Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band; New 800 MHz Band Plan for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, 35363-35366 [2010-14994]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to
determine that the Sandpoint
nonattainment area in Idaho attains the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter of less than or
equal to a nominal ten micrometers
(PM10).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R10–
OAR–2010–0294, by any of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: body.steve@epa.gov.
• Mail: Steve Body, U.S. EPA Region
10, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics
(AWT–107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite
900, Seattle, WA 98101.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: U.S. EPA,
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite
900, Seattle, WA 98101. Attention: Steve
Body, Office of Air, Waste and Toxics,
AWT–107. Such deliveries are only
accepted during normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Please see the direct final rule which
is located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register for detailed
instructions on how to submit
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Body at telephone number: (206)
553–0782, e-mail address:
body.steve@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
For further information, please see the
direct final action, of the same title,
which is located in the Rules section of
this Federal Register. EPA is approving
the attainment determination as a direct
final rule without prior proposal
because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipates
no adverse comments. A detailed
rationale for the approval is set forth in
the preamble to the direct final rule. If
EPA receives no adverse comments,
EPA will not take further action on this
proposed rule.
If EPA receives adverse comments,
EPA will withdraw the direct final rule
and it will not take effect. EPA will
address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in commenting
on this action should do so at this time.
Please note that if we receive adverse
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
Dated: May 28, 2010.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2010–14894 Filed 6–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 02–55; DA 10–695]
Improving Public Safety
Communications in the 800 MHz Band;
New 800 MHz Band Plan for Puerto
Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rules.
SUMMARY: This document summarizes
the Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking portion of the Third Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, which portion
seeks comment on adopting a new 800
MHz band plan for the U.S. Virgin
Islands.
Comments are due July 22, 2010.
Comments may be filed
using: (1) The Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the
Federal Government’s eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See
Electronic Filing of Documents in
Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121
(1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the Internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/or the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Filers should follow the instructions
provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. If more than
one docket or rulemaking number
appears in the caption of this
proceeding, filers must submit two
additional copies for each additional
docket or rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although we continue to experience
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35363
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service
mail). All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St., SW., Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building. Commercial
overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal
Service Express Mail and Priority Mail)
must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743. U.S.
Postal Service first-class, Express, and
Priority mail must be addressed to 445
12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format),
send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (tty).
• Parties should send a copy of their
filings to John Evanoff, Policy Division,
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, Room 7–B550, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, or
by e-mail to john.evanoff@fcc.gov.
Parties shall also serve one copy with
the Commission’s copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals
II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488–5300,
or via e-mail to fcc@bcpiweb.com.
• Documents in WT Docket No. 02–
55 will be available for public
inspection and copying during business
hours at the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
The documents may also be purchased
from BCPI, telephone (202) 488–5300,
facsimile (202) 488–5563, TTY (202)
488–5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Evanoff, Policy Division, Public Safety
and Homeland Security Bureau, (202)
418–0848.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Third Further Notice of
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
35364
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed Rulemaking portion of the
Commission’s Third Report and Order
and Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rule Making, DA 10–695, released on
April 26, 2010. This summary should be
read in conjunction with its companion
document, the summary of the Third
Report and Order portion of the Third
Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rule Making,
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register. The complete text of
the document is available for inspection
and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Information
Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554.
This document may also be purchased
from the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.,
445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800)
378–3160 or (202) 863–2893, facsimile
(202) 863–2898, or via e-mail at https://
www.bcpiweb.com. It is also available
on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.fcc.gov.
Synopsis of the Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
In a July 2004 Report and Order, the
Commission reconfigured the 800 MHz
band to eliminate interference to public
safety and other land mobile
communication systems operating in the
band, 69 FR 67823, November 22, 2004.
In a Second Memorandum Opinion and
Order, adopted in May 2007, the
Commission determined that an
alternative band plan was appropriate
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
(Puerto Rico) due to the unique nature
of 800 MHz incumbency in the Puerto
Rico market compared to other markets,
72 FR 39756, July 20, 2007. Rather than
specify a band plan for Puerto Rico, the
Commission directed the 800 MHz
Transition Administrator (TA) to
propose an alternative band plan and
negotiation timetable for Puerto Rico
applying certain criteria. The
Commission delegated authority to the
Public Safety and Homeland Security
Bureau (Bureau) to approve or modify
the proposed band plan and timetable,
and suspended the rebanding timetable
for Puerto Rico until a new band plan
was adopted. On October 19, 2007, the
TA filed the requested band plan
proposal in this docket (TA Proposal).
On June 30, 2008, the Bureau sought
comment on the TA Proposal for 800
MHz band reconfiguration in Puerto
Rico as well as alternative band plans,
73 FR 40274, July 14, 2008.
The TA recommended that we also
apply the Puerto Rico band plan to the
U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) because of
the similar incumbencies in the two
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
areas, e.g., the USVI is in the same
Economic Area (EA) as Puerto Rico, the
same EA licensees must relocate to the
ESMR Band, and there is a similar
shortage of ESMR spectrum to
accommodate ESMR-eligible licensees
that wish to relocate. The TA also noted
that the USVI, like Puerto Rico, has sitebased licensees that must be relocated
from the ESMR Band.
Subsequently, in light of the TA’s
recommendation to adopt the same
band plan for the USVI as for Puerto
Rico, the Commission delegated
authority to PSHSB to seek comment on
the USVI portion of the TA Proposal
and to adopt a rebanding plan for the
USVI. In the Third Report and Order
and Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rule Making, the PSHSB tentatively
concluded to adopt, for the USVI, the
same band plan it adopted for Puerto
Rico. The Bureau seeks comment on its
tentative conclusion. The Bureau also
seeks comment on the appropriate
rebanding timetable for the USVI.
Should the Bureau implement an 18month timetable similar to the Puerto
Rico timetable (commencing on the
effective date of the rules adopted for
rebanding in the USVI), or is a different,
possibly shorter, timetable appropriate?
Procedural Matters
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, the Commission has prepared
this present Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the
possible significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities by
the policies and rules proposed in this
Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking portion of the Third Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making (Third FNPRM).
Written public comments are requested
on this IRFA. Comments must be
identified as responses to the IRFA and
must be filed by the deadlines for
comments on the first page of the Third
Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rule Making. The
Commission will send a copy of the
Third Report and Order and Third
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making
including this IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA). In
addition, the Third Report and Order
and Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rule Making and IRFA (or summaries
thereof) will be published in the Federal
Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
In this Third FNPRM, we consider the
800 MHz Transition Administrator’s
(TA) proposal to reconfigure the band
plan for the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI).
In the Second Memorandum Opinion
and Order, the Commission stated that
the alternative band plan would be
confined to Puerto Rico since no party
had identified any comparable channel
shortage outside of Puerto Rico.
However, because Puerto Rico and USVI
are in the same EA, EA 174, and have
the same EA licensees, the USVI faces
the same shortage of ESMR spectrum as
Puerto Rico. Similarly, there are also
high-site incumbents in the USVI to be
relocated from the ESMR band. Given
these circumstances, the TA determined
that the USVI is served best by the same
alternative band plan as Puerto Rico.
Using the same alternative band plan for
the entire EA will also permit frequency
planning and future spectrum
coordination to be performed more
efficiently. Therefore, the TA proposed
that the Puerto Rico band plan be
applied to the USVI. In light of the TA’s
recommendation to adopt the same
band plan for the USVI as for Puerto
Rico, the Commission has delegated
authority to the Bureau to seek comment
on the USVI portion of the TA Proposal
and to adopt a rebanding plan for the
USVI.
Under the TA’s proposal, and
consistent with the U.S. Band Plan and
the new Puerto Rico band plan, all US
Virgin Island incumbents in the 806–
809/851–854 MHz (Channel 1–120)
band segment would be relocated to
comparable spectrum in the Interleaved,
Expansion, or ESMR Band, depending
on their eligibility. All NPSPAC
licensees would be relocated from their
821–824/866–869 MHz channel
assignments to channel assignments 15
MHz downward in the 806–809/851–
854 MHz band segment. Under the TA
Proposal, the USVI band plan would be
the same as the band plan for nonborder regions of the United States (U.S.
Band Plan), except that the Expansion
Band would be expanded by 0.5 MHz in
bandwidth through elimination of the
lower 0.5 MHz portion of the Guard
Band. Under the TA Proposal, the ESMR
Band in EA 174 would remain in the
same channels as in the U.S. Band Plan.
The TA has determined that there will
not be sufficient capacity to
accommodate fully all ESMR and
ESMR-eligible licensees in the ESMR
Band. The TA Proposal provides that
the TA will apportion the USVI ESMR
Band (817–824/862–869 MHz) in
accordance with the provisions set forth
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
by the Commission the 800 MHz Second
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The
TA proposes that all USVI licensees
would be subject to a single 90-day
mandatory negotiation period, after
which any licensee that fails to
negotiate a Frequency Reconfiguration
Agreement with Sprint Nextel would
enter TA-sponsored mediation. The
reconfiguration of the 800 MHz band in
the USVI is in the public interest
because it will allow the Commission to
eliminate interference in these regions
to public safety and other land mobile
communication systems. Interference is
eliminated by separating to the greatest
extent possible––public safety and other
non-cellular licensees from licensees
that employ cellular technology in the
800 MHz band. In that connection, it is
the Bureau’s intent to proceed with
rebanding in the USVI as quickly as is
feasible consistent with the
Commission’s goals in this proceeding.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Legal Basis
The legal basis for any action that may
be taken pursuant to this Third Report
and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making is contained in
Sections 4(i), 303(f) and (r), and 332 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303(f) and
(r), and 332.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Proposed
Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide
a description of, and, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small entities
that may be affected by the proposed
rules. The RFA generally defines the
term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
A small organization is generally any
not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field. Nationwide,
as of 1992, there were approximately
275,801 small organizations. A ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction’’ generally
means ‘‘governments of cities, counties,
towns, townships, villages, school
districts, or special districts, with a
population of less than 50,000.’’ As of
1992, there were approximately 85,006
such jurisdictions in the United States.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
This number included 38,978 counties,
cities and towns; of these, 37,566, or
ninety-six percent, have populations of
fewer than 50,000. The Census Bureau
estimates that this ratio is
approximately accurate for all
governmental entities. Thus, of the
85,006 governmental entities, we
estimate that 81,600 (ninety-one
percent) are small entities. Below, we
further describe and estimate the
number of small entities—applicants
and licensees—that may be affected by
the proposals, if adopted, in this Third
FNPRM.
Public Safety Radio Licensees. Public
safety licensees that operate 800 MHz
systems in the USVI would be required
to relocate their station facilities
according to the band plan proposed in
this Third FNPRM. As indicated above,
all governmental entities with
populations of less than 50,000 fall
within the definition of a small entity.
Business, I/LT, and SMR Licensees.
Business and Industrial Land
Transportation (B/ILT) and Specialized
Mobile Radio (SMR) licensees which
operate 800 MHz systems in the USVI
would be required to relocate their
station facilities according to the band
plan proposed in this Third FNPRM.
Neither the Commission nor the SBA
has developed a definition of small
businesses directed specifically toward
these licensees.
ESMR Licensees. Enhanced
Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR)
licensees and ESMR-eligible licensees
which operate 800 MHz systems in the
USVI would be required to relocate their
station facilities according to the band
plan proposed in this Third FNPRM.
Neither the Commission nor the SBA
has developed a definition of small
businesses directed specifically toward
these licensees.
Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
The Third FNPRM does not propose
a rule that will entail additional
reporting, recordkeeping, and/or thirdparty consultation or other compliance
efforts.
Steps Taken to Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant, specifically
small business alternatives that it has
considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the
following four alternatives (among
others): ‘‘(1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
35365
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.’’
The TA has recommended that we
apply the Puerto Rico band plan to the
USVI because of the similar
incumbencies in the two areas. The
USVI is in the same Economic Area (EA)
as Puerto Rico, the same EA licensees
must relocate to the ESMR Band, and
there is a similar shortage of ESMR
spectrum to accommodate ESMReligible licensees that wish to relocate.
The TA also noted that the USVI, like
Puerto Rico, has site-based licensees
that must be relocated from the ESMR
Band.
To the extent that adoption of the
TA’s proposal may impose an economic
impact in the USVI on relocating nonESMR and site-based incumbents,
including public safety, to the nonESMR band, that impact will be borne
by Sprint Nextel Corp. (Sprint) because
Sprint must pay the costs of 800 MHz
band reconfiguration. Under Small
Business Administration criteria, Sprint
is a large entity. Furthermore, there is
no evidence in the record that nonSprint licensees in the USVI market,
including small wireless cellular, public
safety, governmental entities or other
wireless entities, would suffer adverse
economic consequences. Indeed, these
licensees are likely to enjoy several
benefits, including improved
interference protection, as a result of
band reconfiguration.
Additionally, while apportioning
spectrum in the ESMR band may result
in a reduction in ESMR spectrum
availability, licensees can accommodate
these reductions by employing more
spectrum-efficient technologies and
higher-quality digital technologies.
ESMR and ESMR-eligible licensees are
also likely to receive a number of
benefits as a result of modifying the
USVI Band Plan. For example, as a
consequence of 800 MHz band
reconfiguration, ESMR-eligible licensees
will be able to relocate EA and sitebased facilities to the ESMR band that
are currently located below the ESMR
band. If these facilities are relocated and
integrated into an ESMR band system,
these licensees (1) will be relieved of the
cost and limitations associated with
abating interference created by the
interleaving of ESMR stations with highsite systems used by public safety and
others in the non-ESMR portion of the
band and (2) will be able to take
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
35366
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 22, 2010 / Proposed Rules
advantage of spectrally efficient
technologies.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
None.
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 195
[Docket PHMSA–2008–0186]
Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
RIN 2137–AE36
This document does not contain new
or modified information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public
Law 104–13. Therefore it does not
contain any new or modified
‘‘information burden for small business
concerns with fewer than 25
employees,’’ pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198.
Pipeline Safety: Applying Safety
Regulation to All Rural Onshore
Hazardous Liquid Low-Stress Lines
Congressional Review Act
The Commission will not send a copy
of this Third Report and Order and
Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in
a report to be sent to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office,
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with PROPOSALS
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to
Sections 4(i) and 332 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 332, and
Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 0.191,
0.392, that this Third Report and Order
and Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rule Making is adopted.
It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Third Report and Order and Third
Further Notice of Proposed Rule
Making, including the Final Regulatory
Flexibility Certification and Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis, to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration.
It is further ordered that pursuant to
applicable procedures set forth in
Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415,
1.419, interested parties may file
comments on July 22, 2010, and reply
comments are due August 6, 2010.
Federal Communications Commission.
James Arden Barnett, Jr.,
Rear Admiral (Ret.), Chief, Public Safety and
Homeland Security Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010–14994 Filed 6–21–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 21, 2010
Jkt 220001
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Department of Transportation
(DOT).
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
SUMMARY: PHMSA is proposing to
amend its pipeline safety regulations to
apply safety regulations to rural lowstress hazardous liquid pipelines that
are not covered by safety regulations in
49 CFR Part 195. This change complies
with a mandate in the Pipeline
Inspection, Protection, Enforcement,
and Safety Act of 2006 (PIPES Act).
DATES: Anyone interested in filing
written comments on this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) must do
so by August 23, 2010. PHMSA will
consider late comments filed so far as
practical.
Comments should reference
Docket No. PHMSA–2008–0186 and
may be submitted in the following ways:
• E–Gov Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. This Web site
allows the public to enter comments on
any Federal Register notice issued by
any agency. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: DOT Docket Management
System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington DC, 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: DOT Docket
Management System; West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001 between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Instructions: You should identify the
Docket ID PHMSA–2008–0186 at the
beginning of your comments. If you
submit your comments by mail, submit
two copies. To receive confirmation that
PHMSA received your comments,
include a self-addressed stamped
postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at https://
www.regulations.gov. Note: Comments
are posted without changes or edits to
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
There is a privacy statement published
on https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical contents of the NPRM contact
Mike Israni by phone at 202–366–4571
or by e-mail at Mike.Israni@dot.gov. For
all other information contact Tewabe
Asebe by phone at 202–366–4595 or by
e-mail at tewabe.asebe@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Until
2008, unless a rural low-stress pipeline
crossed a commercially navigable
waterway, a hazardous liquid pipeline
operating at low-stress in a rural area
was not regulated under Federal
pipeline safety regulations in 49 CFR
Part 195. Section 195.2 defines a ‘‘rural
area’’ as outside the limits of any
incorporated or unincorporated city,
town, village, or any other designated
residential or commercial area, such as
a subdivision, a business or shopping
center, or community development.
Because of the potential
environmental damage a release from
these lines could pose, in 2006, PHMSA
issued a NPRM (71 FR 52504),
proposing to apply a threat-focused set
of safety requirements to larger-diameter
(8 5⁄8-inches or greater) rural onshore
hazardous liquid low-stress pipelines
located in or within a quarter mile of an
‘‘unusually sensitive area (USA).’’ USAs
are defined in § 195.6 as drinking water
or other ecological resources that are
unusually sensitive to environmental
damage from a hazardous liquid
pipeline release.
The Pipeline Inspection, Protection,
Enforcement, and Safety Act of 2006
(PIPES Act), was signed into law on
December 29, 2006, (Pub. L. 109–468).
Section four of the PIPES Act (codified
at 49 U.S.C. 60102(k)) requires PHMSA
to ‘‘issue regulations subjecting lowstress hazardous liquid pipelines to the
same standards and regulations as other
hazardous liquid pipelines.’’ The Act
also provides the new regulations could
be issued in phases.
The threat-focused set of requirements
PHMSA proposed in the 2006 NPRM,
although drawn from Part 195, would
not have satisfied the ‘‘same standards
and regulations’’ requirement in the
PIPES Act. PHMSA concluded it would
be inefficient to finalize that proposal
and then later impose the rest of the Part
195 requirements.
Implementation of the PIPES Act
Mandate
PHMSA decided to implement the
PIPES Act mandate in phases, in part
because PHMSA did not have complete
data on the extent of rural low-stress
E:\FR\FM\22JNP1.SGM
22JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 35363-35366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14994]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 90
[WT Docket No. 02-55; DA 10-695]
Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 MHz Band; New
800 MHz Band Plan for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rules.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document summarizes the Third Further Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking portion of the Third Report and Order and Third Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which portion seeks comment on adopting
a new 800 MHz band plan for the U.S. Virgin Islands.
DATES: Comments are due July 22, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be filed using: (1) The Commission's Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS), (2) the Federal Government's eRulemaking
Portal, or (3) by filing paper copies. See Electronic Filing of
Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the Internet by accessing the ECFS: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/
or the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Filers
should follow the instructions provided on the Web site for submitting
comments.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding,
filers must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail (although we continue to experience delays in receiving U.S.
Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission's
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building. Commercial
overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and
Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton Drive, Capitol
Heights, MD 20743. U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and
Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC
20554.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street, SW., Washington DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(voice), 202-418-0432 (tty).
Parties should send a copy of their filings to John
Evanoff, Policy Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau,
Federal Communications Commission, Room 7-B550, 445 12th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or by e-mail to john.evanoff@fcc.gov. Parties
shall also serve one copy with the Commission's copy contractor, Best
Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488-5300, or via e-mail to
fcc@bcpiweb.com.
Documents in WT Docket No. 02-55 will be available for
public inspection and copying during business hours at the FCC
Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The documents may also be purchased from
BCPI, telephone (202) 488-5300, facsimile (202) 488-5563, TTY (202)
488-5562, e-mail fcc@bcpiweb.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Evanoff, Policy Division, Public
Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, (202) 418-0848.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Third Further
Notice of
[[Page 35364]]
Proposed Rulemaking portion of the Commission's Third Report and Order
and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, DA 10-695, released
on April 26, 2010. This summary should be read in conjunction with its
companion document, the summary of the Third Report and Order portion
of the Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule
Making, published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. The
complete text of the document is available for inspection and copying
during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Information Center,
Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554.
This document may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160 or (202) 863-
2893, facsimile (202) 863-2898, or via e-mail at https://www.bcpiweb.com. It is also available on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.fcc.gov.
Synopsis of the Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
In a July 2004 Report and Order, the Commission reconfigured the
800 MHz band to eliminate interference to public safety and other land
mobile communication systems operating in the band, 69 FR 67823,
November 22, 2004. In a Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, adopted in
May 2007, the Commission determined that an alternative band plan was
appropriate for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Puerto Rico) due to
the unique nature of 800 MHz incumbency in the Puerto Rico market
compared to other markets, 72 FR 39756, July 20, 2007. Rather than
specify a band plan for Puerto Rico, the Commission directed the 800
MHz Transition Administrator (TA) to propose an alternative band plan
and negotiation timetable for Puerto Rico applying certain criteria.
The Commission delegated authority to the Public Safety and Homeland
Security Bureau (Bureau) to approve or modify the proposed band plan
and timetable, and suspended the rebanding timetable for Puerto Rico
until a new band plan was adopted. On October 19, 2007, the TA filed
the requested band plan proposal in this docket (TA Proposal). On June
30, 2008, the Bureau sought comment on the TA Proposal for 800 MHz band
reconfiguration in Puerto Rico as well as alternative band plans, 73 FR
40274, July 14, 2008.
The TA recommended that we also apply the Puerto Rico band plan to
the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) because of the similar incumbencies in
the two areas, e.g., the USVI is in the same Economic Area (EA) as
Puerto Rico, the same EA licensees must relocate to the ESMR Band, and
there is a similar shortage of ESMR spectrum to accommodate ESMR-
eligible licensees that wish to relocate. The TA also noted that the
USVI, like Puerto Rico, has site-based licensees that must be relocated
from the ESMR Band.
Subsequently, in light of the TA's recommendation to adopt the same
band plan for the USVI as for Puerto Rico, the Commission delegated
authority to PSHSB to seek comment on the USVI portion of the TA
Proposal and to adopt a rebanding plan for the USVI. In the Third
Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making, the
PSHSB tentatively concluded to adopt, for the USVI, the same band plan
it adopted for Puerto Rico. The Bureau seeks comment on its tentative
conclusion. The Bureau also seeks comment on the appropriate rebanding
timetable for the USVI. Should the Bureau implement an 18-month
timetable similar to the Puerto Rico timetable (commencing on the
effective date of the rules adopted for rebanding in the USVI), or is a
different, possibly shorter, timetable appropriate?
Procedural Matters
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), as
amended, the Commission has prepared this present Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules
proposed in this Third Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking portion of
the Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule
Making (Third FNPRM). Written public comments are requested on this
IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be
filed by the deadlines for comments on the first page of the Third
Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making. The
Commission will send a copy of the Third Report and Order and Third
Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making including this IRFA, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).
In addition, the Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making and IRFA (or summaries thereof) will be published
in the Federal Register.
Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
In this Third FNPRM, we consider the 800 MHz Transition
Administrator's (TA) proposal to reconfigure the band plan for the U.S.
Virgin Islands (USVI). In the Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, the
Commission stated that the alternative band plan would be confined to
Puerto Rico since no party had identified any comparable channel
shortage outside of Puerto Rico. However, because Puerto Rico and USVI
are in the same EA, EA 174, and have the same EA licensees, the USVI
faces the same shortage of ESMR spectrum as Puerto Rico. Similarly,
there are also high-site incumbents in the USVI to be relocated from
the ESMR band. Given these circumstances, the TA determined that the
USVI is served best by the same alternative band plan as Puerto Rico.
Using the same alternative band plan for the entire EA will also permit
frequency planning and future spectrum coordination to be performed
more efficiently. Therefore, the TA proposed that the Puerto Rico band
plan be applied to the USVI. In light of the TA's recommendation to
adopt the same band plan for the USVI as for Puerto Rico, the
Commission has delegated authority to the Bureau to seek comment on the
USVI portion of the TA Proposal and to adopt a rebanding plan for the
USVI.
Under the TA's proposal, and consistent with the U.S. Band Plan and
the new Puerto Rico band plan, all US Virgin Island incumbents in the
806-809/851-854 MHz (Channel 1-120) band segment would be relocated to
comparable spectrum in the Interleaved, Expansion, or ESMR Band,
depending on their eligibility. All NPSPAC licensees would be relocated
from their 821-824/866-869 MHz channel assignments to channel
assignments 15 MHz downward in the 806-809/851-854 MHz band segment.
Under the TA Proposal, the USVI band plan would be the same as the band
plan for non-border regions of the United States (U.S. Band Plan),
except that the Expansion Band would be expanded by 0.5 MHz in
bandwidth through elimination of the lower 0.5 MHz portion of the Guard
Band. Under the TA Proposal, the ESMR Band in EA 174 would remain in
the same channels as in the U.S. Band Plan. The TA has determined that
there will not be sufficient capacity to accommodate fully all ESMR and
ESMR-eligible licensees in the ESMR Band. The TA Proposal provides that
the TA will apportion the USVI ESMR Band (817-824/862-869 MHz) in
accordance with the provisions set forth
[[Page 35365]]
by the Commission the 800 MHz Second Memorandum Opinion and Order. The
TA proposes that all USVI licensees would be subject to a single 90-day
mandatory negotiation period, after which any licensee that fails to
negotiate a Frequency Reconfiguration Agreement with Sprint Nextel
would enter TA-sponsored mediation. The reconfiguration of the 800 MHz
band in the USVI is in the public interest because it will allow the
Commission to eliminate interference in these regions to public safety
and other land mobile communication systems. Interference is eliminated
by separating to the greatest extent possible--public safety and other
non-cellular licensees from licensees that employ cellular technology
in the 800 MHz band. In that connection, it is the Bureau's intent to
proceed with rebanding in the USVI as quickly as is feasible consistent
with the Commission's goals in this proceeding.
Legal Basis
The legal basis for any action that may be taken pursuant to this
Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of Proposed Rule Making
is contained in Sections 4(i), 303(f) and (r), and 332 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 303(f) and
(r), and 332.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply
The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules. The RFA generally defines the term
``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small governmental
jurisdiction.'' In addition, the term ``small business'' has the same
meaning as the term ``small business concern'' under the Small Business
Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned
and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3)
satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
A small organization is generally any not-for-profit enterprise
which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its
field. Nationwide, as of 1992, there were approximately 275,801 small
organizations. A ``small governmental jurisdiction'' generally means
``governments of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school
districts, or special districts, with a population of less than
50,000.'' As of 1992, there were approximately 85,006 such
jurisdictions in the United States. This number included 38,978
counties, cities and towns; of these, 37,566, or ninety-six percent,
have populations of fewer than 50,000. The Census Bureau estimates that
this ratio is approximately accurate for all governmental entities.
Thus, of the 85,006 governmental entities, we estimate that 81,600
(ninety-one percent) are small entities. Below, we further describe and
estimate the number of small entities--applicants and licensees--that
may be affected by the proposals, if adopted, in this Third FNPRM.
Public Safety Radio Licensees. Public safety licensees that operate
800 MHz systems in the USVI would be required to relocate their station
facilities according to the band plan proposed in this Third FNPRM. As
indicated above, all governmental entities with populations of less
than 50,000 fall within the definition of a small entity.
Business, I/LT, and SMR Licensees. Business and Industrial Land
Transportation (B/ILT) and Specialized Mobile Radio (SMR) licensees
which operate 800 MHz systems in the USVI would be required to relocate
their station facilities according to the band plan proposed in this
Third FNPRM. Neither the Commission nor the SBA has developed a
definition of small businesses directed specifically toward these
licensees.
ESMR Licensees. Enhanced Specialized Mobile Radio (ESMR) licensees
and ESMR-eligible licensees which operate 800 MHz systems in the USVI
would be required to relocate their station facilities according to the
band plan proposed in this Third FNPRM. Neither the Commission nor the
SBA has developed a definition of small businesses directed
specifically toward these licensees.
Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
The Third FNPRM does not propose a rule that will entail additional
reporting, recordkeeping, and/or third-party consultation or other
compliance efforts.
Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities,
and Significant Alternatives Considered
The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business alternatives that it has considered in
reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four
alternatives (among others): ``(1) The establishment of differing
compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small entities; (2) the
clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance or
reporting requirements under the rule for small entities; (3) the use
of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities.''
The TA has recommended that we apply the Puerto Rico band plan to
the USVI because of the similar incumbencies in the two areas. The USVI
is in the same Economic Area (EA) as Puerto Rico, the same EA licensees
must relocate to the ESMR Band, and there is a similar shortage of ESMR
spectrum to accommodate ESMR-eligible licensees that wish to relocate.
The TA also noted that the USVI, like Puerto Rico, has site-based
licensees that must be relocated from the ESMR Band.
To the extent that adoption of the TA's proposal may impose an
economic impact in the USVI on relocating non-ESMR and site-based
incumbents, including public safety, to the non-ESMR band, that impact
will be borne by Sprint Nextel Corp. (Sprint) because Sprint must pay
the costs of 800 MHz band reconfiguration. Under Small Business
Administration criteria, Sprint is a large entity. Furthermore, there
is no evidence in the record that non-Sprint licensees in the USVI
market, including small wireless cellular, public safety, governmental
entities or other wireless entities, would suffer adverse economic
consequences. Indeed, these licensees are likely to enjoy several
benefits, including improved interference protection, as a result of
band reconfiguration.
Additionally, while apportioning spectrum in the ESMR band may
result in a reduction in ESMR spectrum availability, licensees can
accommodate these reductions by employing more spectrum-efficient
technologies and higher-quality digital technologies. ESMR and ESMR-
eligible licensees are also likely to receive a number of benefits as a
result of modifying the USVI Band Plan. For example, as a consequence
of 800 MHz band reconfiguration, ESMR-eligible licensees will be able
to relocate EA and site-based facilities to the ESMR band that are
currently located below the ESMR band. If these facilities are
relocated and integrated into an ESMR band system, these licensees (1)
will be relieved of the cost and limitations associated with abating
interference created by the interleaving of ESMR stations with high-
site systems used by public safety and others in the non-ESMR portion
of the band and (2) will be able to take
[[Page 35366]]
advantage of spectrally efficient technologies.
Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
None.
Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis
This document does not contain new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104-13. Therefore it does not contain any new or
modified ``information burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees,'' pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198.
Congressional Review Act
The Commission will not send a copy of this Third Report and Order
and Third Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in a report to be sent to
Congress and the Government Accountability Office, pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act.
Ordering Clauses
Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to Sections 4(i) and 332 of
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 332, and
Sections 0.191 and 0.392 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.191,
0.392, that this Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making is adopted.
It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Third Report and Order and Third Further Notice of
Proposed Rule Making, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility
Certification and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
It is further ordered that pursuant to applicable procedures set
forth in Sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR
1.415, 1.419, interested parties may file comments on July 22, 2010,
and reply comments are due August 6, 2010.
Federal Communications Commission.
James Arden Barnett, Jr.,
Rear Admiral (Ret.), Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-14994 Filed 6-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P