Auction of 218-219 MHz Service and Phase II 220 MHz Service Licenses Scheduled for December 7, 2010; Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction 89, 32773-32778 [2010-13880]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
[AU Docket No. 10–107; DA 10–849]
Auction of 218–219 MHz Service and
Phase II 220 MHz Service Licenses
Scheduled for December 7, 2010;
Comment Sought on Competitive
Bidding Procedures for Auction 89
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This document announces the
auction of certain 218–219 MHz and
Phase II 220 MHz Services licenses
scheduled to commence on December 7,
2010 (Auction 89). This document also
seeks comments on competitive bidding
procedures for Auction 89.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
June 15, 2010, and reply comments are
due on or before June 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by AU Docket No. 10–107, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s Web Site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
four copies of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal
Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Attn: WTB/ASAD, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St., SW., Room
TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. All
hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before
entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300
East Hampton Drive, Capitol Heights,
MD 20743.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or telephone: 202–418–0530 or TTY:
202–418–0432.
• The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau requests that a copy of all
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
comments and reply comments be
submitted electronically to the
following address: auction89@fcc.gov.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access Division:
For auction legal questions: Sayuri
Rajapakse at (202) 418–0660; for general
auction questions: Debbie Smith or Lisa
Stover at (717) 338–2868. Mobility
Division: for service rules questions:
Michael Connelly (legal) or Melvin
Spann (technical) at (202) 418–0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Auction 89 Comment
Public Notice released on May 24, 2010.
The complete text of the Auction 89
Comment Public Notice, including
attachments and related Commission
documents, is available for public
inspection and copying from 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday
or from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on
Fridays in the FCC Reference
Information Center, 445 12th Street,
SW., Room CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. The Auction 89 Comment Public
Notice and related Commission
documents also may be purchased from
the Commission’s duplicating
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc.
(BCPI), 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–
B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone
202–488–5300, fax 202–488–5563, or
you may contact BCPI at its Web site:
https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When
ordering documents from BCPI, please
provide the appropriate FCC document
number, for example, DA10–849. The
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice and
related documents also are available on
the Internet at the Commission’s Web
site:
https://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/89/, or
by using the search function for AU
Docket No. 10–107 on the ECFS Web
page at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
I. Introduction
1. The Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau (Bureau) announces an auction
of 218–219 MHz Service licenses and
Phase II 220 MHz Service licenses to
commence on December 7, 2010
designated as Auction 89.
II. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction 89
2. Auction 89 will include a total of
1,868 licenses. These include licenses
for spectrum not previously offered at
auction, licenses that remained unsold
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32773
from a previous auction, licenses on
which a winning bidder in a previous
auction defaulted, and licenses for
spectrum previously associated with
licenses that cancelled or terminated. In
a few cases, the available license does
not cover the entire geographic area or
bandwidth that was covered by a
previously auctioned license due to
partitioning or disaggregation by a
previous licensee. Attachment A of the
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice
provides a complete list of the licenses
that are available in Auction 89.
A. License Descriptions
i. 218–219 MHz Service Licenses
3. Auction 89 will offer 1,420 licenses
in the 218–219 MHz Service: 716 A
Block licenses and 704 B Block licenses
covering a total of 727 Cellular Market
Areas (CMAs).
ii. Phase II 220 MHz Service Licenses
4. Auction 89 will offer 448 Phase II
220 MHz Service licenses, including
444 Economic Area (EA) licenses and 4
Economic Area Grouping (EAG)
licenses, covering a total of 154 separate
EAs and EAGs.
5. Certain licenses being offered in
Auction 89 are available for only part of
the geographic license area because
some previously-auctioned 220 MHz
licenses were partitioned. In addition,
four of these licenses available for only
part of the geographic license area also
cover less bandwidth due to previous
disaggregation. The 220 MHz Service
licenses available in this auction are
listed and are more fully described in
Attachment A of the Auction 89
Comment Public Notice.
B. Incumbency Issues
i. 218–219 MHz Licenses
6. The Commission has authorized
certain site-based, low power operations
on a secondary basis in the 216–220
MHz band. There are also incumbent
geographic area 218–219 MHz Service
licenses in certain CMAs. Additional
information on those licenses may be
found through the Commission’s
Universal Licensing System (ULS),
which is available at https://
wireless.fcc.gov/uls.
ii. 220 MHz Licenses
7. A number of incumbent Phase I
(site-based) 220 MHz licensees are
licensed and operating on frequencies
between 220 and 222 MHz. Such Phase
I incumbents must be protected from
harmful interference by Phase II 220
MHz licensees in accordance with the
Commission’s rules. These limitations
may restrict the ability of Phase II
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32774
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
geographic area licensees to use certain
portions of the electromagnetic
spectrum or provide service to certain
areas in their geographic license areas.
There are also incumbent geographic
area 220 MHz licenses in certain EAs
and EAGs. Additional information on
those licenses may be found through
ULS.
III. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction
Procedures
A. Auction Design
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
i. Auction Format
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all
licenses included in Auction 89 using
the Commission’s standard
simultaneous multiple-round auction
format. This type of auction offers every
license for bid at the same time and
consists of successive bidding rounds in
which eligible bidders may place bids
on individual licenses. Typically,
bidding remains open on all licenses
until bidding stops on every license.
The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal.
ii. Anonymous Bidding
9. The Bureau proposes to conduct
Auction 89 using certain procedures for
limited information disclosure, also
referred to as anonymous bidding.
Specifically, the Bureau proposes to
withhold, until after the close of
bidding, public release of (1) bidders’
license selections on their short-form
applications (FCC Form 175); (2) the
amounts of bidders’ upfront payments
and bidding eligibility; and (3)
information that may reveal the
identities of bidders placing bids and
taking other bidding-related actions.
10. Under these proposed limited
information procedures, the amount of
every bid placed and whether a bid was
withdrawn would be disclosed after the
close of every round, but the identities
of bidders placing or withdrawing
specific bids and the net bid amounts
would not be disclosed until after the
close of the auction.
11. Bidders would have access to
additional information about their own
bids. For example, bidders would be
able to view their own level of
eligibility, before and during the
auction, through the Commission’s
Integrated Spectrum Auction System
(ISAS or FCC Auction System).
12. Moreover, for the purpose of
complying with 47 CFR 1.2105(c), the
Commission’s rule prohibiting certain
communications between applicants,
applicants would be made aware of
other applicants with which they will
not be permitted to cooperate,
collaborate, or communicate, including
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
discussing bids or bidding strategies.
Specifically, the Bureau would notify
separately each applicant in Auction 89
whether applicants with short-form
applications to participate in pending
auctions, including but not limited to
Auction 89, have applied for licenses in
any of the same or overlapping
geographic areas as that applicant.
13. After the close of bidding, bidders’
license selections, upfront payment
amounts, bidding eligibility, bids, and
other bidding-related actions would be
made publicly available.
14. The Bureau seeks comments on its
proposal to implement anonymous
bidding in Auction 89. The Bureau also
seeks comment on alternatives to the
use of anonymous bidding procedures
for Auction 89. When the Commission
proposed limited information disclosure
procedures for the first time, it did so in
response to analysis suggesting that
under certain circumstances the
competitiveness and economic
efficiency of an SMR auction may be
enhanced if such information is
withheld until after the close of the
auction. The Bureau encourages parties
to provide information about the
benefits and costs of complying with
limited information procedures as
compared with the benefits and costs of
alternative procedures that would
provide for the disclosure of more
information on bidder identities and
interests in the auction. If commenters
believe that the Bureau should not
adopt procedures to limit the disclosure
of certain bidder-specific information
until after the auction, they should
explain their reasoning.
B. Auction Structure
i. Round Structure
15. Auction 89 will consist of
sequential bidding rounds. The initial
bidding schedule will be announced in
a public notice to be released at least
one week before the start of the auction.
16. The Commission will conduct
Auction 89 over the Internet, and
telephonic bidding will be available as
well. The toll-free telephone number for
the Auction Bidder Line will be
provided to qualified bidders. The
initial bidding schedule will be
announced in a public notice to be
released at least one week before the
start of the auction.
17. The Bureau proposes to retain the
discretion to change the bidding
schedule in order to foster an auction
pace that reasonably balances speed
with the bidders’ need to study round
results and adjust their bidding
strategies. Under this proposal, the
Bureau may change the amount of time
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for bidding rounds, the amount of time
between rounds, or the number of
rounds per day, depending upon
bidding activity and other factors. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
Commenters may wish to address the
role of the bidding schedule in
managing the pace of the auction and
the tradeoffs in managing auction pace
by bidding schedule changes, by
changing the activity requirements or
bid amount parameters, or by using
other means.
ii. Stopping Rule
18. For Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes to employ a simultaneous
stopping rule approach. A simultaneous
stopping rule means that all licenses
remain available for bidding until
bidding closes simultaneously on all
licenses. More specifically, bidding will
close simultaneously on all licenses
after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a
proactive waiver, or withdraws any
provisionally winning bids. Thus,
unless the Bureau announces alternative
stopping procedures, bidding will
remain open on all licenses until
bidding stops on every license.
Consequently, it is not possible to
determine in advance how long the
auction will last.
19. Further, the Bureau proposes to
retain the discretion to exercise any of
the following options during Auction
89: (1) Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule. The
modified stopping rule would close the
auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a
waiver, withdraws a provisionally
winning bid, or places any new bids on
any license for which it is not the
provisionally winning bidder. Thus,
absent any other bidding activity, a
bidder placing a new bid on a license
for which it is the provisionally winning
bidder would not keep the auction open
under this modified stopping rule; (2)
Declare that the auction will end after
a specified number of additional
rounds. If the Bureau invokes this
special stopping rule, it will accept bids
in the specified final round(s) after
which the auction will close; and (3)
Keep the auction open even if no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a waiver,
or withdraws any provisionally winning
bids. In this event, the effect will be the
same as if a bidder had applied a
waiver. The activity rule, therefore, will
apply as usual and a bidder with
insufficient activity will either lose
bidding eligibility or use a waiver.
20. The Bureau proposes to exercise
these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
auction is proceeding unusually slowly
or quickly, there is minimal overall
bidding activity, or it appears likely that
the auction will not close within a
reasonable period of time or will close
prematurely. Before exercising certain of
these options, the Bureau is likely to
attempt to change the pace of the
auction by, for example, changing the
number of bidding rounds per day and/
or changing minimum acceptable bids.
The Bureau proposes to retain the
discretion to exercise any of these
options with or without prior
announcement during the auction. The
Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
iii. Information Relating to Auction
Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
21. For Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes that, by public notice or by
announcement during the auction, the
Bureau may delay, suspend, or cancel
the auction in the event of natural
disaster, technical obstacle,
administrative or weather necessity,
evidence of an auction security breach
or unlawful bidding activity, or for any
other reason that affects the fair and
efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. In such cases, the Bureau, in its
sole discretion, may elect to resume the
auction starting from the beginning of
the current round, resume the auction
starting from some previous round, or
cancel the auction in its entirety.
Network interruption may cause the
Bureau to delay or suspend the auction.
The Bureau emphasizes that exercise of
this authority is solely within the
discretion of the Bureau, and its use is
not intended to be a substitute for
situations in which bidders may wish to
apply their activity rule waivers. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
C. Auction Procedures
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding
Eligibility
22. For Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes to make the upfront payments
equal to the minimum opening bids.
The specific upfront payments for each
license are listed in Attachment A of the
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
23. The Bureau further proposes that
the amount of the upfront payment
submitted by a bidder will determine
the bidder’s initial bidding eligibility in
bidding units. The Bureau proposes that
each license be assigned a specific
number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed for the license,
on a bidding unit per dollar basis. The
specific bidding units for each license
are listed in Attachment A of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice. The
number of bidding units for a given
license is fixed and does not change
during the auction as prices rise. A
bidder’s upfront payment is not
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a
bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its
short-form application (FCC Form 175)
as long as the total number of bidding
units associated with those licenses
does not exceed its current eligibility.
24. Eligibility cannot be increased
during the auction; it can only remain
the same or decrease. Thus, in
calculating its upfront payment amount
and hence its initial bidding eligibility,
an applicant must determine the
maximum number of bidding units it
may wish to bid on (or hold
provisionally winning bids on) in any
single round, and submit an upfront
payment amount covering that total
number of bidding units. Provisionally
winning bids are bids that would
become final winning bids if the auction
were to close in that given round. The
Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
25. In order to ensure that the auction
closes within a reasonable period of
time, an activity rule requires bidders to
bid actively throughout the auction,
rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder’s activity
in a round will be the sum of the
bidding units associated with any
licenses upon which it places bids
during the current round and the
bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally
winning bids. Bidders are required to be
active on a specific percentage of their
current bidding eligibility during each
round of the auction. Failure to
maintain the requisite activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in
the bidder’s eligibility, possibly
curtailing or eliminating the bidder’s
ability to place additional bids in the
auction.
26. The Bureau proposes to divide the
auction into at least two stages, each
characterized by a different activity
requirement. The auction will start in
Stage One. The Bureau proposes to
advance the auction to the next stage by
announcement during the auction. In
exercising this discretion, the Bureau
will consider a variety of measures of
auction activity, including but not
limited to the percentage of licenses (as
measured in bidding units) on which
there are new bids, the number of new
bids, and the increase in revenue. The
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32775
Bureau seeks comment on these
proposals.
27. The Bureau proposes the
following activity requirements, while
noting again that the Bureau retains the
discretion to change stages unilaterally
by announcement during the auction. In
each round of the first stage of the
auction (Stage One), a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on licenses
representing at least 80 percent of its
current bidding eligibility. Failure to
maintain the required activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver or a reduction in the bidder’s
bidding eligibility for the next round of
bidding. During Stage One, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by fivefourths (5⁄4). In each round of the second
stage (Stage Two), a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on 95 percent of
its current bidding eligibility. Failure to
maintain the required activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver or a reduction in the bidder’s
bidding eligibility for the next round of
bidding. During Stage Two, a bidder’s
reduced eligibility for the next round
will be calculated by multiplying the
bidder’s current round activity by
twenty-nineteenths (20/19).
28. Under this proposal, the Bureau
will retain the discretion to change the
activity requirements during the
auction. For example, the Bureau could
decide not to transition to Stage Two if
it believes the auction is progressing
satisfactorily under the Stage One
activity requirement, to transition to
Stage Two with an activity requirement
that is higher or lower than the 95
percent proposed herein, or to add an
additional stage with a higher activity
requirement. If the Bureau exercises this
discretion, it will alert bidders by
announcement in the FCC Auction
System.
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing
Eligibility
29. Use of an activity rule waiver
preserves the bidder’s eligibility despite
the bidder’s activity in the current
round being below the required
minimum level. An activity rule waiver
applies to an entire round of bidding,
not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or
automatic and are principally a
mechanism for bidders to avoid the loss
of bidding eligibility in the event that
exigent circumstances prevent them
from bidding in a particular round. The
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice
provides additional, more detailed
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32776
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
information on how activity rule
waivers operate.
30. The Bureau proposes that each
bidder in Auction 89 be provided with
three activity rule waivers that may be
used at the bidder’s discretion during
the course of the auction. The Bureau
seeks comment on this proposal.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening
Bids
31. A reserve price is an absolute
minimum price below which an item
will not be sold. Reserve prices can be
either published or unpublished. A
minimum opening bid, on the other
hand, is the minimum bid price set at
the beginning of the auction below
which no bids are accepted. It is
generally used to accelerate the
competitive bidding process. Also, the
auctioneer may have the discretion to
lower the minimum opening bid
amount later in the auction. It is also
possible for the minimum opening bid
and the reserve price to be the same
amount.
32. The Bureau proposes to establish
minimum opening bid amounts for
Auction 89. The Bureau believes a
minimum opening bid amount, which
has been used in other auctions, is an
effective bidding tool for accelerating
the competitive bidding process. The
Bureau does not propose a separate
reserve price for the licenses to be
offered in Auction 89.
a. 218–219 MHz Licenses
33. For 218–219 MHz licenses offered
in Auction 89, the Bureau proposes to
calculate minimum opening bid
amounts on a license-by-license basis
using a formula based on bandwidth
and license area population: $.01 * MHz
* license area population with a
minimum of $500 per license.
34. The resulting minimum opening
bid amount proposed for each 218–219
MHz license available in Auction 89 is
set forth in Attachment A of the Auction
89 Comment Public Notice.
b. 220 MHz Licenses
35. For 220 MHz licenses offered in
Auction 89, the Bureau proposes to
calculate minimum opening bid
amounts on a license-by-license basis as
follows: EA Licenses $500 per license;
and EAG Licenses $0.01 * MHz *
license area population.
36. The minimum opening bid
amount proposed for each 220 MHz
license available in Auction 89 is set
forth in Attachment A of the Auction 89
Comment Public Notice.
37. The Bureau seeks comment on its
proposals concerning minimum opening
bids. If commenters believe that these
minimum opening bid amounts will
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
deter substantial numbers of bidders
from placing bids on licenses, or are not
reasonable amounts, or should instead
operate as a reserve price, they should
explain why this is so, and comment on
the desirability of an alternative
approach. Commenters are advised to
support their claims with valuation
analyses and suggested reserve prices or
minimum opening bid amount levels or
formulas. In establishing minimum
opening bid amounts, the Bureau
particularly seeks comment on such
factors as the amount of spectrum being
auctioned, levels of incumbency within
these spectrum bands, the availability of
technology to provide service, the size
of the service areas, issues of
interference with other spectrum bands
and any other relevant factors that could
reasonably have an impact on valuation
of the licenses being auctioned. The
Bureau seeks comment on this
approach, and on whether, consistent
with Section 309(j), the public interest
would be served by having no minimum
opening bid amount or reserve price.
v. Bid Amounts
38. The Bureau proposes that, in each
round, eligible bidders be able to place
a bid on a given license using one or
more pre-defined bid amounts. Under
this proposal, the FCC Auction System
interface will list the acceptable bid
amounts for each license. The Bureau
proposes to calculate bid amounts.
a. Minimum Acceptable Bids
39. The first of the acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a license will
be equal to its minimum opening bid
amount until there is a provisionally
winning bid on the license. After there
is a provisionally winning bid for a
license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to
the amount of the provisionally winning
bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula. In general,
the percentage will be higher for a
license receiving many bids than for a
license receiving few bids. In the case of
a license for which the provisionally
winning bid has been withdrawn, the
minimum acceptable bid amount will
equal the second highest bid received
for the license.
40. The percentage of the
provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid
amount (the additional percentage) is
calculated at the end of each round,
based on an activity index. The activity
index is a weighted average of (a) the
number of distinct bidders placing a bid
on the license, and (b) the activity index
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
from the prior round. Specifically, the
activity index is equal to a weighting
factor times the number of bidders
placing a bid covering the license in the
most recent bidding round plus one
minus the weighting factor times the
activity index from the prior round. The
additional percentage is determined as
one plus the activity index times a
minimum percentage amount, with the
result not to exceed a given maximum.
The additional percentage is then
multiplied by the provisionally winning
bid amount to obtain the minimum
acceptable bid for the next round. The
Bureau proposes initially to set the
weighting factor at 0.5, the minimum
percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the
maximum percentage at 0.3 (30%).
Hence, at these initial settings, the
minimum acceptable bid for a license
will be between ten percent and thirty
percent higher than the provisionally
winning bid, depending upon the
bidding activity for the license.
Equations and examples are shown in
Attachment B of the Auction 89
Comment Public Notice.
b. Additional Bid Amounts
41. The Bureau proposes to allow no
additional bid amounts per license.
Thus, the minimum acceptable bid
would be the only bid amount available
in the FCC Auction System interface for
each license. The Bureau seeks
comment on this proposal. The Bureau
also seeks comment on whether, in the
alternative, to allow more bid amounts
per license in a given round, and if so,
how many—up to a maximum of eight
additional bid amounts (for a total of
nine bid amounts). In particular,
commenters should address the issue of
additional bid amounts in light of
particular circumstances of Auction 89,
including the nature of the license
inventory.
42. If the Bureau allows additional bid
amounts, it proposes to calculate any
additional bid amounts using the
minimum acceptable bid amount and a
bid increment percentage—more
specifically, by multiplying the
minimum acceptable bid by one plus
successively higher multiples of the bid
increment percentage. If, for example,
the bid increment percentage is five
percent, the calculation of the first
additional acceptable bid amount is
(minimum acceptable bid amount) * (1
+ 0.05), or (minimum acceptable bid
amount) * 1.05; the second additional
acceptable bid amount equals the
minimum acceptable bid amount times
one plus two times the bid increment
percentage, or (minimum acceptable bid
amount) * 1.1, etc. If the Bureau allows
additional bid amounts, it proposes to
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
set the bid increment percentage at 0.05
(5%).
43. The Bureau retains the discretion
to change the minimum acceptable bid
amounts, the number of acceptable bid
amounts, the additional bid amounts,
and the parameters of the formulas used
to calculate minimum acceptable bid
amounts and additional bid amounts if
the Bureau determines that
circumstances so dictate. Further, the
Bureau retains the discretion to make
such changes on a license-by-license
basis.
44. The Bureau also retains the
discretion to limit (a) the amount by
which a minimum acceptable bid for a
license may increase compared with the
corresponding provisionally winning
bid, and (b) the amount by which any
additional bid amount may increase
compared with the immediately
preceding acceptable bid amount. For
example, the Bureau could set a $1
million limit on increases in minimum
acceptable bid amounts over
provisionally winning bids. Thus, if the
activity-based formula calculates a
minimum acceptable bid amount that is
$2 million higher than the provisionally
winning bid on a license, the minimum
acceptable bid amount would instead be
capped at $1 million above the
provisionally winning bid. The Bureau
seeks comment on the circumstances
under which the Bureau should employ
such a limit, factors it should consider
when determining the dollar amount of
the limit, and the tradeoffs in setting
such a limit or changing parameters of
the activity-based formula, such as
changing the minimum percentage. If
the Bureau exercises this discretion, it
will alert bidders by announcement in
the FCC Auction System.
45. The Bureau seeks comment on its
proposals. Commenters may wish to
address the role of the minimum
acceptable bids and the number of
acceptable bid amounts in managing the
pace of the auction and the tradeoffs in
managing auction pace by changing the
bidding schedule, activity requirements,
or bid amount parameters, or by using
other means.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
46. Provisionally winning bids are
bids that would become final winning
bids if the auction were to close in that
given round. At the end of a bidding
round, a provisionally winning bid for
each license will be determined based
on the highest bid amount received for
the license. In the event of identical
high bid amounts being submitted on a
license in a given round (i.e., tied bids),
the Bureau will use a random number
generator to select a single provisionally
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
winning bid from among the tied bids.
(Each bid is assigned a random number,
and the tied bid with the highest
random number wins the tiebreaker.)
The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can
submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to
end with no other bids being placed, the
winning bidder would be the one that
placed the provisionally winning bid. If
any bids are received on the license in
a subsequent round, the provisionally
winning bid again will be determined
by the highest bid amount received for
the license.
47. A provisionally winning bid will
remain the provisionally winning bid
until there is a higher bid on the license
at the close of a subsequent round,
unless the provisionally winning bid is
withdrawn. Bidders are reminded that
provisionally winning bids count
toward activity for purposes of the
activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal
48. For Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes and seeks comment on the
following bid removal procedures.
Before the close of a bidding round, a
bidder has the option of removing any
bid placed in that round. By removing
selected bids in the FCC Auction
System, a bidder may effectively undo
any of its bids placed within that round.
In contrast to the bid withdrawal
provisions, a bidder removing a bid
placed in the same round is not subject
to a withdrawal payment. Once a round
closes, a bidder may no longer remove
a bid.
viii. Bid Withdrawal
49. A bidder may withdraw its
provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC
Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning
bid(s) is subject to the bid withdrawal
payment provisions of the Commission
rules.
50. For Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes to limit each bidder to
withdrawing provisionally winning bids
in only one round during the course of
the auction. To permit a bidder to
withdraw bids in more than one round
may encourage insincere bidding or the
use of withdrawals for anti-competitive
purposes. The round in which
withdrawals may be used will be at the
bidder’s discretion, and there is no limit
on the number of provisionally winning
bids that may be withdrawn during that
round. Withdrawals must be in
accordance with the Commission’s
rules, and are subject to the bid
withdrawal payment provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32777
specified in 47 CFR 1.2104(g). The
Bureau seeks comment on these bid
withdrawal procedures. If commenters
believe that each bidder should be
allowed to withdraw provisionally
winning bids in more than one round
during the course of the auction, or
should not be permitted to withdraw
any bids, they should state how many
bid withdrawal rounds they seek and
explain what specific factors lead them
to that conclusion.
D. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal
Payment Percentage
51. The Bureau seeks comment on the
appropriate percentage of a withdrawn
bid that should be assessed as an
interim withdrawal payment in the
event that a final withdrawal payment
cannot be determined at the close of the
auction. In general, the Commission’s
rules provide that a bidder that
withdraws a bid during an auction is
subject to a withdrawal payment equal
to the difference between the amount of
the withdrawn bid and the amount of
the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). If a bid is
withdrawn and no subsequent higher
bid is placed and/or the license is not
won in the same auction, the final
withdrawal payment cannot be
calculated until after the close of a
subsequent auction in which a higher
bid for the license (or the equivalent to
the license) is placed or the license is
won. When that final payment cannot
yet be calculated, the bidder that
withdrew the bid is assessed an interim
bid withdrawal payment, which will be
applied toward any final bid withdrawal
payment that is ultimately assessed.
Section 1.2104(g)(1) of the Commission
rules requires that the percentage of the
withdrawn bid to be assessed as an
interim bid withdrawal payment be
between three percent and twenty
percent and that it be set in advance of
the auction.
52. The Commission has determined
that the level of the interim withdrawal
payment in a particular auction will be
based on the nature of the service and
the inventory of the licenses being
offered. The Commission has noted that
it may impose a higher interim
withdrawal payment percentage to deter
the anti-competitive use of withdrawals
when, for example, bidders likely will
not need to aggregate the licenses being
offered in the auction, such as when few
licenses are offered that are on adjacent
frequencies or in adjacent areas, or
when there are few synergies to be
captured by combining licenses.
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
32778
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Notices
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
53. With respect to the licenses being
offered in Auction 89, the service rules
permit a variety of fixed, mobile, and
paging services, though the
opportunities for combining licenses on
adjacent frequencies or in adjacent areas
are limited in some cases. Balancing the
potential need for bidders to use
withdrawals to avoid winning
incomplete combinations of licenses
with the Bureau’s interest in deterring
undesirable strategic use of
withdrawals, the Bureau proposes a
percentage below the maximum twenty
percent permitted under the current
rules but above the three percent
previously provided by the
Commission’s rules. Specifically, the
Bureau proposes to establish an interim
bid withdrawal payment of ten percent
of the withdrawn bid for this auction.
The Bureau seeks comment on this
proposal. If commenters advocate the
use of a different percentage they should
provide relevant support including
information on the likelihood that
bidders will need to aggregate licenses
on adjacent frequencies or in adjacent
areas.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default
Payment Percentage
54. Any winning bidder that, after the
close of an auction, defaults—by, for
example, failing to remit the required
down payment within the prescribed
period of time, failing to submit a timely
long-form application, or failing to make
full payment—or is otherwise
disqualified is liable for a default
payment under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2).
This payment consists of a deficiency
payment, equal to the difference
between the amount of the bidder’s bid
and the amount of the winning bid the
next time a license covering the same
spectrum is won in an auction, plus an
additional payment equal to a
percentage of the defaulter’s bid or of
the subsequent winning bid, whichever
is less.
55. Section 1.2104(g)(2) of the
Commission’s rules provides that in
advance of each auction without
combinatorial or package bidding,
establish an additional default payment
for that auction of three percent up to
a maximum of twenty percent. The level
of this payment in each case will be
based on the nature of the service and
the inventory of the licenses being
offered.
56. As previously noted by the
Commission, defaults weaken the
integrity of the auction process and
impede the deployment of service to the
public, and an additional default
payment of more than three percent will
be more effective in deterring defaults.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:10 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
Given the history of these services and
the inventory of the licenses being
offered in Auction 89, the Bureau
believes that an additional default
payment percentage of fifteen percent
will provide a sufficient deterrent to
defaults. The Bureau seeks comment on
this proposal.
IV. Ex Parte Rules
57. This proceeding has been
designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the
Commission’s ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing
the presentations must contain
summaries of the substance of the
presentations and not merely a listing of
the subjects discussed. More than a one
or two sentence description of the views
and arguments presented is generally
required. Other rules pertaining to oral
and written ex parte presentations in
permit-but-disclose proceedings are set
forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. 2010–13880 Filed 6–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
FDIC Advisory Committee on
Economic Inclusion (ComE-IN); Notice
of Meeting
AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC).
ACTION: Notice of open meeting.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice
is hereby given of a meeting of the FDIC
Advisory Committee on Economic
Inclusion, which will be held in
Washington, DC. The Advisory
Committee will provide advice and
recommendations on initiatives to
expand access to banking services by
underserved populations.
DATES: Thursday, June 24, 2010, from
8:45 a.m. to 4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
the FDIC Board Room on the sixth floor
of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for further information
concerning the meeting may be directed
to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Committee
Management Officer of the FDIC, at
(202) 898–7043.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Agenda: The agenda will be focused
on the Small Dollar Loan Pilot Program,
Safe Transactional and Savings Account
Proposed Templates, and Policy and
Project Updates. The agenda may be
subject to change. Any changes to the
agenda will be announced at the
beginning of the meeting.
Type of Meeting: The meeting will be
open to the public, limited only by the
space available on a first-come, firstserved basis. For security reasons,
members of the public will be subject to
security screening procedures and must
present a valid photo identification to
enter the building. The FDIC will
provide attendees with auxiliary aids
(e.g., sign language interpretation)
required for this meeting. Those
attendees needing such assistance
should call (703) 562–6067 (Voice or
TTY) at least two days before the
meeting to make necessary
arrangements. Written statements may
be filed with the committee before or
after the meeting. This ComE-IN
meeting will be Webcast live via the
Internet at: https://www.vodium.com/
goto/fdic/advisorycommittee.asp. This
service is free and available to anyone
with the following systems
requirements: https://www.vodium.com/
home/sysreq.html. Adobe Flash Player
is required to view these presentations.
The latest version of Adobe Flash Player
can be downloaded at https://
www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/
download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=
ShockwaveFlash. Installation questions
or troubleshooting help can be found at
the same link. For optimal viewing, a
high speed internet connection is
recommended. The ComE-IN meeting
videos are made available on-demand
approximately two weeks after the
event.
Dated: June 4, 2010.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary, Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2010–13846 Filed 6–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisition of Shares of Bank or Bank
Holding Companies
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank
holding company. The factors that are
considered in acting on the notices are
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32773-32778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13880]
[[Page 32773]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[AU Docket No. 10-107; DA 10-849]
Auction of 218-219 MHz Service and Phase II 220 MHz Service
Licenses Scheduled for December 7, 2010; Comment Sought on Competitive
Bidding Procedures for Auction 89
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces the auction of certain 218-219 MHz and
Phase II 220 MHz Services licenses scheduled to commence on December 7,
2010 (Auction 89). This document also seeks comments on competitive
bidding procedures for Auction 89.
DATES: Comments are due on or before June 15, 2010, and reply comments
are due on or before June 29, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by AU Docket No. 10-107,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's Web Site: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and four copies of each filing. Filings can be sent by
hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by
first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Attn: WTB/ASAD, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St., SW., Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. All hand
deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes must be disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9300 East Hampton
Drive, Capitol Heights, MD 20743.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or telephone: 202-
418-0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau requests that a
copy of all comments and reply comments be submitted electronically to
the following address: auction89@fcc.gov.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by e-mail: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wireless Telecommunications Bureau,
Auctions and Spectrum Access Division: For auction legal questions:
Sayuri Rajapakse at (202) 418-0660; for general auction questions:
Debbie Smith or Lisa Stover at (717) 338-2868. Mobility Division: for
service rules questions: Michael Connelly (legal) or Melvin Spann
(technical) at (202) 418-0620.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Auction 89 Comment
Public Notice released on May 24, 2010. The complete text of the
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice, including attachments and related
Commission documents, is available for public inspection and copying
from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET Monday through Thursday or from 8 a.m. to
11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference Information Center, 445
12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The Auction 89
Comment Public Notice and related Commission documents also may be
purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc. (BCPI), 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington,
DC 20554, telephone 202-488-5300, fax 202-488-5563, or you may contact
BCPI at its Web site: https://www.BCPIWEB.com. When ordering documents
from BCPI, please provide the appropriate FCC document number, for
example, DA10-849. The Auction 89 Comment Public Notice and related
documents also are available on the Internet at the Commission's Web
site: https://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/89/, or by using the search
function for AU Docket No. 10-107 on the ECFS Web page at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
I. Introduction
1. The Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (Bureau) announces an
auction of 218-219 MHz Service licenses and Phase II 220 MHz Service
licenses to commence on December 7, 2010 designated as Auction 89.
II. Licenses To Be Offered in Auction 89
2. Auction 89 will include a total of 1,868 licenses. These include
licenses for spectrum not previously offered at auction, licenses that
remained unsold from a previous auction, licenses on which a winning
bidder in a previous auction defaulted, and licenses for spectrum
previously associated with licenses that cancelled or terminated. In a
few cases, the available license does not cover the entire geographic
area or bandwidth that was covered by a previously auctioned license
due to partitioning or disaggregation by a previous licensee.
Attachment A of the Auction 89 Comment Public Notice provides a
complete list of the licenses that are available in Auction 89.
A. License Descriptions
i. 218-219 MHz Service Licenses
3. Auction 89 will offer 1,420 licenses in the 218-219 MHz Service:
716 A Block licenses and 704 B Block licenses covering a total of 727
Cellular Market Areas (CMAs).
ii. Phase II 220 MHz Service Licenses
4. Auction 89 will offer 448 Phase II 220 MHz Service licenses,
including 444 Economic Area (EA) licenses and 4 Economic Area Grouping
(EAG) licenses, covering a total of 154 separate EAs and EAGs.
5. Certain licenses being offered in Auction 89 are available for
only part of the geographic license area because some previously-
auctioned 220 MHz licenses were partitioned. In addition, four of these
licenses available for only part of the geographic license area also
cover less bandwidth due to previous disaggregation. The 220 MHz
Service licenses available in this auction are listed and are more
fully described in Attachment A of the Auction 89 Comment Public
Notice.
B. Incumbency Issues
i. 218-219 MHz Licenses
6. The Commission has authorized certain site-based, low power
operations on a secondary basis in the 216-220 MHz band. There are also
incumbent geographic area 218-219 MHz Service licenses in certain CMAs.
Additional information on those licenses may be found through the
Commission's Universal Licensing System (ULS), which is available at
https://wireless.fcc.gov/uls.
ii. 220 MHz Licenses
7. A number of incumbent Phase I (site-based) 220 MHz licensees are
licensed and operating on frequencies between 220 and 222 MHz. Such
Phase I incumbents must be protected from harmful interference by Phase
II 220 MHz licensees in accordance with the Commission's rules. These
limitations may restrict the ability of Phase II
[[Page 32774]]
geographic area licensees to use certain portions of the
electromagnetic spectrum or provide service to certain areas in their
geographic license areas. There are also incumbent geographic area 220
MHz licenses in certain EAs and EAGs. Additional information on those
licenses may be found through ULS.
III. Bureau Seeks Comment on Auction Procedures
A. Auction Design
i. Auction Format
8. The Bureau proposes to auction all licenses included in Auction
89 using the Commission's standard simultaneous multiple-round auction
format. This type of auction offers every license for bid at the same
time and consists of successive bidding rounds in which eligible
bidders may place bids on individual licenses. Typically, bidding
remains open on all licenses until bidding stops on every license. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
ii. Anonymous Bidding
9. The Bureau proposes to conduct Auction 89 using certain
procedures for limited information disclosure, also referred to as
anonymous bidding. Specifically, the Bureau proposes to withhold, until
after the close of bidding, public release of (1) bidders' license
selections on their short-form applications (FCC Form 175); (2) the
amounts of bidders' upfront payments and bidding eligibility; and (3)
information that may reveal the identities of bidders placing bids and
taking other bidding-related actions.
10. Under these proposed limited information procedures, the amount
of every bid placed and whether a bid was withdrawn would be disclosed
after the close of every round, but the identities of bidders placing
or withdrawing specific bids and the net bid amounts would not be
disclosed until after the close of the auction.
11. Bidders would have access to additional information about their
own bids. For example, bidders would be able to view their own level of
eligibility, before and during the auction, through the Commission's
Integrated Spectrum Auction System (ISAS or FCC Auction System).
12. Moreover, for the purpose of complying with 47 CFR 1.2105(c),
the Commission's rule prohibiting certain communications between
applicants, applicants would be made aware of other applicants with
which they will not be permitted to cooperate, collaborate, or
communicate, including discussing bids or bidding strategies.
Specifically, the Bureau would notify separately each applicant in
Auction 89 whether applicants with short-form applications to
participate in pending auctions, including but not limited to Auction
89, have applied for licenses in any of the same or overlapping
geographic areas as that applicant.
13. After the close of bidding, bidders' license selections,
upfront payment amounts, bidding eligibility, bids, and other bidding-
related actions would be made publicly available.
14. The Bureau seeks comments on its proposal to implement
anonymous bidding in Auction 89. The Bureau also seeks comment on
alternatives to the use of anonymous bidding procedures for Auction 89.
When the Commission proposed limited information disclosure procedures
for the first time, it did so in response to analysis suggesting that
under certain circumstances the competitiveness and economic efficiency
of an SMR auction may be enhanced if such information is withheld until
after the close of the auction. The Bureau encourages parties to
provide information about the benefits and costs of complying with
limited information procedures as compared with the benefits and costs
of alternative procedures that would provide for the disclosure of more
information on bidder identities and interests in the auction. If
commenters believe that the Bureau should not adopt procedures to limit
the disclosure of certain bidder-specific information until after the
auction, they should explain their reasoning.
B. Auction Structure
i. Round Structure
15. Auction 89 will consist of sequential bidding rounds. The
initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public notice to be
released at least one week before the start of the auction.
16. The Commission will conduct Auction 89 over the Internet, and
telephonic bidding will be available as well. The toll-free telephone
number for the Auction Bidder Line will be provided to qualified
bidders. The initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public
notice to be released at least one week before the start of the
auction.
17. The Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to change the
bidding schedule in order to foster an auction pace that reasonably
balances speed with the bidders' need to study round results and adjust
their bidding strategies. Under this proposal, the Bureau may change
the amount of time for bidding rounds, the amount of time between
rounds, or the number of rounds per day, depending upon bidding
activity and other factors. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
Commenters may wish to address the role of the bidding schedule in
managing the pace of the auction and the tradeoffs in managing auction
pace by bidding schedule changes, by changing the activity requirements
or bid amount parameters, or by using other means.
ii. Stopping Rule
18. For Auction 89, the Bureau proposes to employ a simultaneous
stopping rule approach. A simultaneous stopping rule means that all
licenses remain available for bidding until bidding closes
simultaneously on all licenses. More specifically, bidding will close
simultaneously on all licenses after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bids, applies a proactive waiver, or withdraws any
provisionally winning bids. Thus, unless the Bureau announces
alternative stopping procedures, bidding will remain open on all
licenses until bidding stops on every license. Consequently, it is not
possible to determine in advance how long the auction will last.
19. Further, the Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to
exercise any of the following options during Auction 89: (1) Use a
modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule. The modified
stopping rule would close the auction for all licenses after the first
round in which no bidder applies a waiver, withdraws a provisionally
winning bid, or places any new bids on any license for which it is not
the provisionally winning bidder. Thus, absent any other bidding
activity, a bidder placing a new bid on a license for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (2) Declare that the auction will end after a
specified number of additional rounds. If the Bureau invokes this
special stopping rule, it will accept bids in the specified final
round(s) after which the auction will close; and (3) Keep the auction
open even if no bidder submits any new bids, applies a waiver, or
withdraws any provisionally winning bids. In this event, the effect
will be the same as if a bidder had applied a waiver. The activity
rule, therefore, will apply as usual and a bidder with insufficient
activity will either lose bidding eligibility or use a waiver.
20. The Bureau proposes to exercise these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
[[Page 32775]]
auction is proceeding unusually slowly or quickly, there is minimal
overall bidding activity, or it appears likely that the auction will
not close within a reasonable period of time or will close prematurely.
Before exercising certain of these options, the Bureau is likely to
attempt to change the pace of the auction by, for example, changing the
number of bidding rounds per day and/or changing minimum acceptable
bids. The Bureau proposes to retain the discretion to exercise any of
these options with or without prior announcement during the auction.
The Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
iii. Information Relating to Auction Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
21. For Auction 89, the Bureau proposes that, by public notice or
by announcement during the auction, the Bureau may delay, suspend, or
cancel the auction in the event of natural disaster, technical
obstacle, administrative or weather necessity, evidence of an auction
security breach or unlawful bidding activity, or for any other reason
that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive bidding. In
such cases, the Bureau, in its sole discretion, may elect to resume the
auction starting from the beginning of the current round, resume the
auction starting from some previous round, or cancel the auction in its
entirety. Network interruption may cause the Bureau to delay or suspend
the auction. The Bureau emphasizes that exercise of this authority is
solely within the discretion of the Bureau, and its use is not intended
to be a substitute for situations in which bidders may wish to apply
their activity rule waivers. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
C. Auction Procedures
i. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility
22. For Auction 89, the Bureau proposes to make the upfront
payments equal to the minimum opening bids. The specific upfront
payments for each license are listed in Attachment A of the Auction 89
Comment Public Notice. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
23. The Bureau further proposes that the amount of the upfront
payment submitted by a bidder will determine the bidder's initial
bidding eligibility in bidding units. The Bureau proposes that each
license be assigned a specific number of bidding units equal to the
upfront payment listed for the license, on a bidding unit per dollar
basis. The specific bidding units for each license are listed in
Attachment A of the Auction 89 Comment Public Notice. The number of
bidding units for a given license is fixed and does not change during
the auction as prices rise. A bidder's upfront payment is not
attributed to specific licenses. Rather, a bidder may place bids on any
combination of licenses it selected on its short-form application (FCC
Form 175) as long as the total number of bidding units associated with
those licenses does not exceed its current eligibility.
24. Eligibility cannot be increased during the auction; it can only
remain the same or decrease. Thus, in calculating its upfront payment
amount and hence its initial bidding eligibility, an applicant must
determine the maximum number of bidding units it may wish to bid on (or
hold provisionally winning bids on) in any single round, and submit an
upfront payment amount covering that total number of bidding units.
Provisionally winning bids are bids that would become final winning
bids if the auction were to close in that given round. The Bureau seeks
comment on these proposals.
ii. Activity Rule
25. In order to ensure that the auction closes within a reasonable
period of time, an activity rule requires bidders to bid actively
throughout the auction, rather than wait until late in the auction
before participating. A bidder's activity in a round will be the sum of
the bidding units associated with any licenses upon which it places
bids during the current round and the bidding units associated with any
licenses for which it holds provisionally winning bids. Bidders are
required to be active on a specific percentage of their current bidding
eligibility during each round of the auction. Failure to maintain the
requisite activity level will result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in the bidder's eligibility,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the bidder's ability to place
additional bids in the auction.
26. The Bureau proposes to divide the auction into at least two
stages, each characterized by a different activity requirement. The
auction will start in Stage One. The Bureau proposes to advance the
auction to the next stage by announcement during the auction. In
exercising this discretion, the Bureau will consider a variety of
measures of auction activity, including but not limited to the
percentage of licenses (as measured in bidding units) on which there
are new bids, the number of new bids, and the increase in revenue. The
Bureau seeks comment on these proposals.
27. The Bureau proposes the following activity requirements, while
noting again that the Bureau retains the discretion to change stages
unilaterally by announcement during the auction. In each round of the
first stage of the auction (Stage One), a bidder desiring to maintain
its current bidding eligibility is required to be active on licenses
representing at least 80 percent of its current bidding eligibility.
Failure to maintain the required activity level will result in the use
of an activity rule waiver or a reduction in the bidder's bidding
eligibility for the next round of bidding. During Stage One, a bidder's
reduced eligibility for the next round will be calculated by
multiplying the bidder's current round activity by five-fourths (\5/
4\). In each round of the second stage (Stage Two), a bidder desiring
to maintain its current bidding eligibility is required to be active on
95 percent of its current bidding eligibility. Failure to maintain the
required activity level will result in the use of an activity rule
waiver or a reduction in the bidder's bidding eligibility for the next
round of bidding. During Stage Two, a bidder's reduced eligibility for
the next round will be calculated by multiplying the bidder's current
round activity by twenty-nineteenths (20/19).
28. Under this proposal, the Bureau will retain the discretion to
change the activity requirements during the auction. For example, the
Bureau could decide not to transition to Stage Two if it believes the
auction is progressing satisfactorily under the Stage One activity
requirement, to transition to Stage Two with an activity requirement
that is higher or lower than the 95 percent proposed herein, or to add
an additional stage with a higher activity requirement. If the Bureau
exercises this discretion, it will alert bidders by announcement in the
FCC Auction System.
iii. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing Eligibility
29. Use of an activity rule waiver preserves the bidder's
eligibility despite the bidder's activity in the current round being
below the required minimum level. An activity rule waiver applies to an
entire round of bidding, not to particular licenses. Activity rule
waivers can be either proactive or automatic and are principally a
mechanism for bidders to avoid the loss of bidding eligibility in the
event that exigent circumstances prevent them from bidding in a
particular round. The Auction 89 Comment Public Notice provides
additional, more detailed
[[Page 32776]]
information on how activity rule waivers operate.
30. The Bureau proposes that each bidder in Auction 89 be provided
with three activity rule waivers that may be used at the bidder's
discretion during the course of the auction. The Bureau seeks comment
on this proposal.
iv. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening Bids
31. A reserve price is an absolute minimum price below which an
item will not be sold. Reserve prices can be either published or
unpublished. A minimum opening bid, on the other hand, is the minimum
bid price set at the beginning of the auction below which no bids are
accepted. It is generally used to accelerate the competitive bidding
process. Also, the auctioneer may have the discretion to lower the
minimum opening bid amount later in the auction. It is also possible
for the minimum opening bid and the reserve price to be the same
amount.
32. The Bureau proposes to establish minimum opening bid amounts
for Auction 89. The Bureau believes a minimum opening bid amount, which
has been used in other auctions, is an effective bidding tool for
accelerating the competitive bidding process. The Bureau does not
propose a separate reserve price for the licenses to be offered in
Auction 89.
a. 218-219 MHz Licenses
33. For 218-219 MHz licenses offered in Auction 89, the Bureau
proposes to calculate minimum opening bid amounts on a license-by-
license basis using a formula based on bandwidth and license area
population: $.01 * MHz * license area population with a minimum of $500
per license.
34. The resulting minimum opening bid amount proposed for each 218-
219 MHz license available in Auction 89 is set forth in Attachment A of
the Auction 89 Comment Public Notice.
b. 220 MHz Licenses
35. For 220 MHz licenses offered in Auction 89, the Bureau proposes
to calculate minimum opening bid amounts on a license-by-license basis
as follows: EA Licenses $500 per license; and EAG Licenses $0.01 * MHz
* license area population.
36. The minimum opening bid amount proposed for each 220 MHz
license available in Auction 89 is set forth in Attachment A of the
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice.
37. The Bureau seeks comment on its proposals concerning minimum
opening bids. If commenters believe that these minimum opening bid
amounts will deter substantial numbers of bidders from placing bids on
licenses, or are not reasonable amounts, or should instead operate as a
reserve price, they should explain why this is so, and comment on the
desirability of an alternative approach. Commenters are advised to
support their claims with valuation analyses and suggested reserve
prices or minimum opening bid amount levels or formulas. In
establishing minimum opening bid amounts, the Bureau particularly seeks
comment on such factors as the amount of spectrum being auctioned,
levels of incumbency within these spectrum bands, the availability of
technology to provide service, the size of the service areas, issues of
interference with other spectrum bands and any other relevant factors
that could reasonably have an impact on valuation of the licenses being
auctioned. The Bureau seeks comment on this approach, and on whether,
consistent with Section 309(j), the public interest would be served by
having no minimum opening bid amount or reserve price.
v. Bid Amounts
38. The Bureau proposes that, in each round, eligible bidders be
able to place a bid on a given license using one or more pre-defined
bid amounts. Under this proposal, the FCC Auction System interface will
list the acceptable bid amounts for each license. The Bureau proposes
to calculate bid amounts.
a. Minimum Acceptable Bids
39. The first of the acceptable bid amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount for a license
will be equal to its minimum opening bid amount until there is a
provisionally winning bid on the license. After there is a
provisionally winning bid for a license, the minimum acceptable bid
amount for that license will be equal to the amount of the
provisionally winning bid plus a percentage of that bid amount
calculated using the formula. In general, the percentage will be higher
for a license receiving many bids than for a license receiving few
bids. In the case of a license for which the provisionally winning bid
has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the
second highest bid received for the license.
40. The percentage of the provisionally winning bid used to
establish the minimum acceptable bid amount (the additional percentage)
is calculated at the end of each round, based on an activity index. The
activity index is a weighted average of (a) the number of distinct
bidders placing a bid on the license, and (b) the activity index from
the prior round. Specifically, the activity index is equal to a
weighting factor times the number of bidders placing a bid covering the
license in the most recent bidding round plus one minus the weighting
factor times the activity index from the prior round. The additional
percentage is determined as one plus the activity index times a minimum
percentage amount, with the result not to exceed a given maximum. The
additional percentage is then multiplied by the provisionally winning
bid amount to obtain the minimum acceptable bid for the next round. The
Bureau proposes initially to set the weighting factor at 0.5, the
minimum percentage at 0.1 (10%), and the maximum percentage at 0.3
(30%). Hence, at these initial settings, the minimum acceptable bid for
a license will be between ten percent and thirty percent higher than
the provisionally winning bid, depending upon the bidding activity for
the license. Equations and examples are shown in Attachment B of the
Auction 89 Comment Public Notice.
b. Additional Bid Amounts
41. The Bureau proposes to allow no additional bid amounts per
license. Thus, the minimum acceptable bid would be the only bid amount
available in the FCC Auction System interface for each license. The
Bureau seeks comment on this proposal. The Bureau also seeks comment on
whether, in the alternative, to allow more bid amounts per license in a
given round, and if so, how many--up to a maximum of eight additional
bid amounts (for a total of nine bid amounts). In particular,
commenters should address the issue of additional bid amounts in light
of particular circumstances of Auction 89, including the nature of the
license inventory.
42. If the Bureau allows additional bid amounts, it proposes to
calculate any additional bid amounts using the minimum acceptable bid
amount and a bid increment percentage--more specifically, by
multiplying the minimum acceptable bid by one plus successively higher
multiples of the bid increment percentage. If, for example, the bid
increment percentage is five percent, the calculation of the first
additional acceptable bid amount is (minimum acceptable bid amount) *
(1 + 0.05), or (minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.05; the second
additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable bid
amount times one plus two times the bid increment percentage, or
(minimum acceptable bid amount) * 1.1, etc. If the Bureau allows
additional bid amounts, it proposes to
[[Page 32777]]
set the bid increment percentage at 0.05 (5%).
43. The Bureau retains the discretion to change the minimum
acceptable bid amounts, the number of acceptable bid amounts, the
additional bid amounts, and the parameters of the formulas used to
calculate minimum acceptable bid amounts and additional bid amounts if
the Bureau determines that circumstances so dictate. Further, the
Bureau retains the discretion to make such changes on a license-by-
license basis.
44. The Bureau also retains the discretion to limit (a) the amount
by which a minimum acceptable bid for a license may increase compared
with the corresponding provisionally winning bid, and (b) the amount by
which any additional bid amount may increase compared with the
immediately preceding acceptable bid amount. For example, the Bureau
could set a $1 million limit on increases in minimum acceptable bid
amounts over provisionally winning bids. Thus, if the activity-based
formula calculates a minimum acceptable bid amount that is $2 million
higher than the provisionally winning bid on a license, the minimum
acceptable bid amount would instead be capped at $1 million above the
provisionally winning bid. The Bureau seeks comment on the
circumstances under which the Bureau should employ such a limit,
factors it should consider when determining the dollar amount of the
limit, and the tradeoffs in setting such a limit or changing parameters
of the activity-based formula, such as changing the minimum percentage.
If the Bureau exercises this discretion, it will alert bidders by
announcement in the FCC Auction System.
45. The Bureau seeks comment on its proposals. Commenters may wish
to address the role of the minimum acceptable bids and the number of
acceptable bid amounts in managing the pace of the auction and the
tradeoffs in managing auction pace by changing the bidding schedule,
activity requirements, or bid amount parameters, or by using other
means.
vi. Provisionally Winning Bids
46. Provisionally winning bids are bids that would become final
winning bids if the auction were to close in that given round. At the
end of a bidding round, a provisionally winning bid for each license
will be determined based on the highest bid amount received for the
license. In the event of identical high bid amounts being submitted on
a license in a given round (i.e., tied bids), the Bureau will use a
random number generator to select a single provisionally winning bid
from among the tied bids. (Each bid is assigned a random number, and
the tied bid with the highest random number wins the tiebreaker.) The
remaining bidders, as well as the provisionally winning bidder, can
submit higher bids in subsequent rounds. However, if the auction were
to end with no other bids being placed, the winning bidder would be the
one that placed the provisionally winning bid. If any bids are received
on the license in a subsequent round, the provisionally winning bid
again will be determined by the highest bid amount received for the
license.
47. A provisionally winning bid will remain the provisionally
winning bid until there is a higher bid on the license at the close of
a subsequent round, unless the provisionally winning bid is withdrawn.
Bidders are reminded that provisionally winning bids count toward
activity for purposes of the activity rule.
vii. Bid Removal
48. For Auction 89, the Bureau proposes and seeks comment on the
following bid removal procedures. Before the close of a bidding round,
a bidder has the option of removing any bid placed in that round. By
removing selected bids in the FCC Auction System, a bidder may
effectively undo any of its bids placed within that round. In contrast
to the bid withdrawal provisions, a bidder removing a bid placed in the
same round is not subject to a withdrawal payment. Once a round closes,
a bidder may no longer remove a bid.
viii. Bid Withdrawal
49. A bidder may withdraw its provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw bids function in the FCC Auction System. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning bid(s) is subject to the bid
withdrawal payment provisions of the Commission rules.
50. For Auction 89, the Bureau proposes to limit each bidder to
withdrawing provisionally winning bids in only one round during the
course of the auction. To permit a bidder to withdraw bids in more than
one round may encourage insincere bidding or the use of withdrawals for
anti-competitive purposes. The round in which withdrawals may be used
will be at the bidder's discretion, and there is no limit on the number
of provisionally winning bids that may be withdrawn during that round.
Withdrawals must be in accordance with the Commission's rules, and are
subject to the bid withdrawal payment provisions specified in 47 CFR
1.2104(g). The Bureau seeks comment on these bid withdrawal procedures.
If commenters believe that each bidder should be allowed to withdraw
provisionally winning bids in more than one round during the course of
the auction, or should not be permitted to withdraw any bids, they
should state how many bid withdrawal rounds they seek and explain what
specific factors lead them to that conclusion.
D. Post-Auction Procedures
i. Establishing the Interim Withdrawal Payment Percentage
51. The Bureau seeks comment on the appropriate percentage of a
withdrawn bid that should be assessed as an interim withdrawal payment
in the event that a final withdrawal payment cannot be determined at
the close of the auction. In general, the Commission's rules provide
that a bidder that withdraws a bid during an auction is subject to a
withdrawal payment equal to the difference between the amount of the
withdrawn bid and the amount of the winning bid in the same or
subsequent auction(s). If a bid is withdrawn and no subsequent higher
bid is placed and/or the license is not won in the same auction, the
final withdrawal payment cannot be calculated until after the close of
a subsequent auction in which a higher bid for the license (or the
equivalent to the license) is placed or the license is won. When that
final payment cannot yet be calculated, the bidder that withdrew the
bid is assessed an interim bid withdrawal payment, which will be
applied toward any final bid withdrawal payment that is ultimately
assessed. Section 1.2104(g)(1) of the Commission rules requires that
the percentage of the withdrawn bid to be assessed as an interim bid
withdrawal payment be between three percent and twenty percent and that
it be set in advance of the auction.
52. The Commission has determined that the level of the interim
withdrawal payment in a particular auction will be based on the nature
of the service and the inventory of the licenses being offered. The
Commission has noted that it may impose a higher interim withdrawal
payment percentage to deter the anti-competitive use of withdrawals
when, for example, bidders likely will not need to aggregate the
licenses being offered in the auction, such as when few licenses are
offered that are on adjacent frequencies or in adjacent areas, or when
there are few synergies to be captured by combining licenses.
[[Page 32778]]
53. With respect to the licenses being offered in Auction 89, the
service rules permit a variety of fixed, mobile, and paging services,
though the opportunities for combining licenses on adjacent frequencies
or in adjacent areas are limited in some cases. Balancing the potential
need for bidders to use withdrawals to avoid winning incomplete
combinations of licenses with the Bureau's interest in deterring
undesirable strategic use of withdrawals, the Bureau proposes a
percentage below the maximum twenty percent permitted under the current
rules but above the three percent previously provided by the
Commission's rules. Specifically, the Bureau proposes to establish an
interim bid withdrawal payment of ten percent of the withdrawn bid for
this auction. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal. If commenters
advocate the use of a different percentage they should provide relevant
support including information on the likelihood that bidders will need
to aggregate licenses on adjacent frequencies or in adjacent areas.
ii. Establishing the Additional Default Payment Percentage
54. Any winning bidder that, after the close of an auction,
defaults--by, for example, failing to remit the required down payment
within the prescribed period of time, failing to submit a timely long-
form application, or failing to make full payment--or is otherwise
disqualified is liable for a default payment under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2).
This payment consists of a deficiency payment, equal to the difference
between the amount of the bidder's bid and the amount of the winning
bid the next time a license covering the same spectrum is won in an
auction, plus an additional payment equal to a percentage of the
defaulter's bid or of the subsequent winning bid, whichever is less.
55. Section 1.2104(g)(2) of the Commission's rules provides that in
advance of each auction without combinatorial or package bidding,
establish an additional default payment for that auction of three
percent up to a maximum of twenty percent. The level of this payment in
each case will be based on the nature of the service and the inventory
of the licenses being offered.
56. As previously noted by the Commission, defaults weaken the
integrity of the auction process and impede the deployment of service
to the public, and an additional default payment of more than three
percent will be more effective in deterring defaults. Given the history
of these services and the inventory of the licenses being offered in
Auction 89, the Bureau believes that an additional default payment
percentage of fifteen percent will provide a sufficient deterrent to
defaults. The Bureau seeks comment on this proposal.
IV. Ex Parte Rules
57. This proceeding has been designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. Persons
making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda
summarizing the presentations must contain summaries of the substance
of the presentations and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally required. Other rules pertaining to
oral and written ex parte presentations in permit-but-disclose
proceedings are set forth in 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. 2010-13880 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P