Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Application for an Exemption From the Flatbed Carrier Safety Group, 33667-33669 [2010-14224]
Download as PDF
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 113 / Monday, June 14, 2010 / Notices
three of these safety systems—forward
collision waning systems, roll stability
control systems, and lane departure
warning systems, on its newly
purchased power units. From a supplier
perspective, both Takata and Iteris
would like to ensure that motor carriers
are able to utilize the safety systems that
they manufacture, to enhance highway
safety, while maintaining compliance
with the applicable FMCSRs.
The applicants note that the lane
departure warning system requires, as a
necessary element, a lane departure
warning sensor to be installed to the
inside of the tractor windshield. For the
warning sensor to be effective, it must
be mounted inside the area swept by the
windshield to insure maximum
visibility.
The applicants state that over the last
several years, truck manufacturers have
increased the windshield area to
maximize driver visibility. As a result,
manufacturers have voluntarily
installed larger windshield wipers on
these windshields that increase the
swept area beyond that which is
minimally required by Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
104, ‘‘Windshield Wiping and Washing
Systems.’’ FMVSS No. 104 establishes
the requirements applicable to vehicle
and equipment manufacturers for
windshield wiper system coverage for
passenger cars, multi-purpose passenger
vehicles, trucks and buses.
In the exemption applications, the
applicants provided diagrams and
photos showing the sensor dimensions
and mounting location on the
windshield. Specifically, the sensor
device itself measures 2 inches by 3.5
inches, and it is mounted approximately
2 inches below the top of the
windshield—within the 6-inch limit
specified in 49 CFR 393.60(e)(1). The
applicants state that this mounting
position does not adversely impact the
driver’s visibility.
In support of the exemption
applications, each applicant cited the
findings of a report published by
FMCSA’s Office of Analysis, Research
and Technology titled ‘‘Benefit-Cost
Analyses of Onboard Safety Systems,’’
that summarizes the projected safety
benefits for various CMV onboard safety
systems, including lane departure
warning systems. Using low and high
estimates of efficacy rates ranging from
23 percent to 53 percent, the report
estimated that, based on industry-wide
use of lane departure warning systems,
these systems have the potential to
reduce approximately 1,609–2,463
single-vehicle roadway departure
collisions, 627–1,307 single-vehicle
roadway departure rollovers, 1,111–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jun 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
2,223 same-direction lane departure
sideswipes, 997–1,992 oppositedirection lane departure sideswipes,
and 59–118 opposite-direction lane
departure head-on collisions. The
applicants state that without the
exemption, motor carriers will be
unable to (1) implement the lane
departure warning system, and (2)
realize the potential safety benefits that
can be expected with the utilization of
this technology as estimated in the
report described above.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), FMCSA requests public
comment from all interested persons on
the applications for an exemption from
49 CFR 393.116(a)(3) submitted by Conway, Takata, and Iteris. All comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated at
the beginning of this notice will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the
location listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. Comments
received after the comment closing date
will be filed in the public docket and
will be considered to the extent
practicable. In addition to late
comments, FMCSA will also continue to
file, in the public docket, relevant
information that becomes available after
the comment closing date. Interested
persons should continue to examine the
public docket for new material.
Issued on: June 4, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–14222 Filed 6–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0177]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for
Safe Operation; Application for an
Exemption From the Flatbed Carrier
Safety Group
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for
exemption; request for comments.
SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public
comment on an application for
exemption from the Flatbed Carrier
Safety Group (FCSG) regarding the
securement of metal coils on a flatbed
vehicle, in a sided vehicle, or in an
intermodal container loaded with eyes
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33667
crosswise, grouped in rows, in which
the coils are loaded to contact each
other in the longitudinal direction.
FCSG wants to use the pre-January 1,
2004 cargo securement regulations for
the transportation of groups of metal
coils with eyes crosswise.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
FMCSA–2008–0224 by any of the
following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on the Federal electronic docket site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and docket
number for this notice. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
exemption process, see the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ heading below. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. Please
see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading for further
information.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov or to Room W12–
140, DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19476) or you may visit https://
www.regulations.gov.
Public participation: The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is
generally available 24 hours each day,
365 days each year. You can get
electronic submission and retrieval help
and guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section
of the https://www.regulations.gov Web
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
33668
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 113 / Monday, June 14, 2010 / Notices
site and also at the DOT’s https://
docketsinfo.dot.gov Web site. If you
want us to notify you that we received
your comments, please include a self
addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting
comments online.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Luke W. Loy, Vehicle and Roadside
Operations Division, Office of Bus and
Truck Standards and Operations, MC–
PSV, (202) 366–0676; Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Section 4007 of the Transportation
Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA–
21) [Pub. L. 105–178, June 9, 1998, 112
Stat. 401] amended 49 U.S.C. 31315 and
31136(e) to provide authority to grant
exemptions from the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs).
On August 20, 2004, FMCSA published
a final rule (69 FR 51589) implementing
section 4007. Under this rule, FMCSA
must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide
the public with an opportunity to
inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety
analyses that have been conducted. The
Agency must also provide an
opportunity for public comment on the
request.
The Agency reviews the safety
analyses and the public comments and
determines whether granting the
exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to or greater than
the level that would be achieved by the
current regulation (49 CFR 381.305).
The decision of the Agency must be
published in the Federal Register (49
CFR 381.315(b)). If the Agency denies
the request, it must state the reason for
doing so. If the decision is to grant the
exemption, the notice must specify the
person or class of persons receiving the
exemption and the regulatory provision
or provisions from which an exemption
is granted. The notice must also specify
the effective period of the exemption
(up to 2 years) and explain the terms
and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR
381.315(c) and 49 CFR 381.300(b)).
FCSG’s Application for Exemption
On March 30, 2010, FCSG applied for
an exemption from 49 CFR 393.120 to
allow motor carriers to comply with the
pre-January 1, 2004 cargo securement
regulations (then at 49 CFR 393.100(c))
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jun 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
for the transportation of groups of metal
coils with eyes crosswise. A copy of the
application is included in the docket
referenced at the beginning of this
notice.
On September 27, 2002, FMCSA
published a final rule revising the
regulations concerning protection
against shifting and falling cargo for
commercial motor vehicles engaged in
interstate commerce (reference 67 FR
61212). The new rules were based on
the North American Cargo Securement
Standard Model Regulations, the motor
carrier industry’s best practices, and
recommendations presented during a
series of public meetings involving U.S.
and Canadian industry experts, Federal,
State, and Provincial enforcement
officials, and other interested parties.
Motor carriers were required to ensure
compliance with the rule by January 1,
2004.
The September 2002 final rule
established detailed requirements for a
number of specific commodities (logs;
dressed lumber; metal coils; paper rolls;
concrete pipe; intermodal containers;
automobiles, light trucks and vans;
heavy vehicles, equipment and
machinery; flattened and crushed
vehicles; roll-on/roll-off containers; and
large boulders) that, during the public
meetings concerning the development of
the model regulations, were identified
to cause the most disagreement between
industry and enforcement agencies as to
what is required for proper securement.
The commodity-specific requirements
for these items take precedence over the
general rules when additional
requirements are given for a commodity
listed in those sections. This means all
cargo securement systems must meet the
general requirements, except to the
extent a commodity-specific rule
imposes additional requirements that
prescribe in more detail the securement
method to be used.
Currently, section 393.120 of the
FMCSRs specifies requirements for the
securement of one or more metal coils
which, individually or grouped
together, weigh 5,000 pounds or more.
Metal coils can be transported with eyes
vertical, eyes lengthwise, or eyes
crosswise.
(1) Section 393.120(b) specifies
requirements for the securement of coils
transported with eyes vertical. Specific
requirements are provided for the
securement of individual coils, and
coils grouped in rows.
(2) Section 393.120(d) specifies
requirements for the securement of coils
transported with eyes lengthwise.
Specific requirements are provided for
the securement of individual coils, and
rows of coils.
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(3) Section 393.120(c) specifies
requirements for the securement of coils
transported with eyes crosswise as
follows:
393.120(c) Securement of coils transported
with eyes crosswise on a flatbed vehicle, in
a sided vehicle or intermodal container with
anchor points—(1) An individual coil. Each
coil must be secured by the following:
(c)(1)(i) A means (e.g., timbers, chocks or
wedges, a cradle, etc.) to prevent the coil
from rolling. The means of preventing rolling
must support the coil off the deck, and must
not be capable of becoming unintentionally
unfastened or loose while the vehicle is in
transit. If timbers, chocks or wedges are used,
they must be held in place by coil bunks or
similar devices to prevent them from coming
loose. The use of nailed blocking or cleats as
the sole means to secure timbers, chocks or
wedges, or a nailed wood cradle, is
prohibited;
(c)(1)(ii) At least one tiedown through its
eye, restricting against forward motion, and
whenever practicable, making an angle no
more than 45 degrees with the floor of the
vehicle or intermodal container when viewed
from the side of the vehicle or container; and
(c)(1)(iii) At least one tiedown through its
eye, restricting against rearward motion, and
whenever practicable, making an angle no
more than 45 degrees with the floor of the
vehicle or intermodal container when viewed
from the side of the vehicle or container.
(c)(2) Prohibition on crossing of tiedowns
when coils are transported with eyes
crosswise. Attaching tiedowns diagonally
through the eye of a coil to form an X-pattern
when viewed from above the vehicle is
prohibited.
Unlike the requirements for securing
coils with eyes vertical (section
393.120(b)) and eyes lengthwise (section
393.120(d)), section 393.120(c) only
specifies requirements for the
securement of individual coils; there are
no specific requirements for securing
rows of coils. As such, a motor carrier
transporting a row of coils with eyes
crosswise must treat each coil as an
individual coil, and secure each in
accordance with the requirements
outlined in section 393.120(c) as above.
Whereas the current commodityspecific regulations at section 393.120
for securing metal coils do not address
the securement of groups of coils loaded
with eyes crosswise, FCSG notes that
the cargo securement regulations that
were in place prior to January 1, 2004
directly addressed this specific loading
configuration. Section 393.100(c) of the
pre-January 2004 cargo securement rules
reads as follows:
393.100(c)(ii) Coils with eyes crosswise: Each
coil or transverse row of coils loaded side by
side and having approximately the same
outside diameters must be secured by—
(a) A tiedown assembly through the eye of
each coil, restricting against forward motion
and making an angle of less than 45° with the
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 113 / Monday, June 14, 2010 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
horizontal when viewed from the side of the
vehicle;
(b) A tiedown assembly through the eye of
each coil, restricting against rearward motion
and making an angle of less than 45° with the
horizontal when viewed from the side of the
vehicle; and
(c) Timbers, having a nominal cross section
of 4 x 4 inches or more and a length which
is at least 75 percent of the width of the coil
or row of coils, tightly placed against both
the front and rear sides of the coil or row of
coils and restrained to prevent movement of
the coil or coils in the forward and rearward
directions.
(d) If coils are loaded to contact each other
in the longitudinal direction and relative
motion between coils, and between coils and
the vehicle, is prevented by tiedown
assemblies and timbers—
(1) Only the foremost and rearmost coils
must be secured with timbers; and
(2) A single tiedown assembly, restricting
against forward motion, may be used to
secure any coil except the rearmost one,
which must be restrained against rearward
motion. [Emphasis added]
FCSG states without the temporary
exemption, adherence to the existing
regulations at 393.120(c) for the
securement of rows of coils loaded with
eyes crosswise—i.e., treating each coil
as an individual coil—places a burden
on the motor carrier to carry
significantly more coil bunks and
timbers to secure each coil in a raised
bunk off the deck. If permitted to secure
loads of coils with eyes crosswise in
rows in which the coils are loaded to
contact each other in the longitudinal
direction, FCSG states that because the
coils are grouped and secured together,
i.e., ‘‘unitized,’’ there is no additional
safety benefit to justify the additional
coil bunks and timbers. FCSG states that
securing groups of coils in this manner
allows the load to be unitized in a
secure manner while still meeting all of
the aggregate working load limit
requirements of 49 CFR 393.106(d).
FCSG notes that it intends to work
cooperatively with the North American
Cargo Securement Harmonization
Forum to effect these changes in the
North American Cargo Securement
Model Regulation, which is the
document that both the U.S. and Canada
have committed to use to update the
cargo securement requirements in both
the FMCSRs and the Canadian National
Safety Code. FCSG states that this will
enable CMV operators to continue to
secure groups of coils with eyes
crosswise in a manner that unitizes
adjacent coils and was previously
deemed adequate and secure prior to the
January 2004 revisions to the cargo
securement regulations.
For the reasons stated above, FCSG
requests that motor carriers be permitted
to secure metal coils loaded with eyes
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jun 11, 2010
Jkt 220001
crosswise, in rows in which the coils are
loaded to contact each other in the
longitudinal direction, in accordance
with the pre-January 2004 cargo
securement requirements (then
393.100(c)) instead of using the current
requirements of 393.120(c) which
effectively require each coil in a row of
coils to be treated as an individual coil
for the purposes of securement. While
the current commodity-specific
regulations for the securement of metal
coils at 49 CFR 393.120 specify the
securement requirements for individual
coils loaded with eyes crosswise, these
regulations do not provide guidance
regarding the securement of coils with
eyes crosswise, grouped in rows, in
which the coils are loaded to contact
each other in the longitudinal direction.
FCSG is making this request because it
believes that utilization of the preJanuary 2004 regulations—which
specifically addressed coils transported
with eyes crosswise, grouped in rows, in
which the coils are loaded to contact
each other in the longitudinal
direction—will maintain a level of
safety that is equivalent to the level of
safety achieved without the exemption.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315
and 31136(e), FMCSA requests public
comment from all interested persons on
FCSG’s application for an exemption
from 49 CFR 393.120. All comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated at
the beginning of this notice will be
considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the
location listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. Comments
received after the comment closing date
will be filed in the public docket and
will be considered to the extent
practicable. In addition to late
comments, FMCSA will also continue to
file, in the public docket, relevant
information that becomes available after
the comment closing date. Interested
persons should continue to examine the
public docket for new material.
Issued on: June 4, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–14224 Filed 6–11–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33669
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
June 7, 2010.
The Department of the Treasury will
submit the following public information
collection requirements to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 on or after the date
of publication of this notice. A copy of
the submissions may be obtained by
calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance
Officer listed. Comments regarding
these information collections should be
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed
and to the Treasury PRA Clearance
Officer, Department of the Treasury,
1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite
11010, Washington, DC 20220.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before July 14, 2010 to be
assured of consideration.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
OMB Number: 1545–2036
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: Taxation and Reporting of REIT
Excess Inclusion Income (Notice 2006–
97).
Abstract: The notice requires certain
REITs, RICs, partnerships and other
Pass-Through Entities that have excess
inclusion income to disclose the amount
and character of such income allocable
to their record interest owners. The
record interest owners need the
information to properly report and pay
taxes on such income.
Respondents: Private Sector:
Businesses or other for-profits.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 100
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–0735
Type of Review: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
Title: LR–189–80 (T.D. 7927) Final
Amortization of Reforestation
Expenditures
Abstract: 26 U.S.C. 194(a) allows
taxpayers to elect to amortize certain
reforestation expenditures over a 7-year
period if the expenditures meet certain
requirements. The regulations
implement this election provision and
allow the Service to determine if the
election is proper and allowable.
Respondents: Individuals or
Households.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 6,001
hours.
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 113 (Monday, June 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33667-33669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14224]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0177]
Parts and Accessories Necessary for Safe Operation; Application
for an Exemption From the Flatbed Carrier Safety Group
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA requests public comment on an application for exemption
from the Flatbed Carrier Safety Group (FCSG) regarding the securement
of metal coils on a flatbed vehicle, in a sided vehicle, or in an
intermodal container loaded with eyes crosswise, grouped in rows, in
which the coils are loaded to contact each other in the longitudinal
direction. FCSG wants to use the pre-January 1, 2004 cargo securement
regulations for the transportation of groups of metal coils with eyes
crosswise.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 14, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
FMCSA-2008-0224 by any of the following methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the Federal electronic docket
site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Ground Floor, Room W12-140, DOT Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this notice. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the exemption process, see the
``Public Participation'' heading below. Note that all comments received
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided. Please see the ``Privacy Act''
heading for further information.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov or to Room W12-140,
DOT Building, New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476) or you may visit https://www.regulations.gov.
Public participation: The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
generally available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get
electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the
``help'' section of the https://www.regulations.gov Web
[[Page 33668]]
site and also at the DOT's https://docketsinfo.dot.gov Web site. If you
want us to notify you that we received your comments, please include a
self addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the
acknowledgement page that appears after submitting comments online.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Luke W. Loy, Vehicle and Roadside
Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations,
MC-PSV, (202) 366-0676; Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4007 of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
(TEA- 21) [Pub. L. 105-178, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 401] amended 49
U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e) to provide authority to grant exemptions from
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs). On August 20,
2004, FMCSA published a final rule (69 FR 51589) implementing section
4007. Under this rule, FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public with an opportunity to inspect the information
relevant to the application, including any safety analyses that have
been conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
The Agency reviews the safety analyses and the public comments and
determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a level
of safety equivalent to or greater than the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)). If the Agency denies the request, it must state the reason
for doing so. If the decision is to grant the exemption, the notice
must specify the person or class of persons receiving the exemption and
the regulatory provision or provisions from which an exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period of the
exemption (up to 2 years) and explain the terms and conditions of the
exemption. The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.315(c) and 49 CFR
381.300(b)).
FCSG's Application for Exemption
On March 30, 2010, FCSG applied for an exemption from 49 CFR
393.120 to allow motor carriers to comply with the pre-January 1, 2004
cargo securement regulations (then at 49 CFR 393.100(c)) for the
transportation of groups of metal coils with eyes crosswise. A copy of
the application is included in the docket referenced at the beginning
of this notice.
On September 27, 2002, FMCSA published a final rule revising the
regulations concerning protection against shifting and falling cargo
for commercial motor vehicles engaged in interstate commerce (reference
67 FR 61212). The new rules were based on the North American Cargo
Securement Standard Model Regulations, the motor carrier industry's
best practices, and recommendations presented during a series of public
meetings involving U.S. and Canadian industry experts, Federal, State,
and Provincial enforcement officials, and other interested parties.
Motor carriers were required to ensure compliance with the rule by
January 1, 2004.
The September 2002 final rule established detailed requirements for
a number of specific commodities (logs; dressed lumber; metal coils;
paper rolls; concrete pipe; intermodal containers; automobiles, light
trucks and vans; heavy vehicles, equipment and machinery; flattened and
crushed vehicles; roll-on/roll-off containers; and large boulders)
that, during the public meetings concerning the development of the
model regulations, were identified to cause the most disagreement
between industry and enforcement agencies as to what is required for
proper securement. The commodity-specific requirements for these items
take precedence over the general rules when additional requirements are
given for a commodity listed in those sections. This means all cargo
securement systems must meet the general requirements, except to the
extent a commodity-specific rule imposes additional requirements that
prescribe in more detail the securement method to be used.
Currently, section 393.120 of the FMCSRs specifies requirements for
the securement of one or more metal coils which, individually or
grouped together, weigh 5,000 pounds or more. Metal coils can be
transported with eyes vertical, eyes lengthwise, or eyes crosswise.
(1) Section 393.120(b) specifies requirements for the securement of
coils transported with eyes vertical. Specific requirements are
provided for the securement of individual coils, and coils grouped in
rows.
(2) Section 393.120(d) specifies requirements for the securement of
coils transported with eyes lengthwise. Specific requirements are
provided for the securement of individual coils, and rows of coils.
(3) Section 393.120(c) specifies requirements for the securement of
coils transported with eyes crosswise as follows:
393.120(c) Securement of coils transported with eyes crosswise
on a flatbed vehicle, in a sided vehicle or intermodal container
with anchor points--(1) An individual coil. Each coil must be
secured by the following:
(c)(1)(i) A means (e.g., timbers, chocks or wedges, a cradle,
etc.) to prevent the coil from rolling. The means of preventing
rolling must support the coil off the deck, and must not be capable
of becoming unintentionally unfastened or loose while the vehicle is
in transit. If timbers, chocks or wedges are used, they must be held
in place by coil bunks or similar devices to prevent them from
coming loose. The use of nailed blocking or cleats as the sole means
to secure timbers, chocks or wedges, or a nailed wood cradle, is
prohibited;
(c)(1)(ii) At least one tiedown through its eye, restricting
against forward motion, and whenever practicable, making an angle no
more than 45 degrees with the floor of the vehicle or intermodal
container when viewed from the side of the vehicle or container; and
(c)(1)(iii) At least one tiedown through its eye, restricting
against rearward motion, and whenever practicable, making an angle
no more than 45 degrees with the floor of the vehicle or intermodal
container when viewed from the side of the vehicle or container.
(c)(2) Prohibition on crossing of tiedowns when coils are
transported with eyes crosswise. Attaching tiedowns diagonally
through the eye of a coil to form an X-pattern when viewed from
above the vehicle is prohibited.
Unlike the requirements for securing coils with eyes vertical
(section 393.120(b)) and eyes lengthwise (section 393.120(d)), section
393.120(c) only specifies requirements for the securement of individual
coils; there are no specific requirements for securing rows of coils.
As such, a motor carrier transporting a row of coils with eyes
crosswise must treat each coil as an individual coil, and secure each
in accordance with the requirements outlined in section 393.120(c) as
above.
Whereas the current commodity-specific regulations at section
393.120 for securing metal coils do not address the securement of
groups of coils loaded with eyes crosswise, FCSG notes that the cargo
securement regulations that were in place prior to January 1, 2004
directly addressed this specific loading configuration. Section
393.100(c) of the pre-January 2004 cargo securement rules reads as
follows:
393.100(c)(ii) Coils with eyes crosswise: Each coil or transverse
row of coils loaded side by side and having approximately the same
outside diameters must be secured by--
(a) A tiedown assembly through the eye of each coil, restricting
against forward motion and making an angle of less than 45[deg] with
the
[[Page 33669]]
horizontal when viewed from the side of the vehicle;
(b) A tiedown assembly through the eye of each coil, restricting
against rearward motion and making an angle of less than 45[deg]
with the horizontal when viewed from the side of the vehicle; and
(c) Timbers, having a nominal cross section of 4 x 4 inches or
more and a length which is at least 75 percent of the width of the
coil or row of coils, tightly placed against both the front and rear
sides of the coil or row of coils and restrained to prevent movement
of the coil or coils in the forward and rearward directions.
(d) If coils are loaded to contact each other in the
longitudinal direction and relative motion between coils, and
between coils and the vehicle, is prevented by tiedown assemblies
and timbers--
(1) Only the foremost and rearmost coils must be secured with
timbers; and
(2) A single tiedown assembly, restricting against forward
motion, may be used to secure any coil except the rearmost one,
which must be restrained against rearward motion. [Emphasis added]
FCSG states without the temporary exemption, adherence to the
existing regulations at 393.120(c) for the securement of rows of coils
loaded with eyes crosswise--i.e., treating each coil as an individual
coil--places a burden on the motor carrier to carry significantly more
coil bunks and timbers to secure each coil in a raised bunk off the
deck. If permitted to secure loads of coils with eyes crosswise in rows
in which the coils are loaded to contact each other in the longitudinal
direction, FCSG states that because the coils are grouped and secured
together, i.e., ``unitized,'' there is no additional safety benefit to
justify the additional coil bunks and timbers. FCSG states that
securing groups of coils in this manner allows the load to be unitized
in a secure manner while still meeting all of the aggregate working
load limit requirements of 49 CFR 393.106(d).
FCSG notes that it intends to work cooperatively with the North
American Cargo Securement Harmonization Forum to effect these changes
in the North American Cargo Securement Model Regulation, which is the
document that both the U.S. and Canada have committed to use to update
the cargo securement requirements in both the FMCSRs and the Canadian
National Safety Code. FCSG states that this will enable CMV operators
to continue to secure groups of coils with eyes crosswise in a manner
that unitizes adjacent coils and was previously deemed adequate and
secure prior to the January 2004 revisions to the cargo securement
regulations.
For the reasons stated above, FCSG requests that motor carriers be
permitted to secure metal coils loaded with eyes crosswise, in rows in
which the coils are loaded to contact each other in the longitudinal
direction, in accordance with the pre-January 2004 cargo securement
requirements (then 393.100(c)) instead of using the current
requirements of 393.120(c) which effectively require each coil in a row
of coils to be treated as an individual coil for the purposes of
securement. While the current commodity-specific regulations for the
securement of metal coils at 49 CFR 393.120 specify the securement
requirements for individual coils loaded with eyes crosswise, these
regulations do not provide guidance regarding the securement of coils
with eyes crosswise, grouped in rows, in which the coils are loaded to
contact each other in the longitudinal direction. FCSG is making this
request because it believes that utilization of the pre-January 2004
regulations--which specifically addressed coils transported with eyes
crosswise, grouped in rows, in which the coils are loaded to contact
each other in the longitudinal direction--will maintain a level of
safety that is equivalent to the level of safety achieved without the
exemption.
Request for Comments
In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on FCSG's application for an
exemption from 49 CFR 393.120. All comments received before the close
of business on the comment closing date indicated at the beginning of
this notice will be considered and will be available for examination in
the docket at the location listed under the ADDRESSES section of this
notice. Comments received after the comment closing date will be filed
in the public docket and will be considered to the extent practicable.
In addition to late comments, FMCSA will also continue to file, in the
public docket, relevant information that becomes available after the
comment closing date. Interested persons should continue to examine the
public docket for new material.
Issued on: June 4, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-14224 Filed 6-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P