Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of the Port Detroit Zone, 32666-32668 [2010-13805]
Download as PDF
32666
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
2010 through 11:59 p.m. on June 13,
2010. It will be enforced between 12
p.m. and 4 p.m. on June 10, 2010,
between the hours of 2:30 p.m. and 9:30
p.m. on June 11, 2010, and again
between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
on June 12 and 13, 2010. The Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her on-scene representative may
terminate this operation at anytime.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, or his or her onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port, Sector Lake
Michigan, is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been designated by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, to act
on his or her behalf. The on-scene
representative of the Captain of the Port,
Sector Lake Michigan, will be aboard
either a Coast Guard or Coast Guard
Auxiliary vessel.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative to obtain permission to
do so. The Captain of the Port, Sector
Lake Michigan, or his or her on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the
safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port, Sector Lake Michigan, or his
or her on-scene representative.
Dated: May 25, 2010.
L. Barndt,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2010–13810 Filed 6–8–10; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2010–0126]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks
Events in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
rule 33 CFR 165.941, establishing safety
zones for annual fireworks events in the
Captain of the Port Detroit area of
responsibility. This rule adds safety
zones for fireworks events. These safety
zones are necessary to protect spectators
and vessels from the hazards associated
with fireworks displays.
DATES: This rule is effective June 9,
2010.
Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2010–0126 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG–
2010–0126 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box, and
then clicking ‘‘Search.’’ This material is
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden,
Prevention Department, Sector Detroit,
Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568–9508,
e-mail Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
On April 14, 2010, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks
Events in the Captain of the port Detroit
Zone in the Federal Register (75 FR
19304). We received zero comments on
the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this operation and
immediate action is necessary to
prevent possible loss of life or property
from the dangers that are associated
with fireworks displays.
Basis and Purpose
This rule adds additional events not
previously published in 33 CFR
165.941, Safety Zones; Annual
Fireworks Events in the Captain of the
Port Detroit Zone. These additional
safety zones are necessary to protect
vessels and spectators from the hazards
associated with fireworks displays.
Such hazards include obstructions to
the waterway that may cause marine
casualties, the explosive danger of
fireworks and debris falling into the
water that may cause death or serious
bodily harm.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received zero comments regarding
the proposed rule. There are no
substantive changes to the rule as
proposed by the NPRM published on
April 14, 2010.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zones and the zones
are in areas where the Coast Guard
expects insignificant adverse impact to
mariners from the zones’ activation.
The Coast Guard’s use of these safety
zones will be periodic, of short
duration, and designed to minimize the
impact on navigable waters. These
safety zones will only be enforced
immediately before, during, and after
the time the events occur. Furthermore,
these safety zones have been designed to
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
allow vessels to transit unrestricted to
portions of the waterways not affected
by the safety zones.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
the areas designated as safety zones in
subparagraphs (50) through (56) during
the dates and times the safety zones are
being enforced.
These safety zones will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule would
be in effect for short periods of time,
and only once per year, per zone. The
safety zones have been designed to
allow traffic to pass safely around the
zone whenever possible and vessels will
be allowed to pass through the zones
with the permission of the Captain of
the Port.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). We received zero comments
regarding the proposed rule.
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism. We received
zero comments regarding the proposed
rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble. We received
zero comments regarding the proposed
rule.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights. We received
zero comments regarding the proposed
rule.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden. We
received zero comments regarding the
proposed rule.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
We received zero comments regarding
the proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32667
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. We
received zero comments regarding the
proposed rule.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211. We
received zero comments regarding the
proposed rule.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards. We received zero comments
regarding the proposed rule.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
32668
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 9, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of safety
zones. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 165.941 by adding new
paragraphs (a)(50) through (a)(56) to
read as follows:
■
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 165.941 Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks
Events in the Captain of the Port Detroit
Zone.
(a) * * *
(50) Celebrate America Fireworks,
Grosse Pointe Farms, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of Lake St.
Clair within a 500-foot radius of the
fireworks launch site located at position
42°22′58″ N, 082°53′46″ W. (NAD 83).
This area is located southeast of the
Grosse Point Yacht Club.
(ii) Expected date: One evening
during the third week in June. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
(51) Target Fireworks, Detroit, MI:
(i) Location: The following three areas
are safety zones:
(A) The first safety zone area will
encompass all waters of the Detroit
River bounded by the arc of a circle
with a 900-foot radius with its center in
position 42°19′23″ N, 083°04′34″ W.
(B) The second safety zone area will
encompass a portion of the Detroit River
bounded on the South by the
International Boundary line, on the
West by 083°03′30″ W, on the North by
the City of Detroit shoreline and on the
East by 083°01′15″ W.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:39 Jun 08, 2010
Jkt 220001
(C) The third safety zone will
encompass a portion of the Detroit River
bounded on the South by the
International Boundary line, on the
West by the Ambassador Bridge, on the
North by the City of Detroit shoreline,
and on the East by the downstream end
of Belle Isle. The Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined that vessels
below 65 feet in length may enter this
zone.
(ii) Expected date: One evening
during the last week in June. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
(52) Sigma Gamma Association
Fireworks, Grosse Pointe Farms, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of Lake St.
Clair, within a 300-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site located at position
42°27′ N, 082°52′ W (NAD 83) This
position is located in the vicinity of
Ford’s Cove.
(ii) Expected date: One evening
during the last week in June. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
(53) Southside Summer Fireworks,
Port Huron, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of St. Clair
River within a 300 yard radius of
position 42°57′55″ N, 082°25′20″ W.
This position is located on the shore of
the St. Clair River in the vicinity of Oak
and 3rd Street, Port Huron, MI. All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: One evening
during the last week in June. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
(54) Bay City Fireworks Festival, Bay
City, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of the Saginaw
River near Bay City, MI, from the
Veteran’s Memorial Bridge, located at
position 43°35.8′ N; 083°53.6′ W, south
approximately 1000 yards to the River
Walk Pier, located at position 43°35.3′
N; 083°53.8′ W. All geographic
coordinates are North American Datum
of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: Three evenings
during the first week in July. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
(55) Toledo 4th of July Fireworks,
Toledo, OH:
(i) Location: All waters of the Maumee
River within a 300-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site located at position
41°38′35″ N, 083°31′54″ W. All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: One evening
during the first week in July. The exact
dates and times for this event will be
determined annually.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(56) Toledo Labor Day Fireworks,
Toledo, OH:
(i) Location: All waters of the Maumee
River within a 300-yard radius of the
fireworks launch site located at position
41°38′35″ N, 083°31′54″ W. All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected Date: One evening
during the first week in September. The
exact dates and times for this event will
be determined annually.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 24, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010–13805 Filed 6–8–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AN50
Copayments for Medications
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document affirms as
final an interim final rule that froze
through June 30, 2010, the copayment
required by Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) regulations for certain
outpatient medications. Under those
regulations, the copayment amount
must be increased based on the
prescription drug component of the
Medical Consumer Price Index (CPI–P),
and the maximum annual copayment
amount must be increased when the
copayment is increased.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
9, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roscoe Butler, Acting Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office, 810
Vermont Avenue, Washington, DC
20420, 202–461–1586. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under 38
U.S.C. 1722A(a), VA must require
veterans to pay a $2 copayment for each
30-day supply of medication furnished
on an outpatient basis for the treatment
of a nonservice-connected disability or
condition. Under 38 U.S.C. 1722A(b),
VA ‘‘may,’’ by regulation, increase that
copayment and establish a maximum
annual copayment (a ‘‘cap’’). We have
interpreted section 1722A(b) to mean
that VA has discretion to determine the
appropriate copayment amount and
annual cap amount for medication
E:\FR\FM\09JNR1.SGM
09JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 9, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32666-32668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13805]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2010-0126]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of the Port
Detroit Zone
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending rule 33 CFR 165.941, establishing
safety zones for annual fireworks events in the Captain of the Port
Detroit area of responsibility. This rule adds safety zones for
fireworks events. These safety zones are necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards associated with fireworks
displays.
DATES: This rule is effective June 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2010-0126 and are available online by going to
https://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0126 in the ``Keyword''
box, and then clicking ``Search.'' This material is also available for
inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden, Prevention Department, Sector
Detroit, Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568-9508, e-mail
Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 14, 2010, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of
the port Detroit Zone in the Federal Register (75 FR 19304). We
received zero comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested and none was held.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of ensuring the safety of spectators
and vessels during this operation and immediate action is necessary to
prevent possible loss of life or property from the dangers that are
associated with fireworks displays.
Basis and Purpose
This rule adds additional events not previously published in 33 CFR
165.941, Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of the
Port Detroit Zone. These additional safety zones are necessary to
protect vessels and spectators from the hazards associated with
fireworks displays. Such hazards include obstructions to the waterway
that may cause marine casualties, the explosive danger of fireworks and
debris falling into the water that may cause death or serious bodily
harm.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received zero comments regarding the proposed rule. There are no
substantive changes to the rule as proposed by the NPRM published on
April 14, 2010.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the minimal time that vessels will be restricted from the zones and
the zones are in areas where the Coast Guard expects insignificant
adverse impact to mariners from the zones' activation.
The Coast Guard's use of these safety zones will be periodic, of
short duration, and designed to minimize the impact on navigable
waters. These safety zones will only be enforced immediately before,
during, and after the time the events occur. Furthermore, these safety
zones have been designed to
[[Page 32667]]
allow vessels to transit unrestricted to portions of the waterways not
affected by the safety zones.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in the areas designated as safety zones in
subparagraphs (50) through (56) during the dates and times the safety
zones are being enforced.
These safety zones will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule would be in effect for short periods of time, and only once per
year, per zone. The safety zones have been designed to allow traffic to
pass safely around the zone whenever possible and vessels will be
allowed to pass through the zones with the permission of the Captain of
the Port.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). We received zero
comments regarding the proposed rule.
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism. We received zero comments regarding the proposed rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble. We received zero comments regarding the proposed rule.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. We received zero comments regarding the proposed rule.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. We received zero comments
regarding the proposed rule.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
We received zero comments regarding the proposed rule.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. We received zero
comments regarding the proposed rule.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211. We received zero comments regarding the
proposed rule.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. We received zero
comments regarding the proposed rule.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969
[[Page 32668]]
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This
rule involves the establishment of safety zones. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 165.941 by adding new paragraphs (a)(50) through (a)(56)
to read as follows:
Sec. 165.941 Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks Events in the Captain of
the Port Detroit Zone.
(a) * * *
(50) Celebrate America Fireworks, Grosse Pointe Farms, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of Lake St. Clair within a 500-foot radius
of the fireworks launch site located at position 42[deg]22'58'' N,
082[deg]53'46'' W. (NAD 83). This area is located southeast of the
Grosse Point Yacht Club.
(ii) Expected date: One evening during the third week in June. The
exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(51) Target Fireworks, Detroit, MI:
(i) Location: The following three areas are safety zones:
(A) The first safety zone area will encompass all waters of the
Detroit River bounded by the arc of a circle with a 900-foot radius
with its center in position 42[deg]19'23'' N, 083[deg]04'34'' W.
(B) The second safety zone area will encompass a portion of the
Detroit River bounded on the South by the International Boundary line,
on the West by 083[deg]03'30'' W, on the North by the City of Detroit
shoreline and on the East by 083[deg]01'15'' W.
(C) The third safety zone will encompass a portion of the Detroit
River bounded on the South by the International Boundary line, on the
West by the Ambassador Bridge, on the North by the City of Detroit
shoreline, and on the East by the downstream end of Belle Isle. The
Captain of the Port Detroit has determined that vessels below 65 feet
in length may enter this zone.
(ii) Expected date: One evening during the last week in June. The
exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(52) Sigma Gamma Association Fireworks, Grosse Pointe Farms, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of Lake St. Clair, within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks launch site located at position 42[deg]27' N,
082[deg]52' W (NAD 83) This position is located in the vicinity of
Ford's Cove.
(ii) Expected date: One evening during the last week in June. The
exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(53) Southside Summer Fireworks, Port Huron, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of St. Clair River within a 300 yard
radius of position 42[deg]57'55'' N, 082[deg]25'20'' W. This position
is located on the shore of the St. Clair River in the vicinity of Oak
and 3rd Street, Port Huron, MI. All geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: One evening during the last week in June. The
exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(54) Bay City Fireworks Festival, Bay City, MI:
(i) Location: All waters of the Saginaw River near Bay City, MI,
from the Veteran's Memorial Bridge, located at position 43[deg]35.8' N;
083[deg]53.6' W, south approximately 1000 yards to the River Walk Pier,
located at position 43[deg]35.3' N; 083[deg]53.8' W. All geographic
coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: Three evenings during the first week in July.
The exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(55) Toledo 4th of July Fireworks, Toledo, OH:
(i) Location: All waters of the Maumee River within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks launch site located at position 41[deg]38'35''
N, 083[deg]31'54'' W. All geographic coordinates are North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected date: One evening during the first week in July. The
exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
(56) Toledo Labor Day Fireworks, Toledo, OH:
(i) Location: All waters of the Maumee River within a 300-yard
radius of the fireworks launch site located at position 41[deg]38'35''
N, 083[deg]31'54'' W. All geographic coordinates are North American
Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(ii) Expected Date: One evening during the first week in September.
The exact dates and times for this event will be determined annually.
* * * * *
Dated: May 24, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010-13805 Filed 6-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P