Safety Zone; City of Martinez 4th of July Fireworks, Martinez, CA, 33170-33172 [2010-14034]
Download as PDF
33170
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 is not required.
For the effective date of this final rule,
see the DATES section of this document.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 872
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 872 is
amended as follows:
■
PART 872—DENTAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 872 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 371.
§ 872.3700
■
[Removed]
2. Remove § 872.3700.
Dated: June 8, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2010–0371 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
two locations: The Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Ensign Elizabeth Ellerson, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco, at
415–399–7436 or e-mail at D11-PFMarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2010–14083 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
Regulatory Information
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
as it would be impracticable to publish
an NPRM with respect to this rule
because the event would occur before
the rulemaking process could be
completed. Because of the dangers
posed by the pyrotechnics used in this
fireworks display, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators, spectator
craft, and other vessels transiting the
event area. For the safety concerns
noted, it is in the public interest to have
these regulations in effect during the
event.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0371]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; City of Martinez 4th of
July Fireworks, Martinez, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
the launching of fireworks being
sponsored by the City of Martinez. The
fireworks display will be held on July 4,
2010, on the shoreline of the Carquinez
Straits. This safety zone is being
established to ensure the safety of
participants and spectators from the
dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or remaining in
the safety zone without permission of
the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m.
through 10:15 p.m. on July 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2010–
0371 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:29 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background and Purpose
The City of Martinez is sponsoring a
brief fireworks display on July 4, 2010.
The fireworks show is meant for
entertainment purposes and will be
used to celebrate Independence Day.
The fireworks display is scheduled to
launch at 9:30 p.m., on July 4, 2010, and
last twenty minutes. A safety zone
around the launch site is necessary to
protect spectators, vessels, and other
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
property from the hazards associated
with the pyrotechnics on the fireworks.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary safety zone on specified
waters of the Carquinez Straits, for the
City of Martinez Fourth of July
Fireworks Display. The safety zone will
apply to the navigable waters around
the fireworks site within a radius of 500
feet. The fireworks launch site is on the
shoreline of Martinez and will be
located in position 38°01′31.77″ N.,
122°08′23.75″ W. (NAD83).
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict general
navigation in the vicinity of the
fireworks launch site. Except for
persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the safety zone. This safety zone is
needed to keep spectators and vessels a
safe distance away from the fireworks
launch site to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators, and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Although this rule restricts access to
the waters encompassed by the safety
zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be
affected are pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of pleasure craft engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for several
reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely
around the area, (ii) vessels engaged in
recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected
portion of the area of Martinez, CA to
engage in these activities, (iii) this rule
will encompass only a small portion of
the waterway for a limited period of
time, and (iv) the maritime public will
be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:29 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
33171
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves establishing, disestablishing, or
changing Regulated Navigation Areas
and security or safety zones. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
33172
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 112 / Friday, June 11, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
■
2. Add § 165.T11–320 to read as
follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 165.T11–320 Safety Zone; City of
Martinez 4th of July Fireworks, Martinez,
CA.
40 CFR Part 52
(a) Location. This temporary safety
zone is established for the waters of
Martinez, CA. The fireworks launch site
will be located in position 38°01′31.77″
N., 122°08′23.75″ W. (NAD 83). The
temporary safety zone applies to the
navigable waters around the fireworks
site within a radius of 500 feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23, entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone (415)
399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 9 p.m. through 10:15 p.m.
on July 4, 2010.
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonable Further
Progress Plan, 2002 Base Year
Emission Inventory, Contingency
Measures, Reasonably Available
Control Measures, and Transportation
Conformity Budgets for the
Philadelphia 1997 8-Hour Moderate
Ozone Nonattainment Area
Dated: May 28, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
[FR Doc. 2010–14034 Filed 6–10–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:29 Jun 10, 2010
Jkt 220001
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0956; FRL–9160–3]
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to meet the reasonable further
progress (RFP) plan, the 2002 base year
emissions inventory, RFP contingency
measure, and reasonably available
control measure (RACM) requirements
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the
Maryland portion of the Philadelphia
moderate 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. EPA is also
approving the transportation conformity
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) associated with this revision.
EPA is approving the SIP revision
because it satisfies the emission
inventory, RFP, RACM, RFP
contingency measures, and
transportation conformity requirements
for areas classified as moderate
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates
further progress in reducing ozone
precursors. EPA is approving the SIP
revision pursuant to the CAA and EPA’s
regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0956. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by email at pino.maria@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 7, 2010 (75 FR 953), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for a SIP revision
submitted by the State of Maryland. The
NPR proposed approval of Maryland’s
2002 base year emissions inventory,
RFP plan, RFP contingency measures,
RACM, and MVEBs for the Maryland
portion of the Philadelphia moderate
1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
EPA is approving the SIP revision
because it satisfies the emission
inventory, RFP, RACM, RFP
contingency measure, and
transportation conformity requirements
of the section 110 and part D of the CAA
and EPA’s regulations. The formal SIP
revision was submitted by the State of
Maryland on June 4, 2007.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The SIP revision addresses emissions
inventory, RACM, RFP and contingency
measures requirements for the 1997 8hour ozone NAAQS for the Maryland
portion of the Philadelphia 8-hour
ozone moderate nonattainment area.
The SIP revision also establishes MVEBs
for 2008. Other specific requirements of
Maryland’s June 4, 2007 SIP revision for
the Philadelphia 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area and the rationale for
EPA’s proposed action are explained in
the NPR and will not be restated here.
The following public comment was
received on the NPR.
Comment: An anonymous commenter
submitted the comment: ‘‘We do not
need tighter regulations on ozone.
Ragweed is more of problem than
smog.’’
Response: The comment, while
vaguely expressing a general uncertainty
about the rule, does not identify any
particular defects in the rule substance
or adoption. Importantly, the comment
does not oppose EPA’s proposed full
approval of the rule. Moreover, while
the commenter expresses a general
dislike for regulations addressing ozone
pollution, the commenter does not
question the legal obligation for the
states to adopt and submit SIP revisions
E:\FR\FM\11JNR1.SGM
11JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 112 (Friday, June 11, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33170-33172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-14034]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0371]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; City of Martinez 4th of July Fireworks, Martinez, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
the launching of fireworks being sponsored by the City of Martinez. The
fireworks display will be held on July 4, 2010, on the shoreline of the
Carquinez Straits. This safety zone is being established to ensure the
safety of participants and spectators from the dangers associated with
the pyrotechnics. Unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or remaining in the safety zone
without permission of the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 p.m. through 10:15 p.m. on July 4,
2010.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0371 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2010-0371
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying
two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Ensign Elizabeth Ellerson, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
San Francisco, at 415-399-7436 or e-mail at D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM),
as it would be impracticable to publish an NPRM with respect to this
rule because the event would occur before the rulemaking process could
be completed. Because of the dangers posed by the pyrotechnics used in
this fireworks display, the safety zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of event participants, spectators, spectator craft, and other
vessels transiting the event area. For the safety concerns noted, it is
in the public interest to have these regulations in effect during the
event.
Background and Purpose
The City of Martinez is sponsoring a brief fireworks display on
July 4, 2010. The fireworks show is meant for entertainment purposes
and will be used to celebrate Independence Day. The fireworks display
is scheduled to launch at 9:30 p.m., on July 4, 2010, and last twenty
minutes. A safety zone around the launch site is necessary to protect
spectators, vessels, and other property from the hazards associated
with the pyrotechnics on the fireworks.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on
specified waters of the Carquinez Straits, for the City of Martinez
Fourth of July Fireworks Display. The safety zone will apply to the
navigable waters around the fireworks site within a radius of 500 feet.
The fireworks launch site is on the shoreline of Martinez and will be
located in position 38[deg]01'31.77'' N., 122[deg]08'23.75'' W.
(NAD83).
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict general
navigation in the vicinity of the fireworks launch site. Except for
persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety zone. This safety
zone is needed to keep spectators and vessels a safe distance away from
the fireworks launch site to ensure the safety of participants,
spectators, and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Although this rule restricts access to the waters encompassed by
the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be significant
because the local waterway users will be notified via public Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be affected are pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and
[[Page 33171]]
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities and sightseeing. This rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for several reasons: (i) Vessel traffic can pass safely around the
area, (ii) vessels engaged in recreational activities and sightseeing
have ample space outside of the effected portion of the area of
Martinez, CA to engage in these activities, (iii) this rule will
encompass only a small portion of the waterway for a limited period of
time, and (iv) the maritime public will be advised in advance of this
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves establishing,
disestablishing, or changing Regulated Navigation Areas and security or
safety zones. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
[[Page 33172]]
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-320 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-320 Safety Zone; City of Martinez 4th of July Fireworks,
Martinez, CA.
(a) Location. This temporary safety zone is established for the
waters of Martinez, CA. The fireworks launch site will be located in
position 38[deg]01'31.77'' N., 122[deg]08'23.75'' W. (NAD 83). The
temporary safety zone applies to the navigable waters around the
fireworks site within a radius of 500 feet.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast
Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or
assisting the Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) in the
enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec. 165.23,
entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-16 or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is effective from 9 p.m. through
10:15 p.m. on July 4, 2010.
Dated: May 28, 2010.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2010-14034 Filed 6-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P