Safety Zone; Fireworks Display in Stevenson, WA, 35968-35970 [2010-15274]

Agencies

• Coast Guard
• DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 121 (Thursday, June 24, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35968-35970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15274]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0332]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Fireworks Display in Stevenson, WA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone 
covering the waters of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Stevenson, 
Washington. The safety zone is necessary to help ensure the safety of 
the maritime public during the fireworks display and will do so by 
prohibiting all persons and vessels from

[[Page 35969]]

entering the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port 
or his designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 4, 
2010.

DATES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the 
docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0332 and are available online by 
going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0332 in the 
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available 
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), 
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room 
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management 
Division, Sector Portland, Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-9319, e-mail 
D13-SG-SecPortlandWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the 
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 
telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because it is contrary to the public interest 
to delay the effective date of this rule. Delaying the effective date 
by first publishing an NPRM would be contrary to the safety zone's 
intended objective since immediate action is needed to protect person's 
and vessels against the hazards associated with fireworks displays on 
navigable waters. Such hazards include premature detonations, dangerous 
detonations, dangerous projectiles and falling or burning debris. 
Additionally, the zone should have negligible impact on vessel transits 
due to the fact that vessels will be limited from the area for only 
three hours. Accordingly, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard 
finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after 
publication in the Federal Register because due to the need for 
immediate action, the restriction of vessel traffic is necessary to 
protect life, property and the environment; therefore, a 30-day notice 
is impracticable. Delaying the effective date would be contrary to the 
safety zone's intended objectives of protecting persons and vessels 
involved in the event, and enhancing public and maritime safety.

Basis and Purpose

    Fireworks displays create a hazardous condition for the maritime 
public because of the large number of vessels that congregate near the 
displays as well as the noise, falling debris, and explosions that 
occur during the event. The establishment of a safety zone around the 
display helps to ensure the safety of the maritime public by 
prohibiting all persons and vessels from coming too close to the 
fireworks display and the associated hazards.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on 
specified waters of the Columbia River in the vicinity of Stevenson, 
Washington. Specifically, the safety zone would include all waters 
within an area whose boundary is defined by connecting the following 
points: starting from the shore at 45[deg]41'26.70'' N/
121[deg]53'36.80'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'24.62'' N/
121[deg]53'40.85'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'18.10'' N/
121[deg]53'27.86'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41' 25.32'' N/
121[deg]53'19.42'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg] 41'30.32'' N/
121[deg]53'27.14'' W; thence continuing back to the starting point at 
45[deg]41'26.70'' N/121[deg]53'36.80'' W. All persons and vessels will 
be prohibited from entering the safety zone unless authorized by the 
Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order. Although this temporary rule restricts 
access to the safety zone, the effect of the rule will not be 
significant because: (i) The safety zone will only be in effect for 
three hours on one day, and (ii) the zone is of a limited size.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities because the zone will be in effect for only be in effect for 
three hours on one day. This rule may affect the following entities 
some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels 
wishing to transit or anchor in that portion of the Columbia River 
between 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. on July 4, 2010.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

[[Page 35970]]

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not 
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of 
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone. 
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion 
determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-143 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T13-143  Safety Zone; Fireworks Display in Stevenson, WA

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all waters 
within an area whose boundary is defined by connecting the following 
points: starting from the shore at 45[deg]41'26.70'' N/
121[deg]53'36.80'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'24.62'' N/
121[deg]53'40.85'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'18.10'' N/
121[deg]53'27.86'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'25.32'' N/
121[deg]53'19.42'' W; thence continuing to 45[deg]41'30.32'' N/
121[deg]53'27.14'' W; thence continuing back to the starting point at 
45[deg]41'26.70'' N/121[deg]53'36.80'' W.
    (b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, no person or vessel may enter or remain in 
the safety zone created by paragraph (a) of this section without the 
permission of the Captain of the Port, Sector Portland or his 
designated representative.
    (c) Enforcement Period. The safety zone created in paragraph (a) of 
this section will be in effect from 8 p.m. until 11 p.m. on July 4, 
2010.

    Dated: May 14, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010-15274 Filed 6-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P