Preferred Supplier Program (PSP); Withdrawal, 33273 [2010-14045]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Notices
acquisitions of commercial information
technology.
Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
[FR Doc. 2010–14124 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(FEIS) for Disposal and Reuse of Fort
Monroe, VA
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of Availability (NOA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the Army
announces the availability of the FEIS
which evaluates the potential
environmental and socioeconomic
impacts associated with the disposal
and reuse of Fort Monroe, Virginia.
DATES: The waiting period for the FEIS
will end 30 days after publication of an
NOA in the Federal Register by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
ADDRESSES: To obtain a copy of the FEIS
contact Ms. Robin Mills, Chief,
Directorate of Public Works, 318 Cornog
Lane, Fort Monroe, VA 23651 or e-mail
request to
monr.post.nepapublic@us.army.mil.
SUMMARY:
The FEIS
covers activities associated with the
disposal and reuse of Fort Monroe. The
2005 BRAC Commission Report directed
the closure of Fort Monroe and the
relocation of certain tenant
organizations to Fort Eustis, Virginia
and Fort Knox, Kentucky. Closure is
required no later than September 15,
2011.
Following closure, the property
(approximately 565 acres) will be excess
to Army needs and the Army proposes
to dispose of its remaining real property
interests. The Fort Monroe Federal Area
Development Authority (FMFADA)
developed the Fort Monroe Reuse Plan
formally adopted in August 2008. The
plan is available as an appendix of the
FEIS. On July 1, 2010, the FMFADA will
restructure and become the Fort Monroe
Authority. After September 15, 2011,
when Fort Monroe is no longer used for
national defense purposes, there will be
property reverting to the
Commonwealth of Virginia and property
disposed of by the Federal Government.
For non-reverting property, there are
four alternatives analyzed in the FEIS:
Alternative 1, No Action Alternative,
under which the Army would continue
operations at Fort Monroe at levels
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:04 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
similar to those occurring prior to the
BRAC Commission’s recommendation
for closure; Alternative 2, Early Transfer
Alternative, under which transfer and
reuse of the property would occur
before environmental remediation
actions have been completed on all
individual parcels; Alternative 3,
Traditional Disposal Alternative, under
which transfer and reuse of the property
would occur once environmental
remediation is complete on all
individual parcels of the installation;
and Alternative 4, Caretaker Status
Alternative, which begins following the
closure of the installation in the event
that the Army is unable to dispose of the
property, after which time the
maintenance of the property would be
reduced to minimal activities not
inconsistent with the Programmatic
Agreement necessary to ensure security,
health, and safety, and to avoid physical
deterioration of facilities. The Army’s
preferred alternative for the disposal of
Fort Monroe is Alternative 2, the early
transfer of non-reverting property.
Under this alternative, the Army
transfers the non-reverting property
before completion of all environmental
cleanup. Three reuse scenarios, based
on lower bracket, middle bracket, and
upper bracket intensity levels of reuse
are also evaluated as secondary actions
of disposal of Fort Monroe. The FEIS
addresses reuse of all property on Fort
Monroe, including property that will
revert back to the Commonwealth of
Virginia. These reuse scenarios
encompass the level of reuse expected
under the Reuse Plan, which is
considered the middle bracket scenario.
For early transfer (Alternative 2) and
traditional disposal alternatives
(Alternative 3), significant adverse
effects would be expected to occur to
transportation, and moderate adverse
effects would be expected to occur to
noise, land use, biological resources,
and cultural resources. The caretaker
alternative (Alternative 4) would have
moderate adverse effects on aesthetic/
visual resources, cultural resources, and
utilities. Of the three reuse scenarios
analyzed in the FEIS, middle and upper
bracket reuse would be expected to
result in significant adverse effects in
the area of transportation. Middle and
upper bracket reuse would also be
expected to result in moderate adverse
effects on noise, land use, biological
resources, and cultural resources. Lower
bracket reuse would not have any
moderate or significant adverse effects.
The FEIS identifies potential mitigation
and management measures that would
decrease the level of adverse effects of
disposal and reuse.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
33273
A Record of Decision will not be
issued earlier than 30 days after this
notice. An electronic version of the FEIS
can be viewed or downloaded from the
following Web site: https://
www.hqda.army.mil/acsim/brac/
nepa_eis_docs.htm.
Dated: May 26, 2010.
Addison D. Davis, IV,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Environment, Safety and Occupational
Health).
[FR Doc. 2010–13494 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
[Docket ID: USN–2010–0021]
Preferred Supplier Program (PSP);
Withdrawal
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Department of the Navy, DOD.
Notice; withdrawal.
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy
(DoN) published a Notice in the Federal
Register (75 FR 100) on May 25, 2010,
concerning a policy that would establish
a Preferred Supplier Program (PSP) with
contractors that have demonstrated
exemplary performance, at the corporate
level; in the areas of cost, schedule,
performance, quality, and business
relations. DoN is formally withdrawing
this Notice as of June 11, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clarence Belton, 703–693–4006 or
clarence.belton@navy.mil.
Dated: June 7, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge
Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–14045 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 112 (Friday, June 11, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 33273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14045]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
[Docket ID: USN-2010-0021]
Preferred Supplier Program (PSP); Withdrawal
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DOD.
ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DoN) published a Notice in the
Federal Register (75 FR 100) on May 25, 2010, concerning a policy that
would establish a Preferred Supplier Program (PSP) with contractors
that have demonstrated exemplary performance, at the corporate level;
in the areas of cost, schedule, performance, quality, and business
relations. DoN is formally withdrawing this Notice as of June 11, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clarence Belton, 703-693-4006 or
clarence.belton@navy.mil.
Dated: June 7, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-14045 Filed 6-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
