National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site, 33724-33729 [2010-14232]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 2010–14097 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–C
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1999–0013; FRL–9162–3]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Partial
Deletion of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 6 is publishing a
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
soils of Operable Unit 1 and the
underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. (MDI) Superfund Site
located in Houston, Texas (Harris
County), from the National Priorities
List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated
pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final partial deletion is being published
by EPA with the concurrence of the
State of Texas, through the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality,
because EPA has determined that all
appropriate response actions at these
identified parcels under CERCLA have
been completed. However, this partial
deletion does not preclude future
actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the
soils of Operable Unit 1 and the
underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the MDI Superfund
Site. Operable Unit 2, Operable Unit 3,
and the ground water underlying the
remainder of Operable Unit 1 will
remain on the NPL and are not being
considered for deletion as part of this
action.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion
is effective August 16, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by July 15,
2010. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final partial deletion in the
Federal Register informing the public
that the partial deletion will not take
effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1999–0013, by one of the
following methods:
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
internet on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Rafael Casanova,
casanova.rafael@epa.gov.
• Fax: 214–665–6660.
• Mail: Rafael A. Casanova; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6; Superfund Division (6SF–RA);
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200; Dallas,
Texas 75202–2733.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6; 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733; Contact: Rafael A. Casanova (214)
665–7437. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–AFUND–1999–
0013. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
ER15JN10.025
33724
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
1. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6; 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202–2733;
Hours of operation: Monday thru
Friday, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to
4 p.m. Contact: Rafael A. Casanova (214)
665–7437.
2. Blanche Kelso Bruce Music Magnet
Elementary School; 510 Jensen;
Houston, Texas 77020; Hours of
operation: Monday thru Friday, 9 a.m.
to 3:30 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rafael A. Casanova, Remedial Project
Manager; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6; Superfund Division
(6SF–RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200; Dallas, Texas 75202–2733;
telephone number: (214) 665–7437; email: casanova.rafael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
V. Partial Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 6 is publishing this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion for the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
Many Diversified Interests, Inc.
Superfund Site (Site), from the National
Priorities List (NPL). This partial
deletion pertains to the soils of Operable
Unit 1 and the underlying ground water
of the approximately 8-acre western
portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Site.
The NPL constitutes appendix B of 40
CFR part 300 which is the Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP), which EPA
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). This partial deletion of the
Many Diversified Interests, Inc.
Superfund Site is proposed in
accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and
is consistent with the Notice of Policy
Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed
on the National Priorities List. 60 FR
55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a
site deleted from the NPL remains
eligible for Fund-financed remedial
action if future conditions warrant such
actions.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, this
action will be effective August 16, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by July 15, 2010. Along with this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion, EPA is
co-publishing a Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of the Federal Register. If
adverse comments are received within
the 30-day public comment period on
this partial deletion action, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial
deletion and the partial deletion will
not take effect. EPA, will as appropriate,
prepare a response to comments and
continue with the deletion process on
the basis of the Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. There will be no
additional opportunity to comment.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the soils of Operable Unit
1 and the underlying ground water of
the approximately 8-acre western
portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many
Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund
Site and demonstrates how it meets the
deletion criteria. Section V discusses
EPA’s action to partially delete the Site
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33725
parcels from the NPL unless adverse
comments are received during the
public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c)
and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year
reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts
such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. The soils of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
ground water of the approximately 8acre western portion of Operable Unit 1
of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc.
Superfund Site will not require five-year
reviews. EPA may initiate further action
to ensure continued protectiveness at a
deleted site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate.
Whenever there is a significant release
from a site deleted from the NPL, the
deleted site may be restored to the NPL
without application of the hazard
ranking system.
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the
deletion of the soils of Operable Unit 1
and the underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site:
1. EPA has consulted with the state of
Texas prior to developing this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion and the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion copublished in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of the Federal Register.
2. EPA has provided the state 30
working days for review of this notice
and the parallel Notice of Intent for
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
33726
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Partial Deletion prior to their
publication today, and the state, through
the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality, has concurred
on this partial deletion of the Site from
the NPL.
3. Concurrently with the publication
of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion, a notice of the availability of
the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion is being published in a major
local newspaper, the Houston
Chronicle. The newspaper announces
the 30-day public comment period
concerning the Notice of Intent for
Partial Deletion of the Site from the
NPL.
4. The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the partial
deletion in the deletion docket and
made these items available for public
inspection and copying at the Site
information repositories identified
above.
5. If adverse comments are received
within the 30-day public comment
period on this partial deletion action,
EPA will publish a timely notice of
withdrawal of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion before its effective date
and will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the
deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and
the comments already received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for further response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
The following information provides
EPA’s rationale for deleting the soils of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
ground water of the approximately 8acre western portion of Operable Unit 1
of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc.
Superfund Site from the NPL. A map of
the Site, including the aerial extent of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying 8
acres of ground water proposed for
deletion, is available in the deletion
docket.
Site Location and History
The Many Diversified Interests, Inc.
Superfund Site (Site, CERCLIS ID—
TXD008083404), a former foundry
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
(Operable Unit 1), occupied a 36-acre
tract of land located at 3617 Baer Street
in Houston, Texas (Harris County). The
Site also consists of the residential areas
(off-site soils of Operable Units 2 and 3)
surrounding the former foundry.
Figures, with coordinates, of the areas to
be deleted will be made available at the
Site information repositories and
included with the deletion docket. The
Site is located approximately two miles
east of downtown Houston and one
block south of Interstate Highway 10 in
an area of mixed industrial and
residential land use. This part of
Houston is known as the ‘‘Fifth Ward.’’
The Site is bordered by Hare Street to
the north, National Vinegar Company
and Press Street to the east, the former
Texas & New Orleans railroad right-ofway to the south, and Bringhurst Street
to the west. Operable Units 2 and 3
include the residential yards and ‘‘high
access areas’’ (e.g., schools, day care
centers, playgrounds, churches, etc.)
surrounding the former foundry.
Operations at the metal casting
foundry began in 1926. The facility
primarily manufactured specialty
molded parts such as large wheels,
tracks, and mining equipment. The
process area consisted of two casting
plants. Various grades of steel,
including high carbon, chrome,
molybdenum, high nickel, and stainless
steel were cast at the facility. Scrap
metal and iron were melted in the
carbon arc furnaces, tested, corrected for
the elements needed for the different
grades of steel, and poured into molds.
Molds and cores were constructed by
mixing sand with flour binders. Castings
were cleaned (by mechanical grinding,
shot blasting, or sandblasting) and heattreated. Final machining was performed
either at the site or the customer’s shop,
if needed.
During the mid-1980s, the southern
portion of the Site was leased to CanAm Resource Group (Can-Am). Can-Am
conducted a spent catalyst recycling
operation using an experimental
process. Catalyst is a substance that
speeds up a chemical reaction to create
a desirable product, such as gasoline for
vehicles or other usable products. CanAm reportedly obtained several
thousand drums of spent catalyst from
chemical plants and refineries located
along the Houston Ship Channel and
stored them at the Site.
Site Conditions Resulting in Listing
The EPA believes that the air
emissions from the operations of the
former foundry, which contained
particles of lead, may have caused the
on-site (Operable Unit 1) and off-site
(Operable Units 2 and 3) soils to become
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
contaminated through the air deposition
of these particles. Foundry practices
may have also contributed to the on-site
lead contamination of the soils. Other
probable sources of lead contamination
that may have impacted the on- and offsite soils may include lead-based paint
and historical deposition from vehicular
lead-based fuel emissions, among other
possible sources. The leaking drums of
spent catalyst from chemical plants and
refineries, stored at the Site by Can-Am,
also caused the soils to become
contaminated, posing a threat to the
residential areas of the Site.
Operable Units
The EPA organized the Site into
Operable Units 1 (On-Site Soils and
Ground Water), 2 (Off-Site Residential
Yards and High Access Areas), and 3
(Residential Crawlspaces and Those
Residential Areas Not Addressed Under
Operable Unit 2) as discrete actions that
address the distinct geographical
portions and the different media (on-site
soils and ground water, and off-site
residential yard and crawlspace soils)
affected by the Site. The soils of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
ground water of the approximately 8acre western portion of Operable Unit 1
are the subject of this direct notice for
partial deletion.
Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and
Ground Water)
Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and
Ground Water) consists of the soils and
ground water within the fenced
boundaries of the former foundry.
In September 1998, EPA issued an
action memorandum to address the
removal of approximately 5,355
deteriorating drums of waste from the
Site and 100,000 yd3 of contaminated
on-site soils. In May 1999, EPA issued
unilateral administrative orders
directing the potentially responsible
parties to conduct a removal action to
address the drummed wastes at the Site.
The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit
1 was made available for public
comment on February 1, 2004. The
Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1,
which identified the Selected Remedy
for Operable Unit 1, was issued on July
30, 2004. In September 2006, EPA and
Clinton Gregg Investments, Ltd. (CGI)
entered into an ‘‘Agreed Order on
Consent and Covenant Not to Sue.’’ This
is the first-ever agreement in the nation
by a non-liable party to clean up a
Superfund Site. The purchaser of the
former foundry property (Operable Unit
1) agreed to implement and fund the
Selected Remedy. Partial deletion of the
soils of Operable Unit 1 and the
underlying ground water of the
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Site was
requested by CGI to facilitate the
residential development of the Site.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential
Yards and High Access Areas)
Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential
Yards and High Access Areas) consists
of the residential yards and high access
areas surrounding the fenced
boundaries of the former foundry
(Operable Unit 1). In 1998, the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (now the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality)
performed a removal action that
addressed 89 residential yards,
contaminated with lead, in the vicinity
of the Site. In November 2003 and June
2005, EPA completed removal actions at
59 residential yards and high access
areas, which included the Blanche
Kelso Bruce Elementary School, Fifth
Ward Multi-Service Center, and several
churches. The purpose of these removal
actions was to remove surface soil with
concentrations of lead that equaled or
exceeded the cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg
to reduce the exposure of children and
adults to lead. EPA believes that these
removal actions addressed all of the
residential yards and High Access Areas
that could have been affected by the air
emissions of particulates containing
lead from the former foundry and for
which access was granted for sampling.
The ground water medium was not a
component of the investigation for
Operable Unit 2. The Proposed Plan for
Operable Unit 2 was made available for
public comment on July 28, 2005. The
Record of Decision for Operable Unit 2,
which identified the Selected Remedy
for Operable Unit 2, was issued on
September 23, 2005. The Selected
Remedy for Operable Unit 2 was ‘‘no
further action’’ since the previous
removal actions eliminated the existing
and potential risks to human health and
the environment so that no further
action was necessary. Operable Unit 2 is
not being considered for partial deletion
at this time and is not discussed further
in this direct notice of partial deletion.
Operable Unit 3 (Residential
Crawlspaces and Those Residential
Areas Not Addressed Under Operable
Unit 2)
Operable Unit 3 (Off-Site Residential
Crawlspaces and Those Residential
Areas Not Addressed Under Operable
Unit 2) consists of the residential
crawlspaces and yards surrounding the
fenced boundaries of the former foundry
(Operable Unit 1) which were not
addressed under Operable Unit 2
because the owners could not be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
located, or they were not responsive to
the EPA’s request for sampling, or they
denied the EPA access for sampling.
In April 2006 and 2009, the EPA
completed removal actions at the
northeastern portion of the Kelly Village
Housing Complex and six (6) additional
residential yards of the Site,
respectively. The purpose of these
removal actions was to remove surface
soil with concentrations of lead that
equaled or exceeded the cleanup goal of
500 mg/kg to reduce the exposure of
children and adults to lead. EPA
believes that these removal actions
addressed all of the Kelly Village areas
and surrounding residential yards
which could have been affected by the
air emissions of particulates containing
lead from the former foundry and for
which the EPA was granted access for
sampling.
The ground water medium was not a
component of the investigation for
Operable Unit 3. The Proposed Plan for
Operable Unit 3 was made available for
public comment in June 2009. The
Record of Decision for Operable Unit 3,
which identified the Selected Remedy
for Operable Unit 3, was issued on
August 31, 2009. The Selected Remedy
for Operable Unit 3 crawlspaces was ‘‘no
action warranted’’ since the Baseline
Human Health Risk Assessment
concluded that current or potential
future Site conditions pose no
unacceptable risks to human health or
to the environment so that no action is
warranted. The Selected Remedy
Operable Unit 3 residential yards was
‘‘no further action’’ since the previous
removal actions eliminated the existing
and potential risks to human health and
the environment so that no further
action was necessary. Operable Unit 3 is
not being considered for partial deletion
at this time and is not discussed further
in this direct notice of partial deletion.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility
Study for Operable Unit 1
The remedial investigation for
Operable Unit 1 addressed the following
key issues in order to determine the
nature and extent of contamination at
the Site:
• Determine the distribution of metal
concentrations in near-surface soils
(specifically lead deposited as a result of
air dispersion and deposition of
emissions from the former foundry),
• Determine the nature and extent of
contaminants of potential concern in
soils associated with the historic
foundry operations at the Site, and
• Determine the nature and extent of
contamination in ground water at the
Site (Operable Unit 1).
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33727
The contaminant found above riskbased levels in the soils included lead.
The contaminants found above riskbased levels in the ground water
included benzo(a)pyrene, total
petroleum hydrocarbons, manganese,
and molybdenum. A total of five
alternatives were developed for the Site
during the feasibility study for Operable
Unit 1. The EPA chose stabilization/
solidification of lead-contaminated soils
with off-site disposal, source removal
and monitored natural attenuation for
the ground water, and the placement of
institutional controls for both the soils
and ground water as the Selected
Remedy for the Site.
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1
The major components of the Selected
Remedy described in the Record of
Decision for Operable Unit 1 (On-Site
Soils and Ground Water) for the Site
consisted of:
• Excavation and Treatment
(solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600
cubic yards (yd3) of soils with lead
concentrations equal to or greater than
500 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to
a maximum depth of 1.5 feet below
ground surface (bgs), and approximately
3,000 yd3 of soils stockpiled at the Site
from a previous removal action were
also treated, if necessary. Transportation
and Disposal (at a permitted off-site
waste disposal facility) of the treated
and untreated soils;
• Transportation and Disposal (at a
permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of approximately 31,621 yd3 of
debris (nonhazardous debris, foundry
sand, and slag), the Asbestos-Containing
Material in the on-site building and
scattered throughout the Site, and an
Underground Storage Tank in the
vicinity of Monitoring Well (MW) 20;
• Excavation and Disposal (at a
permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of approximately 2,100 yd3 of
soils contaminated with benzo(a)pyrene,
or other organics, at the MW–3 location;
light nonaqueous-phase liquids at the
MW–11 location; and Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons at the MW–20 location.
Soil cleanup levels for these isolated
source areas were determined during
the remedial design and remedial action
for the Selected Remedy;
• Implementation of Monitored
Natural Attenuation for the ground
water, which included source removal
and Long-Term Monitoring for the
ground water to ensure that constituents
(total petroleum hydrocarbons and
benzo[a]pyrene) above cleanup goals are
naturally attenuating; and
• Implementation of Institutional
Controls for both the soils and ground
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
33728
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
water to prevent exposure to soil
contamination above acceptable cleanup
levels and to prevent exposure to
contaminated ground water in the
shallow water-bearing zone.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Remedial Action Objectives for
Operable Unit 1
The Remedial Action Objectives
accomplished for Operable Unit 1 of the
Site were:
• Remove the asbestos-containing
material stockpiled on the Site and left
in the existing building,
• Reduce the risk posed to residential
receptors by lead concentrations in the
soils equal to or greater than the cleanup
goal for the Site (500 mg/kg),
• Remove soil visibly contaminated
with waste oil in the vicinity of MW–
3 and MW–20 that was acting as a
potential continuing source of ground
water contamination,
• Remove soil visibly contaminated
with waste oil in the vicinity of MW–
11 that has the potential to act as a
source of ground water contamination,
• Remediate ground water in the
northwest corner of the Site, at MW–20,
and remove the free product associated
with an underground storage tank, and
• Mitigate the threat posed by
exposure to ground water throughout
the rest of the Site.
The basis for the Remedial Action
Objectives for the Operable Unit 1 soil
was to cleanup the Site to residential
standards, the anticipated future land
use for the fenced boundaries of the
Site. The basis for the Remedial Action
Objectives for the ground water was to
ensure that current and future receptors
are not exposed to contaminated ground
water during the implementation of the
Selected Remedy.
Response Actions for Operable Unit 1
The remedial design for Operable
Unit 1 included the following design
determinations:
• Defining the lead removal and
sampling techniques (including
confirmation sampling);
• Detailing a lead-impacted soil
treatment process;
• Determining source removal criteria
for light nonaqueous phase liquidimpacted areas,
• Defining the disposal/sampling
needs for each waste stream, and
• Defining the monitoring wells for
the monitored natural attenuation
program.
The remedial action for Operable Unit
1 included:
• Demolition and disposal of an
abandoned 2-story office building, and
several 1-story utility structures;
• Transportation and disposal of the
asbestos-containing material in the on-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
site building and scattered throughout
the Site;
• Transportation and disposal (at a
permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of approximately 31,621 yd3 of
debris (non-hazardous debris, foundry
sand, and slag) and the asbestoscontaining material in the on-site
building and scattered throughout the
Site;
• Removal and disposal of an
electrical transformer, and underground
storage tank in the vicinity of MW–20
and Lead Area 1, and the management
and disposal of foundry bag filters
identified as a listed K061 waste
material;
• Excavation and treatment
(solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600 yd3
of soils with lead concentrations equal
to or greater than 500 mg/kg to a
maximum depth of 1.5 feet bgs and
approximately 3,000 yd3 of soils
stockpiled at the Site from a previous
removal action, and transportation and
disposal (at a permitted off-site wastes
disposal facility) of the treated and
untreated soils;
• Excavation and disposal (at a
permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of approximately 2,100 yd3 of
soils contaminated with benzo(a)pyrene,
or other organics, at the MW–11
location, and total petroleum
hydrocarbons at the MW–20 location;
• Confirmation sampling for several
locations identified to have been
impacted by either semi-volatile organic
compounds or polychlorinated
biphenyls in the soils; and lead
confirmation sampling for the Site soils;
• Installation of additional
monitoring wells to be utilized during
the monitored natural attenuation
program.
Cleanup Goals for Operable Unit 1
Soil remedial action activities were
conducted at Operable Unit 1 from May
2007 through June 2008. The soil
remedial action for Operable Unit 1 of
the Site consisted of the sampling and
excavation, including the proper
disposal, of the soils contaminated with
lead equal to or greater than the 500 mg/
kg residential soil lead cleanup level
specified in the Record of Decision for
Operable Unit 1. The soil remedial
action also consisted of the sampling
and excavation of soils contaminated
with total petroleum hydrocarbons and
other organics identified in the Record
of Decision for Operable Unit 1.
Confirmation sampling was also
conducted to verify that this area did
not contain soil with lead or organic
concentrations (total petroleum
hydrocarbons, benzo(a)pyrene, and
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
polychlorinated biphenyls) equal to or
greater than the cleanup level.
Institutional controls were not required
for the soils since sampling indicated
that soil lead concentrations did not
exceed the cleanup level below 1.5 feet
bgs. Sampling data gathered from the
ground water monitoring wells located
in the approximately 8-acre western
portion of Operable Unit 1 indicated
that the underlying ground water had
not been impacted by the hazardous
substances identified in the Selected
Remedy for Operable Unit 1 of the Site.
The ground water flows to the east
southeast at this portion of the Site and
the contaminants are not expected to
contaminate the ground water
underlying the 8-acre western portion of
the Site. Therefore, EPA determined that
the ground water underlying the
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 would not require
institutional controls.
The EPA conducted pre-final and
final construction inspections for
Operable Unit 1 on June 25, 2008, and
determined that CGI completed the
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 in
accordance with the remedial design
plans and specifications, the remedial
action sampling and analysis plan, the
Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1,
and the Agreed Order on Consent. The
EPA approved the ‘‘Final Soil Remedial
Action Report’’ (dated 08/29/08) on
December 12, 2008, and issued a final
certification of completion of the soil
remedial action on August 19, 2009.
Since all the contaminants were
remediated in the Operable Unit 1 soils,
and monitoring data indicated that the
ground water underlying the 8-acre
western portion of the Site was not
contaminated, no operation and
maintenance, monitoring, or five-year
reviews are required.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have
been satisfied as required in CERCLA
Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k) and
CERCLA Section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617.
Documents in the partial deletion
docket which the EPA relied on for
recommendation for the partial deletion
from the NPL are available to the public
in the information repositories, and a
notice of availability of the Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion has been
published in the Houston Chronicle to
satisfy public participation procedures
required by 40 CFR 300.425(e)(4).
Determination That the Criteria for
Deletion Have Been Met
In accordance with 40 CFR
300.425(e), sites may be deleted from
the NPL where no further response is
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
33729
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 15, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
appropriate. The EPA, in consultation
with the State of Texas (through the
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality), has determined that the
potentially responsible parties have
completed the removal action for
Operable Unit 1 according to the May
1999 ‘‘Unilateral Administrative Order,’’
and that Clinton Gregg Investments, Ltd.
has completed the soil remedial action
for Operable Unit 1 according to the July
2004 ‘‘Record of Decision’’ and the
September 2006 ‘‘Agreed Order on
Consent and Covenant Not to Sue.’’
Additionally, EPA completed the
removal action at Operable Unit 1
according to the September 1998
‘‘Action Memorandum.’’
V. Partial Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the
State of Texas, through the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality,
has determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA have
been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site from the
NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to
be noncontroversial and routine, EPA is
taking it without prior publication. This
action will be effective August 16, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments
by July 15, 2010. If adverse comments
are received within the 30-day public
comment period, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final
notice of partial deletion before the
effective date of the partial deletion and
it will not take effect. EPA will prepare
a response to comments and continue
with the deletion process on the basis of
the notice of intent to partially delete
and the comments already received.
There will be no additional opportunity
to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
waste, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: June 4, 2010.
Lawerence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
For the reasons set out in this
document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended
as follows:
■
PART 300—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 300
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR,
1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923;
3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B—[Amended]
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300
is amended by revising the entry under
‘‘Many Diversified Interests, Inc., Texas’’
to read as follows:
■
Appendix B to Part 300—National
Priorities List
TABLE 1—GENERAL SUPERFUND SECTION
State
Site name
*
TX .....................
*
*
*
*
*
Many Diversified Interests, Inc ........................................................................................................
Notes
(a)
City/county
Houston ............
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
P
*
(a) * * *
* P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. 2010–14232 Filed 6–14–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 27
[WT Docket No. 03–66; RM–10586; FCC 10–
107]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with RULES
Facilitating the Provision of Fixed and
Mobile Broadband Access,
Educational and Other Advanced
Services in the 2150–2162 and 2500–
2690 MHz Bands
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission modifies the construction
deadline applicable to new initial
Broadband Radio Service (BRS) licenses
granted on or after November 6, 2009.
Specifically, the Commission permits
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:10 Jun 14, 2010
Jkt 220001
these BRS licensees to demonstrate
substantial service four years from the
date of license grant rather than on or
before May 1, 2011. The Commission
further modifies the construction rule
by clarifying that BRS and Educational
Broadband Service (EBS) licensees may
demonstrate substantial service by
meeting one of the safe harbors
specified in the rule and that they may,
under certain circumstances,
demonstrate substantial service by
combining licenses. Finally, on its own
motion, the Commission corrects a
clerical error in its rules governing the
pre-transition frequency assignments for
BRS Channel 1. These actions clarify the
requirements necessary for BRS and
EBS licensees to demonstrate
substantial service and ensure that BRS
licensees of new initial licenses are
given a reasonable period of time to
deploy service, while ensuring that
spectrum is rapidly placed in use.
DATES:
PO 00000
Effective July 15, 2010.
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy M. Zaczek, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau,
Broadband Division, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554, at
(202) 418–0274 or via the Internet to
Nancy.Zaczek@fcc.gov.
This is a
summary of the Commission’s
Broadband Radio Service/Educational
Broadband Service Third Report and
Order (BRS/EBS 3rd R&O), FCC 10–107,
adopted on June 1, 2010, and released
on June 3, 2010. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Information Center, Room CY–A257,
445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20554. The complete text may be
purchased from the Commission’s
duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), Portals II, 445 12th
Street, SW., Room CY–B402,
Washington, DC 20554, (202) 488–5300
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15JNR1.SGM
15JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 15, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33724-33729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14232]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1999-0013; FRL-9162-3]
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 is
publishing a direct final Notice of Deletion of the soils of Operable
Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre
western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests,
Inc. (MDI) Superfund Site located in Houston, Texas (Harris County),
from the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, promulgated pursuant
to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an
appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct final partial deletion is being
published by EPA with the concurrence of the State of Texas, through
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, because EPA has
determined that all appropriate response actions at these identified
parcels under CERCLA have been completed. However, this partial
deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund.
This partial deletion pertains to the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion
of Operable Unit 1 of the MDI Superfund Site. Operable Unit 2, Operable
Unit 3, and the ground water underlying the remainder of Operable Unit
1 will remain on the NPL and are not being considered for deletion as
part of this action.
DATES: This direct final partial deletion is effective August 16, 2010
unless EPA receives adverse comments by July 15, 2010. If adverse
comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the Federal Register informing the
public that the partial deletion will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1999-0013, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow internet on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Rafael Casanova, casanova.rafael@epa.gov.
Fax: 214-665-6660.
Mail: Rafael A. Casanova; U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 6; Superfund Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite
1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 6; 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733;
Contact: Rafael A. Casanova (214) 665-7437. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-AFUND-
1999-0013. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is
[[Page 33725]]
an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700; Dallas, Texas 75202-2733; Hours of operation: Monday
thru Friday, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Contact: Rafael A.
Casanova (214) 665-7437.
2. Blanche Kelso Bruce Music Magnet Elementary School; 510 Jensen;
Houston, Texas 77020; Hours of operation: Monday thru Friday, 9 a.m. to
3:30 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rafael A. Casanova, Remedial Project
Manager; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6; Superfund
Division (6SF-RA); 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200; Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733; telephone number: (214) 665-7437; e-mail:
casanova.rafael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
V. Partial Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region 6 is publishing this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion for the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
(Site), from the National Priorities List (NPL). This partial deletion
pertains to the soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground
water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of
the Site. The NPL constitutes appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which is
the Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP),
which EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that
appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial
deletion of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site is
proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with
the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the
National Priorities List. 60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future conditions
warrant such actions.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, this action will be effective August 16, 2010 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by July 15, 2010. Along with this direct
final Notice of Partial Deletion, EPA is co-publishing a Notice of
Intent for Partial Deletion in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of the
Federal Register. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish
a timely withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion
before the effective date of the partial deletion and the partial
deletion will not take effect. EPA, will as appropriate, prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV discusses the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion
of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund
Site and demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria. Section V
discusses EPA's action to partially delete the Site parcels from the
NPL unless adverse comments are received during the public comment
period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. The soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground
water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of
the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site will not require
five-year reviews. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the deletion of the soils of
Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the approximately 8-
acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified
Interests, Inc. Superfund Site:
1. EPA has consulted with the state of Texas prior to developing
this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice of Intent
for Partial Deletion co-published in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
the Federal Register.
2. EPA has provided the state 30 working days for review of this
notice and the parallel Notice of Intent for
[[Page 33726]]
Partial Deletion prior to their publication today, and the state,
through the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, has concurred on
this partial deletion of the Site from the NPL.
3. Concurrently with the publication of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion is being published in a major local
newspaper, the Houston Chronicle. The newspaper announces the 30-day
public comment period concerning the Notice of Intent for Partial
Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
4. The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the partial
deletion in the deletion docket and made these items available for
public inspection and copying at the Site information repositories
identified above.
5. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion before its effective date and will prepare a response to
comments and continue with the deletion process on the basis of the
Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the comments already
received.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for further
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying ground water of the
approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Many
Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site from the NPL. A map of the
Site, including the aerial extent of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
8 acres of ground water proposed for deletion, is available in the
deletion docket.
Site Location and History
The Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site (Site, CERCLIS
ID--TXD008083404), a former foundry (Operable Unit 1), occupied a 36-
acre tract of land located at 3617 Baer Street in Houston, Texas
(Harris County). The Site also consists of the residential areas (off-
site soils of Operable Units 2 and 3) surrounding the former foundry.
Figures, with coordinates, of the areas to be deleted will be made
available at the Site information repositories and included with the
deletion docket. The Site is located approximately two miles east of
downtown Houston and one block south of Interstate Highway 10 in an
area of mixed industrial and residential land use. This part of Houston
is known as the ``Fifth Ward.'' The Site is bordered by Hare Street to
the north, National Vinegar Company and Press Street to the east, the
former Texas & New Orleans railroad right-of-way to the south, and
Bringhurst Street to the west. Operable Units 2 and 3 include the
residential yards and ``high access areas'' (e.g., schools, day care
centers, playgrounds, churches, etc.) surrounding the former foundry.
Operations at the metal casting foundry began in 1926. The facility
primarily manufactured specialty molded parts such as large wheels,
tracks, and mining equipment. The process area consisted of two casting
plants. Various grades of steel, including high carbon, chrome,
molybdenum, high nickel, and stainless steel were cast at the facility.
Scrap metal and iron were melted in the carbon arc furnaces, tested,
corrected for the elements needed for the different grades of steel,
and poured into molds. Molds and cores were constructed by mixing sand
with flour binders. Castings were cleaned (by mechanical grinding, shot
blasting, or sandblasting) and heat-treated. Final machining was
performed either at the site or the customer's shop, if needed.
During the mid-1980s, the southern portion of the Site was leased
to Can-Am Resource Group (Can-Am). Can-Am conducted a spent catalyst
recycling operation using an experimental process. Catalyst is a
substance that speeds up a chemical reaction to create a desirable
product, such as gasoline for vehicles or other usable products. Can-Am
reportedly obtained several thousand drums of spent catalyst from
chemical plants and refineries located along the Houston Ship Channel
and stored them at the Site.
Site Conditions Resulting in Listing
The EPA believes that the air emissions from the operations of the
former foundry, which contained particles of lead, may have caused the
on-site (Operable Unit 1) and off-site (Operable Units 2 and 3) soils
to become contaminated through the air deposition of these particles.
Foundry practices may have also contributed to the on-site lead
contamination of the soils. Other probable sources of lead
contamination that may have impacted the on- and off-site soils may
include lead-based paint and historical deposition from vehicular lead-
based fuel emissions, among other possible sources. The leaking drums
of spent catalyst from chemical plants and refineries, stored at the
Site by Can-Am, also caused the soils to become contaminated, posing a
threat to the residential areas of the Site.
Operable Units
The EPA organized the Site into Operable Units 1 (On-Site Soils and
Ground Water), 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas),
and 3 (Residential Crawlspaces and Those Residential Areas Not
Addressed Under Operable Unit 2) as discrete actions that address the
distinct geographical portions and the different media (on-site soils
and ground water, and off-site residential yard and crawlspace soils)
affected by the Site. The soils of Operable Unit 1 and the underlying
ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable
Unit 1 are the subject of this direct notice for partial deletion.
Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water)
Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water) consists of the
soils and ground water within the fenced boundaries of the former
foundry.
In September 1998, EPA issued an action memorandum to address the
removal of approximately 5,355 deteriorating drums of waste from the
Site and 100,000 yd\3\ of contaminated on-site soils. In May 1999, EPA
issued unilateral administrative orders directing the potentially
responsible parties to conduct a removal action to address the drummed
wastes at the Site.
The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 1 was made available for public
comment on February 1, 2004. The Record of Decision for Operable Unit
1, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1, was issued
on July 30, 2004. In September 2006, EPA and Clinton Gregg Investments,
Ltd. (CGI) entered into an ``Agreed Order on Consent and Covenant Not
to Sue.'' This is the first-ever agreement in the nation by a non-
liable party to clean up a Superfund Site. The purchaser of the former
foundry property (Operable Unit 1) agreed to implement and fund the
Selected Remedy. Partial deletion of the soils of Operable Unit 1 and
the underlying ground water of the
[[Page 33727]]
approximately 8-acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 of the Site was
requested by CGI to facilitate the residential development of the Site.
Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas)
Operable Unit 2 (Off-Site Residential Yards and High Access Areas)
consists of the residential yards and high access areas surrounding the
fenced boundaries of the former foundry (Operable Unit 1). In 1998, the
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (now the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality) performed a removal action that
addressed 89 residential yards, contaminated with lead, in the vicinity
of the Site. In November 2003 and June 2005, EPA completed removal
actions at 59 residential yards and high access areas, which included
the Blanche Kelso Bruce Elementary School, Fifth Ward Multi-Service
Center, and several churches. The purpose of these removal actions was
to remove surface soil with concentrations of lead that equaled or
exceeded the cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg to reduce the exposure of
children and adults to lead. EPA believes that these removal actions
addressed all of the residential yards and High Access Areas that could
have been affected by the air emissions of particulates containing lead
from the former foundry and for which access was granted for sampling.
The ground water medium was not a component of the investigation
for Operable Unit 2. The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 2 was made
available for public comment on July 28, 2005. The Record of Decision
for Operable Unit 2, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable
Unit 2, was issued on September 23, 2005. The Selected Remedy for
Operable Unit 2 was ``no further action'' since the previous removal
actions eliminated the existing and potential risks to human health and
the environment so that no further action was necessary. Operable Unit
2 is not being considered for partial deletion at this time and is not
discussed further in this direct notice of partial deletion.
Operable Unit 3 (Residential Crawlspaces and Those Residential Areas
Not Addressed Under Operable Unit 2)
Operable Unit 3 (Off-Site Residential Crawlspaces and Those
Residential Areas Not Addressed Under Operable Unit 2) consists of the
residential crawlspaces and yards surrounding the fenced boundaries of
the former foundry (Operable Unit 1) which were not addressed under
Operable Unit 2 because the owners could not be located, or they were
not responsive to the EPA's request for sampling, or they denied the
EPA access for sampling.
In April 2006 and 2009, the EPA completed removal actions at the
northeastern portion of the Kelly Village Housing Complex and six (6)
additional residential yards of the Site, respectively. The purpose of
these removal actions was to remove surface soil with concentrations of
lead that equaled or exceeded the cleanup goal of 500 mg/kg to reduce
the exposure of children and adults to lead. EPA believes that these
removal actions addressed all of the Kelly Village areas and
surrounding residential yards which could have been affected by the air
emissions of particulates containing lead from the former foundry and
for which the EPA was granted access for sampling.
The ground water medium was not a component of the investigation
for Operable Unit 3. The Proposed Plan for Operable Unit 3 was made
available for public comment in June 2009. The Record of Decision for
Operable Unit 3, which identified the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit
3, was issued on August 31, 2009. The Selected Remedy for Operable Unit
3 crawlspaces was ``no action warranted'' since the Baseline Human
Health Risk Assessment concluded that current or potential future Site
conditions pose no unacceptable risks to human health or to the
environment so that no action is warranted. The Selected Remedy
Operable Unit 3 residential yards was ``no further action'' since the
previous removal actions eliminated the existing and potential risks to
human health and the environment so that no further action was
necessary. Operable Unit 3 is not being considered for partial deletion
at this time and is not discussed further in this direct notice of
partial deletion.
Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study for Operable Unit 1
The remedial investigation for Operable Unit 1 addressed the
following key issues in order to determine the nature and extent of
contamination at the Site:
Determine the distribution of metal concentrations in
near-surface soils (specifically lead deposited as a result of air
dispersion and deposition of emissions from the former foundry),
Determine the nature and extent of contaminants of
potential concern in soils associated with the historic foundry
operations at the Site, and
Determine the nature and extent of contamination in ground
water at the Site (Operable Unit 1).
The contaminant found above risk-based levels in the soils included
lead. The contaminants found above risk-based levels in the ground
water included benzo(a)pyrene, total petroleum hydrocarbons, manganese,
and molybdenum. A total of five alternatives were developed for the
Site during the feasibility study for Operable Unit 1. The EPA chose
stabilization/solidification of lead-contaminated soils with off-site
disposal, source removal and monitored natural attenuation for the
ground water, and the placement of institutional controls for both the
soils and ground water as the Selected Remedy for the Site.
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1
The major components of the Selected Remedy described in the Record
of Decision for Operable Unit 1 (On-Site Soils and Ground Water) for
the Site consisted of:
Excavation and Treatment (solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600 cubic yards (yd\3\) of soils with
lead concentrations equal to or greater than 500 milligrams per
kilogram (mg/kg) to a maximum depth of 1.5 feet below ground surface
(bgs), and approximately 3,000 yd\3\ of soils stockpiled at the Site
from a previous removal action were also treated, if necessary.
Transportation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste disposal
facility) of the treated and untreated soils;
Transportation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 31,621 yd\3\ of debris
(nonhazardous debris, foundry sand, and slag), the Asbestos-Containing
Material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site, and
an Underground Storage Tank in the vicinity of Monitoring Well (MW) 20;
Excavation and Disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 2,100 yd\3\ of soils contaminated
with benzo(a)pyrene, or other organics, at the MW-3 location; light
nonaqueous-phase liquids at the MW-11 location; and Total Petroleum
Hydrocarbons at the MW-20 location. Soil cleanup levels for these
isolated source areas were determined during the remedial design and
remedial action for the Selected Remedy;
Implementation of Monitored Natural Attenuation for the
ground water, which included source removal and Long-Term Monitoring
for the ground water to ensure that constituents (total petroleum
hydrocarbons and benzo[a]pyrene) above cleanup goals are naturally
attenuating; and
Implementation of Institutional Controls for both the
soils and ground
[[Page 33728]]
water to prevent exposure to soil contamination above acceptable
cleanup levels and to prevent exposure to contaminated ground water in
the shallow water-bearing zone.
Remedial Action Objectives for Operable Unit 1
The Remedial Action Objectives accomplished for Operable Unit 1 of
the Site were:
Remove the asbestos-containing material stockpiled on the
Site and left in the existing building,
Reduce the risk posed to residential receptors by lead
concentrations in the soils equal to or greater than the cleanup goal
for the Site (500 mg/kg),
Remove soil visibly contaminated with waste oil in the
vicinity of MW-3 and MW-20 that was acting as a potential continuing
source of ground water contamination,
Remove soil visibly contaminated with waste oil in the
vicinity of MW-11 that has the potential to act as a source of ground
water contamination,
Remediate ground water in the northwest corner of the
Site, at MW-20, and remove the free product associated with an
underground storage tank, and
Mitigate the threat posed by exposure to ground water
throughout the rest of the Site.
The basis for the Remedial Action Objectives for the Operable Unit 1
soil was to cleanup the Site to residential standards, the anticipated
future land use for the fenced boundaries of the Site. The basis for
the Remedial Action Objectives for the ground water was to ensure that
current and future receptors are not exposed to contaminated ground
water during the implementation of the Selected Remedy.
Response Actions for Operable Unit 1
The remedial design for Operable Unit 1 included the following
design determinations:
Defining the lead removal and sampling techniques
(including confirmation sampling);
Detailing a lead-impacted soil treatment process;
Determining source removal criteria for light nonaqueous
phase liquid-impacted areas,
Defining the disposal/sampling needs for each waste
stream, and
Defining the monitoring wells for the monitored natural
attenuation program.
The remedial action for Operable Unit 1 included:
Demolition and disposal of an abandoned 2-story office
building, and several 1-story utility structures;
Transportation and disposal of the asbestos-containing
material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site;
Transportation and disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 31,621 yd\3\ of debris (non-
hazardous debris, foundry sand, and slag) and the asbestos-containing
material in the on-site building and scattered throughout the Site;
Removal and disposal of an electrical transformer, and
underground storage tank in the vicinity of MW-20 and Lead Area 1, and
the management and disposal of foundry bag filters identified as a
listed K061 waste material;
Excavation and treatment (solidification/stabilization, if
necessary) of approximately 13,600 yd\3\ of soils with lead
concentrations equal to or greater than 500 mg/kg to a maximum depth of
1.5 feet bgs and approximately 3,000 yd\3\ of soils stockpiled at the
Site from a previous removal action, and transportation and disposal
(at a permitted off-site wastes disposal facility) of the treated and
untreated soils;
Excavation and disposal (at a permitted off-site waste
disposal facility) of approximately 2,100 yd\3\ of soils contaminated
with benzo(a)pyrene, or other organics, at the MW-11 location, and
total petroleum hydrocarbons at the MW-20 location;
Confirmation sampling for several locations identified to
have been impacted by either semi-volatile organic compounds or
polychlorinated biphenyls in the soils; and lead confirmation sampling
for the Site soils;
Installation of additional monitoring wells to be utilized
during the monitored natural attenuation program.
Cleanup Goals for Operable Unit 1
Soil remedial action activities were conducted at Operable Unit 1
from May 2007 through June 2008. The soil remedial action for Operable
Unit 1 of the Site consisted of the sampling and excavation, including
the proper disposal, of the soils contaminated with lead equal to or
greater than the 500 mg/kg residential soil lead cleanup level
specified in the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1. The soil
remedial action also consisted of the sampling and excavation of soils
contaminated with total petroleum hydrocarbons and other organics
identified in the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1. Confirmation
sampling was also conducted to verify that this area did not contain
soil with lead or organic concentrations (total petroleum hydrocarbons,
benzo(a)pyrene, and polychlorinated biphenyls) equal to or greater than
the cleanup level. Institutional controls were not required for the
soils since sampling indicated that soil lead concentrations did not
exceed the cleanup level below 1.5 feet bgs. Sampling data gathered
from the ground water monitoring wells located in the approximately 8-
acre western portion of Operable Unit 1 indicated that the underlying
ground water had not been impacted by the hazardous substances
identified in the Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 of the Site. The
ground water flows to the east southeast at this portion of the Site
and the contaminants are not expected to contaminate the ground water
underlying the 8-acre western portion of the Site. Therefore, EPA
determined that the ground water underlying the approximately 8-acre
western portion of Operable Unit 1 would not require institutional
controls.
The EPA conducted pre-final and final construction inspections for
Operable Unit 1 on June 25, 2008, and determined that CGI completed the
Selected Remedy for Operable Unit 1 in accordance with the remedial
design plans and specifications, the remedial action sampling and
analysis plan, the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 1, and the
Agreed Order on Consent. The EPA approved the ``Final Soil Remedial
Action Report'' (dated 08/29/08) on December 12, 2008, and issued a
final certification of completion of the soil remedial action on August
19, 2009.
Since all the contaminants were remediated in the Operable Unit 1
soils, and monitoring data indicated that the ground water underlying
the 8-acre western portion of the Site was not contaminated, no
operation and maintenance, monitoring, or five-year reviews are
required.
Community Involvement
Public participation activities have been satisfied as required in
CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k) and CERCLA Section 117, 42
U.S.C. 9617. Documents in the partial deletion docket which the EPA
relied on for recommendation for the partial deletion from the NPL are
available to the public in the information repositories, and a notice
of availability of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion has been
published in the Houston Chronicle to satisfy public participation
procedures required by 40 CFR 300.425(e)(4).
Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Have Been Met
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is
[[Page 33729]]
appropriate. The EPA, in consultation with the State of Texas (through
the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), has determined that the
potentially responsible parties have completed the removal action for
Operable Unit 1 according to the May 1999 ``Unilateral Administrative
Order,'' and that Clinton Gregg Investments, Ltd. has completed the
soil remedial action for Operable Unit 1 according to the July 2004
``Record of Decision'' and the September 2006 ``Agreed Order on Consent
and Covenant Not to Sue.'' Additionally, EPA completed the removal
action at Operable Unit 1 according to the September 1998 ``Action
Memorandum.''
V. Partial Deletion Action
The EPA, with concurrence of the State of Texas, through the Texas
Commission on Environmental Quality, has determined that all
appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed.
Therefore, EPA is deleting the soils of Operable Unit 1 and the
underlying ground water of the approximately 8-acre western portion of
Operable Unit 1 of the Many Diversified Interests, Inc. Superfund Site
from the NPL.
Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective August 16, 2010 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
July 15, 2010. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final notice of partial deletion before the effective date of
the partial deletion and it will not take effect. EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the notice of intent to partially delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Dated: June 4, 2010.
Lawerence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended as
follows:
PART 300--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Appendix B--[Amended]
0
2. Table 1 of Appendix B to Part 300 is amended by revising the entry
under ``Many Diversified Interests, Inc., Texas'' to read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List
Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Site name City/county Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
TX........................... Many Diversified Interests, Houston...................... P
Inc.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) * * *
* P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
[FR Doc. 2010-14232 Filed 6-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P