Interest and Penalty Suspension Provisions Under Section 6404(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, 33992-33995 [2010-14536]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
33992
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(v) Appropriate adjustments.
(vi) Examples.
(2) Segregation rules applicable to
transactions involving the loss
corporation.
(i) In general.
(ii) Direct public group.
(iii) Transactions to which segregation
rules apply.
(A) In general.
(B) Certain equity structure shifts and
transactions to which section 1032
applies.
(1 ) In general.
(2 ) Examples.
(C) Redemption-type transactions.
(1 ) In general.
(2 ) Examples.
(D) Acquisition of loss corporation
stock as the result of the ownership of
a right to acquire stock.
(1) In general.
(2) Example.
(E) Transactions identified in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.
(F) Issuance of rights to acquire loss
corporation stock.
(1) In general.
(2 ) Example.
(iv) Combination of de minimis public
groups.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
(v) Multiple transactions.
(A) In general.
(B) Example.
(vi) Acquisitions made by either a 5percent shareholder or the loss
corporation following application of the
segregation rules.
(3) Segregation rules applicable to
transactions involving first tier entities
or higher tier entities.
(i) Dispositions.
(ii) Example.
(iii) Other transactions affecting direct
public groups of a first tier entity or
higher tier entity.
(iv) Examples.
(v) Acquisitions made by a 5-percent
shareholder, a higher tier entity, or a
first tier entity following application of
the segregation rules.
(k) Operating rules. (1) Presumptions
regarding stock ownership.
(i) Stock subject to regulation by the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
(ii) Statements under penalties of
perjury.
(2) Actual knowledge regarding stock
ownership.
(3) Duty to inquire as to actual stock
ownership in the loss corporation.
(4) Ownership interests structured to
avoid the section 382 limitation.
(5) Example.
(6) First tier entity or higher tier entity
that is a foreign corporation or entity.
[Reserved.]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
(l) Changes in percentage ownership
which are attributable to fluctuations in
value. [Reserved]
(m) Effective date. (1) In general.
(2) Plan of reorganization.
(3) Earliest commencement of the
testing period.
(4) Transitional rules.
(i) Rules provided in paragraph (j) of
this section for testing dates before
September 4, 1987.
(ii) Example.
(iii) Rules provided in paragraph (j) of
this section for testing dates on or after
September 4, 1987.
(iv) Rules provided in paragraphs
(f)(18)(ii) and (iii) of this section.
(v) Rules provided in paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) of this section.
(vi) Rules provided in paragraph
(h)(4) of this section.
(vii) Rules provided in paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section.
(5) Bankruptcy proceedings.
(i) In general.
(ii) Example.
(6) Transactions of domestic building
and loan associations.
(7) Transactions not subject to section
382.
(i) Application of old section 382.
(ii) Effect on testing period.
(iii) Termination of old section 382.
[Reserved]
(8) Options issued or transferred
before January 1, 1987.
(i) Options issued before May 6, 1986.
(ii) Options issued on or after May 6,
1986 and before September 18, 1986.
(iii) Options issued on or after
September 18, 1986 and before January
1, 1987.
(9) Examples.
■ Par. 3. Section 1.382–1 is amended
by:
■ 1. Revising the introductory text.
■ 2. Removing the entry for § 1.382–1T.
■ 3. Removing the entries for § 1.382–
2T.
■ 4. Adding the entries for § 1.382–7.
The revisions and the additions read
as follows:
§ 1.382–1
Table of contents.
This section lists the captions that
appear in the regulations for §§ 1.382–
2 through 1.382–11.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 1.382–7
Built-in gains and losses.
(a) Treatment of prepaid income.
(b) Effective/applicability dates.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.382–7 is added to
read as follows:
§ 1.382–7
Built-in gains and losses.
(a) Treatment of prepaid income. For
purposes of section 382(h), prepaid
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
income is not recognized built-in gain.
The term prepaid income means any
amount received prior to the change
date that is attributable to performance
occurring on or after the change date.
Examples to which this paragraph (a)
will apply include, but are not limited
to, income received prior to the change
date that is deferred under section 455,
§ 1.451–5, or Rev. Proc. 2004–34 (2004–
1 CB 991 (June 1, 2004)) (or any
successor revenue procedure) (see
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)).
(b) Effective/applicability dates. This
section applies to loss corporations that
have undergone an ownership change
on or after June 11, 2010. For loss
corporations that have undergone an
ownership change before June 11, 2010,
see § 1.382–7T as contained in 26 CFR
part 1, revised April 1, 2009.
§ 1.382–7T
■
[Removed]
Par. 5. Section 1.382–7T is removed.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 8, 2010.
Michael Mundaca,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2010–14431 Filed 6–11–10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4820–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9488]
RIN 1545–BE07
Interest and Penalty Suspension
Provisions Under Section 6404(g) of
the Internal Revenue Code
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of
temporary regulations.
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations under section 6404(g)(2)(E)
of the Internal Revenue Code on the
suspension of any interest, penalty,
addition to tax, or additional amount
with respect to listed transactions or
undisclosed reportable transactions. The
final regulations reflect changes to the
law made by the Internal Revenue
Service Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998, the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of
2005, the Tax Relief and Health Care
Act of 2006, and the Small Business and
Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007. The
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
regulations provide guidance to
individual taxpayers who have
participated in listed transactions or
undisclosed reportable transactions.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective on June 16, 2010.
Applicability Date: These regulations
apply to interest relating to listed
transactions and undisclosed reportable
transactions accruing before, on, or after
October 3, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Lucey, (202) 622–3630 (not a
toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On June 21, 2007, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register temporary
regulations (TD 9333), 2007–33 IRB 350
(72 FR 34176) and a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG–149036–04), 2007–33
IRB 365 (72 FR 34204) by crossreference to temporary regulations. No
written comments were received, and
no public hearing was requested or
held. Accordingly, the final regulations
adopt the rules of the temporary
regulations and the temporary
regulations are removed. See
§ 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
Background
This document amends the Procedure
and Administration Regulations (26 CFR
part 301) by adding rules under section
6404(g) relating to the suspension of
interest, penalties, additions to tax, or
additional amounts with respect to
listed transactions or undisclosed
reportable transactions. Section 3305 of
the Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998,
Public Law 105–206 (112 Stat. 685, 743)
(RRA 98), added section 6404(g) to the
Code, effective for taxable years ending
after July 22, 1998. Section 6404(g)
generally suspends interest and certain
penalties if the IRS does not contact a
taxpayer regarding possible adjustments
to the taxpayer’s liability within a
specified period of time. Section 903(c)
of the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004, Public Law 108–357 (118 Stat.
1418, 1652) (AJCA), excepted from the
general interest suspension rules any
interest, penalty, addition to tax, or
additional amount with respect to a
listed transaction or an undisclosed
reportable transaction, effective for
interest accruing after October 3, 2004.
Section 303 of the Gulf Opportunity
Zone Act of 2005, Public Law 109–135
(119 Stat. 2577, 2608–09) (GOZA),
modified the effective date of the
exception from the suspension rules for
certain listed and reportable
transactions. Section 426(b) of the Tax
Relief and Health Care Act of 2006,
Public Law 109–432 (120 Stat. 2922,
2975), provided a technical correction
regarding the authority to exercise the
‘‘reasonably and in good faith’’ exception
to the effective date rules. Section 8242
of the Small Business and Work
Opportunity Tax Act of 2007, Public
Law 110–28 (121 Stat. 190, 200),
extended the current eighteen-month
period within which the IRS can,
without suspension of interest, contact
a taxpayer regarding possible
adjustments to the taxpayer’s liability to
thirty-six months, effective for notices
provided after November 25, 2007.
Special Analyses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
It has been determined that this
Treasury decision is not a significant
regulatory action as defined in
Executive Order 12866. A regulatory
assessment is therefore not required. It
has also been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because these
regulations do not impose a collection
of information on small entities, the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) do not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, the NPRM by
cross-reference to temporary regulations
preceding these regulations was
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business and no
comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Matthew Lucey of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
Par. 2. Section 301.6404–0 is
amended by adding an entry for
§ 301.6404–4 to read as follows:
■
§ 301.6404–0
*
*
*
Table of Contents.
*
*
§ 301.6404–4 Suspension of interest and
certain penalties when the Internal
Revenue Service does not timely contact
the taxpayer.
(a) [Reserved].
(b)(1) through (b)(4) [Reserved].
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33993
(5) Listed transactions and undisclosed
reportable transactions.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for certain listed or
undisclosed reportable transactions.
(A) Participant in a settlement initiative.
(1) Participant in a settlement initiative
who as of January 23, 2006, had not reached
agreement with the IRS.
(2) Participant in a settlement initiative
who, as of January 23, 2006, had reached
agreement with the IRS.
(B) Taxpayer acting in good faith.
(1) In general.
(2) Presumption.
(3) Examples.
(C) Closed transactions.
(c) [Reserved].
(d) Effective date.
Par. 3. Section 301.6404–4 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 301.6404–4 Suspension of interest and
certain penalties when the Internal Revenue
Service does not timely contact the
taxpayer.
(a) [Reserved].
(b)(1) through (4) [Reserved].
(5) Listed transactions and
undisclosed reportable transactions—(i)
In general. The general rule of
suspension under section 6404(g)(1)
does not apply to any interest, penalty,
addition to tax, or additional amount
with respect to any listed transaction as
defined in section 6707A(c) or any
undisclosed reportable transaction. For
purposes of this section, an undisclosed
reportable transaction is a reportable
transaction described in the regulations
under section 6011 that is not
adequately disclosed under those
regulations and that is not a listed
transaction. The date that the IRS
provides notice to the taxpayer
specifically stating the taxpayer’s
liability regarding a listed transaction or
an undisclosed reportable transaction
and the basis for that liability is the
controlling date for determining
whether the transaction is a listed
transaction or an undisclosed reportable
transaction for purposes of the
suspension rules under section 6404(g).
(ii) Special rule for certain listed or
undisclosed reportable transactions.
With respect to interest relating to listed
transactions and undisclosed reportable
transactions accruing on or before
October 3, 2004, the exception to the
general rule of interest suspension will
not apply to a taxpayer who is a
participant in a settlement initiative
with respect to that transaction, to any
transaction in which the taxpayer has
acted reasonably and in good faith, or to
a closed transaction. For purposes of
this special rule, a ‘‘participant in a
settlement initiative,’’ a ‘‘taxpayer acting
in good faith,’’ and a ‘‘closed
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
33994
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
transaction’’ have the following
meanings:
(A) Participant in a settlement
initiative—(1) Participant in a
settlement initiative who, as of January
23, 2006, had not reached agreement
with the IRS. A participant in a
settlement initiative includes a taxpayer
who, as of January 23, 2006, was
participating in a settlement initiative
described in Internal Revenue Service
Announcement 2005–80, 2005–2 C.B.
967. See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this
chapter. A taxpayer participates in the
initiative by complying with Section 5
of the Announcement. A taxpayer is not
a participant in a settlement initiative if,
after January 23, 2006, the taxpayer
withdraws from or terminates
participation in the initiative, or the IRS
determines that a settlement agreement
will not be reached under the initiative
within a reasonable period of time.
(2) Participant in a settlement
initiative who, as of January 23, 2006,
had reached agreement with the IRS. A
participant in a settlement initiative is
a taxpayer who, as of January 23, 2006,
had entered into a settlement agreement
under Announcement 2005–80 or any
other prior or contemporaneous
settlement initiative either offered
through published guidance or, if the
initiative was not formally published,
direct contact with taxpayers known to
have participated in a tax shelter
promotion.
(B) Taxpayer acting in good faith—(1)
In general. The IRS may suspend
interest relating to a listed transaction or
an undisclosed reportable transaction
accruing on or before October 3, 2004,
if the taxpayer has acted reasonably and
in good faith. The IRS’s determination
of whether a taxpayer has acted
reasonably and in good faith will take
into account all the facts and
circumstances surrounding the
transaction. The facts and circumstances
include, but are not limited to, whether
the taxpayer disclosed the transaction
and the taxpayer’s course of conduct
after being identified as participating in
the transaction, including the taxpayer’s
response to opportunities afforded to
the taxpayer to settle the transaction,
and whether the taxpayer engaged in
unreasonable delay at any stage of the
matter.
(2) Presumption. If a taxpayer and the
IRS promptly enter into a settlement
agreement with respect to a transaction
on terms proposed by the IRS or, in the
event of atypical facts and
circumstances, on terms more favorable
to the taxpayer, and the taxpayer has
complied with the terms of that
agreement without unreasonable delay,
the taxpayer will be presumed to have
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
acted reasonably and in good faith
except in rare and unusual
circumstances. Rare and unusual
circumstances must involve specific
actions involving harm to tax
administration. Even if a taxpayer does
not qualify for the presumption
described in this paragraph
(b)(5)(iii)(B)(2), the taxpayer may still be
granted interest suspension under the
general facts and circumstances test set
forth in paragraph (b)(5)(iii)(B)(1) of this
section.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules the IRS uses in
determining whether a taxpayer has
acted reasonably and in good faith.
Example 1. The taxpayer participated in a
listed transaction. The IRS, in a letter sent
directly to the taxpayer in July 2005,
proposed a settlement of the transaction. The
taxpayer informed the IRS of his interest in
the settlement within the prescribed time
period. The revenue agent assigned to the
taxpayer’s case was not able to calculate the
taxpayer’s liability under the settlement or
tender a closing agreement to the taxpayer
until March 2006. The taxpayer promptly
executed the closing agreement and returned
it to the IRS with a proposal for arrangements
to pay the agreed-upon liability. The IRS
agreed with the proposed arrangements for
full payment. For purposes of the application
of section 6404(g)(2)(E), the taxpayer has
acted reasonably and in good faith. Interest
accruing on or before October 3, 2004,
relating to the transaction in which the
taxpayer participated will be suspended.
Example 2. The facts are the same as in
Example 1, except that the letter was sent by
the IRS in February 2006, and the closing
agreement was tendered to the taxpayer in
April 2006. For purposes of the application
of section 6404(g)(2)(E), the taxpayer has
acted reasonably and in good faith. Interest
accruing on or before October 3, 2004,
relating to the transaction in which the
taxpayer participated will be suspended.
Example 3. The taxpayer participated in
a listed transaction. In response to an offer
of settlement extended by the IRS in August
2005, the taxpayer informed the IRS of her
interest in entering into a closing agreement
on the terms proposed by the IRS. The
revenue agent assigned to the transaction
calculated the taxpayer’s liability under the
settlement and tendered a closing agreement
to the taxpayer in November 2005. The
taxpayer executed the closing agreement but
failed to make any arrangement for payment
of the agreed-upon liability stated in the
closing agreement. Taking into account all
the facts and circumstances surrounding the
transaction, the taxpayer did not act
reasonably and in good faith. Interest
accruing on or before October 3, 2004,
relating to the transaction in which the
taxpayer participated will not be suspended.
Example 4. The taxpayer participated in a
listed transaction. In a letter sent by the IRS
directly to the taxpayer in July 2005, the IRS
extended an offer of settlement. The July
2005 letter informed the taxpayer that, absent
atypical facts and circumstances, the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
taxpayer should not expect resolution of the
tax issues on more favorable terms than
proposed in the letter. The taxpayer declined
the proposed settlement terms of the letter
and proceeded to Appeals to present what
the taxpayer claimed were atypical facts and
circumstances. The administrative file did
not contain sufficient information bearing on
atypical facts and circumstances, and the
taxpayer failed to provide additional
information when requested by Appeals to
explain how the transaction originally
proposed to the taxpayer differed in structure
or types of tax benefits claimed, from the
transaction as implemented by the taxpayer.
Appeals determined that the taxpayer’s facts
and circumstances were not significantly
different from those of other taxpayers who
participated in that listed transaction and
thus, were not atypical. In September 2006,
the taxpayer and Appeals entered into a
closing agreement on terms consistent with
those originally proposed in the July 2005
letter. The taxpayer has complied with the
terms of that closing agreement. For purposes
of the application of section 6404(g)(2)(E),
this taxpayer is not presumed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith; instead, the IRS
will apply the general rule to determine
whether to suspend interest accruing on or
before October 3, 2004, relating to the
transaction in which the taxpayer
participated.
Example 5. The facts are the same as in
Example 4, except that Appeals agrees that
atypical facts were present that warrant
additional concessions by the government. A
settlement is reached on terms more
favorable to the taxpayer than those proposed
in the July 2005 letter. For purposes of the
application of section 6404(g)(2)(E), this
taxpayer is presumed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith, and absent
evidence of rare or unusual circumstances
harmful to tax administration, is eligible for
suspension of interest accruing on or before
October 3, 2004, relating to the transaction in
which the taxpayer participated.
(C) Closed transactions. A transaction
is considered closed for purposes of this
clause if, as of December 14, 2005, the
assessment of all federal income taxes
for the taxable year in which the tax
liability to which the interest relates is
prevented by the operation of any law
or rule of law, or a closing agreement
under section 7121 has been entered
into with respect to the tax liability
arising in connection with the
transaction.
(c) [Reserved].
(d) Effective/Applicability date.
Paragraph (b)(5) of these regulations
applies to interest relating to listed
transactions and undisclosed reportable
transactions accruing before, on, or after
October 3, 2004.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
§ 301.6404–4T
[Removed]
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Par. 4. Section 301.6404–4T is
removed.
■
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 10, 2010.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
Regulatory Information
[FR Doc. 2010–14536 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0496]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Michigan Orthopaedic
Society 50th Anniversary Fireworks,
Lake Huron, Mackinac Island, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on,
Lake Huron, Mackinac Island, Michigan.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of Lake Huron during the
Michigan Orthopaedic Society 50th
Anniversary Fireworks display, June 19,
2010. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m.
until 11 p.m. on June 19, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0496 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0496 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail BMC Gregory Ford,
Marine Event Coordinator, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Sault Sainte Marie;
telephone 906–635–3222, e-mail
Gregory.C.Ford@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:21 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the
permit application was not received in
time to publish an NPRM followed by
a final rule before the effective date.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property.
Basis and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and spectators from hazards associated
with a fireworks display. Based on the
explosive hazards of fireworks, the
Captain of the Port Sault Sainte Marie
has determined that fireworks launches
proximate to watercraft pose significant
risk to public safety and property. The
likely combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, congested waterways,
darkness punctuated by bright flashes of
light, alcohol use, and debris falling into
the water presents a significant risk of
serious injuries or fatalities. Establishing
a temporary safety zone to control vessel
movement around the location of the
launch platform will help ensure the
safety of persons and property at this
event and help minimize the associated
risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the setup and launching
of fireworks in conjunction with the
Michigan Orthopaedic Society 50th
Anniversary Fireworks display. The
fireworks display will occur between
9:45 p.m. and 11 p.m. on June 19, 2010.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33995
The safety zone will be enforced from
9 p.m. to 11 p.m. on June 19, 2010. The
safety zone for the fireworks will
encompass all waters of Lake Huron
within a 500-foot radius of the fireworks
launch site, approximately 460 yards
south of Biddle Point, at position
45°50′32.82″ N., 084°37′03.18″ W:
[DATUM: NAD 83].
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Sault Sainte Marie, or his onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from enforcement of the zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of Lake Huron, Mackinac
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33992-33995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14536]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[TD 9488]
RIN 1545-BE07
Interest and Penalty Suspension Provisions Under Section 6404(g)
of the Internal Revenue Code
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations under section
6404(g)(2)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code on the suspension of any
interest, penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount with respect
to listed transactions or undisclosed reportable transactions. The
final regulations reflect changes to the law made by the Internal
Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, the Tax
Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, and the Small Business and Work
Opportunity Tax Act of 2007. The
[[Page 33993]]
regulations provide guidance to individual taxpayers who have
participated in listed transactions or undisclosed reportable
transactions.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on June 16,
2010.
Applicability Date: These regulations apply to interest relating to
listed transactions and undisclosed reportable transactions accruing
before, on, or after October 3, 2004.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Lucey, (202) 622-3630 (not a
toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends the Procedure and Administration Regulations
(26 CFR part 301) by adding rules under section 6404(g) relating to the
suspension of interest, penalties, additions to tax, or additional
amounts with respect to listed transactions or undisclosed reportable
transactions. Section 3305 of the Internal Revenue Service
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Public Law 105-206 (112 Stat.
685, 743) (RRA 98), added section 6404(g) to the Code, effective for
taxable years ending after July 22, 1998. Section 6404(g) generally
suspends interest and certain penalties if the IRS does not contact a
taxpayer regarding possible adjustments to the taxpayer's liability
within a specified period of time. Section 903(c) of the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004, Public Law 108-357 (118 Stat. 1418, 1652) (AJCA),
excepted from the general interest suspension rules any interest,
penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount with respect to a listed
transaction or an undisclosed reportable transaction, effective for
interest accruing after October 3, 2004. Section 303 of the Gulf
Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, Public Law 109-135 (119 Stat. 2577, 2608-
09) (GOZA), modified the effective date of the exception from the
suspension rules for certain listed and reportable transactions.
Section 426(b) of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, Public
Law 109-432 (120 Stat. 2922, 2975), provided a technical correction
regarding the authority to exercise the ``reasonably and in good
faith'' exception to the effective date rules. Section 8242 of the
Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007, Public Law 110-28
(121 Stat. 190, 200), extended the current eighteen-month period within
which the IRS can, without suspension of interest, contact a taxpayer
regarding possible adjustments to the taxpayer's liability to thirty-
six months, effective for notices provided after November 25, 2007.
On June 21, 2007, the Treasury Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register temporary regulations (TD 9333), 2007-33 IRB 350
(72 FR 34176) and a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-149036-04),
2007-33 IRB 365 (72 FR 34204) by cross-reference to temporary
regulations. No written comments were received, and no public hearing
was requested or held. Accordingly, the final regulations adopt the
rules of the temporary regulations and the temporary regulations are
removed. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b).
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a
significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. A
regulatory assessment is therefore not required. It has also been
determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5
U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small
entities, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) do not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code, the NPRM by cross-reference to temporary regulations
preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small business and no comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Matthew Lucey of the
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *.
0
Par. 2. Section 301.6404-0 is amended by adding an entry for Sec.
301.6404-4 to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6404-0 Table of Contents.
* * * * *
Sec. 301.6404-4 Suspension of interest and certain penalties when
the Internal Revenue Service does not timely contact the taxpayer.
(a) [Reserved].
(b)(1) through (b)(4) [Reserved].
(5) Listed transactions and undisclosed reportable transactions.
(i) In general.
(ii) Special rule for certain listed or undisclosed reportable
transactions.
(A) Participant in a settlement initiative.
(1) Participant in a settlement initiative who as of January 23,
2006, had not reached agreement with the IRS.
(2) Participant in a settlement initiative who, as of January
23, 2006, had reached agreement with the IRS.
(B) Taxpayer acting in good faith.
(1) In general.
(2) Presumption.
(3) Examples.
(C) Closed transactions.
(c) [Reserved].
(d) Effective date.
0
Par. 3. Section 301.6404-4 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6404-4 Suspension of interest and certain penalties when the
Internal Revenue Service does not timely contact the taxpayer.
(a) [Reserved].
(b)(1) through (4) [Reserved].
(5) Listed transactions and undisclosed reportable transactions--
(i) In general. The general rule of suspension under section 6404(g)(1)
does not apply to any interest, penalty, addition to tax, or additional
amount with respect to any listed transaction as defined in section
6707A(c) or any undisclosed reportable transaction. For purposes of
this section, an undisclosed reportable transaction is a reportable
transaction described in the regulations under section 6011 that is not
adequately disclosed under those regulations and that is not a listed
transaction. The date that the IRS provides notice to the taxpayer
specifically stating the taxpayer's liability regarding a listed
transaction or an undisclosed reportable transaction and the basis for
that liability is the controlling date for determining whether the
transaction is a listed transaction or an undisclosed reportable
transaction for purposes of the suspension rules under section 6404(g).
(ii) Special rule for certain listed or undisclosed reportable
transactions. With respect to interest relating to listed transactions
and undisclosed reportable transactions accruing on or before October
3, 2004, the exception to the general rule of interest suspension will
not apply to a taxpayer who is a participant in a settlement initiative
with respect to that transaction, to any transaction in which the
taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, or to a closed
transaction. For purposes of this special rule, a ``participant in a
settlement initiative,'' a ``taxpayer acting in good faith,'' and a
``closed
[[Page 33994]]
transaction'' have the following meanings:
(A) Participant in a settlement initiative--(1) Participant in a
settlement initiative who, as of January 23, 2006, had not reached
agreement with the IRS. A participant in a settlement initiative
includes a taxpayer who, as of January 23, 2006, was participating in a
settlement initiative described in Internal Revenue Service
Announcement 2005-80, 2005-2 C.B. 967. See Sec. 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b)
of this chapter. A taxpayer participates in the initiative by complying
with Section 5 of the Announcement. A taxpayer is not a participant in
a settlement initiative if, after January 23, 2006, the taxpayer
withdraws from or terminates participation in the initiative, or the
IRS determines that a settlement agreement will not be reached under
the initiative within a reasonable period of time.
(2) Participant in a settlement initiative who, as of January 23,
2006, had reached agreement with the IRS. A participant in a settlement
initiative is a taxpayer who, as of January 23, 2006, had entered into
a settlement agreement under Announcement 2005-80 or any other prior or
contemporaneous settlement initiative either offered through published
guidance or, if the initiative was not formally published, direct
contact with taxpayers known to have participated in a tax shelter
promotion.
(B) Taxpayer acting in good faith--(1) In general. The IRS may
suspend interest relating to a listed transaction or an undisclosed
reportable transaction accruing on or before October 3, 2004, if the
taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith. The IRS's
determination of whether a taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good
faith will take into account all the facts and circumstances
surrounding the transaction. The facts and circumstances include, but
are not limited to, whether the taxpayer disclosed the transaction and
the taxpayer's course of conduct after being identified as
participating in the transaction, including the taxpayer's response to
opportunities afforded to the taxpayer to settle the transaction, and
whether the taxpayer engaged in unreasonable delay at any stage of the
matter.
(2) Presumption. If a taxpayer and the IRS promptly enter into a
settlement agreement with respect to a transaction on terms proposed by
the IRS or, in the event of atypical facts and circumstances, on terms
more favorable to the taxpayer, and the taxpayer has complied with the
terms of that agreement without unreasonable delay, the taxpayer will
be presumed to have acted reasonably and in good faith except in rare
and unusual circumstances. Rare and unusual circumstances must involve
specific actions involving harm to tax administration. Even if a
taxpayer does not qualify for the presumption described in this
paragraph (b)(5)(iii)(B)(2), the taxpayer may still be granted interest
suspension under the general facts and circumstances test set forth in
paragraph (b)(5)(iii)(B)(1) of this section.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules the IRS
uses in determining whether a taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good
faith.
Example 1. The taxpayer participated in a listed transaction.
The IRS, in a letter sent directly to the taxpayer in July 2005,
proposed a settlement of the transaction. The taxpayer informed the
IRS of his interest in the settlement within the prescribed time
period. The revenue agent assigned to the taxpayer's case was not
able to calculate the taxpayer's liability under the settlement or
tender a closing agreement to the taxpayer until March 2006. The
taxpayer promptly executed the closing agreement and returned it to
the IRS with a proposal for arrangements to pay the agreed-upon
liability. The IRS agreed with the proposed arrangements for full
payment. For purposes of the application of section 6404(g)(2)(E),
the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith. Interest
accruing on or before October 3, 2004, relating to the transaction
in which the taxpayer participated will be suspended.
Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1, except that
the letter was sent by the IRS in February 2006, and the closing
agreement was tendered to the taxpayer in April 2006. For purposes
of the application of section 6404(g)(2)(E), the taxpayer has acted
reasonably and in good faith. Interest accruing on or before October
3, 2004, relating to the transaction in which the taxpayer
participated will be suspended.
Example 3. The taxpayer participated in a listed transaction.
In response to an offer of settlement extended by the IRS in August
2005, the taxpayer informed the IRS of her interest in entering into
a closing agreement on the terms proposed by the IRS. The revenue
agent assigned to the transaction calculated the taxpayer's
liability under the settlement and tendered a closing agreement to
the taxpayer in November 2005. The taxpayer executed the closing
agreement but failed to make any arrangement for payment of the
agreed-upon liability stated in the closing agreement. Taking into
account all the facts and circumstances surrounding the transaction,
the taxpayer did not act reasonably and in good faith. Interest
accruing on or before October 3, 2004, relating to the transaction
in which the taxpayer participated will not be suspended.
Example 4. The taxpayer participated in a listed transaction. In
a letter sent by the IRS directly to the taxpayer in July 2005, the
IRS extended an offer of settlement. The July 2005 letter informed
the taxpayer that, absent atypical facts and circumstances, the
taxpayer should not expect resolution of the tax issues on more
favorable terms than proposed in the letter. The taxpayer declined
the proposed settlement terms of the letter and proceeded to Appeals
to present what the taxpayer claimed were atypical facts and
circumstances. The administrative file did not contain sufficient
information bearing on atypical facts and circumstances, and the
taxpayer failed to provide additional information when requested by
Appeals to explain how the transaction originally proposed to the
taxpayer differed in structure or types of tax benefits claimed,
from the transaction as implemented by the taxpayer. Appeals
determined that the taxpayer's facts and circumstances were not
significantly different from those of other taxpayers who
participated in that listed transaction and thus, were not atypical.
In September 2006, the taxpayer and Appeals entered into a closing
agreement on terms consistent with those originally proposed in the
July 2005 letter. The taxpayer has complied with the terms of that
closing agreement. For purposes of the application of section
6404(g)(2)(E), this taxpayer is not presumed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith; instead, the IRS will apply the
general rule to determine whether to suspend interest accruing on or
before October 3, 2004, relating to the transaction in which the
taxpayer participated.
Example 5. The facts are the same as in Example 4, except that
Appeals agrees that atypical facts were present that warrant
additional concessions by the government. A settlement is reached on
terms more favorable to the taxpayer than those proposed in the July
2005 letter. For purposes of the application of section
6404(g)(2)(E), this taxpayer is presumed to have acted reasonably
and in good faith, and absent evidence of rare or unusual
circumstances harmful to tax administration, is eligible for
suspension of interest accruing on or before October 3, 2004,
relating to the transaction in which the taxpayer participated.
(C) Closed transactions. A transaction is considered closed for
purposes of this clause if, as of December 14, 2005, the assessment of
all federal income taxes for the taxable year in which the tax
liability to which the interest relates is prevented by the operation
of any law or rule of law, or a closing agreement under section 7121
has been entered into with respect to the tax liability arising in
connection with the transaction.
(c) [Reserved].
(d) Effective/Applicability date. Paragraph (b)(5) of these
regulations applies to interest relating to listed transactions and
undisclosed reportable transactions accruing before, on, or after
October 3, 2004.
[[Page 33995]]
Sec. 301.6404-4T [Removed]
0
Par. 4. Section 301.6404-4T is removed.
Steven T. Miller,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: June 10, 2010.
Michael Mundaca,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2010-14536 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P