Safety Zone: July Firework Display in Captain of the Port, Puget Sound AOR, 33696-33698 [2010-14294]
Download as PDF
33696
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–314 to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established for the waters off the
North Eastern shoreline of Mandeville,
CA. The fireworks launch site will be
located approximately 300 feet off the
shore in position 38°03′19.37″ N.,
121°31′54.34″ W. (NAD 83).
During the transit to the launch
location and until the completion of the
fireworks display, from 10 a.m. on July
02, 2010 until 9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2010,
the temporary safety zone applies to the
navigable waters around and under the
fireworks barge during loading and
transit within a radius of 100 feet. From
9:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 04, 2010,
the temporary safety zone applies to the
navigable waters around and under the
barge within a radius of 1,000 feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: May 28, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010–14292 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 165.T11–314 Safety Zone; Delta
Independence Day Foundation Celebration,
Mandeville Island, CA.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 10 a.m. on July 02,2010
through 10 p.m. on July 04, 2010.
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0476]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone: July Firework Display in
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound AOR
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
restricting vessel movement to protect
the maritime public from dangers
associated with firework display. This
action is necessary to restrict vessels
from congregating in close proximity to
the fireworks discharge site during this
display. Entry into, transit through or
mooring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port or Designated
Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m.
on July 4, 2010 until 1 a.m. on July 5,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0476 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting
USCG–2010–0476 in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box, and then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ They
are also available for inspection or
copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Ensign Ashley M.
Wanzer, Sector Seattle Waterways
Management, Coast Guard; telephone
206–217–6175, e-mail
SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary in order
to restrict vessel movement and ensure
maritime public safety during this
firework display.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Immediate action is necessary
in order to restrict vessel movement and
ensure maritime public safety during
this firework display.
Basis and Purpose
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone in order to restrict vessel
movement in and around the fireworks
discharge site. The Coast Guard intends
to promote maritime safety through this
action by ensuring a safe distance is
kept from the fireworks discharge site.
Discussion of Rule
This rule will prevent vessels from
entering and congregating near the
fireworks discharge site. Vessels will be
directed to transit around the zone if the
on-scene patrol commander deems that
it is safe to do so.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. This rule is not a significant
regulatory action because it is minimal
in size and short in duration.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit through the
affected waterways during times of
enforcement. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This safety zone
is minimal in size, short in duration and
if practical then vessels will be able to
transit around the zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
33697
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g.), of the Instruction. This rule
involves a firework display from a barge
in Port Gardner Bay, WA.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination will be made
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
33698
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Coast Guard
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0063]
RIN 1625–AA00
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add temporary section 33 CFR
165.T13–147 to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T13–147: Safety Zone: July Firework
Display in Captain of the Port, Puget Sound
AOR.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
(a) Safety Zone. The following area is
a designated safety zone: all waters of
Port Gardner Bay, WA extending out to
a 300 yard radius from the launch site
at 47°58′51″ N 122°13′16″ W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, no vessel operator may
enter, transit, moor, or anchor within
this safety zone, except for vessels
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators
who desire to enter the safety zone must
obtain permission from the Captain of
the Port or Designated Representative by
contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the
Coast Guard Sector Seattle Joint Harbor
Operations Center (JHOC) via telephone
at 206–217–6002.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is
effective from 5 p.m. on July 4, 2010
until 1 a.m. on July 5, 2010 unless
canceled sooner by the Captain of the
Port.
[FR Doc. 2010–14294 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
■
Dated: May 27, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound.
Safety Zones; Annual Firework
Displays Within the Captain of the
Port, Puget Sound Area of
Responsibility
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing permanent safety zones to
ensure public safety during annual
firework displays at various locations in
the Captain of the Port (COTP), Puget
Sound Area of Responsibility (AOR).
When these safety zones are activated,
and thus subject to enforcement, this
rule restricts the movement of vessels
within the established firework display
areas. This action is necessary to
prevent injury and to protect life and
property of the maritime public from the
hazards associated with firework
displays. Entry into, transit through,
mooring, or anchoring within these
zones during times of enforcement is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Puget Sound or
Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective June 15,
2010.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0063 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0063 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail Ensign Ashley M. Wanzer, USCG
Sector Seattle Waterways Management
Division, Coast Guard; telephone 206–
217–6175, e-mail
SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On February 25, 2010, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zones; Annual
Firework Displays within the Captain of
the Port, Puget Sound Area of
Responsibility in the Federal Register
(75 FR 8566). We did not receive any
comments on the proposed rule. We
also did not receive any requests for a
public meeting; therefore, a public
meeting was not held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Immediate action is necessary
to protect life, property and the
environment; therefore, a 30-day notice
is impracticable. Delaying the effective
date would be contrary to these safety
zones’ intended objective of protecting
persons and vessels involved in the
fireworks events.
Basis and Purpose
The U.S. Coast Guard is establishing
permanent safety zones to ensure public
safety during annual firework shows
occurring within the Captain of the Port,
Puget Sound, WA, AOR. This action is
necessary in order to restrict vessel
movement and reduce vessel
congregation in the proximity of
firework discharge sites ensuring
maritime public safety.
Coast Guard typically receives
numerous applications in these
geographic areas for firework displays.
Currently, temporary safety zones are
established on an emergency basis for
each individual display thereby limiting
opportunity for public comment.
Establishing permanent safety zones
through notice and comment
rulemaking provided the public the
opportunity to comment on the safety
zone locations, size and length of time
each zone will be enforced.
Additionally, this final rule includes a
variety of locations and date ranges to
allow for speedy and safe activation of
permanent safety zones. Firework
displays occur in these locations and on
these dates with regularity. The
establishment of multiple permanent
safety zones provides enhanced public
safety measures by reducing the number
of emergency safety zones needed for
firework displays. Notification of the
specific dates and time for activation of
safety zones will be available to the
maritime public.
Each year organizations sponsor
firework displays in the same general
location and time period. Each event
uses a barge, a tug and a barge, or an on-
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33696-33698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14294]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0476]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: July Firework Display in Captain of the Port, Puget
Sound AOR
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
restricting vessel movement to protect the maritime public from dangers
associated with firework display. This action is necessary to restrict
vessels from congregating in close proximity to the fireworks discharge
site during this display. Entry into, transit through or mooring within
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or Designated Representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on July 4, 2010 until 1 a.m.
on July 5, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0476 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0476 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail Ensign Ashley M. Wanzer, Sector Seattle
Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone 206-217-6175, e-mail
SectorSeattleWWM@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary in
order to restrict vessel movement and ensure maritime public safety
during this firework display.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Immediate action is necessary in
order to restrict vessel movement and ensure maritime public safety
during this firework display.
Basis and Purpose
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone in order to restrict
vessel movement in and around the fireworks discharge site. The Coast
Guard intends to promote maritime safety through this action by
ensuring a safe distance is kept from the fireworks discharge site.
Discussion of Rule
This rule will prevent vessels from entering and congregating near
the fireworks discharge site. Vessels will be directed to transit
around the zone if the on-scene patrol commander deems that it is safe
to do so.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
[[Page 33697]]
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. This rule is not a significant regulatory
action because it is minimal in size and short in duration.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
through the affected waterways during times of enforcement. This rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities for the following reasons. This safety zone is minimal
in size, short in duration and if practical then vessels will be able
to transit around the zone.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g.),
of the Instruction. This rule involves a firework display from a barge
in Port Gardner Bay, WA.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be made
[[Page 33698]]
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapters 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add temporary section 33 CFR 165.T13-147 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T13-147: Safety Zone: July Firework Display in Captain of
the Port, Puget Sound AOR.
(a) Safety Zone. The following area is a designated safety zone:
all waters of Port Gardner Bay, WA extending out to a 300 yard radius
from the launch site at 47[deg]58'51'' N 122[deg]13'16'' W.
(b) Regulations. In accordance with the general regulations in 33
CFR Part 165, Subpart C, no vessel operator may enter, transit, moor,
or anchor within this safety zone, except for vessels authorized by the
Captain of the Port or Designated Representative.
(c) Authorization. All vessel operators who desire to enter the
safety zone must obtain permission from the Captain of the Port or
Designated Representative by contacting either the on-scene patrol
craft on VHF Ch 13 or Ch 16 or the Coast Guard Sector Seattle Joint
Harbor Operations Center (JHOC) via telephone at 206-217-6002.
(d) Effective Period. This rule is effective from 5 p.m. on July 4,
2010 until 1 a.m. on July 5, 2010 unless canceled sooner by the Captain
of the Port.
Dated: May 27, 2010.
S.W. Bornemann,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2010-14294 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P