Definition Title 21 U.S.C. 802(40) defines the term ‘‘chemical mixture’’ as ‘‘a combination of two or more chemical substances, at least one of which is not a List I chemical or a List II chemical, except that such term does not include any combination of a List I chemical or a List II chemical with another chemical that is present solely as an impurity.’’ Therefore, a chemical mixture contains any number of listed chemicals in E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 36308 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS combination with any number of nonlisted chemicals. DEA does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of a listed chemical and an inert carrier. An inert carrier can be any chemical that does not modify the function of the listed chemical but is present to aid in the delivery of the listed chemical. Examples include, but are not limited to, dilutions in water, alcohol or the presence of a carrier gas. In determining which chemical mixtures shall be subject to control, DEA considers the actual and potential clandestine use of such material. 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi) states that an exemption can be granted if ‘‘the mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance and that the listed chemical or chemicals contained in the mixture cannot be readily recovered.’’ It should be noted that the requirements described by statute do not allow for exemptions based on such business practices as selling only to known customers, the cost of the mixture, the customer’s knowledge of the product’s chemical content, packaging, or such related topics. In 2003, DEA published a Final Rule (68 FR 23195, May 1, 2003) that identified exempt mixtures containing the chemicals ephedrine, Nmethylephedrine, Nmethylpseudoephedrine, norpseudoephedrine, phenylpropanolamine, and pseudoephedrine. The effective date of this Final Rule was June 2, 2003. In a second Final Rule (69 FR 74957, December 15, 2004; corrected at 70 FR 294, January 4, 2005) DEA finalized regulations which addressed the exemption of chemical mixtures for 27 of the remaining 38 listed chemicals. However, chemical mixtures containing phosphorus were not included. The effective date for that Final Rule was January 14, 2005. Uses of Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus Chemical mixtures that contain red phosphorus are used in the manufacture of plastics, flame retardants, pyrotechnics, striker plates (e.g., for safety matches and flares), incendiary shells, smoke bombs, and tracer bullets. Chemical mixtures containing hypophosphorous acid salts (e.g., hypophosphite salts) function as catalysts, stabilizers, and growth inhibitors. They are used in plastics, films, paints, paper products, and fibers, with applications that include automotive parts, furniture, wiring, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 containers, and housings for appliances and power tools. DEA has not identified any chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. Information Gathered by DEA Concerning Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus On January 31, 2003, DEA published in the Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) (68 FR 4968) to solicit input from industry regarding chemical mixtures containing regulated phosphorus. The ANPRM invited interested persons to supply information on formulations that contain regulated phosphorus. DEA received three responses to this request, all from industrial firms. In addition, DEA obtained information on types of formulations containing regulated phosphorus and their uses separate from the ANPRM. All three commenters informed DEA of commercial applications for their chemical mixtures containing regulated phosphorus, which are discussed below. The commenters also informed DEA of concentration ranges for red phosphorus and salts of hypophosphorous acid (e.g. hypophosphite salts). DEA has not identified any chemical mixtures containing hypophosphorous acid or white phosphorus either through industry comments or as a result of DEA research. Comments to the ANPRM One commenter stated that its red phosphorus is stabilized against chemical reactions prior to its use by industry. To achieve this, the red phosphorus is blended with other chemicals to become part of a matrix that protects it from chemical reactions. The amount of red phosphorus formulated in these types of chemical mixtures is not more than 50 percent. The comment claimed that such red phosphorus cannot be used for the illicit production of methamphetamine. Another commenter reported that red phosphorus is formulated with dust suppressing agents. These chemical mixtures have applications as raw material used in different industrial sectors, including in the manufacturing of flame retardants, pyrotechnics, matches, and pesticides. The concentration of red phosphorus in these raw materials/chemical mixtures is generally above 90 percent. Two commenters informed DEA that sodium hypophosphite, a regulated salt of hypophosphorous acid, is used in low concentrations as a stabilizer or as a catalyst. Chemical mixtures for these applications are formulated within a PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 range of less than one percent to no greater than 20 percent in sodium hypophosphite. Both commenters claimed that these formulations are not useful to traffickers. Diversion of Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus Regulated phosphorus plays an important role in the chemical reaction to produce methamphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance for which the public health consequences of the manufacture, trafficking, and abuse are well known and documented. DEA has documented that the predominant method for the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine utilizes phosphorus. DEA has identified chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus at domestic illicit methamphetamine manufacturing sites. Traffickers sometimes utilize the striker plates of safety matchbooks or boxes, or road flares as a source of red phosphorus. The coating on the striker plate contains from 25 to 60 percent red phosphorus. An estimated 20 to 400 striker plates are needed to obtain one gram of red phosphorus. One gram of red phosphorus could yield approximately 1.5 grams of methamphetamine hydrochloride, which is the end product of clandestine manufacturing. DEA conducted a review of data collected by the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC), which collects data on clandestine laboratory seizures by federal and state authorities. In 2004, EPIC reported 4,454 methamphetamine laboratories that utilized red phosphorus; 458 of these obtained the red phosphorus from matchbook striker plates, which is approximately ten percent of the total. EPIC does not report the potential amount of methamphetamine produced from red phosphorus extracted from striker plates. However, only the smallest illicit laboratories (in terms of production capability) are known to use extracted red phosphorus, and these individuals manufacture predominantly for personal use. Although ten percent of the laboratories use extracted red phosphorus, the total amount of methamphetamine produced by these laboratories is relatively small. Large scale methamphetamine laboratories which have been identified by DEA have historically utilized bulk red phosphorus and not red phosphorus extracted from striker plates. Proposed Concentration Limits for Exempt Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus DEA is proposing to establish concentration limits for chemical E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules mixtures containing phosphorus. If finalized as proposed, all chemical mixtures that have a concentration at or below the established concentration limit shall be automatically exempt from CSA chemical regulatory controls. Those chemical mixtures having a concentration above the concentration limit shall be List I regulated chemicals and subject to the chemical regulatory requirements of the CSA. DEA is not aware of any chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. It is believed that few chemical mixtures in this chemical exist because it is too reactive and unstable when mixed with other chemicals. Since DEA has not identified any white phosphorus mixtures, DEA is not proposing a concentration limit for white phosphorus and therefore, any chemical mixture containing white phosphorus would be subject to CSA regulatory control. Hypophosphorous acid is marketed in aqueous solutions of 50 percent and can be readily used in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine. Such aqueous solutions of hypophosphorous acid, however, are not considered chemical mixtures and are therefore currently subject to DEA chemical regulations, regardless of concentration. (As stated earlier, DEA does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of a listed chemical and an inert carrier. An inert carrier can be any chemical that does not modify the function of the listed chemical but is present to aid in the delivery of the listed chemical. Examples include, but are not limited to, dilutions in water, alcohol or the presence of a carrier gas.) No chemical mixtures containing hypophosphorous acid have been identified by DEA. Traffickers use hypophosphite salts and hypophosphorous acid similarly. DEA has identified several chemical mixtures containing hypophosphite salts in combination with other chemicals for use as mold and mildew inhibitors. Additionally, DEA has identified at least one industrial product where sodium hypophosphite is in a chemical mixture in combination with resins. The concentration of hypophosphite salts within these chemical mixtures does not exceed 20 percent. The above chemical mixtures have limited potential for use in a clandestine laboratory because of the (a) low concentrations of the hypophosphite salts, and (b) interference from other chemicals in the mixtures. Therefore, DEA is proposing that a 30 percent concentration limit for VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 hypophosphorous acid and its salts (hypophosphite salts) be established. It is important to clarify, again, that DEA does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of a listed chemical and an inert carrier. Therefore, solutions of hypophosphorous acid or hypophosphite salt in water, alcohol, or another inert carrier, are not considered chemical mixtures and are therefore currently subject to DEA chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration. As discussed above, only the smallest clandestine methamphetamine laboratories use chemical mixtures obtained from matchbook striker plates as a source of red phosphorus. Although concerned about this type of diversion, DEA determined that the regulation of matchbook striker plates is impractical and will create undue administrative burdens for both law enforcement and the regulated sector. DEA is proposing an 80 percent concentration limit for red phosphorus. DEA has determined that chemical mixtures containing over 80 percent red phosphorus are useful in large-scale methamphetamine production and therefore should not be automatically exempt from regulatory controls. A chemical mixture having a regulated form of phosphorus at or below the concentration limit can still be a regulated chemical mixture if another listed chemical is present above its concentration limit. The exemption of chemical mixtures from regulatory controls does not remove criminal liability for persons who knowingly sell or possess any products containing regulated phosphorus for use in violation of the CSA. Exemption by Application Process DEA recognizes that the concentration limits proposed in this rule may not identify all phosphorus mixtures that should receive exemption status. DEA has implemented an application process to exempt additional mixtures (21 CFR 1310.13). This application process was finalized in the Final Rule (68 FR 23195) published May 1, 2003. Under the application process, manufacturers may submit an application for exemption for those mixtures that do not qualify for automatic exemption. Exemption status can be granted if DEA determines that the mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance and the listed chemical cannot be readily recovered (i.e., it meets the conditions in 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi)). An application may be for a single or a multiple number of PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 36309 formulations. All chemical mixtures which are granted exemption via the application process will be listed in 21 CFR 1310.13(i). This rulemaking is also proposing changes to the existing application process. 21 CFR 1310.13(e) provides that within 30 days after the receipt of an application for an exemption, the Administrator will notify the applicant of acceptance or rejection of the application. This paragraph is proposed to be modified in order to clarify that this acceptance or rejection only pertains to the acceptance or rejection of the application ‘‘for filing’’ and does not pertain to the granting or denial of the application based upon the merits of the application. Furthermore, DEA is proposing that this paragraph be modified by removing the 30-day timeframe for notification, and instead, specify that such notification be ‘‘in writing’’ and ‘‘within a reasonable period of time’’. Thresholds and Excluded Transactions for Regulated Phosphorus Chemical Mixtures Regulated phosphorus compounds do not have a threshold as described in 21 CFR 1310.04(g)(1). Thus, all transactions in regulated phosphorus, including its regulated chemical mixtures, are regulated transactions. Certain transactions, described in 21 CFR 1310.08, are excluded from the definition of a regulated transaction. These are domestic and international return shipments of reusable containers from customer to producer containing residual quantities of red phosphorus or white phosphorus in rail cars and intermodal tank containers which conform to International Standards Organization specifications (with capacities greater than or equal to 2,500 gallons in a single container). This exclusion also applies to regulated chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus or white phosphorus. Requirements That Apply to Regulated List I Chemical Mixtures Persons interested in handling List I chemicals, including regulated chemical mixtures containing List I chemicals, must comply with the following: Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports, or exports a List I chemical, or proposes to engage in the manufacture, distribution, importation, or exportation of a List I chemical, must obtain a registration pursuant to the CSA (21 U.S.C. 823, 957). Regulations describing registration for List I chemical handlers are set forth in 21 CFR part 1309. E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS 36310 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules Separate registration is required for manufacturing, distribution, importing, and exporting. Different locations operated by a single entity require separate registration if any location is involved with the manufacture, distribution, import, or export of a List I chemical. Any person manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting a regulated List I chemical mixture is subject to the registration requirement under the CSA. DEA recognizes, however, that it is not possible for persons who manufacture, distribute, import, or export regulated phosphorus compounds, to immediately complete and submit an application for registration and for DEA to issue registrations immediately for those activities. Therefore, to allow continued legitimate commerce in the compounds, DEA is proposing to establish in 21 CFR 1310.09 a temporary exemption from the registration requirement for persons desiring to manufacture, distribute, import, or export regulated phosphorus compounds, provided that DEA receives a properly completed application for registration on or before 30 days after DEA publishes a Final Rule finalizing these requirements in the Federal Register. The temporary exemption for such persons will remain in effect until DEA takes final action on their application for registration. The temporary exemption applies solely to the registration requirement; all other chemical control requirements, including recordkeeping and reporting, will remain in effect. Additionally, the temporary exemption does not suspend applicable federal criminal laws relating to the phosphorus compounds, nor does it supersede state or local laws or regulations. All handlers of these materials must comply with their state and local requirements in addition to the CSA and other federal regulatory controls. DEA notes that warehouses are exempt from the requirement of registration and may lawfully possess List I chemicals, if the possession of those chemicals is in the usual course of business (21 U.S.C. 822(c)(2), 21 U.S.C. 957(b)(1)(B)). For purposes of this exemption, the warehouse must receive the List I chemical from a DEA registrant and shall only distribute the List I chemical back to the DEA registrant and registered location from which it was received. All other activities conducted by a warehouse do not fall under this exemption; a warehouse that distributes List I chemicals to persons other than the registrant and registered location from which they were obtained is conducting distribution activities and is required to VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 register as such (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(ii)). Records and Reports. The CSA (21 U.S.C. 830) requires that certain records be kept and reports be made that involve listed chemicals. Regulations describing recordkeeping and reporting requirements are set forth in 21 CFR part 1310. A record must be made and maintained for two years after the date of a transaction involving a listed chemical, provided the transaction is a regulated transaction. Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a regulated mixture shall submit manufacturing, inventory and use data on an annual basis (21 CFR 1310.05(d)). Bulk manufacturers producing the mixture solely for internal consumption, e.g., formulating a non-regulated mixture, are not required to submit this information. Existing standard industry reports containing the required information are acceptable, provided the information is readily retrievable from the report. Title 21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each regulated person shall report to DEA any regulated transaction involving an extraordinary quantity of a listed chemical, an uncommon method of payment or delivery, or any other circumstance that the regulated person believes may indicate that the listed chemical will be used in violation of the CSA. Regulated persons are also required to report to DEA any proposed regulated transaction with a person whose description or other identifying information has been furnished to the regulated person. Finally, regulated persons are required to report any unusual or excessive loss or disappearance of a listed chemical. Import/Export. All imports/exports of a listed chemical shall comply with the CSA (21 U.S.C. 957 and 971). Regulations for importation and exportation of List I chemicals are described in 21 CFR part 1313. Separate registration is necessary for each activity (21 CFR 1309.22). Security. All applicants and registrants shall provide effective controls against theft and diversion of chemicals as described in 21 CFR 1309.71. Administrative Inspection. Places, including factories, warehouses, or other establishments and conveyances, where regulated persons may lawfully hold, manufacture, or distribute, dispense, administer, or otherwise dispose of a regulated chemical/ chemical mixture, or where records relating to those activities are maintained, are controlled premises as defined in 21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA (21 U.S.C. 880) allows for administrative PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 inspections of these controlled premises as provided in 21 CFR 1316 subpart A. The goal of this rulemaking is to deny traffickers access to regulated phosphorus compounds while minimizing the burden on legitimate industry. Persons who obtain a regulated chemical, but do not distribute the chemical, are end users. End users are not subject to CSA chemical regulatory control provisions such as registration or recordkeeping requirements. Some examples of end users are those who chemically react phosphorus compounds and change them into non-listed chemicals, formulate phosphorus compounds into exempt chemical mixtures or consume them in industrial processes. Technical Revision to 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i) While preparing this rulemaking, DEA became aware that references to section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971) were inadvertently omitted from 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i). Therefore, DEA is proposing that this rulemaking amend these sections by adding this citation. This insertion is a clarification and does not alter the current treatment of exempt chemical mixtures under the CSA. As DEA discussed in its December 15, 2004, Final Rule (specifically 69 FR 74963, comment 10) all chemical mixtures not exempt from CSA regulatory controls are subject to all aspects of those controls, including importation and exportation requirements. Thus, chemical mixtures that are exempt under 21 CFR 1310.12 and 1310.13 are also exempt from the requirements of Section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971). The requirements of 21 U.S.C. 971 apply to ‘‘each regulated person, who imports or exports a listed chemical.’’ Since a person distributing an exempt chemical mixture is not a ‘‘regulated person’’ as defined by 21 U.S.C. 802(38), that person is exempt from the requirements of 21 U.S.C. 971. DEA notes that this is a technical correction only. All exempt chemical mixtures have been treated as such for import and export purposes, and all regulated mixtures have been treated as regulated transactions for import and export purposes. DEA is merely including a reference which was inadvertently omitted from this regulatory language. Regulatory Certifications Regulatory Flexibility and Small Business Concerns The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this rulemaking has been E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS drafted in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612). In the ANPRM, DEA sought information from manufacturers about the impact of setting concentration limits for chemical mixtures containing phosphorus. Only three companies, none small businesses, provided information. Some of the mixtures sold by one of the commenters would be subject to this proposed rule, but DEA could not determine whether any of the products that may be produced with those phosphorus mixtures would also be covered. DEA is, therefore, seeking comments on whether any of the products contain phosphorus would exceed the proposed concentration limits. DEA notes, however, that the cost of compliance with the rule is low and is unlikely to impose a significant cost on any manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting firm. The recordkeeping requirements can be met with standard business records; most firms maintain adequate security to meet DEA’s regulations. The primary cost of compliance is the registration fee. For manufacturers, the registration fee is $2,293 annually; for distributors, importers, and exporters, the fee is $1,147 annually. These fees are substantially less than one percent of annual sales for manufacturers, distributors, importers, and exporters. Data from the 2002 Economic Census indicate that small chemical manufacturers generally have sales well above $1 million; most small chemical distributors have sales above $250,000. Executive Order 12866 This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, Section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. It has been determined that this rule is a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866, Section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and Review, and accordingly this rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. The information DEA received in response to the ANPRM indicates that few phosphorus mixtures will be subject to the regulation. Those mixtures appear to be produced by current DEA registrants on whom the rule will impose no new requirements. DEA is seeking comments on whether any firms purchasing covered mixtures are producing products that would themselves be subject to the rule. As stated earlier in this rulemaking the vast majority of the chemical mixtures that will become subject to this proposed rulemaking have large industrial uses. Regulated chemical mixtures are not items having common VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 household uses. Although concerned about the diversion of matchbook striker plates, DEA determined that the regulation of matchbook striker plates is impractical and will create undue administrative burdens for both law enforcement and the regulated sector. Benefits. Phosphorus is a chemical important in the clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine and amphetamine. This rule seeks to eliminate the use of certain chemical mixtures whose high concentrations of phosphorus make them valued by traffickers seeking this chemical for their clandestine laboratory operations. Methamphetamine remains the primary drug produced in illicit laboratories within the U.S. Data from the El Paso Intelligence Center’s (EPIC) Clandestine Laboratory Database indicates that there were more than 17,170 methamphetamine laboratory incidents in calendar year 2004; in 2005, as State laws began to limit sales of over-the-counter medications containing primary ingredients used in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine (ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine), the number of incidents declined to 12,139. In 2006, with both State and Federal controls coming into effect, the number of incidents fell significantly to 7,347, but that is still about 20 clandestine laboratory incidents a day. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Drug Abuse Warning Network, in 2003, the latest year for which data are available (since SAMHSA is currently amending 2004, 2005, and 2006 data), amphetamine and methamphetamine emergency department (ED) visits rose from 25,200 in 1995 to 38,960 in 2002 and 42,500 in 2003 If the cost of the ED visit is $500, which is probably low in many areas, the total cost for 42,500 visits would have been $21.25 million for 2003. The surge in methamphetamine abuse and the manufacture of the drug in clandestine laboratories have caused serious law enforcement and environmental problems, particularly in rural communities. Rural areas are frequently the site of clandestine laboratories because the manufacturing process produces distinctive odors and can be identified if there are close neighbors. Besides causing crime as clandestine laboratory operators steal ingredients to make methamphetamine and steal to support their addiction, the clandestine laboratories often leave serious pollution behind. A laboratory can produce 6 to 10 pounds of hazardous waste for every pound of PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 36311 methamphetamine produced. As DEA noted in its Interim Final Rule implementing the retail sales requirements of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) (Title VII of Pub. L. 109– 172), clean-up costs in Fiscal Year 2006 were more than $12 million (71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006). The Federal and State cleanups are generally limited to removing chemicals that could be reused; they do not address water and soil pollution that remains. Owners of the property are responsible for completing the cleanup of contaminated water and soil, but if the owner cannot pay the cost, either the local governments must bear the burden or the contamination remains. This rule is intended to continue the trend of reducing the number of clandestine laboratories. This trend will reduce the cost to State and local governments as well as the hazard to law enforcement officers and others from exposure to the toxic chemicals left behind. Executive Order 12988 This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform. Executive Order 13132 This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications warranting the application of Executive Order 13132. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $120,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Congressional Review Act This rule is not a major rule as defined by Section 804 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in cost or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 36312 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and export markets. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule proposes that chemical mixtures containing 80 percent and less of red phosphorus or 30 percent and less of hypophosphorous acid or its salts are automatically exempt from CSA regulatory controls pertaining to chemicals and that no automatic exemption be established for chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. Under this proposed method of automatic exemption, persons who handle these exempt chemical mixtures will not be subject to CSA regulatory controls, including the requirement to register with DEA, the requirement to report manufacturing activities to DEA annually, and the requirement to file importation and exportation advance notification and return declaration information with DEA. For persons handling regulated chemical mixtures, DEA anticipates granting some of these mixtures exempt status by the application process (21 CFR 1310.13). At this time, DEA lacks specific information regarding the potential impact of this regulation on the regulated industry. DEA does not believe that the impact will be significant, and has been unable to identify any chemical mixtures that are certain to be affected by this regulation. DEA also anticipates that some chemical mixtures would be granted exemptions based on the application process. DEA does not have reliable estimates regarding the number of persons who would be required to register as a result of the control of chemical mixtures containing regulated forms of phosphorus. Nor does DEA have accurate estimates regarding manufacturing, import and export activities involving chemicals mixtures addressed in this rulemaking. Responses to the previous Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking did not address this issue. Therefore, DEA is specifically seeking information regarding the number of persons affected, and the potential number of importation and exportation transactions that would be affected by this regulation. Therefore, DEA will revise three existing information collections related to the handling of chemical mixtures containing listed forms of phosphorus once it receives further information: • ‘‘Application for Registration under Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993 and Renewal Application for Registration under Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993’’ [OMB information collection 1117–0031] • ‘‘Annual Reporting Requirement for Manufacturers of Listed Chemicals’’ [OMB information collection 1117– 0029] • ‘‘Import/Export Declaration for List I and List II Chemicals’’ [OMB information collection 1117–0023] List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310 Drug traffic control, List I and List II chemicals, reporting requirements. For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR Part 1310 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 1310— RECORDS AND REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS AND CERTAIN MACHINES [AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 1310 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 802, 827(h), 830, 871(b), 890. 2. Section 1310.09 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as follows: § 1310.09 Temporary Exemption From Registration. * * * * * (k) Each person required by Sections 302 and 1007 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822 and 957) to obtain a registration to manufacture, distribute, import, or export regulated chemical mixtures which contain red phosphorus, white phosphorus, hypophosphorous acid (and its salts), pursuant to Sections 1310.12 and 1310.13, is temporarily exempted from the registration requirement, provided that DEA receives a properly completed application for registration or application for exemption on or before July 26, 2010. The exemption will remain in effect for each person who has made such application until the Administrator has approved or denied that application. This exemption applies only to registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in parts 1309, 1310, and 1313 of this chapter remain in full force and effect. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports, or exports a chemical mixture whose application for exemption is subsequently denied by DEA must obtain a registration with DEA. A temporary exemption from the registration requirement will also be provided for these persons, provided that DEA receives a properly completed application for registration on or before 30 days following the date of official DEA notification that the application for exemption has not been approved. The temporary exemption for such persons will remain in effect until DEA takes final action on their registration application. 3. Section 1310.12 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and by amending the Table of Concentration Limits in paragraph (c) by adding entries for ‘‘hypophosphorous acid and its salts’’, ‘‘red phosphorus’’, and ‘‘white phosphorus’’ in alphabetical order to read as follows: § 1310.12 Exempt Chemical Mixtures. (a) The chemical mixtures meeting the criteria in paragraphs (c) or (d) of this Section are exempted by the Administrator from application of Sections 302, 303, 310, 1007, 1008, and 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 830, 957, 958, and 971) to the extent described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this Section. * * * * * (c) * * * TABLE OF CONCENTRATION LIMITS mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS List I chemicals DEA chemical code number Concentration (percent) Special conditions * Hypophosphorous acid and its salts. * * 30% by weight if a solid, weight or volume if a liquid. * * * * The weight is determined by measuring the mass of hypophosphorous acid and its salts in the mixture; the concentration limit is calculated by summing the concentrations of all forms of hypophosphorous acid and its salts in the mixture. The Administration does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of a listed chemical and an inert carrier. Therefore, any solution consisting of hypophosphorous acid (and its salts), dispersed in water, alcohol, or another inert carrier, is not considered a chemical mixture and is therefore subject to chemical regulatory controls at all concentrations. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 6797 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1 36313 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 122 / Friday, June 25, 2010 / Proposed Rules TABLE OF CONCENTRATION LIMITS—Continued List I chemicals DEA chemical code number * Red Phosphorus ..... * * White phosphorus ... * * List II chemicals. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Concentration (percent) 6795 * 80% by weight. 6796 * Not exempt at any concentration. * * * * * 4. Section 1310.13 is amended by revising paragraph (e) and paragraph (i) introductory text to read as follows: § 1310.13 Exemption of chemical mixtures; application. mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS * * * * * (e) Within a reasonable period of time after the receipt of an application for an exemption under this section, the Administrator will notify the applicant in writing of the acceptance or rejection of the application for filing. If the application is not accepted for filing, an explanation will be provided. The Administrator is not required to accept an application if any information required pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section or requested pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section is lacking or not readily understood. The applicant may, however, amend the application to meet the requirements of paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section. If the exemption is subsequently granted, the applicant shall again be notified in writing and the Administrator shall issue, and publish in the Federal Register, an order on the application. This order shall specify the date on which it shall take effect. The Administrator shall permit any interested person to file written comments on or objections to the order. If any comments or objections raise significant issues regarding any findings of fact or conclusions of law upon which the order is based, the Administrator may suspend the effectiveness of the order until he has reconsidered the application in light of the comments and objections filed. Thereafter, the Administrator shall reinstate, terminate, or amend the original order as deemed appropriate. * * * * * (i) The following chemical mixtures, in the form and quantity listed in the application submitted (indicated as the ‘‘date’’) are designated as exempt chemical mixtures for the purposes set VerDate Mar<15>2010 Special conditions 16:24 Jun 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 * * Dated: June 16, 2010. Michele M. Leonhart, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2010–15160 Filed 6–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–09–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 117 [Docket No. USCG–2010–0441] RIN 1625–AA09 Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Arkansas Waterway, Pine Bluff, AR Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes that operating procedures on the Rob Roy Drawbridge across the Arkansas Waterway at mile 67.4 at Pine Bluff, AR be revised in the Code of Federal Regulations to reflect that vessel operators contact the remote drawbridge operator via microphone keying on VHF–FM Channel 12 when requesting a draw opening. This keying activates an indicator on the remote drawbridge operator’s console and sends an acknowledgement tone back to the vessel and the remote drawbridge operator then establishes normal verbal radio communications. This protocol is used to isolate and differentiate these radio communications from the railroad communications that the remote drawbridge operator receives, thus ensuring that vessel calls receive immediate attention. PO 00000 Frm 00018 * * * * * Chemical mixtures containing any amount of white phosphorus are not exempt due to concentration, unless otherwise exempted. forth in this section and are exempted by the Administrator from application of Sections 302, 303, 310, 1007, 1008, and 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822, 823, 830, 957, 958, and 971): * * * * * ACTION: * Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or before August 24, 2010. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2010–0441 using any one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. (2) Fax: 202–493–2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590– 0001. (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or e-mail Mr. Eric Washburn, Bridge Administrator, Eighth Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch; telephone 314–269–2378, e-mail Eric.Washburn@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted, without change to https:// www.regulations.gov and will include E:\FR\FM\25JNP1.SGM 25JNP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 122 (Friday, June 25, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36306-36313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15160]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

21 CFR Part 1310

[Docket No. DEA-228P]
RIN 1117-AA66


Chemical Mixtures Containing Listed Forms of Phosphorus and 
Change in Application Process

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DEA is proposing regulations which establish those 
chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus, white phosphorus (also 
known as yellow phosphorus), or hypophosphorous acid and its salts 
(hereinafter ``regulated phosphorus'') that shall automatically qualify 
for exemption from the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) regulatory 
controls. DEA is proposing that chemical mixtures containing red 
phosphorus in a concentration of 80 percent or less and mixtures 
containing hypophosphorous acid and its salts (hypophosphite salts) in 
a concentration of 30 percent and less, shall qualify for automatic 
exemption. DEA is not proposing automatic exemption for chemical 
mixtures containing white phosphorus. Unless otherwise exempted, all 
material containing white phosphorus shall become subject to CSA 
chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration.
    DEA recognizes that concentration criteria alone cannot identify 
all mixtures that warrant exemption, therefore, an application process 
has been implemented which allows manufacturers to apply for exemption 
from CSA regulatory controls for those phosphorus chemical mixtures 
that do not qualify for automatic exemption. This rulemaking also 
proposes changes to the application review and notification process.
    While preparing this rulemaking, DEA became aware that references 
to section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971) were inadvertently omitted 
from 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i). Therefore, DEA is proposing that 
this rulemaking amend these sections by adding this citation. This 
insertion is a clarification and does not alter the current treatment 
of exempt chemical mixtures under the CSA.

DATES: Written comments must be postmarked, and electronic comments 
must be sent, on or before August 24, 2010.

ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference 
``Docket No. DEA-228P'' on all written and electronic correspondence. 
Written comments being sent via regular mail should be sent to the 
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 
22152. Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL. Written 
comments sent via express mail should be sent to DEA Headquarters, 
Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODL, 8701 Morrissette 
Drive, Springfield, VA 22152.

[[Page 36307]]

Comments may be directly sent to DEA electronically by sending an 
electronic message to dea.diversion.policy@usdoj.gov. Comments may also 
be sent electronically through https://www.regulations.gov using the 
electronic comment form provided on that site. An electronic copy of 
this document is also available at the https://www.regulations.gov Web 
site. DEA will accept attachments to electronic comments in Microsoft 
Word, WordPerfect, Adobe PDF, or Excel file formats only. DEA will not 
accept any file format other than those specifically listed here.
    Posting of Public Comments: Please note that all comments received 
are considered part of the public record and made available for public 
inspection online at https://www.regulations.gov and in the Drug 
Enforcement Administration's public docket. Such information includes 
personal identifying information (such as your name, address, etc.) 
voluntarily submitted by the commenter.
    If you want to submit personal identifying information (such as 
your name, address, etc.) as part of your comment, but do not want it 
to be posted online or made available in the public docket, you must 
include the phrase ``PERSONAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION'' in the first 
paragraph of your comment. You must also place all the personal 
identifying information you do not want posted online or made available 
in the public docket in the first paragraph of your comment and 
identify what information you want redacted.
    If you want to submit confidential business information as part of 
your comment, but do not want it to be posted online or made available 
in the public docket, you must include the phrase ``CONFIDENTIAL 
BUSINESS INFORMATION'' in the first paragraph of your comment. You must 
also prominently identify confidential business information to be 
redacted within the comment. If a comment has so much confidential 
business information that it cannot be effectively redacted, all or 
part of that comment may not be posted online or made available in the 
public docket.
    Personal identifying information and confidential business 
information identified and located as set forth above will be redacted 
and the comment, in redacted form, will be posted online and placed in 
the Drug Enforcement Administration's public docket file. Please note 
that the Freedom of Information Act applies to all comments received. 
If you wish to inspect the agency's public docket file in person by 
appointment, please see the For Further Information paragraph.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, Ph.D., Chief, 
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 
22152. Telephone: (202) 307-7183.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

DEA's Legal Authority

    DEA implements the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control 
Act of 1970, often referred to as the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) 
and Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 801-971), as 
amended. DEA publishes the implementing regulations for these statutes 
in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Parts 1300 to 
end. These regulations are designed to ensure that there is a 
sufficient supply of controlled substances for legitimate medical 
purposes and to deter the diversion of controlled substances to illegal 
purposes. The CSA mandates that DEA establish a closed system of 
control for manufacturing, distributing, and dispensing controlled 
substances. Any person who manufactures, distributes, dispenses, 
imports, exports, or conducts research or chemical analysis with 
controlled substances must register with DEA (unless exempt) and comply 
with the applicable requirements for the activity. The CSA as amended 
also requires DEA to regulate the manufacture, distribution, 
importation, and exportation of chemicals that may be used to 
manufacture controlled substances. Listed chemicals that are classified 
as List I chemicals are important to the manufacture of controlled 
substances. Those classified as List II chemicals may be used to 
manufacture controlled substances.

Purpose of This Rule

    In this rule, DEA is proposing concentration limits on chemical 
mixtures containing red phosphorus and/or hypophosphorous acid and its 
salts. If this rule is finalized as proposed, chemical mixtures 
containing either of these listed chemicals at or below the 
concentration limit would be automatically exempt from Controlled 
Substances Act (CSA) regulatory controls. Mixtures containing these 
chemicals above the concentration limit would be regulated as List I 
chemicals. DEA is not proposing automatic exemption for chemical 
mixtures containing white phosphorus. Unless otherwise exempted, all 
material containing white phosphorus shall become subject to CSA 
chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration.

DEA's Requirement To Identify Exempt Chemical Mixtures

    The Chemical Diversion and Trafficking Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-
690) (CDTA) created a definition for the term ``chemical mixture'' (21 
U.S.C. 802(40)). The CDTA established 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi) to 
exclude ``any transaction in a chemical mixture'' from the definition 
of a ``regulated transaction.'' This exemption was exploited by those 
that traffic chemicals for illicit purposes in that it provided an 
unregulated source for obtaining listed chemicals for use in the 
illicit manufacture of controlled substances.
    In April 1994, the Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993 
(DCDCA) corrected this situation by subjecting such chemical mixtures 
to CSA regulatory requirements, unless specifically exempted by 
regulation. These requirements included recordkeeping, reporting, and 
security for all regulated chemical mixtures with the additional 
requirement of registration for handlers of List I chemicals including 
regulated chemical mixtures. The DCDCA also provided the Attorney 
General with the authority to establish regulations to exempt chemical 
mixtures from the definition of a ``regulated transaction.'' A chemical 
mixture can be granted exemption ``based on a finding that the mixture 
is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in the 
illicit production of a controlled substance and that the listed 
chemical or chemicals contained in the mixture cannot be readily 
recovered'' (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi)).
    DEA has treated all regulated chemical mixtures as non-regulated 
chemicals until such time that it promulgates a final rule that 
identifies specific chemical mixtures as exempt. This served to prevent 
the immediate regulation of all qualified mixtures, which is not 
necessary. It also allowed DEA to gather information to implement 
regulations pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi).

Chemical Mixture Definition

    Title 21 U.S.C. 802(40) defines the term ``chemical mixture'' as 
``a combination of two or more chemical substances, at least one of 
which is not a List I chemical or a List II chemical, except that such 
term does not include any combination of a List I chemical or a List II 
chemical with another chemical that is present solely as an impurity.'' 
Therefore, a chemical mixture contains any number of listed chemicals 
in

[[Page 36308]]

combination with any number of non-listed chemicals.
    DEA does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of 
a listed chemical and an inert carrier. An inert carrier can be any 
chemical that does not modify the function of the listed chemical but 
is present to aid in the delivery of the listed chemical. Examples 
include, but are not limited to, dilutions in water, alcohol or the 
presence of a carrier gas.
    In determining which chemical mixtures shall be subject to control, 
DEA considers the actual and potential clandestine use of such 
material. 21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi) states that an exemption can be 
granted if ``the mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be 
easily used in the illicit production of a controlled substance and 
that the listed chemical or chemicals contained in the mixture cannot 
be readily recovered.'' It should be noted that the requirements 
described by statute do not allow for exemptions based on such business 
practices as selling only to known customers, the cost of the mixture, 
the customer's knowledge of the product's chemical content, packaging, 
or such related topics.
    In 2003, DEA published a Final Rule (68 FR 23195, May 1, 2003) that 
identified exempt mixtures containing the chemicals ephedrine, N-
methylephedrine, N-methylpseudoephedrine, norpseudoephedrine, 
phenylpropanolamine, and pseudoephedrine. The effective date of this 
Final Rule was June 2, 2003. In a second Final Rule (69 FR 74957, 
December 15, 2004; corrected at 70 FR 294, January 4, 2005) DEA 
finalized regulations which addressed the exemption of chemical 
mixtures for 27 of the remaining 38 listed chemicals. However, chemical 
mixtures containing phosphorus were not included. The effective date 
for that Final Rule was January 14, 2005.

Uses of Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus

    Chemical mixtures that contain red phosphorus are used in the 
manufacture of plastics, flame retardants, pyrotechnics, striker plates 
(e.g., for safety matches and flares), incendiary shells, smoke bombs, 
and tracer bullets. Chemical mixtures containing hypophosphorous acid 
salts (e.g., hypophosphite salts) function as catalysts, stabilizers, 
and growth inhibitors. They are used in plastics, films, paints, paper 
products, and fibers, with applications that include automotive parts, 
furniture, wiring, containers, and housings for appliances and power 
tools. DEA has not identified any chemical mixtures containing white 
phosphorus.

Information Gathered by DEA Concerning Chemical Mixtures Containing 
Regulated Phosphorus

    On January 31, 2003, DEA published in the Federal Register an 
Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) (68 FR 4968) to solicit 
input from industry regarding chemical mixtures containing regulated 
phosphorus. The ANPRM invited interested persons to supply information 
on formulations that contain regulated phosphorus. DEA received three 
responses to this request, all from industrial firms. In addition, DEA 
obtained information on types of formulations containing regulated 
phosphorus and their uses separate from the ANPRM.
    All three commenters informed DEA of commercial applications for 
their chemical mixtures containing regulated phosphorus, which are 
discussed below. The commenters also informed DEA of concentration 
ranges for red phosphorus and salts of hypophosphorous acid (e.g. 
hypophosphite salts). DEA has not identified any chemical mixtures 
containing hypophosphorous acid or white phosphorus either through 
industry comments or as a result of DEA research.

Comments to the ANPRM

    One commenter stated that its red phosphorus is stabilized against 
chemical reactions prior to its use by industry. To achieve this, the 
red phosphorus is blended with other chemicals to become part of a 
matrix that protects it from chemical reactions. The amount of red 
phosphorus formulated in these types of chemical mixtures is not more 
than 50 percent. The comment claimed that such red phosphorus cannot be 
used for the illicit production of methamphetamine.
    Another commenter reported that red phosphorus is formulated with 
dust suppressing agents. These chemical mixtures have applications as 
raw material used in different industrial sectors, including in the 
manufacturing of flame retardants, pyrotechnics, matches, and 
pesticides. The concentration of red phosphorus in these raw materials/
chemical mixtures is generally above 90 percent.
    Two commenters informed DEA that sodium hypophosphite, a regulated 
salt of hypophosphorous acid, is used in low concentrations as a 
stabilizer or as a catalyst. Chemical mixtures for these applications 
are formulated within a range of less than one percent to no greater 
than 20 percent in sodium hypophosphite. Both commenters claimed that 
these formulations are not useful to traffickers.

Diversion of Chemical Mixtures Containing Regulated Phosphorus

    Regulated phosphorus plays an important role in the chemical 
reaction to produce methamphetamine, a schedule II controlled substance 
for which the public health consequences of the manufacture, 
trafficking, and abuse are well known and documented. DEA has 
documented that the predominant method for the illicit manufacture of 
methamphetamine utilizes phosphorus.
    DEA has identified chemical mixtures containing red phosphorus at 
domestic illicit methamphetamine manufacturing sites. Traffickers 
sometimes utilize the striker plates of safety matchbooks or boxes, or 
road flares as a source of red phosphorus. The coating on the striker 
plate contains from 25 to 60 percent red phosphorus. An estimated 20 to 
400 striker plates are needed to obtain one gram of red phosphorus. One 
gram of red phosphorus could yield approximately 1.5 grams of 
methamphetamine hydrochloride, which is the end product of clandestine 
manufacturing. DEA conducted a review of data collected by the El Paso 
Intelligence Center (EPIC), which collects data on clandestine 
laboratory seizures by federal and state authorities. In 2004, EPIC 
reported 4,454 methamphetamine laboratories that utilized red 
phosphorus; 458 of these obtained the red phosphorus from matchbook 
striker plates, which is approximately ten percent of the total.
    EPIC does not report the potential amount of methamphetamine 
produced from red phosphorus extracted from striker plates. However, 
only the smallest illicit laboratories (in terms of production 
capability) are known to use extracted red phosphorus, and these 
individuals manufacture predominantly for personal use. Although ten 
percent of the laboratories use extracted red phosphorus, the total 
amount of methamphetamine produced by these laboratories is relatively 
small. Large scale methamphetamine laboratories which have been 
identified by DEA have historically utilized bulk red phosphorus and 
not red phosphorus extracted from striker plates.

Proposed Concentration Limits for Exempt Chemical Mixtures Containing 
Regulated Phosphorus

    DEA is proposing to establish concentration limits for chemical

[[Page 36309]]

mixtures containing phosphorus. If finalized as proposed, all chemical 
mixtures that have a concentration at or below the established 
concentration limit shall be automatically exempt from CSA chemical 
regulatory controls. Those chemical mixtures having a concentration 
above the concentration limit shall be List I regulated chemicals and 
subject to the chemical regulatory requirements of the CSA.
    DEA is not aware of any chemical mixtures containing white 
phosphorus. It is believed that few chemical mixtures in this chemical 
exist because it is too reactive and unstable when mixed with other 
chemicals. Since DEA has not identified any white phosphorus mixtures, 
DEA is not proposing a concentration limit for white phosphorus and 
therefore, any chemical mixture containing white phosphorus would be 
subject to CSA regulatory control.
    Hypophosphorous acid is marketed in aqueous solutions of 50 percent 
and can be readily used in the illicit manufacture of methamphetamine. 
Such aqueous solutions of hypophosphorous acid, however, are not 
considered chemical mixtures and are therefore currently subject to DEA 
chemical regulations, regardless of concentration. (As stated earlier, 
DEA does not consider a chemical mixture to mean the combination of a 
listed chemical and an inert carrier. An inert carrier can be any 
chemical that does not modify the function of the listed chemical but 
is present to aid in the delivery of the listed chemical. Examples 
include, but are not limited to, dilutions in water, alcohol or the 
presence of a carrier gas.) No chemical mixtures containing 
hypophosphorous acid have been identified by DEA.
    Traffickers use hypophosphite salts and hypophosphorous acid 
similarly. DEA has identified several chemical mixtures containing 
hypophosphite salts in combination with other chemicals for use as mold 
and mildew inhibitors. Additionally, DEA has identified at least one 
industrial product where sodium hypophosphite is in a chemical mixture 
in combination with resins. The concentration of hypophosphite salts 
within these chemical mixtures does not exceed 20 percent.
    The above chemical mixtures have limited potential for use in a 
clandestine laboratory because of the (a) low concentrations of the 
hypophosphite salts, and (b) interference from other chemicals in the 
mixtures. Therefore, DEA is proposing that a 30 percent concentration 
limit for hypophosphorous acid and its salts (hypophosphite salts) be 
established.
    It is important to clarify, again, that DEA does not consider a 
chemical mixture to mean the combination of a listed chemical and an 
inert carrier. Therefore, solutions of hypophosphorous acid or 
hypophosphite salt in water, alcohol, or another inert carrier, are not 
considered chemical mixtures and are therefore currently subject to DEA 
chemical regulatory controls regardless of concentration.
    As discussed above, only the smallest clandestine methamphetamine 
laboratories use chemical mixtures obtained from matchbook striker 
plates as a source of red phosphorus. Although concerned about this 
type of diversion, DEA determined that the regulation of matchbook 
striker plates is impractical and will create undue administrative 
burdens for both law enforcement and the regulated sector.
    DEA is proposing an 80 percent concentration limit for red 
phosphorus. DEA has determined that chemical mixtures containing over 
80 percent red phosphorus are useful in large-scale methamphetamine 
production and therefore should not be automatically exempt from 
regulatory controls.
    A chemical mixture having a regulated form of phosphorus at or 
below the concentration limit can still be a regulated chemical mixture 
if another listed chemical is present above its concentration limit. 
The exemption of chemical mixtures from regulatory controls does not 
remove criminal liability for persons who knowingly sell or possess any 
products containing regulated phosphorus for use in violation of the 
CSA.

Exemption by Application Process

    DEA recognizes that the concentration limits proposed in this rule 
may not identify all phosphorus mixtures that should receive exemption 
status. DEA has implemented an application process to exempt additional 
mixtures (21 CFR 1310.13). This application process was finalized in 
the Final Rule (68 FR 23195) published May 1, 2003. Under the 
application process, manufacturers may submit an application for 
exemption for those mixtures that do not qualify for automatic 
exemption. Exemption status can be granted if DEA determines that the 
mixture is formulated in such a way that it cannot be easily used in 
the illicit production of a controlled substance and the listed 
chemical cannot be readily recovered (i.e., it meets the conditions in 
21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(vi)). An application may be for a single or a 
multiple number of formulations. All chemical mixtures which are 
granted exemption via the application process will be listed in 21 CFR 
1310.13(i).
    This rulemaking is also proposing changes to the existing 
application process. 21 CFR 1310.13(e) provides that within 30 days 
after the receipt of an application for an exemption, the Administrator 
will notify the applicant of acceptance or rejection of the 
application. This paragraph is proposed to be modified in order to 
clarify that this acceptance or rejection only pertains to the 
acceptance or rejection of the application ``for filing'' and does not 
pertain to the granting or denial of the application based upon the 
merits of the application. Furthermore, DEA is proposing that this 
paragraph be modified by removing the 30-day timeframe for 
notification, and instead, specify that such notification be ``in 
writing'' and ``within a reasonable period of time''.

Thresholds and Excluded Transactions for Regulated Phosphorus Chemical 
Mixtures

    Regulated phosphorus compounds do not have a threshold as described 
in 21 CFR 1310.04(g)(1). Thus, all transactions in regulated 
phosphorus, including its regulated chemical mixtures, are regulated 
transactions. Certain transactions, described in 21 CFR 1310.08, are 
excluded from the definition of a regulated transaction. These are 
domestic and international return shipments of reusable containers from 
customer to producer containing residual quantities of red phosphorus 
or white phosphorus in rail cars and intermodal tank containers which 
conform to International Standards Organization specifications (with 
capacities greater than or equal to 2,500 gallons in a single 
container). This exclusion also applies to regulated chemical mixtures 
containing red phosphorus or white phosphorus.

Requirements That Apply to Regulated List I Chemical Mixtures

    Persons interested in handling List I chemicals, including 
regulated chemical mixtures containing List I chemicals, must comply 
with the following:
    Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports, or 
exports a List I chemical, or proposes to engage in the manufacture, 
distribution, importation, or exportation of a List I chemical, must 
obtain a registration pursuant to the CSA (21 U.S.C. 823, 957). 
Regulations describing registration for List I chemical handlers are 
set forth in 21 CFR part 1309.

[[Page 36310]]

    Separate registration is required for manufacturing, distribution, 
importing, and exporting. Different locations operated by a single 
entity require separate registration if any location is involved with 
the manufacture, distribution, import, or export of a List I chemical. 
Any person manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting a 
regulated List I chemical mixture is subject to the registration 
requirement under the CSA. DEA recognizes, however, that it is not 
possible for persons who manufacture, distribute, import, or export 
regulated phosphorus compounds, to immediately complete and submit an 
application for registration and for DEA to issue registrations 
immediately for those activities. Therefore, to allow continued 
legitimate commerce in the compounds, DEA is proposing to establish in 
21 CFR 1310.09 a temporary exemption from the registration requirement 
for persons desiring to manufacture, distribute, import, or export 
regulated phosphorus compounds, provided that DEA receives a properly 
completed application for registration on or before 30 days after DEA 
publishes a Final Rule finalizing these requirements in the Federal 
Register. The temporary exemption for such persons will remain in 
effect until DEA takes final action on their application for 
registration.
    The temporary exemption applies solely to the registration 
requirement; all other chemical control requirements, including 
recordkeeping and reporting, will remain in effect. Additionally, the 
temporary exemption does not suspend applicable federal criminal laws 
relating to the phosphorus compounds, nor does it supersede state or 
local laws or regulations. All handlers of these materials must comply 
with their state and local requirements in addition to the CSA and 
other federal regulatory controls.
    DEA notes that warehouses are exempt from the requirement of 
registration and may lawfully possess List I chemicals, if the 
possession of those chemicals is in the usual course of business (21 
U.S.C. 822(c)(2), 21 U.S.C. 957(b)(1)(B)). For purposes of this 
exemption, the warehouse must receive the List I chemical from a DEA 
registrant and shall only distribute the List I chemical back to the 
DEA registrant and registered location from which it was received. All 
other activities conducted by a warehouse do not fall under this 
exemption; a warehouse that distributes List I chemicals to persons 
other than the registrant and registered location from which they were 
obtained is conducting distribution activities and is required to 
register as such (21 U.S.C. 802(39)(A)(ii)).
    Records and Reports. The CSA (21 U.S.C. 830) requires that certain 
records be kept and reports be made that involve listed chemicals. 
Regulations describing recordkeeping and reporting requirements are set 
forth in 21 CFR part 1310. A record must be made and maintained for two 
years after the date of a transaction involving a listed chemical, 
provided the transaction is a regulated transaction.
    Each regulated bulk manufacturer of a regulated mixture shall 
submit manufacturing, inventory and use data on an annual basis (21 CFR 
1310.05(d)). Bulk manufacturers producing the mixture solely for 
internal consumption, e.g., formulating a non-regulated mixture, are 
not required to submit this information. Existing standard industry 
reports containing the required information are acceptable, provided 
the information is readily retrievable from the report.
    Title 21 CFR 1310.05 requires that each regulated person shall 
report to DEA any regulated transaction involving an extraordinary 
quantity of a listed chemical, an uncommon method of payment or 
delivery, or any other circumstance that the regulated person believes 
may indicate that the listed chemical will be used in violation of the 
CSA. Regulated persons are also required to report to DEA any proposed 
regulated transaction with a person whose description or other 
identifying information has been furnished to the regulated person. 
Finally, regulated persons are required to report any unusual or 
excessive loss or disappearance of a listed chemical.
    Import/Export. All imports/exports of a listed chemical shall 
comply with the CSA (21 U.S.C. 957 and 971). Regulations for 
importation and exportation of List I chemicals are described in 21 CFR 
part 1313. Separate registration is necessary for each activity (21 CFR 
1309.22).
    Security. All applicants and registrants shall provide effective 
controls against theft and diversion of chemicals as described in 21 
CFR 1309.71.
    Administrative Inspection. Places, including factories, warehouses, 
or other establishments and conveyances, where regulated persons may 
lawfully hold, manufacture, or distribute, dispense, administer, or 
otherwise dispose of a regulated chemical/chemical mixture, or where 
records relating to those activities are maintained, are controlled 
premises as defined in 21 CFR 1316.02(c). The CSA (21 U.S.C. 880) 
allows for administrative inspections of these controlled premises as 
provided in 21 CFR 1316 subpart A.
    The goal of this rulemaking is to deny traffickers access to 
regulated phosphorus compounds while minimizing the burden on 
legitimate industry. Persons who obtain a regulated chemical, but do 
not distribute the chemical, are end users. End users are not subject 
to CSA chemical regulatory control provisions such as registration or 
recordkeeping requirements. Some examples of end users are those who 
chemically react phosphorus compounds and change them into non-listed 
chemicals, formulate phosphorus compounds into exempt chemical mixtures 
or consume them in industrial processes.

Technical Revision to 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i)

    While preparing this rulemaking, DEA became aware that references 
to section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 971) were inadvertently omitted 
from 21 CFR 1310.12(a) and 1310.13(i). Therefore, DEA is proposing that 
this rulemaking amend these sections by adding this citation. This 
insertion is a clarification and does not alter the current treatment 
of exempt chemical mixtures under the CSA.
    As DEA discussed in its December 15, 2004, Final Rule (specifically 
69 FR 74963, comment 10) all chemical mixtures not exempt from CSA 
regulatory controls are subject to all aspects of those controls, 
including importation and exportation requirements. Thus, chemical 
mixtures that are exempt under 21 CFR 1310.12 and 1310.13 are also 
exempt from the requirements of Section 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 
971). The requirements of 21 U.S.C. 971 apply to ``each regulated 
person, who imports or exports a listed chemical.'' Since a person 
distributing an exempt chemical mixture is not a ``regulated person'' 
as defined by 21 U.S.C. 802(38), that person is exempt from the 
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 971.
    DEA notes that this is a technical correction only. All exempt 
chemical mixtures have been treated as such for import and export 
purposes, and all regulated mixtures have been treated as regulated 
transactions for import and export purposes. DEA is merely including a 
reference which was inadvertently omitted from this regulatory 
language.

Regulatory Certifications

Regulatory Flexibility and Small Business Concerns

    The Deputy Administrator hereby certifies that this rulemaking has 
been

[[Page 36311]]

drafted in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 
601-612). In the ANPRM, DEA sought information from manufacturers about 
the impact of setting concentration limits for chemical mixtures 
containing phosphorus. Only three companies, none small businesses, 
provided information. Some of the mixtures sold by one of the 
commenters would be subject to this proposed rule, but DEA could not 
determine whether any of the products that may be produced with those 
phosphorus mixtures would also be covered. DEA is, therefore, seeking 
comments on whether any of the products contain phosphorus would exceed 
the proposed concentration limits. DEA notes, however, that the cost of 
compliance with the rule is low and is unlikely to impose a significant 
cost on any manufacturing, distributing, importing, or exporting firm. 
The recordkeeping requirements can be met with standard business 
records; most firms maintain adequate security to meet DEA's 
regulations. The primary cost of compliance is the registration fee. 
For manufacturers, the registration fee is $2,293 annually; for 
distributors, importers, and exporters, the fee is $1,147 annually. 
These fees are substantially less than one percent of annual sales for 
manufacturers, distributors, importers, and exporters. Data from the 
2002 Economic Census indicate that small chemical manufacturers 
generally have sales well above $1 million; most small chemical 
distributors have sales above $250,000.

Executive Order 12866

    This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with 
Executive Order 12866, Section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. It has 
been determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' 
under Executive Order 12866, Section 3(f), Regulatory Planning and 
Review, and accordingly this rule has been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget. The information DEA received in response to the 
ANPRM indicates that few phosphorus mixtures will be subject to the 
regulation. Those mixtures appear to be produced by current DEA 
registrants on whom the rule will impose no new requirements. DEA is 
seeking comments on whether any firms purchasing covered mixtures are 
producing products that would themselves be subject to the rule.
    As stated earlier in this rulemaking the vast majority of the 
chemical mixtures that will become subject to this proposed rulemaking 
have large industrial uses. Regulated chemical mixtures are not items 
having common household uses. Although concerned about the diversion of 
matchbook striker plates, DEA determined that the regulation of 
matchbook striker plates is impractical and will create undue 
administrative burdens for both law enforcement and the regulated 
sector.
    Benefits. Phosphorus is a chemical important in the clandestine 
manufacture of methamphetamine and amphetamine. This rule seeks to 
eliminate the use of certain chemical mixtures whose high 
concentrations of phosphorus make them valued by traffickers seeking 
this chemical for their clandestine laboratory operations.
    Methamphetamine remains the primary drug produced in illicit 
laboratories within the U.S. Data from the El Paso Intelligence 
Center's (EPIC) Clandestine Laboratory Database indicates that there 
were more than 17,170 methamphetamine laboratory incidents in calendar 
year 2004; in 2005, as State laws began to limit sales of over-the-
counter medications containing primary ingredients used in the illicit 
manufacture of methamphetamine (ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and 
phenylpropanolamine), the number of incidents declined to 12,139. In 
2006, with both State and Federal controls coming into effect, the 
number of incidents fell significantly to 7,347, but that is still 
about 20 clandestine laboratory incidents a day.
    According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration (SAMHSA), Drug Abuse Warning Network, in 2003, the 
latest year for which data are available (since SAMHSA is currently 
amending 2004, 2005, and 2006 data), amphetamine and methamphetamine 
emergency department (ED) visits rose from 25,200 in 1995 to 38,960 in 
2002 and 42,500 in 2003 If the cost of the ED visit is $500, which is 
probably low in many areas, the total cost for 42,500 visits would have 
been $21.25 million for 2003.
    The surge in methamphetamine abuse and the manufacture of the drug 
in clandestine laboratories have caused serious law enforcement and 
environmental problems, particularly in rural communities. Rural areas 
are frequently the site of clandestine laboratories because the 
manufacturing process produces distinctive odors and can be identified 
if there are close neighbors. Besides causing crime as clandestine 
laboratory operators steal ingredients to make methamphetamine and 
steal to support their addiction, the clandestine laboratories often 
leave serious pollution behind. A laboratory can produce 6 to 10 pounds 
of hazardous waste for every pound of methamphetamine produced. As DEA 
noted in its Interim Final Rule implementing the retail sales 
requirements of the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005 (CMEA) 
(Title VII of Pub. L. 109-172), clean-up costs in Fiscal Year 2006 were 
more than $12 million (71 FR 56008, September 26, 2006).
    The Federal and State cleanups are generally limited to removing 
chemicals that could be reused; they do not address water and soil 
pollution that remains. Owners of the property are responsible for 
completing the cleanup of contaminated water and soil, but if the owner 
cannot pay the cost, either the local governments must bear the burden 
or the contamination remains.
    This rule is intended to continue the trend of reducing the number 
of clandestine laboratories. This trend will reduce the cost to State 
and local governments as well as the hazard to law enforcement officers 
and others from exposure to the toxic chemicals left behind.

Executive Order 12988

    This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in 
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice 
Reform.

Executive Order 13132

    This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of state 
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any state; nor 
does it diminish the power of any state to enforce its own laws. 
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications 
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

    This rule will not result in the expenditure by state, local, and 
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of 
$120,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will 
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no 
actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

Congressional Review Act

    This rule is not a major rule as defined by Section 804 of the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 
(Congressional Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual 
effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in cost 
or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, 
investment, productivity, innovation, or

[[Page 36312]]

on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with 
foreign-based companies in domestic and export markets.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This rule proposes that chemical mixtures containing 80 percent and 
less of red phosphorus or 30 percent and less of hypophosphorous acid 
or its salts are automatically exempt from CSA regulatory controls 
pertaining to chemicals and that no automatic exemption be established 
for chemical mixtures containing white phosphorus. Under this proposed 
method of automatic exemption, persons who handle these exempt chemical 
mixtures will not be subject to CSA regulatory controls, including the 
requirement to register with DEA, the requirement to report 
manufacturing activities to DEA annually, and the requirement to file 
importation and exportation advance notification and return declaration 
information with DEA. For persons handling regulated chemical mixtures, 
DEA anticipates granting some of these mixtures exempt status by the 
application process (21 CFR 1310.13).
    At this time, DEA lacks specific information regarding the 
potential impact of this regulation on the regulated industry. DEA does 
not believe that the impact will be significant, and has been unable to 
identify any chemical mixtures that are certain to be affected by this 
regulation. DEA also anticipates that some chemical mixtures would be 
granted exemptions based on the application process.
    DEA does not have reliable estimates regarding the number of 
persons who would be required to register as a result of the control of 
chemical mixtures containing regulated forms of phosphorus. Nor does 
DEA have accurate estimates regarding manufacturing, import and export 
activities involving chemicals mixtures addressed in this rulemaking. 
Responses to the previous Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking did not 
address this issue. Therefore, DEA is specifically seeking information 
regarding the number of persons affected, and the potential number of 
importation and exportation transactions that would be affected by this 
regulation. Therefore, DEA will revise three existing information 
collections related to the handling of chemical mixtures containing 
listed forms of phosphorus once it receives further information:
     ``Application for Registration under Domestic Chemical 
Diversion Control Act of 1993 and Renewal Application for Registration 
under Domestic Chemical Diversion Control Act of 1993'' [OMB 
information collection 1117-0031]
     ``Annual Reporting Requirement for Manufacturers of Listed 
Chemicals'' [OMB information collection 1117-0029]
     ``Import/Export Declaration for List I and List II 
Chemicals'' [OMB information collection 1117-0023]

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1310

    Drug traffic control, List I and List II chemicals, reporting 
requirements.
    For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR Part 1310 is proposed to be 
amended as follows:

PART 1310-- RECORDS AND REPORTS OF LISTED CHEMICALS AND CERTAIN 
MACHINES [AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 1310 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 802, 827(h), 830, 871(b), 890.
    2. Section 1310.09 is amended by revising paragraph (k) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  1310.09  Temporary Exemption From Registration.

* * * * *
    (k) Each person required by Sections 302 and 1007 of the Act (21 
U.S.C. 822 and 957) to obtain a registration to manufacture, 
distribute, import, or export regulated chemical mixtures which contain 
red phosphorus, white phosphorus, hypophosphorous acid (and its salts), 
pursuant to Sections 1310.12 and 1310.13, is temporarily exempted from 
the registration requirement, provided that DEA receives a properly 
completed application for registration or application for exemption on 
or before July 26, 2010. The exemption will remain in effect for each 
person who has made such application until the Administrator has 
approved or denied that application. This exemption applies only to 
registration; all other chemical control requirements set forth in 
parts 1309, 1310, and 1313 of this chapter remain in full force and 
effect. Any person who manufactures, distributes, imports, or exports a 
chemical mixture whose application for exemption is subsequently denied 
by DEA must obtain a registration with DEA. A temporary exemption from 
the registration requirement will also be provided for these persons, 
provided that DEA receives a properly completed application for 
registration on or before 30 days following the date of official DEA 
notification that the application for exemption has not been approved. 
The temporary exemption for such persons will remain in effect until 
DEA takes final action on their registration application.
    3. Section 1310.12 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and by 
amending the Table of Concentration Limits in paragraph (c) by adding 
entries for ``hypophosphorous acid and its salts'', ``red phosphorus'', 
and ``white phosphorus'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:


Sec.  1310.12  Exempt Chemical Mixtures.

    (a) The chemical mixtures meeting the criteria in paragraphs (c) or 
(d) of this Section are exempted by the Administrator from application 
of Sections 302, 303, 310, 1007, 1008, and 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 
822, 823, 830, 957, 958, and 971) to the extent described in paragraphs 
(b) and (c) of this Section.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *



                                          Table of Concentration Limits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         DEA chemical
           List I chemicals               code number    Concentration (percent)         Special conditions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Hypophosphorous acid and its salts....            6797  30% by weight if a solid,  The weight is determined by
                                                         weight or volume if a      measuring the mass of
                                                         liquid.                    hypophosphorous acid and its
                                                                                    salts in the mixture; the
                                                                                    concentration limit is
                                                                                    calculated by summing the
                                                                                    concentrations of all forms
                                                                                    of hypophosphorous acid and
                                                                                    its salts in the mixture.
                                                                                    The Administration does not
                                                                                    consider a chemical mixture
                                                                                    to mean the combination of a
                                                                                    listed chemical and an inert
                                                                                    carrier. Therefore, any
                                                                                    solution consisting of
                                                                                    hypophosphorous acid (and
                                                                                    its salts), dispersed in
                                                                                    water, alcohol, or another
                                                                                    inert carrier, is not
                                                                                    considered a chemical
                                                                                    mixture and is therefore
                                                                                    subject to chemical
                                                                                    regulatory controls at all
                                                                                    concentrations.

[[Page 36313]]

 
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
Red Phosphorus........................            6795  80% by weight............
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
White phosphorus......................            6796  Not exempt at any          Chemical mixtures containing
                                                         concentration.             any amount of white
                                                                                    phosphorus are not exempt
                                                                                    due to concentration, unless
                                                                                    otherwise exempted.
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
List II chemicals.....................
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    4. Section 1310.13 is amended by revising paragraph (e) and 
paragraph (i) introductory text to read as follows:


Sec.  1310.13  Exemption of chemical mixtures; application.

* * * * *
    (e) Within a reasonable period of time after the receipt of an 
application for an exemption under this section, the Administrator will 
notify the applicant in writing of the acceptance or rejection of the 
application for filing. If the application is not accepted for filing, 
an explanation will be provided. The Administrator is not required to 
accept an application if any information required pursuant to paragraph 
(c) of this section or requested pursuant to paragraph (d) of this 
section is lacking or not readily understood. The applicant may, 
however, amend the application to meet the requirements of paragraphs 
(c) and (d) of this section. If the exemption is subsequently granted, 
the applicant shall again be notified in writing and the Administrator 
shall issue, and publish in the Federal Register, an order on the 
application. This order shall specify the date on which it shall take 
effect. The Administrator shall permit any interested person to file 
written comments on or objections to the order. If any comments or 
objections raise significant issues regarding any findings of fact or 
conclusions of law upon which the order is based, the Administrator may 
suspend the effectiveness of the order until he has reconsidered the 
application in light of the comments and objections filed. Thereafter, 
the Administrator shall reinstate, terminate, or amend the original 
order as deemed appropriate.
* * * * *
    (i) The following chemical mixtures, in the form and quantity 
listed in the application submitted (indicated as the ``date'') are 
designated as exempt chemical mixtures for the purposes set forth in 
this section and are exempted by the Administrator from application of 
Sections 302, 303, 310, 1007, 1008, and 1018 of the Act (21 U.S.C. 822, 
823, 830, 957, 958, and 971):
* * * * *

    Dated: June 16, 2010.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-15160 Filed 6-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.