Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee; Cancellation of Upcoming Meeting, 34182 [2010-14489]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
34182
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 16, 2010 / Notices
sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
In connection with the approval of
Amendment No. 5 of CoC 1025, the NRC
prepared and published in the Federal
Register a Finding of No Significant
Impact, based upon an environmental
assessment, for the generic use of the
changes authorized by Amendment No.
5 (72 FR 26535, 26537, May 10, 2007).
Further, NRC has evaluated the
impact to public safety that would result
from granting the proposed action. The
approval of the proposed action would
not increase the probability or
consequences of accidents, no changes
would be made to the types of effluents
released offsite, and there would be no
increase in occupational or public
radiation exposure. Therefore, there are
no significant radiological
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed action. Additionally the
proposed action would not involve any
construction or other ground disturbing
activities, would not change the
footprint of the existing ISFSI, and
would have no other significant nonradiological impacts. In this regard, and
as the ISFSI is located on previously
disturbed land, it is extremely unlikely
that approval of the proposed action
would create any significant impact on
the aquatic or terrestrial habitat in the
vicinity of the plant, or to threatened,
endangered, or protected species under
the Endangered Species Act, or to
essential fish habitat covered by the
Magnuson-Stevens Act. Similarly,
approval of the proposed action is not
the type of activity that has the potential
to cause effects on historic or cultural
properties, assuming such properties are
present at the site of the Haddam Neck
ISFSI.
Alternative to the Proposed Action:
Since there is no significant
environmental impact associated with
the proposed action, any alternatives
with equal or greater environmental
impact are not evaluated. The
alternative to the proposed action would
be to deny approval of the exemption.
This alternative would have the same
environmental impact.
Given that there are no significant
differences in environmental impact
between the proposed action and the
alternative considered and that
CYAPCO has a legitimate need, the
Commission concludes that the
preferred alternative is to grant the
requested exemption.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the
proposed action have been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements set
forth in 10 CFR part 51. Based upon the
foregoing Environmental Assessment,
the Commission finds that the proposed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:19 Jun 15, 2010
Jkt 220001
action of granting an exemption from
the specific requirements of 10 CFR
72.212(a)(2), 72.212(b)(2)(i),
72.212(b)(7), and 72.214, will not
significantly impact the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the
Commission has determined not to
prepare an environmental impact
statement for the proposed action.
Further Information
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of
NRC’s ‘‘Rules of Practice,’’ NRC records
and documents related to this action,
including the application for exemption
and supporting documentation are
available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room, at: https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.
From this site, you can access NRC’s
ADAMS, which provides text and image
files of NRC’s public documents. The
ADAMS Accession Number for the
application, dated September 1, 2009, is
ML092520319.
If you do not have access to ADAMS,
or if there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
These documents may also be viewed
electronically on the public computers
located at NRC’s PDR, O1–F21, One
White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR
reproduction contractor will copy
documents, for a fee.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day
of June 2010.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
B. Jennifer Davis,
Acting Chief, Licensing Branch, Division of
Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation, Office
of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2010–14498 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee; Cancellation of Upcoming
Meeting
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Federal Prevailing Rate
Advisory Committee is issuing this
notice to cancel the June 17, 2010,
public meeting scheduled to be held in
Room 5A06A, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management Building, 1900 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC. The original
Federal Register notice announcing this
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
meeting was published Monday, April
12, 2010, at 75 FR 18552.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Madeline Gonzalez, 202–606–2838; email pay-performance-policy@opm.gov;
or FAX: (202) 606–4264.
Sheldon Friedman,
Chairman, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory
Committee, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
[FR Doc. 2010–14489 Filed 6–15–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–49–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Notice of Intent To Prepare a
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment for Proposed Mobile
Fueling Operations, Nationwide
Postal Service.
Notice of intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: To comply with the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Postal Service intends to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment (PEA) for the use of mobile
fueling contractors to fuel postal
vehicles on-site at selected Postal
Service facilities located throughout the
United States. This PEA will evaluate
the environmental impacts of the
proposed action versus taking no action.
DATES: It is estimated that the
Programmatic Environmental
Assessment will be completed by
August 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
direct questions or requests for
additional information to: Melinda
Hulsey Edwards, Manager,
Environmental Compliance and Risk
Mitigation, Environmental Policy and
Programs, U.S. Postal Service, 225 N.
Humphries Blvd., Memphis, TN 38166–
0865; (901) 747–7424.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose. This notice concerns a
proposed operational change for fueling
postal delivery vehicles and the intent
of the Postal Service, pursuant to the
requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, its implementing procedures at 39
CFR part 775, and the President’s
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–1508),
to prepare a Programmatic
Environmental Assessment to evaluate
the environmental impacts of the
proposed action versus taking ‘‘no
action.’’
E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM
16JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 34182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14489]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee; Cancellation of
Upcoming Meeting
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee is issuing this
notice to cancel the June 17, 2010, public meeting scheduled to be held
in Room 5A06A, U.S. Office of Personnel Management Building, 1900 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The original Federal Register notice
announcing this meeting was published Monday, April 12, 2010, at 75 FR
18552.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Madeline Gonzalez, 202-606-2838; e-
mail pay-performance-policy@opm.gov; or FAX: (202) 606-4264.
Sheldon Friedman,
Chairman, Federal Prevailing Rate Advisory Committee, U.S. Office of
Personnel Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-14489 Filed 6-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-49-P
