Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Patuxent River, Solomons, MD, 32866-32869 [2010-13907]
Download as PDF
32866
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section
40103, Sovereignty and use of airspace.
Under that section, the FAA is charged
with prescribing regulations to ensure
the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace. This regulation is
within the scope of that authority
because it proposes to revise airspace at
Unalakleet, Alaska, and represents the
FAA’s continuing effort to safely and
efficiently use the navigable airspace.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
during the specific dates and times
established in advance by Notice to Airmen.
The effective date and time will thereafter be
continuously published in the Supplement
Alaska (Airport/Facility Directory).
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending
Upward from 700 Feet or More Above the
Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E5 Unalakleet, AK [Revised]
Unalakleet Airport, AK
(Lat. 63°53′19″ N., long. 160°47′57″ W.)
Unalakleet Localizer
(Lat. 63°52′52″ N., long. 160°47′42″ W.)
Unalakleet VOR/DME
(Lat. 63°52′31″ N., long. 160°41′04″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.3-mile
radius of the Unalakleet Airport, AK, and
within 3.8 miles either side of the 289 radial
of the Unalakleet VOR/DME, extending from
the 7.3-mile radius to 15.4 miles west of the
Unalakleet VOR/DME, and within 3.6 miles
either side of the Unalakleet Localizer front
course, extending from the 7.3-mile radius to
13.6 miles northwest of the Unalakleet
Airport; and that airspace extending upward
from 1,200 feet above the surface within a 74mile radius of the Unalakleet Airport, AK.
public meetings must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before the end of the
comment period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2010–0383 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, MD;
telephone 410–576–2674, e-mail
Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
Coast Guard
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
§ 71.1
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0383]
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 27, 2009, and effective
September 15, 2009, is to be amended
as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as Surface Areas.
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
AAL AK E2 Unalakleet, AK [Revised]
Unalakleet Airport, AK
(Lat. 63°53′19″ N., long. 160°47′57″ W.)
Unalakleet Localizer
(Lat. 63°52′52″ N., long. 160°47′42″ W.)
Within a 4.2-mile radius of the Unalakleet
Airport, AK, and within 3.2 miles each side
of the Unalakleet Localizer front course,
extending from the 4.2-mile radius to 12.6
miles northwest of the Unalakleet Airport,
AK. This Class E airspace area is effective
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Issued in Anchorage, AK, on May 28, 2010.
Michael A. Tarr,
Acting Manager, Alaska Flight Services
Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. 2010–13990 Filed 6–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
33 CFR Part 100
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine
Events; Patuxent River, Solomons, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish special local regulations
during the ‘‘Chesapeake Challenge’’
power boat races, a marine event to be
held on the waters of the Patuxent
River, near Solomons, MD on October 3,
2010. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life
on navigable waters during the event.
This action is intended to temporarily
restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the
Patuxent River during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before July 12, 2010. Requests for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2010–0383),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will
then become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu
select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert
‘‘USCG–2010–0383’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the
balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column.
If you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010–
0383’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one on or before the end of the
comment period, using one of the four
methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 3, 2010, the Chesapeake
Bay Power Boat Association will
sponsor power boat races on the
Patuxent River near Solomons, MD. The
event consists of offshore power boats
racing in a counter-clockwise direction
on a racetrack-type course located
between the Governor Thomas Johnson
Memorial (SR–4) Bridge and the U.S.
Naval Air Station Patuxent River, MD.
The start and finish lines will be located
near the Solomon’s Pier. A large
spectator fleet is expected during the
event. Due to the need for vessel control
during the event, the Coast Guard will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the
event area to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and other
transiting vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
temporary special local regulations on
specified waters of the Patuxent River.
The regulations will be enforced from
10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 3, 2010.
The regulated area, approximately 4,000
yards in length and 1,700 yards in
width, includes all waters of the
Patuxent River, within lines connecting
the following positions: from latitude
38°19′45″ N, longitude 076°28′06″ W,
thence to latitude 38°19′24″ N,
longitude 076°28′30″ W, thence to
latitude 38°18′32″ N, longitude
076°28′14″ W; and from latitude
38°17′38″ N, longitude 076°27′26″ W,
thence to latitude 38°18′00″ N,
longitude 076°26′41″ W, thence to
latitude 38°18′59″ N, longitude
076°27′20″ W, located at Solomons,
Maryland. The effect of this proposed
rule will be to restrict general navigation
in the regulated area during the event.
Spectator vessels will be allowed to
view the event from a designated
spectator area within the regulated area,
located within a line connecting the
following positions: latitude 38°19′14″
N, longitude 076°28′16″ W, thence to
latitude 38°18′00″ N, longitude
076°27′26″ W, thence to latitude
38°18′02″ N, longitude 076°27′20″ W,
thence to latitude 38°19′16″ N,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32867
longitude 076°28′10″ W, thence to the
point of origin at latitude 38°19′14″ N,
longitude 076°28′16″ W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 83. Spectator
vessels viewing the event outside the
regulated area may not block the
navigable channel. Other vessels
intending to transit the Patuxent River
will be allowed to safely transit around
the regulated area. These regulations are
needed to control vessel traffic during
the event to enhance the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We expect the economic impact
of this proposed rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. Although this
regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of the Patuxent
River during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the regulated
area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via the
Local Notice to Mariners and marine
information broadcasts, so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Additionally, the regulated area has
been narrowly tailored to impose the
least impact on general navigation yet
provide the level of safety deemed
necessary. Vessel traffic will be able to
transit safely through a portion
regulated area, westward and southward
of the spectator fleet area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
32868
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the effected portions of the
Patuxent River during the event.
Although this regulation prevents
traffic from transiting a portion of the
Patuxent River at Solomons, MD during
the event, this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This proposed
rule would be in effect for only a limited
period. Though the regulated area
extends across the entire width of the
river, vessel traffic will be able to transit
safely around the spectator fleet and
race course areas within the regulated
area. Before the enforcement period, we
will issue maritime advisories so
mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, MD. The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 100
applicable to organized marine events
on the navigable waters of the United
States that could negatively impact the
safety of waterway users and shore side
activities in the event area. The category
of water activities includes but is not
limited to sail boat regattas, boat
parades, power boat racing, swimming
events, crew racing, canoe and sail
board racing. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary section, § 100.35–
T05–0383, to read as follows:
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 100.35–T05–0383 Special Local
Regulations for Marine Events; Patuxent
River, Solomons, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following
location is a regulated area: All waters
of the Patuxent River within a line
connecting the following positions: from
latitude 38°19′45′ N, longitude
076°28′06′ W, thence to latitude
38°19′24″ N, longitude 076°28′30″ W,
thence to latitude 38°18′32″ N,
longitude 076°28′14″ W; and from
latitude 38°17′38″ N, longitude
076°27′26″ W, thence to latitude
38°18′00″ N, longitude 076°26′41″ W,
thence to latitude 38°18′59″ N,
longitude 076°27′20″ W, located at
Solomons, Maryland. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the U.S.
Coast Guard who has been designated
by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(3) Participant means all vessels
participating in the Chesapeake
Challenge under the auspices of the
Marine Event Permit issued to the event
sponsor and approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Baltimore.
(4) Spectator means all persons and
vessels not registered with the event
sponsor as participants or official patrol.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The
Coast Guard Patrol Commander may
forbid and control the movement of all
vessels in the regulated area. When
hailed or signaled by an official patrol
vessel, a vessel in the regulated area
shall immediately comply with the
directions given. Failure to do so may
result in expulsion from the area,
citation for failure to comply, or both.
(2) The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander may terminate the event, or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:38 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
the operation of any vessel participating
in the event, at any time it is deemed
necessary for the protection of life or
property.
(3) All vessel traffic, not involved
with the event, will be allowed to transit
the regulated area and shall proceed in
a northerly or southerly direction
westward of the spectator area, taking
action to avoid a close-quarters situation
with spectators, until finally past and
clear of the regulated area.
(4) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this regulated area can be contacted on
marine band radio VHF–FM channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
(5) Only participants and official
patrol are allowed to enter the race
course area.
(6) Spectators are allowed inside the
regulated area only if they remain
within the designated spectator area.
Spectators will be permitted to anchor
within the designated spectator area. No
vessel may anchor within the regulated
area outside the designated spectator
area. Spectators may contact the Coast
Guard Patrol Commander to request
permission to pass through the
regulated area. If permission is granted,
spectators must pass directly through
the regulated area outside the race
course and spectator areas at a safe
speed and without loitering.
(7) Designated Spectator Fleet Area.
The spectator fleet area is located within
a line connecting the following
positions: latitude 38°19′14″ N,
longitude 076°28′16″ W, thence to
latitude 38°18′00″ N, longitude
076°27′26″ W, thence to latitude
38°18′02″ N, longitude 076°27′20″ W,
thence to latitude 38°19′16″ N,
longitude 076°28′10″ W, thence to the
point of origin at latitude 38°19′14″ N,
longitude 076°28′16″ W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 83.
(8) The Coast Guard will publish a
notice in the Fifth Coast Guard District
Local Notice to Mariners and issue
marine information broadcast on VHF–
FM marine band radio announcing
specific event date and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. until 6
p.m. on October 3, 2010.
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Mark P. O’Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2010–13907 Filed 6–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32869
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R5–ES–2010–0032;
[92220–1111–0000–C5]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a
Petition To List a Distinct Population
Segment of the Gray Wolf in the
Northeastern United States as
Endangered
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of 90-day petition
finding.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce a
90-day finding on a petition to list a
Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of
the gray wolf (Canis lupus) in five
northeastern States as endangered under
the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). We find that the petition
does not present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
listing a DPS of the gray wolf in
Massachusetts, New York, Vermont,
New Hampshire, and Maine may be
warranted. Therefore, we will not
initiate a further status review in
response to this petition. However, we
ask the public to submit to us at any
time, any new information that becomes
available concerning the presence of the
gray wolf in the northeastern United
States, particularly information to
substantiate the presence of breeding
pairs.
DATES: The finding announced in this
document was made on June 10, 2010.
ADDRESSES: This finding is available on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov. Supporting
scientific documentation we used in
preparing this finding is available for
public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours, at the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New
England Field Office, 70 Commercial
Street, Suite 300, Concord, New
Hampshire 03301. Please submit any
new information, materials, comments,
or questions concerning this finding to
the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Chapman, Field Supervisor, or
Michael Amaral, Fish and Wildlife
Supervisory Biologist, of the New
England Field Office (see ADDRESSES),
by telephone at 603–223–2541, or by
facsimile to 603–223–0104. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD), please call the Federal
E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM
10JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 111 (Thursday, June 10, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32866-32869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13907]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0383]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulations for Marine Events; Patuxent River,
Solomons, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish special local
regulations during the ``Chesapeake Challenge'' power boat races, a
marine event to be held on the waters of the Patuxent River, near
Solomons, MD on October 3, 2010. These special local regulations are
necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters during
the event. This action is intended to temporarily restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Patuxent River during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 12, 2010. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before the end of the comment period.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2010-0383 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Ronald Houck, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, MD; telephone 410-576-2674, e-mail Ronald.L.Houck@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2010-0383), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (via https://www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or hand
delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the
[[Page 32867]]
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when it is
received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``submit a comment'' box, which will then become
highlighted in blue. In the ``Document Type'' drop down menu select
``Proposed Rule'' and insert ``USCG-2010-0383'' in the ``Keyword'' box.
Click ``Search'' then click on the balloon shape in the ``Actions''
column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit
them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable
for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and
would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
click on the ``read comments'' box, which will then become highlighted
in blue. In the ``Keyword'' box insert ``USCG-2010-0383'' and click
``Search.'' Click the ``Open Docket Folder'' in the ``Actions'' column.
You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before the end of the comment period, using one
of the four methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
On October 3, 2010, the Chesapeake Bay Power Boat Association will
sponsor power boat races on the Patuxent River near Solomons, MD. The
event consists of offshore power boats racing in a counter-clockwise
direction on a racetrack-type course located between the Governor
Thomas Johnson Memorial (SR-4) Bridge and the U.S. Naval Air Station
Patuxent River, MD. The start and finish lines will be located near the
Solomon's Pier. A large spectator fleet is expected during the event.
Due to the need for vessel control during the event, the Coast Guard
will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in the event area to provide
for the safety of participants, spectators and other transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to establish temporary special local
regulations on specified waters of the Patuxent River. The regulations
will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 3, 2010. The
regulated area, approximately 4,000 yards in length and 1,700 yards in
width, includes all waters of the Patuxent River, within lines
connecting the following positions: from latitude 38[deg]19'45'' N,
longitude 076[deg]28'06'' W, thence to latitude 38[deg]19'24'' N,
longitude 076[deg]28'30'' W, thence to latitude 38[deg]18'32'' N,
longitude 076[deg]28'14'' W; and from latitude 38[deg]17'38'' N,
longitude 076[deg]27'26'' W, thence to latitude 38[deg]18'00'' N,
longitude 076[deg]26'41'' W, thence to latitude 38[deg]18'59'' N,
longitude 076[deg]27'20'' W, located at Solomons, Maryland. The effect
of this proposed rule will be to restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the event. Spectator vessels will be allowed to
view the event from a designated spectator area within the regulated
area, located within a line connecting the following positions:
latitude 38[deg]19'14'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'16'' W, thence to
latitude 38[deg]18'00'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'26'' W, thence to
latitude 38[deg]18'02'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'20'' W, thence to
latitude 38[deg]19'16'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'10'' W, thence to the
point of origin at latitude 38[deg]19'14'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'16''
W. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 83. Spectator vessels viewing
the event outside the regulated area may not block the navigable
channel. Other vessels intending to transit the Patuxent River will be
allowed to safely transit around the regulated area. These regulations
are needed to control vessel traffic during the event to enhance the
safety of participants, spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. We expect the economic
impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures of DHS is
unnecessary. Although this regulation will prevent traffic from
transiting a portion of the Patuxent River during the event, the effect
of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited duration
that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive advance
notifications that will be made to the maritime community via the Local
Notice to Mariners and marine information broadcasts, so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly. Additionally, the regulated area has
been narrowly tailored to impose the least impact on general navigation
yet provide the level of safety deemed necessary. Vessel traffic will
be able to transit safely through a portion regulated area, westward
and southward of the spectator fleet area.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and
[[Page 32868]]
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in the effected
portions of the Patuxent River during the event.
Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of the Patuxent River at Solomons, MD during the event, this proposed
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the following reasons. This proposed rule
would be in effect for only a limited period. Though the regulated area
extends across the entire width of the river, vessel traffic will be
able to transit safely around the spectator fleet and race course areas
within the regulated area. Before the enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
MD. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves implementation of regulations within 33 CFR Part 100
applicable to organized marine events on the navigable waters of the
United States that could negatively impact the safety of waterway users
and shore side activities in the event area. The category of water
activities includes but is not limited to sail boat regattas, boat
parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew racing, canoe and
sail board racing. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
[[Page 32869]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
2. Add a temporary section, Sec. 100.35-T05-0383, to read as
follows:
Sec. 100.35-T05-0383 Special Local Regulations for Marine Events;
Patuxent River, Solomons, MD.
(a) Regulated area. The following location is a regulated area: All
waters of the Patuxent River within a line connecting the following
positions: from latitude 38[deg]19'45' N, longitude 076[deg]28'06' W,
thence to latitude 38[deg]19'24'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'30'' W,
thence to latitude 38[deg]18'32'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'14'' W; and
from latitude 38[deg]17'38'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'26'' W, thence to
latitude 38[deg]18'00'' N, longitude 076[deg]26'41'' W, thence to
latitude 38[deg]18'59'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'20'' W, located at
Solomons, Maryland. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions: (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has
been designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
(3) Participant means all vessels participating in the Chesapeake
Challenge under the auspices of the Marine Event Permit issued to the
event sponsor and approved by Commander, Coast Guard Baltimore.
(4) Spectator means all persons and vessels not registered with the
event sponsor as participants or official patrol.
(c) Special local regulations: (1) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander
may forbid and control the movement of all vessels in the regulated
area. When hailed or signaled by an official patrol vessel, a vessel in
the regulated area shall immediately comply with the directions given.
Failure to do so may result in expulsion from the area, citation for
failure to comply, or both.
(2) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander may terminate the event, or
the operation of any vessel participating in the event, at any time it
is deemed necessary for the protection of life or property.
(3) All vessel traffic, not involved with the event, will be
allowed to transit the regulated area and shall proceed in a northerly
or southerly direction westward of the spectator area, taking action to
avoid a close-quarters situation with spectators, until finally past
and clear of the regulated area.
(4) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this regulated area can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(5) Only participants and official patrol are allowed to enter the
race course area.
(6) Spectators are allowed inside the regulated area only if they
remain within the designated spectator area. Spectators will be
permitted to anchor within the designated spectator area. No vessel may
anchor within the regulated area outside the designated spectator area.
Spectators may contact the Coast Guard Patrol Commander to request
permission to pass through the regulated area. If permission is
granted, spectators must pass directly through the regulated area
outside the race course and spectator areas at a safe speed and without
loitering.
(7) Designated Spectator Fleet Area. The spectator fleet area is
located within a line connecting the following positions: latitude
38[deg]19'14'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'16'' W, thence to latitude
38[deg]18'00'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'26'' W, thence to latitude
38[deg]18'02'' N, longitude 076[deg]27'20'' W, thence to latitude
38[deg]19'16'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'10'' W, thence to the point of
origin at latitude 38[deg]19'14'' N, longitude 076[deg]28'16'' W. All
coordinates reference Datum NAD 83.
(8) The Coast Guard will publish a notice in the Fifth Coast Guard
District Local Notice to Mariners and issue marine information
broadcast on VHF-FM marine band radio announcing specific event date
and times.
(d) Enforcement period: This section will be enforced from 10 a.m.
until 6 p.m. on October 3, 2010.
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. 2010-13907 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P