Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Standards: Exemption, 32983-32984 [2010-13903]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Notices
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to approve a current information
collection. This rule generates a need for
new designated pilot examiners and
designated airworthiness
representatives to support the
certification of these new aircraft, pilots,
flight instructors, and ground
instructors.
Please submit comments by
August 9, 2010.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 3, 2010.
Carla Scott,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, IT Enterprises Business Services
Division, AES–200.
[FR Doc. 2010–13993 Filed 6–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Scott on (202) 267–9895, or by email at: Carla.Scott@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Title: Certification of Airmen for the
Operation of Light-Sport Aircraft.
Type of Request: Extension without
change of an approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0690.
Forms(s): FAA forms 337, 8610–2,
8110–14, 8110–28, 8710–11.
Affected Public: A total of 57,214
Respondents.
Frequency: The information is
collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden per
Response: Approximately 1.27 hours
per response.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 72,582 hours annually.
Abstract: This rule generates a need
for new designated pilot examiners and
designated airworthiness
representatives to support the
certification of these new aircraft, pilots,
flight instructors, and ground
instructors.
Send comments to the FAA
at the following address: Ms. Carla
Scott, Room 712, Federal Aviation
Administration, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES–200, 800
Independence Ave., SW., Washington,
DC 20591.
Comments Are Invited On: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimates of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2007–28480]
Commercial Driver’s License (CDL)
Standards: Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final dispositions.
SUMMARY: FMCSA has denied National
Agricultural Aviation Association’s
(NAAA) application for exemption, and,
in a separate action, has denied U.S.
Custom Harvesters, Inc.’s (USCHI)
suggestion for a pilot program. Each
request asked FMCSA to permit the
transportation of hazardous materials
(HM) by drivers who have not obtained
an HM endorsement for their
commercial driver’s license (CDL) as
required by current regulations. FMCSA
reviewed NAAA’s application for
exemption and the public comments
received on it, and also reviewed
USCHI’s suggestion for a pilot program,
and rendered each decision upon its
merits.
DATES: The NAAA application was
denied on August 7, 2009, and the
USCHI suggestion for a pilot program
was denied on August 11, 2009.
Dockets: For access to the dockets to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time, or to
Room W12–140, DOT Building, 1200
New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and Carrier
Operations Division, Office of Bus and
Truck Standards and Operations;
Telephone 202–366–4325, E-mail:
MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e),
FMCSA may grant an exemption from
certain of its regulations for a 2-year
period if it finds ‘‘such exemption
would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the
level that would be achieved absent
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32983
such exemption.’’ On July 5, 2007,
FMCSA published in the Federal
Register a notice of NAAA’s application
for exemption (72 FR 36748). The
complete docket of the NAAA request,
including public comments, can be
examined at Docket No. FMCSA–2007–
28480 (see ‘‘Dockets’’ above). A
suggestion for a pilot program, such as
that filed by USCHI, is only published
for public comment if the FMCSA
Administrator accepts the proposal (49
CFR 381.405(b)).
FMCSA Decision
NAAA failed to demonstrate
alternatives its members would employ
to ensure that their commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) drivers operating under
the requested exemption would achieve
a level of safety equivalent to, or greater
than, the level of safety that would be
obtained if they had to comply with the
regulations, as required by 49 CFR
381.305(c)(5). USCHI’s proposed pilot
program, while potentially collecting
useful data for evaluating alternatives to
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs), failed to
recommend alternative safety measures
that would ensure that the safety of its
CMV pilot drivers would be equivalent
to, or greater than, the level of safety of
CMV drivers operating without the pilot
exemptions in place, as required by 49
CFR 381.410(c)(8).
NAAA
NAAA is a trade association
representing those engaged in the
commercial application of fertilizer and
other agricultural products by airplane.
It states that the requested exemption
would relieve the difficulty its members
experience in finding CMV drivers
qualified to transport aircraft fuel, a
hazardous material. The exemption
would allow NAAA drivers to operate
under the limited exception from the
CDL rules provided for those engaged in
certain ‘‘farm-related service industries’’
(49 CFR 383.3(f)). States may allow a
driver so engaged to operate under a
‘‘restricted CDL’’ without successfully
completing the CDL knowledge and
skills tests required by 49 CFR 393.135.
The operations of NAAA members
appear to satisfy several of the
prerequisites for this restricted CDL.
However, States are required by 49 CFR
393.3(f)(3)(v) to restrict the HM
operations conducted by those granted
restricted CDLs to the transport of solid
fertilizers and limited quantities of
diesel fuel or liquid fertilizer. NAAA
wants FMCSA, by exemption, to allow
its drivers holding this restricted CDL to
transport the HM fuels used to power
aircraft engines.
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
32984
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 111 / Thursday, June 10, 2010 / Notices
cprice-sewell on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
FMCSA received 17 comments. Nine
commenters supported NAAA,
primarily because they are experiencing
the same shortage of qualified CDL
drivers described by NAAA in its
application. Five commenters opposed
NAAA’s application, including
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety
and safety agencies of three States. The
commenters pointed out that if this
exemption were in place, NAAA drivers
would be transporting hazardous
materials more dangerous than those
permitted by Section 393.3(f)(3)(v), and
would be doing so without
demonstrating basic competency in
CMV operations. The drivers would also
avoid two requirements for the HM
endorsement: Successful completion of
the written HM test required by 49 CFR
383.135, and a determination of ‘‘not a
security threat,’’ by the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) pursuant
to 49 CFR 383.141(b). The commenters
also pointed out that NAAA failed to
propose an alternative method of
assessing the knowledge and skills of
these CMV drivers, as required by 49
CFR 381.415(c)(6)–(c)(8). FMCSA found
that NAAA failed to demonstrate how it
would ensure that the operations of its
members under the exemption would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level of safety that
would be obtained in the absence of the
exemption.
USCHI
U.S. Custom Harvesters Inc. (USCHI)
is a trade association whose members
engage in specialized farming
operations during the harvest season.
Custom harvesters typically travel from
farm to farm using diesel-powered farm
machinery to harvest crops for clients.
Due to the time-sensitive nature of
harvesting operations, custom
harvesters typically operate for only a
day or two at a farm and move quickly
on to the next farm. In some localities,
diesel fuel distributors are not equipped
to transport diesel fuel, a hazardous
material, to the fields as frequently as
these operations require, so customharvesters bring commercial motor
vehicles (CMVs) with them to transport
the diesel fuel. They hire drivers to
operate the CMVs, but the FMCSRs
require that those operating CMVs
transporting placardable quantities of
diesel fuel have an HM endorsement on
their CDL. USCHI asserts that the
seasonal nature of custom-harvesting
operations provides a very limited
timeframe for the recruitment of the
number of CDL drivers, with HM
endorsement, needed by the customharvesting industry. Many potential
drivers lack only an HM endorsement
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:40 Jun 09, 2010
Jkt 220001
on their CDL. USCHI asserts that too
much time is consumed in taking the
HM test, and obtaining TSA’s ‘‘not-asecurity-threat’’ clearance, to allow them
to be available to drive HM CMV’s when
the custom-harvesting season begins.
USCHI asked FMCSA to conduct a
pilot program under 49 CFR part 381
(subparts C and D) so that its members
could demonstrate that their CMV
drivers can transport placardable
quantities of diesel fuel in support of
custom-harvesting operations safely
without obtaining an HM endorsement;
but the USCHI pilot proposal failed to
include alternative measures to ensure
that safety would not deteriorate if their
CMV drivers were allowed to haul HM
without an HM endorsement. The
design of the pilot program proposed by
USCHI failed to satisfy the safety
performance goals of the FMCSRs, as
required by 49 CFR 381.400(c).
Conclusion
FMCSA carefully reviewed NAAA’s
application for exemption and the
public comments received on it, and
also carefully reviewed USCHI’s
suggestion for a pilot program. The
Agency concluded that the NAAA
application failed to demonstrate how it
would ensure that the operations of its
members under the exemption would
achieve a level of safety equivalent to,
or greater than, the level of safety that
would be obtained in the absence of the
exemption. The Agency concluded that
the USCHI suggestion for a pilot
program failed to satisfy the safety
performance goals of the FMCSRs, as
required by 49 CFR 381.400(c).
Accordingly, FMCSA denied NAAA’s
application for exemption, and USCHI’s
suggestion for a pilot program.
Issued on: June 4, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–13903 Filed 6–9–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0168]
Policy on the Retention of Supporting
Documents and the Use of Electronic
Mobile Communication/Tracking
Technology in Assessing Motor
Carriers’ and Commercial Motor
Vehicle Drivers’ Compliance With the
Hours of Service Regulations
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION: Notice of Regulatory Guidance
and Policy Change.
SUMMARY: The Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration (FMCSA)
provides notice to the motor carrier
industry and the public of regulatory
guidance and policy changes regarding
the retention of supporting documents
and the use of electronic mobile
communication/tracking technology in
assessing motor carriers’ and
commercial motor vehicle drivers’
compliance with the hours of service
regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This change in
policy is effective July 12, 2010.
Comments should be submitted on or
before July 9, 2010. Late-filed comments
will be considered to the extent
practicable.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
(identified by Docket Number FMCSA–
2010–0168) using any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building,
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building, Ground Floor, Room W12–
140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. E.T., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s Privacy Act Statement for
the Federal Docket Management System
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you
may visit https://edocket.access.gpo.gov/
2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David Mancl, Team Leader,
Enforcement and Compliance Division,
MC–ECE, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone: 202–493–0442. Web site
address: https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In 1997, the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), FMCSA’s
predecessor agency, issued a policy
memorandum recognizing that
advanced technologies, which were
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 111 (Thursday, June 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32983-32984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13903]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA-2007-28480]
Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Standards: Exemption
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of final dispositions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA has denied National Agricultural Aviation Association's
(NAAA) application for exemption, and, in a separate action, has denied
U.S. Custom Harvesters, Inc.'s (USCHI) suggestion for a pilot program.
Each request asked FMCSA to permit the transportation of hazardous
materials (HM) by drivers who have not obtained an HM endorsement for
their commercial driver's license (CDL) as required by current
regulations. FMCSA reviewed NAAA's application for exemption and the
public comments received on it, and also reviewed USCHI's suggestion
for a pilot program, and rendered each decision upon its merits.
DATES: The NAAA application was denied on August 7, 2009, and the USCHI
suggestion for a pilot program was denied on August 11, 2009.
Dockets: For access to the dockets to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time, or to
Room W12-140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas Yager, Chief, Driver and
Carrier Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and
Operations; Telephone 202-366-4325, E-mail: MCPSD@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 31315 and 31136(e), FMCSA may grant an exemption
from certain of its regulations for a 2-year period if it finds ``such
exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to,
or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such
exemption.'' On July 5, 2007, FMCSA published in the Federal Register a
notice of NAAA's application for exemption (72 FR 36748). The complete
docket of the NAAA request, including public comments, can be examined
at Docket No. FMCSA-2007-28480 (see ``Dockets'' above). A suggestion
for a pilot program, such as that filed by USCHI, is only published for
public comment if the FMCSA Administrator accepts the proposal (49 CFR
381.405(b)).
FMCSA Decision
NAAA failed to demonstrate alternatives its members would employ to
ensure that their commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers operating
under the requested exemption would achieve a level of safety
equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be
obtained if they had to comply with the regulations, as required by 49
CFR 381.305(c)(5). USCHI's proposed pilot program, while potentially
collecting useful data for evaluating alternatives to the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs), failed to recommend alternative
safety measures that would ensure that the safety of its CMV pilot
drivers would be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety of
CMV drivers operating without the pilot exemptions in place, as
required by 49 CFR 381.410(c)(8).
NAAA
NAAA is a trade association representing those engaged in the
commercial application of fertilizer and other agricultural products by
airplane. It states that the requested exemption would relieve the
difficulty its members experience in finding CMV drivers qualified to
transport aircraft fuel, a hazardous material. The exemption would
allow NAAA drivers to operate under the limited exception from the CDL
rules provided for those engaged in certain ``farm-related service
industries'' (49 CFR 383.3(f)). States may allow a driver so engaged to
operate under a ``restricted CDL'' without successfully completing the
CDL knowledge and skills tests required by 49 CFR 393.135. The
operations of NAAA members appear to satisfy several of the
prerequisites for this restricted CDL. However, States are required by
49 CFR 393.3(f)(3)(v) to restrict the HM operations conducted by those
granted restricted CDLs to the transport of solid fertilizers and
limited quantities of diesel fuel or liquid fertilizer. NAAA wants
FMCSA, by exemption, to allow its drivers holding this restricted CDL
to transport the HM fuels used to power aircraft engines.
[[Page 32984]]
FMCSA received 17 comments. Nine commenters supported NAAA,
primarily because they are experiencing the same shortage of qualified
CDL drivers described by NAAA in its application. Five commenters
opposed NAAA's application, including Advocates for Highway and Auto
Safety and safety agencies of three States. The commenters pointed out
that if this exemption were in place, NAAA drivers would be
transporting hazardous materials more dangerous than those permitted by
Section 393.3(f)(3)(v), and would be doing so without demonstrating
basic competency in CMV operations. The drivers would also avoid two
requirements for the HM endorsement: Successful completion of the
written HM test required by 49 CFR 383.135, and a determination of
``not a security threat,'' by the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) pursuant to 49 CFR 383.141(b). The commenters also
pointed out that NAAA failed to propose an alternative method of
assessing the knowledge and skills of these CMV drivers, as required by
49 CFR 381.415(c)(6)-(c)(8). FMCSA found that NAAA failed to
demonstrate how it would ensure that the operations of its members
under the exemption would achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or
greater than, the level of safety that would be obtained in the absence
of the exemption.
USCHI
U.S. Custom Harvesters Inc. (USCHI) is a trade association whose
members engage in specialized farming operations during the harvest
season. Custom harvesters typically travel from farm to farm using
diesel-powered farm machinery to harvest crops for clients. Due to the
time-sensitive nature of harvesting operations, custom harvesters
typically operate for only a day or two at a farm and move quickly on
to the next farm. In some localities, diesel fuel distributors are not
equipped to transport diesel fuel, a hazardous material, to the fields
as frequently as these operations require, so custom-harvesters bring
commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) with them to transport the diesel
fuel. They hire drivers to operate the CMVs, but the FMCSRs require
that those operating CMVs transporting placardable quantities of diesel
fuel have an HM endorsement on their CDL. USCHI asserts that the
seasonal nature of custom-harvesting operations provides a very limited
timeframe for the recruitment of the number of CDL drivers, with HM
endorsement, needed by the custom-harvesting industry. Many potential
drivers lack only an HM endorsement on their CDL. USCHI asserts that
too much time is consumed in taking the HM test, and obtaining TSA's
``not-a-security-threat'' clearance, to allow them to be available to
drive HM CMV's when the custom-harvesting season begins.
USCHI asked FMCSA to conduct a pilot program under 49 CFR part 381
(subparts C and D) so that its members could demonstrate that their CMV
drivers can transport placardable quantities of diesel fuel in support
of custom-harvesting operations safely without obtaining an HM
endorsement; but the USCHI pilot proposal failed to include alternative
measures to ensure that safety would not deteriorate if their CMV
drivers were allowed to haul HM without an HM endorsement. The design
of the pilot program proposed by USCHI failed to satisfy the safety
performance goals of the FMCSRs, as required by 49 CFR 381.400(c).
Conclusion
FMCSA carefully reviewed NAAA's application for exemption and the
public comments received on it, and also carefully reviewed USCHI's
suggestion for a pilot program. The Agency concluded that the NAAA
application failed to demonstrate how it would ensure that the
operations of its members under the exemption would achieve a level of
safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would
be obtained in the absence of the exemption. The Agency concluded that
the USCHI suggestion for a pilot program failed to satisfy the safety
performance goals of the FMCSRs, as required by 49 CFR 381.400(c).
Accordingly, FMCSA denied NAAA's application for exemption, and USCHI's
suggestion for a pilot program.
Issued on: June 4, 2010.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-13903 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P