Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Community Development Program Process, 34088-34092 [2010-14550]
Download as PDF
34088
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
observed foraging on Hylaeus host
plants such as Scaevola spp. and
Sesbania tomentosa. However, the
petitioner does not present information
indicating that Hawaiian Hylaeus
populations have declined because of
competition with European honey bees
for nectar and pollen (Magnacca 2007,
p. 188). The petitioner asserts that
populations of the European honey bee
are not as vulnerable to predation by
nonnative ant species as are Hylaeus
bees (see Factor C above). The petitioner
refers to a study by Lach (2008, p. 155),
who observed that although Hylaeus
bees that regularly collect pollen from
the flowers of Metrosideros polymorpha
trees were entirely absent from trees
whose flowers had been visited by the
big-headed ant, visits by the European
honey bee were not affected by bigheaded ant presence.
As described by the petitioner, other
nonnative bees found in areas of native
vegetation include Ceratina species
(carpenter bees), Hylaeus albonitens
(Australian colletid bees), and
Lasioglossum impavidum (no common
name) (Magnacca 2007, p. 188). The
petitioner suggests that these nonnative
bees may impact native Hylaeus bees
such as H. facilis through competition
for pollen, based on their similar size
and flower preferences. However, the
petitioner acknowledges that the impact
of these species on native Hylaeus bees
has not been studied (Magnacca 2007, p.
188). The petitioner also suggests that
parasitoid wasps may compete for
nectar with native Hylaeus species (Daly
and Magnacca 2003, p. 10), but did not
present supporting information in this
regard. No information on the potential
threat to the species from parasitoid
wasps is available in our files.
Summary of Factor E
In summary, the petitions provided
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned actions may be warranted
due to other factors affecting the
species’ continued existence. The
petitioner did not present information,
nor is information available in our files,
indicating that competition from
parasitoid wasps or other nonnative
bees, such as Ceratina species, Hylaeus
albonitens, and Lasioglossum
impavidum, presents a threat to the
petitioned species. However, the
petitions do present information
indicating that Hylaeus anthracinus, H.
assimulans, H. facilis, H. hilaris, H.
kuakea, H. longiceps, and H. mana may
be threatened because of their very
small populations and low genetic
variability, which may make them
vulnerable to habitat change and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
stochastic events such as droughts. Each
of the petitions characterizes the
population status of the petitioned
species as ‘‘small and isolated’’ or
‘‘extremely rare, very small
populations,’’ and we do not have any
contrary information in our files. The
petitioner also presents information
indicating that competition with the
European honey bee may present a
threat to the seven Hylaeus bee species.
We, therefore, conclude that the petition
presents substantial scientific
information indicating that other natural
or manmade factors affecting the
species’ continued existence may
threaten Hylaeus anthracinus, H.
assimulans, H. facilis, H. hilaris, H.
kuakea, H. longiceps, and H. mana.
These factors include the species’ small
numbers of populations and individuals
and competition with nonnative
European honey bees.
Finding
We have reviewed the petitions,
supporting information provided by the
petitioner, and information in our files,
and we evaluated that information to
determine whether the sources cited
support the claims made in the
petitions. On the basis of our evaluation
of the petition under section 4(b)(3)(A)
of the Act, we have determined that the
petition presents substantial scientific
or commercial information indicating
that listing the seven Hylaeus bees as
threatened or endangered may be
warranted. This finding is based on
information that indicates these species’
continued existence may be affected by
destruction or modification of their
coastal strand and lowland forest and
shrubland habitat from urbanization and
land conversion, nonnative plants,
nonnative ungulates, fire, recreational
activities (Factor A); predation by
nonnative ants and the western
yellowjacket wasp (Factor C);
inadequate protection from threats by
existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor
D); and other natural or manmade
factors such as small population size,
and competition with the European
honey bee (Factor E). The petitioner
does not present substantial information
that these seven Hylaeus bees are
threatened by overcollection (Factor B)
currently or in the future.
Because we have found that the
petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing the
seven Hylaeus bee species may be
warranted, we are initiating status
reviews to determine whether listing
these seven species under the Act is
warranted. At the conclusion of the
status reviews we will issue 12–month
findings, in accordance with section
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to whether or
not the Service believes a proposal to
list Hylaeus anthracinus, H. assimulans,
H. facilis, H. hilaris, H. kuakea, H.
longiceps, and H. mana is warranted.
The ‘‘substantial information’’
standard for a 90–day finding differs
from the Act’s ‘‘best scientific and
commercial data’’ standard that applies
to a status review to determine whether
a petitioned action is warranted. A 90–
day finding does not constitute a status
review under the Act. In a 12–month
finding, we will determine whether a
petitioned action is warranted after we
have completed a thorough status
review of the species, which is
conducted following a substantial 90–
day finding. Because the Act’s standards
for 90–day and 12–month findings are
different, as described above, a
substantial 90–day finding does not
mean that the 12–month finding will
determine that listing is warranted.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.govand upon
request from the Pacific Islands Fish
and Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Author
The primary authors of this notice are
the staff of the Pacific Islands Fish and
Wildlife Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: June 3, 2010.
Daniel M. Ashe,
Acting Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–14430 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 0907211157–0224–02]
RIN 0648–AX76
Fisheries in the Western Pacific;
Community Development Program
Process
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
establish requirements and procedures
for soliciting, reviewing, and approving
community development plans for
access to western Pacific fisheries. The
intent of this proposed rule is to
promote the participation of island
communities in fisheries that they have
traditionally depended upon, but may
not have the capabilities to support
continued and substantial participation
in, possibly due to economic,
regulatory, or other constraints.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by July 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed
rule, identified by 0648–AX76, may be
sent to either of the following addresses:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal
www.regulations.gov; or
• Mail: Mail written comments to
Michael D. Tosatto, Acting Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands
Region (PIR), 1601 Kapiolani Blvd.,
Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814–4700.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted to one of the above two
addresses to ensure that the comments
are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent to
any other address or individual, or
received after the end of the comment
period, may not be considered. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.)
submitted voluntarily by the sender may
be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF file formats only.
The Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council)
prepared amendments to the fishery
ecosystem plans (FEP) for American
Samoa, Hawaii, Marianas, and western
Pacific Pelagics. These amendments
contain background information on the
issue. The amendments and proposed
regulations, which are identical for all
FEPs, are available from
www.regulations.gov, and from the
Council, 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400,
Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220,
fax 808–522–8226, www.wpcouncil.org.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to Michael D.
Tosatto (see ADDRESSES) and by e-mail
to DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to 202–395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIR, Sustainable
Fisheries, 808–944–2108.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document is also accessible at
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Section 305(i)(2) of the MagnusonStevens Act authorizes the Council and
the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary),
through NMFS, to establish a western
Pacific community development
program for any fishery under the
authority of the Council and NMFS. The
intent of the program is to provide
western Pacific communities access to
fisheries that they have traditionally
depended upon, but may not have the
capabilities to support continued and
substantial participation in, possibly
due to economic, regulatory, or other
barriers.
In 2002, NMFS published the
eligibility criteria for participating in the
western Pacific community
development program (67 FR 18512;
April 16, 2002), but did not establish a
mechanism to solicit and review
development plans under the program.
To address this issue, the Council
developed and submitted to NMFS for
review, amendments to the American
Samoa, Hawaii, Marianas, and western
Pacific Pelagic FEPs to establish this
mechanism. The amendments are
identical for each FEP.
This proposed rule would codify the
eligibility criteria, as previously
published (67 FR 18512; April 16,
2002), for participating in the program.
To be eligible, a community must:
1. Be located in American Samoa,
Guam, Hawaii, or the Northern Mariana
Islands (collectively, the western
Pacific);
2. Consist of community residents
descended from aboriginal people
indigenous to the western Pacific area
who conducted commercial or
subsistence fishing using traditional
fishing practices in the waters of the
western Pacific;
3. Consist of individuals who reside
in their ancestral homeland;
4. Have knowledge of customary
practices relevant to fisheries of the
western Pacific;
5. Have a traditional dependence on
fisheries of the western Pacific;
6. Are experiencing economic or other
barriers or constraints that prevent full
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34089
participation in the western Pacific
fisheries and, in recent years, have not
had harvesting, processing or marketing
capability sufficient to support
substantial participation in fisheries in
the area; and
7. Develop and submit a community
development plan to the Council and
NMFS.
This proposed rule would require a
community development plan to
contain:
1. A statement of the purpose and
goals of the plan;
2. A description of, and justification
for, the proposed fishing activity;
3. The location of the proposed
fishing activity;
4. The species to be harvested,
directly and incidentally;
5. The gear type(s) to be used;
6. The frequency and duration of the
proposed fishing activity; and
7. A statement describing the degree
of involvement by the indigenous
community members including the
name, address, telephone and other
contact information of each person who
would conduct the proposed fishing
activity, and a description of how the
community and or its members meet
each of the eligibility criteria.
If a vessel is to be used by the
community to conduct fishing activities,
the community development plan must
include the vessel name and official
number (USCG documentation, state,
territory, or other registration number),
length, displacement, fish holding
capacity, any valid federal fishing
permit number, and the name and
contact information of the owner(s) and
operator(s).
The proposed rule would require the
Council to review each plan to ensure
that it meets the intent of Section
305(i)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
and contains all required information. If
the Council finds that these
requirements are met, the Council
would then forward the plan to the
NMFS Regional Administrator for
review.
This proposed rule would require the
Regional Administrator to review each
plan to ensure the plan is consistent
with the FEPs, the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable laws. NMFS
would then publish a notice in the
Federal Register to solicit public
comment on the community
development plan and any associated
environmental review documents.
Within 90 days after the close of the
public comment period for the plan, the
Regional Administrator would be
required to notify the applicant in
writing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the plan. If the plan is
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
34090
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
approved, the NMFS Regional
Administrator would publish a notice in
the Federal Register describing the
plan’s authorized activities. The
Regional Administrator may attach
limiting terms and conditions to the
authorization to ensure proper
management and monitoring of the
fishing activity, including, but not
limited to, catch and trip limits, times
and places where fishing may or may
not be conducted, vessel monitoring
system, observers, and/or reporting
requirements.
To be considered, comments on this
proposed rule must be received by July
20, 2010, not postmarked or otherwise
transmitted by that date.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, the NMFS
Assistant Administrator has determined
that this proposed rule is consistent
with the fishery ecosystem plans for
American Samoa, Hawaii, the Marianas,
and western Pacific pelagic fisheries,
other provisions of the MagnusonStevens Act, and other applicable laws,
subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The analysis follows:
The Council has proposed to amend the
FEPs for American Samoa, Hawaii, Marianas,
and western Pacific pelagics to establish a
process to solicit, review, and implement
community development plans submitted by
eligible western Pacific communities. The
Council and NMFS would review each plan
and, if it meets all requirements, NMFS
would authorize the plan. The proposed
action is intended to promote participation in
fisheries that communities have traditionally
depended upon, but may not have
capabilities to support continued and
substantial participation in, possibly due to
economic, regulatory, or other constraints. A
description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the legal basis for this action
are contained in the preamble to this
proposed rule. This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with other
Federal rules. The proposed rule would only
establish a procedure for the solicitation,
review, and implementation of plans under
the western Pacific community development
program. This procedure is not expected to
result in any significant economic impact on
any western Pacific community. If
subsequent rulemaking to implement
approved plans directly impacts the
economic profitability, or proxy thereof, of a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
community with an approved community
development plan, NMFS will prepare an
IRFA for that specific action.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a new
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval.
Public reporting burden for
developing and submitting a
development plan is estimated to
average six hours per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding
whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility,
the accuracy of the burden estimate,
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected, and
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Send comments on these or
any other aspects of the collection of
information to Michael D. Tosatto (see
ADDRESSES), and by email to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax
to 202–395–7285.
Because approved plans may be
subject to additional conditions, this
proposed rule also contains collectionof-information requirements subject to
the PRA that have been previously
approved by OMB. NMFS estimates that
it may receive and process up to five (5)
community development plan proposals
each year. Therefore, the additional
estimated burden on western Pacific
community development plan
respondents would not exceed the
currently-approved burden estimates for
the existing PRA collections listed
below:
(1) Approved under 0648–0214,
0648–0577, 0648–0584, 0648–0586, and
0649–0589. (a) PIR logbook family of
forms estimated at 5 minutes (min) per
reporting action; (b) pre-trip and postlanding notifications estimated at 5 min
per reporting action; (c) experimental
fishing reports estimated at 4 hours (hr)
per reporting action; (d) sales and
transshipment reports estimated at 5
min per reporting action; (e) report on
gear left at sea estimated at 5 min per
reporting action; (f) claims for
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
reimbursement for lost fishing time
estimated at 4 hr per claim; (g) request
for pelagics area closure exemption
estimated at 1 hr per request; and (h)
observer placement meetings estimated
at 1 hr per reporting action. (§§ 665.14,
665.17, 665.105, 665.144, 665.145,
665.205, 665.207, 665.244, 665.247,
665.407, 665.444, 665.445, 665.606,
665.644, 665.645, 665.803, and
665.808.)
(2) Approved under 0648–0360,
0648–0361, 0648–0584, 0648–0586, and
0648–0589. PIR gear marking and vessel
identification (a) estimated at 45 min to
1 hr 15 min per vessel for vessel
identification, and (b) estimated at 2
min for each gear marking. (§§ 665.16,
665.128, 665.228, 665.246, 665.428,
665.628, and 665.804.)
(3) Approved under 0648–0441,
0648–0519, and 0648–0584. PIR vessel
monitoring system (a) installation,
estimated at 4 hr per reporting action;
(b) repair and maintenance, estimated at
2 hr per reporting action; and (c) hourly
automated position reports, estimated at
24 sec per day. (§ 665.19.)
(4) Approved under 0648–0456. PIR
seabird interaction reporting (a) at-sea
notification, estimated at 1 hr per
reporting action; (b) reporting on
recovery data form, estimated at 1 hr per
reporting action; and (c) specimen
tagging, estimated at 30 min per
reporting action. (§ 665.815.)
(5) Approved under 0648–0462. PIR
coral reef logbook reporting (a) at-sea
notification, estimated at 3 min per
reporting action; (b) logbook reporting,
estimated at 30 min hr per reporting
action; and (c) transshipment reports,
estimated at 15 min per reporting
action. (§§ 665.14, 665.126, 665.226, and
665.426.)
(6) Approved under 0648–0463. PIR
coral reef special permit (a) application,
estimated at 2 hr per application; and
(b) special permit appeals, estimated at
3 hr per appeal. (§§ 665.124, 665.224,
665.424, and 665.624.)
(7) Approved under 0648–0490,
0648–0577, 0648–0584, 0648–0586, and
0649–0589: (a) PIR permit family of
forms estimated at 30 min hr per permit
action; (b) experimental fishing permits,
estimated at 2 hr per application; and (c)
appeals from permit actions estimated at
2 hr per permit appeal. (§§ 665.13,
665.17, 665.142, 665.162, 665.203,
665.242, 665.262, 665.404, 665.442,
665.462, 665.603, 665.642, 665.662,
665.801, and 665.807.)
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Community Development, Fisheries,
Fishing, Western and central Pacific.
Dated: June 9, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 665—FISHERIES IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
l. The authority citation for part 665
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In part 665, add a new § 665.20 to
subpart A read as follows:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 665.20 Western Pacific community
development program.
(a) General. In accordance with the
criteria and procedures specified in this
section, the Regional Administrator may
authorize the direct or incidental
harvest of management unit species that
would otherwise be prohibited by this
part.
(b) Eligibility. To be eligible to
participate in the Western Pacific
community development program, a
community must meet the following
criteria:
(1) Be located in American Samoa,
Guam, Hawaii, or the Northern Mariana
Islands (collectively, the western
Pacific);
(2) Consist of community residents
descended from aboriginal people
indigenous to the western Pacific area
who conducted commercial or
subsistence fishing using traditional
fishing practices in the waters of the
western Pacific;
(3) Consist of individuals who reside
in their ancestral homeland;
(4) Have knowledge of customary
practices relevant to fisheries of the
western Pacific;
(5) Have a traditional dependence on
fisheries of the western Pacific;
(6) Are currently experiencing
economic or other constraints that have
prevented full participation in the
western Pacific fisheries and, in recent
years, have not had harvesting,
processing or marketing capability
sufficient to support substantial
participation in fisheries in the area;
and
(7) Develop and submit a community
development plan to the Council and
the NMFS that meets the requirements
in paragraph (c) of this section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
(c) Community development plan. An
eligible community seeking access to a
fishery under the authority of the
Council and NMFS must submit to the
Council a community development plan
that includes, but is not limited to, the
following information:
(1) A statement of the purposes and
goals of the plan.
(2) A description and justification for
the specific fishing activity being
proposed, including:
(i) Location of the proposed fishing
activity.
(ii) Management unit species to be
harvested, and any potential bycatch.
(iii) Gear type(s) to be used.
(iv) Frequency and duration of the
proposed fishing activity.
(3) A statement describing the degree
of involvement by the indigenous
community members, including the
name, address, telephone and other
contact information of each individual
conducting the proposed fishing
activity.
(4) A description of how the
community and or its members meet
each of the eligibility criteria in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(5) If a vessel is to be used by the
community to conduct fishing activities,
for each vessel:
(i) Vessel name and official number
(USCG documentation, state, territory,
or other registration number).
(ii) Vessel length overall,
displacement, and fish holding capacity.
(iii) Any valid federal fishing permit
number(s).
(iv) Name, address, and telephone
number of the vessel owner(s) and
operator(s).
(d) Council review. The Council will
review each community development
plan to ensure that it meets the intent
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and
contains all required information. The
Council may consider advice of its
advisory panels in conducting this
review. If the Council finds the
community development plan is
complete, it will transmit the plan to the
Regional Administrator for review.
(e) Agency review and approval. (1)
Upon receipt of a community
development plan from the Council, the
Regional Administrator will review the
plan for consistency with the FEPs,
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable laws. The Regional
Administrator may request from the
applicant additional information
necessary to make the determinations
pursuant to this section and other
applicable laws before proceeding with
the review pursuant to paragraph (e)(2)
of this section.
(2) If the Regional Administrator
determines that a plan contains the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34091
required information and is consistent
with the FEPs, Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable laws, NMFS will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
to solicit public comment on the
proposed plan and any associated
environmental review documents. The
notice will include the following:
(i) A description of the fishing activity
to be conducted.
(ii) The current utilization of domestic
annual harvesting and processing
capacity (including existing
experimental harvesting, if any) of the
target, incidental, and bycatch species.
(iii) A summary of any regulations
that would otherwise prohibit the
proposed fishing activity.
(iv) Biological and environmental
information relevant to the plan,
including appropriate statements of
environmental impacts on target and
non-target stocks, marine mammals, and
threatened or endangered species.
(3) Within 90 days from the end of the
comment period on the plan, the
Regional Administrator will notify the
applicant in writing of the decision to
approve or disapprove the plan.
(4) If disapproved, the Regional
Administrator will provide the reasons
for the plan’s disapproval and provide
the community with the opportunity to
modify the plan and resubmit it for
review. Reasons for disapproval may
include, but are not limited to, the
following:
(i) The applicant failed to disclose
material information or made false
statements related to the plan.
(ii) The harvest would contribute to
overfishing or would hinder the
recovery of an overfished stock,
according to the best scientific
information available.
(iii) The activity would be
inconsistent with an FEP or other
applicable law.
(iv) The activity would create a
significant enforcement, monitoring, or
administrative problem, as determined
by the Regional Administrator.
(5) If approved, the Regional
Administrator will publish a notice of
the authorization in the Federal
Register, and may attach limiting terms
and conditions to the authorization
including, but not limited to, the
following:
(i) The maximum amount of each
management unit species and potential
bycatch species that may be harvested
and landed during the term of the
authorization.
(ii) The number, sizes, names,
identification numbers, and federal
permit numbers of the vessels
authorized to conduct fishing activities.
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
34092
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(iii) Type, size, and amount of gear
used by each vessel, including trip
limits.
(iv) The times and places where
fishing may or may not be conducted.
(v) Notification, observer, vessel
monitoring, and reporting requirements.
(f) Duration. Unless otherwise
specified, and unless revoked,
suspended, or modified, a plan may be
effective for no longer than five years.
(g) Transfer. Plans authorized under
this section are not transferable or
assignable.
(h) Sanctions. The Regional
Administrator may revoke, suspend or
modify a community development plan
in the case of failure to comply with the
terms and conditions of the plan, any
other applicable provision of this part,
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, or other
applicable laws.
(i) Program review. NMFS and the
Council will periodically review and
assess each plan. If fishery,
environmental, or other conditions have
changed such that the plan’s goals or
requirements are not being met, or the
fishery has become in an overfished
state or overfishing is occurring, the
Regional Administrator may revoke,
suspend, or modify the plan.
[FR Doc. 2010–14550 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 697
[Docket No. 0912011421–0200–01]
RIN 0648–AY41
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act Provisions; Weakfish
Fishery
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; re-opening of
comment period.
SUMMARY: NMFS is reopening the
comment period on the proposed rule to
set the commercial possession limit for
weakfish caught in the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) at 100 lb (45 kg)
per day or trip, whichever is longer in
duration, and set the recreational
possession limit at 1 fish per person per
day or trip, whichever is longer in
duration. The intent of the proposed
rule is to modify regulations for the
Atlantic coast stock of weakfish to be
more compatible with Addendum IV to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
Amendment 4 of the Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission’s
(Commission) Interstate Fishery
Management Plan (ISFMP) for weakfish.
Such action is authorized under the
Atlantic Coastal Fisheries Cooperative
Management Act (Atlantic Coastal Act).
DATES: The deadline for written
comments on the May 12, 2010 (75 FR
26703), proposed rule is re-opened.
Comments will be accepted through
June 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 0648–AY41, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Suite
13317, Silver Spring, MD 20910, Attn:
State-Federal Team. Mark the outside of
the envelope: AComments on Weakfish
Addendum IV.@
• Fax: (301) 713–0596, Attn: StateFederal Team.
Instructions: No comments will be
posted for public viewing until after the
comment period has closed. All
comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be
posted to https://regulations.gov without
change. All Personal Identifying
Information (for example, name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter may be publicly
accessible. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter N/A in the required
fields, if you wish to remain
anonymous). You may submit
attachments to electronic comments in
Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or
Adobe PDF file formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Hooker, (301) 713–2334.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 3, 2009, the
Commission adopted Addendum IV to
Amendment 4 to the ISFMP for
Weakfish (Addendum IV), in response
to the stock status of weakfish. A recent
peer-reviewed assessment found the
weakfish stock to be depleted, with
spawning stock biomass estimated to be
three percent of an unfished stock, well
below the 20–percent threshold and 30–
percent target reference points approved
by the Commission’s Weakfish
Management Board as part of
Addendum IV. The decline in biomass
reflects a sustained rise in natural
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
mortality after 1995, rather than an
increase in fishing mortality, which has
been modest and stable over the same
time period. In response to these
findings, the Commission’s Weakfish
Management Board approved
management measures to reduce
exploitation of weakfish by more than
50–percent in both the recreational and
commercial sectors. Addendum IV
requires states to implement a one-fish
recreational creel limit, 100 lb (45 kg)
commercial trip limit, and 100 lb (45 kg)
commercial bycatch limit during closed
seasons. Addendum IV maintains the
current 12–inch (30.5 cm) minimum
size for weakfish, and reduces the
number of undersized fish that may be
retained per commercial trip from 300
to 100 fish. The sale of undersized fish
continues to be prohibited. In
implementing Amendment 4 to the
weakfish plan, NMFS never adopted the
300 undersized fish exception to the 12–
inch (30.5 cm) minimum fish size in
Federal waters. NMFS continues the
policy of no exemptions to the
minimum size limit in the weakfish
fishery here by not proposing a 100
undersized fish exception to the current
minimum size limit in Federal waters.
The Commission recommended in
Addendum IV that NMFS promulgate
all necessary regulations to implement
complementary measures to those
approved in the addendum.
On May 12, 2010, NMFS published a
proposed rule that would implement
compatible management measures in
the EEZ in the Federal Register (75 FR
26703) with a 30–day comment period
that ended on June 11, 2010. NMFS
received a request from the State of
North Carolina to extend the comment
period for the proposed rule so that they
could complete an analysis of the
economic impacts of the proposed rule
on North Carolina fisheries and submit
that information as part of the State’s
comments on the rule. This additional
information would be beneficial to our
analysis of economic impacts of the
proposed rule. Therefore, to allow for
additional public comment to be
submitted beyond the initial 30–day
deadline, NMFS is reopening the
comment period on the proposed rule
through June 30, 2010.
Dated: June 11, 2010.
Eric C. Schwab,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheies, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–14541 Filed 6–11–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\16JNP1.SGM
16JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34088-34092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14550]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 0907211157-0224-02]
RIN 0648-AX76
Fisheries in the Western Pacific; Community Development Program
Process
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 34089]]
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish requirements and procedures
for soliciting, reviewing, and approving community development plans
for access to western Pacific fisheries. The intent of this proposed
rule is to promote the participation of island communities in fisheries
that they have traditionally depended upon, but may not have the
capabilities to support continued and substantial participation in,
possibly due to economic, regulatory, or other constraints.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by July 20, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments on this proposed rule, identified by 0648-AX76, may
be sent to either of the following addresses:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal www.regulations.gov; or
Mail: Mail written comments to Michael D. Tosatto, Acting
Regional Administrator, NMFS, Pacific Islands Region (PIR), 1601
Kapiolani Blvd., Suite 1110, Honolulu, HI 96814-4700.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted to one of the above two
addresses to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent to any other address or individual,
or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered.
All comments received are a part of the public record and will
generally be posted to www.regulations.gov without change. All personal
identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender may be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the
required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel,
WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) prepared
amendments to the fishery ecosystem plans (FEP) for American Samoa,
Hawaii, Marianas, and western Pacific Pelagics. These amendments
contain background information on the issue. The amendments and
proposed regulations, which are identical for all FEPs, are available
from www.regulations.gov, and from the Council, 1164 Bishop St., Suite
1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 808-522-8220, fax 808-522-8226,
www.wpcouncil.org.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other
aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this
proposed rule may be submitted to Michael D. Tosatto (see ADDRESSES)
and by e-mail to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIR, Sustainable
Fisheries, 808-944-2108.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document is also accessible at
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr.
Section 305(i)(2) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act authorizes the
Council and the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), through NMFS, to
establish a western Pacific community development program for any
fishery under the authority of the Council and NMFS. The intent of the
program is to provide western Pacific communities access to fisheries
that they have traditionally depended upon, but may not have the
capabilities to support continued and substantial participation in,
possibly due to economic, regulatory, or other barriers.
In 2002, NMFS published the eligibility criteria for participating
in the western Pacific community development program (67 FR 18512;
April 16, 2002), but did not establish a mechanism to solicit and
review development plans under the program. To address this issue, the
Council developed and submitted to NMFS for review, amendments to the
American Samoa, Hawaii, Marianas, and western Pacific Pelagic FEPs to
establish this mechanism. The amendments are identical for each FEP.
This proposed rule would codify the eligibility criteria, as
previously published (67 FR 18512; April 16, 2002), for participating
in the program. To be eligible, a community must:
1. Be located in American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, or the Northern
Mariana Islands (collectively, the western Pacific);
2. Consist of community residents descended from aboriginal people
indigenous to the western Pacific area who conducted commercial or
subsistence fishing using traditional fishing practices in the waters
of the western Pacific;
3. Consist of individuals who reside in their ancestral homeland;
4. Have knowledge of customary practices relevant to fisheries of
the western Pacific;
5. Have a traditional dependence on fisheries of the western
Pacific;
6. Are experiencing economic or other barriers or constraints that
prevent full participation in the western Pacific fisheries and, in
recent years, have not had harvesting, processing or marketing
capability sufficient to support substantial participation in fisheries
in the area; and
7. Develop and submit a community development plan to the Council
and NMFS.
This proposed rule would require a community development plan to
contain:
1. A statement of the purpose and goals of the plan;
2. A description of, and justification for, the proposed fishing
activity;
3. The location of the proposed fishing activity;
4. The species to be harvested, directly and incidentally;
5. The gear type(s) to be used;
6. The frequency and duration of the proposed fishing activity; and
7. A statement describing the degree of involvement by the
indigenous community members including the name, address, telephone and
other contact information of each person who would conduct the proposed
fishing activity, and a description of how the community and or its
members meet each of the eligibility criteria.
If a vessel is to be used by the community to conduct fishing
activities, the community development plan must include the vessel name
and official number (USCG documentation, state, territory, or other
registration number), length, displacement, fish holding capacity, any
valid federal fishing permit number, and the name and contact
information of the owner(s) and operator(s).
The proposed rule would require the Council to review each plan to
ensure that it meets the intent of Section 305(i)(2) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and contains all required information. If the Council finds
that these requirements are met, the Council would then forward the
plan to the NMFS Regional Administrator for review.
This proposed rule would require the Regional Administrator to
review each plan to ensure the plan is consistent with the FEPs, the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable laws. NMFS would then
publish a notice in the Federal Register to solicit public comment on
the community development plan and any associated environmental review
documents.
Within 90 days after the close of the public comment period for the
plan, the Regional Administrator would be required to notify the
applicant in writing of the decision to approve or disapprove the plan.
If the plan is
[[Page 34090]]
approved, the NMFS Regional Administrator would publish a notice in the
Federal Register describing the plan's authorized activities. The
Regional Administrator may attach limiting terms and conditions to the
authorization to ensure proper management and monitoring of the fishing
activity, including, but not limited to, catch and trip limits, times
and places where fishing may or may not be conducted, vessel monitoring
system, observers, and/or reporting requirements.
To be considered, comments on this proposed rule must be received
by July 20, 2010, not postmarked or otherwise transmitted by that date.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the fishery ecosystem plans for American Samoa, Hawaii,
the Marianas, and western Pacific pelagic fisheries, other provisions
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable laws, subject to
further consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The analysis follows:
The Council has proposed to amend the FEPs for American Samoa,
Hawaii, Marianas, and western Pacific pelagics to establish a
process to solicit, review, and implement community development
plans submitted by eligible western Pacific communities. The Council
and NMFS would review each plan and, if it meets all requirements,
NMFS would authorize the plan. The proposed action is intended to
promote participation in fisheries that communities have
traditionally depended upon, but may not have capabilities to
support continued and substantial participation in, possibly due to
economic, regulatory, or other constraints. A description of the
action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained in the preamble to this proposed rule. This
proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with other
Federal rules. The proposed rule would only establish a procedure
for the solicitation, review, and implementation of plans under the
western Pacific community development program. This procedure is not
expected to result in any significant economic impact on any western
Pacific community. If subsequent rulemaking to implement approved
plans directly impacts the economic profitability, or proxy thereof,
of a community with an approved community development plan, NMFS
will prepare an IRFA for that specific action.
As a result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required and none has been prepared.
This proposed rule contains a new collection-of-information
requirement subject to review and approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This
requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval.
Public reporting burden for developing and submitting a development
plan is estimated to average six hours per response, including the time
for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering
and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection information.
Public comment is sought regarding whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility, the accuracy of the burden estimate, ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected, and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information including through
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments on these or any other aspects of
the collection of information to Michael D. Tosatto (see ADDRESSES),
and by email to David_Rostker@omb.eop.gov or by fax to 202-395-7285.
Because approved plans may be subject to additional conditions,
this proposed rule also contains collection-of-information requirements
subject to the PRA that have been previously approved by OMB. NMFS
estimates that it may receive and process up to five (5) community
development plan proposals each year. Therefore, the additional
estimated burden on western Pacific community development plan
respondents would not exceed the currently-approved burden estimates
for the existing PRA collections listed below:
(1) Approved under 0648-0214, 0648-0577, 0648-0584, 0648-0586, and
0649-0589. (a) PIR logbook family of forms estimated at 5 minutes (min)
per reporting action; (b) pre-trip and post-landing notifications
estimated at 5 min per reporting action; (c) experimental fishing
reports estimated at 4 hours (hr) per reporting action; (d) sales and
transshipment reports estimated at 5 min per reporting action; (e)
report on gear left at sea estimated at 5 min per reporting action; (f)
claims for reimbursement for lost fishing time estimated at 4 hr per
claim; (g) request for pelagics area closure exemption estimated at 1
hr per request; and (h) observer placement meetings estimated at 1 hr
per reporting action. (Sec. Sec. 665.14, 665.17, 665.105, 665.144,
665.145, 665.205, 665.207, 665.244, 665.247, 665.407, 665.444, 665.445,
665.606, 665.644, 665.645, 665.803, and 665.808.)
(2) Approved under 0648-0360, 0648-0361, 0648-0584, 0648-0586, and
0648-0589. PIR gear marking and vessel identification (a) estimated at
45 min to 1 hr 15 min per vessel for vessel identification, and (b)
estimated at 2 min for each gear marking. (Sec. Sec. 665.16, 665.128,
665.228, 665.246, 665.428, 665.628, and 665.804.)
(3) Approved under 0648-0441, 0648-0519, and 0648-0584. PIR vessel
monitoring system (a) installation, estimated at 4 hr per reporting
action; (b) repair and maintenance, estimated at 2 hr per reporting
action; and (c) hourly automated position reports, estimated at 24 sec
per day. (Sec. 665.19.)
(4) Approved under 0648-0456. PIR seabird interaction reporting (a)
at-sea notification, estimated at 1 hr per reporting action; (b)
reporting on recovery data form, estimated at 1 hr per reporting
action; and (c) specimen tagging, estimated at 30 min per reporting
action. (Sec. 665.815.)
(5) Approved under 0648-0462. PIR coral reef logbook reporting (a)
at-sea notification, estimated at 3 min per reporting action; (b)
logbook reporting, estimated at 30 min hr per reporting action; and (c)
transshipment reports, estimated at 15 min per reporting action.
(Sec. Sec. 665.14, 665.126, 665.226, and 665.426.)
(6) Approved under 0648-0463. PIR coral reef special permit (a)
application, estimated at 2 hr per application; and (b) special permit
appeals, estimated at 3 hr per appeal. (Sec. Sec. 665.124, 665.224,
665.424, and 665.624.)
(7) Approved under 0648-0490, 0648-0577, 0648-0584, 0648-0586, and
0649-0589: (a) PIR permit family of forms estimated at 30 min hr per
permit action; (b) experimental fishing permits, estimated at 2 hr per
application; and (c) appeals from permit actions estimated at 2 hr per
permit appeal. (Sec. Sec. 665.13, 665.17, 665.142, 665.162, 665.203,
665.242, 665.262, 665.404, 665.442, 665.462, 665.603, 665.642, 665.662,
665.801, and 665.807.)
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless
[[Page 34091]]
that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control
Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 665
Community Development, Fisheries, Fishing, Western and central
Pacific.
Dated: June 9, 2010.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator For Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 665 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 665--FISHERIES IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC
l. The authority citation for part 665 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In part 665, add a new Sec. 665.20 to subpart A read as
follows:
Sec. 665.20 Western Pacific community development program.
(a) General. In accordance with the criteria and procedures
specified in this section, the Regional Administrator may authorize the
direct or incidental harvest of management unit species that would
otherwise be prohibited by this part.
(b) Eligibility. To be eligible to participate in the Western
Pacific community development program, a community must meet the
following criteria:
(1) Be located in American Samoa, Guam, Hawaii, or the Northern
Mariana Islands (collectively, the western Pacific);
(2) Consist of community residents descended from aboriginal people
indigenous to the western Pacific area who conducted commercial or
subsistence fishing using traditional fishing practices in the waters
of the western Pacific;
(3) Consist of individuals who reside in their ancestral homeland;
(4) Have knowledge of customary practices relevant to fisheries of
the western Pacific;
(5) Have a traditional dependence on fisheries of the western
Pacific;
(6) Are currently experiencing economic or other constraints that
have prevented full participation in the western Pacific fisheries and,
in recent years, have not had harvesting, processing or marketing
capability sufficient to support substantial participation in fisheries
in the area; and
(7) Develop and submit a community development plan to the Council
and the NMFS that meets the requirements in paragraph (c) of this
section.
(c) Community development plan. An eligible community seeking
access to a fishery under the authority of the Council and NMFS must
submit to the Council a community development plan that includes, but
is not limited to, the following information:
(1) A statement of the purposes and goals of the plan.
(2) A description and justification for the specific fishing
activity being proposed, including:
(i) Location of the proposed fishing activity.
(ii) Management unit species to be harvested, and any potential
bycatch.
(iii) Gear type(s) to be used.
(iv) Frequency and duration of the proposed fishing activity.
(3) A statement describing the degree of involvement by the
indigenous community members, including the name, address, telephone
and other contact information of each individual conducting the
proposed fishing activity.
(4) A description of how the community and or its members meet each
of the eligibility criteria in paragraph (b) of this section.
(5) If a vessel is to be used by the community to conduct fishing
activities, for each vessel:
(i) Vessel name and official number (USCG documentation, state,
territory, or other registration number).
(ii) Vessel length overall, displacement, and fish holding
capacity.
(iii) Any valid federal fishing permit number(s).
(iv) Name, address, and telephone number of the vessel owner(s) and
operator(s).
(d) Council review. The Council will review each community
development plan to ensure that it meets the intent of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act and contains all required information. The Council may
consider advice of its advisory panels in conducting this review. If
the Council finds the community development plan is complete, it will
transmit the plan to the Regional Administrator for review.
(e) Agency review and approval. (1) Upon receipt of a community
development plan from the Council, the Regional Administrator will
review the plan for consistency with the FEPs, Magnuson-Stevens Act,
and other applicable laws. The Regional Administrator may request from
the applicant additional information necessary to make the
determinations pursuant to this section and other applicable laws
before proceeding with the review pursuant to paragraph (e)(2) of this
section.
(2) If the Regional Administrator determines that a plan contains
the required information and is consistent with the FEPs, Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable laws, NMFS will publish a notice in
the Federal Register to solicit public comment on the proposed plan and
any associated environmental review documents. The notice will include
the following:
(i) A description of the fishing activity to be conducted.
(ii) The current utilization of domestic annual harvesting and
processing capacity (including existing experimental harvesting, if
any) of the target, incidental, and bycatch species.
(iii) A summary of any regulations that would otherwise prohibit
the proposed fishing activity.
(iv) Biological and environmental information relevant to the plan,
including appropriate statements of environmental impacts on target and
non-target stocks, marine mammals, and threatened or endangered
species.
(3) Within 90 days from the end of the comment period on the plan,
the Regional Administrator will notify the applicant in writing of the
decision to approve or disapprove the plan.
(4) If disapproved, the Regional Administrator will provide the
reasons for the plan's disapproval and provide the community with the
opportunity to modify the plan and resubmit it for review. Reasons for
disapproval may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(i) The applicant failed to disclose material information or made
false statements related to the plan.
(ii) The harvest would contribute to overfishing or would hinder
the recovery of an overfished stock, according to the best scientific
information available.
(iii) The activity would be inconsistent with an FEP or other
applicable law.
(iv) The activity would create a significant enforcement,
monitoring, or administrative problem, as determined by the Regional
Administrator.
(5) If approved, the Regional Administrator will publish a notice
of the authorization in the Federal Register, and may attach limiting
terms and conditions to the authorization including, but not limited
to, the following:
(i) The maximum amount of each management unit species and
potential bycatch species that may be harvested and landed during the
term of the authorization.
(ii) The number, sizes, names, identification numbers, and federal
permit numbers of the vessels authorized to conduct fishing activities.
[[Page 34092]]
(iii) Type, size, and amount of gear used by each vessel, including
trip limits.
(iv) The times and places where fishing may or may not be
conducted.
(v) Notification, observer, vessel monitoring, and reporting
requirements.
(f) Duration. Unless otherwise specified, and unless revoked,
suspended, or modified, a plan may be effective for no longer than five
years.
(g) Transfer. Plans authorized under this section are not
transferable or assignable.
(h) Sanctions. The Regional Administrator may revoke, suspend or
modify a community development plan in the case of failure to comply
with the terms and conditions of the plan, any other applicable
provision of this part, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, or other applicable
laws.
(i) Program review. NMFS and the Council will periodically review
and assess each plan. If fishery, environmental, or other conditions
have changed such that the plan's goals or requirements are not being
met, or the fishery has become in an overfished state or overfishing is
occurring, the Regional Administrator may revoke, suspend, or modify
the plan.
[FR Doc. 2010-14550 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S