Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency, 31702-31709 [2010-13470]
Download as PDF
31702
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Services are inapplicable. For purposes
of such appeals:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Revise § 1000.430 to read as
follows:
POSTAL SERVICE
§ 1000.430 Who handles appeals regarding
reassumption for imminent jeopardy?
ACTION:
Appeals regarding reassumption of
Title I-eligible PFSAs are handled by the
IBIA under the procedures in 25 CFR
900.171 through 900.176. Appeals
regarding reassumption of PFSAs that
are not Title I-eligible are handled by
the CBCA under the procedures in 48
CFR part 6101.
■ 17. Revise § 1000.431 to read as
follows:
§ 1000.431 Does the Equal Access to
Justice Act (EAJA) apply to appeals under
this subpart?
Yes. EAJA claims against the DOI will
be heard under 48 CFR 6101.30, 6101.31
(CBCA) and 43 CFR 4.602, 4.604
through 4.628 (DOI) and under the
Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. 504
and 28 U.S.C. 2412.
Dated: October 30, 2009.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary, Indian Affairs,
Department of the Interior.
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Yvette Roubideaux,
Director, Indian Health Service, Department
of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2010–13297 Filed 6–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–79–P
39 CFR PART 111
General Information on Postal Service
Postal Service.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service announces
the issuance of Issue 300, dated May 11,
2009, of the Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic
Mail Manual (DMM), and its
incorporation by reference in the Code
of Federal Regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on June 4, 2010. The
incorporation by reference of Issue 300,
May 11, 2009, of the DMM is approved
by the Director of the Federal Register
as of June 4, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lizbeth Dobbins (202) 268–3789.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The most
recent Issue 300 of the Domestic Mail
Manual (DMM) was issued on May 11,
2009.
This Issue of the DMM contains all
Postal Service domestic mailing
standards. This issue continues to
(1) increase the user’s ability to find
information, (2) increase confidence that
users have found all the information
they need, and (3) reduce the need to
consult multiple chapters of the Manual
to locate necessary information. Issue
300, dated May 11, 2009, set forth
specific changes, such as new standards
throughout the DMM to support the
Transmittal letter for issue publication
May 12, 2008 .................................................
May 11, 2009 .................................................
Administrative practice and
procedure, Incorporation by reference.
In view of the considerations
discussed above, the Postal Service
hereby amends 39 CFR Part 111 as
follows:
■
PART 111—GENERAL INFORMATION
ON POSTAL SERVICE
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
Part 111 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 13 U.S.C. 301–
307; 18 U.S.C. 1692–1737; 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 414, 416, 3001–3011, 3201–
3219, 3403–3406, 3621, 3622, 3626, 3632,
3633, 5001.
2. Amend § 111.3(f) by adding the
following new entry at the end of the
table: § 111.3 Amendment to the
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
■
Federal Register
■
3. Amend § 111.4 by removing ‘‘May
7, 2008’’ and adding ‘‘June 4, 2010’’.
[Insert FR citation for this Final Rule].
[Insert FR citation for this Final Rule].
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
40 CFR Part 7
[FR Doc. 2010–13356 Filed 6–3–10; 8:45 am]
[EPA–HQ–OA–2004–0002; FRL–9158–9]
RIN 2090–AA37
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age
in Programs or Activities Receiving
Federal Assistance from the
Environmental Protection Agency
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Dated
Issue 300 ........................................................
Issue 300 ........................................................
pricing changes approved by the
Governors of the United States Postal
Service. The new prices and standards
were effective May 11, 2009. Changes to
mailing standards will continue to be
published through Federal Register
notices and the Postal Bulletin, and will
appear in the next printed version of
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual,
and in the online version available via
Postal Explorer https://pe.usps.com.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action on Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Age in Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Assistance from the
Environmental Protection Agency. This
document sets out EPA rules for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
implementing the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended. The Act
prohibits discrimination on the basis of
age in programs or activities receiving
Federal assistance.
DATES: This rule is effective on October
4, 2010 without further notice, unless
EPA receives adverse comment by
August 3, 2010. If EPA receives adverse
comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OA–2004–0002, by one of the following
methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: docket.oei@epa.gov.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
• Fax: 202–566–0562.
• Mail: OEI Docket, U.S. EPA, Mail
Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand delivery: OEI Docket, EPA
Docket Center, Room 3334, EPA West
Building, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangement should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OA–2004–
0002. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
the OEI Docket in the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public
Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is 202–
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OEI Docket is 202–566–1752.
Submitting CBI: Do not submit this
information to EPA through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly
mark the part or all of the information
that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the
disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
identify electronically within the disk or
CD–ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that
includes information claimed as CBI, a
copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI
must be submitted for inclusion in the
public docket. Information so marked
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with procedure set forth in
40 CFR Part 2.
Tips for Preparing Your Comments
• Identify the rulemaking by docket
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date and page number).
• Follow directions—The agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
of section number.
• Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
• Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
• If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
• Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
alternatives.
• Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
• Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Walker, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Civil Rights, (Mail
Code 1201A), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone
(202) 343–9894.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31703
Why Is EPA Using a Direct Final Rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without a
prior proposed rule because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipate no adverse comment because
(1) entities that have applied for and
received assistance from EPA comply
with the Age Discrimination Act of
1975. This rule implements the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, and would
not substantively change existing
obligations for recipients. (2) The
current action has been reviewed and
approved by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), the
lead Federal agency that sets the
government-wide standards to be
followed by all Federal agencies
implementing the Age Discrimination
Act. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to the
Age Discrimination regulations if
adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a
second comment period on this action.
Any parties interested in the
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information about commenting
on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section
of this document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule.
I. General Information
These regulations implement
provisions of the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended. The Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C.
6101 et. seq., (The Act) prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age in
programs or activities receiving Federal
assistance. The Act applies to persons of
all ages. The Act also contains specific
exceptions that permit the use of certain
age distinctions and factors other than
age that meet the Act’s requirements.
The Act however, does not cover
employment discrimination on the basis
of age. The Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. 621
et. seq., (ADEA) applies specifically to
employment practices and programs,
both in the public and private sectors,
and applies only to persons 40 and over.
Complaints of employment
discrimination based on age against an
individual by recipients of Federal
financial assistance are subject to the
ADEA and should be filed
administratively with the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
31704
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
(EEOC) (see 29 CFR part 1626). The
EEOC has recently published in the
Federal Register a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) under the authority
of the ADEA (see 75 FR 7212 (Feb. 18,
2010)). EEOC’s NPRM defines the term
‘‘reasonable factors other than age’’
(RFOA) under the ADEA, a term that is
also used in the Age Discrimination Act
and in the subject regulation. Because of
the different statutory bases for the two
regulations, the use of the term RFOA in
EPA’s regulation implementing the Age
Discrimination Act has no effect on
EEOC’s regulation under the ADEA and
the use of the term RFOA in EEOC’s
regulation has no effect on EPA’s
regulation. Nonetheless, EPA would
accept comments about any potential
impact of EEOC’s definition on EPA’s
regulation. Parties interested in the
ADEA action should refer to the Federal
Register; 75 FR 7212 (Feb. 18, 2010).
The Act required the former
Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare (HEW) to issue general,
government-wide regulations setting
standards to be followed by all Federal
agencies implementing the Act. These
government-wide regulations, which
were issued on June 12, 1979, (45 CFR
part 90; 44 FR 33768) and became
effective on July 1, 1979, required each
Federal agency providing assistance to
any program or activity to publish final
regulations implementing the Act, and
to submit final agency regulations to
HEW (now the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)), before
publication in the Federal Register. (See
45 CFR 90.31.) The Act became effective
on the effective date of HEW’s final
government-wide regulations (i.e., July
1, 1979). The Act was amended by the
Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987,
Public Law 100–259, 102 Stat. 28, to
add a definition for the term ‘‘program
or activity.’’
The Age discrimination regulations
apply to all applicants for, and
recipients of, EPA assistance in the
operation of their programs or activities,
and only establish and enforce statutory
rights that prohibit discrimination on
the basis of age. These regulations do
not apply to any program or activity
unless that program or activity applies
for and/or receives Federal assistance
from the Agency.
EPA’s Age discrimination regulations
which implement the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, will amend
the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (40
CFR Part 7) by adding Age as a
protected classification to the Agency’s
nondiscrimination regulations.
Currently, the Agency’s
nondiscrimination regulations prohibit
discrimination on the basis of race,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
color, national origin, sex (gender), or
disability in any program or activity
receiving EPA assistance. The Age
Discrimination regulations will become
the new Part 7 Subpart F—
Discrimination Prohibited on the Basis
of Age.
The regulation states, ‘‘No person in
the United States may, on the basis of
age, be excluded from participation in,
be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any
program or activity receiving EPA
assistance.’’ (40 CFR 7.140) The specific
prohibited actions are patterned after
the regulations issued under Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (40 CFR
7.30). As a general rule, separate or
different treatment which denies or
limits services from, or participation in,
a program receiving Federal funds will
be prohibited by these regulations.
The Act does include some
exceptions to the general rule against
age discrimination. The regulations
provide definitions for two terms
‘‘normal operations’’ and ‘‘statutory
objective’’ (40 CFR 7.25) that provide the
framework for which the exceptions can
apply. (40 CFR 7.150) For example, the
normal operations and objectives of our
public schools are to educate our
nation’s children. Public schools, for
instance, have received Federal
environmental grants, to establish
ecology clubs or educate students on
water restoration and beach ecology.
These school programs are just a few
examples of recipients operating under
normal conditions and meeting their
objectives while receiving Federal
assistance targeted at a specific age
group, and are therefore, permissible
under the Act.
Recipients of EPA funds are also
permitted to take an action otherwise
prohibited by the Act, if the action is
based on ‘‘reasonable factors other than
age.’’ (40 CFR 7.155) For example,
children may be more vulnerable to
environmental exposures (i.e. lead
poisoning) than adults because their
bodily systems are still developing.
Providing grants to recipients to
research these specific exposure risks in
children play an important role in
protecting children’s health. Even
though environmental toxins may also
affect adults, it is thought that children
are generally more vulnerable to such
environmental exposures. Thus,
recipients that are solely studying the
unique environmental exposure risks to
children (targeting a specific age group)
are taking actions based on ‘‘reasonable
factors other than age’’, and, such
studies are therefore permissible under
the Act. As noted above, the use of the
term ‘‘reasonable factors other than age’’
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in EPA’s regulation has no effect on
EEOC’s RFOA definition under the
ADEA and, conversely, the use of the
term RFOA by the EEOC has no effect
on EPA’s regulation.
In addition, these regulations
incorporate the provisions of the general
regulations (45 CFR part 90; 44 FR
33768) permitting a recipient of a
program to provide special benefits for
children and the elderly. (40 CFR 7.165)
These special benefits often take the
form of special discounts or reduced
fees for the elderly or children in a
Federally funded program.
II. Rulemaking History
EPA first proposed regulations
implementing the Age Discrimination
Act as part of its proposed consolidated
nondiscrimination regulations on
January 8, 1981 (46 FR 2306–2312). The
Age Discrimination Act provisions were
not included in the final rule published
on January 12, 1984 (49 FR 1656–66),
because they had not been approved by
HHS as required by the Act. During
1993 through 1998, the regulations were
submitted to HHS and went through
different revisions in an on-going effort
between EPA and HHS. Because of the
time lapse since the regulations were
initially drafted, in 2002 EPA had
conducted an internal re-review of the
draft regulations. The draft Age
Discrimination Act regulations were
then resubmitted to HHS in 2002, which
granted its approval later that year. In
January 2003, new regulatory
development guidelines were issued,
which spurred another delay in the
publication of EPA’s draft Age
regulations. Between 2003 and 2004,
EPA’s internal re-review resulted in
various revisions to the draft regulations
based on the new regulatory
development guidelines. In 2005, EPA
resubmitted its final draft Age
discrimination regulations to HHS. The
revised regulations were subsequently
approved by HHS in 2006. EPA is now
publishing these regulations as a direct
final rule along, with a parallel
proposed rule. Any comments
submitted during the 1981, public
comment period pertaining to the Age
provisions of the consolidated
nondiscrimination regulations are no
longer available for viewing. Comments
on the current rule are welcome. If EPA
receives public comment on the current
direct final rule, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based on the
current parallel proposed rule as
mentioned above.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
III. Statutory and Executive Orders
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is a ‘‘significant regulatory
action.’’ Accordingly, EPA submitted
this action to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review under EO
12866 and any changes made in
response to OMB recommendations
have been documented in the docket for
this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden. EPA
Form 4700–4 (Preaward Compliance
Review Report for All Applicants
Requesting Federal Assistance), which
is used to collect compliance
information under EPA’s
nondiscrimination regulations, already
requests civil rights compliance
information based on age under the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975. The current
version, which also requests civil rights
compliance information based on race,
color, national origin, sex, or handicap
as well as age, has been in use since
January 1990. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
previously approved the information
collection requirements contained in the
existing regulations at 40 CFR Part 7
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
and has assigned OMB control number
2030–0020. The OMB control numbers
for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are
listed in 40 CFR Part 9.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of today’s rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business
as defined by the U.S. Small Business
Administration in 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a
small governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of today’s direct final rule on
small entities, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This direct final rule will not
impose any requirements on small
entities because it only formalizes
existing requirements for entities
receiving assistance from EPA and
would not substantively change existing
obligations on recipients. The
requirements prohibiting age
discrimination by recipients of Federal
assistance that are in the Age
Discrimination Act and the governmentwide regulations have been in effect
since 1979.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and Tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result
in expenditures to State, local, and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. Before
promulgating an EPA rule for which a
written statement is needed, section 205
of the UMRA generally requires EPA to
identify and consider a reasonable
number of regulatory alternatives and
adopt the least costly, most costeffective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule.
The provisions of section 205 do not
apply when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows EPA to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective
or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including Tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31705
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
Today’s rule contains no Federal
mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA for
State, local, or Tribal governments or
the private sector for the following
reasons: (1) The UMRA excludes from
the definitions of ‘‘Federal
intergovernmental mandate’’ and
‘‘Federal private sector mandate’’ duties
that arise from conditions of Federal
assistance; (2) The UMRA generally
excludes from the definition of ‘‘Federal
intergovernmental mandate’’ duties that
arise from participation in a voluntary
Federal program; (3) The UMRA
excludes from the definition of ‘‘Federal
private sector mandate’’ duties that arise
from participation in a voluntary
Federal program; and (4) The UMRA
does not apply to rules that establish or
enforce statutory rights that prohibit
discrimination on the basis of race,
color, religion, sex, national origin, age,
handicap, or disability. These
regulations were mandated by Congress
in the Act. These regulations only
establish and enforce statutory rights
that prohibit discrimination on the basis
of age. These regulations do not apply
to any program or activity unless that
program or activity applies for and
receives Federal assistance from the
Agency. Application for, and receipt of,
Federal assistance from the Agency is
entirely voluntary. No program or
activity is required to apply for, or
accept, Federal assistance from the
Agency. Thus, today’s rule is not subject
to the requirements of sections 202 and
205 of the UMRA.
EPA has determined that this rule
contains no regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. These regulations
apply uniformly to all recipients of
Federal assistance from the Agency,
regardless of whether the recipient is a
small government. Moreover, the
application for, and acceptance of,
Federal assistance from the Agency that
triggers the applicability of these
regulations is entirely voluntary.
Furthermore, it has already been
determined that these regulations will
not have a significant economic impact
on small entities.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255),
entitled ‘‘Federalism,’’ requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive Order to
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31706
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
This direct final rule does not have
federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This rule does
not directly impose any obligations on
the States and there are no significant
compliance costs associated with it.
This rule only applies to State and nonState entities that apply for and receive
assistance from EPA. When the
recipient receives the EPA assistance,
they accept the obligation to comply
with EPA’s Age Discrimination Act
implementing regulations. Compliance
obligations are, therefore, voluntary and
contractual. No entity is required to
apply for or accept EPA assistance.
Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not
apply to this rule.
In the spirit of Executive Order 13132,
and consistent with EPA policy to
promote communications between EPA
and State and local governments, EPA
specifically solicits comment on this
direct final rule from State and local
officials.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249),
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by Tribal officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have Tribal implications.’’ This direct
final rule does not have Tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This rule does not directly
impose any obligations on the Tribes
and there are no significant compliance
costs associated with it. This rule only
applies to Tribal and non-Tribal entities
that apply for and receive assistance
from EPA. When the recipient receives
the EPA assistance, it accepts the
obligation to comply with EPA’s Age
Discrimination Act implementing
regulations. Compliance obligations are,
therefore, voluntary and contractual. No
entity is required to apply for or accept
EPA assistance. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this rule. EPA
specifically solicits additional comment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
on this direct final rule from Tribal
officials.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health &
Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885),
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks,’’ applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that are based on health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Order has
the potential to influence the regulation.
This direct final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does
not establish an environmental standard
intended to mitigate health or safety
risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ as defined in Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)) because it is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
EPA is taking action to approve rules for
implementing the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended. The Act
prohibits discrimination on the basis of
age in programs or activities receiving
Federal assistance. Accordingly, we
have concluded that this rule is not
likely to have any adverse energy
effects.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272n) directs
EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards. This
direct final rulemaking does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, EPA is
not considering the use of any voluntary
consensus standards. EPA welcomes
comments on this aspect of the direct
final rulemaking and, specifically,
invites the public to identify
potentially-applicable voluntary
consensus standards and to explain why
such standards should be used in this
regulation.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629
(Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. EPA is taking action to
approve rules for implementing the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as
amended. The Act prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age in
programs or activities receiving Federal
assistance. This rule does not adversely
affect minority or low-income
populations therefore, we have
concluded that this rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A Major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective October 4, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 7
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Age discrimination, Civil rights, Equal
employment opportunity, Individuals
with disabilities, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sex
discrimination.
Dated: May 27, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
40 CFR part 7 is amended as follows:
■
PART 7—NONDISCRIMINATION IN
PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES
RECEIVING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
§ 7.80
1. The authority citation for part 7 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d–7 and
6101 et seq.; 29 U.S.C. 794; 33 U.S.C. 1251nt.
2. Section 7.10 is revised to read as
follows:
■
Purpose of this part.
This part implements: Title VI of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended;
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, as amended; the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as
amended; and section 13 of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act
Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92–
500, (collectively, the Acts).
3. Section 7.25 is amended by adding
the definitions for ‘‘Action,’’ ‘‘Age,’’ ‘‘Age
distinction,’’ ‘‘Age-related term,’’
‘‘Normal operation,’’ and ‘‘Statutory
objective’’ in alphabetical order to read
as follows:
■
§ 7.25
Definitions.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
Action, for purposes of subpart F of
this part, means any act, activity, policy,
rule, standard, or method of
administration; or the use of any policy,
rule, standard, or method of
administration.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
Applicants.
*
■
§ 7.10
Age, for purposes of subpart F of this
part, means how old a person is, or the
number of elapsed years from the date
of a person’s birth.
Age distinction, for purposes of
subpart F of this part, means any action
using age or an age-related term.
Age-related term, for purposes of
subpart F of this part, means a word or
words which necessarily imply a
particular age or range of ages (for
example; ‘‘children,’’ ‘‘adult,’’ ‘‘older
persons,’’ but not ‘‘student’’ or ‘‘grade’’).
*
*
*
*
*
Normal operation, for purposes of
subpart F of this part, means the
operation of a program or activity
without significant changes that would
impair its ability to meet its objectives.
*
*
*
*
*
Statutory objective, for purposes of
subpart F of this part, means any
purpose of a program or activity
expressly stated in any Federal statute,
State statute, or local statute or
ordinance adopted by an elected,
general purpose legislative body.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Section 7.80(c)(1) is revised to read
as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Notice of any lawsuit pending
against the applicant alleging
discrimination on the basis of race,
color, sex, age, handicap, or national
origin;
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 7.85 is amended by revising
paragraph (a)(2), by redesignating the
introductory text of paragraph (c) after
the heading as paragraph (c)(1), and
adding paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 7.85
Recipients.
(a) * * *
(2) Racial/ethnic, national origin, age,
sex and handicap data, or EPA Form
4700–4 information submitted with its
application;
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Self-evaluation. (1) * * *
(2) Each recipient employing the
equivalent of 15 or more full time
employees may be required to complete
a written self-evaluation of its
compliance under the Age
Discrimination Act as part of a
compliance review or complaint
investigation. This self-evaluation will
pertain to any age distinction imposed
in its program or activity receiving
Federal assistance from EPA. If
required, each recipient’s selfevaluation shall identify and justify
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31707
each age distinction imposed by the
recipient and each recipient shall take
corrective and remedial action
whenever a self-evaluation indicates a
violation of the Age Discrimination Act.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. The first sentence in § 7.95(a) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 7.95
Notice of nondiscrimination.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Requirements. A recipient shall
provide initial and continuing notice
that it does not discriminate on the basis
of race, color, national origin, age, or
handicap in a program or activity
receiving EPA assistance or, in programs
or activities covered by section 13, on
the basis of sex. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. The third sentence in § 7.110(a) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 7.110
Preaward compliance.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * * When the OCR cannot make
a determination on the basis of this
information, additional information will
be requested from the applicant, local
government officials, or interested
persons or organizations, including aged
and handicapped persons or
organizations representing such
persons. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Section 7.120 is amended by adding
a new fifth sentence to paragraph (a)
and adding paragraph (d)(1)(iv) to read
as follows:
§ 7.120
Complaint investigations.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Who may file a complaint. * * *
Complaints of employment
discrimination based on age against an
individual by recipients of Federal
financial assistance are subject to the
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
of 1967 and should be filed
administratively with the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission
(see 29 CFR part 1626). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Complaints alleging age
discrimination under the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 will be
referred to a mediation agency in
accordance with § 7.180.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. A new subpart F, consisting of
§§ 7.140 through 7.180, is added to read
as follows:
Subpart F—Discrimination Prohibited on
the Basis of Age
Sec.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31708
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
7.140 General prohibition.
7.145 Specific prohibitions.
7.150 Exceptions to the rules against age
discrimination—normal operation or
statutory objective of any program or
activity.
7.155 Exceptions to the rules against age
discrimination—reasonable factors other
than age.
7.160 Burden of proof.
7.165 Special benefits for children and the
elderly.
7.170 Alternative funds disbursal
procedures.
7.175 Exhaustion of administrative remedy.
7.180 Mediation of age discrimination
complaints.
Subpart F—Discrimination Prohibited
on the Basis of Age
§ 7.140
General prohibition.
No person in the United States may,
on the basis of age, be excluded from
participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination
under any program or activity receiving
EPA assistance.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 7.145
Specific prohibitions.
(a) As to any program or activity
receiving EPA assistance, a recipient
shall not directly or through contractual,
licensing, or other arrangements on the
basis of age:
(1) Exclude any individuals from,
deny them the service, aid or benefits of,
or subject them to discrimination under,
a program or activity;
(2) Provide a person any service, aid
or other benefit that is different, or is
provided differently from that provided
to others under the program or activity;
(3) Restrict a person in any way in the
enjoyment of any advantage or privilege
enjoyed by others receiving any service,
aid, or benefit provided by the program
or activity;
(4) Subject a person to segregation in
any manner or separate treatment in any
way related to receiving services or
benefits under the program or activity;
(5) Deny a person or any group of
persons the opportunity to participate as
members of any planning or advisory
body which is an integral part of the
program or activity, such as a local
sanitation board or sewer authority;
(6) In administering a program or
activity receiving Federal financial
assistance in which the recipient has
previously discriminated on the basis of
age, the recipient shall take affirmative
action to provide remedies to those who
have been injured by the discrimination.
(b) A recipient shall not use criteria or
methods of administering its program or
activity which have the effect of
subjecting individuals to discrimination
because of their age, or have the effect
of defeating or substantially impairing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
accomplishment of the objectives of the
program or activity with respect to
individuals of a particular age.
(c) A recipient shall not choose a site
or location of a facility that has the
purpose or effect of excluding
individuals from, denying them the
benefits of, or subjecting them to
discrimination under any program or
activity to which this part applies on the
ground of age; or with the purpose or
effect of defeating or substantially
impairing the accomplishment of the
objectives of this subpart.
(d) The specific prohibitions of
discrimination enumerated above do not
limit the general prohibition of § 7.140.
§ 7.150 Exceptions to the rules against age
discrimination—normal operation or
statutory objective of any program or
activity.
A recipient is permitted to take an
action, otherwise prohibited by §§ 7.140
and 7.145, if the action reasonably takes
into account age as a factor necessary to
the normal operation or achievement of
any statutory objective of a program or
activity. An action reasonably takes into
account age as a factor necessary to the
normal operation or the achievement of
any statutory objective of a program or
activity if:
(a) Age is used as a measure or
approximation of one or more other
characteristics;
(b) The other characteristic(s) must be
measured or approximated in order for
the normal operation of the program or
activity to continue, or to achieve any
statutory objective of the program or
activity;
(c) The other characteristic(s) can be
reasonably measured or approximated
by the use of age; and
(d) The other characteristic(s) are
impractical to measure directly on an
individual basis.
§ 7.155 Exceptions to the rules against age
discrimination—reasonable factors other
than age.
A recipient is permitted to take an
action otherwise prohibited by §§ 7.140
and 7.145 which is based on a factor
other than age, even though that action
may have a disproportionate effect on
persons of different ages. An action may
be based on a factor other than age only
if the factor bears a direct and
substantial relationship to the normal
operation of the program or activity or
to the achievement of a statutory
objective.
§ 7.160
Burden of proof.
The burden of proving that an age
distinction or other action falls within
the exceptions outlined in §§ 7.150 and
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7.155 is on the recipient of EPA
financial assistance.
§ 7.165 Special benefits for children and
the elderly.
If a recipient operating a program
which serves the elderly or children in
addition to persons of other ages,
provides special benefits to the elderly
or to children the provision of those
benefits shall be presumed to be
voluntary affirmative action provided
that it does not have the effect of
excluding otherwise eligible persons
from participation in the program.
§ 7.170 Alternative funds disbursal
procedures.
(a) When EPA withholds funds from
a recipient under Subpart F of these
regulations, the Administrator may
disburse the withheld funds directly to
an alternate recipient: Any public or
non-profit private organization or
agency, or State or political subdivision
of the State.
(b) The Administrator will require any
alternate recipient to demonstrate the
ability to achieve the goals of the
Federal statute authorizing the funds
and these regulations (40 CFR Part 7).
§ 7.175 Exhaustion of administrative
remedy.
(a) A complainant may file a civil
action following the exhaustion of
administrative remedies under the Age
Discrimination Act. Administrative
remedies are exhausted if:
(1) 180 days have elapsed since the
complainant filed the complaint and
EPA has made no finding with regard to
the complaint; or
(2) EPA issues any finding in favor of
the recipient.
(b) If EPA fails to make a finding
within 180 days or issues a finding in
favor of the recipient, EPA shall:
(1) Promptly advise the complainant
of this fact; and
(2) Advise the complainant of his or
her right to bring a civil action for
injunctive relief; and
(3) Inform the complainant that:
(i) The complainant may bring a civil
action only in a United States district
court for the district in which the
recipient is found or transacts business;
(ii) A complainant prevailing in a
civil action has the right to be awarded
the costs of the action, including
reasonable attorney’s fees, but that the
complainant must demand these costs
in the complaint;
(iii) Before commencing the action,
the complainant shall give 30 days
notice by registered mail to the
Secretary of the Department of Health
and Human Services, the Administrator,
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
the Attorney General of the United
States, and the recipient;
(iv) The notice must state: The alleged
violation of the Age Discrimination Act;
the relief requested; the court in which
the complainant is bringing the action;
and, whether or not attorney’s fees are
demanded in the event the complainant
prevails; and
(v) The complainant may not bring an
action if the same alleged violation of
the Age Discrimination Act by the same
recipient is the subject of a pending
action in any court of the United States.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 7.180 Mediation of age discrimination
complaints.
(a) The OCR will refer all accepted
complaints alleging age discrimination
to the Mediation Agency designated by
the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services.
(b) Both the complainant and the
recipient must participate in the
mediation process to the extent
necessary to reach an agreement or
make an informed judgment that an
agreement is not possible. The recipient
and the complainant must meet with the
mediator at least once before the OCR
will accept a judgment that an
agreement is not possible. The recipient
and the complainant, however, need not
meet with the mediator at the same
time.
(c) If the complainant and the
recipient reach an agreement, the
mediator must prepare a written
statement of the agreement and have the
complainant and recipient sign it. The
mediator will send a copy of the
agreement to the OCR, which will take
no further action on the complaint
unless the complainant or the recipient
fails to comply with the agreement.
(d) The mediator must protect the
confidentiality of all information
obtained in the course of the mediation
process. No mediator may testify in any
adjudicative proceeding, produce any
document, or otherwise disclose any
information obtained in the course of
the mediation process without prior
approval of the head of the agency
appointing the mediator.
(e) Mediation ends after sixty (60)
days from the time EPA received the
complaint or if:
(1) An agreement is reached; or
(2) The Mediator determines that an
agreement cannot be reached.
(f) The mediator must return
unresolved complaints to OCR to be
processed in accordance with the
procedure in § 7.120.
[FR Doc. 2010–13470 Filed 6–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6650–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0957; FRL–9158–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonable Further
Progress Plan, 2002 Base Year
Emission Inventory, Contingency
Measures, Reasonably Available
Control Measures, and Transportation
Conformity Budgets for the Baltimore
1997 8-Hour Moderate Ozone
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP) to meet the 2002 base year
emissions inventory, the reasonable
further progress (RFP) plan, RFP
contingency measure, and reasonably
available control measure (RACM)
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the Baltimore moderate 1997 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area. EPA is also
approving the transportation conformity
motor vehicle emissions budgets
(MVEBs) associated with this revision.
EPA is approving the SIP revision
because it satisfies the emission
inventory, RFP, RACM, RFP
contingency measures, and
transportation conformity requirements
for areas classified as moderate
nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour
ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS) and demonstrates
further progress in reducing ozone
precursors. EPA is approving the SIP
revision pursuant to the CAA and EPA’s
regulations.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective on July 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0957. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31709
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland, 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by
e-mail at pino.maria@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On January 7, 2010 (75 FR 958), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of Maryland’s 2002 base year emissions
inventory, RFP plan, RFP contingency
measures, RACM, and MVEBs for the
Baltimore moderate 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. EPA is approving
the SIP revision because it satisfies the
emission inventory, RFP, RACM, RFP
contingency measure, and
transportation conformity requirements
of the section 110 and part D of the CAA
and EPA’s regulations. The formal SIP
revision was submitted by the State of
Maryland on June 4, 2007.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The SIP revision addresses emissions
inventory, RACM, RFP and contingency
measures requirements for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Baltimore
8-hour ozone moderate nonattainment
area. The SIP revision also establishes
MVEBs for 2008. Other specific
requirements of Maryland’s June 4, 2007
SIP revision for the Baltimore 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area and the
rationale for EPA’s proposed action are
explained in the NPR and will not be
restated here. No public comments were
received on the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the 2002 base year
emissions inventory; the 2008 ozone
projected emission inventory; the 2008
RFP plan; RFP contingency measures;
RACM analysis; and 2008 transportation
conformity budgets for the Baltimore
8-hour ozone nonattainment area,
contained in Maryland’s June 4, 2007
SIP revision submittal for the Baltimore
8-hour ozone nonattainment area. The
SIP revision satisfies the requirements
for 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
nonattainment areas classified as
moderate and demonstrates further
progress in reducing ozone precursors.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31702-31709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13470]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 7
[EPA-HQ-OA-2004-0002; FRL-9158-9]
RIN 2090-AA37
Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Age in Programs or Activities
Receiving Federal Assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on Nondiscrimination on the
Basis of Age in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance
from the Environmental Protection Agency. This document sets out EPA
rules for implementing the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended.
The Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs or
activities receiving Federal assistance.
DATES: This rule is effective on October 4, 2010 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by August 3, 2010. If EPA
receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-
2004-0002, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: docket.oei@epa.gov.
[[Page 31703]]
Fax: 202-566-0562.
Mail: OEI Docket, U.S. EPA, Mail Code: 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand delivery: OEI Docket, EPA Docket Center, Room 3334,
EPA West Building, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangement should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2004-
0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OEI Docket in the
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the
telephone number for the OEI Docket is 202-566-1752.
Submitting CBI: Do not submit this information to EPA through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedure set forth in 40 CFR Part 2.
Tips for Preparing Your Comments
Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part of section number.
Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Walker, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Civil Rights, (Mail Code 1201A), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, telephone (202) 343-9894.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Why Is EPA Using a Direct Final Rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse
comment because (1) entities that have applied for and received
assistance from EPA comply with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975.
This rule implements the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and would not
substantively change existing obligations for recipients. (2) The
current action has been reviewed and approved by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), the lead Federal agency that sets the
government-wide standards to be followed by all Federal agencies
implementing the Age Discrimination Act. However, in the ``Proposed
Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to the Age
Discrimination regulations if adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in the commenting must do so at
this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see
the ADDRESSES section of this document.
If EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. We would address all public
comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
I. General Information
These regulations implement provisions of the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, 42 U.S.C.
6101 et. seq., (The Act) prohibits discrimination on the basis of age
in programs or activities receiving Federal assistance. The Act applies
to persons of all ages. The Act also contains specific exceptions that
permit the use of certain age distinctions and factors other than age
that meet the Act's requirements. The Act however, does not cover
employment discrimination on the basis of age. The Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. 621 et. seq., (ADEA) applies
specifically to employment practices and programs, both in the public
and private sectors, and applies only to persons 40 and over.
Complaints of employment discrimination based on age against an
individual by recipients of Federal financial assistance are subject to
the ADEA and should be filed administratively with the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission
[[Page 31704]]
(EEOC) (see 29 CFR part 1626). The EEOC has recently published in the
Federal Register a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) under the
authority of the ADEA (see 75 FR 7212 (Feb. 18, 2010)). EEOC's NPRM
defines the term ``reasonable factors other than age'' (RFOA) under the
ADEA, a term that is also used in the Age Discrimination Act and in the
subject regulation. Because of the different statutory bases for the
two regulations, the use of the term RFOA in EPA's regulation
implementing the Age Discrimination Act has no effect on EEOC's
regulation under the ADEA and the use of the term RFOA in EEOC's
regulation has no effect on EPA's regulation. Nonetheless, EPA would
accept comments about any potential impact of EEOC's definition on
EPA's regulation. Parties interested in the ADEA action should refer to
the Federal Register; 75 FR 7212 (Feb. 18, 2010).
The Act required the former Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare (HEW) to issue general, government-wide regulations setting
standards to be followed by all Federal agencies implementing the Act.
These government-wide regulations, which were issued on June 12, 1979,
(45 CFR part 90; 44 FR 33768) and became effective on July 1, 1979,
required each Federal agency providing assistance to any program or
activity to publish final regulations implementing the Act, and to
submit final agency regulations to HEW (now the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS)), before publication in the Federal Register.
(See 45 CFR 90.31.) The Act became effective on the effective date of
HEW's final government-wide regulations (i.e., July 1, 1979). The Act
was amended by the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Public Law
100-259, 102 Stat. 28, to add a definition for the term ``program or
activity.''
The Age discrimination regulations apply to all applicants for, and
recipients of, EPA assistance in the operation of their programs or
activities, and only establish and enforce statutory rights that
prohibit discrimination on the basis of age. These regulations do not
apply to any program or activity unless that program or activity
applies for and/or receives Federal assistance from the Agency.
EPA's Age discrimination regulations which implement the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, will amend the U.S. Code of Federal
Regulations (40 CFR Part 7) by adding Age as a protected classification
to the Agency's nondiscrimination regulations. Currently, the Agency's
nondiscrimination regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of
race, color, national origin, sex (gender), or disability in any
program or activity receiving EPA assistance. The Age Discrimination
regulations will become the new Part 7 Subpart F--Discrimination
Prohibited on the Basis of Age.
The regulation states, ``No person in the United States may, on the
basis of age, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits
of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity
receiving EPA assistance.'' (40 CFR 7.140) The specific prohibited
actions are patterned after the regulations issued under Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (40 CFR 7.30). As a general rule, separate
or different treatment which denies or limits services from, or
participation in, a program receiving Federal funds will be prohibited
by these regulations.
The Act does include some exceptions to the general rule against
age discrimination. The regulations provide definitions for two terms
``normal operations'' and ``statutory objective'' (40 CFR 7.25) that
provide the framework for which the exceptions can apply. (40 CFR
7.150) For example, the normal operations and objectives of our public
schools are to educate our nation's children. Public schools, for
instance, have received Federal environmental grants, to establish
ecology clubs or educate students on water restoration and beach
ecology. These school programs are just a few examples of recipients
operating under normal conditions and meeting their objectives while
receiving Federal assistance targeted at a specific age group, and are
therefore, permissible under the Act.
Recipients of EPA funds are also permitted to take an action
otherwise prohibited by the Act, if the action is based on ``reasonable
factors other than age.'' (40 CFR 7.155) For example, children may be
more vulnerable to environmental exposures (i.e. lead poisoning) than
adults because their bodily systems are still developing. Providing
grants to recipients to research these specific exposure risks in
children play an important role in protecting children's health. Even
though environmental toxins may also affect adults, it is thought that
children are generally more vulnerable to such environmental exposures.
Thus, recipients that are solely studying the unique environmental
exposure risks to children (targeting a specific age group) are taking
actions based on ``reasonable factors other than age'', and, such
studies are therefore permissible under the Act. As noted above, the
use of the term ``reasonable factors other than age'' in EPA's
regulation has no effect on EEOC's RFOA definition under the ADEA and,
conversely, the use of the term RFOA by the EEOC has no effect on EPA's
regulation.
In addition, these regulations incorporate the provisions of the
general regulations (45 CFR part 90; 44 FR 33768) permitting a
recipient of a program to provide special benefits for children and the
elderly. (40 CFR 7.165) These special benefits often take the form of
special discounts or reduced fees for the elderly or children in a
Federally funded program.
II. Rulemaking History
EPA first proposed regulations implementing the Age Discrimination
Act as part of its proposed consolidated nondiscrimination regulations
on January 8, 1981 (46 FR 2306-2312). The Age Discrimination Act
provisions were not included in the final rule published on January 12,
1984 (49 FR 1656-66), because they had not been approved by HHS as
required by the Act. During 1993 through 1998, the regulations were
submitted to HHS and went through different revisions in an on-going
effort between EPA and HHS. Because of the time lapse since the
regulations were initially drafted, in 2002 EPA had conducted an
internal re-review of the draft regulations. The draft Age
Discrimination Act regulations were then resubmitted to HHS in 2002,
which granted its approval later that year. In January 2003, new
regulatory development guidelines were issued, which spurred another
delay in the publication of EPA's draft Age regulations. Between 2003
and 2004, EPA's internal re-review resulted in various revisions to the
draft regulations based on the new regulatory development guidelines.
In 2005, EPA resubmitted its final draft Age discrimination regulations
to HHS. The revised regulations were subsequently approved by HHS in
2006. EPA is now publishing these regulations as a direct final rule
along, with a parallel proposed rule. Any comments submitted during the
1981, public comment period pertaining to the Age provisions of the
consolidated nondiscrimination regulations are no longer available for
viewing. Comments on the current rule are welcome. If EPA receives
public comment on the current direct final rule, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that
this direct final rule will not take effect. We would address all
public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the current
parallel proposed rule as mentioned above.
[[Page 31705]]
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
Under Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is a ``significant regulatory action.'' Accordingly, EPA
submitted this action to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under EO 12866 and any changes made in response to OMB
recommendations have been documented in the docket for this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
EPA Form 4700-4 (Preaward Compliance Review Report for All Applicants
Requesting Federal Assistance), which is used to collect compliance
information under EPA's nondiscrimination regulations, already requests
civil rights compliance information based on age under the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975. The current version, which also requests
civil rights compliance information based on race, color, national
origin, sex, or handicap as well as age, has been in use since January
1990. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved
the information collection requirements contained in the existing
regulations at 40 CFR Part 7 under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control
number 2030-0020. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR Part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the U.S. Small Business Administration in 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a
small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county,
town, school district or special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of today's direct final rule
on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This direct final rule will not impose any requirements on small
entities because it only formalizes existing requirements for entities
receiving assistance from EPA and would not substantively change
existing obligations on recipients. The requirements prohibiting age
discrimination by recipients of Federal assistance that are in the Age
Discrimination Act and the government-wide regulations have been in
effect since 1979.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and Tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including Tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
Today's rule contains no Federal mandates under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA for State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector for the following reasons: (1) The
UMRA excludes from the definitions of ``Federal intergovernmental
mandate'' and ``Federal private sector mandate'' duties that arise from
conditions of Federal assistance; (2) The UMRA generally excludes from
the definition of ``Federal intergovernmental mandate'' duties that
arise from participation in a voluntary Federal program; (3) The UMRA
excludes from the definition of ``Federal private sector mandate''
duties that arise from participation in a voluntary Federal program;
and (4) The UMRA does not apply to rules that establish or enforce
statutory rights that prohibit discrimination on the basis of race,
color, religion, sex, national origin, age, handicap, or disability.
These regulations were mandated by Congress in the Act. These
regulations only establish and enforce statutory rights that prohibit
discrimination on the basis of age. These regulations do not apply to
any program or activity unless that program or activity applies for and
receives Federal assistance from the Agency. Application for, and
receipt of, Federal assistance from the Agency is entirely voluntary.
No program or activity is required to apply for, or accept, Federal
assistance from the Agency. Thus, today's rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
EPA has determined that this rule contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. These regulations apply uniformly to all recipients of
Federal assistance from the Agency, regardless of whether the recipient
is a small government. Moreover, the application for, and acceptance
of, Federal assistance from the Agency that triggers the applicability
of these regulations is entirely voluntary. Furthermore, it has already
been determined that these regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on small entities.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255), entitled ``Federalism,''
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies
that have federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order
to
[[Page 31706]]
include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.''
This direct final rule does not have federalism implications. It
will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This rule does not
directly impose any obligations on the States and there are no
significant compliance costs associated with it. This rule only applies
to State and non-State entities that apply for and receive assistance
from EPA. When the recipient receives the EPA assistance, they accept
the obligation to comply with EPA's Age Discrimination Act implementing
regulations. Compliance obligations are, therefore, voluntary and
contractual. No entity is required to apply for or accept EPA
assistance. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule.
In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with EPA
policy to promote communications between EPA and State and local
governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this direct final
rule from State and local officials.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249), entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by
Tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
Tribal implications.'' This direct final rule does not have Tribal
implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. This rule does not
directly impose any obligations on the Tribes and there are no
significant compliance costs associated with it. This rule only applies
to Tribal and non-Tribal entities that apply for and receive assistance
from EPA. When the recipient receives the EPA assistance, it accepts
the obligation to comply with EPA's Age Discrimination Act implementing
regulations. Compliance obligations are, therefore, voluntary and
contractual. No entity is required to apply for or accept EPA
assistance. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
EPA specifically solicits additional comment on this direct final rule
from Tribal officials.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health & Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885), ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' applies to any rule
that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined
under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health
or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the
potential to influence the regulation. This direct final rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an
environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not a ``significant energy action'' as defined in
Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001)) because it is not likely to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. EPA is taking
action to approve rules for implementing the Age Discrimination Act of
1975, as amended. The Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of age
in programs or activities receiving Federal assistance. Accordingly, we
have concluded that this rule is not likely to have any adverse energy
effects.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272n)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This direct
final rulemaking does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA
is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus standards. EPA
welcomes comments on this aspect of the direct final rulemaking and,
specifically, invites the public to identify potentially-applicable
voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such standards should
be used in this regulation.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. EPA is taking action to approve rules for implementing the
Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended. The Act prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving
Federal assistance. This rule does not adversely affect minority or
low-income populations therefore, we have concluded that this rule will
not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or low-income populations.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the
[[Page 31707]]
Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and other required information to
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the
Federal Register. A Major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after
it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be effective
October 4, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 7
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Age discrimination, Civil rights, Equal employment opportunity,
Individuals with disabilities, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sex discrimination.
Dated: May 27, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, 40 CFR part 7 is amended as
follows:
PART 7--NONDISCRIMINATION IN PROGRAMS OR ACTIVITIES RECEIVING
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
0
1. The authority citation for part 7 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d-7 and 6101 et seq.; 29
U.S.C. 794; 33 U.S.C. 1251nt.
0
2. Section 7.10 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 7.10 Purpose of this part.
This part implements: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
amended; section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the
Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; and section 13 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, Public Law 92-
500, (collectively, the Acts).
0
3. Section 7.25 is amended by adding the definitions for ``Action,''
``Age,'' ``Age distinction,'' ``Age-related term,'' ``Normal
operation,'' and ``Statutory objective'' in alphabetical order to read
as follows:
Sec. 7.25 Definitions.
* * * * *
Action, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means any act,
activity, policy, rule, standard, or method of administration; or the
use of any policy, rule, standard, or method of administration.
* * * * *
Age, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means how old a person
is, or the number of elapsed years from the date of a person's birth.
Age distinction, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means any
action using age or an age-related term.
Age-related term, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means a
word or words which necessarily imply a particular age or range of ages
(for example; ``children,'' ``adult,'' ``older persons,'' but not
``student'' or ``grade'').
* * * * *
Normal operation, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means the
operation of a program or activity without significant changes that
would impair its ability to meet its objectives.
* * * * *
Statutory objective, for purposes of subpart F of this part, means
any purpose of a program or activity expressly stated in any Federal
statute, State statute, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an
elected, general purpose legislative body.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 7.80(c)(1) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 7.80 Applicants.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Notice of any lawsuit pending against the applicant alleging
discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, age, handicap, or
national origin;
* * * * *
0
5. Section 7.85 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2), by
redesignating the introductory text of paragraph (c) after the heading
as paragraph (c)(1), and adding paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.85 Recipients.
(a) * * *
(2) Racial/ethnic, national origin, age, sex and handicap data, or
EPA Form 4700-4 information submitted with its application;
* * * * *
(c) Self-evaluation. (1) * * *
(2) Each recipient employing the equivalent of 15 or more full time
employees may be required to complete a written self-evaluation of its
compliance under the Age Discrimination Act as part of a compliance
review or complaint investigation. This self-evaluation will pertain to
any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving
Federal assistance from EPA. If required, each recipient's self-
evaluation shall identify and justify each age distinction imposed by
the recipient and each recipient shall take corrective and remedial
action whenever a self-evaluation indicates a violation of the Age
Discrimination Act.
* * * * *
0
6. The first sentence in Sec. 7.95(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 7.95 Notice of nondiscrimination.
* * * * *
(a) Requirements. A recipient shall provide initial and continuing
notice that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color,
national origin, age, or handicap in a program or activity receiving
EPA assistance or, in programs or activities covered by section 13, on
the basis of sex. * * *
* * * * *
0
7. The third sentence in Sec. 7.110(a) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 7.110 Preaward compliance.
* * * * *
(a) * * * When the OCR cannot make a determination on the basis of
this information, additional information will be requested from the
applicant, local government officials, or interested persons or
organizations, including aged and handicapped persons or organizations
representing such persons. * * *
* * * * *
0
8. Section 7.120 is amended by adding a new fifth sentence to paragraph
(a) and adding paragraph (d)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 7.120 Complaint investigations.
* * * * *
(a) Who may file a complaint. * * * Complaints of employment
discrimination based on age against an individual by recipients of
Federal financial assistance are subject to the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967 and should be filed administratively with the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (see 29 CFR part 1626). * * *
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Complaints alleging age discrimination under the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 will be referred to a mediation agency in
accordance with Sec. 7.180.
* * * * *
0
9. A new subpart F, consisting of Sec. Sec. 7.140 through 7.180, is
added to read as follows:
Subpart F--Discrimination Prohibited on the Basis of Age
Sec.
[[Page 31708]]
7.140 General prohibition.
7.145 Specific prohibitions.
7.150 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination--normal
operation or statutory objective of any program or activity.
7.155 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination--reasonable
factors other than age.
7.160 Burden of proof.
7.165 Special benefits for children and the elderly.
7.170 Alternative funds disbursal procedures.
7.175 Exhaustion of administrative remedy.
7.180 Mediation of age discrimination complaints.
Subpart F--Discrimination Prohibited on the Basis of Age
Sec. 7.140 General prohibition.
No person in the United States may, on the basis of age, be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be
subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving EPA
assistance.
Sec. 7.145 Specific prohibitions.
(a) As to any program or activity receiving EPA assistance, a
recipient shall not directly or through contractual, licensing, or
other arrangements on the basis of age:
(1) Exclude any individuals from, deny them the service, aid or
benefits of, or subject them to discrimination under, a program or
activity;
(2) Provide a person any service, aid or other benefit that is
different, or is provided differently from that provided to others
under the program or activity;
(3) Restrict a person in any way in the enjoyment of any advantage
or privilege enjoyed by others receiving any service, aid, or benefit
provided by the program or activity;
(4) Subject a person to segregation in any manner or separate
treatment in any way related to receiving services or benefits under
the program or activity;
(5) Deny a person or any group of persons the opportunity to
participate as members of any planning or advisory body which is an
integral part of the program or activity, such as a local sanitation
board or sewer authority;
(6) In administering a program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance in which the recipient has previously
discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take affirmative
action to provide remedies to those who have been injured by the
discrimination.
(b) A recipient shall not use criteria or methods of administering
its program or activity which have the effect of subjecting individuals
to discrimination because of their age, or have the effect of defeating
or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the
program or activity with respect to individuals of a particular age.
(c) A recipient shall not choose a site or location of a facility
that has the purpose or effect of excluding individuals from, denying
them the benefits of, or subjecting them to discrimination under any
program or activity to which this part applies on the ground of age; or
with the purpose or effect of defeating or substantially impairing the
accomplishment of the objectives of this subpart.
(d) The specific prohibitions of discrimination enumerated above do
not limit the general prohibition of Sec. 7.140.
Sec. 7.150 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination--normal
operation or statutory objective of any program or activity.
A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited by
Sec. Sec. 7.140 and 7.145, if the action reasonably takes into account
age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or achievement of any
statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably
takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or
the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity if:
(a) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other
characteristics;
(b) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in
order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue,
or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity;
(c) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or
approximated by the use of age; and
(d) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly
on an individual basis.
Sec. 7.155 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination--
reasonable factors other than age.
A recipient is permitted to take an action otherwise prohibited by
Sec. Sec. 7.140 and 7.145 which is based on a factor other than age,
even though that action may have a disproportionate effect on persons
of different ages. An action may be based on a factor other than age
only if the factor bears a direct and substantial relationship to the
normal operation of the program or activity or to the achievement of a
statutory objective.
Sec. 7.160 Burden of proof.
The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls
within the exceptions outlined in Sec. Sec. 7.150 and 7.155 is on the
recipient of EPA financial assistance.
Sec. 7.165 Special benefits for children and the elderly.
If a recipient operating a program which serves the elderly or
children in addition to persons of other ages, provides special
benefits to the elderly or to children the provision of those benefits
shall be presumed to be voluntary affirmative action provided that it
does not have the effect of excluding otherwise eligible persons from
participation in the program.
Sec. 7.170 Alternative funds disbursal procedures.
(a) When EPA withholds funds from a recipient under Subpart F of
these regulations, the Administrator may disburse the withheld funds
directly to an alternate recipient: Any public or non-profit private
organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
(b) The Administrator will require any alternate recipient to
demonstrate the ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute
authorizing the funds and these regulations (40 CFR Part 7).
Sec. 7.175 Exhaustion of administrative remedy.
(a) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion
of administrative remedies under the Age Discrimination Act.
Administrative remedies are exhausted if:
(1) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint
and EPA has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
(2) EPA issues any finding in favor of the recipient.
(b) If EPA fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a
finding in favor of the recipient, EPA shall:
(1) Promptly advise the complainant of this fact; and
(2) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil
action for injunctive relief; and
(3) Inform the complainant that:
(i) The complainant may bring a civil action only in a United
States district court for the district in which the recipient is found
or transacts business;
(ii) A complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be
awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees,
but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
(iii) Before commencing the action, the complainant shall give 30
days notice by registered mail to the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services, the Administrator,
[[Page 31709]]
the Attorney General of the United States, and the recipient;
(iv) The notice must state: The alleged violation of the Age
Discrimination Act; the relief requested; the court in which the
complainant is bringing the action; and, whether or not attorney's fees
are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
(v) The complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged
violation of the Age Discrimination Act by the same recipient is the
subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
Sec. 7.180 Mediation of age discrimination complaints.
(a) The OCR will refer all accepted complaints alleging age
discrimination to the Mediation Agency designated by the Secretary of
the Department of Health and Human Services.
(b) Both the complainant and the recipient must participate in the
mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or make
an informed judgment that an agreement is not possible. The recipient
and the complainant must meet with the mediator at least once before
the OCR will accept a judgment that an agreement is not possible. The
recipient and the complainant, however, need not meet with the mediator
at the same time.
(c) If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the
mediator must prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the
complainant and recipient sign it. The mediator will send a copy of the
agreement to the OCR, which will take no further action on the
complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with
the agreement.
(d) The mediator must protect the confidentiality of all
information obtained in the course of the mediation process. No
mediator may testify in any adjudicative proceeding, produce any
document, or otherwise disclose any information obtained in the course
of the mediation process without prior approval of the head of the
agency appointing the mediator.
(e) Mediation ends after sixty (60) days from the time EPA received
the complaint or if:
(1) An agreement is reached; or
(2) The Mediator determines that an agreement cannot be reached.
(f) The mediator must return unresolved complaints to OCR to be
processed in accordance with the procedure in Sec. 7.120.
[FR Doc. 2010-13470 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6650-50-P