Washington: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 34674-34682 [2010-13851]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
34674
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
comment on an amendment, paragraph,
or section of this rule and if that
provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
For additional information, see the
direct final rule which is located in the
Rules Section of this Federal Register.
Dated: June 8, 2010.
Ira W. Leighton,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2010–14509 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R10–RCRA 2010–0251; FRL–9160–7]
Washington: Proposed Authorization
of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
SUMMARY: Washington has applied to
EPA for final authorization of certain
changes to its hazardous waste
management program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, as amended, (RCRA). EPA has
reviewed Washington’s application and
has preliminarily determined that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed
to qualify for final authorization and is
proposing to authorize Washington’s
changes.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received by July 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R10–RCRA–2010–0251 by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Kocourek.Nina@epa.gov.
• Mail: Nina Kocourek, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste & Toxics
(AWT–122), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite
900, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID Number EPA–R10–RCRA–
2010–0251. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy.
You may view and copy the Washington
application, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of
Air, Waste & Toxics, Mailstop AWT–
122, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900,
Seattle, Washington 98101, contact:
Nina Kocourek, phone number: (206)
553–6502 or at the Washington State
Department of Ecology, 300 Desmond
Drive, Lacey, Washington 98503,
contact: Robert Rieck, phone number
(360) 407–6751.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nina Kocourek, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of
Air, Waste & Toxics (AWT–122), 1200
Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle,
Washington 98101, phone number:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(206) 553–6502, e-mail:
kocourek.nina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States which have received final
authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste
management program that is equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the
Federal program changes, States must
change their programs and ask EPA to
authorize the changes. Changes to State
programs may be necessary when
Federal or State statutory or regulatory
authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly,
States must change their programs
because of changes to EPA’s regulations
in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260
through 266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this
rule?
We have preliminarily determined
that Washington’s application to revise
its authorized program meets all of the
statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we
propose to grant Washington final
authorization to operate its hazardous
waste management program with the
changes as described in its revised
program application. Washington will
have responsibility for permitting
treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) within its borders,
except in Indian country (18 U.S.C.
1151), and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its
revised program application, subject to
the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984
(HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA, which are more
stringent than existing requirements,
take effect in authorized States before
the State is authorized for these
requirements. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Washington, including
issuing permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
C. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
If Washington is authorized for these
changes, a facility in Washington
subject to RCRA will have to comply
with the authorized State requirements
instead of the corresponding Federal
requirements in order to comply with
RCRA. Additionally, such persons will
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
have to comply with any applicable
Federal requirements, such as HSWA
regulations issued by EPA for which the
State has not received authorization and
RCRA requirements that are not
supplanted by authorized State-issued
requirements. Washington has
enforcement responsibilities under its
State hazardous waste program for
violations of its program, but EPA
retains its independent enforcement
authority under RCRA sections 3007,
3008, 3013, and 7003, which include,
among others, authority to:
• Conduct inspections; require
monitoring, tests, analyses, or reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements;
suspend, terminate, modify or revoke
permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions.
The proposed action to approve these
revisions would not impose additional
requirements on the regulated
community because the regulations for
which Washington will be authorized
are already effective under State law
and are not changed by the act of
authorization.
D. What happens if EPA receives
comments on this action?
If EPA receives comments on this
proposed action, we will address those
comments in a later final rule. You may
not have another opportunity to
comment. If you want to comment on
this authorization, you must do so at
this time.
E. What has Washington previously
been authorized for?
Washington initially received final
authorization on January 30, 1986,
effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3782),
to implement the State’s dangerous
waste management program. EPA
granted authorization for changes to
Washington’s program on September 22,
1987, effective on November 23, 1987
(52 FR 35556); August 17, 1990,
effective October 16, 1990 (55 FR
33695); November 4, 1994, effective
November 4, 1994 (59 FR 55322);
February 29, 1996, effective April 29,
1996 (61 FR 7736); September 22, 1998,
effective October 22, 1998 (63 FR
50531); October 12, 1999, effective
January 11, 2000 (64 FR 55142); April
11, 2002, effective April 11, 2002 (67 FR
17636); April 14, 2006, effective June
34675
13, 2006 (71 FR 19442) and on October
30, 2006 effective December 29, 2006
(71 FR 63253).
F. What changes are we proposing?
On May 18, 2010, Washington
submitted a hazardous waste
management program revision
application seeking authorization of its
changes in accordance with 40 CFR
271.21. On May 28, 2010 we determined
that Washington’s program revision
application was complete. We have
preliminarily determined that
Washington’s hazardous waste
management program revision satisfies
all requirements necessary to qualify for
final authorization. Therefore, we
propose to grant Washington final
authorization for the following program
changes as identified in Table 1 and
Table 2 below. Note: The RCRA
regulations the State is seeking
authorization for and are incorporated
by reference are those as published in
40 CFR parts 260 through 265, 268, 270,
and 279, as of July 1, 2007, unless
otherwise noted; and all of the
referenced analogous State authorities
were legally adopted and effective State
rules as of July 31, 2009.
TABLE 1—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM
Regulatory
checklist 1
Federal requirements
Federal Register
17S ........................
HSWA Codification Rule—
Exposure Information.
Toxicity Characteristic
Amendment.
Recycled used Oil Management Standards;
Clarification.
NESHAP: Surface Coating
of Automobiles and
Light-Duty Trucks.
Uniform Hazardous Waste
Manifest Rule and
Amendment.
50 FR 28702, 7/15/85 .......
800(8); 800(12).
57 FR 23062, 6/1/92 .........
070(3) except 070(3)(a)(iii) and 070(3)(c).
68 FR 44659, 7/30/03 .......
070(8)(c); 515(3) Incorporated by Reference (IBR) 045(1); 515(11) IBR 045(1).
69 FR 22601, 4/26/04 .......
691(1)(g); 400(3)(a).
70 FR 10766, 3/4/05 as
amended on 6/16/05 at
70 FR 35034.
040 ‘‘designated facility’’ definition; 040 ‘‘manifest’’ definition; 040 ‘‘manifest tracking
number’’ definition; 160(2)(a), 160(2)(a)(ii), 160(2)(a)(iii); 180, 180(1), 180(7),
180(7)(a) IBR 045(1), 180(7)(b), 180(7)(b)(i), 180(7)(b)(ii), 180(7)(b)(iii),
180(7)(b)(iv), 180(7)(c), 180(8), 180(8)(a), 180(8)(b); 190(3), 190(3)(b), 190(4);
200, 200(6), 200(6)(a), 200(6)(b); 230 IBR 045(1), 230(2), 230(2)(c), 230(2)(d),
230(2)(e); 180(1) IBR 045(1); 250, 250(1)(a), 250(1)(b), 250(9), 250(9)(a),
250(9)(b), 250(9)(c), 250(9)(d), 250(5), 250(6), 250(6)(a), 250(6)(b), 250(6)(b)(i),
250(6)(b)(ii); 370, 370(1); 370(2), 370(2)(a), 370(2)(b), 370(2)(c), 370(2)(d),
370(2)(e), 370(3), 370(4)(d), 370(8), 370(5), 370(5)(a), 370(5)(a)(i), 370(5)(a)(ii),
370(5)(a)(iii), 370(5)(b), 370(5)(c), 370(5)(d)(i), 370(5)(d)(ii), 370(5)(e), 370(5)(e)(i),
370(5)(e)(ii), 370(5)(e)(iii), 370(5)(e)(iv), 370(5)(e)(v), 370(5)(e)(vi), 370(5)(e)(vii),
370(5)(f), 370(5)(f)(i), 370(5)(f)(ii), 370(5)(f)(iii), 370(5)(f)(iv), 370(5)(f)(v),
370(5)(f)(vi), 370(5)(f)(vii), 370(5)(g); 390(1), 390(1)(a), 390(1)(b), 390(1)(c),
390(1)(d), 390(1)(e), 390(1)(f), 390(1)(g).
040 ‘‘mercury-containing equipment’’ definition; 040 ‘‘universal waste’’ definition;
077(2); 600(3)(o)(ii); 400(2)(c)(xi)(B); 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1); 800(7)(c)(iii)(B);
573(1)(a)(ii), 573(3)(a), 573(3)(b), 573(3)(b)(i), 573(3)(b)(ii), 573(3)(b)(iii),
573(3)(c)(i), 573(3)(c)(ii); 040 ‘‘ampule’’ definition; 040 ‘‘large quantity handler of
universal waste’’ definition; 040 ‘‘mercury containing equipment’’ definition; 040
‘‘small quantity handler of universal waste’’ definition; 040 ‘‘universal waste’’ definition; 573(9)(b), 573(9)(b)(i), 573(9)(b)(ii), 573(9)(b)(ii)(A), 573(9)(b)(ii)(B),
573(9)(b)(ii)(C), 573(9)(b)(ii)(D), 573(9)(b)(ii)(E), 573(9)(b)(ii)(F), 573(9)(b)(ii)(G),
573(9)(b)(ii)(H), 573(9)(b)(iii), 573(9)(b)(iii)(A), 573(9)(b)(iii)(B), 573(9)(b)(iv)(A),
573(9)(b)(iv)(A)(I),
573(9)(b)(iv)(A)(II),
573(9)(b)(iv)(B),
573(9)(b)(iv)(C),
573(10)(b)(i), 573(10)(b)(ii), 573(19)(b)(iv), 573(19)(b)(v), 573(20)(b), 573(20(b)(i),
573(20)(b)(ii), 573(20)(b)(ii)(A), 573(20)(b)(ii)(B), 573(20)(b)(ii)(C), 573(20)(b)(ii)(D),
573(20)(b)(ii)(E),
573(20)(b)(ii)(F),
573(20)(b)(ii)(G),
573(20)(b)(ii)(H),
573(20)(b)(iii),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A),
573(20)(b)(iii)(B),
573(20)(b)(iv)(A),
573(20)(b)(iv)(A)(I), 573(20)(b)(iv)(A)(II), 573(20)(b)(iv)(B), 573(20)(b)(iv)(C),
573(21)(b)(i), 573(21)(b)(ii).
117B 2 ....................
203 2
......................
205 ........................
207 2 and 207.1 2 ...
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
209 2 ......................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Universal Waste Rule:
Specific Provisions for
Mercury Containing
Equipment.
17:15 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
70 FR 45508, 8/5/05 .........
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Analogous state authority—Washington’s administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
34676
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM—Continued
Federal requirements
Federal Register
Analogous state authority—Washington’s administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
212 ........................
NESHAP: Final Standards
for Hazardous Waste
Combustors (Phase I
Final Replacement
Standards and Phase II).
70 FR 59402, 10/12/05 .....
213 2 ......................
Burden Reduction Initiative
71 FR 16862, 4/4/06 .........
214 2 ......................
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Regulatory
hecklist 1
Corrections to Errors in the
Code of Federal Regulations.
71 FR 40254, 7/14/06 .......
215 2 ......................
Cathode Ray Tubes Rule
71 FR 42928, 7/28/06 .......
110(1), 110(3)(g)(viii); 670(1)(b)(i), 670(1)(b)(v); 400(3)(a) IBR 045(1); 110(1),
110(3), 110(3)(g)(viii); 806 (17), 806(17)(a), 806(17)(a)(i), 806(17)(a)(ii),
806(17)(a)(iii), 806(17)(a)(iv), 806(17)(a)(v), 806(17)(a)(vi), 806(17)(a)(vii),
806(17)(a)(viii), 806(17)(a)(ix), 806(17)(b), 806(4)(f)(v), 806(4)(n), 806(4)(j)(iv)(C),
806(4)(k)(v)(C); 815(2)(b)(iii); 830(4)(j)(i), 830(4)(j)(ii), 830(4)(j)(iii), 830(4)(k),
830(4)(k)(i), 830(4)(k)(i)(A), 830(4)(k)(i)(B), 830(4)(k)(i)(C), 830(4)(k)(i)(D),
830(4)(k)(ii), 830(4)(k)(ii)(A), 830(4)(k)(ii)(B), 830 Appendix L 10; 807 introductory
text; 811 IBR 045(1), 841 IBR 045(1).
040 ‘‘performance track member facility’’ definition; 017(5)(b)(ii)(B), 017(5)(b)(ii)(C),
017(5)(b)(ii)(D), 017(5)(b)(ii)(E), 017(5)(b)(ii)(F), 017(5)(b)(ii)(G); 071(3)(w)(iii)(E),
071(3)(s)(ix); 320(2)(c); 330(i); 350(2); 360(2)(j); 380(1), 380(1)(a), 380(1)(b),
380(1)(f), 380(1)(g), 380(1)(i); 645(9)(d), 645(9)(g)(ii), 645(9)(g)(iii), 645(10)(f),
645(10)(g), 645(10)(h)(iii)(A), 645(10)(h)(iii)(B), 645(11)(g); 610(4)(e)(v), 610(6),
610(11); 620(4)(b), 620(6)(b), 620(8)(e); 630(6); 640(2)(a); 640(2)(c)(v)(B),
640(3)(a), 640(3)(c), 640(4)(a)(i), 640(4)(a)(ii), 640(6)(b), 640(6)(b)(ii), 640(6)(b)(i),
640(6)(b)(iii), 640(4)(f), 640(6)(c), 640(6)(d), 640(7)(f); 660(2)(j); 655(8)(b);
140(4)(b)(i), 140(4)(b)(ii), 140(4)(b)(iii), 140(4)(b)(iv), 140(4)(b)(v), 140(4)(b)(v)(A),
140(4)(b)(v)(B); 670(4)(a)(ii), 670(7)(c); 64690 IBR 045(1); 675(2)(a), 675(2)(b),
675(2)(c), 675(4)(a)(iv)(B), 675(4)(g), 675(5)(a); 691(2) IBR 045(1); 695 IBR
045(1); 400(3)(a) IBR 045(1), 400(3)(c)(v)(A), 400(3)(c)(v)(B), 400(3)(c)(v)(D),
400(3)(c)(v)(E), 400(3)(c)(vi)(C), 400(3)(c)(vi)(D), 400(3)(c)(vi)(E), 400(3)(c)(vii)(C),
400(3)(c)(vii)(D),
400(3)(c)(vii)(E),
400(3)(c)(viii)(A),
400(3)(c)(ix)(B),
400(3)(c)(ix)(C), 400(3)(c)(ix)(D), 400(3)(c)(ix)(E), 400(3)(c)(ix)(G), 400(3)(c)(ix)(H),
400(3)(c)(ix)(I), 400(3)(c)(ix)(J), 400(3)(c)(ix)(K), 400(3)(c)(ix)(L), 400(3)(c)(x),
400(3)(c)(xi)(A), 400(3)(c)(xii)(B), 400(3)(a)(xiii), 400(3)(a)(xiii)(B); 140(4)(b)(i),
140(4)(b)(ii),
140(4)(b)(iii),
140(4)(b)(iv),
140(4)(b)(v),
140(4)(b)(v)(A),
140(4)(b)(v)(B);
400(3)(c)(xviii)(A),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(B),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(C),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(D),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(E),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(F),
400(3)(c)(xx)(B),
400(3)(c)(xx)(A), 400(3)(c)(xx)(C), 400(3)(c)(xxii)(A), 400(3)(c)(xxii)(B); 140(2)(c)
IBR 045(1), 140(2)(d) IBR 045(1), 140(2)(e) IBR 045(1), 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1),
140(2)(f) IBR 045(1); 806(4)(a), 806(4)(c)(i), 806(4)(l)(iii)(O); 830(1).
040 ‘‘incompatible waste’’ definition; 040 ‘‘personnel or facility personnel’’ definition;
040 ‘‘universal waste’’ definition; 040 ‘‘used oil’’ definition; 525(2), 525(3) introductory paragraph; 016(5)(a); 070(3); 016(5)(a)(i)(B); 071(3)(aa)(i)(B), 071(3)(aa)(ii),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(A),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(B),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(C),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(D),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(E), 071(3)(aa)(ii)(F), 071(3)(g)(i), 071(3)(r)(ii)(F), 071(3)(r)(iii)(A);
120(3)(b), 120(3)(d), 120(3)(g), 120(3)(f), 120(4)(c); 090(5)(a)(iii), 090(5)(a)(iii)(A),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(I),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(II),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(III),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(IV),
090(5)(a)(iv),
090(5)(a)(iv)(A),
090(5)(a)(iv)(B),
090(5)(a)(iv)(C), 090(5)(a)(iv)(D), 090(5)(a) Note 1, 090(5)(a) Note 2, 090(5)(a)
Note 3, 090(5)(a) Note 4, 090(8)(b); 9904 Footnote; 081(2)(a), 81(2)(a)(i); 9903 Introductory, 9903; 081(1); 082(4) IBR 045(1); 9905; 200(1)(b)(i), 200(1)(b)(ii),
200(1)(b)(iii), 200(1)(b)(iv), 200(1)(b)(v); 230(1) IBR 045(1); 600(3)(f), 600(5);
280(2); 300(5)(h)(iii)(B); 395(1)(a); 282(3)(g), 282(6)(c)(i)(A); 645(8)(a)(i),
645(8)(a)(i)(A), 645(8)(i)(v), 645(9)(a)(ii), 645(9)(g)(iv)(A), 645(10)(h)(ii); 64610(3);
610(2)(b), 610(3)(a)(ix), 610(6), 610(9), 610(8)(c), 610(10)(b)(i)(B); 620(1)(d)(i),
620(3)(c)(ii), 620(4)(b) IBR 045(1), 620(6)(b) IBR 045(1), 620(8)(b) IBR 045(1),
620(10) IBR 045(1); 630(7)(a)(i); 640(4)(c)(iv), 630(4)(d)(iv), 640(4)(e)(ii)(B),
640(4)(e)(ii)(C),
640(4)(e)(ii)(E)(I),
640(4)(e)(ii)(E)(II),
640(4)(e)(iii)(A),
640(4)(e)(iii)(B), 640(4)(g)(i)(C), 640(4)(g)(i)(D), 640(4)(g)(ii)(A)(I); 650(2)(j)(i)(B),
650(2)(j)(iii)(B),
650(2)(I)(i),
650(2)(I)(ii)(B),
650(2)(I)(ii)(C),
650(11)(b)(i),
650(4)(a)(ii); 660(2)(a)(ii)(A)(I), 660(3)(a), 630(3)(b), 660(10)(b); 655(8)(a)(vii),
655(8)(d), 655(12)(a); 665(2)(h)(ii), 665(2)(j)(ii)(B), 665(8)(a), 665(8)(b),
665(9)(b)(i);
140(4)(b)(v)(B);
665(11)(a);
670(5)(b);
64660(3)(d)(iii),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(F), 64660(3)(f)(ii)(E); 64680(5); 64690 IBR 045(1); 646910(5)(f);
675(4)(a)(i), 675(4)(a)(iv)(A), 675(4)(a)(v), 675(4)(b), 675(4)(m)(ii), 675(4)(m)(iii);
680(1), 680(2)(a), 680(2)(b)(xi), 680(2)(c)(iv); 690(1)(c), 690(2) IBR 045(1);
691(1)(f), 691(2) IBR 045(1); 692(1)(a), 692(1)(c), 692(2) IBR 045(1); 695 IBR
045(1); 380(2)(c), 380(2)(d); 400(2)(c)(ii); 290(1)(a); 310(2)(b); 330(1)(c)(ii);
400(3)(a) IBR 045(1); 360(2)(b); 400(3)(c)(viii), 400(3)(c)(ix)(G), 400(3)(c)(ix)(K),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(C); 380(2)(c), 380(2)(d); 525(1)(a); 140(2)(a) IBR 045(1); 803(2);
800(2); 802(2); 800(7)(c)(i); 040 ‘‘on-site’’ definition, 040 ‘‘publicly owned treatment
works (POTW)’’; 806(12); 810(13)(a); 803(3)(k)(vii); 806(4)(a); 282(6)(a)(i);
806(4)(a)(xviii)(C), 806(4)(a)(xxvi), 806(4)(d)(vii), 806(4)(e)(ii), 806(4)(e)(viii),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)(A),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)(B),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)(C),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)(D), 806(4)(I)(iii)(O); 815(3)(b); 282(2)(i); 830(4)(d)(ii)(A), 830
Appendix I; 805(1)(b), 805(7)(b)(ii); 040 ‘‘Universal Waste’’ definition; 573(10)(a),
573(21)(a); 515(2) IBR 045(1), 515(5)(e), 515(4) IBR 045(1), 515(4) Table 1,
515(8) IBR 045(1), 515(9) IBR 045(1), 515(10) IBR 045(1), 515(11) IBR 045(1).
040 ‘‘cathode ray tube’’ definition; 040 ‘‘CRT collector’’ definition; 040 ‘‘CRT glass
manufacturer’’ definition; 040 ‘‘CRT processing’’ definition; 071(3)(oo)(i),
071(3)(oo)(ii), 071(3)(oo)(iii), 071(3)(oo)(iv).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
34677
TABLE 1—EQUIVALENT AND MORE STRINGENT ANALOGUES TO THE FEDERAL PROGRAM—Continued
Regulatory
hecklist 1
Federal requirements
Federal Register
217 2 ......................
NESHAP: Final Standards
for Hazardous Waste
Combustors (Phase I
Final Replacement
Standards and Phase II)
Amendments.
73 FR 18970, 4/8/08 .........
Analogous state authority—Washington’s administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
670(1), 670(1)(b)(i), 670(1)(b)(iii), 670(1)(b)(v).
1 Regulatory Checklist is a document that addresses specific changes made to the Federal regulations by one or more related final rules published in the FEDERAL
REGISTER. EPA develops these checklists as tools to assist States in developing their authorization application and in documenting specific State regulations analogous to the Federal regulations. For more information on EPA’s RCRA State Authorization Guidance see https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/osw/laws-regs/State/index.htm.
2 State rule contains more stringent provisions. For identification of the more stringent State provisions refer to the Docket ID Number EPA–R10–RCRA–2010–0251
for this proposed rule.
TABLE 2—STATE INITIATED CHANGES
State citation—Washington’s
administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
030 ...........................................................
040 ...........................................................
040 ...........................................................
040 ...........................................................
040 ...........................................................
040 ...........................................................
045 ...........................................................
070(7)(c) ..................................................
070(8)(d) ..................................................
071(3)(cc)(ii) .............................................
081(1), 081(1)(a) and 082(1) ...................
*083(2)(b)(iii)(A&(B) .................................
*090(5)(a)(i) and (6)(a)(i), & (iii) ...............
090(6)(a)(ii) ..............................................
110 title ....................................................
110(2)(a)(vi), (2)(b) ..................................
*110(3)(a) .................................................
110(3)(c) ..................................................
*110(3)(f) ..................................................
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
110(3)(e) through (h) ...............................
110(3)(g)(x) ..............................................
110(5) ......................................................
110(6) ......................................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Reason for change
Analogous federal 40 CFR citation
Clarification—Add acronyms (PODC, DRE, APTI,
MACT, TEQ, CAMU, TU).
Clarify definition for Closure—update to clarify
closure applies to recyclers, some generators
and some transporters.
Compliance Procedure—removed the cited dates
and added RCW title.
Person definition—Updated to match Federal rule
Staging Pile definition—Updated to match Federal rule.
Surface Impoundment definition—Change language to reflect Federal definition by deleting
the word ‘‘dangerous’’.
Incorporation by reference updated to July 2007
Clarify that counting exclusion applies to permitby-rule (PBR), not to treatment by generator
activity.
Citations corrected for used oil burned for energy
recovery.
Deletion of incorrect NAICS codes—487110,
722310, 425110.
Clarification on appropriate commercial chemical
product waste code.
Clarification—SW–846 is incorporated by reference at 110(3)(a).
Clarification—SW–846 test method is incorporated by reference at 110(3) Updates to
ASTM and NACE procedures.
Clarify that the NACE test method is the same as
SW–846 Method 1110A.
First sentence revised by adding word ‘‘analytes’’
Clarification on selection of sampling device Reference to AC&D liquid sample removed.
Added ‘‘IIIB Update’’ and ‘‘Final Update IV’’ to
SW 846 reference.
Chemical Testing Methods guidance revisions
and updates.
Clarification—Use test methods in SW–846
Chapter 2 for identifying toxic constituents.
Updated referenced test methods to latest revision date.
Duplicate deleted [see 110(3)(g)(vii)] ....................
Citation correction from ‘‘to approve’’ to ‘‘approval
for the use of’’ an equivalent testing method by
submitting a petition.
Clarification—Test method results need to be reported on a dry weight basis.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
260 related.
262.10.
260 related.
260.10.
260.10.
260.10.
260–280 related.
261/5(c) Intro.
261.5 related.
261.4(a)(12)(i), 261.4(a)(12)(ii).
261.33, 261.31(a).
261.35(b)(2)(iii)(A), 261.35(b)(2)(iii)(B).
261.21(a)(1), 261.22(a)(1), 261.22(a)(2).
261.22(a)(1) and (2).
260.1, 270.6 related.
260.11, 261 (Appendix I, Index).
260.11(a) through (g), related.
Previously authorized as and currently related to
40 CFR 261 Appendix 1—Test Methods.
260.11 Appendix III.
260.11.
260.11(15).
260.21.
Technical clarification, consistent with and no
less stringent than the Federal program, related to 260.21.
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
34678
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2—STATE INITIATED CHANGES—Continued
State citation—Washington’s
administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
110(7) ......................................................
120(4)(c) ..................................................
*140(2)(a) .................................................
140(4)(b)(iv)(B)(I) .....................................
200(1)(b)(ii) & (iii) 200(4)(a)(iv)(A)(II) ......
200(1)(b)(iv) .............................................
270(3) ......................................................
281(4) ......................................................
*300(5)(f) ..................................................
310(1) ......................................................
*380(1)(c) .................................................
*380(1)(f) ..................................................
380(2)(c) ..................................................
400(2)(c)(xiv) 400(2)(c)(xv) ......................
400(3)(c) ..................................................
*400(3)(c)(iii) ............................................
400(3)(c)(iv) Moved from (3)(c)(x) ...........
400(3)(c)(xiii)(A) .......................................
505(1)(b)(iv) .............................................
506(3)(vii) .................................................
510(1)(b)(i)(B) ..........................................
*515(3) .....................................................
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*515(4) .....................................................
*515(8), (9), (10) and (13)(b) ...................
Reason for change
Analogous federal 40 CFR citation
‘‘Ground-Water Monitoring List’’ Appendix IX to
40 CFR part 264 is replaced with the version in
Appendix 5 of the State’s ‘‘Chemical Testing
Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste,
Publication #97–407, June 2009’’ which is incorporated by reference into the WAC at 173–
303–110(1).
Correct second repeated (c)(vii) by renumbering
as (c)(ix).
Clarify that section 110 test methods must be
used.
ASTM Test method update ...................................
Delete ‘‘stress of installation’’ phrase and insert in
640 and 675.
Correct the Federal references by substituting
State citations for closure and financial assurance. The word ‘‘shall’’ was changed to ‘‘must’’.
49 CFR 171.16 reference—updated transporter
spill reporting address and method.
Citations corrected from WAC 173–303–840 to
WAC 173–303–830.
Clarify that section 110 test methods must be
where specific WAC citations are referenced.
Reworded to be consistent with Federal rule .......
Clarify that section 110 test methods must be
used where specific 40 CFR citations are referenced.
Add ‘‘incorporated by reference’’ for clarity and
clarified that section 110 test methods must be
used where specific WAC citations are referenced.
Add ‘‘tons (2000 lbs)’’ to unit of measure Table 1
Language added for equivalence with Federal
rule.
Added the word ‘‘qualified’’ to the description of
an independent registered professional engineer. This occurs nineteen times in the sub
subsection.
Clarify that section 110 test methods must be
used where specific 40 CFR 265 subparts are
referenced.
Reference regarding Subpart B is changed because the only part of Subpart B that is incorporated by reference is 265.19.
Correction—the word carbonaceous replaces carcinogen.
Citation corrected ..................................................
Deleted CFC recycling exception from closure
and financial responsibility requirements.
Correct internal citation .........................................
Clarify that section 110(3) test methods must be
used.
Clarify that section 110(3) test methods must be
used.
Clarify that section 110(3) test methods must be
used.
610(3)(a)(ix), (3)(b)(ii)(D), (8)(b)(iv), and
(8)(d)(ii)(D).
610(6) & (11) ...........................................
Citation corrected ..................................................
610(12)(e) 620(1)(e)(ii) ............................
Correction—change ‘‘resource reclamation units’’
to ‘‘recycling units’’.
Clarification that corporate guarantors are also
subject to a minimum net worth criteria.
620(4)(d)(iv) .............................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Add ‘‘qualified’’ to PE description ..........................
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
264 Appendix IX.
261.6(c)(2).
268 related, conforming change to reflect retention of use of SW–846 methods.
264.314(e).
262.34(a)(1)Intro, 262.34(a)(1)(ii), 262.34(a)(1)(iii).
262.34(a)(1)(iv).
263.30(c)(2).
124.31(a).
264.13(b)(6), 265.13(b)(6), 264.73(b)(3),
265.73(b)(3), conforming change to reflect retention of use of SW–846 methods.
264.14, 265.14.
264.73(b)(3), 265.73(b)(3), conforming change to
reflect retention of use of SW–846 methods.
264.73(b)(6), 265.73(b)(6), conforming change to
reflect retention of use of SW–846 methods.
264 Appendix I (2) Table 1, 265 Appendix I (2)
Table 1.
265.1(c)(5).
265 related—more stringent State requirement.
265 related, conforming change to reflect retention of use of SW–846 methods.
265.19.
265.300 Subpart N—Landfills, related.
266.20.
264.110, 265.110 Subpart G related, 264.140,
265.140 Subpart H related.
260.30(b)
Introduction,
260.30(b)(1),
266.100(b)(1).
279.10, conforming change to reflect retention of
use of SW–846 methods.
279.11, conforming change to reflect retention of
use of SW–846 methods.
279.40–47, 279.50–59, 279.60–67, 279.10, conforming change to reflect retention of use of
SW–846 methods.
264.112 related.
264.115, 264.120—more stringent State requirement.
264.143.
264.143.
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
34679
TABLE 2—STATE INITIATED CHANGES—Continued
State citation—Washington’s
administrative code (WAC)
(WAC 173–303–* * *)
620(4)(c) 620(4)(e)(i) 620(4)(f) ................
620(4)(d)(i) ...............................................
620(4)(d)(iv) .............................................
620(5)(c), 620(5)(d), 620(7) .....................
*640(1)(b) .................................................
*645(4)(a) and (b) *645(9)(g)(ii), (iii) and
(iv)(A)
645(10)(g)
64610(4)
806(4)(a)(xx)(D)(II).
645(8)(c) ..................................................
640(4)(c)(i) & 675(4)(a)(v) .......................
64660(3)(d)(iv)(F) .....................................
665(13) ....................................................
*690 *691 .................................................
806(2)(a) ..................................................
*806(4)(f)(iii)(A)(III) ...................................
806(8) ......................................................
*807(2)(a)(iii) ............................................
810(11)(c) ................................................
810(16) ....................................................
830(4)(b)(vii) ............................................
*910(2)(d) .................................................
910(3) ......................................................
9901; 9902 ...............................................
Reason for change
Analogous federal 40 CFR citation
New financial instrument option—‘‘assigned security deposit’’ for used oil processors and recyclers.
Clarification that used oil processors may use
partially funded trust funds.
Clarification that corporate guarantors are also
subject to a minimum net worth criteria.
Edit—add hyphen to post-closure .........................
Provide title for test method Clarification that
SW–846 is incorporated by reference.
Note that the 40 CFR 264 Appendix IX GroundWater monitoring list is included as Appendix 5
in the ‘‘Chemical Testing Methods for Dangerous Waste, Publication #97–407, June
2009’’, which is incorporated by reference at
WAC 173–303–110(1).
Update reference to Chapter 173–160 WAC ........
Relocate ‘‘stress of installation’’ phrase from 200
Correct ‘‘SW846’’ to read ‘‘SW–846’’ ....................
New subsection Added a reference to the liquid
waste disposal provision in 140(4)(b).
Deleted proposed language requiring use of
110(3)(a) test methods.
Citation corrected ..................................................
Clarification that equivalent analytical techniques
must be approved by ecology.
Updated permit application requirements for consistency with Federal rule and clarified that facilities must consult with Ecology about submittal of exposure information.
Clarification that equivalent analytical techniques
must be approved by Ecology.
Duplicate provision deleted ...................................
Citation corrected ..................................................
Citation corrected ..................................................
Clarify that approved equivalent test methods will
be incorporated at 110(3).
Clarify that exemption petitions also go to EPA
for Federal listed wastes.
Delete obsolete title ...............................................
264.143.
264.143.
264.143.
264.143.
264.190.
264 Appendix IX.
264.97(c).
264.573. 264.193.
264.552 related (CAMU).
264.314.
264.1030, 264.1050 (Air Emissions for Vents,
and Equipment Leaks).
270.10.
270.19.
270.10(c).
270.62.
270.30(j)(2).
270.30(m).
270.42(b) related.
260.20(a), 260.21(d).
260.22(d)(1)(i).
260 Appendix I, related.
* These State citations were amended to clarify that SW–846 test methods must be used, or in some cases requiring the use of test methods
specifically called out in WAC 173–303–110.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
G. Where are the revised State rules
different from the Federal rules?
This section does not discuss all the
program differences, because in most
instances Washington writes its own
version of the Federal hazardous waste
rules. This section highlights those more
notable differences between the revised
State rules and the Federal rules. The
State regulations that EPA is proposing
to authorize are located in Tables 1 and
2 in Section F above, and by viewing the
Docket. There are certain portions of the
Federal program which are not
delegable to the States because of the
Federal government’s special role in
foreign policy matters and because of
national concerns that arise with certain
decisions. For example, EPA does not
delegate import/export functions. Under
RCRA regulations found in 40 CFR part
262, EPA will continue to implement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements for import/export
functions. However, the State rules
found at WAC 173–303–230 reference
EPA’s export and import requirements
and the State has amended these
references to include those changes
promulgated in the Federal rule
‘‘Corrections to Errors in the Code of
Federal Regulation, (71 FR 40254, 7/14/
06)’’.
The State did not adopt the Federal
Methods Innovation Rule (70 FR 34537,
6/14/05) which amended a variety of
testing and monitoring requirements
found in RCRA and removed from the
Federal regulations a requirement to use
the methods found in ‘‘EPA’s Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods,’’ also
known as ‘‘SW–846’’ in conducting
various testing and monitoring. The
State retained the RCRA-related
sampling and analysis requirement to
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
use the testing methods found in ‘‘SW–
846,’’ and EPA considers these changes
to be state-initiated changes within the
scope of Ecology’s existing
authorization that are consistent with
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. (Note: The State does have an
existing state-only petition process for
deviating from ‘‘SW–846’’ for equivalent
testing methods, found at WAC 173–
303–110(5) which is not part of its stateonly rule and isn’t part of the federallyauthorized program. In Section F, Table
2, the State citations identified with an
asterisk (*) indicate those state
provisions where the State clarifies that
‘‘SW–846’’ testing methods must be
used.)
We found that the State’s definition of
‘‘Designated facility’’ found at WAC
173–303–040 is equivalent to the
Federal definition found at 40 CFR
260.10, with the exception of one
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
34680
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
broader in scope phrase that is a stateonly requirement. The broader in scope
phrase which will not be authorized is:
‘‘The following are designated facilities
only for receipt of State-only waste; they
cannot receive federal hazardous waste
from off-site: Facilities operating under
WAC 173–303–500(2)(c).’’
States are allowed to seek
authorization for more stringent
requirements than the Federal program.
EPA has the authority to authorize and
enforce those parts of a State’s program
EPA finds to be more stringent than the
Federal program. The State revised its
previous federally authorized mercurycontaining equipment requirements
with the adoption of the Federal Rule
for Mercury-Containing Equipment
Universal Waste (70 FR 45508, 8/5/06).
The State’s revised mercury-containing
equipment universal waste rule is more
stringent than the Federal rule as the
State regulates lamps at a lower
accumulation limit than the Federal
rule. Specifically, the State’s definitions
of small and large quantity handlers of
universal waste found at WAC 173–
303–040 are more stringent than the
Federal definitions found at 40 CFR
273.9; and the State’s large quantity
handlers of universal waste notification
standards found at WAC 173–303–
573(19)(b)(v) are more stringent than the
Federal notification standards found at
40 CFR 273.32(b)(5). Additionally, the
State adopted some portions of the
Federal Burden Reduction Initiative
Rule (70 FR 16862, 4/4/06). The State’s
rule retains many of the Federal
requirements that were reduced by the
Federal Burden Reduction Initiative
Rule, and as a result those requirements
retained by the State are more stringent
than their Federal counterparts. The
State’s definitions of ‘‘Cathode ray tubes
(CRT) and CRT collector’’ found at WAC
173–303–040 are more stringent than
the Federal CRT definitions found at 40
CFR 260.10, because the State defines a
CRT to mean all categories of CRTs
(intact, used and broken) and requires
that all CRTs be managed (WAC 173–
303–071(3)(oo)(i)–(iv)) under the same
standards used in the federal program
for used and broken CRTs (40 CFR
261.39).
H. Who handles permits after this
authorization takes effect?
After authorization, Washington will
continue to issue permits for all the
provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. If EPA issued permits prior to
authorizing Washington for these
revisions, these permits would continue
in force according to the terms of such
permits until the effective date of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
State’s issuance or denial of a State
hazardous waste management permit, at
which time, EPA would modify the
existing EPA permit to expire at an
earlier date, terminate the existing EPA
permit for cause, or allow the existing
EPA permit to otherwise expire by its
terms, except for those facilities located
in Indian Country. EPA will not issue
any new permits, permit components, or
new portions of permits for the
provisions listed in Section G after the
effective date of this authorization. EPA
will continue to implement and issue
permits for HSWA requirements for
which Washington is not yet authorized.
I. What is codification and is EPA
codifying Washington’s hazardous
waste program as authorized in this
proposed rule?
Codification is the process of placing
the State’s statutes and regulations that
comprise the State’s authorized
hazardous waste program into the Code
of Federal Regulations. This is done by
referencing the authorized State rules in
40 CFR part 272. EPA is reserving the
amendment of 40 CFR part 272, Subpart
WW for this authorization of
Washington’s program revisions until a
later date.
J. How does today’s action affect Indian
Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Washington?
EPA’s proposed decision to authorize
the Washington hazardous waste
management program does not include
any land that is, or becomes after the
date of authorization, ‘‘Indian Country,’’
as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151, with the
exception of the non-trust lands within
the exterior boundaries of the Puyallup
Indian Reservation (also referred to as
the ‘‘1873 Survey Area’’ or ‘‘Survey
Area’’) located in Tacoma, Washington.
EPA retains jurisdiction over ‘‘Indian
Country’’. Effective October 22, 1998 (63
FR 50531, 9/22/98) the State of
Washington was authorized to
implement the State’s Federallyauthorized hazardous waste
management program on the non-trust
lands within the 1873 Survey Area of
the Puyallup Indian Reservation. The
authorization did not extend to trust
lands within the reservation. EPA
retains its authority to implement RCRA
on trust lands and over Indians and
Indian activities within the 1873 Survey
Area.
K. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This proposed rule seeks to revise the
State of Washington’s authorized
hazardous waste management program
pursuant to section 3006 of RCRA and
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
imposes no requirements other than
those currently imposed by State law.
This proposed rule complies with
applicable executive orders and
statutory provisions as follows:
1. Executive Order 12866
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), the Agency
must determine whether the regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’, and therefore
subject to OMB review and the
requirements of the Executive Order.
The Executive Order defines ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as one that is likely to
result in a rule that may: (1) Have an
annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more, or adversely affect in
a material way, the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order. EPA has determined that this
proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 and is therefore
not subject to OMB review.
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed action does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,
because this proposed rule does not
establish or modify any information or
recordkeeping requirements for the
regulated community and only seeks to
authorize the pre-existing requirements
under State law and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information,
processing, and maintaining
information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information. An Agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in Title 40 of the CFR
are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
3. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires Federal agencies to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
of any rule subject to notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impacts of
today’s proposed rule on small entities,
small entity is defined as: (1) A small
business defined by the Small Business
Administration’s size regulations at 13
CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental
jurisdiction that is a government of a
city, county, town, school district, or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small
organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. I certify that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because the
proposed rule will only have the effect
of authorizing pre-existing requirements
under State law and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. EPA continues to
be interested in the potential impacts of
the proposed rule on small entities and
welcomes comments on issues related to
such impacts.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
Statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result
in expenditures and final rules with
‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result in
expenditures to State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
in any one year. Before promulgating an
EPA rule for which a written Statement
is needed section 205 of the UMRA
generally requires EPA to identify and
consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule. The
provisions of section 205 do not apply
when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows EPA to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective,
or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the rule
an explanation why the alternative was
not adopted. Before EPA establishes any
regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements. Today’s
proposed rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector. It imposes no new
enforceable duty on any State, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
Similarly, EPA has also determined that
this proposed rule contains no
regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small
government entities. Thus, today’s
proposed rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 203 of
the UMRA.
5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This proposed rule does not have
Federalism implications. It will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government, as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). This rule proposes to authorize
pre-existing State rules. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this
proposed rule. In the spirit of Executive
Order 13132, and consistent with EPA
policy to promote communications
between EPA and State and local
governments, EPA specifically solicits
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34681
comment on this proposed rule from
State and local officials.
6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (59 FR
22951, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This proposed rule does
not have tribal implications, as specified
in Executive Order 13175 because EPA
retains its authority over Indian
Country. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this proposed rule.
EPA specifically solicits additional
comment on this proposed rule from
tribal officials.
7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it
proposes to approve a State program.
8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This proposed rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined under
Executive Order 12866.
9. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
34682
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 117 / Friday, June 18, 2010 / Proposed Rules
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards. This proposed
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards. Therefore, EPA is not
considering the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
10. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low
Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA
has determined that this proposed rule
will not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations. This proposed
rule does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment because this rule
proposes to authorize pre-existing State
rules which are equivalent to, and no
less stringent than existing Federal
requirements.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous materials transportation,
Hazardous waste, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Authority: This proposed action is issued
under the authority of sections 2002(a), 3006
and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act,
as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:12 Jun 17, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: June 1, 2010.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2010–13851 Filed 6–17–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
2.B.2 Figure 2–1, paragraphs 34(c), (d),
and (e), of Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD. The correct reference is to
section 2.B.2 Figure 2–1, paragraphs
34(a) and (d) of the Instruction.
Correction
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 97 and 148
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0091]
RIN 1625–AB47
Bulk Solid Hazardous Materials:
Harmonization With the International
Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC)
Code; Correction
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document corrects the
preamble to a proposed rule published
in the Federal Register on June 17,
2010, entitled ‘‘Bulk Solid Hazardous
Materials: Harmonization With the
International Maritime Solid Bulk
Cargoes (IMSBC) Code.’’ This correction
provides correct information with
regard to the preliminary environmental
analysis checklist.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Richard Bornhorst,
Office of Operating and Environmental
Standards, Hazardous Materials
Standards Division (CG–5223), Coast
Guard, telephone 202–372–1426, e-mail
Richard.C.Bornhorst@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard is correcting a portion of the
preamble to the proposed rule
discussing the preliminary
environmental analysis checklist. The
preamble incorrectly refers to section
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
In the proposed rule ‘‘Bulk Solid
Hazardous Materials: Harmonization
With the International Maritime Solid
Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code,’’ which
published in the June 17, 2010, issue of
the Federal Register, make the
following correction in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. In
section VII.M., correct the paragraph
following ‘‘M. Environment’’ to read as
follows:
‘‘We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ section of this
preamble. This rule involves regulations
that are editorial or procedural and the
equipping of vessels, and falls under
section 2.B.2. Figure 2–1, paragraphs
34(a) and (d) of Commandant
Instruction M16475.lD. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.’’
Dated: June 15, 2010.
Steve G. Venckus,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law, United States Coast
Guard.
[FR Doc. 2010–14737 Filed 6–16–10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\18JNP1.SGM
18JNP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 117 (Friday, June 18, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34674-34682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13851]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R10-RCRA 2010-0251; FRL-9160-7]
Washington: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Washington has applied to EPA for final authorization of
certain changes to its hazardous waste management program under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended, (RCRA). EPA has
reviewed Washington's application and has preliminarily determined that
these changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is proposing to authorize Washington's changes.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received by July 19,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R10-RCRA-2010-0251 by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Kocourek.Nina@epa.gov.
Mail: Nina Kocourek, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste & Toxics (AWT-122), 1200 Sixth Avenue,
Suite 900, Seattle, Washington 98101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number EPA-R10-
RCRA-2010-0251. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters or any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy. You may view and copy
the Washington application, during normal business hours, at the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air, Waste &
Toxics, Mailstop AWT-122, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle,
Washington 98101, contact: Nina Kocourek, phone number: (206) 553-6502
or at the Washington State Department of Ecology, 300 Desmond Drive,
Lacey, Washington 98503, contact: Robert Rieck, phone number (360) 407-
6751.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nina Kocourek, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air, Waste & Toxics (AWT-122),
1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Seattle, Washington 98101, phone number:
(206) 553-6502, e-mail: kocourek.nina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
management program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes.
Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain other
changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs because
of changes to EPA's regulations in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) parts 124, 260 through 266, 268, 270, 273, and 279.
B. What decisions have we made in this rule?
We have preliminarily determined that Washington's application to
revise its authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established by RCRA. Therefore, we propose to grant
Washington final authorization to operate its hazardous waste
management program with the changes as described in its revised program
application. Washington will have responsibility for permitting
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) within its borders,
except in Indian country (18 U.S.C. 1151), and for carrying out the
aspects of the RCRA program described in its revised program
application, subject to the limitations of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA, which are more stringent than existing
requirements, take effect in authorized States before the State is
authorized for these requirements. Thus, EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in Washington, including issuing permits,
until the State is granted authorization to do so.
C. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
If Washington is authorized for these changes, a facility in
Washington subject to RCRA will have to comply with the authorized
State requirements instead of the corresponding Federal requirements in
order to comply with RCRA. Additionally, such persons will
[[Page 34675]]
have to comply with any applicable Federal requirements, such as HSWA
regulations issued by EPA for which the State has not received
authorization and RCRA requirements that are not supplanted by
authorized State-issued requirements. Washington has enforcement
responsibilities under its State hazardous waste program for violations
of its program, but EPA retains its independent enforcement authority
under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, which include, among
others, authority to:
Conduct inspections; require monitoring, tests, analyses,
or reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements; suspend, terminate, modify or
revoke permits; and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions.
The proposed action to approve these revisions would not impose
additional requirements on the regulated community because the
regulations for which Washington will be authorized are already
effective under State law and are not changed by the act of
authorization.
D. What happens if EPA receives comments on this action?
If EPA receives comments on this proposed action, we will address
those comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization,
you must do so at this time.
E. What has Washington previously been authorized for?
Washington initially received final authorization on January 30,
1986, effective January 31, 1986 (51 FR 3782), to implement the State's
dangerous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to Washington's program on September 22, 1987, effective on
November 23, 1987 (52 FR 35556); August 17, 1990, effective October 16,
1990 (55 FR 33695); November 4, 1994, effective November 4, 1994 (59 FR
55322); February 29, 1996, effective April 29, 1996 (61 FR 7736);
September 22, 1998, effective October 22, 1998 (63 FR 50531); October
12, 1999, effective January 11, 2000 (64 FR 55142); April 11, 2002,
effective April 11, 2002 (67 FR 17636); April 14, 2006, effective June
13, 2006 (71 FR 19442) and on October 30, 2006 effective December 29,
2006 (71 FR 63253).
F. What changes are we proposing?
On May 18, 2010, Washington submitted a hazardous waste management
program revision application seeking authorization of its changes in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. On May 28, 2010 we determined that
Washington's program revision application was complete. We have
preliminarily determined that Washington's hazardous waste management
program revision satisfies all requirements necessary to qualify for
final authorization. Therefore, we propose to grant Washington final
authorization for the following program changes as identified in Table
1 and Table 2 below. Note: The RCRA regulations the State is seeking
authorization for and are incorporated by reference are those as
published in 40 CFR parts 260 through 265, 268, 270, and 279, as of
July 1, 2007, unless otherwise noted; and all of the referenced
analogous State authorities were legally adopted and effective State
rules as of July 31, 2009.
Table 1--Equivalent and More Stringent Analogues to the Federal Program
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analogous state
authority--Washington's
Regulatory checklist Federal requirements Federal Register administrative code
1 (WAC) (WAC 173-303-* *
*)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17S................... HSWA Codification Rule-- 50 FR 28702, 7/15/85.......... 800(8); 800(12).
Exposure Information.
117B 2................ Toxicity Characteristic 57 FR 23062, 6/1/92........... 070(3) except
Amendment. 070(3)(a)(iii) and
070(3)(c).
203 2................. Recycled used Oil Management 68 FR 44659, 7/30/03.......... 070(8)(c); 515(3)
Standards; Clarification. Incorporated by
Reference (IBR) 045(1);
515(11) IBR 045(1).
205................... NESHAP: Surface Coating of 69 FR 22601, 4/26/04.......... 691(1)(g); 400(3)(a).
Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks.
207 2 and 207.1 2..... Uniform Hazardous Waste 70 FR 10766, 3/4/05 as amended 040 ``designated
Manifest Rule and Amendment. on 6/16/05 at 70 FR 35034. facility'' definition;
040 ``manifest''
definition; 040
``manifest tracking
number'' definition;
160(2)(a),
160(2)(a)(ii),
160(2)(a)(iii); 180,
180(1), 180(7),
180(7)(a) IBR 045(1),
180(7)(b),
180(7)(b)(i),
180(7)(b)(ii),
180(7)(b)(iii),
180(7)(b)(iv),
180(7)(c), 180(8),
180(8)(a), 180(8)(b);
190(3), 190(3)(b),
190(4); 200, 200(6),
200(6)(a), 200(6)(b);
230 IBR 045(1), 230(2),
230(2)(c), 230(2)(d),
230(2)(e); 180(1) IBR
045(1); 250, 250(1)(a),
250(1)(b), 250(9),
250(9)(a), 250(9)(b),
250(9)(c), 250(9)(d),
250(5), 250(6),
250(6)(a), 250(6)(b),
250(6)(b)(i),
250(6)(b)(ii); 370,
370(1); 370(2),
370(2)(a), 370(2)(b),
370(2)(c), 370(2)(d),
370(2)(e), 370(3),
370(4)(d), 370(8),
370(5), 370(5)(a),
370(5)(a)(i),
370(5)(a)(ii),
370(5)(a)(iii),
370(5)(b), 370(5)(c),
370(5)(d)(i),
370(5)(d)(ii),
370(5)(e),
370(5)(e)(i),
370(5)(e)(ii),
370(5)(e)(iii),
370(5)(e)(iv),
370(5)(e)(v),
370(5)(e)(vi),
370(5)(e)(vii),
370(5)(f),
370(5)(f)(i),
370(5)(f)(ii),
370(5)(f)(iii),
370(5)(f)(iv),
370(5)(f)(v),
370(5)(f)(vi),
370(5)(f)(vii),
370(5)(g); 390(1),
390(1)(a), 390(1)(b),
390(1)(c), 390(1)(d),
390(1)(e), 390(1)(f),
390(1)(g).
209 2................. Universal Waste Rule: Specific 70 FR 45508, 8/5/05........... 040 ``mercury-containing
Provisions for Mercury equipment'' definition;
Containing Equipment. 040 ``universal waste''
definition; 077(2);
600(3)(o)(ii);
400(2)(c)(xi)(B);
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1);
800(7)(c)(iii)(B);
573(1)(a)(ii),
573(3)(a), 573(3)(b),
573(3)(b)(i),
573(3)(b)(ii),
573(3)(b)(iii),
573(3)(c)(i),
573(3)(c)(ii); 040
``ampule'' definition;
040 ``large quantity
handler of universal
waste'' definition; 040
``mercury containing
equipment'' definition;
040 ``small quantity
handler of universal
waste'' definition; 040
``universal waste''
definition; 573(9)(b),
573(9)(b)(i),
573(9)(b)(ii),
573(9)(b)(ii)(A),
573(9)(b)(ii)(B),
573(9)(b)(ii)(C),
573(9)(b)(ii)(D),
573(9)(b)(ii)(E),
573(9)(b)(ii)(F),
573(9)(b)(ii)(G),
573(9)(b)(ii)(H),
573(9)(b)(iii),
573(9)(b)(iii)(A),
573(9)(b)(iii)(B),
573(9)(b)(iv)(A),
573(9)(b)(iv)(A)(I),
573(9)(b)(iv)(A)(II),
573(9)(b)(iv)(B),
573(9)(b)(iv)(C),
573(10)(b)(i),
573(10)(b)(ii),
573(19)(b)(iv),
573(19)(b)(v),
573(20)(b),
573(20(b)(i),
573(20)(b)(ii),
573(20)(b)(ii)(A),
573(20)(b)(ii)(B),
573(20)(b)(ii)(C),
573(20)(b)(ii)(D),
573(20)(b)(ii)(E),
573(20)(b)(ii)(F),
573(20)(b)(ii)(G),
573(20)(b)(ii)(H),
573(20)(b)(iii),
573(20)(b)(iii)(A),
573(20)(b)(iii)(B),
573(20)(b)(iv)(A),
573(20)(b)(iv)(A)(I),
573(20)(b)(iv)(A)(II),
573(20)(b)(iv)(B),
573(20)(b)(iv)(C),
573(21)(b)(i),
573(21)(b)(ii).
[[Page 34676]]
212................... NESHAP: Final Standards for 70 FR 59402, 10/12/05......... 110(1), 110(3)(g)(viii);
Hazardous Waste Combustors 670(1)(b)(i),
(Phase I Final Replacement 670(1)(b)(v); 400(3)(a)
Standards and Phase II). IBR 045(1); 110(1),
110(3),
110(3)(g)(viii); 806
(17), 806(17)(a),
806(17)(a)(i),
806(17)(a)(ii),
806(17)(a)(iii),
806(17)(a)(iv),
806(17)(a)(v),
806(17)(a)(vi),
806(17)(a)(vii),
806(17)(a)(viii),
806(17)(a)(ix),
806(17)(b),
806(4)(f)(v),
806(4)(n),
806(4)(j)(iv)(C),
806(4)(k)(v)(C);
815(2)(b)(iii);
830(4)(j)(i),
830(4)(j)(ii),
830(4)(j)(iii),
830(4)(k),
830(4)(k)(i),
830(4)(k)(i)(A),
830(4)(k)(i)(B),
830(4)(k)(i)(C),
830(4)(k)(i)(D),
830(4)(k)(ii),
830(4)(k)(ii)(A),
830(4)(k)(ii)(B), 830
Appendix L 10; 807
introductory text; 811
IBR 045(1), 841 IBR
045(1).
213 2................. Burden Reduction Initiative... 71 FR 16862, 4/4/06........... 040 ``performance track
member facility''
definition;
017(5)(b)(ii)(B),
017(5)(b)(ii)(C),
017(5)(b)(ii)(D),
017(5)(b)(ii)(E),
017(5)(b)(ii)(F),
017(5)(b)(ii)(G);
071(3)(w)(iii)(E),
071(3)(s)(ix);
320(2)(c); 330(i);
350(2); 360(2)(j);
380(1), 380(1)(a),
380(1)(b), 380(1)(f),
380(1)(g), 380(1)(i);
645(9)(d),
645(9)(g)(ii),
645(9)(g)(iii),
645(10)(f), 645(10)(g),
645(10)(h)(iii)(A),
645(10)(h)(iii)(B),
645(11)(g);
610(4)(e)(v), 610(6),
610(11); 620(4)(b),
620(6)(b), 620(8)(e);
630(6); 640(2)(a);
640(2)(c)(v)(B),
640(3)(a), 640(3)(c),
640(4)(a)(i),
640(4)(a)(ii),
640(6)(b),
640(6)(b)(ii),
640(6)(b)(i),
640(6)(b)(iii),
640(4)(f), 640(6)(c),
640(6)(d), 640(7)(f);
660(2)(j); 655(8)(b);
140(4)(b)(i),
140(4)(b)(ii),
140(4)(b)(iii),
140(4)(b)(iv),
140(4)(b)(v),
140(4)(b)(v)(A),
140(4)(b)(v)(B);
670(4)(a)(ii),
670(7)(c); 64690 IBR
045(1); 675(2)(a),
675(2)(b), 675(2)(c),
675(4)(a)(iv)(B),
675(4)(g), 675(5)(a);
691(2) IBR 045(1); 695
IBR 045(1); 400(3)(a)
IBR 045(1),
400(3)(c)(v)(A),
400(3)(c)(v)(B),
400(3)(c)(v)(D),
400(3)(c)(v)(E),
400(3)(c)(vi)(C),
400(3)(c)(vi)(D),
400(3)(c)(vi)(E),
400(3)(c)(vii)(C),
400(3)(c)(vii)(D),
400(3)(c)(vii)(E),
400(3)(c)(viii)(A),
400(3)(c)(ix)(B),
400(3)(c)(ix)(C),
400(3)(c)(ix)(D),
400(3)(c)(ix)(E),
400(3)(c)(ix)(G),
400(3)(c)(ix)(H),
400(3)(c)(ix)(I),
400(3)(c)(ix)(J),
400(3)(c)(ix)(K),
400(3)(c)(ix)(L),
400(3)(c)(x),
400(3)(c)(xi)(A),
400(3)(c)(xii)(B),
400(3)(a)(xiii),
400(3)(a)(xiii)(B);
140(4)(b)(i),
140(4)(b)(ii),
140(4)(b)(iii),
140(4)(b)(iv),
140(4)(b)(v),
140(4)(b)(v)(A),
140(4)(b)(v)(B);
400(3)(c)(xviii)(A),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(B),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(C),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(D),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(E),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(F),
400(3)(c)(xx)(B),
400(3)(c)(xx)(A),
400(3)(c)(xx)(C),
400(3)(c)(xxii)(A),
400(3)(c)(xxii)(B);
140(2)(c) IBR 045(1),
140(2)(d) IBR 045(1),
140(2)(e) IBR 045(1),
140(2)(a) IBR 045(1),
140(2)(f) IBR 045(1);
806(4)(a),
806(4)(c)(i),
806(4)(l)(iii)(O);
830(1).
214 2................. Corrections to Errors in the 71 FR 40254, 7/14/06.......... 040 ``incompatible
Code of Federal Regulations. waste'' definition; 040
``personnel or facility
personnel'' definition;
040 ``universal waste''
definition; 040 ``used
oil'' definition;
525(2), 525(3)
introductory paragraph;
016(5)(a); 070(3);
016(5)(a)(i)(B);
071(3)(aa)(i)(B),
071(3)(aa)(ii),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(A),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(B),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(C),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(D),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(E),
071(3)(aa)(ii)(F),
071(3)(g)(i),
071(3)(r)(ii)(F),
071(3)(r)(iii)(A);
120(3)(b), 120(3)(d),
120(3)(g), 120(3)(f),
120(4)(c);
090(5)(a)(iii),
090(5)(a)(iii)(A),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(I),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(II),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(III),
090(5)(a)(iii)(B)(IV),
090(5)(a)(iv),
090(5)(a)(iv)(A),
090(5)(a)(iv)(B),
090(5)(a)(iv)(C),
090(5)(a)(iv)(D),
090(5)(a) Note 1,
090(5)(a) Note 2,
090(5)(a) Note 3,
090(5)(a) Note 4,
090(8)(b); 9904
Footnote; 081(2)(a),
81(2)(a)(i); 9903
Introductory, 9903;
081(1); 082(4) IBR
045(1); 9905;
200(1)(b)(i),
200(1)(b)(ii),
200(1)(b)(iii),
200(1)(b)(iv),
200(1)(b)(v); 230(1)
IBR 045(1); 600(3)(f),
600(5); 280(2);
300(5)(h)(iii)(B);
395(1)(a); 282(3)(g),
282(6)(c)(i)(A);
645(8)(a)(i),
645(8)(a)(i)(A),
645(8)(i)(v),
645(9)(a)(ii),
645(9)(g)(iv)(A),
645(10)(h)(ii);
64610(3); 610(2)(b),
610(3)(a)(ix), 610(6),
610(9), 610(8)(c),
610(10)(b)(i)(B);
620(1)(d)(i),
620(3)(c)(ii),
620(4)(b) IBR 045(1),
620(6)(b) IBR 045(1),
620(8)(b) IBR 045(1),
620(10) IBR 045(1);
630(7)(a)(i);
640(4)(c)(iv),
630(4)(d)(iv),
640(4)(e)(ii)(B),
640(4)(e)(ii)(C),
640(4)(e)(ii)(E)(I),
640(4)(e)(ii)(E)(II),
640(4)(e)(iii)(A),
640(4)(e)(iii)(B),
640(4)(g)(i)(C),
640(4)(g)(i)(D),
640(4)(g)(ii)(A)(I);
650(2)(j)(i)(B),
650(2)(j)(iii)(B),
650(2)(I)(i),
650(2)(I)(ii)(B),
650(2)(I)(ii)(C),
650(11)(b)(i),
650(4)(a)(ii);
660(2)(a)(ii)(A)(I),
660(3)(a), 630(3)(b),
660(10)(b);
655(8)(a)(vii),
655(8)(d), 655(12)(a);
665(2)(h)(ii),
665(2)(j)(ii)(B),
665(8)(a), 665(8)(b),
665(9)(b)(i);
140(4)(b)(v)(B);
665(11)(a); 670(5)(b);
64660(3)(d)(iii),
64660(3)(d)(iv)(F),
64660(3)(f)(ii)(E);
64680(5); 64690 IBR
045(1); 646910(5)(f);
675(4)(a)(i),
675(4)(a)(iv)(A),
675(4)(a)(v),
675(4)(b),
675(4)(m)(ii),
675(4)(m)(iii); 680(1),
680(2)(a),
680(2)(b)(xi),
680(2)(c)(iv);
690(1)(c), 690(2) IBR
045(1); 691(1)(f),
691(2) IBR 045(1);
692(1)(a), 692(1)(c),
692(2) IBR 045(1); 695
IBR 045(1); 380(2)(c),
380(2)(d);
400(2)(c)(ii);
290(1)(a); 310(2)(b);
330(1)(c)(ii);
400(3)(a) IBR 045(1);
360(2)(b);
400(3)(c)(viii),
400(3)(c)(ix)(G),
400(3)(c)(ix)(K),
400(3)(c)(xviii)(C);
380(2)(c), 380(2)(d);
525(1)(a); 140(2)(a)
IBR 045(1); 803(2);
800(2); 802(2);
800(7)(c)(i); 040 ``on-
site'' definition, 040
``publicly owned
treatment works
(POTW)''; 806(12);
810(13)(a);
803(3)(k)(vii);
806(4)(a);
282(6)(a)(i);
806(4)(a)(xviii)(C),
806(4)(a)(xxvi),
806(4)(d)(vii),
806(4)(e)(ii),
806(4)(e)(viii),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)
(A),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)
(B),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)
(C),
806(4)(g)(viii)(B)(vii)
(D), 806(4)(I)(iii)(O);
815(3)(b); 282(2)(i);
830(4)(d)(ii)(A), 830
Appendix I; 805(1)(b),
805(7)(b)(ii); 040
``Universal Waste''
definition; 573(10)(a),
573(21)(a); 515(2) IBR
045(1), 515(5)(e),
515(4) IBR 045(1),
515(4) Table 1, 515(8)
IBR 045(1), 515(9) IBR
045(1), 515(10) IBR
045(1), 515(11) IBR
045(1).
215 2................. Cathode Ray Tubes Rule........ 71 FR 42928, 7/28/06.......... 040 ``cathode ray tube''
definition; 040 ``CRT
collector'' definition;
040 ``CRT glass
manufacturer''
definition; 040 ``CRT
processing''
definition;
071(3)(oo)(i),
071(3)(oo)(ii),
071(3)(oo)(iii),
071(3)(oo)(iv).
[[Page 34677]]
217 2................. NESHAP: Final Standards for 73 FR 18970, 4/8/08........... 670(1), 670(1)(b)(i),
Hazardous Waste Combustors 670(1)(b)(iii),
(Phase I Final Replacement 670(1)(b)(v).
Standards and Phase II)
Amendments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regulatory Checklist is a document that addresses specific changes made to the Federal regulations by one or
more related final rules published in the Federal Register. EPA develops these checklists as tools to assist
States in developing their authorization application and in documenting specific State regulations analogous
to the Federal regulations. For more information on EPA's RCRA State Authorization Guidance see https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/osw/laws-regs/State/index.htm.
\2\ State rule contains more stringent provisions. For identification of the more stringent State provisions
refer to the Docket ID Number EPA-R10-RCRA-2010-0251 for this proposed rule.
Table 2--State Initiated Changes
------------------------------------------------------------------------
State citation--Washington's
administrative code (WAC) Reason for change Analogous federal 40
(WAC 173-303-* * *) CFR citation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
030......................... Clarification--Add 260 related.
acronyms (PODC,
DRE, APTI, MACT,
TEQ, CAMU, TU).
040......................... Clarify definition 262.10.
for Closure--update
to clarify closure
applies to
recyclers, some
generators and some
transporters.
040......................... Compliance 260 related.
Procedure--removed
the cited dates and
added RCW title.
040......................... Person definition-- 260.10.
Updated to match
Federal rule.
040......................... Staging Pile 260.10.
definition--Updated
to match Federal
rule.
040......................... Surface Impoundment 260.10.
definition--Change
language to reflect
Federal definition
by deleting the
word ``dangerous''.
045......................... Incorporation by 260-280 related.
reference updated
to July 2007.
070(7)(c)................... Clarify that 261/5(c) Intro.
counting exclusion
applies to permit-
by-rule (PBR), not
to treatment by
generator activity.
07
