Safety Zones: Neptune Deep Water Port, Atlantic Ocean, Boston, MA, 34929-34932 [2010-14851]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Jun 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a
temporary safety zone. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165, as follows:
34929
yards from Pier 66, Elliott Bay, WA
within a box encompassed by the points
47°36.719′ N 122°21.099′ W, 47°36.682′
N 122°21.149′ W, 47°36.514′ N
122°20.865′ W, and 47°36.552′ N
122°20.814′ W (NAD 83).
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, no vessel operator may enter
or remain in the safety zone without the
permission of the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative, thirty
minutes prior to the beginning of the
parade of ships and thirty minutes
following the conclusion of the parade
of ships on August 4th, 2010. The Coast
Guard will provide notice to the public
of enforcement of this zone through
both the Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcast on the
day of the event.
For the purposes of this rule the
Parade of Ships includes both the pass
and review of the ships near Pier 66 and
the aerial demonstrations immediately
following the pass and review. The
Captain of the Port may be assisted by
other federal, state, or local agencies
with the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated Representative by
contacting the on scene patrol craft on
VHF Ch 16 or the Coast Guard Sector
Seattle Joint Harbor Operations Center
(JHOC) via telephone at (206) 217–6001.
Vessel operators granted permission to
enter the zone will be escorted by the
on-scene Coast Guard patrol craft until
they are outside of the safety zone.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 8 a.m. until 8 p.m. on
August 4, 2010, unless canceled sooner
by the Captain of the Port.
Dated: June 5, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2010–14849 Filed 6–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for Part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
Coast Guard
2. Add § 165.T13–150 to read as
follows:
RIN 1625–AA00
§ 165.T13–150 Safety Zone; Fleet Week
Maritime Festival, Pier 66, Elliott Bay,
Seattle, WA
Safety Zones: Neptune Deep Water
Port, Atlantic Ocean, Boston, MA
■
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters extending 100
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0542]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
34930
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing two temporary safety zones
extending 500 meters in all directions
from each of the two submerged turret
loading (STL) buoys and accompanying
systems that are part of GDF Suez
Energy’s Neptune Deepwater Port
located in the Atlantic Ocean off of
Boston, Massachusetts. The purpose of
these temporary safety zones is to
protect vessels and mariners from the
potential safety hazards associated with
construction of the deepwater port
facilities and the large sub-surface turret
buoys, and to protect the deepwater port
infrastructure. All vessels, with the
exception of deepwater port support
vessels, are prohibited from entering
into, remaining or moving within either
of the safety zones.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR
on June 21, 2010. This rule is effective
with actual notice for purposes of
enforcement from 12:01 a.m. June 12,
2010 until 11:59 p.m. December 31,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0542 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0542 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant
Commander Pamela Garcia, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Boston;
telephone 617–223–3028, e-mail
Pamela.P.Garcia@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Jun 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. The deepwater
port facilities discussed elsewhere in
this rule are in the final stages of
completion and present a potential
safety hazard to vessels, especially
fishing vessels, operating in the vicinity
of submerged structures associated with
the deepwater port facility. A more
robust regulatory scheme, (NPRM;
USCG–2009–0589), to ensure the safety
and security of vessels operating in the
area, was developed via separate
rulemaking, and was available for
review and comment at the Web site
https://www.regulations.gov. These
safety zones are needed pending
implementation of a final regulatory
action, which will be proposed in a
separate rulemaking docket titled:
Neptune Deep Water Port, Atlantic
Ocean, Boston, MA; Final Rule (USCG–
2009–0589), to protect vessels from the
hazard posed by the presence of the
currently uncharted, submerged
deepwater infrastructure.
The current construction schedule
that includes installation of underwater
structures does not allow time to
conduct a notice and comment period
for this rule therefore publication of an
NPRM is impractical. Further, delaying
the effective date pending completion of
notice and comment rulemaking is
contrary to the public interest to the
extent it would expose vessels currently
operating in the area to the known, but
otherwise uncharted submerged
hazards.
For the reasons outlined above, the
Coast Guard finds under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Further, a delay or
cancellation of this portion of the
construction to facilitate 30 days
publication before the rule is made
effective is contrary to the public’s
interest in the timely completion of this
project.
Basis and Purpose
On March 23, 2007, the Maritime
Administration (MARAD), in
accordance with the Deepwater Port Act
of 1974, as amended, issued a license to
Suez Energy to own, construct, and
operate a natural gas deepwater port,
‘‘Neptune’’. Neptune Deepwater Port
(NEPTUNE) is located in the Atlantic
Ocean, approximately eight nautical
miles South-southeast of Gloucester,
Massachusetts, in Federal waters. The
two STL buoys, which are circled at
approximately 500 meters on the surface
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the water by several small white
buoys labeled LNG with red flags and
radar-reflected buoys known as Hi
Flyers are located in the following
approximate positions: STL Buoy A:
Latitude 42°29′12.3″ N, Longitude
070°36′29.7″ W; and, STL Buoy B:
Latitude 42°27′20.5″ N, Longitude
070°36′07.3″ W. The Neptune
Deepwater Port can accommodate the
mooring, connecting, and offloading of
two liquefied natural gas carriers
(LNGCs) at one time. The Neptune
Deepwater Port operator plans to offload
LNGCs by regasifying the liquefied
natural gas (LNG) on board the vessels.
The regasified natural gas is then
transferred through two STL buoys, via
a flexible riser leading to a seabed
pipeline that ties into the existing
Algonquin Gas Transmission Pipeline
for transfer to shore. GDF Suez recently
completed installation of the STL buoys
and associated sub-surface
infrastructure, which includes, among
other things, a significant sub-surface
sea anchor and mooring system. The
temporary zones created by this rule
ensures that there is no gap in safety
regulations so as to ensure the safety of
persons and vessels operating around
the submerged deepwater port
infrastructure while public comments
on the NPRM creating permanent
regulations around the Neptune
Deepwater Port facility are analyzed and
final regulatory action is completed.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing two
temporary safety zones of 500 meters in
radius around the two Neptune
Deepwater Port STL buoys as described
above to protect vessels from these
submerged hazards. All vessels, other
than Liquefied Natural Gas carriers and
associated support vessels are
prohibited from entering into, remaining
or moving within the safety and security
zones.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
This regulation is not significant as it
establishes a safety zone around the
buoys and under water infrastructure of
the Neptune Deep Water Port. Extensive
outreach has been conducted by the
company, GDF Suez Energy, with the
local boating and fishing community so
as to minimize impacts. In addition, the
company has stationed a vessel at the
location of the Neptune project to notify
vessels potentially conducting under
water operations of the local dangers.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
fishing and recreational vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a
portion of the Atlantic Ocean,
Massachusetts Bay area covered by this
rule. These safety zones will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. These two safety
zones only extend for 500 meters from
each of the STL buoys allowing
navigation in all other areas of
Massachusetts Bay and public
notification of the safety and the
inherent dangers of the STL buoys and
underwater equipment will continue to
be made by the Coast Guard as well as
Neptune personnel.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Jun 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34931
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
34932
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 118 / Monday, June 21, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
involves the creation of two safety zones
around a submerged buoy and its
associated infrastructure. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination will
be available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0542 to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T01–0542 Safety Zones: Neptune
Deepwater Port, Atlantic Ocean, Boston,
MA.
(a) Location. The following areas are
safety zones: All navigable waters of the
United States within a 500-meter radius
of each of the two STL buoys of the
Neptune Deepwater Port, marked on the
surface of the water by several small,
white buoys labeled LNG with red flags
and radar-reflected buoys known as ‘‘Hi
Flyers’’ located at approximate positions
42°29′12.3″ N, 070°36′29.7″ W and 42°
27′20.5″ N, 070°36′07.3″ W. [NAD83].
(b) Notification. Coast Guard Sector
Boston will cause notice of the
enforcement of this temporary safety
zone to be made by all appropriate
means to affect the widest publicity
among the effected segments of the
public, including publication in the
Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
(c) Enforcement Period. This safety
zone will be enforced at 12:01 a.m.
Saturday June 12, 2010 until 11:59 p.m.
December 31, 2010.
(d) Definitions. As used in this
section:
Authorized representative means a
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer or a Federal, State, or local
law enforcement officer designated by
or assisting the Captain of the Port
Boston (COTP).
Deepwater port means any facility or
structure meeting the definition of
deepwater port in 33 CFR 148.5.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:37 Jun 18, 2010
Jkt 220001
Support vessel means any vessel
meeting the definition of support vessel
in 33 CFR 148.5.
(e) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained
in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general
regulations entry into or movement
within these safety zones is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Boston. Liquefied Natural Gas
Carrier vessels and related Support
Vessels calling on the Neptune
Deepwater Port are authorized to enter
and move within the safety zones of this
section in the normal course of their
operations.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the Coast Guard Captain of
the Port or authorized representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by an
authorized representative by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the
operator of the vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) Persons and vessels may contact
the Coast Guard to request permission to
enter the zone on VHF–FM Channel 16
or via phone at 617–223–5761.
Dated: June 9, 2010.
John N. Healey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2010–14851 Filed 6–18–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0235]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Michigan City Super Boat
Grand Prix, Lake Michigan, Michigan
City, IN
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Lake Michigan near Michigan City,
Indiana. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of Lake Michigan
due to a high speed boat racing event.
This temporary safety zone is necessary
to protect the surrounding public and
their vessels from the hazards associated
with a high speed boat racing event.
DATES: This regulation is effective from
9 a.m. until 4 p.m. on August 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0235 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0235 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, contact or e-mail Petty Officer
Adam Kraft, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Lake Michigan, at (414) 747–7154 or
Adam.D.Kraft@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone (202)
366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 28, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Michigan City
Super Boat Grand Prix, Lake Michigan,
Michigan City, IN in the Federal
Register (75 FR 22333). We received 0
comments on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested and none
was held.
Basis and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect vessels from the
hazards associated with the Michigan
City Super Boat Grand Prix. The Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, has
determined that the Michigan City
Super Boat Grand Prix presents a
significant risk to public safety and
property. The likely combination of
congested waterways and high speed
boat racing presents a significant risk of
serious injuries or fatalities.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
No comments were received
concerning this rule. No substantive
changes have been made to the rule as
proposed.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
E:\FR\FM\21JNR1.SGM
21JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 118 (Monday, June 21, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34929-34932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0542]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones: Neptune Deep Water Port, Atlantic Ocean, Boston, MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 34930]]
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones
extending 500 meters in all directions from each of the two submerged
turret loading (STL) buoys and accompanying systems that are part of
GDF Suez Energy's Neptune Deepwater Port located in the Atlantic Ocean
off of Boston, Massachusetts. The purpose of these temporary safety
zones is to protect vessels and mariners from the potential safety
hazards associated with construction of the deepwater port facilities
and the large sub-surface turret buoys, and to protect the deepwater
port infrastructure. All vessels, with the exception of deepwater port
support vessels, are prohibited from entering into, remaining or moving
within either of the safety zones.
DATES: This rule is effective in the CFR on June 21, 2010. This rule is
effective with actual notice for purposes of enforcement from 12:01
a.m. June 12, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. December 31, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0542 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0542 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Commander Pamela Garcia,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard Sector Boston; telephone 617-223-
3028, e-mail Pamela.P.Garcia@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule. The deepwater port facilities discussed
elsewhere in this rule are in the final stages of completion and
present a potential safety hazard to vessels, especially fishing
vessels, operating in the vicinity of submerged structures associated
with the deepwater port facility. A more robust regulatory scheme,
(NPRM; USCG-2009-0589), to ensure the safety and security of vessels
operating in the area, was developed via separate rulemaking, and was
available for review and comment at the Web site https://www.regulations.gov. These safety zones are needed pending
implementation of a final regulatory action, which will be proposed in
a separate rulemaking docket titled: Neptune Deep Water Port, Atlantic
Ocean, Boston, MA; Final Rule (USCG-2009-0589), to protect vessels from
the hazard posed by the presence of the currently uncharted, submerged
deepwater infrastructure.
The current construction schedule that includes installation of
underwater structures does not allow time to conduct a notice and
comment period for this rule therefore publication of an NPRM is
impractical. Further, delaying the effective date pending completion of
notice and comment rulemaking is contrary to the public interest to the
extent it would expose vessels currently operating in the area to the
known, but otherwise uncharted submerged hazards.
For the reasons outlined above, the Coast Guard finds under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3) that good cause exists for making this rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Further, a
delay or cancellation of this portion of the construction to facilitate
30 days publication before the rule is made effective is contrary to
the public's interest in the timely completion of this project.
Basis and Purpose
On March 23, 2007, the Maritime Administration (MARAD), in
accordance with the Deepwater Port Act of 1974, as amended, issued a
license to Suez Energy to own, construct, and operate a natural gas
deepwater port, ``Neptune''. Neptune Deepwater Port (NEPTUNE) is
located in the Atlantic Ocean, approximately eight nautical miles
South-southeast of Gloucester, Massachusetts, in Federal waters. The
two STL buoys, which are circled at approximately 500 meters on the
surface of the water by several small white buoys labeled LNG with red
flags and radar-reflected buoys known as Hi Flyers are located in the
following approximate positions: STL Buoy A: Latitude
42[deg]29[min]12.3[sec] N, Longitude 070[deg]36[min]29.7[sec] W; and,
STL Buoy B: Latitude 42[deg]27[min]20.5[sec] N, Longitude
070[deg]36[min]07.3[sec] W. The Neptune Deepwater Port can accommodate
the mooring, connecting, and offloading of two liquefied natural gas
carriers (LNGCs) at one time. The Neptune Deepwater Port operator plans
to offload LNGCs by regasifying the liquefied natural gas (LNG) on
board the vessels. The regasified natural gas is then transferred
through two STL buoys, via a flexible riser leading to a seabed
pipeline that ties into the existing Algonquin Gas Transmission
Pipeline for transfer to shore. GDF Suez recently completed
installation of the STL buoys and associated sub-surface
infrastructure, which includes, among other things, a significant sub-
surface sea anchor and mooring system. The temporary zones created by
this rule ensures that there is no gap in safety regulations so as to
ensure the safety of persons and vessels operating around the submerged
deepwater port infrastructure while public comments on the NPRM
creating permanent regulations around the Neptune Deepwater Port
facility are analyzed and final regulatory action is completed.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing two temporary safety zones of 500
meters in radius around the two Neptune Deepwater Port STL buoys as
described above to protect vessels from these submerged hazards. All
vessels, other than Liquefied Natural Gas carriers and associated
support vessels are prohibited from entering into, remaining or moving
within the safety and security zones.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
[[Page 34931]]
This regulation is not significant as it establishes a safety zone
around the buoys and under water infrastructure of the Neptune Deep
Water Port. Extensive outreach has been conducted by the company, GDF
Suez Energy, with the local boating and fishing community so as to
minimize impacts. In addition, the company has stationed a vessel at
the location of the Neptune project to notify vessels potentially
conducting under water operations of the local dangers.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of fishing and recreational
vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the Atlantic
Ocean, Massachusetts Bay area covered by this rule. These safety zones
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities for the following reasons. These two safety zones only
extend for 500 meters from each of the STL buoys allowing navigation in
all other areas of Massachusetts Bay and public notification of the
safety and the inherent dangers of the STL buoys and underwater
equipment will continue to be made by the Coast Guard as well as
Neptune personnel.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
[[Page 34932]]
involves the creation of two safety zones around a submerged buoy and
its associated infrastructure. An environmental analysis checklist and
a categorical exclusion determination will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0542 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0542 Safety Zones: Neptune Deepwater Port, Atlantic
Ocean, Boston, MA.
(a) Location. The following areas are safety zones: All navigable
waters of the United States within a 500-meter radius of each of the
two STL buoys of the Neptune Deepwater Port, marked on the surface of
the water by several small, white buoys labeled LNG with red flags and
radar-reflected buoys known as ``Hi Flyers'' located at approximate
positions 42[deg]29'12.3'' N, 070[deg]36'29.7'' W and 42[deg] 27'20.5''
N, 070[deg]36'07.3'' W. [NAD83].
(b) Notification. Coast Guard Sector Boston will cause notice of
the enforcement of this temporary safety zone to be made by all
appropriate means to affect the widest publicity among the effected
segments of the public, including publication in the Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Enforcement Period. This safety zone will be enforced at 12:01
a.m. Saturday June 12, 2010 until 11:59 p.m. December 31, 2010.
(d) Definitions. As used in this section:
Authorized representative means a Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer or a Federal, State, or local law enforcement
officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Boston
(COTP).
Deepwater port means any facility or structure meeting the
definition of deepwater port in 33 CFR 148.5.
Support vessel means any vessel meeting the definition of support
vessel in 33 CFR 148.5.
(e) Regulations.
(1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23 apply.
(2) In accordance with the general regulations entry into or
movement within these safety zones is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port Boston. Liquefied Natural Gas Carrier vessels
and related Support Vessels calling on the Neptune Deepwater Port are
authorized to enter and move within the safety zones of this section in
the normal course of their operations.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or authorized representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by an authorized representative by siren,
radio, flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall
proceed as directed.
(5) Persons and vessels may contact the Coast Guard to request
permission to enter the zone on VHF-FM Channel 16 or via phone at 617-
223-5761.
Dated: June 9, 2010.
John N. Healey,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Boston.
[FR Doc. 2010-14851 Filed 6-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P