Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and To Conduct Public Scoping Meetings, and Notice of Floodplains and Wetlands Involvement; Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc., 34720-34724 [2010-14760]
Download as PDF
34720
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Grant Administration: Projects
funded under this competition are
encouraged to budget for a two-day
meeting for project directors to be held
annually in Washington, DC.
4. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The
Department has established the
following Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) performance
measures for this program:
(1) For each high school served by the
project, the school’s graduation rate, as
defined in the State’s approved
accountability plan for Part A of Title I
of the ESEA, as well as the graduation
rates for the following subgroups:
(A) Major racial and ethnic groups;
(B) Students with disabilities;
(C) Students with limited English
proficiency; and
(D) Economically disadvantaged
students.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Note: The Department will identify each
school’s graduation rate, as well as the
graduation rates for the subgroups identified
in this section, using the data that are now
reported to the Department by SEAs using
the EDEN Submission System (ESS).
Grantees will not be required to provide
these data.
(2) The number and percentage of
students enrolled in grades 9 through 12
in schools or programs served by the
project who, during the most recent
school year, earned one quarter of the
credits necessary to graduate from high
school with a regular diploma.
(3)(A) The number and percentage of
students served by the project who had
not attended school for 60 or more
instructional days immediately prior to
their participation in the project; and
(B) The average daily attendance of
such students while participating in the
project.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
(4)(A) The number and percentage of
students served by the project during
the most recent school year who were
two or more years behind their expected
age and credit accumulation in high
school; and
(B) The number and percentage of
such students who earned one half or
more of the credits they need to
graduate with a regular diploma.
(5) For each school served by the
project that includes an eighth grade—
(A) The average daily attendance of
such school; and
(B) The number and percentage of
students enrolled in the eighth grade
who enrolled in ninth grade at the start
of the next school year.
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicators of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise
an applicant for a grant under this
program to give careful consideration to
these measures in conceptualizing the
approach and evaluation for its
proposed project. Each grantee will be
required to provide, in its annual
performance and final reports, data
about its progress in meeting these
measures.
VII. Agency Contacts
For Further Information Contact:
Theda Zawaiza, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
room 3E122, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 205–3783 or by e-mail:
hsgi@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to either program contact
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister. To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at this site.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 15, 2010.
´
Thelma Melendez de Santa Ana,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2010–14732 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[OE Docket No. PP–362]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
To Conduct Public Scoping Meetings,
and Notice of Floodplains and
Wetlands Involvement; Champlain
Hudson Power Express, Inc.
Department of Energy (DOE).
Notice of Intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and to conduct Public Scoping
Meetings; Notice of Floodplains and
Wetlands Involvement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy
(DOE) announces its intention to
prepare an EIS pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), the Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), and the DOE
NEPA implementing procedures (10
CFR part 1021) to assess the potential
environmental impacts from its
proposed Federal action of granting a
Presidential permit to Champlain
Hudson Power Express, Inc. (Champlain
Hudson) to construct, operate, maintain,
and connect a new electric transmission
line across the U.S.-Canada border in
northeastern New York State. The EIS,
Champlain Hudson Power Express
Transmission Line Project
Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/
EIS–0447), will address potential
environmental impacts from the
proposed action and the range of
reasonable alternatives.
The purpose of this Notice of Intent
(NOI) is to inform the public about the
proposed action, announce plans to
conduct seven public scoping meetings
in the vicinity of the proposed
transmission line, invite public
participation in the scoping process,
and solicit public comments for
consideration in establishing the scope
of the EIS. Because the proposed project
may involve actions in floodplains and
wetlands, in accordance with 10 CFR
part 1022, Compliance with Floodplain
and Wetland Environmental Review
Requirements, the draft EIS will include
a floodplain and wetland assessment as
appropriate, and the final EIS or record
of decision will include a floodplain
statement of findings.
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
DATES: DOE invites interested agencies,
organizations, Native American tribes,
and members of the public to submit
comments to assist in identifying
significant environmental issues and in
determining the appropriate scope of
the EIS. The public scoping period starts
with the publication of this Notice in
the Federal Register and will continue
until August 2, 2010. Written and oral
comments will be given equal weight,
and DOE will consider all comments
received or postmarked by August 2,
2010 in defining the scope of this EIS.
Comments received or postmarked after
that date will be considered to the
extent practicable.
Locations, dates, and start and end
times for the public scoping meetings
are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this NOI.
Requests to speak at any one or more
public scoping meeting(s) should be
received by Dr. Jerry Pell at the address
indicated below on or before July 6,
2010; requests received by that date will
be given priority in the speaking order.
However, requests to speak also may be
made at the scoping meetings.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the scope of
the EIS and requests to be added to the
document mailing list should be
addressed to: Dr. Jerry Pell, Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE–20), U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20585; by
electronic mail to Jerry.Pell@hq.doe.gov;
or by facsimile to 202–318–7761. For
general information on the DOE NEPA
process contact: Ms. Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance (GC–54), U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; by electronic
mail at askNEPA@hq.doe.gov; or by
facsimile at 202–586–7031.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Jerry Pell at the addresses above, or at
202–586–3362. For general information
on the DOE NEPA process, contact Ms.
Carol M. Borgstrom at 202–586–4600,
leave a message at 800–472–2756, or at
the addresses above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive
Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by E.O.
12038, requires that a Presidential
permit be issued by DOE before electric
transmission facilities may be
constructed, operated, maintained, or
connected at the U.S. international
border. The E.O. provides that a
Presidential permit may be issued after
a finding that the proposed project is
consistent with the public interest and
after favorable recommendations from
the U.S. Departments of State and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Defense. In determining consistency
with the public interest, DOE considers
the potential environmental impacts of
the proposed project under NEPA,
determines the project’s impact on
electric reliability (including whether
the proposed project would adversely
affect the operation of the U.S. electric
power supply system under normal and
contingency conditions), and considers
any other factors that DOE may find
relevant to the public interest. The
regulations implementing the E.O. have
been codified at 10 CFR parts 205.320–
205.329. DOE’s issuance of a
Presidential permit indicates that there
is no Federal objection to the project,
but does not mandate that the project be
undertaken.
Champlain Hudson applied on
January 27, 2010, to DOE’s Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability (OE) for a Presidential permit
to construct, operate, maintain, and
connect a 2,000-megawatt (MW) highvoltage direct current (HVDC) Voltage
Source Converter (VSC) controllable
transmission system from the Canadian
Province of Quebec to the New York
City and Southwestern Connecticut
regions. After due consideration of the
nature and extent of the proposed
project, including evaluation of the
‘‘Information Regarding Potential
Environmental Impacts’’ section of the
Presidential permit application, DOE
has determined that the appropriate
level of NEPA review for this project is
an EIS.
The proposed Federal action is the
granting of the Presidential permit and
it is anticipated that the project could
significantly affect the quality of the
human environment. Because the
proposed project may involve actions in
floodplains and wetlands, in accordance
with 10 CFR part 1022, Compliance
with Floodplain and Wetland
Environmental Review Requirements,
the draft EIS will include a floodplain
and wetland assessment as appropriate,
and the final EIS or record of decision
will include a floodplain statement of
findings.
DOE invites Tribal governments and
Federal, state, and local agencies with
jurisdiction by law or special expertise
with respect to environmental issues to
be cooperating agencies with respect to
the EIS, as defined at 40 CFR 1501.6.
Cooperating agencies have certain
responsibilities to support the NEPA
process, as specified at 40 CFR
1501.6(b). The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (anticipated), the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
Region 2, and the New York State
Departments of Environmental
Conservation and Public Service are
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34721
cooperating agencies with respect to this
EIS.
In addition, Champlain Hudson
applied to DOE on September 12, 2009,
for a Federal loan guarantee for the
proposed project in response to a DOE
competitive solicitation, ‘‘Federal Loan
Guarantees for Electric Power
Transmission Infrastructure Investment
Projects,’’ issued under section 1705,
Title XVII, of the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (EPAct). Section 406 of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act of 2009 (the ‘‘Recovery Act’’)
amended EPAct by adding section 1705.
This section is designed to address the
current economic conditions of the
Nation, in part by facilitating the
development of eligible renewable and
transmission projects that commence
construction no later than September
30, 2011. DOE is carrying out an
evaluation of the application submitted
by Champlain Hudson. Should DOE
decide to enter into the negotiation of a
possible loan guarantee with Champlain
Hudson, DOE would use this EIS to
meet its NEPA requirements in making
a determination of funding.
Applicant’s Proposal
The applicant’s proposed VSC
controllable transmission system
consists of two 1,000–MW HVDC
bipoles. A bipole consists of two
connected submarine or underground
cables, one of which is positively
charged, and the other negatively
charged. In total, four cables would be
laid between Quebec, Canada, and a
proposed converter station in Yonkers,
NY, where one bipole (two cables)
would be terminated. The converter
station would change the electrical
power from direct current to alternating
current. The remaining bipole (two
cables) would continue to a proposed
converter station in Bridgeport, CT.
Champlain Hudson’s proposed
transmission line would connect
renewable sources of power generation
in Canada with load centers in and
around the New York City and
southwestern Connecticut regions.
The project would originate at an
HVDC converter station near Hydro´
´
Quebec TransEnergie’s 765/315-kilovolt
(kV) Hertel substation, located southeast
of Montreal, and extend approximately
35 miles to the international border
between the United States and Canada,
crossing in Lake Champlain to the east
of the Town of Champlain, NY. Four
cables (two bipoles) would extend south
under Lake Champlain for
approximately 111 miles entirely within
the jurisdictional waters of New York
State. At the southern end of Lake
Champlain, the cables would exit the
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
34722
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
water just north of Lock C12 of the
Champlain Canal (Canal) in the town of
Whitehall, NY, and would be buried
within an existing railroad right-of-way
owned by Canadian Pacific Railway
(CP) for 1.7 miles. The cables would
enter the Canal just south of Lock C12
and continue under the Canal for 5.6
miles to Comstock, NY, and then utilize
another CP railroad right-of-way for 0.4
miles to circumvent Lock C11. The
cables would re-enter the canal just
south of Lock C11 and continue under
the Canal for 8.9 miles toward Lock C9
in Kingsbury, NY (there is no Lock C10).
North of Lock C9, the cables would exit
the Canal and would be buried for 0.5
miles within land owned by the New
York State Canal Corporation on the
eastern shore of Lock C9. The HVDC
cables would re-enter the Canal just
south of Lock C9 and continue under
the Canal for 2.7 miles toward Lock C8
in Fort Edward, NY.
The Upper Hudson River portion of
the Hudson River polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) site (USEPA
Identification Number NYD980763841)
stretches from Hudson Falls, NY, to the
Federal Dam at Troy, NY. To avoid
installing and burying HVDC cables
within this area, the proposed Project
route would exit the Canal north of Lock
C8 near Durham Basin, where an
existing CP railroad right-of-way is
located immediately adjacent to the
west of the Canal. Upon exiting the
canal, the four cables would be buried
for approximately 46.1 miles within the
CP railroad bypass route to the west of
the Hudson River, traversing the
municipalities of Moreau,
Northumberland, Wilton, Greenfield,
Saratoga Springs, Milton, Ballston,
Clifton Park, Glenville, and
Schenectady, NY. In the town of
Rotterdam, NY, the buried route would
transfer to the CSX Railroad (CSX) rightof-way and proceed south for
approximately 23.7 miles through the
municipalities of Guilderland, New
Scotland, Voorheesville, and
Bethlehem. The proposed Project route
would then exit the railroad right-ofway and enter the Hudson River at the
town of Coeymans, NY (about 14 miles
south of Albany). In general, when a
railroad right-of-way intersects with a
waterway, the applicant’s preference
would be to attach the cables to the
bridge structure, particularly for longer
crossings such as the bridge over the
Mohawk River in Schenectady, NY. If
the cables could not be attached to the
bridge due to engineering concerns or
owner preference, an option would be
for the applicant to employ horizontal
directional drilling to install high-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
density polyethylene (HDPE) casings for
the cables to use under the waterway.
Upon entering the Hudson River, the
four cables would be buried for 118
miles until they reach the City of
Yonkers, NY. Two of the four HVDC
cables (one bipole) would terminate at
the proposed converter station located
in Yonkers for a total length of
approximately 319 miles from the U.S.
border with Canada to Yonkers, NY. The
remaining two cables would continue
for approximately 66 miles under the
Hudson River, Spuyten Duyvil Creek,
the Harlem River, and the East River
into Long Island Sound before
terminating at a converter station near 1
W Avenue in Bridgeport, CT, for at total
length of approximately 384.4 miles
from the U.S. border with Canada to
Bridgeport. This route is discussed
below as being Route A, the applicant’s
preferred alternative.
The Champlain Hudson Presidential
permit application, including associated
maps and drawings, can be viewed or
downloaded in its entirety from the
DOE program Web site at https://
www.oe.energy.gov/
permits_pending.htm (see PP–362), or
on the project EIS Web site at https://
CHPExpressEIS.org. Also available at
these same locations is the March 5,
2010, Federal Register Notice of Receipt
of Application (75 FR 10229).
Agency Purpose and Need, Proposed
Action, and Alternatives
The DOE proposed Federal action is
the granting of a Presidential permit to
Champlain Hudson to construct,
operate, maintain, and connect a new
electric transmission line across the
U.S.-Canada border in northeastern New
York State. The EIS, Champlain Hudson
Power Express Transmission Line
Project Environmental Impact
Statement (DOE/EIS–0447), will address
potential environmental impacts from
the proposed action and the range of
reasonable alternatives. The purpose
and need for DOE’s action is to decide
whether to grant Champlain Hudson
said Presidential permit. It should be
noted, however, that although the
potential environmental impacts are
important, they are not the only criteria
that form the basis for the final
permitting decision. If granted, the
Presidential permit would authorize
only that portion of the line that would
be constructed, operated, and
maintained wholly within the United
States.
Three action alternatives (routes) for
constructing the proposed transmission
line inside the United States have been
identified by the applicant, and they
differ little in total length: 384.5 miles
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for Route A, 384.2 miles for Route B,
and 385.7 miles for Route C. The lines
differ, however, in the amount of the
line that is submerged or buried
underground. Route A, the Champlain
Hudson preferred alternative, has
approximately 72.4 miles buried
underground. Route B has
approximately 89.4 miles buried
underground, and Route C has about
68.0 miles buried underground. The
remaining distances of all routes are
submerged. Maps showing all three
alternative routes may be found at
https://CHPExpressEIS.org/maps.
All three routes cross the U.S.-Canada
border in Lake Champlain at Rouses
Point, NY (which is about five miles
east of the Town of Champlain, NY), 35
miles from where they would begin
southeast of Montreal, Canada. Route A,
the applicant’s preferred alternative, is
described in detail above.
The Route B alternative is the same as
Route A, except that after exiting the
water just north of Lock C12 of the
Champlain Canal (Canal) in the town of
Whitehall, NY, Route B would continue
within an existing railroad right-of-way
owned by Canadian Pacific Railway
(CP) for 19.5 miles through the
municipalities of Comstock, Fort Ann,
and Kingsbury. Route B would overlap
with Route A where Route A exits the
Champlain Canal north of Lock C8 near
Durham Basin.
Route C is the same as Route A except
for a 6.3 mile segment from north of
Lock C8 near Durham Basin, where
Route A exits the Champlain Canal
(Canal) to travel south about 4.8 miles
within the CP railroad right-of-way. At
the point where Route A would exit the
canal, Route C instead would continue
under the Canal for 2.9 miles toward
Lock C8 in Fort Edward, NY. North of
Lock C8, the cables would exit the Canal
and would be buried for 0.4 miles
within land owned by the New York
State Canal Corporation on the eastern
shore of Lock C8. The HVDC cables
would re-enter the Canal just south of
Lock C8 and continue under the Canal
for 2.1 miles towards Lock C7, also
located in Fort Edward, NY. North of
Lock C7, the cables would exit the
eastern side of the canal and be buried
for 0.2 miles within land owned by the
New York State Canal Corporation
before entering the Hudson River to the
south of Rogers Island, where the
Hudson River flows parallel to the
Champlain Canal. The four cables
would be buried under the Hudson
River, and Route C would travel in a
northern direction under the river to the
west of Rogers Island for 0.7 miles
before reaching the CP railroad bridge
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
that extends roughly southwest over the
Hudson River from Fort Edward, NY
toward Moreau, NY. The cables would
exit the water on the west side of the
Hudson River and Route C would
overlap with Route A at the same point
where Route A would transition from
being attached to the bridge structure to
being buried within the railroad rightof-way in the town of Moreau. This
alternative assumes that PCB dredging
activities associated with the Hudson
River Dredging Project planned for the
area around Rogers Island are completed
by 2013. (The northern tip of Rogers
Island is about one-quarter of a mile
west of Fort Edward. Overall, the Island
is just less than one mile in length.)
Champlain Hudson is also
considering two alternative substations
identified as feasible points of
interconnection in New York, regardless
of the alternative route: The Gowanus
345-kV substation, located in New York
County, and the Astoria (Polleti) 345-kV
substation, located in Queens County.
An alternative site under consideration
for the DC–AC converter station in
Queens County is land adjacent to the
Astoria substation. In Connecticut, 60
Main Street in Bridgeport has been
identified as a possible alternative site
for the converter station.
Under the No Action alternative, DOE
would deny Champlain Hudson’s
application for a Presidential permit for
the proposed international electric
transmission line.
Identification of Environmental Issues
The EIS will examine public health
and safety effects and environmental
impacts in the U.S. from the proposed
HVDC transmission facilities. This
notice is intended to inform agencies
and the public of the proposed project,
and to solicit comments and suggestions
for consideration in the preparation of
the EIS. To help the public frame its
comments, the following is a
preliminary list of several potential
environmental issues in the U.S. that
DOE and Champlain Hudson have
tentatively identified for analysis,
including:
1. Impacts on protected, threatened,
endangered, or sensitive species of
animals or plants, or their critical
habitats: The EIS will consider the
effects of the construction and operation
of the project on essential fish habitats
and species, including the shortnose
sturgeon (Federally listed endangered
species), leatherback sea turtle
(Federally listed endangered species),
loggerhead sea turtle (Federal listed
threatened species), green sea turtle
(Federal listed threatened species), and
Atlantic sturgeon (Federally listed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
candidate species as of October 17,
2006).
2. Impacts on aquatic biological
resources: The EIS will consider the
effects of the construction and operation
of the project on shellfish, benthic
communities, finfish, and commercial
and recreational fisheries, and the
potential for introduction of invasive
species.
3. Impacts on floodplains and
wetlands: The EIS will consider the
effects of the construction and operation
of the project on wetlands and on
freshwater, tidal, and estuarine
floodplains. The portions of all three
alternative routes that utilize the CP
railroad right-of-way would cross
Federal Emergency Management
Agency-mapped floodplains associated
with the Champlain Canal and the
Hudson River. The routes cross the
Mohawk River within the City of
Schenectady, but an option under
consideration is the possible suspension
of the cables from the railroad bridge,
such that they would not be buried
within the floodplain. The underground
connection to the Yonkers and
Bridgeport converter stations utilized by
all three route alternatives would cross
bordering floodplain at the landfall
locations. Portions of the Sherman
Creek East substation site and the
underground connection to the
substation are located in floodplain
associated with the Harlem River in
New York City. Limited wetland
delineations and available New York
State mapping resources indicate that
less than 15 acres of wetlands would be
temporarily impacted within the
construction corridor along the
underground portions of Routes A, B,
and C.
4. Impacts on cultural or historic
resources: The EIS will consider the
effects of the construction and operation
of the project on shipwrecks and
National Historic Landmarks; e.g., the
proposed transmission cable route
travels through the boundary of the
Crown Point and Fort Ticonderoga
National Historic Landmarks. The
project facilities would also be located
within National Heritage Areas and New
York State Heritage Areas, including the
Mohawk Valley Heritage Corridor and
the RiverSpark (Hudson-Mohawk)
Heritage Area.
5. Impacts on human health and
safety: The EIS will consider the nature
and effects of electric and magnetic
fields that may be generated by the
construction and operation of the
project.
6. Impacts on air quality: The EIS will
consider the effects of the construction
and operation of the project on air
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34723
quality, including the emission and
effects of greenhouse gases such as
carbon dioxide.
7. Impacts on soil: The EIS will
consider the effects of the construction
and operation of the project on the loss
or disturbance of soils.
8. Impacts on water quality: The EIS
will consider the effects of the
installation and operation of the
transmission cables on water quality
due to potential re-suspension of
sediments and contaminants, including
PCBs in the Hudson River.
9. Impacts to land use: The EIS will
consider the effects of the installation
and operation of the project on land
uses, including agricultural lands,
parks, and public lands.
10. Visual impacts: The EIS will
consider the effects of the installation
and operation of the project on visual
resources of any above-ground
components of the project, including
near the locations of the two converter
stations.
11. Noise impacts: The EIS will
consider the effects of the installation
and operation of the project on noise
levels near the locations of the two DCto-AC converter stations.
12. Socioeconomic impacts: This EIS
will consider impacts on community
services.
13. Environmental justice: The EIS
will include consideration of any
disproportionately high and adverse
impacts on minority and low-income
populations.
This list is not intended to be all
inclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. DOE
invites interested parties to suggest
specific issues within these general
categories, or other issues not included
above, to be considered in the EIS.
Scoping Process
Interested parties are invited to
participate in the scoping process, both
to help define the environmental issues
to be analyzed and to identify the range
of reasonable alternatives. Both oral and
written comments will be considered
and given equal weight by DOE,
regardless of how submitted. Public
scoping meetings will be held at the
locations, dates, and times as indicated
below:
1. Bridgeport, CT: Bridgeport City
Hall, 45 Lyon Terrace, Bridgeport, CT
06604; 7–9 p.m., Thursday, July 8, 2010.
2. New York City, NY: U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, Room 27A (27th floor,
conference room A), New York, NY
10007; 2–4 p.m., Friday, July 9, 2010. It
is important to note that this is a secure
building: all carried items, e.g.,
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
34724
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
handbags and backpacks, will be Xrayed and visitors will pass through a
metal detector.
3. Yonkers, NY: Royal Regency Hotel,
165 Tuckahoe Road, Yonkers, NY
10710; 7–9 p.m., Monday, July 12, 2010.
4. Kingston, NY: Holiday Inn Kingston
NY, 503 Washington Avenue, Kingston,
NY 12401; 7–9 p.m., Tuesday, July 13,
2010.
5. Albany, NY: The Holiday Inn
Albany at Wolf Road, 205 Wolf Road,
Albany, NY 12205; 7–9 p.m.,
Wednesday, July 14, 2010.
6. Glens Falls, NY: Ramada Glens
Falls/Lake George Area, 1 Abby Lane
(exit 19 off I–87), Queensbury, NY
12804; 7–9 p.m., Thursday, July 15,
2010.
7. Plattsburgh, NY: Plattsburgh North
Country Chamber of Commerce, 7061
State Route 9, Plattsburgh, NY 12901;
7–9 p.m., Friday, July 16, 2010.
The scoping meetings will be
structured in two parts: First, an
informal discussion ‘‘workshop’’ period
that will not be recorded; and, second,
the formal taking of comments with
transcription by a court stenographer.
The meetings will provide interested
parties the opportunity to view
proposed project exhibits, ask questions,
and make comments. Applicant, DOE,
and any cooperating agency
representatives will be available to
answer questions and provide
additional information to attendees to
the extent that additional information is
available at this early stage of the
proceedings.
Persons submitting comments during
the scoping process, whether orally or
in writing, will receive either paper or
electronic copies of the Draft EIS,
according to their preference. Persons
who do not wish to submit comments or
suggestions at this time but who would
like to receive a copy of the document
for review and comment when it is
issued should notify Dr. Jerry Pell as
provided above, with their paper-orelectronic preference.
EIS Preparation and Schedule
In preparing the Draft EIS, DOE will
consider comments received during the
scoping period. As noted above,
comments can be submitted by various
means, and will be given the same
consideration. They can be submitted to
Dr. Jerry Pell either electronically or by
paper copy; if the latter, consider using
a delivery service because materials
submitted by regular mail are subject to
security screening, which both causes
extended delay and potential damage to
the contents. (Warped and unusable CD
or DVD discs are common.)
Additionally, comments can be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:17 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
submitted through the project Web site
established for preparation of the EIS, at
https://CHPExpressEIS.org. This site will
also serve as a repository for all public
documents and the central location for
announcements. Individuals may
subscribe to the ‘‘mail list’’ feature on the
project Web site in order to receive
future announcements and news
releases.
DOE will summarize all comments
received in a ‘‘Scoping Report’’ that will
be available on the project Web site and
distributed either electronically to all
parties of record for whom we have an
e-mail address, or by mailing paper
copies upon request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14,
2010.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office
of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2010–14760 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
International Energy Agency Meetings
Department of Energy.
Notice of Meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Industry Advisory Board
(IAB) to the International Energy
Agency (IEA) will meet on June 29,
2010, at the headquarters of the IEA in
Paris, France, in connection with a joint
meeting of the IEA’s Standing Group on
Emergency Questions (SEQ) and the
IEA’s Standing Group on the Oil Market
(SOM) on June 29; and on June 30 in
connection with a joint SEQ/SOM
Workshop on the Release of Industry
Stocks on June 30 and a meeting of the
SEQ on June 30 and continuing on July
1.
DATES: June 29–July 1, 2010.
´ ´
ADDRESSES: 9, rue de la Federation,
Paris, France.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diana D. Clark, Assistant General for
International and National Security
Programs, Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585, 202–586–3417.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with section 252(c)(1)(A)(i)
of the Energy Policy and Conservation
Act (42 U.S.C. 6272(c)(1)(A)(i)) (EPCA),
the following notice of meeting is
provided:
Meetings of the Industry Advisory
Board (IAB) to the International Energy
Agency (IEA) will be held at the
headquarters of the IEA, 9, rue de la
´ ´
Federation, Paris, France, on June 29,
2010, beginning at 9:30 a.m. and
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
continuing on June 30 at 8:30 a.m.; and
on June 30, commencing at 2:30 p.m.
and continuing on July 1, 2010, at 9:30
a.m. The purpose of this notice is to
permit attendance by representatives of
U.S. company members of the IAB at a
joint meeting of the IEA’s Standing
Group on Emergency Questions (SEQ)
and the IEA’s Standing Group on the Oil
Market (SOM) on June 29, which is
scheduled to be held at the headquarters
of the IEA commencing at 9:30 a.m., and
a joint SEQ/SOM Workshop on the
Release of Industry Stocks, which is
scheduled to be held at the same
location beginning at 9 a.m. on June 30.
The IAB will also hold a preparatory
meeting among company
representatives at the same location at
8:30 a.m. on June 30. The agenda for
this preparatory meeting is to discuss
the SEQ/SOM meeting and to review the
agendas of the SEQ/SOM workshop and
the 130th SEQ meeting, to be held on
June 30–July 1.
The agenda of the joint SEQ/SOM
meeting on June 29 is under the control
of the SEQ and the SOM. It is expected
that the SEQ and the SOM will adopt
the following agenda:
1. Adoption of the Agenda.
2. Approval of the Summary Record of
the March 2010 Joint Meeting.
3. The 2011–2012 Program of Work for
the SOM and SEQ.
—Priority Setting Exercise.
—Governing Board Brainstorming.
4. The Medium-Term Oil Market Report.
5. Report on the International Energy
Forum.
6. Update on the Medium-Term Gas
Market Report.
7. Other Business.
The agenda of the SEQ/SOM
workshop on June 30 is under the
control of the SEQ and the SOM. It is
expected that the SEQ and the SOM will
adopt the following agenda:
1. Introduction by the IEA Secretariat.
2. Introduction by the Chairman.
3. Session 1—Industry Stockholding
Obligation.
—How do we assure the availability
of such stocks in a crisis? How are
industry emergency stocks related
to minimum operating
requirements?
4. Session 2—The Government
Measures to Make Industry
Obligatory Stockholding Available
to the Market.
—What other measures are available
besides lowering the obligation for
industry to hold stocks? Does the
lowering of the obligation need to
be more focused than just a uniform
reduction across all companies, for
all fuels? What is the minimum
E:\FR\FM\18JNN1.SGM
18JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34720-34724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14760]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[OE Docket No. PP-362]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and
To Conduct Public Scoping Meetings, and Notice of Floodplains and
Wetlands Involvement; Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc.
AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) and to conduct Public Scoping Meetings; Notice of Floodplains and
Wetlands Involvement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces its intention to
prepare an EIS pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508),
and the DOE NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR part 1021) to assess
the potential environmental impacts from its proposed Federal action of
granting a Presidential permit to Champlain Hudson Power Express, Inc.
(Champlain Hudson) to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a new
electric transmission line across the U.S.-Canada border in
northeastern New York State. The EIS, Champlain Hudson Power Express
Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-
0447), will address potential environmental impacts from the proposed
action and the range of reasonable alternatives.
The purpose of this Notice of Intent (NOI) is to inform the public
about the proposed action, announce plans to conduct seven public
scoping meetings in the vicinity of the proposed transmission line,
invite public participation in the scoping process, and solicit public
comments for consideration in establishing the scope of the EIS.
Because the proposed project may involve actions in floodplains and
wetlands, in accordance with 10 CFR part 1022, Compliance with
Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements, the draft EIS
will include a floodplain and wetland assessment as appropriate, and
the final EIS or record of decision will include a floodplain statement
of findings.
[[Page 34721]]
DATES: DOE invites interested agencies, organizations, Native American
tribes, and members of the public to submit comments to assist in
identifying significant environmental issues and in determining the
appropriate scope of the EIS. The public scoping period starts with the
publication of this Notice in the Federal Register and will continue
until August 2, 2010. Written and oral comments will be given equal
weight, and DOE will consider all comments received or postmarked by
August 2, 2010 in defining the scope of this EIS. Comments received or
postmarked after that date will be considered to the extent
practicable.
Locations, dates, and start and end times for the public scoping
meetings are listed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
NOI.
Requests to speak at any one or more public scoping meeting(s)
should be received by Dr. Jerry Pell at the address indicated below on
or before July 6, 2010; requests received by that date will be given
priority in the speaking order. However, requests to speak also may be
made at the scoping meetings.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the scope of the EIS and requests to be added to
the document mailing list should be addressed to: Dr. Jerry Pell,
Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE-20), U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC
20585; by electronic mail to Jerry.Pell@hq.doe.gov; or by facsimile to
202-318-7761. For general information on the DOE NEPA process contact:
Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance
(GC-54), U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20585; by electronic mail at askNEPA@hq.doe.gov; or by
facsimile at 202-586-7031.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Jerry Pell at the addresses above,
or at 202-586-3362. For general information on the DOE NEPA process,
contact Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom at 202-586-4600, leave a message at 800-
472-2756, or at the addresses above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Executive Order (E.O.) 10485, as amended by
E.O. 12038, requires that a Presidential permit be issued by DOE before
electric transmission facilities may be constructed, operated,
maintained, or connected at the U.S. international border. The E.O.
provides that a Presidential permit may be issued after a finding that
the proposed project is consistent with the public interest and after
favorable recommendations from the U.S. Departments of State and
Defense. In determining consistency with the public interest, DOE
considers the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project
under NEPA, determines the project's impact on electric reliability
(including whether the proposed project would adversely affect the
operation of the U.S. electric power supply system under normal and
contingency conditions), and considers any other factors that DOE may
find relevant to the public interest. The regulations implementing the
E.O. have been codified at 10 CFR parts 205.320-205.329. DOE's issuance
of a Presidential permit indicates that there is no Federal objection
to the project, but does not mandate that the project be undertaken.
Champlain Hudson applied on January 27, 2010, to DOE's Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability (OE) for a Presidential
permit to construct, operate, maintain, and connect a 2,000-megawatt
(MW) high-voltage direct current (HVDC) Voltage Source Converter (VSC)
controllable transmission system from the Canadian Province of Quebec
to the New York City and Southwestern Connecticut regions. After due
consideration of the nature and extent of the proposed project,
including evaluation of the ``Information Regarding Potential
Environmental Impacts'' section of the Presidential permit application,
DOE has determined that the appropriate level of NEPA review for this
project is an EIS.
The proposed Federal action is the granting of the Presidential
permit and it is anticipated that the project could significantly
affect the quality of the human environment. Because the proposed
project may involve actions in floodplains and wetlands, in accordance
with 10 CFR part 1022, Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland
Environmental Review Requirements, the draft EIS will include a
floodplain and wetland assessment as appropriate, and the final EIS or
record of decision will include a floodplain statement of findings.
DOE invites Tribal governments and Federal, state, and local
agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to be cooperating agencies with respect to the
EIS, as defined at 40 CFR 1501.6. Cooperating agencies have certain
responsibilities to support the NEPA process, as specified at 40 CFR
1501.6(b). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (anticipated), the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region 2, and the New York State
Departments of Environmental Conservation and Public Service are
cooperating agencies with respect to this EIS.
In addition, Champlain Hudson applied to DOE on September 12, 2009,
for a Federal loan guarantee for the proposed project in response to a
DOE competitive solicitation, ``Federal Loan Guarantees for Electric
Power Transmission Infrastructure Investment Projects,'' issued under
section 1705, Title XVII, of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct).
Section 406 of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the
``Recovery Act'') amended EPAct by adding section 1705. This section is
designed to address the current economic conditions of the Nation, in
part by facilitating the development of eligible renewable and
transmission projects that commence construction no later than
September 30, 2011. DOE is carrying out an evaluation of the
application submitted by Champlain Hudson. Should DOE decide to enter
into the negotiation of a possible loan guarantee with Champlain
Hudson, DOE would use this EIS to meet its NEPA requirements in making
a determination of funding.
Applicant's Proposal
The applicant's proposed VSC controllable transmission system
consists of two 1,000-MW HVDC bipoles. A bipole consists of two
connected submarine or underground cables, one of which is positively
charged, and the other negatively charged. In total, four cables would
be laid between Quebec, Canada, and a proposed converter station in
Yonkers, NY, where one bipole (two cables) would be terminated. The
converter station would change the electrical power from direct current
to alternating current. The remaining bipole (two cables) would
continue to a proposed converter station in Bridgeport, CT. Champlain
Hudson's proposed transmission line would connect renewable sources of
power generation in Canada with load centers in and around the New York
City and southwestern Connecticut regions.
The project would originate at an HVDC converter station near
Hydro-Qu[eacute]bec Trans[Eacute]nergie's 765/315-kilovolt (kV) Hertel
substation, located southeast of Montreal, and extend approximately 35
miles to the international border between the United States and Canada,
crossing in Lake Champlain to the east of the Town of Champlain, NY.
Four cables (two bipoles) would extend south under Lake Champlain for
approximately 111 miles entirely within the jurisdictional waters of
New York State. At the southern end of Lake Champlain, the cables would
exit the
[[Page 34722]]
water just north of Lock C12 of the Champlain Canal (Canal) in the town
of Whitehall, NY, and would be buried within an existing railroad
right-of-way owned by Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) for 1.7 miles. The
cables would enter the Canal just south of Lock C12 and continue under
the Canal for 5.6 miles to Comstock, NY, and then utilize another CP
railroad right-of-way for 0.4 miles to circumvent Lock C11. The cables
would re-enter the canal just south of Lock C11 and continue under the
Canal for 8.9 miles toward Lock C9 in Kingsbury, NY (there is no Lock
C10). North of Lock C9, the cables would exit the Canal and would be
buried for 0.5 miles within land owned by the New York State Canal
Corporation on the eastern shore of Lock C9. The HVDC cables would re-
enter the Canal just south of Lock C9 and continue under the Canal for
2.7 miles toward Lock C8 in Fort Edward, NY.
The Upper Hudson River portion of the Hudson River polychlorinated
biphenyl (PCB) site (USEPA Identification Number NYD980763841)
stretches from Hudson Falls, NY, to the Federal Dam at Troy, NY. To
avoid installing and burying HVDC cables within this area, the proposed
Project route would exit the Canal north of Lock C8 near Durham Basin,
where an existing CP railroad right-of-way is located immediately
adjacent to the west of the Canal. Upon exiting the canal, the four
cables would be buried for approximately 46.1 miles within the CP
railroad bypass route to the west of the Hudson River, traversing the
municipalities of Moreau, Northumberland, Wilton, Greenfield, Saratoga
Springs, Milton, Ballston, Clifton Park, Glenville, and Schenectady,
NY. In the town of Rotterdam, NY, the buried route would transfer to
the CSX Railroad (CSX) right-of-way and proceed south for approximately
23.7 miles through the municipalities of Guilderland, New Scotland,
Voorheesville, and Bethlehem. The proposed Project route would then
exit the railroad right-of-way and enter the Hudson River at the town
of Coeymans, NY (about 14 miles south of Albany). In general, when a
railroad right-of-way intersects with a waterway, the applicant's
preference would be to attach the cables to the bridge structure,
particularly for longer crossings such as the bridge over the Mohawk
River in Schenectady, NY. If the cables could not be attached to the
bridge due to engineering concerns or owner preference, an option would
be for the applicant to employ horizontal directional drilling to
install high-density polyethylene (HDPE) casings for the cables to use
under the waterway.
Upon entering the Hudson River, the four cables would be buried for
118 miles until they reach the City of Yonkers, NY. Two of the four
HVDC cables (one bipole) would terminate at the proposed converter
station located in Yonkers for a total length of approximately 319
miles from the U.S. border with Canada to Yonkers, NY. The remaining
two cables would continue for approximately 66 miles under the Hudson
River, Spuyten Duyvil Creek, the Harlem River, and the East River into
Long Island Sound before terminating at a converter station near 1 W
Avenue in Bridgeport, CT, for at total length of approximately 384.4
miles from the U.S. border with Canada to Bridgeport. This route is
discussed below as being Route A, the applicant's preferred
alternative.
The Champlain Hudson Presidential permit application, including
associated maps and drawings, can be viewed or downloaded in its
entirety from the DOE program Web site at https://www.oe.energy.gov/permits_pending.htm (see PP-362), or on the project EIS Web site at
https://CHPExpressEIS.org. Also available at these same locations is the
March 5, 2010, Federal Register Notice of Receipt of Application (75 FR
10229).
Agency Purpose and Need, Proposed Action, and Alternatives
The DOE proposed Federal action is the granting of a Presidential
permit to Champlain Hudson to construct, operate, maintain, and connect
a new electric transmission line across the U.S.-Canada border in
northeastern New York State. The EIS, Champlain Hudson Power Express
Transmission Line Project Environmental Impact Statement (DOE/EIS-
0447), will address potential environmental impacts from the proposed
action and the range of reasonable alternatives. The purpose and need
for DOE's action is to decide whether to grant Champlain Hudson said
Presidential permit. It should be noted, however, that although the
potential environmental impacts are important, they are not the only
criteria that form the basis for the final permitting decision. If
granted, the Presidential permit would authorize only that portion of
the line that would be constructed, operated, and maintained wholly
within the United States.
Three action alternatives (routes) for constructing the proposed
transmission line inside the United States have been identified by the
applicant, and they differ little in total length: 384.5 miles for
Route A, 384.2 miles for Route B, and 385.7 miles for Route C. The
lines differ, however, in the amount of the line that is submerged or
buried underground. Route A, the Champlain Hudson preferred
alternative, has approximately 72.4 miles buried underground. Route B
has approximately 89.4 miles buried underground, and Route C has about
68.0 miles buried underground. The remaining distances of all routes
are submerged. Maps showing all three alternative routes may be found
at https://CHPExpressEIS.org/maps.
All three routes cross the U.S.-Canada border in Lake Champlain at
Rouses Point, NY (which is about five miles east of the Town of
Champlain, NY), 35 miles from where they would begin southeast of
Montreal, Canada. Route A, the applicant's preferred alternative, is
described in detail above.
The Route B alternative is the same as Route A, except that after
exiting the water just north of Lock C12 of the Champlain Canal (Canal)
in the town of Whitehall, NY, Route B would continue within an existing
railroad right-of-way owned by Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) for 19.5
miles through the municipalities of Comstock, Fort Ann, and Kingsbury.
Route B would overlap with Route A where Route A exits the Champlain
Canal north of Lock C8 near Durham Basin.
Route C is the same as Route A except for a 6.3 mile segment from
north of Lock C8 near Durham Basin, where Route A exits the Champlain
Canal (Canal) to travel south about 4.8 miles within the CP railroad
right-of-way. At the point where Route A would exit the canal, Route C
instead would continue under the Canal for 2.9 miles toward Lock C8 in
Fort Edward, NY. North of Lock C8, the cables would exit the Canal and
would be buried for 0.4 miles within land owned by the New York State
Canal Corporation on the eastern shore of Lock C8. The HVDC cables
would re-enter the Canal just south of Lock C8 and continue under the
Canal for 2.1 miles towards Lock C7, also located in Fort Edward, NY.
North of Lock C7, the cables would exit the eastern side of the canal
and be buried for 0.2 miles within land owned by the New York State
Canal Corporation before entering the Hudson River to the south of
Rogers Island, where the Hudson River flows parallel to the Champlain
Canal. The four cables would be buried under the Hudson River, and
Route C would travel in a northern direction under the river to the
west of Rogers Island for 0.7 miles before reaching the CP railroad
bridge
[[Page 34723]]
that extends roughly southwest over the Hudson River from Fort Edward,
NY toward Moreau, NY. The cables would exit the water on the west side
of the Hudson River and Route C would overlap with Route A at the same
point where Route A would transition from being attached to the bridge
structure to being buried within the railroad right-of-way in the town
of Moreau. This alternative assumes that PCB dredging activities
associated with the Hudson River Dredging Project planned for the area
around Rogers Island are completed by 2013. (The northern tip of Rogers
Island is about one-quarter of a mile west of Fort Edward. Overall, the
Island is just less than one mile in length.)
Champlain Hudson is also considering two alternative substations
identified as feasible points of interconnection in New York,
regardless of the alternative route: The Gowanus 345-kV substation,
located in New York County, and the Astoria (Polleti) 345-kV
substation, located in Queens County. An alternative site under
consideration for the DC-AC converter station in Queens County is land
adjacent to the Astoria substation. In Connecticut, 60 Main Street in
Bridgeport has been identified as a possible alternative site for the
converter station.
Under the No Action alternative, DOE would deny Champlain Hudson's
application for a Presidential permit for the proposed international
electric transmission line.
Identification of Environmental Issues
The EIS will examine public health and safety effects and
environmental impacts in the U.S. from the proposed HVDC transmission
facilities. This notice is intended to inform agencies and the public
of the proposed project, and to solicit comments and suggestions for
consideration in the preparation of the EIS. To help the public frame
its comments, the following is a preliminary list of several potential
environmental issues in the U.S. that DOE and Champlain Hudson have
tentatively identified for analysis, including:
1. Impacts on protected, threatened, endangered, or sensitive
species of animals or plants, or their critical habitats: The EIS will
consider the effects of the construction and operation of the project
on essential fish habitats and species, including the shortnose
sturgeon (Federally listed endangered species), leatherback sea turtle
(Federally listed endangered species), loggerhead sea turtle (Federal
listed threatened species), green sea turtle (Federal listed threatened
species), and Atlantic sturgeon (Federally listed candidate species as
of October 17, 2006).
2. Impacts on aquatic biological resources: The EIS will consider
the effects of the construction and operation of the project on
shellfish, benthic communities, finfish, and commercial and
recreational fisheries, and the potential for introduction of invasive
species.
3. Impacts on floodplains and wetlands: The EIS will consider the
effects of the construction and operation of the project on wetlands
and on freshwater, tidal, and estuarine floodplains. The portions of
all three alternative routes that utilize the CP railroad right-of-way
would cross Federal Emergency Management Agency-mapped floodplains
associated with the Champlain Canal and the Hudson River. The routes
cross the Mohawk River within the City of Schenectady, but an option
under consideration is the possible suspension of the cables from the
railroad bridge, such that they would not be buried within the
floodplain. The underground connection to the Yonkers and Bridgeport
converter stations utilized by all three route alternatives would cross
bordering floodplain at the landfall locations. Portions of the Sherman
Creek East substation site and the underground connection to the
substation are located in floodplain associated with the Harlem River
in New York City. Limited wetland delineations and available New York
State mapping resources indicate that less than 15 acres of wetlands
would be temporarily impacted within the construction corridor along
the underground portions of Routes A, B, and C.
4. Impacts on cultural or historic resources: The EIS will consider
the effects of the construction and operation of the project on
shipwrecks and National Historic Landmarks; e.g., the proposed
transmission cable route travels through the boundary of the Crown
Point and Fort Ticonderoga National Historic Landmarks. The project
facilities would also be located within National Heritage Areas and New
York State Heritage Areas, including the Mohawk Valley Heritage
Corridor and the RiverSpark (Hudson-Mohawk) Heritage Area.
5. Impacts on human health and safety: The EIS will consider the
nature and effects of electric and magnetic fields that may be
generated by the construction and operation of the project.
6. Impacts on air quality: The EIS will consider the effects of the
construction and operation of the project on air quality, including the
emission and effects of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
7. Impacts on soil: The EIS will consider the effects of the
construction and operation of the project on the loss or disturbance of
soils.
8. Impacts on water quality: The EIS will consider the effects of
the installation and operation of the transmission cables on water
quality due to potential re-suspension of sediments and contaminants,
including PCBs in the Hudson River.
9. Impacts to land use: The EIS will consider the effects of the
installation and operation of the project on land uses, including
agricultural lands, parks, and public lands.
10. Visual impacts: The EIS will consider the effects of the
installation and operation of the project on visual resources of any
above-ground components of the project, including near the locations of
the two converter stations.
11. Noise impacts: The EIS will consider the effects of the
installation and operation of the project on noise levels near the
locations of the two DC-to-AC converter stations.
12. Socioeconomic impacts: This EIS will consider impacts on
community services.
13. Environmental justice: The EIS will include consideration of
any disproportionately high and adverse impacts on minority and low-
income populations.
This list is not intended to be all inclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. DOE invites interested parties to suggest
specific issues within these general categories, or other issues not
included above, to be considered in the EIS.
Scoping Process
Interested parties are invited to participate in the scoping
process, both to help define the environmental issues to be analyzed
and to identify the range of reasonable alternatives. Both oral and
written comments will be considered and given equal weight by DOE,
regardless of how submitted. Public scoping meetings will be held at
the locations, dates, and times as indicated below:
1. Bridgeport, CT: Bridgeport City Hall, 45 Lyon Terrace,
Bridgeport, CT 06604; 7-9 p.m., Thursday, July 8, 2010.
2. New York City, NY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 290
Broadway, Room 27A (27th floor, conference room A), New York, NY 10007;
2-4 p.m., Friday, July 9, 2010. It is important to note that this is a
secure building: all carried items, e.g.,
[[Page 34724]]
handbags and backpacks, will be X-rayed and visitors will pass through
a metal detector.
3. Yonkers, NY: Royal Regency Hotel, 165 Tuckahoe Road, Yonkers, NY
10710; 7-9 p.m., Monday, July 12, 2010.
4. Kingston, NY: Holiday Inn Kingston NY, 503 Washington Avenue,
Kingston, NY 12401; 7-9 p.m., Tuesday, July 13, 2010.
5. Albany, NY: The Holiday Inn Albany at Wolf Road, 205 Wolf Road,
Albany, NY 12205; 7-9 p.m., Wednesday, July 14, 2010.
6. Glens Falls, NY: Ramada Glens Falls/Lake George Area, 1 Abby
Lane (exit 19 off I-87), Queensbury, NY 12804; 7-9 p.m., Thursday, July
15, 2010.
7. Plattsburgh, NY: Plattsburgh North Country Chamber of Commerce,
7061 State Route 9, Plattsburgh, NY 12901; 7-9 p.m., Friday, July 16,
2010.
The scoping meetings will be structured in two parts: First, an
informal discussion ``workshop'' period that will not be recorded; and,
second, the formal taking of comments with transcription by a court
stenographer. The meetings will provide interested parties the
opportunity to view proposed project exhibits, ask questions, and make
comments. Applicant, DOE, and any cooperating agency representatives
will be available to answer questions and provide additional
information to attendees to the extent that additional information is
available at this early stage of the proceedings.
Persons submitting comments during the scoping process, whether
orally or in writing, will receive either paper or electronic copies of
the Draft EIS, according to their preference. Persons who do not wish
to submit comments or suggestions at this time but who would like to
receive a copy of the document for review and comment when it is issued
should notify Dr. Jerry Pell as provided above, with their paper-or-
electronic preference.
EIS Preparation and Schedule
In preparing the Draft EIS, DOE will consider comments received
during the scoping period. As noted above, comments can be submitted by
various means, and will be given the same consideration. They can be
submitted to Dr. Jerry Pell either electronically or by paper copy; if
the latter, consider using a delivery service because materials
submitted by regular mail are subject to security screening, which both
causes extended delay and potential damage to the contents. (Warped and
unusable CD or DVD discs are common.) Additionally, comments can be
submitted through the project Web site established for preparation of
the EIS, at https://CHPExpressEIS.org. This site will also serve as a
repository for all public documents and the central location for
announcements. Individuals may subscribe to the ``mail list'' feature
on the project Web site in order to receive future announcements and
news releases.
DOE will summarize all comments received in a ``Scoping Report''
that will be available on the project Web site and distributed either
electronically to all parties of record for whom we have an e-mail
address, or by mailing paper copies upon request.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 14, 2010.
Patricia A. Hoffman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2010-14760 Filed 6-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P