Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products, 34746-34748 [2010-14817]

Download as PDF 34746 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices and 2). For example, 41 percent of U.S. consumers say they have never looked for any recalled product in their home (Ref. 2). Conversely, some consumers overreact to the announcement of a foodborne illness outbreak or food recall. In response to the 2006 fresh, bagged spinach recall which followed a multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157: H7 infections (Ref. 3), 18 percent of consumers said they stopped buying other bagged, fresh produce because of the spinach recall (Ref. 1). Research shows that emotion plays a large role in decisionmaking, and that individuals may not be conscious of its effects on their behavior (Ref. 4). For example, when people are angry they are likely to place blame, take action, and want justice to be served (Ref. 5). If a particular food recall engenders widespread anger and the anger is coupled with behavior that is less than desirable from a food safety or nutritional standpoint, it is possible that anger will be the lens through which future food recall situations are viewed, thus resulting in similar undesirable behaviors. Findings from this study will help FDA understand the emotional response to food recalls. This will help FDA to design more effective consumer food recall messages during and after a recall. FDA conducts research and educational and public information programs relating to food safety under its broad statutory authority, set forth in section 903(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 393(b)(2)), to protect the public health by ensuring that foods are ‘‘safe, wholesome, sanitary, and properly labeled,’’ and in section 903(d)(2)(C), to conduct research relating to foods, drugs, cosmetics, and devices in carrying out the act. FDA plans to survey U.S. consumers using a Web-based panel of U.S. households to collect information on consumers’ cognitive and emotional reaction to food recalls. The survey will query consumers on their recollection of food recalls within the past 5 years; attitude toward recalled foods; knowledge about particular food recalls; behavior during the food recall; assessment and appraisals of susceptibility, severity, satisfaction, and self-efficacy. The data will be collected using an online survey. A pool of 10,000 consumers from a Web-based consumer panel will be screened for eligibility based on age (18+ years) and familiarity with recent food recalls. One thousand of those screened consumers will be randomly selected to participate in the survey. The results of the survey will not be used to generate population estimates. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1 No. of Respondents Activity Screener Hours per Response Total Hours 1 10,000 .006 60 40 1 40 .167 7 1,000 1 1,000 .167 167 11,040 1 11,040 Survey Total 234 are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Ten thousand members of a Webbased consumer panel will be screened. We estimate that it will take a respondent 20 seconds (.006 hours) to complete the screening questions, for a total of 60 hours. We will conduct a pretest of the survey with 40 respondents; we estimate that it will take a respondent 10 minutes (.167 hours) to complete the pre-test, for a total of 7 hours. One thousand (1,000) respondents will complete the survey. We estimate that it will take a respondent 10 minutes (.167 hours) to complete the survey, for a total of 167 hours. Thus, the total estimated burden is 234 hours. II. References srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Total Annual Responses 10,000 Pre-test 1 There Annual Frequency per Response 1. Cuite, C., S. Condry, M. Nucci, et al., ‘‘Public Response to the Contaminated Spinach Recall of 2006,’’ Publication number RR–0107–013, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, Food Policy Institute, 2007. 2. Hallman, W., C. Cuite, and N. Hooker, ‘‘Consumer Responses to Food Recalls: 2009 National Survey Report,’’ Publication number RR–0109–018, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers, VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 220001 the State University of New Jersey, Food Policy Institute, 2009. 3. Acheson, D., ‘‘Outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157 Infections Associated With Fresh Spinach—United States, August-September 2006,’’ 2007 (https://first.fda.gov/cafdas/ documents/Acheson_Spinach_ Outbreak_2006_FDA_pres.ppt). 4. Han, S., J. S. Lerner, and D. Keltner, ‘‘Feelings and Consumer Decision Making: The Appraisal-Tendency Framework,’’ Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(3) 158– 168, 2007. 5. Lazurus, R. S., ‘‘Emotion and Adaptation,’’ New York: Oxford University Press, 1991. Dated: June 14, 2010. David Dorsey, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget. [FR Doc. 2010–14815 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–N–0182] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 19, 2010. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 34747 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910–0354. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50– 400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301–796– 3793. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products—(OMB Control Number 0910–0354)—Extension FDA regulations in part 123 (21 CFR part 123) mandate the application of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) principles to the processing of seafood. HACCP is a preventive system of hazard control designed to help ensure the safety of foods. The regulations were issued under FDA’s statutory authority to regulate food safety, including section 402(a)(1) and (a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(1) and (a)(4)). Certain provisions in part 123 require that processors and importers of seafood collect and record information. The HACCP records compiled and maintained by a seafood processor primarily consist of the periodic observations recorded at selected monitoring points during processing and packaging operations, as called for in a processor’s HACCP plan (e.g., the values for processing times, temperatures, acidity, etc., as observed at critical control points). The primary purpose of HACCP records is to permit a processor to verify that products have been produced within carefully established processing parameters (critical limits) that ensure that hazards have been avoided. HACCP records are normally reviewed by appropriately trained employees at the end of a production lot or at the end of a day or week of production to verify that control limits have been maintained, or that appropriate corrective actions were taken if the critical limits were not maintained. Such verification activities are essential to ensure that the HACCP system is working as planned. A review of these records during the conduct of periodic plant inspections also permits FDA to determine whether the products have been consistently processed in conformance with appropriate HACCP food safety controls. Section 123.12 requires that importers of seafood products take affirmative steps and maintain records that verify that the fish and fishery products they offer for import into the United States were processed in accordance with the HACCP and sanitation provisions set forth in part 123. These records are also to be made available for review by FDA as provided in § 123.12(c). The time and costs of these recordkeeping activities will vary considerably among processors and importers of fish and fishery products, depending on the type and number of products involved, and on the nature of the equipment or instruments required to monitor critical control points. The burden estimate in table 1 of this document includes only those collections of information under the seafood HACCP regulations that are not already required under other statutes and regulations. The estimate also does not include collections of information that are a usual and customary part of businesses’ normal activities. For example, the tagging and labeling of molluscan shellfish (§ 1240.60 (21 CFR 1240.60)) is a customary and usual practice among seafood processors. Consequently, the estimates in table 1 account only for information collection and recording requirements attributable to part 123. Respondents to this collection of information include processors and importers of seafood. In the Federal Register of April 9, 2010 (75 FR 18211), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL RECORDKEEPING BURDEN1 21 CFR Section2 No. of Recordkeepers 123.6(a),(b), and (c) Annual Frequency of Recordkeeping3 Total Annual Records Hours per Record4 Total Hours 50 1 50 16.00 800 123.6(c)(5) 15,000 4 60,000 0.30 18,000 123.8(a)(1) and (c) 15,000 1 15,000 4.00 60,000 4,100 80 328,000 0.20 65,600 15,000 280 4,200,000 0.30 1,260,000 123.7(d) 6,000 4 24,000 0.10 2,400 123.8(d) 15,000 47 705,000 0.10 70,500 123.11(c) 15,000 280 4,200,000 0.10 420,000 123.12(c) 4,100 80 328,000 0.10 32,800 41 1 41 4.00 164 123.12(a)(2)(ii) srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES 123.6(c)(7) 123.12(a)(2) Total 1,930,264 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. estimates include the information collection requirements in the following sections: § 123.16—Smoked Fish—process controls (see § 123.6(b)); § 123.28(a)—Source Controls—molluscan shellfish (see § 123.6(b)); § 123.28(c) and (d)—Records—molluscan shellfish (see § 123.6(c)(7)). 2These VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:17 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1 34748 3Based Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices on an estimated 280 working days per year. average time per 8-hour workday unless one-time response. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES 4Estimated FDA bases this hour burden estimate on its experience with the application of HACCP principles in food processing. Further, the burdens have been estimated using typical small seafood processing firms as a model because these firms represent a significant proportion of the industry. The hour burden of HACCP recordkeeping activities will vary considerably among processors and importers of fish and fishery products, depending on the size of the facility and complexity of the HACCP control scheme (i.e., the number of products and the number of hazards controlled); the daily frequency that control points are monitored and values recorded; and also on the extent that data recording time and cost are minimized by the use of automated data logging technology. The burden estimate does not include burden hours for activities that are a usual and customary part of businesses’ normal activities. For example, the tagging and labeling of molluscan shellfish (§ 1240.60) is a customary and usual practice among seafood processors. Based on its records, FDA estimates that there are 15,000 processors and 4,100 importers. FDA estimates that 50 processors will undertake the initial preparation of a hazard analysis and HAACP plan (§ 123.6(a),(b), and (c)). FDA estimates the burden for the initial preparation of a hazard analysis and HAACP plan to be 16 hours per processor for a total burden of 800 hours. FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will undertake and keep records of 4 corrective action plans (§ 123.6(c)(5)) for a total of 60,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.30 hours for a total burden of 18,000 hours. FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will annually reassess their hazard analysis and HACCP plan (§ 123.8(a)(1) and (c)). FDA estimates the burden for the reassessment of the hazard analysis and HAACP plan to be 4 hours per processor for a total burden of 60,000 hours. FDA estimates that all importers (4,100 importers) will take affirmative steps to verify compliance of imports and prepare 80 records of their verification activities (§ 123.12(a)(2)(ii)) for a total of 328,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.20 hours for a total burden of 65,600 hours. FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will document the monitoring of critical control points VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:14 Jun 17, 2010 Jkt 220001 (§ 123.6(c)(7)) at 280 records per processor for a total of 4,200,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.30 hours for a total burden of 1,260,000 hours. FDA estimates that 40 percent of all processors (6,000 processors) will maintain records of any corrective actions taken due to a deviation from a critical limit (§ 123.7(d)) at 4 records per processor for a total of 24,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 2,400 hours. FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will maintain records of the calibration of processmonitoring instruments and the performing of any periodic end-product and in-process testing (§ 123.8(d)) at 47 records per processor for a total of 705,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 70,500 hours. FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will maintain sanitation control records (§ 123.11(c)) at 280 records per processor for a total of 4,200,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 420,000 hours. FDA estimates that all importers (4,100 importers) will maintain records that verify that the fish and fishery products they offer for import into the United States were processed in accordance with the HACCP and sanitation provisions set forth in part 123 (§ 123.12(c)). FDA estimates that 80 records will be prepared per importer for a total of 328,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 32,800 hours. FDA estimates that 1 percent of all importers (41 importers) will require new written verification procedures to verify compliance of imports (§ 123.12(a)(2)). FDA estimates the burden for preparing the new procedures to be 4 hours per importer for a total burden of 164 hours. Dated: June 14, 2010. David Dorsey, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget. [FR Doc. 2010–14817 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Information Clearinghouses Customer Satisfaction Survey SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 to provide opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is giving public notice that the agency proposes to request reinstatement of an information collection activity for which approval expired on February 28, 2010. Proposed Collection Title: NIDDK Information Clearinghouses Customer Satisfaction Survey. Type of Information Requested: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired. The OMB control number 0925–0480 expired on February 28, 2010. Need and Use of Information Collection: NIDDK is conducting a survey to assess the efficiency and effectiveness of services provided by NIDDK’s three clearinghouses: The National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC); the National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse (NDDIC); and the National Kidney and Urologic Diseases Information Clearinghouse (NKUDIC). The survey responds to Executive Order 12821, ‘‘Setting Customer Service Standards,’’ which requires agencies and departments to identify and survey their ‘‘customers to determine the kind and quality of service they want and their level of satisfaction with existing services.’’ Frequency of Response: On occasion. Affected Public: Individuals or households; business and for profit organizations; not-for-profit agencies. Type of Respondents: Physicians, health care professionals, patients, family and friends of patients. The annual reporting burden is as follows: Estimated number of respondents: 7,079; estimated number of responses per respondent: 1; estimated average burden hours per response: 0.025; and estimated total annual burden hours requested: 177. The E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM 18JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34746-34748]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0182]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Procedures for the 
Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish and Fishery Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by July 
19, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received,

[[Page 34747]]

OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of 
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 
202-395-7285, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments 
should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0354. Also 
include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this 
document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Denver Presley, Jr., Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3793.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance.

Procedures for the Safe and Sanitary Processing and Importing of Fish 
and Fishery Products--(OMB Control Number 0910-0354)--Extension

    FDA regulations in part 123 (21 CFR part 123) mandate the 
application of hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) 
principles to the processing of seafood. HACCP is a preventive system 
of hazard control designed to help ensure the safety of foods. The 
regulations were issued under FDA's statutory authority to regulate 
food safety, including section 402(a)(1) and (a)(4) of the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(1) and (a)(4)).
    Certain provisions in part 123 require that processors and 
importers of seafood collect and record information. The HACCP records 
compiled and maintained by a seafood processor primarily consist of the 
periodic observations recorded at selected monitoring points during 
processing and packaging operations, as called for in a processor's 
HACCP plan (e.g., the values for processing times, temperatures, 
acidity, etc., as observed at critical control points). The primary 
purpose of HACCP records is to permit a processor to verify that 
products have been produced within carefully established processing 
parameters (critical limits) that ensure that hazards have been 
avoided.
    HACCP records are normally reviewed by appropriately trained 
employees at the end of a production lot or at the end of a day or week 
of production to verify that control limits have been maintained, or 
that appropriate corrective actions were taken if the critical limits 
were not maintained. Such verification activities are essential to 
ensure that the HACCP system is working as planned. A review of these 
records during the conduct of periodic plant inspections also permits 
FDA to determine whether the products have been consistently processed 
in conformance with appropriate HACCP food safety controls.
    Section 123.12 requires that importers of seafood products take 
affirmative steps and maintain records that verify that the fish and 
fishery products they offer for import into the United States were 
processed in accordance with the HACCP and sanitation provisions set 
forth in part 123. These records are also to be made available for 
review by FDA as provided in Sec.  123.12(c).
    The time and costs of these recordkeeping activities will vary 
considerably among processors and importers of fish and fishery 
products, depending on the type and number of products involved, and on 
the nature of the equipment or instruments required to monitor critical 
control points. The burden estimate in table 1 of this document 
includes only those collections of information under the seafood HACCP 
regulations that are not already required under other statutes and 
regulations. The estimate also does not include collections of 
information that are a usual and customary part of businesses' normal 
activities. For example, the tagging and labeling of molluscan 
shellfish (Sec.  1240.60 (21 CFR 1240.60)) is a customary and usual 
practice among seafood processors. Consequently, the estimates in table 
1 account only for information collection and recording requirements 
attributable to part 123. Respondents to this collection of information 
include processors and importers of seafood.
    In the Federal Register of April 9, 2010 (75 FR 18211), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                                   Table 1.--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              No. of       Annual Frequency  of     Total Annual        Hours per
                   21 CFR Section\2\                      Recordkeepers      Recordkeeping\3\         Records           Record\4\         Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.6(a),(b), and (c)                                                  50                     1                 50              16.00                800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.6(c)(5)                                                        15,000                     4             60,000               0.30             18,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.8(a)(1) and (c)                                                15,000                     1             15,000               4.00             60,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.12(a)(2)(ii)                                                    4,100                    80            328,000               0.20             65,600
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.6(c)(7)                                                        15,000                   280          4,200,000               0.30          1,260,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.7(d)                                                            6,000                     4             24,000               0.10              2,400
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.8(d)                                                           15,000                    47            705,000               0.10             70,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.11(c)                                                          15,000                   280          4,200,000               0.10            420,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.12(c)                                                           4,100                    80            328,000               0.10             32,800
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
123.12(a)(2)                                                           41                     1                 41               4.00                164
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                                                                                                          1,930,264
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\These estimates include the information collection requirements in the following sections: Sec.   123.16--Smoked Fish--process controls (see Sec.
  123.6(b)); Sec.   123.28(a)--Source Controls--molluscan shellfish (see Sec.   123.6(b)); Sec.   123.28(c) and (d)--Records--molluscan shellfish (see
  Sec.   123.6(c)(7)).

[[Page 34748]]

 
\3\Based on an estimated 280 working days per year.
\4\Estimated average time per 8-hour workday unless one-time response.

    FDA bases this hour burden estimate on its experience with the 
application of HACCP principles in food processing. Further, the 
burdens have been estimated using typical small seafood processing 
firms as a model because these firms represent a significant proportion 
of the industry. The hour burden of HACCP recordkeeping activities will 
vary considerably among processors and importers of fish and fishery 
products, depending on the size of the facility and complexity of the 
HACCP control scheme (i.e., the number of products and the number of 
hazards controlled); the daily frequency that control points are 
monitored and values recorded; and also on the extent that data 
recording time and cost are minimized by the use of automated data 
logging technology. The burden estimate does not include burden hours 
for activities that are a usual and customary part of businesses' 
normal activities. For example, the tagging and labeling of molluscan 
shellfish (Sec.  1240.60) is a customary and usual practice among 
seafood processors.
    Based on its records, FDA estimates that there are 15,000 
processors and 4,100 importers. FDA estimates that 50 processors will 
undertake the initial preparation of a hazard analysis and HAACP plan 
(Sec.  123.6(a),(b), and (c)). FDA estimates the burden for the initial 
preparation of a hazard analysis and HAACP plan to be 16 hours per 
processor for a total burden of 800 hours. FDA estimates that all 
processors (15,000 processors) will undertake and keep records of 4 
corrective action plans (Sec.  123.6(c)(5)) for a total of 60,000 
records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to 
be 0.30 hours for a total burden of 18,000 hours.
    FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will annually 
reassess their hazard analysis and HACCP plan (Sec.  123.8(a)(1) and 
(c)). FDA estimates the burden for the reassessment of the hazard 
analysis and HAACP plan to be 4 hours per processor for a total burden 
of 60,000 hours.
    FDA estimates that all importers (4,100 importers) will take 
affirmative steps to verify compliance of imports and prepare 80 
records of their verification activities (Sec.  123.12(a)(2)(ii)) for a 
total of 328,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the preparation 
of each record to be 0.20 hours for a total burden of 65,600 hours.
    FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will document 
the monitoring of critical control points (Sec.  123.6(c)(7)) at 280 
records per processor for a total of 4,200,000 records. FDA estimates 
the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.30 hours for a 
total burden of 1,260,000 hours.
    FDA estimates that 40 percent of all processors (6,000 processors) 
will maintain records of any corrective actions taken due to a 
deviation from a critical limit (Sec.  123.7(d)) at 4 records per 
processor for a total of 24,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for 
the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 
2,400 hours.
    FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will maintain 
records of the calibration of process-monitoring instruments and the 
performing of any periodic end-product and in-process testing (Sec.  
123.8(d)) at 47 records per processor for a total of 705,000 records. 
FDA estimates the burden for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 
hours for a total burden of 70,500 hours.
    FDA estimates that all processors (15,000 processors) will maintain 
sanitation control records (Sec.  123.11(c)) at 280 records per 
processor for a total of 4,200,000 records. FDA estimates the burden 
for the preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden 
of 420,000 hours.
    FDA estimates that all importers (4,100 importers) will maintain 
records that verify that the fish and fishery products they offer for 
import into the United States were processed in accordance with the 
HACCP and sanitation provisions set forth in part 123 (Sec.  
123.12(c)). FDA estimates that 80 records will be prepared per importer 
for a total of 328,000 records. FDA estimates the burden for the 
preparation of each record to be 0.10 hours for a total burden of 
32,800 hours.
    FDA estimates that 1 percent of all importers (41 importers) will 
require new written verification procedures to verify compliance of 
imports (Sec.  123.12(a)(2)). FDA estimates the burden for preparing 
the new procedures to be 4 hours per importer for a total burden of 164 
hours.

    Dated: June 14, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-14817 Filed 6-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.