Suspension of Nationwide Permit 21, 34711-34714 [2010-14778]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
(3) Private organizations (including
educational institutions) and
individuals for authorized health
research in the interest of the Federal
government and the public. When not
considered mandatory, patient
identification data shall be eliminated
from records used for research studies.
(4) Officials and employees of the
National Research Council in
cooperative studies of the National
History of Disease of prognosis and of
epidemiology. Each study in which the
records of members and former
members of the Air Force are used must
be approved by the Surgeon General of
the Air Force.
(5) Officials and employees of local
and state governments and agencies in
the performance of their official duties
pursuant to the laws and regulations
governing local control of
communicable diseases, preventive
medicine and safety programs, child
abuse and other public health and
welfare programs.
(6) Authorized surveying bodies for
professional certification and
accreditations.
(7) The individual’s organization or
government agency as necessary when
required by Federal statute, Executive
Order or by treaty.
The DoD ‘‘Blanket Routine Uses’’
published at the beginning of the Air
Force’s compilation of record system
notices apply to this system, except as
stipulated in ‘Notes’ below.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
NOTE: Records of identity, diagnosis,
prognosis or treatment of any client/patient,
irrespective of whether or when he/she
ceases to be a client/patient, maintained in
connection with the performance of any
alcohol/drug abuse treatment function
conducted, requested, or directly or
indirectly assisted by any department or
agency of the United States, shall, except as
provided herein, be confidential and be
disclosed only for the purposes and under
the circumstances expressly authorized in 42
U.S.C. 290dd–2. These statutes take
precedence over the Privacy Act of 1974 in
regard to accessibility of such records except
to the individual to whom the record
pertains. The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ do
not apply to these types of records.
Note: This system of records contains
individually identifiable health information.
The DoD Health Information Privacy
Regulation (DoD 6025.18–R) issued pursuant
to the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996, applies to most
such health information. DoD 6025.18–R may
place additional procedural requirements on
the uses and disclosures of such information
beyond those found in the Privacy Act of
1974 or mentioned in this system of records
notice.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Paper records and electronic storage
media.
RETRIEVABILITY:
By name, Social Security Number
(SSN), or by Military Service Number.
SAFEGUARDS:
Records are accessed by commanders
of medical centers, hospitals and
clinics; by custodian of the record
system; and by person(s) responsible for
servicing the record system in
performance of their official duties and
by authorized personnel who are
properly screened and cleared by needto-know. Records are stored in locked
rooms and cabinets, and access to
automated records is controlled and
limited.
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL:
While on active duty, the Health
Record of a U.S. military member is
maintained at the medical unit at which
the person receives treatment.
On separation or retirement, records
are forwarded to the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Records Management
Center in St. Louis, MO or to the
appropriate Veterans Affairs Regional
Office if a Veterans Affairs claim has
been filed.
Records of non-active duty personnel
are mailed to the next military medical
facility at which treatment will be
received or the records are retained at
the treating facility until 2 years after
the end of the calendar year of the last
date of treatment and then retired to the
National Personnel Record Center
(NPRC) or other designated depository,
such as, but not limited to, Medical
Director, American Red Cross,
Washington, DC 20006 for Red Cross
personnel. At NPRC all inpatient,
outpatient, and APV records are
retained for 50 years after date of last
document.
In addition, military records sent to
the DVA after 1 May 1994 are
maintained for 50 years after date of last
document.
The Surgeon General, Headquarters
United States Air Force.
Chief of Air Force Reserve,
Headquarters United States Air Force.
Director of Air National Guard,
Headquarters United States Air Force.
Commanders of medical centers,
hospitals, clinics, medical aid stations:
Commander, Air Force Personnel
Center. Official mailing addresses are
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Individuals seeking to determine
whether this system of records contains
information about themselves should
address inquiries to or visit the system
manager. Official mailing addresses are
published as an appendix to the Air
Force’s compilation of record systems
notices.
Requester must submit full name,
Social Security Number (SSN) (or
Military Service Number) through
whom eligibility for care is established:
date (at least year) treatment was
provided; name of facility providing
treatment; and whether treatment was as
inpatient or outpatient.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking access to records
about themselves contained in this
system should address requests to the
system manager. Official mailing
addresses are published as an appendix
to the Air Force’s compilation of
systems notices.
Requester must submit full name,
Social Security Number (SSN) (or
Military Service Number) through
whom eligibility for care is established:
date (at least year) treatment was
provided; name of facility providing
treatment; and whether treatment was as
inpatient or outpatient.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The Air Force rules for accessing
records and for contesting contents and
appealing initial agency determinations
are published in Air Force Instruction
37–132; 32 CFR part 1806b; or may be
obtained from the system manager.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Physicians and other patient care
providers such as nurses, dietitians, and
physicians assistants. Administrative
forms are completed by appropriate
military or civilian officials.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
[FR Doc. 2010–14712 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
SYSTEM MANAGER(S) AND ADDRESS:
Frm 00029
published as an appendix to the Air
Force’s compilation of system notices.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
STORAGE:
PO 00000
34711
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
ZRIN 0710–ZA04
Suspension of Nationwide Permit 21
AGENCY: United States Army Corps of
Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
34712
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is immediately
suspending Nationwide Permit (NWP)
21, which authorizes discharges of
dredged or fill material into waters of
the United States for surface coal
mining activities, in the Appalachian
region of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
This suspension is an interim measure
to protect the aquatic environment
while we evaluate modification of NWP
21 or until NWP 21 expires in 2012.
While the suspension is in effect,
individuals who seek authorization for
discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States for
surface coal mining projects in the
affected region will have to obtain
Department of the Army authorization
under the Clean Water Act (CWA),
through the individual permit process.
Individual permits will result in
increased public involvement in the
permit evaluation process, including an
opportunity for public comment on
individual projects. NWP 21 activities
that have been verified by District
Engineers prior to the effective date of
this suspension in the affected region
continue to be authorized by that NWP
until it expires on March 18, 2012,
unless the District Engineer takes action
to modify, suspend or revoke a
particular NWP authorization on a caseby-case basis in accordance with the
procedures at 33 CFR 330.5(d). District
engineers may not modify previously
issued NWP 21 verifications in this
region to authorize additional
discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States; such
discharges must be applied for and
evaluated under the individual permit
process. This suspension of NWP 21
does not apply to other regions of the
United States. The suspension will
remain in effect until the Corps takes
further action on NWP 21 or until NWP
21 expires on March 18, 2012. The
Corps will publish its decision
concerning the proposed NWP 21
modification in a future Federal
Register notice.
DATES: The effective date of the
suspension of NWP 21 in the
Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
West Virginia is June 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Attn: CECW–CO (Attn: Ms.
Desiree Hann), 441 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20314–1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Desiree Hann, Headquarters, Operations
and Regulatory Community of Practice,
Washington, DC at 202–761–4560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background
On June 11, 2009, the Army, the U.S.
Department of the Interior, and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) that addresses
actions to strengthen the environmental
review of Appalachian surface coal
mining. A copy of this MOU is available
at: https://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/
Pages/moumoas.aspx. The MOU
includes an Interagency Action Plan
(IAP) that was developed to reduce the
adverse environmental impacts of
surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
West Virginia, while ensuring that
future mining remains consistent with
the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the
Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act. One of the action
items in the MOU was for the Corps to
issue a public notice proposing to
modify NWP 21, which authorizes
discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States for
surface coal mining activities, to
preclude its use to authorize the
discharge of fill material into streams
and other waters of the United States for
surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian region of those six states,
and to seek public comment on the
proposed action.
In accordance with the Corps
regulations for implementing the
Nationwide Permit Program, an
interested party may request that the
Corps consider changes to existing
NWPs, including modification or
revocation of any of those NWPs, at any
time (see 33 CFR 330.5(b)(1)). Based
upon the concerns expressed in the June
11, 2009 MOU and its IAP about the
potential for more than minimal
individual and cumulative
environmental effects of surface coal
mining activities in certain states in
Appalachia, the Corps agreed to seek
public comment on a proposal to
modify and suspend NWP 21 in the
Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
West Virginia. That proposal was
published in the July 15, 2009, issue of
the Federal Register (75 FR 34311). All
38 Corps districts also published local
public notices to inform citizens of the
proposal and their opportunity to
provide comments or request public
hearings.
Impacts to waters of the United States
that typically occur in association with
surface coal mining activities include
valley fill construction activities (e.g.,
the placement of rock and soil into
headwater streams and their valleys),
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
sediment pond construction, road
construction, and slurry impoundment
construction. Activities authorized by
NWP 21 have impacted thousands of
linear feet of ephemeral, intermittent,
and perennial streams at numerous
mine sites across the region.
Compensatory mitigation has been
required to ensure NWP 21 activities
result in only minimal individual and
cumulative adverse environmental
effects. This mitigation must be
successfully implemented to adequately
offset the unavoidable impacts to waters
authorized by NWP 21. Since 2002, the
Corps has collected information with
respect to the technical challenges
associated with mitigation required for
surface coal mine permits issued in
Appalachia. Based on this information,
and based on the 2008 mitigation rule,
which emphasizes the importance of
selecting mitigation sites based on their
likelihood to be ecologically successful,
we better understand how site selection
and project design criteria could be
improved to provide ecologically
successful compensation to offset
unavoidable losses of jurisdictional
waters associated with surface coal
mining projects.
The July 15, 2009, proposal involved
two actions concerning NWP 21. First,
the Corps proposed to modify NWP 21
to prohibit its use to authorize
discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States for
surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
West Virginia until it expires on March
18, 2012. Second, the Corps proposed to
suspend NWP 21, and to require
individual permit reviews in the
Appalachian region of these states, until
it completes the longer term process of
deciding whether to modify NWP 21.
The suspension of NWP 21 in these
states would provide enhanced
protection of aquatic resources while
the Corps evaluates the proposal to
modify NWP 21 by requiring surface
coal mining projects in the affected
region to obtain individual permits
under the CWA, which would include
increased public involvement in the
permit review process, and an
opportunity for public comment on
individual projects.
The Corps regulations governing the
issuance, modification, suspension, or
revocation of NWPs are found at 33 CFR
330.5. As described in those regulations,
suspension is a measure for halting the
use of an NWP in the short-term in
response to identified concerns about
impacts to waters of the United States
or other public interest review factors,
while modification of an NWP is the
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
long-term solution for addressing those
concerns. The suspension will provide
additional protection to the aquatic
environment until the Corps makes its
decision on the future of NWP 21.
In accordance with the suspension
and modification procedures provided
in the NWP regulations, the Corps
invited public comment, as well as an
opportunity to request public hearings.
The initial comment period was
extended from August 14, 2009 to
September 14, 2009 (see 74 FR 40815).
In response to requests received from a
number of interested parties, the Corps
held public hearings in each of the six
states proposed to be affected by the
suspension and modification of NWP
21. The public hearings were
announced in the September 10, 2009,
issue of the Federal Register (74 FR
46582) and the comment period was
extended again to October 26, 2009, to
allow written comments to be submitted
to supplement the hearing records.
In response to the July 15, 2009,
Federal Register notice, the Corps
received approximately 23,000 written
comments, of which approximately 950
were non-form letters expressing
support for the suspension of NWP 21
and approximately 750 were non-form
letters expressing opposition to the
suspension of NWP 21. Comments may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov
under docket number COE–2009–0032.
Duplicate comments are not posted in
the regulations.gov docket.
The public hearings were held in the
following cities on October 13–15, 2009:
Charleston, West Virginia; Cambridge,
Ohio; Pikeville, Kentucky; Knoxville,
Tennessee; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania;
and Big Stone Gap, Virginia.
Approximately 400 people provided
oral testimony at these public hearings,
with approximately two-thirds of the
testimony in opposition to the proposed
action of suspension and one-third in
support of the proposed suspension.
In response to the Federal Register
notice and oral testimony collected at
the public hearings, approximately
16,500 commenters expressed support
for the proposed suspension and 6,500
objected to the proposed suspension.
Most of the commenters supporting the
proposed suspension stated that NWP
21 activities have resulted in more than
minimal individual and cumulative
adverse effects on the aquatic
environment, and commented on other
public interest review factors.
Commenters opposing the proposed
suspension said that the current rules
governing implementation of NWP 21,
including the pre-construction
notification (PCN) requirement and
stringent review process, provide the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Corps with the authority to exercise
discretionary authority and require an
individual permit if the impacts on the
aquatic environment will be more than
minimal on an individual or cumulative
basis, or if warranted by other public
interest review factors. A more detailed
summary of the comments is provided
in the decision document for the
suspension of NWP 21, which is
available at the Corps Headquarters
‘‘National Notices and Program
Initiatives’’ page at: https://
www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/
nnpi.aspx and the regulations.gov Web
site under docket number COE–2009–
0032.
The same commenters also provided
comments on the proposed modification
of NWP 21, but those comments will be
summarized and addressed in a separate
document at a later time.
Suspension of NWP 21
To make a decision on the proposed
suspension, the Corps considered
comments, established decision criteria,
and evaluated alternatives. This
evaluation is provided in the decision
memorandum referenced above. The
Corps has concerns that continued use
of this permit in the Appalachian region
of these six states may result in more
than minimal individual and
cumulative adverse effects to aquatic
resources. Under Section 404(e) of the
CWA, only those activities that result in
no more than minimal individual and
cumulative adverse effects to the aquatic
environment may be authorized under a
NWP. Activities resulting in more than
minimal individual and cumulative
impacts to the aquatic environment
cannot be authorized by NWPs or other
general permits. We have determined
that suspension of this permit in the
Appalachian region of these six states is
necessary to ensure that the Corps
evaluates these complex activities,
through the individual permit process,
while it considers whether to modify
NWP 21.
NWP 21 is suspended in the following
counties of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and
West Virginia:
Kentucky: Adair, Bath, Bell, Boyd,
Breathitt, Carter, Casey, Clark, Clay,
Clinton, Cumberland, Edmonson,
Elliott, Estill, Fleming, Floyd, Garrard,
Green, Greenup, Harlan, Hart, Jackson,
Johnson, Knott, Knox, Laurel, Lawrence,
Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Lewis, Lincoln,
McCreary, Madison, Magoffin, Martin,
Menifee, Metcalfe, Monroe,
Montgomery, Morgan, Nicholas,
Owsley, Perry, Pike, Powell, Pulaski,
Robertson, Rockcastle, Rowan, Russell,
Wayne, Whitley, and Wolfe.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34713
Ohio: Adams, Ashtabula, Athens,
Belmont, Brown, Carroll, Clermont,
Columbiana, Coshocton, Gallia,
Guernsey, Harrison, Highland, Hocking,
Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lawrence,
Mahoning, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan,
Muskingum, Noble, Perry, Pike, Ross,
Scioto, Trumbull, Tuscarawas, Vinton,
and Washington.
Pennsylvania: Allegheny, Armstrong,
Beaver, Bedford, Blair, Bradford, Butler,
Cambria, Cameron, Carbon, Centre,
Clarion, Clearfield, Clinton, Columbia,
Crawford, Elk, Erie, Fayette, Forest,
Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana,
Jefferson, Juniata, Lackawanna,
Lawrence, Luzerne, Lycoming, McKean,
Mercer, Mifflin, Monroe, Montour,
Northumberland, Perry, Pike, Potter,
Schuylkill, Snyder, Somerset, Sullivan,
Susquehanna, Tioga, Union, Venango,
Warren, Washington, Wayne,
Westmoreland, and Wyoming.
Tennessee: Anderson, Bledsoe,
Blount, Bradley, Campbell, Cannon,
Carter, Claiborne, Clay, Cocke, Coffee,
Cumberland, De Kalb, Fentress,
Franklin, Grainger, Greene, Grundy,
Hamblen, Hamilton, Hancock, Hawkins,
Jackson, Jefferson, Johnson, Knox,
Lawrence, Lewis, Loudon, McMinn,
Macon, Marion, Meigs, Monroe,
Morgan, Overton, Pickett, Polk, Putnam,
Rhea, Roane, Scott, Sequatchie, Sevier,
Smith, Sullivan, Unicoi, Union, Van
Buren, Warren, Washington, and White.
Virginia: Alleghany, Bath, Bland,
Botetourt, Buchanan, Carroll, Craig,
Dickenson, Floyd, Giles, Grayson,
Henry, Highland, Lee, Montgomery,
Patrick, Pulaski, Rockbridge, Russell,
Scott, Smyth, Tazewell, Washington,
Wise/Norton, and Wythe.
West Virginia: All counties.
The above list of counties is based on
the Appalachian Regional Commission’s
list of counties in Appalachia.
This suspension of NWP 21 goes into
effect on June 18, 2010. The suspension
temporarily prohibits the use of NWP 21
to authorize discharges of dredged or fill
material into waters of the United States
for surface coal mining activities in
these Appalachian counties, until the
Corps makes a final determination on
the proposed modification of NWP 21 or
until NWP 21 expires in March 2012. In
light of the suspension, project
proponents for surface coal mining
activities involving discharges of
dredged or fill material into waters of
the United States will have to obtain
Department of the Army authorization
under the Clean Water Act, through the
individual permit process.
Using the individual permit process
for those activities will provide more
information for the Corps to consider in
making decisions on these permit
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
34714
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
applications because of increased public
involvement, such as the opportunity to
comment on public notices for
individual surface coal mining activities
in Appalachia. This additional
information could help improve not
only the Corps analysis of potential
individual and cumulative adverse
effects of the proposed activity on the
aquatic environment, but also on the
potential adverse effects on other public
interest review factors listed at 33 CFR
320.4(a)(1), such as conservation,
aesthetics, economics, land use,
recreation, fish and wildlife values,
energy needs, and general
considerations of property ownership,
to the extent that those public interest
factors are relevant to waters of the
United States subject to CWA
jurisdiction and within the Corps
Federal control and responsibility.
Concurrent with this Federal Register
notice, all Corps districts will issue
local public notices announcing the
suspension of NWP 21 as of the effective
date identified above.
Grandfathering of Existing NWP 21
Authorizations
Today’s action prohibits District
Engineers from issuing NWP 21
verifications in response to PCNs for
surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian counties listed above
during the period of suspension. In
other words, District Engineers cannot
continue to process NWP 21 PCNs that
are pending as of June 18, 2010 or
accept new or revised NWP 21 PCNs for
surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian region of those six states
unless the suspension is lifted and NWP
21 is reinstated in this region.
Proponents of proposed surface coal
mining activities in the Appalachian
region of these six states will have to
submit applications for individual
permits instead of NWP 21 PCNs.
NWP 21 activities that have been
verified by District Engineers prior to
June 18, 2010 in the Appalachian region
of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia,
continue to be authorized by that NWP
until it expires on March 18, 2012,
unless the District Engineer takes action
to modify, suspend or revoke a
particular NWP authorization on a caseby-case basis in accordance with the
procedures at 33 CFR § 330.5(d). District
engineers may not modify previously
issued NWP 21 verifications to
authorize additional discharges of
dredged or fill material into waters of
the United States in the affected
Appalachian counties; such discharges
must be applied for and evaluated under
the individual permit process.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Environmental Documentation
The decision document for the
suspension of NWP 21 is available at the
Corps Headquarters ‘‘National Notices
and Program Initiatives’’ page at:
https://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/
Pages/nnpi.aspx and the regulations.gov
Web site under docket number COE–
2009–0032. It is also available by
contacting Headquarters, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Operations and
Regulatory Community of Practice, 441
G Street, NW, Washington, DC 20314–
1000.
Authority
We are suspending NWP 21 under the
authority of Section 404(e) of the Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section
10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899
(33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.).
Dated: June 8, 2010.
Approved by:
R.L. Van Antwerp,
Lieutenant General, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2010–14778 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Updated Record of Decision (ROD) for
Revised Army Growth and Force;
Structure Realignment Decisions
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of the Army
announces the availability of an
updated ROD for Army Growth and
Force Structure Realignment. This ROD
explains that the Army has modified
previous decisions made in December
2007 to support Army growth and force
structure realignment. The Army’s
decision at the time grew the Army by
six Infantry Brigade Combat Teams
(IBCTs), eight active component support
brigades, and associated growth in
smaller combat support and combat
service support units required to
complement the U.S. Army’s overall
force structure growth. The decision
also relocated two Heavy Brigade
Combat Teams (HBCTs) from Europe to
the continental United States. This
updated ROD details how the Army has
modified growth and realignment
decisions to better meet operational
mission requirements. Specifically, the
original decision is being modified by
this updated ROD in the following
ways:
• Army growth is stopped at 45 active
component BCTs instead of 48;
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• One IBCT has been established as
the 43rd BCT at Fort Carson, CO;
• The 44th BCT has been activated at
Fort Bliss, TX; and
• The 45th BCT was established at
Fort Stewart, GA, as an IBCT.
• The Army will not stand up new
growth IBCTs at Fort Bliss, TX; Fort
Stewart, GA; or Fort Carson, CO in 2011
as was originally announced in the 2007
ROD. In place of these BCTs, the Army
will establish additional combat support
units at locations across the Army to
better meet mission requirements and
man units for upcoming deployments.
• The Army will convert a Heavy
Brigade Combat Team (HBCT) (the 1st
Brigade of the 1st Armored Division (1⁄1
AD)) to a Stryker Brigade Combat Team
(SBCT) beginning in 2011 at Fort Bliss,
TX. This conversion involves the
stationing of approximately 450
additional Soldiers and their equipment
at Fort Bliss.
• An HBCT will no longer be
returning from Germany to White Sands
Missile Range in fiscal year 2013. The
stationing of HBCTs currently assigned
to Germany will be reassessed in light
of the Army’s global mission
requirements.
These modifications to the original
Grow the Army decision will better
allow the Army to respond to security
threats in an unpredictable global
security environment.
ADDRESSES: A request for copy of the
ROD can be sent to the Public Affairs
Office, U.S. Army Environmental
Command, Building E4460, Attention:
IMAE–PA, 5179 Hoadley Road,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010–
5401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC
David Patterson, Media Relations
Division, Office of the Chief of Public
Affairs, at (703) 697–7592.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In January
2007, the President asked Congress for
authority to increase the overall strength
of the Army by 74,200 Soldiers over the
next five years. This growth was
intended to mitigate shortages in units,
Soldiers, and time to train that would
otherwise inhibit the Army from
meeting readiness goals and supporting
strategic requirements. The Department
of the Army prepared a Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
that evaluated the potential
environmental and socioeconomic
effects associated with alternatives for
Army growth and realignment. In the
Final PEIS (published on October 26,
2007), the Army identified Alternative 3
as the preferred alternative. Alternative
3 (adds combat support and combat
service support units, as well as Army
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34711-34714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14778]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
ZRIN 0710-ZA04
Suspension of Nationwide Permit 21
AGENCY: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 34712]]
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is immediately
suspending Nationwide Permit (NWP) 21, which authorizes discharges of
dredged or fill material into waters of the United States for surface
coal mining activities, in the Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. This suspension
is an interim measure to protect the aquatic environment while we
evaluate modification of NWP 21 or until NWP 21 expires in 2012. While
the suspension is in effect, individuals who seek authorization for
discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
for surface coal mining projects in the affected region will have to
obtain Department of the Army authorization under the Clean Water Act
(CWA), through the individual permit process. Individual permits will
result in increased public involvement in the permit evaluation
process, including an opportunity for public comment on individual
projects. NWP 21 activities that have been verified by District
Engineers prior to the effective date of this suspension in the
affected region continue to be authorized by that NWP until it expires
on March 18, 2012, unless the District Engineer takes action to modify,
suspend or revoke a particular NWP authorization on a case-by-case
basis in accordance with the procedures at 33 CFR 330.5(d). District
engineers may not modify previously issued NWP 21 verifications in this
region to authorize additional discharges of dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States; such discharges must be applied for
and evaluated under the individual permit process. This suspension of
NWP 21 does not apply to other regions of the United States. The
suspension will remain in effect until the Corps takes further action
on NWP 21 or until NWP 21 expires on March 18, 2012. The Corps will
publish its decision concerning the proposed NWP 21 modification in a
future Federal Register notice.
DATES: The effective date of the suspension of NWP 21 in the
Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee,
Virginia, and West Virginia is June 18, 2010.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Attn: CECW-CO (Attn: Ms.
Desiree Hann), 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Desiree Hann, Headquarters,
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, Washington, DC at 202-
761-4560.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 11, 2009, the Army, the U.S. Department of the Interior,
and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency signed a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) that addresses actions to strengthen the
environmental review of Appalachian surface coal mining. A copy of this
MOU is available at: https://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/moumoas.aspx.
The MOU includes an Interagency Action Plan (IAP) that was developed to
reduce the adverse environmental impacts of surface coal mining
activities in the Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, while ensuring that future
mining remains consistent with the Clean Water Act (CWA) and the
Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. One of the action items in
the MOU was for the Corps to issue a public notice proposing to modify
NWP 21, which authorizes discharges of dredged or fill material into
waters of the United States for surface coal mining activities, to
preclude its use to authorize the discharge of fill material into
streams and other waters of the United States for surface coal mining
activities in the Appalachian region of those six states, and to seek
public comment on the proposed action.
In accordance with the Corps regulations for implementing the
Nationwide Permit Program, an interested party may request that the
Corps consider changes to existing NWPs, including modification or
revocation of any of those NWPs, at any time (see 33 CFR 330.5(b)(1)).
Based upon the concerns expressed in the June 11, 2009 MOU and its IAP
about the potential for more than minimal individual and cumulative
environmental effects of surface coal mining activities in certain
states in Appalachia, the Corps agreed to seek public comment on a
proposal to modify and suspend NWP 21 in the Appalachian region of
Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
That proposal was published in the July 15, 2009, issue of the Federal
Register (75 FR 34311). All 38 Corps districts also published local
public notices to inform citizens of the proposal and their opportunity
to provide comments or request public hearings.
Impacts to waters of the United States that typically occur in
association with surface coal mining activities include valley fill
construction activities (e.g., the placement of rock and soil into
headwater streams and their valleys), sediment pond construction, road
construction, and slurry impoundment construction. Activities
authorized by NWP 21 have impacted thousands of linear feet of
ephemeral, intermittent, and perennial streams at numerous mine sites
across the region. Compensatory mitigation has been required to ensure
NWP 21 activities result in only minimal individual and cumulative
adverse environmental effects. This mitigation must be successfully
implemented to adequately offset the unavoidable impacts to waters
authorized by NWP 21. Since 2002, the Corps has collected information
with respect to the technical challenges associated with mitigation
required for surface coal mine permits issued in Appalachia. Based on
this information, and based on the 2008 mitigation rule, which
emphasizes the importance of selecting mitigation sites based on their
likelihood to be ecologically successful, we better understand how site
selection and project design criteria could be improved to provide
ecologically successful compensation to offset unavoidable losses of
jurisdictional waters associated with surface coal mining projects.
The July 15, 2009, proposal involved two actions concerning NWP 21.
First, the Corps proposed to modify NWP 21 to prohibit its use to
authorize discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the
United States for surface coal mining activities in the Appalachian
region of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West
Virginia until it expires on March 18, 2012. Second, the Corps proposed
to suspend NWP 21, and to require individual permit reviews in the
Appalachian region of these states, until it completes the longer term
process of deciding whether to modify NWP 21. The suspension of NWP 21
in these states would provide enhanced protection of aquatic resources
while the Corps evaluates the proposal to modify NWP 21 by requiring
surface coal mining projects in the affected region to obtain
individual permits under the CWA, which would include increased public
involvement in the permit review process, and an opportunity for public
comment on individual projects.
The Corps regulations governing the issuance, modification,
suspension, or revocation of NWPs are found at 33 CFR 330.5. As
described in those regulations, suspension is a measure for halting the
use of an NWP in the short-term in response to identified concerns
about impacts to waters of the United States or other public interest
review factors, while modification of an NWP is the
[[Page 34713]]
long-term solution for addressing those concerns. The suspension will
provide additional protection to the aquatic environment until the
Corps makes its decision on the future of NWP 21.
In accordance with the suspension and modification procedures
provided in the NWP regulations, the Corps invited public comment, as
well as an opportunity to request public hearings. The initial comment
period was extended from August 14, 2009 to September 14, 2009 (see 74
FR 40815). In response to requests received from a number of interested
parties, the Corps held public hearings in each of the six states
proposed to be affected by the suspension and modification of NWP 21.
The public hearings were announced in the September 10, 2009, issue of
the Federal Register (74 FR 46582) and the comment period was extended
again to October 26, 2009, to allow written comments to be submitted to
supplement the hearing records.
In response to the July 15, 2009, Federal Register notice, the
Corps received approximately 23,000 written comments, of which
approximately 950 were non-form letters expressing support for the
suspension of NWP 21 and approximately 750 were non-form letters
expressing opposition to the suspension of NWP 21. Comments may be
viewed at https://www.regulations.gov under docket number COE-2009-0032.
Duplicate comments are not posted in the regulations.gov docket.
The public hearings were held in the following cities on October
13-15, 2009: Charleston, West Virginia; Cambridge, Ohio; Pikeville,
Kentucky; Knoxville, Tennessee; Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Big Stone
Gap, Virginia. Approximately 400 people provided oral testimony at
these public hearings, with approximately two-thirds of the testimony
in opposition to the proposed action of suspension and one-third in
support of the proposed suspension.
In response to the Federal Register notice and oral testimony
collected at the public hearings, approximately 16,500 commenters
expressed support for the proposed suspension and 6,500 objected to the
proposed suspension. Most of the commenters supporting the proposed
suspension stated that NWP 21 activities have resulted in more than
minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects on the aquatic
environment, and commented on other public interest review factors.
Commenters opposing the proposed suspension said that the current rules
governing implementation of NWP 21, including the pre-construction
notification (PCN) requirement and stringent review process, provide
the Corps with the authority to exercise discretionary authority and
require an individual permit if the impacts on the aquatic environment
will be more than minimal on an individual or cumulative basis, or if
warranted by other public interest review factors. A more detailed
summary of the comments is provided in the decision document for the
suspension of NWP 21, which is available at the Corps Headquarters
``National Notices and Program Initiatives'' page at: https://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/nnpi.aspx and the regulations.gov Web
site under docket number COE-2009-0032.
The same commenters also provided comments on the proposed
modification of NWP 21, but those comments will be summarized and
addressed in a separate document at a later time.
Suspension of NWP 21
To make a decision on the proposed suspension, the Corps considered
comments, established decision criteria, and evaluated alternatives.
This evaluation is provided in the decision memorandum referenced
above. The Corps has concerns that continued use of this permit in the
Appalachian region of these six states may result in more than minimal
individual and cumulative adverse effects to aquatic resources. Under
Section 404(e) of the CWA, only those activities that result in no more
than minimal individual and cumulative adverse effects to the aquatic
environment may be authorized under a NWP. Activities resulting in more
than minimal individual and cumulative impacts to the aquatic
environment cannot be authorized by NWPs or other general permits. We
have determined that suspension of this permit in the Appalachian
region of these six states is necessary to ensure that the Corps
evaluates these complex activities, through the individual permit
process, while it considers whether to modify NWP 21.
NWP 21 is suspended in the following counties of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia:
Kentucky: Adair, Bath, Bell, Boyd, Breathitt, Carter, Casey, Clark,
Clay, Clinton, Cumberland, Edmonson, Elliott, Estill, Fleming, Floyd,
Garrard, Green, Greenup, Harlan, Hart, Jackson, Johnson, Knott, Knox,
Laurel, Lawrence, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Lewis, Lincoln, McCreary,
Madison, Magoffin, Martin, Menifee, Metcalfe, Monroe, Montgomery,
Morgan, Nicholas, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Powell, Pulaski, Robertson,
Rockcastle, Rowan, Russell, Wayne, Whitley, and Wolfe.
Ohio: Adams, Ashtabula, Athens, Belmont, Brown, Carroll, Clermont,
Columbiana, Coshocton, Gallia, Guernsey, Harrison, Highland, Hocking,
Holmes, Jackson, Jefferson, Lawrence, Mahoning, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan,
Muskingum, Noble, Perry, Pike, Ross, Scioto, Trumbull, Tuscarawas,
Vinton, and Washington.
Pennsylvania: Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Bedford, Blair,
Bradford, Butler, Cambria, Cameron, Carbon, Centre, Clarion,
Clearfield, Clinton, Columbia, Crawford, Elk, Erie, Fayette, Forest,
Fulton, Greene, Huntingdon, Indiana, Jefferson, Juniata, Lackawanna,
Lawrence, Luzerne, Lycoming, McKean, Mercer, Mifflin, Monroe, Montour,
Northumberland, Perry, Pike, Potter, Schuylkill, Snyder, Somerset,
Sullivan, Susquehanna, Tioga, Union, Venango, Warren, Washington,
Wayne, Westmoreland, and Wyoming.
Tennessee: Anderson, Bledsoe, Blount, Bradley, Campbell, Cannon,
Carter, Claiborne, Clay, Cocke, Coffee, Cumberland, De Kalb, Fentress,
Franklin, Grainger, Greene, Grundy, Hamblen, Hamilton, Hancock,
Hawkins, Jackson, Jefferson, Johnson, Knox, Lawrence, Lewis, Loudon,
McMinn, Macon, Marion, Meigs, Monroe, Morgan, Overton, Pickett, Polk,
Putnam, Rhea, Roane, Scott, Sequatchie, Sevier, Smith, Sullivan,
Unicoi, Union, Van Buren, Warren, Washington, and White.
Virginia: Alleghany, Bath, Bland, Botetourt, Buchanan, Carroll,
Craig, Dickenson, Floyd, Giles, Grayson, Henry, Highland, Lee,
Montgomery, Patrick, Pulaski, Rockbridge, Russell, Scott, Smyth,
Tazewell, Washington, Wise/Norton, and Wythe.
West Virginia: All counties.
The above list of counties is based on the Appalachian Regional
Commission's list of counties in Appalachia.
This suspension of NWP 21 goes into effect on June 18, 2010. The
suspension temporarily prohibits the use of NWP 21 to authorize
discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
for surface coal mining activities in these Appalachian counties, until
the Corps makes a final determination on the proposed modification of
NWP 21 or until NWP 21 expires in March 2012. In light of the
suspension, project proponents for surface coal mining activities
involving discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the
United States will have to obtain Department of the Army authorization
under the Clean Water Act, through the individual permit process.
Using the individual permit process for those activities will
provide more information for the Corps to consider in making decisions
on these permit
[[Page 34714]]
applications because of increased public involvement, such as the
opportunity to comment on public notices for individual surface coal
mining activities in Appalachia. This additional information could help
improve not only the Corps analysis of potential individual and
cumulative adverse effects of the proposed activity on the aquatic
environment, but also on the potential adverse effects on other public
interest review factors listed at 33 CFR 320.4(a)(1), such as
conservation, aesthetics, economics, land use, recreation, fish and
wildlife values, energy needs, and general considerations of property
ownership, to the extent that those public interest factors are
relevant to waters of the United States subject to CWA jurisdiction and
within the Corps Federal control and responsibility.
Concurrent with this Federal Register notice, all Corps districts
will issue local public notices announcing the suspension of NWP 21 as
of the effective date identified above.
Grandfathering of Existing NWP 21 Authorizations
Today's action prohibits District Engineers from issuing NWP 21
verifications in response to PCNs for surface coal mining activities in
the Appalachian counties listed above during the period of suspension.
In other words, District Engineers cannot continue to process NWP 21
PCNs that are pending as of June 18, 2010 or accept new or revised NWP
21 PCNs for surface coal mining activities in the Appalachian region of
those six states unless the suspension is lifted and NWP 21 is
reinstated in this region.
Proponents of proposed surface coal mining activities in the
Appalachian region of these six states will have to submit applications
for individual permits instead of NWP 21 PCNs.
NWP 21 activities that have been verified by District Engineers
prior to June 18, 2010 in the Appalachian region of Kentucky, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia, continue to be
authorized by that NWP until it expires on March 18, 2012, unless the
District Engineer takes action to modify, suspend or revoke a
particular NWP authorization on a case-by-case basis in accordance with
the procedures at 33 CFR Sec. 330.5(d). District engineers may not
modify previously issued NWP 21 verifications to authorize additional
discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States
in the affected Appalachian counties; such discharges must be applied
for and evaluated under the individual permit process.
Environmental Documentation
The decision document for the suspension of NWP 21 is available at
the Corps Headquarters ``National Notices and Program Initiatives''
page at: https://www.usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/nnpi.aspx and the
regulations.gov Web site under docket number COE-2009-0032. It is also
available by contacting Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Operations and Regulatory Community of Practice, 441 G Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20314-1000.
Authority
We are suspending NWP 21 under the authority of Section 404(e) of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) and Section 10 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 et seq.).
Dated: June 8, 2010.
Approved by:
R.L. Van Antwerp,
Lieutenant General, U.S. Army, Commanding.
[FR Doc. 2010-14778 Filed 6-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P