Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes, 32263-32266 [2010-13425]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective July 13, 2010.
inspections and disposition the parts, as
specified in paragraphs 3.A.(3) and 3.A.(5) or
paragraphs 3.B.(3) and 3.B.(5) respectively, of
the Accomplishment Instructions of CFM
International SB No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B
72–1067, dated February 15, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to CFM International,
S.A. models CFM56–3 and –3B turbofan
engines with 25 degrees midspan shroud fan
blades, part numbers (P/Ns) 9527M99P08,
9527M99P09, 9527M99P10, 9527M99P11,
1285M39P01, or fan blade pairs, P/Ns 335–
088–901–0, 335–088–902–0, 335–088–903–0,
and 335–088–904–0 installed. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Boeing
737 series airplanes.
(d) CFM International, S.A. has added to
the basic engine model number on the engine
nameplate to identify minor variations in
engine configuration, installation
components, or reduced ratings peculiar to
aircraft installation requirements.
(e) Those engines marked on the engine
data plate as CFM56–3–B1 are included in
this AD as CFM56–3 turbofan engines.
(f) Those engines marked on the engine
data plate as CFM56–3B–2 are included in
this AD as CFM56–3B turbofan engines.
Unsafe Condition
(g) This AD results from a report of a failed
fan blade with severe out-of-limit wear on the
underside of the blade platform where it
contacts the damper. We are issuing this AD
to prevent failure of multiple fan blades,
which could result in an uncontained failure
of the engine and damage to the airplane.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Compliance
(h) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Inspection for Wear
(i) Within 900 cycles-in-service after the
effective date of this AD, perform an on-wing
or in-shop inspection of the fan blade and
damper for wear. Use paragraphs 3.A.(1)
through 3.A.(5) or paragraphs 3.B.(1) through
3.B.(5) respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International Service
Bulletin (SB) No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–
1067, dated February 15, 2007.
(j) If you find out-of-limit wear on at least
one fan blade platform underside, perform
the additional inspections and disposition
the parts, as specified in paragraphs 3.A.(3)
and 3.A.(5) or paragraphs 3.B.(3) and 3.B.(5)
respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International SB No.
CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–1067, dated
February 15, 2007.
(k) Thereafter, within intervals not to
exceed 3,000 cycles-since-last inspection,
perform an on-wing or in-shop inspection for
wear. Use paragraphs 3.A.(1) through 3.A.(5)
or paragraphs 3.B.(1) through 3.B.(5)
respectively, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of CFM International SB No.
CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–1067, dated
February 15, 2007.
(l) If you find wear on at least one fan blade
platform underside, perform additional
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
32263
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Installation Prohibition
(m) After the effective date of this AD,
don’t install any 25 degrees midspan shroud
fan blades, P/Ns 9527M99P08, 9527M99P09,
9527M99P10, 9527M99P11, 1285M39P01, or
fan blade pairs, P/Ns 335–088–901–0, 335–
088–902–0, 335–088–903–0, and 335–088–
904–0, unless they have passed an inspection
specified in paragraph 3. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of CFM
International SB No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B
72–1067, dated February 15, 2007.
[Docket No. FAA–2009–1223; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–114–AD; Amendment
39–16327; AD 2010–12–06]
Optional Terminating Action
(n) Replacing the 25 degrees midspan
shroud fan blade set with a 37 degrees
midspan shroud fan blade set terminates the
repetitive inspection requirements specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Model DHC–8–400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(o) The Manager, Engine Certification
Office, has the authority to approve
alternative methods of compliance for this
AD if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Related Information
(p) Contact Antonio Cancelliere, Aerospace
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: antonio.cancelliere@faa.gov;
telephone (781) 238–7751; fax (781) 238–
7199, for more information about this AD.
(q) European Aviation Safety Agency AD
2009–0036, dated February 20, 2009, also
addresses the subject of this AD.
During final Acceptance Test Procedure
(ATP), a small oil leak was discovered on the
Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff
Valve bodies. Investigation revealed that a
number of valves were manufactured with an
incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent
external weeping and pressure loss from the
subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause
a loss of hydraulic fluid and subsequent loss
of spoiler and/or rudder control.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(r) You must use CFM International Service
Bulletin No. CFM56–3/3B/3C S/B 72–1067,
dated February 15, 2007, to perform the
inspections and parts dispositions required
by this AD. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by
reference of this service bulletin in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. Contact CFM International, S. A.,
Technical Publication Department, 1
Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215;
telephone (513) 552–2800; fax (513) 552–
2816, for a copy of this service information.
You may review copies at the FAA, New
England Region, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
May 25, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–13432 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
13, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 13, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems
Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York
Aircraft Certification Office, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone (516) 228–
7318; fax (516) 794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
32264
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on December 30, 2009 (74 FR
69038). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During final Acceptance Test Procedure
(ATP), a small oil leak was discovered on the
Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff
Valve bodies. Investigation revealed that a
number of valves were manufactured with an
incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent
external weeping and pressure loss from the
subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause
a loss of hydraulic fluid and subsequent loss
of spoiler and/or rudder control.
Revision 1 of this directive mandates a new
interval for the initial inspection, clarifies the
time for replacement of the valve(s) specified
in Paragraphs 1.2 and 2.2, and clarifies the
labeling of the inspected valves in Paragraph
3 of this directive.
Required actions include doing detailed
inspections of the left-hand and righthand spoiler unload and rudder shutoff
valve for leaking and weeping, replacing
discrepant left-hand and right-hand
spoiler unload and rudder shutoff
valves with new or serviceable valves,
and eventually replacing all valves
having a certain part number.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Request To Address Valves Inspected
Previously
Horizon Air requests that we address
valves that have been inspected
previously by the manufacturer by
revising paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of
the NPRM to include the phrase
‘‘without suffix ‘A’ after the serial
number.’’ Horizon Air explains that the
NPRM, as written, requires the
inspection to be done on all valves,
regardless if they have been modified or
unmodified. Horizon Air suggests that
with the recommended phrasing, the
NPRM would continue to require
inspection of valves with the identified
unsafe condition, but would not require
inspection of valves inspected
previously.
We agree. Adding the phrase ‘‘without
suffix ‘A’ after the serial number’’ will
eliminate unnecessary inspections for
valves that have been inspected
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
previously by the manufacturer. We
have revised paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2)
of this AD accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
with the changes described previously.
We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on
any operator or increase the scope of the
AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of
Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have
increased the labor rate used in the
Costs of Compliance from $80 per workhour to $85 per work-hour. The Costs of
Compliance information, below, reflects
this increase in the specified hourly
labor rate.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
61 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 3 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Required parts will cost about $0 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these parts. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of this AD
to the U.S. operators to be $15,555, or
$255 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains the NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
■
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
2010–12–06 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment
39–16327. Docket No. FAA–2009–1223;
Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–114–AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD)
becomes effective July 13, 2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
Model DHC–8–400, DHC–8–401, and DHC–
8–402 series airplanes, certificated in any
category, serial numbers 4105 through 4179
inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 27: Flight controls.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
During final Acceptance Test Procedure
(ATP), a small oil leak was discovered on the
Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff
Valve bodies. Investigation revealed that a
number of valves were manufactured with an
incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent
external weeping and pressure loss from the
subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause
a loss of hydraulic fluid and subsequent loss
of spoiler and/or rudder control.
Revision 1 of this directive mandates a new
interval for the initial inspection, clarifies the
time for replacement of the valve(s) specified
in Paragraphs 1.2 and 2.2, and clarifies the
labeling of the inspected valves in Paragraph
3 of this directive.
Required actions include doing detailed
inspections of the left-hand and right-hand
spoiler unload and rudder shutoff valve for
leaking and weeping, replacing discrepant
left-hand and right-hand spoiler unload and
rudder shutoff valves with new or serviceable
valves, and eventually replacing all valves
having a certain part number.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the
actions required by this AD performed within
the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Do the actions specified in paragraphs
(g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD, as
applicable.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:47 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
(1) For airplanes having serial numbers
4105 through 4172 inclusive: Within 750
flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
do a detailed inspection of the left-hand and
right-hand spoiler unload valves having part
number (P/N) 396000–1005 without suffix
‘‘A’’ after the serial number, for leaking and
weeping, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–27–37, dated February 5,
2009. For airplanes with left-hand and righthand spoiler unload valves having P/N
396000–1005 with suffix ‘‘A’’ after the serial
number, no further action is required by this
paragraph.
(i) If any leaking or weeping is found, prior
to further flight, replace the affected spoiler
unload valve with a new or serviceable valve,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–27–37, dated February 5, 2009.
(ii) If no leaking and no weeping are found,
replace the valves with new or serviceable
valves within 6,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(1)
of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–27–37, dated February 5,
2009.
(2) For airplanes having serial numbers
4113 through 4179 inclusive: Within 750
flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
do a detailed inspection of the left-hand and
right-hand rudder shutoff valves having P/N
412700–1001 without suffix ‘‘A’’ after the
serial number, for leaking and weeping, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–27–39, dated February 5, 2009. For
airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
rudder shutoff valves having P/N 412700–
1001 with suffix ‘‘A’’ after the serial number,
no further action is required by this
paragraph.
(i) If any leaking or weeping is found, prior
to further flight, replace the affected rudder
shutoff valve with a new or serviceable valve,
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84–27–39, dated February 5, 2009.
(ii) If no leaking and no weeping are found,
replace the valves with new or serviceable
valves within 6,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–27–39, dated February 5,
2009.
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install a spoiler unload valve
assembly having P/N 396000–1005, having a
serial number from 0289 through 0424
inclusive, or rudder shutoff valve having P/
N 412700–1001, having a serial number from
0239 through 0384 inclusive, on any
airplane, unless the valve has been inspected
by the manufacturer and labeled with a suffix
‘‘A’’ after the serial number.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32265
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn:
Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York,
11590; telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–
794–5531. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies,
notify your principal maintenance inspector
(PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal
inspector, your local Flight Standards District
Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness
Directive CF–2009–25R1, dated July 23,
2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–37,
dated February 5, 2009; and Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–27–39, dated February 5,
2009; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–27–37, dated February 5, 2009;
or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–27–39,
dated February 5, 2009; as applicable; to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the
AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
this service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; e-mail
thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the
service information that is incorporated by
reference at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go
to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
32266
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 8, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 25,
2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–13425 Filed 6–7–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0171; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–185–AD; Amendment
39–16329; AD 2010–12–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model
A300 Series Airplanes; Airbus Model
A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–600R
Series Airplanes, and Model C4–605R
Variant F Airplanes (Collectively Called
A300–600 Series Airplanes); and Model
A310 Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
During a maintenance check performed by
an A310 operator, the recommended
modification of the lower attachment beam of
rack 101VU by accomplishment of Airbus
Service Bulletin (SB) A310–53–2076 was
embodied on the aeroplane, leading the
operator to find three cracks on the FR15A
crossbeam above the NLG [nose landing gear]
box at the splicing with rack 107VU fitting.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could degrade the structural
integrity of the crossbeam on NLG FR15A
Web attachment fitting of rack 107VU. Rack
107VU contains major airworthiness system
components whose functioning could be
adversely affected by the loss of the
attachment fitting.
As the A300 and A300–600 aeroplanes
share this design feature, they are also
affected.
*
*
*
*
*
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July
13, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
18:47 Jun 07, 2010
Jkt 220001
Explanation of Change Made to This
AD
You may examine the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov or in person at the
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M–30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC.
We have revised the subject header of
this AD to identify the affected airplane
models as published in the most recent
type certificate data sheet.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149.
14 CFR Part 39
VerDate Mar<15>2010
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of July 13, 2010.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would
apply to the specified products. That
NPRM was published in the Federal
Register on February 25, 2010 (75 FR
8549). That NPRM proposed to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
During a maintenance check performed by
an A310 operator, the recommended
modification of the lower attachment beam of
rack 101VU by accomplishment of Airbus
Service Bulletin (SB) A310–53–2076 was
embodied on the aeroplane, leading the
operator to find three cracks on the FR15A
crossbeam above the NLG [nose landing gear]
box at the splicing with rack 107VU fitting.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could degrade the structural
integrity of the crossbeam on NLG FR15A
Web attachment fitting of rack 107VU. Rack
107VU contains major airworthiness system
components whose functioning could be
adversely affected by the loss of the
attachment fitting.
As the A300 and A300–600 aeroplanes
share this design feature, they are also
affected.
For the reasons stated above, this AD
requires repetitive inspections for cracks of
the crossbeam on NLG FR15A Web face
attachment fitting of rack 107VU and
corrective action, depending on findings.
The corrective actions include
contacting Airbus for repair
instructions, and doing the repair if any
crack is found. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comment received. The
commenter, FedEx Express, supports
the NPRM.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD
as proposed.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have required different
actions in this AD from those in the
MCAI in order to follow our FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
206 products of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it will take about 2 workhours per product to comply with the
basic requirements of this AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to
be $35,020, or $170 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 8, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32263-32266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13425]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-1223; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-114-AD;
Amendment 39-16327; AD 2010-12-06]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
During final Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP), a small oil leak
was discovered on the Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff Valve
bodies. Investigation revealed that a number of valves were
manufactured with an incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent external weeping and pressure
loss from the subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause a loss of hydraulic
fluid and subsequent loss of spoiler and/or rudder control.
* * * * *
We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective July 13, 2010.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of July 13,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone (516) 228-7318; fax (516) 794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 32264]]
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on December 30, 2009
(74 FR 69038). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:
During final Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP), a small oil leak
was discovered on the Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff Valve
bodies. Investigation revealed that a number of valves were
manufactured with an incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent external weeping and pressure
loss from the subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause a loss of hydraulic
fluid and subsequent loss of spoiler and/or rudder control.
Revision 1 of this directive mandates a new interval for the
initial inspection, clarifies the time for replacement of the
valve(s) specified in Paragraphs 1.2 and 2.2, and clarifies the
labeling of the inspected valves in Paragraph 3 of this directive.
Required actions include doing detailed inspections of the left-hand
and right-hand spoiler unload and rudder shutoff valve for leaking and
weeping, replacing discrepant left-hand and right-hand spoiler unload
and rudder shutoff valves with new or serviceable valves, and
eventually replacing all valves having a certain part number.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.
Request To Address Valves Inspected Previously
Horizon Air requests that we address valves that have been
inspected previously by the manufacturer by revising paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of the NPRM to include the phrase ``without suffix `A' after
the serial number.'' Horizon Air explains that the NPRM, as written,
requires the inspection to be done on all valves, regardless if they
have been modified or unmodified. Horizon Air suggests that with the
recommended phrasing, the NPRM would continue to require inspection of
valves with the identified unsafe condition, but would not require
inspection of valves inspected previously.
We agree. Adding the phrase ``without suffix `A' after the serial
number'' will eliminate unnecessary inspections for valves that have
been inspected previously by the manufacturer. We have revised
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.
Explanation of Change to Costs of Compliance
Since issuance of the NPRM, we have increased the labor rate used
in the Costs of Compliance from $80 per work-hour to $85 per work-hour.
The Costs of Compliance information, below, reflects this increase in
the specified hourly labor rate.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 61 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $0 per product.
Where the service information lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge
for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators
to be $15,555, or $255 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
[[Page 32265]]
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
2010-12-06 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16327. Docket No. FAA-
2009-1223; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-114-AD.
Effective Date
(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective July 13,
2010.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, DHC-8-
401, and DHC-8-402 series airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 4105 through 4179 inclusive.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
During final Acceptance Test Procedure (ATP), a small oil leak
was discovered on the Spoiler Unload Valve and Rudder Shutoff Valve
bodies. Investigation revealed that a number of valves were
manufactured with an incorrect wall thickness. This thin wall
condition caused cracking, subsequent external weeping and pressure
loss from the subject valves.
This condition, if not corrected, will cause a loss of hydraulic
fluid and subsequent loss of spoiler and/or rudder control.
Revision 1 of this directive mandates a new interval for the
initial inspection, clarifies the time for replacement of the
valve(s) specified in Paragraphs 1.2 and 2.2, and clarifies the
labeling of the inspected valves in Paragraph 3 of this directive.
Required actions include doing detailed inspections of the left-hand
and right-hand spoiler unload and rudder shutoff valve for leaking
and weeping, replacing discrepant left-hand and right-hand spoiler
unload and rudder shutoff valves with new or serviceable valves, and
eventually replacing all valves having a certain part number.
Compliance
(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.
Actions
(g) Do the actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and
(g)(3) of this AD, as applicable.
(1) For airplanes having serial numbers 4105 through 4172
inclusive: Within 750 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, do a detailed inspection of the left-hand and right-hand spoiler
unload valves having part number (P/N) 396000-1005 without suffix
``A'' after the serial number, for leaking and weeping, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-27-37, dated February 5, 2009. For airplanes
with left-hand and right-hand spoiler unload valves having P/N
396000-1005 with suffix ``A'' after the serial number, no further
action is required by this paragraph.
(i) If any leaking or weeping is found, prior to further flight,
replace the affected spoiler unload valve with a new or serviceable
valve, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-37, dated February 5, 2009.
(ii) If no leaking and no weeping are found, replace the valves
with new or serviceable valves within 6,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-27-37, dated February 5, 2009.
(2) For airplanes having serial numbers 4113 through 4179
inclusive: Within 750 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, do a detailed inspection of the left-hand and right-hand rudder
shutoff valves having P/N 412700-1001 without suffix ``A'' after the
serial number, for leaking and weeping, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-39,
dated February 5, 2009. For airplanes with left-hand and right-hand
rudder shutoff valves having P/N 412700-1001 with suffix ``A'' after
the serial number, no further action is required by this paragraph.
(i) If any leaking or weeping is found, prior to further flight,
replace the affected rudder shutoff valve with a new or serviceable
valve, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-39, dated February 5, 2009.
(ii) If no leaking and no weeping are found, replace the valves
with new or serviceable valves within 6,000 flight hours after the
initial inspection required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-27-39, dated February 5, 2009.
(3) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
spoiler unload valve assembly having P/N 396000-1005, having a
serial number from 0289 through 0424 inclusive, or rudder shutoff
valve having P/N 412700-1001, having a serial number from 0239
through 0384 inclusive, on any airplane, unless the valve has been
inspected by the manufacturer and labeled with a suffix ``A'' after
the serial number.
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service
information as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(h) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York, 11590; telephone 516-
228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(i) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2009-25R1,
dated July 23, 2009; Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-37, dated
February 5, 2009; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-39, dated
February 5, 2009; for related information.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(j) You must use Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-37, dated
February 5, 2009; or Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-39, dated
February 5, 2009; as applicable; to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; e-mail thd.qseries@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com.
(3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
[[Page 32266]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 25, 2010.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-13425 Filed 6-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P