Analysis by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets on the Long-Term Availability and Affordability of Insurance for Terrorism Risk, 34530-34533 [2010-14639]
Download as PDF
34530
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2010 / Notices
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. You may also
send comments electronically via the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/
smses.dot.gov/submit/. All comments
will become part of this docket and will
be available for inspection and copying
at the above address between 10 a.m.
and 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through
Friday, except federal holidays. An
electronic version of this document and
all documents entered into this docket
is available on the World Wide Web at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joann Spittle, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Maritime
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W21–203,
Washington, DC 20590. Telephone 202–
366–5979.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
described by the applicant the intended
service of the vessel CEST LA VIE is:
Intended Commercial Use of Vessel:
‘‘Vessel Chartering Operations.’’
Geographic Region: ‘‘Intended
operations will be the west coast of the
U.S. California, Oregon, and
Washington.’’
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Dated: June 11, 2010.
Julie P. Agarwal,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–14688 Filed 6–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. FD 35371]
Nittany & Bald Eagle Railroad
Company—Temporary Trackage
Rights Exemption—Norfolk Southern
Railway Company
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
(NSR), pursuant to a written trackage
rights agreement dated April 13, 2010,
has agreed to grant nonexclusive
overhead temporary trackage rights to
Nittany & Bald Eagle Railroad Company
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jun 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
(N&BE), between Lock Haven and
Driftwood, Pa., from milepost BR 194.2
to milepost BR 139.2, a distance of
approximately 55 miles.1
The transaction may be consummated
on or after July 1, 2010, and the
temporary trackage rights are scheduled
to expire on December 15, 2010. The
purpose of the temporary trackage rights
is to allow N&BE adequate bridge train
service for temporary, seasonal traffic
originating on the N&BE for delivery to
an off-line destination.
As a condition to this exemption, any
employees affected by the acquisition of
the temporary trackage rights will be
protected by the conditions imposed in
Norfolk and Western Railway—
Trackage Rights—Burlington Northern,
Inc., 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as modified
in Mendocino Coast Railway—Lease
and Operate—California Western
Railroad, 360 I.C.C. 653 (1980), and any
employees affected by the
discontinuance of those trackage rights
will be protected by the conditions set
out in Oregon Short Line Railroad and
The Union Pacific Railroad Company—
Abandonment—Portion Goshen Branch
Between Firth and Ammon, in Bingham
and Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360
I.C.C. 91 (1979).
This notice is filed under 49 CFR
1180.2(d)(8). If it contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
Petitions for stay must be filed no later
than June 24, 2010 (at least 7 days
before the exemption becomes
effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
35371, must be filed with the Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Richard R. Wilson, 518 N.
Center Street, Suite 1, Ebensburg, PA
15931.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at ‘‘https://
www.stb.dot.gov.’’
Decided: June 14, 2010.
1 A redacted, executed trackage rights agreement
between NSR and N&BE was filed with the notice
of exemption. The unredacted version was
concurrently filed under seal along with a motion
for protective order, which will be addressed in a
separate decision.
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010–14664 Filed 6–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Analysis by the President’s Working
Group on Financial Markets on the
Long-Term Availability and
Affordability of Insurance for Terrorism
Risk
AGENCY: Departmental Offices,
Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Terrorism Risk Insurance
Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–297, 116 Stat.
2322), as amended by the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization
Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–160, 121 Stat.
1839), requires the President’s Working
Group on Financial Markets to perform
an on-going analysis regarding the longterm availability and affordability of
insurance for terrorism risk.
The President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets (established by
Executive Order 12631) is comprised of
the Secretary of the Treasury, the
Chairman of the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System, the
Chairman of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and the
Chairman of the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (or their
designees). The Secretary of the
Treasury, or his designee, is the
Chairman of the President’s Working
Group on Financial Markets. As chair of
the President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets, Treasury is issuing
this Notice for public comment to assist
the President’s Working Group with its
analysis.
DATES: Comments must be in writing
and received by August 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments
electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov, or by mail (if hard
copy, preferably an original and two
copies) to Treasury’s Office of Financial
Institutions Policy, Attention:
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets Public Comment Record, Room
1417 MT, Department of the Treasury,
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20220. Because postal
mail may be subject to processing delay,
it is recommended that comments be
submitted electronically. All comments
should be captioned with ‘‘President’s
Working Group on Financial Markets:
Terrorism Risk Insurance Analysis.’’
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2010 / Notices
Please include your name, affiliation,
address, e-mail address and telephone
number(s) in your comment. Where
appropriate, comments should include a
short Executive Summary (no more than
five single-spaced pages).
In general, comments received will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov
without change, including any business
or personal information provided.
Comments received, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, are part of the public record
and subject to public disclosure. Do not
enclose any information in your
comment or supporting materials that
you consider confidential or
inappropriate for public disclosure. In
addition, all comments received will be
available for public inspection by
appointment at the Reading Room of the
Treasury Library. To make
appointments, please call the number
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C.
Christopher Ledoux, Acting Director,
Office of Financial Institutions Policy,
202–622–2730 (not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107–297, 116 Stat. 2322)
(hereinafter referenced as ‘‘TRIA’’) was
enacted on November 26, 2002. TRIA’s
purposes are to address market
disruptions, to ensure the continued
widespread availability and
affordability of commercial property
and casualty insurance for terrorism
risk, and to allow for a transition period
for the private markets to stabilize and
build capacity while preserving State
insurance regulation and consumer
protections. Title I of TRIA established
a temporary Federal program of shared
public and private compensation for
insured commercial property and
casualty losses resulting from an act of
terrorism, as defined in the Act. TRIA
authorized Treasury to administer and
implement the Terrorism Risk Insurance
Program (hereinafter referenced as the
‘‘Program’’), including the issuance of
regulations and procedures.
As originally enacted, the Program
was to end on December 31, 2005;
however, on December 22, 2005, the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act
of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–144, 119 Stat.
2660) was enacted, which extended the
Program through December 31, 2007. On
December 26, 2007, the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program Reauthorization Act
of 2007 (Pub. L. 110–160, 121 Stat.
1839) was enacted, which extended the
Program through December 31, 2014.
Section 108(e) of TRIA, as amended
by the Terrorism Risk Insurance
Extension Act of 2005, required the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jun 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets to perform an analysis and
report to Congress regarding the longterm availability and affordability of
insurance for terrorism risk, including
group life coverage and coverage for
chemical, nuclear, biological, and
radiological events.
In September 2006, the President’s
Working Group on Financial Markets
submitted a report to Congress on
Terrorism Risk Insurance. That report
can be accessed at https://www.treas.gov/
offices/domestic-finance/
financial-institution/
terrorism-insurance/pdf/report.pdf. The
report found that the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance
had improved since the terrorist attacks
of September 11, 2001, including that
pricing for terrorism risk insurance had
fallen and take-up (purchase) rates had
risen. The improvement was due to
several factors including better risk
measurement and management,
improved modeling of terrorism risk,
increased reinsurance capacity, and the
financial condition of property and
casualty insurers. Still, the report also
found that a significant number of
policyholders were not purchasing
coverage at that time. The report found
that group life insurance (which is not
included in the Program) remained
generally available, that prices had
declined, and that there had been
improvements in the availability of
catastrophic life reinsurance. The report
concluded that there appeared to be
little potential for future market
development of terrorism risk insurance
for losses associated with chemical,
nuclear, biological, and radiological
attacks.
In addition to extending the Program
through 2014, the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program Reauthorization Act
of 2007 amended Section 108 of TRIA
to require an on-going analysis by the
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets regarding the long-term
availability and affordability of
insurance for terrorism risk generally.
The President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets is required to submit
a report to Congress in 2010 (and
another report again, in 2013). The
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets is to conduct its analysis in
consultation with the National
Association of Insurance
Commissioners, representatives of the
insurance industry, representatives of
the securities industry, and
representatives of policyholders. This
Notice seeks comment from these and
any other interested parties as a means
of satisfying the consultation
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34531
requirement in the most open and
efficient manner.
I. General Solicitation for Comments
About the Long-Term Availability and
Affordability of Terrorism Risk
Insurance
Please comment generally; and please
include data and other information in
support of such comments, where
appropriate and available, regarding the
long-term availability and affordability
of insurance for terrorism risk. All
relevant views and comments are
invited.
In addition, please consider providing
comments in response to the following
specific questions:
II. Specific Questions
Key Factors
1. What are the key factors that
determine the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance
coverage? How are these factors being
measured and projected today? What
factors will determine the availability
and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance long-term? The President’s
Working Group on Financial Markets
discussed various factors in its 2006
report, referenced above; how have
these factors changed or developed
since then?
2. What are the key factors that
determine the amount of private-market
insurer and reinsurer capacity made
available for terrorism risk insurance
coverage? How have these factors
changed since 2006, when the
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets issued its last report? How will
such factors evolve in the long-term and
upon what factors will available
capacity most depend?
Economic Factors
3. How, in general, has the state of the
financial markets and economy, and the
financial condition of commercial
property and casualty insurers, affected
the availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance; and how does
that compare with effects on the
availability and affordability of other
lines or types of commercial property
and casualty insurance? Please
comment on potential entry of new
capital into, as well as any exits from,
the terrorism insurance and reinsurance
markets.
Underwriting
4. What changes and improvements
have taken place in the ability of
insurers to measure and manage their
accumulation of terrorism risk
exposures, and how (as well as to what
extent) are primary insurers using
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
34532
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
available methods? Has improved risk
accumulation management led to more
availability? Has there been any
improvement in modeling of frequency
and terrorist behavior? What has been
learned from the near-9 years of
experience in managing and assessing
terrorism risk since September 11, 2001?
Overall, how has modeling improved
and/or continued to develop since 2006,
when the President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets issued its last report?
How is modeling expected to evolve
further in the long-term?
5. What role do mitigation and loss
prevention play in underwriting and
pricing terrorism risk insurance? How
has mitigation developed since 2002,
what improvements have been made
since 2006, to what effect has the
availability of terrorism risk insurance
had on mitigation and vice versa; and,
how will mitigation evolve in the longterm?
6. What is the state of information
sharing between and among the private
and official sectors related to terrorism
risk: (a) How much reliance is placed on
open and private source intelligence; (b)
how has it affected the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance;
and, (c) how will such information
processes further develop and affect the
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance in the longterm?
Coverage
7. What changes and improvements
have taken place with regard to the
types of terrorism risk insurance
coverage available in the market? What
changes and improvements have taken
place since 2006? Have there been
improvements and changes in forms, are
there special terms or conditions? What
is the state of standalone, ‘‘TRIA-only’’
coverage? Is available coverage limited
to, or broader than that required to be
made available under TRIA?
8. What are the differences in
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance coverage for
foreign and domestic terrorist acts?
9. Did the Terrorism Risk Insurance
Program Reauthorization Act of 2007’s
amendment to the definition of ‘‘act of
terrorism’’ lead to more availability due
to the requirement that such coverage be
made available, or was such coverage
available prior to 2007; conversely, did
the amendment lead to less coverage
due to the broadened scope of ‘‘act of
terrorism’’ exclusions, or were
exclusions revised to distinguish
between coverage of foreign and
domestic terrorist acts?
10. What are the differences in
availability and affordability of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jun 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
terrorism risk insurance coverage for
losses at U.S. locations, as compared to
such coverage for losses at non-U.S.
locations? What are the differences as
compared between TRIA-covered
locations and non-TRIA locations?
Policyholder Demand
11. How has the demand for terrorism
risk insurance changed since 2006,
when the President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets issued its last report?
Please comment on take-up by
policyholder sector, location, line, and
other relevant characteristics. How have
any changes in demand influenced the
willingness of insurers to allocate
capital to terrorism risk insurance? Has
there been any impact on the amount of
capital allocated to non-terrorism
coverage or among lines of insurance?
12. To what extent have businesses
used captive insurance companies to
provide terrorism risk insurance, and
what is the potential for the use of
captive insurers to insure against such
risk long-term? How have stand-alone
terrorism captives developed, and how
will these evolve long-term, including
after the expiration of the Program in
2014?
13. Have State approaches (such as
those applicable to mandatory coverage,
permitted exclusions, and rate
regulation) made coverage more or less
available and affordable? Have there
been any changes in State insurance
regulation of terrorism risk insurance
since the Terrorism Risk Insurance
Program Reauthorization Act of 2007
was enacted? To what extent has the
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance been influenced
by State insurance regulation, and what
role is State regulation expected to have
long-term? Please comment on Stateapproved terrorism related rate loads.
14. What are the differences in
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance between the
licensed/admitted market and the nonadmitted/surplus lines market, and to
what degree are those differences
attributable to the degree and manner in
which each market is regulated?
Price of Insurance
15. What improvements have taken
place in the ability of insurers to price
terrorism risk insurance? How are rating
organizations assisting insurers in
pricing, and how have rating factors
developed?
16. What have been the trends in
pricing of terrorism risk insurance?
Please comment on the extent to which
such coverage is not priced and
charged-for. How has pricing changed
since 2006, when the President’s
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Working Group on Financial Markets
issued its last report? To what do you
attribute any changes?
17. How has the recent ‘‘soft market’’
impacted the availability of and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance?
What would be the impact on the
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance should the
market ‘‘harden’’ in the near future?
18. How were primary insurers’
pricing decisions affected by the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007,
particularly as to the requirement to
make available coverage for acts of
terrorism being no longer defined as
limited to those committed on behalf of
any foreign person or foreign interest?
Reinsurance
19. What is the current availability
and cost of reinsurance to cover
terrorism risk? Please distinguish by
line or type of insurance being reinsured
and on what basis (treaty or facultative).
How has the terrorism reinsurance
market changed since 2006, when the
President’s Working Group on Financial
Markets issued its last report? To what
do you attribute any changes?
20. At what policyholder retention
levels are insurance programs being
structured by policyholders to cover
terrorism risk (e.g., deductibles, selfinsurance, captives); and, with regard to
insurers, how are reinsurance programs
being structured and at what attachment
points? Please comment on the
availability and affordability of
reinsurance for terrorism risk.
21. Are reinsurers allocating more
capital to terrorism risk insurance, and
has capacity changed since 2006, when
the President’s Working Group on
Financial Markets issued its last report?
Are insurers willing to pay the cost of
terrorism risk reinsurance, and is that a
factor affecting the allocation of capital
to the risk; how much additional capital
could be attracted long-term?
22. How have provisions of the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 affected the
terrorism risk reinsurance market? More
specifically, how has maintaining and
not increasing the insurer deductible
percentage applied against direct earned
premiums (from Program lines), as well
as not decreasing the Federal share of
losses above the insurer deductible,
affected the provision and development
of private reinsurance?
23. To what extent have alternate risk
transfer methods (e.g., catastrophe
bonds or other capital market
instruments) been successfully or
unsuccessfully used for terrorism risk
insurance, and what is the potential for
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 116 / Thursday, June 17, 2010 / Notices
the long-term development of these
approaches?
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES
Losses Associated With Chemical,
Nuclear, Biological, and Radiological
(CNBR) Acts
24. What is the current availability
and affordability of coverage for CNBR
events? For what perils is coverage
available, subject to what limits, and
under what policy terms and
conditions? Is there a difference in the
availability and affordability of coverage
for CNBR events caused by acts of
terrorism? To what extent have various
States allowed insurers to exclude
coverage for CNBR events (Please
comment on requirements for workers’
compensation and fire-following
coverage.)? How have exclusions
developed?
25. Is it the case that some insurers
appear unwilling to provide coverage
for CNBR events caused by acts of
terrorism, despite TRIA limits on an
insurer’s maximum loss exposure? If so,
why?
26. In the long-term, what are the key
factors that will determine the
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance coverage for
CNBR events? The President’s Working
Group on Financial Markets previously
reported that there appeared to be little
potential for market development. Has
anything changed since 2006?
Deductible and Co-Share Levels
27. Under the Program, an insurer’s
annual deductible is a percentage of
certain direct earned premiums (as
defined by TRIA and regulation). TRIA,
as originally enacted, graduated the
percentage applied for each year. The
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 established
a set percentage of 20 percent for each
Program year beginning in 2007. Please
comment for each year since 2006 as to
whether direct earned premiums in
TRIA lines and insurer deductibles have
increased or decreased? If so, in what
amounts? Please provide data as
available.
28. How might any increases to the
insurer deductible level or decreases to
the Federal share above such deductible
levels, prior to the Program’s expiration
in 2014, affect the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance?
Please comment on the degree, amount
or increment of any recommended
increase.
Expiration of the Program
29. Describe efforts undertaken by the
insurance industry and/or policyholders
since 2006, when the President’s
Working Group on Financial Markets
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Jun 16, 2010
Jkt 220001
issued its last report, to ensure the
availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance after 2014 when
the Program expires, and long-term?
30. Please comment on any
anticipated State approaches to ensure
the continued availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance
after the Program expires in 2014 (such
as those approaches taken by the States
after September 11, 2001 and before
TRIA was enacted on November 26,
2002).
31. Please comment on any other
developments in markets that might
affect the continued availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance.
32. In the absence of the Program, in
what forms, at what levels, under what
terms and conditions, and at what price
might terrorism risk insurance be
available; and, at what duration (i.e.,
long-term)? Please distinguish from
State-mandated coverage, such as
workers’ compensation and fire
insurance.
Michael S. Barr,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2010–14639 Filed 6–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
Deposits
AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for comment.
SUMMARY: The proposed information
collection request (ICR) described below
has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. OTS
is soliciting public comments on the
proposal.
DATES: Submit written comments on or
before July 19, 2010. A copy of this ICR,
with applicable supporting
documentation, can be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at https://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain.
ADDRESSES: Send comments, referring to
the collection by title of the proposal or
by OMB approval number, to OMB and
OTS at these addresses: Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for OTS, U.S.
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to
(202) 395–6974; and Information
Collection Comments, Chief Counsel’s
Office, Office of Thrift Supervision,
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
34533
1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC
20552, by fax to (202) 906–6518, or by
e-mail to
infocollection.comments@ots.treas.gov.
OTS will post comments and the related
index on the OTS Internet Site at
www.ots.treas.gov. In addition,
interested persons may inspect
comments at the Public Reading Room,
1700 G Street, NW., by appointment. To
make an appointment, call (202) 906–
5922, send an e-mail to
public.info@ots.treas.gov, or send a
facsimile transmission to (202) 906–
7755.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or to obtain a copy
of the submission to OMB, please
contact Ira L. Mills at
ira.mills@ots.treas.gov, (202) 906–6531,
or facsimile number (202) 906–6518,
Regulations and Legislation Division,
Chief Counsel’s Office, Office of Thrift
Supervision, 1700 G Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20552.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OTS may
not conduct or sponsor an information
collection, and respondents are not
required to respond to an information
collection, unless the information
collection displays a currently valid
OMB control number. As part of the
approval process, we invite comments
on the following information collection.
Title of Proposal: Deposits.
OMB Number: 1550–0093.
Form Number: N/A.
Regulation requirement: 12 CFR Parts
557.20, 230.3, 230.4, 230.5 and 230.6.
Description: Section 557.20 requires
savings associations to establish and
maintain deposit documentation
practices and records. These records
should include adequate evidence of
ownership, balances, and all
transactions involving the account. In
addition, part 557 relies on the
disclosure regulations applicable to
savings associations under Regulation
DD. Regulation DD implements the
Truth in Savings Act, part of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act of 1991.
The regulations assist consumers in
comparing deposit accounts offered by
depository institutions. Consumers
receive disclosures about fees, annual
percentage yield, interest rate, and other
account terms whenever a consumer
requests the information and before the
consumer opens an account. The
regulation also requires that savings
associations provide fees and other
information on any periodic statement
the institution sends to the consumer.
Regulation DD contains rules for
advertisements of deposit accounts and
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 116 (Thursday, June 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34530-34533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14639]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Analysis by the President's Working Group on Financial Markets on
the Long-Term Availability and Affordability of Insurance for Terrorism
Risk
AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-297, 116
Stat. 2322), as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 (Pub. L. 110-160, 121 Stat. 1839), requires
the President's Working Group on Financial Markets to perform an on-
going analysis regarding the long-term availability and affordability
of insurance for terrorism risk.
The President's Working Group on Financial Markets (established by
Executive Order 12631) is comprised of the Secretary of the Treasury,
the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System,
the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the
Chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (or their
designees). The Secretary of the Treasury, or his designee, is the
Chairman of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets. As
chair of the President's Working Group on Financial Markets, Treasury
is issuing this Notice for public comment to assist the President's
Working Group with its analysis.
DATES: Comments must be in writing and received by August 2, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please submit comments electronically through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov, or by mail (if hard
copy, preferably an original and two copies) to Treasury's Office of
Financial Institutions Policy, Attention: President's Working Group on
Financial Markets Public Comment Record, Room 1417 MT, Department of
the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
Because postal mail may be subject to processing delay, it is
recommended that comments be submitted electronically. All comments
should be captioned with ``President's Working Group on Financial
Markets: Terrorism Risk Insurance Analysis.''
[[Page 34531]]
Please include your name, affiliation, address, e-mail address and
telephone number(s) in your comment. Where appropriate, comments should
include a short Executive Summary (no more than five single-spaced
pages).
In general, comments received will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov without change, including any business or personal
information provided. Comments received, including attachments and
other supporting materials, are part of the public record and subject
to public disclosure. Do not enclose any information in your comment or
supporting materials that you consider confidential or inappropriate
for public disclosure. In addition, all comments received will be
available for public inspection by appointment at the Reading Room of
the Treasury Library. To make appointments, please call the number
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Christopher Ledoux, Acting
Director, Office of Financial Institutions Policy, 202-622-2730 (not a
toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107-297, 116 Stat. 2322) (hereinafter referenced as ``TRIA'')
was enacted on November 26, 2002. TRIA's purposes are to address market
disruptions, to ensure the continued widespread availability and
affordability of commercial property and casualty insurance for
terrorism risk, and to allow for a transition period for the private
markets to stabilize and build capacity while preserving State
insurance regulation and consumer protections. Title I of TRIA
established a temporary Federal program of shared public and private
compensation for insured commercial property and casualty losses
resulting from an act of terrorism, as defined in the Act. TRIA
authorized Treasury to administer and implement the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Program (hereinafter referenced as the ``Program''),
including the issuance of regulations and procedures.
As originally enacted, the Program was to end on December 31, 2005;
however, on December 22, 2005, the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109-144, 119 Stat. 2660) was enacted, which
extended the Program through December 31, 2007. On December 26, 2007,
the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 (Pub.
L. 110-160, 121 Stat. 1839) was enacted, which extended the Program
through December 31, 2014.
Section 108(e) of TRIA, as amended by the Terrorism Risk Insurance
Extension Act of 2005, required the President's Working Group on
Financial Markets to perform an analysis and report to Congress
regarding the long-term availability and affordability of insurance for
terrorism risk, including group life coverage and coverage for
chemical, nuclear, biological, and radiological events.
In September 2006, the President's Working Group on Financial
Markets submitted a report to Congress on Terrorism Risk Insurance.
That report can be accessed at https://www.treas.gov/offices/domestic-finance/financial-institution/terrorism-insurance/pdf/report.pdf. The
report found that the availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance had improved since the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001, including that pricing for terrorism risk insurance had fallen
and take-up (purchase) rates had risen. The improvement was due to
several factors including better risk measurement and management,
improved modeling of terrorism risk, increased reinsurance capacity,
and the financial condition of property and casualty insurers. Still,
the report also found that a significant number of policyholders were
not purchasing coverage at that time. The report found that group life
insurance (which is not included in the Program) remained generally
available, that prices had declined, and that there had been
improvements in the availability of catastrophic life reinsurance. The
report concluded that there appeared to be little potential for future
market development of terrorism risk insurance for losses associated
with chemical, nuclear, biological, and radiological attacks.
In addition to extending the Program through 2014, the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 amended Section 108
of TRIA to require an on-going analysis by the President's Working
Group on Financial Markets regarding the long-term availability and
affordability of insurance for terrorism risk generally. The
President's Working Group on Financial Markets is required to submit a
report to Congress in 2010 (and another report again, in 2013). The
President's Working Group on Financial Markets is to conduct its
analysis in consultation with the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners, representatives of the insurance industry,
representatives of the securities industry, and representatives of
policyholders. This Notice seeks comment from these and any other
interested parties as a means of satisfying the consultation
requirement in the most open and efficient manner.
I. General Solicitation for Comments About the Long-Term Availability
and Affordability of Terrorism Risk Insurance
Please comment generally; and please include data and other
information in support of such comments, where appropriate and
available, regarding the long-term availability and affordability of
insurance for terrorism risk. All relevant views and comments are
invited.
In addition, please consider providing comments in response to the
following specific questions:
II. Specific Questions
Key Factors
1. What are the key factors that determine the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance coverage? How are these
factors being measured and projected today? What factors will determine
the availability and affordability of terrorism risk insurance long-
term? The President's Working Group on Financial Markets discussed
various factors in its 2006 report, referenced above; how have these
factors changed or developed since then?
2. What are the key factors that determine the amount of private-
market insurer and reinsurer capacity made available for terrorism risk
insurance coverage? How have these factors changed since 2006, when the
President's Working Group on Financial Markets issued its last report?
How will such factors evolve in the long-term and upon what factors
will available capacity most depend?
Economic Factors
3. How, in general, has the state of the financial markets and
economy, and the financial condition of commercial property and
casualty insurers, affected the availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance; and how does that compare with effects on the
availability and affordability of other lines or types of commercial
property and casualty insurance? Please comment on potential entry of
new capital into, as well as any exits from, the terrorism insurance
and reinsurance markets.
Underwriting
4. What changes and improvements have taken place in the ability of
insurers to measure and manage their accumulation of terrorism risk
exposures, and how (as well as to what extent) are primary insurers
using
[[Page 34532]]
available methods? Has improved risk accumulation management led to
more availability? Has there been any improvement in modeling of
frequency and terrorist behavior? What has been learned from the near-9
years of experience in managing and assessing terrorism risk since
September 11, 2001? Overall, how has modeling improved and/or continued
to develop since 2006, when the President's Working Group on Financial
Markets issued its last report? How is modeling expected to evolve
further in the long-term?
5. What role do mitigation and loss prevention play in underwriting
and pricing terrorism risk insurance? How has mitigation developed
since 2002, what improvements have been made since 2006, to what effect
has the availability of terrorism risk insurance had on mitigation and
vice versa; and, how will mitigation evolve in the long-term?
6. What is the state of information sharing between and among the
private and official sectors related to terrorism risk: (a) How much
reliance is placed on open and private source intelligence; (b) how has
it affected the availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance; and, (c) how will such information processes further develop
and affect the availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance in the long-term?
Coverage
7. What changes and improvements have taken place with regard to
the types of terrorism risk insurance coverage available in the market?
What changes and improvements have taken place since 2006? Have there
been improvements and changes in forms, are there special terms or
conditions? What is the state of standalone, ``TRIA-only'' coverage? Is
available coverage limited to, or broader than that required to be made
available under TRIA?
8. What are the differences in availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance coverage for foreign and domestic terrorist
acts?
9. Did the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of
2007's amendment to the definition of ``act of terrorism'' lead to more
availability due to the requirement that such coverage be made
available, or was such coverage available prior to 2007; conversely,
did the amendment lead to less coverage due to the broadened scope of
``act of terrorism'' exclusions, or were exclusions revised to
distinguish between coverage of foreign and domestic terrorist acts?
10. What are the differences in availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance coverage for losses at U.S. locations, as
compared to such coverage for losses at non-U.S. locations? What are
the differences as compared between TRIA-covered locations and non-TRIA
locations?
Policyholder Demand
11. How has the demand for terrorism risk insurance changed since
2006, when the President's Working Group on Financial Markets issued
its last report? Please comment on take-up by policyholder sector,
location, line, and other relevant characteristics. How have any
changes in demand influenced the willingness of insurers to allocate
capital to terrorism risk insurance? Has there been any impact on the
amount of capital allocated to non-terrorism coverage or among lines of
insurance?
12. To what extent have businesses used captive insurance companies
to provide terrorism risk insurance, and what is the potential for the
use of captive insurers to insure against such risk long-term? How have
stand-alone terrorism captives developed, and how will these evolve
long-term, including after the expiration of the Program in 2014?
13. Have State approaches (such as those applicable to mandatory
coverage, permitted exclusions, and rate regulation) made coverage more
or less available and affordable? Have there been any changes in State
insurance regulation of terrorism risk insurance since the Terrorism
Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007 was enacted? To what
extent has the availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance been influenced by State insurance regulation, and what role
is State regulation expected to have long-term? Please comment on
State-approved terrorism related rate loads.
14. What are the differences in availability and affordability of
terrorism risk insurance between the licensed/admitted market and the
non-admitted/surplus lines market, and to what degree are those
differences attributable to the degree and manner in which each market
is regulated?
Price of Insurance
15. What improvements have taken place in the ability of insurers
to price terrorism risk insurance? How are rating organizations
assisting insurers in pricing, and how have rating factors developed?
16. What have been the trends in pricing of terrorism risk
insurance? Please comment on the extent to which such coverage is not
priced and charged-for. How has pricing changed since 2006, when the
President's Working Group on Financial Markets issued its last report?
To what do you attribute any changes?
17. How has the recent ``soft market'' impacted the availability of
and affordability of terrorism risk insurance? What would be the impact
on the availability and affordability of terrorism risk insurance
should the market ``harden'' in the near future?
18. How were primary insurers' pricing decisions affected by the
Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007,
particularly as to the requirement to make available coverage for acts
of terrorism being no longer defined as limited to those committed on
behalf of any foreign person or foreign interest?
Reinsurance
19. What is the current availability and cost of reinsurance to
cover terrorism risk? Please distinguish by line or type of insurance
being reinsured and on what basis (treaty or facultative). How has the
terrorism reinsurance market changed since 2006, when the President's
Working Group on Financial Markets issued its last report? To what do
you attribute any changes?
20. At what policyholder retention levels are insurance programs
being structured by policyholders to cover terrorism risk (e.g.,
deductibles, self-insurance, captives); and, with regard to insurers,
how are reinsurance programs being structured and at what attachment
points? Please comment on the availability and affordability of
reinsurance for terrorism risk.
21. Are reinsurers allocating more capital to terrorism risk
insurance, and has capacity changed since 2006, when the President's
Working Group on Financial Markets issued its last report? Are insurers
willing to pay the cost of terrorism risk reinsurance, and is that a
factor affecting the allocation of capital to the risk; how much
additional capital could be attracted long-term?
22. How have provisions of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 affected the terrorism risk reinsurance
market? More specifically, how has maintaining and not increasing the
insurer deductible percentage applied against direct earned premiums
(from Program lines), as well as not decreasing the Federal share of
losses above the insurer deductible, affected the provision and
development of private reinsurance?
23. To what extent have alternate risk transfer methods (e.g.,
catastrophe bonds or other capital market instruments) been
successfully or unsuccessfully used for terrorism risk insurance, and
what is the potential for
[[Page 34533]]
the long-term development of these approaches?
Losses Associated With Chemical, Nuclear, Biological, and Radiological
(CNBR) Acts
24. What is the current availability and affordability of coverage
for CNBR events? For what perils is coverage available, subject to what
limits, and under what policy terms and conditions? Is there a
difference in the availability and affordability of coverage for CNBR
events caused by acts of terrorism? To what extent have various States
allowed insurers to exclude coverage for CNBR events (Please comment on
requirements for workers' compensation and fire-following coverage.)?
How have exclusions developed?
25. Is it the case that some insurers appear unwilling to provide
coverage for CNBR events caused by acts of terrorism, despite TRIA
limits on an insurer's maximum loss exposure? If so, why?
26. In the long-term, what are the key factors that will determine
the availability and affordability of terrorism risk insurance coverage
for CNBR events? The President's Working Group on Financial Markets
previously reported that there appeared to be little potential for
market development. Has anything changed since 2006?
Deductible and Co-Share Levels
27. Under the Program, an insurer's annual deductible is a
percentage of certain direct earned premiums (as defined by TRIA and
regulation). TRIA, as originally enacted, graduated the percentage
applied for each year. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program
Reauthorization Act of 2007 established a set percentage of 20 percent
for each Program year beginning in 2007. Please comment for each year
since 2006 as to whether direct earned premiums in TRIA lines and
insurer deductibles have increased or decreased? If so, in what
amounts? Please provide data as available.
28. How might any increases to the insurer deductible level or
decreases to the Federal share above such deductible levels, prior to
the Program's expiration in 2014, affect the availability and
affordability of terrorism risk insurance? Please comment on the
degree, amount or increment of any recommended increase.
Expiration of the Program
29. Describe efforts undertaken by the insurance industry and/or
policyholders since 2006, when the President's Working Group on
Financial Markets issued its last report, to ensure the availability
and affordability of terrorism risk insurance after 2014 when the
Program expires, and long-term?
30. Please comment on any anticipated State approaches to ensure
the continued availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance after the Program expires in 2014 (such as those approaches
taken by the States after September 11, 2001 and before TRIA was
enacted on November 26, 2002).
31. Please comment on any other developments in markets that might
affect the continued availability and affordability of terrorism risk
insurance.
32. In the absence of the Program, in what forms, at what levels,
under what terms and conditions, and at what price might terrorism risk
insurance be available; and, at what duration (i.e., long-term)? Please
distinguish from State-mandated coverage, such as workers' compensation
and fire insurance.
Michael S. Barr,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2010-14639 Filed 6-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P