Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, 32353-32354 [2010-13682]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Section 117.619 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 117.619
Taunton River.
(a) The Brightman Street (Route-6)
Bridge at mile 1.8, between Fall River
and Somerset, shall operate as follows:
(b) The draw shall open on signal
between 5 a.m. and 9 p.m., daily. From
9 p.m. through 5 a.m. the draw shall
open on signal after at least a one-hour
advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32353
(c) From June 1 through August 31,
the draw need not open for the passage
of pleasure craft from 7 a.m. to 9:30 a.m.
and from 4 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. The
draw shall open for commercial vessels
at all times.
(d) From 6 p.m. on December 24 to
midnight on December 25, and from 6
p.m. on December 31 to midnight on
January 1, the draw shall open on signal
if at least a two-hour advance notice is
given by calling the number posted at
the bridge.
The owner of the bridge shall provide
and keep in good legible condition
clearance gauges located on both
upstream and downstream sides of the
draw with figures not less than twelve
inches in height, designed, installed and
maintained according to the provisions
of section 118.160 of this chapter.
Dated: May 25, 2010.
Joseph A. Servidio,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2010–13643 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0276; FRL–9139–8]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, South Coast Air
Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
revisions to the South Coast Air Quality
Management District portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern standards
for continuous emission monitoring
systems. We are proposing to approve
local rules to regulate the monitoring of
emissions under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal
must arrive by July 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2010–0276, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
32354
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Proposed Rules
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the public
comment. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
This
proposal addresses the following local
rules:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
218
218.1
In the Rules and Regulations section
of this Federal Register, we are
approving these local rules in a direct
final action without prior proposal
because we believe these SIP revisions
are not controversial. If we receive
adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based
on this proposed rule. Please note that
emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with PROPOSALS
SCAQMD ..............................................
SCAQMD ..............................................
if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second
comment period, so anyone interested
in commenting should do so at this
time. If we do not receive adverse
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Adopted/
amended
Rule title
Continuous Emission Monitoring ........................................
Continuous Emission Monitoring Performance Specifications.
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
Submitted
05/14/99
05/14/99
07/23/99
07/23/99
comments, no further activity is
planned. For further information, please
see the direct final action.
Dated: April 1, 2010.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2010–13682 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\08JNP1.SGM
08JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32353-32354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13682]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0276; FRL-9139-8]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the South Coast Air
Quality Management District portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern standards for
continuous emission monitoring systems. We are proposing to approve
local rules to regulate the monitoring of emissions under the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 8, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2010-0276, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
[[Page 32354]]
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. https://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules:
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD.................................... 218 Continuous Emission 05/14/99 07/23/99
Monitoring.
SCAQMD.................................... 218.1 Continuous Emission 05/14/99 07/23/99
Monitoring Performance
Specifications.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we
are approving these local rules in a direct final action without prior
proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not controversial.
If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments in
subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.
Dated: April 1, 2010.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2010-13682 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P