Rules of Practice, 32242-32243 [2010-13591]
Download as PDF
32242
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 108 / Monday, June 7, 2010 / Notices
• NCDOT District 1 Office, 4009
District Drive, Raleigh, NC.
The project Web site https://
www.sehsr.org includes a complete list
of locations and addresses. The
document is also available at the
Virginia Department of Rail and Public
Transportation Office at 600 East Main
Street, Suite 2102, Richmond, VA; and
the North Carolina Department of
Transportation Rail Division at 1 South
Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC. In
addition, electronic versions of the Draft
Tier II EIS and appendices are available
through FRA’s Web site at
www.fra.dot.gov, on the DRPT Web site
at https://www.drpt.virginia.gov and on
the project Web site at www.sehsr.org.
Issued in Washington, DC, on June 2, 2010.
Mark E. Yachmetz,
Associate Administrator for Policy and
Development.
[FR Doc. 2010–13587 Filed 6–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA–2010–0149]
Rules of Practice
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of informal
hearing procedure; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: The FMCSA announces that it
is re-evaluating the appropriateness and
effectiveness of the informal hearing
procedure authorized under the
Agency’s Rules of Practice. Although
proceedings where an informal hearing
has already been requested will
continue to be processed under the
Rules of Practice, the Agency will not
entertain any new requests for informal
hearings pending its re-evaluation of the
procedure.
DATES: Effective June 7, 2010.
Comments must be received by August
6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the Federal Docket
Management System Docket Number,
FMCSA–2010–0149, by any of the
following methods. Do not submit the
same comments by more than one
method. However, to allow effective
public participation before the comment
period deadline, the Agency encourages
use of the Web site, which is listed first.
It will provide the most efficient and
timely method of receiving and
processing your comments.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:27 Jun 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Unit;
U.S. Department of Transportation,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Ground floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the Agency name and docket
number for this regulatory action. Note
that all comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. The
Department of Transportation’s (DOT)
complete Privacy Act Statement was
published in the Federal Register on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), and can
be viewed at https://docketsinfo.dot.gov.
Public Participation: The
regulations.gov system is generally
available 24 hours each day, 365 days
each year. You can find electronic
submission and retrieval help and
guidelines under the ‘‘help’’ section of
the Web site. For notification that
FMCSA received the comments, please
include a self-addressed, stamped
envelope or postcard, or print the
acknowledgement page that appears
after submitting comments on line.
Copies or abstracts of all documents
referenced in this notice are in the
docket: FMCSA–2010–0149. For access
to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov at any time
or to Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. All
comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date
indicated above will be considered and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above address. Comments
received after the closing date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
FMCSA may, however, issue a final
determination at any time after the close
of the comment period. In addition to
late comments, FMCSA will also
continue to file in the public docket
relevant information that becomes
available after the comment closing
date. Interested persons should monitor
the public docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Falk, Office of Chief Counsel,
Adjudications Counsel (MC–CCA),
FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC 20590. Tel. (202) 366–
9304.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 113(f), Congress
directed FMCSA to carry out the duties
and powers related to motor carriers or
motor carrier safety vested in the
Secretary of Transportation by chapters
5, 51, 55, 57, 59, 133 through 149, 311,
313, 315 and 317 of title 49 of the U.S.
Code, except as otherwise delegated by
the Secretary. Regulations implementing
this statutory authority include the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs) (49 CFR parts
380–399), the Federal Motor Carrier
Commercial Regulations (FMCCRs) (49
CFR parts 360–379), and the Federal
Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMRs) (49 CFR parts 171–180).
FMCSA’s enforcement powers
include the general authority to conduct
administrative enforcement proceedings
for violations of the FMCCRs (49 U.S.C.
14701) as well as to assess civil
penalties for violations related to
commercial motor vehicle safety (49
U.S.C. chapter 5) and hazardous
materials (49 U.S.C. chapter 51).
In accordance with this authority, the
Agency promulgated regulations
governing civil penalty and driver
disqualification proceedings before the
Agency. These regulations are known as
the Rules of Practice for Motor Carrier,
Intermodal Equipment Provider, Broker,
Freight Forwarder, and Hazardous
Materials Proceedings (Rules of
Practice) and are codified at 49 CFR part
386.
In May 2005, the Agency amended the
Rules of Practice to establish, among
other things, an informal hearing
process as an option for adjudicating
administrative enforcement proceedings
(see 70 FR 28467, May 18, 2005). Civil
penalty proceedings are initiated by
issuance of a Notice of Claim by a
representative of the Agency (Claimant)
pursuant to 49 CFR 386.11(c). Under 49
CFR 386.14(b)(2), the party against
whom a claim is made (Respondent)
must reply to the Notice of Claim by
electing one of three options: (1) Paying
the full amount of the claim; (2)
contesting the claim by requesting
administrative adjudication pursuant to
section 386.14(d); or (3) seeking binding
arbitration in accordance with the
Agency’s arbitration program. Under
section 386.14(d)(1)(iii), a respondent
electing administrative adjudication
may request that the matter be
adjudicated either through: (A)
Submission of written evidence without
hearing; (B) an informal hearing; or (C)
a formal hearing.
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 108 / Monday, June 7, 2010 / Notices
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
The informal hearing process was
intended to provide expedited
consideration of a civil penalty case by
a neutral third party without the
formalities attendant to a hearing before
an Administrative Law Judge (see 69 FR
61620, Oct. 20, 2004). Section 386.2
defines an informal hearing as ‘‘a
hearing in which the parties have the
opportunity to present relevant
evidence to a neutral Hearing Officer,
who will prepare findings of fact and
recommendations for the Agency
decisionmaker. The informal hearing
will not be on the transcribed record
and discovery will not be allowed.
Parties will have the opportunity to
discuss their case and present testimony
and evidence before the Hearing Officer
without the formality of a formal
hearing.’’ After receiving the hearing
officer’s report and recommendations,
the Assistant Administrator has the
discretion to either adopt the report or
issue other orders as he or she deems
appropriate. [See sections
386.16(b)(4)(i)(A) and 386.61(b)].
FMCSA implemented informal
hearings on a graduated basis in order
to evaluate the efficacy of this new
process. In the first phase of
implementation, FMCSA considered
requests for informal hearings only from
respondents in the Midwestern Service
Center’s geographical area (see 71 FR
13894, Mar. 17, 2006). In the second
phase, FMCSA expanded eligibility to
respondents in the Eastern Service
Center’s geographical area (see 72 FR
6806, Feb. 13, 2007). To date, only
respondents located in States within the
Agency’s Eastern and Midwestern
Service Centers have been eligible to
request informal hearings.
Having evaluated the implementation
of the informal hearing procedure,
FMCSA has concerns about the
appropriateness of the personnel the
Agency assigned to serve as hearing
officers. Section 386.2 defines ‘‘hearing
officer’’ as ‘‘a neutral Agency employee
designated by the Assistant
Administrator to preside over an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:27 Jun 04, 2010
Jkt 220001
informal hearing.’’ The Agency selected
two FMCSA employees—one located in
the Southern Service Center and one
located in the Western Service Center—
to serve as hearing officers. However,
the Agency did not receive enough
informal hearing requests to dedicate
these employees as full-time hearing
officers. As a result, these employees
continued to carry out their existing
responsibilities related to the
implementation of the enforcement
programs in their respective Service
Center areas. Although, as noted above,
informal hearings are not available to
respondents located in the Southern and
Western Service Centers, there is
legitimate concern that FMCSA
personnel involved in the Agency’s
enforcement program may not be
considered sufficiently neutral.
Suspension of Current Informal
Hearing Procedure
After careful consideration, and as a
result of the issues discussed above,
FMCSA has decided to suspend the use
of informal hearings for enforcement
actions initiated after publication of this
notice pending re-evaluation of the
informal hearing procedure. This reevaluation will include consideration of
possible regulatory changes as well as
implementation strategies.
Five cases assigned to hearing officers
are still awaiting informal hearings.
There are 15 additional cases in which
claimants have consented to
respondents’ informal hearing requests,
but have not been assigned to a hearing
officer. Furthermore, in 13 additional
cases, claimants in the Eastern and
Midwestern Service Centers have
objected to requests for informal
hearings. The Agency has not yet ruled
on these objections because of its
concerns regarding the informal hearing
procedure. In order to avoid further
delaying the resolution of the 20
pending cases awaiting informal
hearings or assignment of a hearing
officer, the Agency will assign these
cases to one or more hearing officers not
connected with the Agency’s
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
32243
enforcement program, who will be
responsible for initiating and
concluding the informal hearing
process. The Agency will also make it
a priority to consider the pending
objections to informal hearings and may
thus assign additional cases to the
hearing officer(s), as appropriate.
Notices of Claim issued after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register will advise respondents
seeking to contest a claim through
administrative adjudication that they
may either submit written evidence
without a formal hearing or request a
formal hearing.
FMCSA has determined that no
Respondent has suffered substantive
harm or prejudice as a result of
disposition under the informal hearing
option. Of the 11 cases assigned to
hearing officers, only three were finally
resolved under the informal hearing
procedure. In these cases, the hearing
officer issued a final report
recommending that the Assistant
Administrator approve settlement
agreements entered into by the parties.
The Assistant Administrator accepted
the recommendations, resulting in final
disposition of these cases. With respect
to the other eight cases, six are awaiting
informal hearings following assignment
of a hearing officer, one was settled
before a specific hearing officer was
assigned, and the final case is awaiting
further action following issuance of the
hearing officer’s report.
Finally, FMCSA believes that, if
implemented more effectively, reestablishment of an informal hearing
process would be beneficial to both the
Agency and to respondents seeking
more informal resolution of enforcement
matters. FMCSA seeks public comment
on options for implementing an
effective informal hearing process.
Issued on: May 28, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–13591 Filed 6–4–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 108 (Monday, June 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32242-32243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
[FMCSA Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0149]
Rules of Practice
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of suspension of informal hearing procedure; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FMCSA announces that it is re-evaluating the
appropriateness and effectiveness of the informal hearing procedure
authorized under the Agency's Rules of Practice. Although proceedings
where an informal hearing has already been requested will continue to
be processed under the Rules of Practice, the Agency will not entertain
any new requests for informal hearings pending its re-evaluation of the
procedure.
DATES: Effective June 7, 2010. Comments must be received by August 6,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the Federal Docket
Management System Docket Number, FMCSA-2010-0149, by any of the
following methods. Do not submit the same comments by more than one
method. However, to allow effective public participation before the
comment period deadline, the Agency encourages use of the Web site,
which is listed first. It will provide the most efficient and timely
method of receiving and processing your comments.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Unit; U.S. Department of
Transportation, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Ground floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., e.t., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this regulatory action. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided. The Department of
Transportation's (DOT) complete Privacy Act Statement was published in
the Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476), and can be viewed
at https://docketsinfo.dot.gov.
Public Participation: The regulations.gov system is generally
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can find
electronic submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the
``help'' section of the Web site. For notification that FMCSA received
the comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or
postcard, or print the acknowledgement page that appears after
submitting comments on line. Copies or abstracts of all documents
referenced in this notice are in the docket: FMCSA-2010-0149. For
access to the docket to read background documents or comments received,
go to https://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. All comments
received before the close of business on the comment closing date
indicated above will be considered and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above address. Comments received after
the closing date will be considered to the extent practicable. FMCSA
may, however, issue a final determination at any time after the close
of the comment period. In addition to late comments, FMCSA will also
continue to file in the public docket relevant information that becomes
available after the comment closing date. Interested persons should
monitor the public docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Falk, Office of Chief
Counsel, Adjudications Counsel (MC-CCA), FMCSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Tel. (202) 366-9304.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 113(f), Congress directed FMCSA to carry out the
duties and powers related to motor carriers or motor carrier safety
vested in the Secretary of Transportation by chapters 5, 51, 55, 57,
59, 133 through 149, 311, 313, 315 and 317 of title 49 of the U.S.
Code, except as otherwise delegated by the Secretary. Regulations
implementing this statutory authority include the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) (49 CFR parts 380-399), the Federal Motor
Carrier Commercial Regulations (FMCCRs) (49 CFR parts 360-379), and the
Federal Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMRs) (49 CFR parts 171-180).
FMCSA's enforcement powers include the general authority to conduct
administrative enforcement proceedings for violations of the FMCCRs (49
U.S.C. 14701) as well as to assess civil penalties for violations
related to commercial motor vehicle safety (49 U.S.C. chapter 5) and
hazardous materials (49 U.S.C. chapter 51).
In accordance with this authority, the Agency promulgated
regulations governing civil penalty and driver disqualification
proceedings before the Agency. These regulations are known as the Rules
of Practice for Motor Carrier, Intermodal Equipment Provider, Broker,
Freight Forwarder, and Hazardous Materials Proceedings (Rules of
Practice) and are codified at 49 CFR part 386.
In May 2005, the Agency amended the Rules of Practice to establish,
among other things, an informal hearing process as an option for
adjudicating administrative enforcement proceedings (see 70 FR 28467,
May 18, 2005). Civil penalty proceedings are initiated by issuance of a
Notice of Claim by a representative of the Agency (Claimant) pursuant
to 49 CFR 386.11(c). Under 49 CFR 386.14(b)(2), the party against whom
a claim is made (Respondent) must reply to the Notice of Claim by
electing one of three options: (1) Paying the full amount of the claim;
(2) contesting the claim by requesting administrative adjudication
pursuant to section 386.14(d); or (3) seeking binding arbitration in
accordance with the Agency's arbitration program. Under section
386.14(d)(1)(iii), a respondent electing administrative adjudication
may request that the matter be adjudicated either through: (A)
Submission of written evidence without hearing; (B) an informal
hearing; or (C) a formal hearing.
[[Page 32243]]
The informal hearing process was intended to provide expedited
consideration of a civil penalty case by a neutral third party without
the formalities attendant to a hearing before an Administrative Law
Judge (see 69 FR 61620, Oct. 20, 2004). Section 386.2 defines an
informal hearing as ``a hearing in which the parties have the
opportunity to present relevant evidence to a neutral Hearing Officer,
who will prepare findings of fact and recommendations for the Agency
decisionmaker. The informal hearing will not be on the transcribed
record and discovery will not be allowed. Parties will have the
opportunity to discuss their case and present testimony and evidence
before the Hearing Officer without the formality of a formal hearing.''
After receiving the hearing officer's report and recommendations, the
Assistant Administrator has the discretion to either adopt the report
or issue other orders as he or she deems appropriate. [See sections
386.16(b)(4)(i)(A) and 386.61(b)].
FMCSA implemented informal hearings on a graduated basis in order
to evaluate the efficacy of this new process. In the first phase of
implementation, FMCSA considered requests for informal hearings only
from respondents in the Midwestern Service Center's geographical area
(see 71 FR 13894, Mar. 17, 2006). In the second phase, FMCSA expanded
eligibility to respondents in the Eastern Service Center's geographical
area (see 72 FR 6806, Feb. 13, 2007). To date, only respondents located
in States within the Agency's Eastern and Midwestern Service Centers
have been eligible to request informal hearings.
Having evaluated the implementation of the informal hearing
procedure, FMCSA has concerns about the appropriateness of the
personnel the Agency assigned to serve as hearing officers. Section
386.2 defines ``hearing officer'' as ``a neutral Agency employee
designated by the Assistant Administrator to preside over an informal
hearing.'' The Agency selected two FMCSA employees--one located in the
Southern Service Center and one located in the Western Service Center--
to serve as hearing officers. However, the Agency did not receive
enough informal hearing requests to dedicate these employees as full-
time hearing officers. As a result, these employees continued to carry
out their existing responsibilities related to the implementation of
the enforcement programs in their respective Service Center areas.
Although, as noted above, informal hearings are not available to
respondents located in the Southern and Western Service Centers, there
is legitimate concern that FMCSA personnel involved in the Agency's
enforcement program may not be considered sufficiently neutral.
Suspension of Current Informal Hearing Procedure
After careful consideration, and as a result of the issues
discussed above, FMCSA has decided to suspend the use of informal
hearings for enforcement actions initiated after publication of this
notice pending re-evaluation of the informal hearing procedure. This
re-evaluation will include consideration of possible regulatory changes
as well as implementation strategies.
Five cases assigned to hearing officers are still awaiting informal
hearings. There are 15 additional cases in which claimants have
consented to respondents' informal hearing requests, but have not been
assigned to a hearing officer. Furthermore, in 13 additional cases,
claimants in the Eastern and Midwestern Service Centers have objected
to requests for informal hearings. The Agency has not yet ruled on
these objections because of its concerns regarding the informal hearing
procedure. In order to avoid further delaying the resolution of the 20
pending cases awaiting informal hearings or assignment of a hearing
officer, the Agency will assign these cases to one or more hearing
officers not connected with the Agency's enforcement program, who will
be responsible for initiating and concluding the informal hearing
process. The Agency will also make it a priority to consider the
pending objections to informal hearings and may thus assign additional
cases to the hearing officer(s), as appropriate.
Notices of Claim issued after publication of this notice in the
Federal Register will advise respondents seeking to contest a claim
through administrative adjudication that they may either submit written
evidence without a formal hearing or request a formal hearing.
FMCSA has determined that no Respondent has suffered substantive
harm or prejudice as a result of disposition under the informal hearing
option. Of the 11 cases assigned to hearing officers, only three were
finally resolved under the informal hearing procedure. In these cases,
the hearing officer issued a final report recommending that the
Assistant Administrator approve settlement agreements entered into by
the parties. The Assistant Administrator accepted the recommendations,
resulting in final disposition of these cases. With respect to the
other eight cases, six are awaiting informal hearings following
assignment of a hearing officer, one was settled before a specific
hearing officer was assigned, and the final case is awaiting further
action following issuance of the hearing officer's report.
Finally, FMCSA believes that, if implemented more effectively, re-
establishment of an informal hearing process would be beneficial to
both the Agency and to respondents seeking more informal resolution of
enforcement matters. FMCSA seeks public comment on options for
implementing an effective informal hearing process.
Issued on: May 28, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-13591 Filed 6-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P