Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Information Request for Pulp and Paper Sector New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review; EPA ICR No. 2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060-NEW, 35792-35795 [2010-15221]
Download as PDF
35792
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
increase in fuel cost that is expected to
occur. Therefore, the lump-sum
payment from the SWPA should be
factored-up to offset the effect of income
taxes to ensure that Empire is
adequately compensated for the
increased fuel cost that Empire expects
to experience as a result of the White
River Minimum Flows project.’’
Response: Do not concur. See
previous response.
3. Comment. ‘‘SWPA should increase
the lump-sum payment it determines is
appropriate, based on the other
variables, by factoring-up the amount
for income taxes. This calculation will
offset the loss of funds, as a result of
income taxes, and ensure that Empire
receives adequate compensation for the
increased fuel cost that it expects to
incur as a result of the White River
Minimum Flows project.
Response: Do not concur. See
response to Comment 1.
4. Comment. ‘‘SWPA should increase
the lump-sum payment it determines is
appropriate, based on the other
variables, by multiplying the amount by
a tax factor. As of today, I have not been
able to determine what this factor
should be. My point is that there should
definitely be a calculation to off-set the
loss of funds available for investment, as
a result of the income taxes in the year
Empire receives the lump-sum payment,
and ensure that Empire receives
adequate compensation for the
increased fuel cost that it expects to
incur as a result of the White River
Minimum Flows project.’’
Response: Do not concur. See
response to Comment 1.
H. Lack of Consultation by
Southwestern
1. Comment. The non-Federal
licensee commented, ‘‘Section 132 of the
Energy and Water Development
Appropriations Act, 2006 states ‘The
Administrator of the Southwestern
Power Administration, in consultation
with the project licensee and the
relevant state public utility
commissions, shall determine any
impacts on electric energy and capacity
generated at Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Project No. 2221 caused by
the storage reallocation of Bull Shoals
Lake, based on data and
recommendations provided by the
relevant state public utility
commissions.’ To Empire’s knowledge,
despite the fact Empire feels there was
constructive dialogue during the
development of the initial January 22,
2009 Final Determination, no
consultation occurred between the Final
Determination and the Draft Addendum
to the Final Determination. Empire
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
stands ready to discuss any of our
comments with SWPA before the
Addendum to the Final Determination
is finalized.’’
Response: Southwestern consulted
with the non-Federal licensee and the
MoPSC in a September 28, 2009,
meeting to discuss their comments and
concerns with Southwestern’s June 2009
Draft Addendum. Southwestern
subsequently consulted with the nonFederal licensee and the MoPSC in
developing a source for REC prices to be
utilized in the final compensation
calculations.
[FR Doc. 2010–15227 Filed 6–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–0544; FRL–9167–3]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Information
Request for Pulp and Paper Sector
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) and National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP) Residual Risk and
Technology Review; EPA ICR No.
2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060–
NEW
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this action announces that
the EPA is planning to submit a request
for a new Information Collection
Request to the Office of Management
and Budget. This is a request for a new
collection. Before submitting the
Information Collection Request to the
Office of Management and Budget for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on the proposed information
collection as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2007–0544, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov
• Fax: (202) 566–1741
• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 22821T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation
Docket and Information Center, U.S.
EPA, Room 3334, EPA West Building,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–
0544. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available on-line at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill
Schrock, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, (E143–03),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711; telephone number: (919) 541–
5032; fax number: (919) 541–3470; email address: schrock.bill@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How can I access the docket and/or
submit comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for this Information Collection Request
(ICR) under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2007–0544, which is available for
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices
on-line viewing at www.regulations.gov,
or in person viewing at the Air and
Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is 202–
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the Air and Radiation Docket is 202–
566–1742.
Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a
copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the docket ID number identified in this
document.
What information is EPA particularly
interested in?
Pursuant to Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) section 3506(c)(2)(A), EPA
specifically solicits comments and
information to enable it to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology (e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
What should I consider when I prepare
my comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date
and Federal Register citation.
35793
ICR numbers: EPA ICR Number
2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060–
NEW.
ICR status: This ICR is for a new
information collection activity. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the Code
What information collection activity or of Federal Regulations (CFR), after
ICR does this apply to?
appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9,
Affected entities: Respondents
are displayed either by publication in
affected by this action are owners/
the Federal Register or by other
operators of mills that are major
appropriate means, such as on the
sources 1 of Hazardous Air Pollutant
related collection instrument or form, if
(HAP) emissions and produce pulp,
applicable. The display of OMB control
perform bleaching or manufacture paper
numbers in certain EPA regulations is
or paperboard products, including:
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
• Mills that carry out chemical wood
Abstract: This ICR is being conducted
pulping (kraft, sulfite, soda or semiby EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation to
chemical),
assist the EPA Administrator, as
• Mills that carry out mechanical,
required by sections 111(b), 112(d), and
groundwood, secondary fiber and non112(f)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as
wood pulping,
amended, to determine the current
• Mills that perform bleaching, and
affected population of pulp and paper
processes and to re-evaluate emission
• Mills that manufacture paper or
standards for this source category. This
paperboard products.
one-time collection will solicit
Some mills perform multiple
information under authority of CAA
operations (e.g., chemical pulping,
section 114. The EPA intends to provide
bleaching, and papermaking; pulping
the survey in electronic format. The
and unbleached papermaking; etc.).
survey will be sent to all facilities
Mills that only purchase pre-consumer
identified as being pulp and/or paper
paper or paperboard products and
production facilities through
convert them into other products (i.e.,
information available to the Agency.
converting operations) are not affected
EPA envisions allowing recipients 60
by this action. The North American
days to respond to the survey. NonIndustry Classification System (NAICS)
confidential information from this ICR
codes for respondents affected by the
would be made available to the public.
information collection are listed in the
EPA estimates the total cost of the
following table.
information collection (for 386
NAICS respondents) will be 127,906 hours and
Category
Description
$12,100,453, which includes $2,316 in
Code
operation and maintenance (O&M) costs
Industry ..... Pulp Mills ...................
32211 for mailing survey responses to EPA.
Paper Mills .................
32212
The pulp and paper production
Paperboard Mills ........
32213 source category includes any facility
engaged in the production of pulp and/
Title: Information Collection Request
or paper. This category includes, but is
for Pulp and Paper Sector New Source
not limited to, integrated mills (where
Performance Standards (NSPS) and
pulp alone or pulp and paper or
National Emission Standards for
paperboard are manufactured on-site),
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
non-integrated mills (where paper or
Residual Risk and Technology Review
paperboard are manufactured, but no
(RTR).
pulp is manufactured on-site), and
secondary fiber mills (where waste
1 As defined in 40 CFR 63.2, ‘‘Major source’’
paper is used as the primary raw
means any stationary source or group of stationary
material). The pulp and paper
sources located within a contiguous area and under
production process units include
common control that emits or has the potential to
operations such as pulping, bleaching,
emit considering controls, in the aggregate, 10 tons
per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant or
chemical recovery and papermaking.
25 tons per year or more of any combination of
Different pulping processes are used,
hazardous air pollutants, unless the Administrator
including chemical processes (kraft,
establishes a lesser quantity, or in the case of
radionuclides, different criteria from those specified soda, sulfite and semi-chemical) and
in this sentence.
mechanical, secondary fiber or non-
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
35794
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices
wood processes. The three federal
emission standards that are the subject
of this information collection include:
1. Standards of Performance for Kraft
Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 60, subpart BB),
2. National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Pulp
and Paper Industry (40 CFR part 63,
subpart S), and
3. National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Chemical
Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft,
Soda, Sulfite, and Stand-Alone Semichemical Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MM).
The Standards of Performance (i.e.,
the NSPS) currently regulates
particulate matter (PM) and total
reduced sulfur emissions from kraft
pulping processes. In general, NESHAP
subpart S covers HAP emissions from
the pulp production areas (e.g., pulping
system vents, pulping process
condensates) at chemical, mechanical,
secondary fiber and non-wood pulp
mills; bleaching operations; and
papermaking systems. The subpart S
standards include several alternative
emission limits for each covered process
that are designed to provide flexibility
and promote and encourage the use of
new technology, particularly combined
air/water controls and pollution
prevention technologies. The NESHAP
subpart MM regulates HAP emissions
from the chemical recovery combustion
areas of chemical pulp mills (kraft,
sulfite, semi-chemical and soda wood
pulping processes). For existing kraft
and soda combustion units, the subpart
MM standards also include a
compliance alternative that allows
netting of PM emissions for the entire
chemical recovery system.
Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA
mandates that EPA review and, if
appropriate, revise existing NSPS at
least every eight years. The NSPS for
kraft pulp mills was promulgated in
1978 and reviewed in 1986. Another
review of the kraft pulp mill NSPS is
required under the CAA. Similarly,
Section 112(f)(2) of the CAA directs EPA
to conduct risk assessments on each
source category subject to maximum
achievable control technology (MACT)
standards and determine if additional
standards are needed to reduce residual
risks. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk
review is to be done eight years after
promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the
CAA requires EPA to review and revise
the MACT standards, as necessary,
taking into account developments in
practices, processes and control
technologies. The section 112(d)(6)
technology review is to be done at least
every eight years. The NESHAP for the
pulp and paper industry (40 CFR part
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
63, subpart S) was promulgated in 1998
and is due for review under CAA
sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6).
Likewise, the NESHAP for chemical
recovery combustion sources at kraft,
soda, sulfite and stand-alone semichemical pulp mills (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MM) was promulgated in 2001
and is also due for review. In addition
to the CAA-required reviews, recent
case law and legal petitions suggest the
need to review the pulp and paper
NESHAP. For example, the EPA
received a petition for rulemaking in
January 2009 requesting that EPA revise
various NESHAP, including the
NESHAP for chemical recovery
combustion sources at pulp mills, to
make the NESHAP consistent with CAA
precedent established in recent judicial
rulings. Also, in December 2008, the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
vacated the startup, shutdown, and
malfunction provisions contained in the
NESHAP General Provisions that apply
to pulp and paper mills. To the extent
that these legal actions need to be
addressed in the pulp and paper
NESHAP, EPA intends to investigate
potential rule revisions at the same time
as the CAA statutory reviews are
conducted.
The data used as the basis for the
originally promulgated NESHAP are
over 15 years old, and data used to
review the NSPS are over 20 years old.
The Agency is aware that significant
changes have been made in the
intervening years in the number of
affected facilities, in industry ownership
practices and in emission collection and
control configurations. Further, in light
of the statutory requirements for
reviewing emission standards under
CAA sections 111(b) and 112 and the
recent case law interpreting those
requirements, the Agency has
concluded that obtaining updated
information will be crucial to informing
its decisions on the NSPS and NESHAP
for pulp and paper manufacturing
sources.
The EPA has already begun
assembling data for a preliminary
residual risk assessment for the pulp
and paper NESHAP subparts S and MM.
Data sets derived from the EPA’s 2005
National Scale Air Toxics Assessment
(NATA) National Emissions Inventory
(NEI) will be used for the RTR.
Additional mill-specific information
would allow EPA to better characterize
emission sources, refine the risk
analysis and to address any
unacceptable residual risk that remains.
An update of the 2005 NATA NEI data
sets and more specific information
needed for rulemaking regulatory
analyses would be derived from the ICR.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Information collected directly from pulp
and paper mills will have the greatest
practical utility for purposes of
performing the RTR and NSPS reviews
as information from the affected
industry will contain the most up-todate, accurate and reliable equipment
and operational data for each mill.
CAA section 114(a) states that the
Administrator may require any owner or
operator subject to any requirement of
this Act to:
(A) Establish and maintain such records;
(B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and
maintain such monitoring equipment, and
use such audit procedures, or methods; (D)
sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such
locations, at such intervals, during such
periods, and in such manner as the
Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep
records on control equipment parameters,
production variables or other indirect data
when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance
certifications in accordance with section
114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other
information as the Administrator may
reasonably require.
At present, the EPA does not have a
database reflecting the post-MACT and
post-effluent guidelines configurations
of pulp and paper emission units and
air pollution control systems. It is
essential for the EPA to have updated
information to use in the regulatory
analyses required under CAA sections
112(d) and 112(f)(2). In addition, this
updated information will be used to
perform the NSPS review required
under CAA section 111(b). By
conducting all of the CAA-required
reviews at the same time (i.e., the
subpart S and MM RTR reviews and the
subpart BB NSPS review), the Agency
can make use of a single collection of
information that would allow the
Agency to consider control strategies
that are the most effective for both HAP
and criteria air pollutants (such as PM,
SO2, and NOX) that are regulated under
NSPS. The data would also allow the
Agency to evaluate compliance options
for startup and shutdown periods, and
to consider ways to consolidate
monitoring, reporting and
recordkeeping requirements among the
different rules under review.
The data collected will be used to
update facility information and
equipment configuration, develop new
estimates of the population of affected
units, and identify the control measures
and alternative emission limits being
used for compliance with the existing
rules that are under review. This
information, along with existing
permitted emission limits, will be used
to establish a baseline for purposes of
the regulatory reviews. The emissions
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 23, 2010 / Notices
test data (test reports and Continuous
Emissions Monitoring Systems (CEMS)
data) collected will be used to verify the
performance of existing control
measures, examine variability in
emissions, evaluate emission limits, and
to determine the performance of
superior control measures considered
for purposes of reducing residual risk or
as options for best demonstrated
technology under the NSPS review.
Emissions data will also be used along
with process and emission unit details
to consider subcategories for further
regulation and to estimate the
environmental and cost impacts
associated with any regulatory options
considered.
This collection of information is
mandatory under CAA section 114 (42
U.S.C. 7414). All information submitted
to EPA pursuant to this ICR for which
a claim of confidentiality is made is
safeguarded according to Agency
policies in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Office of Management and
Budget control numbers for EPA’s
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40
CFR part 9.
The EPA would like to solicit
comments to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology (e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Burden Statement: The projected cost
and hour burden for industry for this
one-time collection of information is
$12,098,137 and 127,906 hours. This
burden is based on an estimated 386
respondents to the survey. This ICR
does not include any requirements that
would cause the respondents to incur
either capital or start-up costs.
Operation and maintenance costs of
$2,316 are estimated for postage to mail
in the survey response to EPA. Burden
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 22, 2010
Jkt 220001
means the total time, effort or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain or disclose or
provide information to, or for a federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating and verifying information,
processing and maintaining information
and disclosing and providing
information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which
have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a
collection of information; search data
sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit
or otherwise disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 386 facilities.
Frequency of response: One time.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 1.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
127,906.
Estimated total annual costs:
$12,100,453. This includes an estimated
burden cost of 12,098,137 and an
estimated cost of $2,316 for capital
investment or maintenance and
operational costs.
What is the next step in the process for
this ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Steve Fruh,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs
Division.
[FR Doc. 2010–15221 Filed 6–22–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35795
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0982; FRL–9167–2]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Information Requirements for
Importation of Nonconforming
Vehicles (Renewal); EPA ICR No.
0010.12, OMB Control No. 2060–0095
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR,
which is abstracted below, describes the
nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.
DATES: Additional comments may be
submitted on or before July 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2009–0982, to (1) EPA online
using https://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air and Radiation
Docket, Mailcode 6102T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to:
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer
for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Good, Compliance and Innovative
Strategies Division, Office of
Transportation and Air Quality,
Environmental Protection Agency, 2000
Traverwood, Ann Arbor, Michigan
48105; telephone number: 734–214–
4450; fax number: 734–214–4869; e-mail
address: good.david@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
submitted the following ICR to OMB for
review and approval according to the
procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12.
On January 22, 2010 (75 FR 3724), EPA
sought comments on this ICR pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no
comments during the comment period.
Any additional comments on this ICR
should be submitted to EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OAR–2009–0982, which is
E:\FR\FM\23JNN1.SGM
23JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35792-35795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-15221]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544; FRL-9167-3]
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Information Request for Pulp and Paper Sector New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review;
EPA ICR No. 2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060-NEW
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this action announces that the EPA is planning to submit a
request for a new Information Collection Request to the Office of
Management and Budget. This is a request for a new collection. Before
submitting the Information Collection Request to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and approval, EPA is soliciting
comments on the proposed information collection as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 23, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2007-0544, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov
Fax: (202) 566-1741
Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 22821T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, U.S. EPA, Room 3334, EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Docket's normal hours of operation and special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0544. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available on-line
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Schrock, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, (E143-03), Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-5032; fax number: (919) 541-3470; e-mail address:
schrock.bill@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?
EPA has established a public docket for this Information Collection
Request (ICR) under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544, which is
available for
[[Page 35793]]
on-line viewing at www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Air
and Radiation Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is
202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket
is 202-566-1742.
Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the
public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this
document.
What information is EPA particularly interested in?
Pursuant to Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) section 3506(c)(2)(A),
EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date and Federal
Register citation.
What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?
Affected entities: Respondents affected by this action are owners/
operators of mills that are major sources \1\ of Hazardous Air
Pollutant (HAP) emissions and produce pulp, perform bleaching or
manufacture paper or paperboard products, including:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ As defined in 40 CFR 63.2, ``Major source'' means any
stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a
contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the
potential to emit considering controls, in the aggregate, 10 tons
per year or more of any hazardous air pollutant or 25 tons per year
or more of any combination of hazardous air pollutants, unless the
Administrator establishes a lesser quantity, or in the case of
radionuclides, different criteria from those specified in this
sentence.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mills that carry out chemical wood pulping (kraft,
sulfite, soda or semi-chemical),
Mills that carry out mechanical, groundwood, secondary
fiber and non-wood pulping,
Mills that perform bleaching, and
Mills that manufacture paper or paperboard products.
Some mills perform multiple operations (e.g., chemical pulping,
bleaching, and papermaking; pulping and unbleached papermaking; etc.).
Mills that only purchase pre-consumer paper or paperboard products and
convert them into other products (i.e., converting operations) are not
affected by this action. The North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) codes for respondents affected by the information
collection are listed in the following table.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS
Category Description Code
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry............................. Pulp Mills.............. 32211
Paper Mills............. 32212
Paperboard Mills........ 32213
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title: Information Collection Request for Pulp and Paper Sector New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review
(RTR).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR Number 2393.01, OMB Control Number 2060-NEW.
ICR status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB
control numbers for EPA's regulations in title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: This ICR is being conducted by EPA's Office of Air and
Radiation to assist the EPA Administrator, as required by sections
111(b), 112(d), and 112(f)(6) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended,
to determine the current affected population of pulp and paper
processes and to re-evaluate emission standards for this source
category. This one-time collection will solicit information under
authority of CAA section 114. The EPA intends to provide the survey in
electronic format. The survey will be sent to all facilities identified
as being pulp and/or paper production facilities through information
available to the Agency. EPA envisions allowing recipients 60 days to
respond to the survey. Non-confidential information from this ICR would
be made available to the public. EPA estimates the total cost of the
information collection (for 386 respondents) will be 127,906 hours and
$12,100,453, which includes $2,316 in operation and maintenance (O&M)
costs for mailing survey responses to EPA.
The pulp and paper production source category includes any facility
engaged in the production of pulp and/or paper. This category includes,
but is not limited to, integrated mills (where pulp alone or pulp and
paper or paperboard are manufactured on-site), non-integrated mills
(where paper or paperboard are manufactured, but no pulp is
manufactured on-site), and secondary fiber mills (where waste paper is
used as the primary raw material). The pulp and paper production
process units include operations such as pulping, bleaching, chemical
recovery and papermaking. Different pulping processes are used,
including chemical processes (kraft, soda, sulfite and semi-chemical)
and mechanical, secondary fiber or non-
[[Page 35794]]
wood processes. The three federal emission standards that are the
subject of this information collection include:
1. Standards of Performance for Kraft Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 60,
subpart BB),
2. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from
the Pulp and Paper Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S), and
3. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Chemical Recovery Combustion Sources at Kraft, Soda, Sulfite, and
Stand-Alone Semi-chemical Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 63, subpart MM).
The Standards of Performance (i.e., the NSPS) currently regulates
particulate matter (PM) and total reduced sulfur emissions from kraft
pulping processes. In general, NESHAP subpart S covers HAP emissions
from the pulp production areas (e.g., pulping system vents, pulping
process condensates) at chemical, mechanical, secondary fiber and non-
wood pulp mills; bleaching operations; and papermaking systems. The
subpart S standards include several alternative emission limits for
each covered process that are designed to provide flexibility and
promote and encourage the use of new technology, particularly combined
air/water controls and pollution prevention technologies. The NESHAP
subpart MM regulates HAP emissions from the chemical recovery
combustion areas of chemical pulp mills (kraft, sulfite, semi-chemical
and soda wood pulping processes). For existing kraft and soda
combustion units, the subpart MM standards also include a compliance
alternative that allows netting of PM emissions for the entire chemical
recovery system.
Section 111(b)(1)(B) of the CAA mandates that EPA review and, if
appropriate, revise existing NSPS at least every eight years. The NSPS
for kraft pulp mills was promulgated in 1978 and reviewed in 1986.
Another review of the kraft pulp mill NSPS is required under the CAA.
Similarly, Section 112(f)(2) of the CAA directs EPA to conduct risk
assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable
control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional
standards are needed to reduce residual risks. The section 112(f)(2)
residual risk review is to be done eight years after promulgation.
Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT
standards, as necessary, taking into account developments in practices,
processes and control technologies. The section 112(d)(6) technology
review is to be done at least every eight years. The NESHAP for the
pulp and paper industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S) was promulgated in
1998 and is due for review under CAA sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6).
Likewise, the NESHAP for chemical recovery combustion sources at kraft,
soda, sulfite and stand-alone semi-chemical pulp mills (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MM) was promulgated in 2001 and is also due for review. In
addition to the CAA-required reviews, recent case law and legal
petitions suggest the need to review the pulp and paper NESHAP. For
example, the EPA received a petition for rulemaking in January 2009
requesting that EPA revise various NESHAP, including the NESHAP for
chemical recovery combustion sources at pulp mills, to make the NESHAP
consistent with CAA precedent established in recent judicial rulings.
Also, in December 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit
vacated the startup, shutdown, and malfunction provisions contained in
the NESHAP General Provisions that apply to pulp and paper mills. To
the extent that these legal actions need to be addressed in the pulp
and paper NESHAP, EPA intends to investigate potential rule revisions
at the same time as the CAA statutory reviews are conducted.
The data used as the basis for the originally promulgated NESHAP
are over 15 years old, and data used to review the NSPS are over 20
years old. The Agency is aware that significant changes have been made
in the intervening years in the number of affected facilities, in
industry ownership practices and in emission collection and control
configurations. Further, in light of the statutory requirements for
reviewing emission standards under CAA sections 111(b) and 112 and the
recent case law interpreting those requirements, the Agency has
concluded that obtaining updated information will be crucial to
informing its decisions on the NSPS and NESHAP for pulp and paper
manufacturing sources.
The EPA has already begun assembling data for a preliminary
residual risk assessment for the pulp and paper NESHAP subparts S and
MM. Data sets derived from the EPA's 2005 National Scale Air Toxics
Assessment (NATA) National Emissions Inventory (NEI) will be used for
the RTR. Additional mill-specific information would allow EPA to better
characterize emission sources, refine the risk analysis and to address
any unacceptable residual risk that remains. An update of the 2005 NATA
NEI data sets and more specific information needed for rulemaking
regulatory analyses would be derived from the ICR. Information
collected directly from pulp and paper mills will have the greatest
practical utility for purposes of performing the RTR and NSPS reviews
as information from the affected industry will contain the most up-to-
date, accurate and reliable equipment and operational data for each
mill.
CAA section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any
owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:
(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;
(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use
such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in
accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at
such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the
Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control
equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data
when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit
compliance certifications in accordance with section 114(a)(3); and
(G) provide such other information as the Administrator may
reasonably require.
At present, the EPA does not have a database reflecting the post-
MACT and post-effluent guidelines configurations of pulp and paper
emission units and air pollution control systems. It is essential for
the EPA to have updated information to use in the regulatory analyses
required under CAA sections 112(d) and 112(f)(2). In addition, this
updated information will be used to perform the NSPS review required
under CAA section 111(b). By conducting all of the CAA-required reviews
at the same time (i.e., the subpart S and MM RTR reviews and the
subpart BB NSPS review), the Agency can make use of a single collection
of information that would allow the Agency to consider control
strategies that are the most effective for both HAP and criteria air
pollutants (such as PM, SO2, and NOX) that are
regulated under NSPS. The data would also allow the Agency to evaluate
compliance options for startup and shutdown periods, and to consider
ways to consolidate monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping
requirements among the different rules under review.
The data collected will be used to update facility information and
equipment configuration, develop new estimates of the population of
affected units, and identify the control measures and alternative
emission limits being used for compliance with the existing rules that
are under review. This information, along with existing permitted
emission limits, will be used to establish a baseline for purposes of
the regulatory reviews. The emissions
[[Page 35795]]
test data (test reports and Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems
(CEMS) data) collected will be used to verify the performance of
existing control measures, examine variability in emissions, evaluate
emission limits, and to determine the performance of superior control
measures considered for purposes of reducing residual risk or as
options for best demonstrated technology under the NSPS review.
Emissions data will also be used along with process and emission unit
details to consider subcategories for further regulation and to
estimate the environmental and cost impacts associated with any
regulatory options considered.
This collection of information is mandatory under CAA section 114
(42 U.S.C. 7414). All information submitted to EPA pursuant to this ICR
for which a claim of confidentiality is made is safeguarded according
to Agency policies in 40 CFR part 2, subpart B. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Office of Management and Budget control numbers for
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
The EPA would like to solicit comments to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the methodology
and assumptions used;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology (e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Burden Statement: The projected cost and hour burden for industry
for this one-time collection of information is $12,098,137 and 127,906
hours. This burden is based on an estimated 386 respondents to the
survey. This ICR does not include any requirements that would cause the
respondents to incur either capital or start-up costs. Operation and
maintenance costs of $2,316 are estimated for postage to mail in the
survey response to EPA. Burden means the total time, effort or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain
or disclose or provide information to, or for a federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here.
Estimated total number of potential respondents: 386 facilities.
Frequency of response: One time.
Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.
Estimated total annual burden hours: 127,906.
Estimated total annual costs: $12,100,453. This includes an
estimated burden cost of 12,098,137 and an estimated cost of $2,316 for
capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
What is the next step in the process for this ICR?
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Steve Fruh,
Acting Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-15221 Filed 6-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P