Export Administration Regulations: Technical Corrections, 31678-31682 [2010-13243]
Download as PDF
31678
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321–
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On March 22, 2010, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to amend
Class E airspace for the Corpus Christi,
TX area, reconfiguring controlled
airspace at Aransas County Airport (75
FR 13453) Docket No. FAA–2010–0089.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received. Class E airspace
designations are published in paragraph
6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T signed
August 27, 2009, and effective
September 15, 2009, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
Part 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
amending Class E airspace for the
Corpus Christi, TX area. The addition of
new SIAPs at Aransas County Airport,
Rockford, TX has made this action is
necessary for the safety and
management of IFR operations at the
airport.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends
controlled airspace at Aransas County
Airport, Rockport, TX.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:
■
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
Part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed August 27, 2009, and effective
September 15, 2009 is amended as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
(Lat. 27°54′14″ N., long. 97°26′42″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.5 mile
radius of Corpus Christi International Airport
and within 1.4 miles each side of the 200°
radial of the Corpus Christi VORTAC
extending from the 7.5 mile radius to 8.5
miles north of the airport, and within 1.5
miles each side of the 316° bearing from the
airport extending from the 7.5 mile radius to
10.1 miles northwest of the airport, and
within an 8.8-mile radius of Corpus Christi
NAS/Truax Field, and within a 6.3-mile
radius of Mustang Beach Airport, and within
a 6.4-mile radius of T.P. McCampbell
Airport, and within a 6.3-mile radius of
Nueces County Airport, and within a 7.6mile radius of Aransas County Airport, and
within 2 miles each side of the 010° bearing
from the Aransas County Airport extending
from the 7.6 mile radius to 9.9 miles north
of the airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius
of San Jose Island Airport, and within 8 miles
west and 4 miles east of the 327° bearing
from the San Jose Island Airport extending
from the airport to 20 miles northwest of the
airport, and within 8 miles east and 4 miles
west of the 147° bearing from the airport
extending from the airport to 16 miles
southeast of the airport, excluding that
portion more than 12 miles from and parallel
to the shoreline.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 21,
2010.
Roger M. Trevino,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010–13262 Filed 6–3–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 734, 740, 744, 748, 750,
766 and 774
[Docket No. 0907271167–91198–01]
RIN 0694–AE69
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
Export Administration Regulations:
Technical Corrections
*
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final Rule.
*
*
*
*
ASW TX E5 Corpus Christi, TX [Amended]
Corpus Christi International Airport, TX
(Lat. 27°46′13″ N., long. 97°30′04″ W.)
Corpus Christi NAS/Truax Field, TX
(Lat. 27°41′34″ N., long. 97°17′25″ W.)
Port Aransas, Mustang Beach Airport, TX
(Lat. 27°48′43″ N., long. 97°05′20″ W.)
Rockport, San Jose Island Airport, TX
(Lat. 27°56′40″ N., long. 96°59′06″ W.)
Rockport, Aransas County Airport, TX
(Lat. 28°05′12″ N., long. 97°02′41″ W.)
Ingleside, T.P. McCampbell Airport, TX
(Lat. 27°54′47″ N., long. 97°12′41″ W.)
Robstown, Nueces County Airport, TX
(Lat. 27°46′43″ N., long. 97°41′26″ W.)
Corpus Christi VORTAC, TX
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: This rule clarifies language
concerning the de minimis provisions of
the Export Administration Regulations
and certain performance criteria of
turning machines. It also removes
obsolete cross references, removes and
reserves two regulatory provisions,
corrects a typographical error, and
removes an unnecessary reporting
requirement.
DATES:
This rule is effective June 4,
2010.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William H. Arvin, Regulatory Policy
Division, e-mail warvin@bis.doc.gov,
telephone 202 482 2440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Removal of Potentially Confusing
Language Regarding De Minimis
Content of Foreign Made Items
The Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) generally do not
apply to items that were made and are
located outside the United States, and
that contain only the ‘‘de minimis’’ level
of U.S. origin content as defined in
§ 734.4. The procedures and standards
for calculating whether an item exceeds
the de minimis threshold are contained
in Supplement No. 2 to Part 734 of the
EAR. Section 732.2(d), which directs
readers to that supplement, notes that
‘‘[t]his step [de minimis calculation] is
appropriate only for items that are made
outside the United States and are not
currently in the United States.’’ Pursuant
to § 734.3(a)(1), all items, regardless of
level of foreign content, are subject to
the EAR if they are physically located in
the United States. This rule removes
§ 734.3(b)(4), which delineates a
category of items not subject to the EAR
(‘‘foreign made items that have less than
the de minimis percentage of controlled
U.S. content based on the principles
described in § 734.3 of this part’’),
because the provision could be
erroneously read as applying the de
minimis exclusion to foreign made
items that are located in the United
States. BIS attempted to remove
§ 734.3(b)(4) in a previous rule. (See 73
FR 75942, December 15, 2008).
However, the drafting instruction in that
rule erroneously read, ‘‘In § 734.4,
remove paragraph (b)(4).’’ (Id.) Because
§ 734.4 does not contain a paragraph
(b)(4), that instruction had no effect.
This rule includes the correct drafting
instruction to remove § 734.3(b)(4).
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
Correction of Incorrect Paragraph
Designation
This rule redesignates
§ 740.11(d)(3)(C) of the EAR as
§ 740.11(d)(3)(iii), to conform to
standard Code of Federal Regulations
paragraph structure. The incorrect
designation was created in a rule
published at 75 FR 6301, February 9,
2010.
Transition to Web-Based System for
Information About the Status of Certain
Matters Pending With BIS
Since the mid-1980s, BIS has operated
a telephone-based automated system for
parties to obtain information on the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
status of license applications and
certain other matters that are under
review by BIS. This system is known as
the ‘‘System for Tracking Export License
Applications’’ or ‘‘STELA.’’ In 2008, BIS
began offering the same automated
service via a Web site (https://
snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela/). BIS plans to
phase out the telephone version of
STELA because it now has few users,
and maintaining such an old system is
increasingly difficult. Accordingly, this
rule updates references to STELA in
§§ 740.5(d)(2), 740.7(d)(4)(ii) and
740.18(c)(5) to the Web address,
removes references to the telephone
system from all three provisions, and
removes the telephone number
currently listed in § 740.18(c)(5). This
rule also removes and reserves § 750.5,
which provided detailed instructions on
how to use the telephone version of
STELA, as well as references to § 750.5
from §§ 740.5(d)(2) and 740.7(d)(4)(ii).
Removal of Obsolete Provision
Regarding Restrictions on Exports and
Reexports Involving Persons Named in
General Orders
From June 2006 until September
2008, Supplement No. 1 to part 736 of
the EAR contained ‘‘General Order
Number 3,’’ which imposed license
requirements on exports and reexports
of items subject to the EAR to certain
listed persons. That general order was
subsequently removed, and most of the
persons listed therein were added to the
Entity List in Supplement No. 4 to part
744 (73 FR 54503, Sept. 22, 2008). This
rule removes and reserves § 744.15,
which covered restrictions on exports
and reexports involving persons named
in general orders. With the removal of
General Order Number 3, no such
general orders exist; hence, § 744.15 no
longer serves a purpose. This rule also
removes the sentence in § 744.1(a)(1)
that referred to § 744.15.
Removal of Reference to Telephonic
Notification Regarding Personal
Identification Numbers (PIN)
In § 748.7(a)(2)(i), this rule removes
the word ‘‘telephonically’’ from the
sentence describing BIS’s notification to
individual users of the electronic filing
system of their PINs because BIS now
uses a variety of methods for providing
such notifications.
Removal of Cross References to EAR
paragraph That No Longer Exists
The rule replaces references to
§ 748.2(c) of the EAR, which formerly
contained BIS address information but
no longer exists, with references to a
current provision that contains
appropriate current address
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31679
information. Specifically, this rule
replaces the reference to § 748.2(c) that
appears in §§ 748.7(a)(1),
748.7(a)(2)(iv)(A) and 748.9(i)(1) with a
reference to § 748.1(d)(2), which
provides BIS’s general mailing address.
The rule also replaces the reference to
§ 748.2(c) in § 748.13(c)(2) with the full
address of the specific BIS office
currently handling the relevant
documentation.
Removal of Unnecessary Notification
Requirement
Under certain circumstances, BIS may
request a delivery verification of items
licensed for export. Such verifications
are conducted by the government of the
importing country. Generally, BIS
would require, as a license condition,
that the exporter obtain the foreign
government-issued certificate of
delivery verification and send the
certificate to BIS. Amended § 748.13(b)
provides that if the national security
export control is removed from the item
that is the subject of a license that is
issued, the requirement to obtain the
delivery verification is removed as well.
Prior to publication of this rule,
§ 748.13(b) required the licensee to
inform BIS in writing that it would not
obtain the delivery verification
certificate in situations where the
national security license requirement
had been removed. Because the national
security license requirements referred to
are those imposed by the EAR, BIS
would be aware of their removal
regardless, and therefore would not
need written notice from the licensee on
this subject.
Replacement of Obsolete Terminology
This rule replaces the term ‘‘Export
Management System Guidelines’’ that
appears in Supplement No.1 to Part 766
with the term ‘‘Export Management
Compliance Program Guidelines,’’ and
replaces the term ‘‘EMS Guidelines’’
with ‘‘EMCP Guidelines’’ to reflect the
terminology that BIS currently uses to
describe its compliance guidance.
Clarifying Language Regarding Certain
Machine Tools Subject to Nuclear
Proliferation Export Controls
Export Control Classification Number
(ECCN) 2B001 applies, inter alia, to
numerically controlled machine tools
for turning that have both a positioning
accuracy better than 6 μm along any
linear axis, and two or more axes that
can be controlled simultaneously for
contouring control. Consistent with the
Nuclear Suppliers Group’s guidelines,
the EAR’s ECCN entry reflects the fact
that the United States does not apply
nuclear proliferation export license
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31680
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
requirements and licensing policy to
machines meeting those parameters if
the machine is not capable of machining
diameters exceeding 35 mm. Prior to
publication of this rule, ECCN 2B001
stated that the nuclear proliferation
reason for control (NP) does not apply
to ‘‘turning machines under 2B001.a
with a capacity equal to or less than 35
mm diameter.’’ BIS believes that this
language was consistent with the
meaning of the term ‘‘capacity’’ that is
widely used in the machine tool
industry, i.e., indicating a limit or a
maximum amount with no extension of
this capability. In addition, because the
difficulty of maintaining a given
positioning accuracy increases as the
maximum diameter that the tool is
capable of machining increases, it
would make sense for BIS to apply a
more stringent control to machines
capable of maintaining the 6 μm
positioning accuracy when machining
larger parts than it would apply to
machines that were capable of
maintaining that level of accuracy only
when machining smaller parts.
Nevertheless, some parties have
indicated that they find the language set
forth in ECCN 2B001 confusing.
Therefore, BIS is revising the entry to
state that the NP reason for control does
not apply to ‘‘turning machines under
2B001.a with a capacity no greater than
35 mm diameter.’’
Correcting a Typographical Error
Regarding Calculating the ‘‘Adjusted
Peak Performance’’ of Digital Computers
The EAR employ a concept called
‘‘adjusted peak performance’’ (APP) for
setting performance benchmarks that
determine the classification of a digital
computer on the Commerce Control List
(CCL). A note entitled ‘‘Technical Note
on ‘Adjusted Peak Performance’ (‘APP’)’’
at the end of Category 4 on the CCL
explains how to calculate APP. BIS’s
intent is that this note match the note
of the same name that appears at the
end of Category 4 of the List of Dual-Use
Goods and Technology published by the
Wassenaar Arrangement on Export
Controls for Conventional Arms and
Dual Use Goods and Technologies (WA
list note). However, prior to the
publication of this rule, in describing
how APP is expressed, the CCL’s
Category 4 note erroneously used the
number ‘‘1012’’ instead of the correct
number, ‘‘1012,’’ that appears in the WA
List note. This rule corrects that error.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule is not a significant rule for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with a collection of information, subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
Control Number. This rule involves a
collection of information that has been
approved by the OMB under control
number 0694–0088, which carries a
burden hour estimate of 58 minutes to
prepare and submit form BIS–748.
Miscellaneous and recordkeeping
activities account for 12 minutes per
submission. BIS believes that this rule
will make no change to the number of
submissions or to the burden imposed
by this collection.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined in Executive Order
13132.
4. BIS finds that there is good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive the
provisions of the Administrative
Procedure Act requiring prior notice
and the opportunity for public comment
because these revisions are
administrative in nature and do not
affect the rights and obligations of the
public; therefore allowing prior notice
and comment on these rules is
unnecessary. In addition, the 30-day
delay in effectiveness required by 5
U.S.C. 553(d) is not applicable here
because this rule is not a substantive
rule, but merely makes technical
changes to the regulations. No other law
requires that notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule;
therefore, the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.) are not applicable.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 734
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Inventions and
patents, Research.
15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 766
Administrative practice and
procedure, Confidential business
information, Exports, Law enforcement,
Penalties.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ Accordingly, the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
Parts 730–774) are amended as follows:
PART 734—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 734
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099,
3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13020, 61
FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009); Notice of
November 6, 2009, 74 FR 58187 (November
10, 2009).
§ 734.3
[Amended]
2. Section 734.3 is amended by
removing paragraph (b)(4).
■
PART 740—[AMENDED]
3. The authority citation for part 740
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
4. Section 740.5 is amended by
revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as
follows:
■
§ 740.5
Civil end-users (CIV).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Confirmation of eligibility. You
may not use License Exception CIV for
a deemed export until you have
obtained confirmation of eligibility by
checking the System for Tracking Export
License Applications (https://
snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela) or through the
Simplified Network Application
Procedure (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Section 740.7 is amended by
revising paragraph (d)(4)(ii) to read as
follows:
§ 740.7
Computers (APP).
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Confirmation of eligibility. You
may not use License Exception APP,
until you have obtained confirmation of
eligibility via either BIS’s System for
Tracking Export License Applications
(STELA) (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov/
stela) from BIS’s Simplified Network
Application Procedure (SNAP). See
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
https://www.bis.doc.gov/SNAP/
index.htm for more information about
SNAP.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 744.15 [Removed]
10. Section 744.15 is removed and
reserved.
■
PART 748—[AMENDED]
§ 740.11 [Amended]
11. The authority citation for part 748
continues to read as follows:
■
6. Section 740.11 is amended by
redesignating paragraph (d)(3)(C) as
paragraph (d)(3)(iii).
■ 7. Section 740.18 is amended by
revising paragraph (c)(5) to read as
follows:
■
§ 740.18
Agricultural commodities (AGR).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(5) Status of pending AGR notification
requests. You must contact BIS’s System
for Tracking Export License
Applications (STELA) (https://
snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela) for status of
your pending AGR notification or verify
the status in BIS’s Simplified Network
Applications Processing Redesign
(SNAP–R) System. STELA will provide
the date of registration of the AGR
notification. If no department or agency
objection is raised within 11 business
days, STELA will, on the twelfth
business day following the date of
registration, provide you with
confirmation of that fact. You may not
proceed with your shipment unless you
confirm with either STELA or SNAP–R
that no objection has been raised. If an
objection is raised, STELA and SNAP–
R will indicate that a license is required.
The AGR notification will then be
processed as a license application. In
addition, BIS may provide notice of an
objection by telephone, fax, courier
service, or other means.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 744—[AMENDED]
8. The authority citation for part 744
continues to read as follows:
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14,
2009).
12. Section 748.7 is amended by
revising the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(1), the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(2)(i) and the second
sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(iv)(A) to
read as follows:
■
§ 748.7 Applying electronically for a
license or classification request.
(a) * * *
(1) * * * Written requests may be
faxed to (202) 219–9179 or (202) 219–
9182 (Washington, DC), faxed to (949)
660–9347 (Newport Beach, CA), or
submitted to the address identified in
§ 748.1(d)(2) of this part. Both the
envelope and letter must be marked
‘‘Attn: Electronic Submission Request.’’
* * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * * Each person approved by
BIS to submit applications
electronically for the company will be
assigned a personal identification
number (‘‘PIN’’) by BIS. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) * * *
(A) * * * You must confirm this
notification in writing within two
business days to BIS at the address
provided in § 748.1(d)(2) of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Section 748.9 is amended by
revising paragraph (i)(1) to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181,
3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p.
356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O.
13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
786; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325
(August 14, 2009); Notice of November 6,
2009, 74 FR 58187 (November 10, 2009).
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(1) The applicant must send a letter
request for return of an Import or EndUser Certificate to the address stated in
§ 748.1(d)(2) of this part, ‘‘Attn:
Import/End-User Certificate Request’’.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Section 748.13 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) and the last
sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 744.1 [Amended]
§ 748.13
9. Section 744.1 is amended by
removing the fourteenth sentence from
paragraph (a)(1).
*
■
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
§ 748.9 Support documents for license
applications.
*
Delivery verification (DV).
*
*
*
*
(b) Exception to obtaining Delivery
Verification. The DV requirement for a
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
31681
particular transaction does not apply if
the item is no longer controlled for
national security reasons following the
issuance of a license.
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Once all shipments against
the license have been made (or the
licensee has determined that none will
be), the licensee must forward, in one
package, all applicable DVs to Office of
Exporter Services, Export Management
and Compliance Division, Room 2705,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 750—[AMENDED]
15. The authority citation for part 750
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108–
11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783;
Presidential Determination 2003–23 of May
7, 2003, 68 FR 26459, May 16, 2003; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14,
2009).
§ 750.5 [Removed]
16. Section 750.5 is removed and
reserved.
■
PART 766—[AMENDED]
17. The authority citation for part 766
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
18. Supplement No. 1 to Part 766 is
amended by revising the second and
third sentences of paragraph number ‘‘2’’
that appears under the unnumbered
italicized header ‘‘Mitigating Factors’’
that appears under the header ‘‘III How
BIS Determines What Sanctions Are
Appropriate in a Settlement’’ to read as
follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 766—Guidance on
Charging and Penalty Determinations in
Settlement of Administrative Enforcement
Cases
*
*
*
*
*
III. How BIS Determines What Sanctions Are
Appropriate in a Settlement
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Mitigating Factors
*
*
*
(2) * * * In determining the presence of
this factor, BIS will take account of the extent
to which a party complies with the principles
set forth in BIS’s Export Management
Compliance Program (EMCP) Guidelines.
Information about the EMCP Guidelines can
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
31682
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 107 / Friday, June 4, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
be accessed through the BIS Web site at
www.bis.doc.gov.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 774—[AMENDED]
19. The authority citation for part 774
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq., 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 46 U.S.C. app. 466c; 50 U.S.C. app. 5;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009 (74
Fed. Reg. 41,325 (August 14, 2009)).
20. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774,
Category 2, Export Control Classification
Number 2B001, revise the ‘‘Controls’’
paragraph of the ‘‘License
Requirements’’ section to read as
follows:
■
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774—The
Commerce Control List
*
*
*
*
*
2B001 Machine tools and any combination
thereof, for removing (or cutting) metals,
ceramics or ‘‘composites’’, which, according
to the manufacturer’s technical
specifications, can be equipped with
electronic devices for ‘‘numerical control’’;
and specially designed components as
follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, NP, AT
Control(s)
Country chart
NS applies to entire entry .................................................................................................................................................................
NP applies to 2B001.a, .b, .c, and .d, EXCEPT: (1) turning machines under 2B001.a with a capacity no greater than 35 mm
diameter; (2) bar machines (Swissturn), limited to machining only bar feed through, if maximum bar diameter is equal to or
less than 42 mm and there is no capability of mounting chucks. (Machines may have drilling and/or milling capabilities for
machining parts with diameters less than 42 mm); or (3) milling machines under 2B001.b.with x-axis travel greater than two
meters and overall ‘‘positioning accuracy’’ on the x-axis more (worse) than 0.030 mm..
AT applies to entire entry .................................................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
21. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774,
Category 4, the Technical Note on
‘‘Adjusted Peak Performance’’ (‘‘APP’’)
that appears at the end of Category 4,
revise the definition of ‘‘APP’’ that
appears under the heading
‘‘Abbreviations Used in This Technical
Note’’ to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
Category 4—Computers
*
*
*
*
*
Technical Note on ‘‘Adjusted Peak
Performance’’ (‘‘APP’’)
*
*
*
*
*
Abbreviations Used in This Technical Note
*
*
*
*
*
APP is expressed in Weighted TeraFLOPS
(WT) in units of 1012 adjusted floating point
operations per second.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010–13243 Filed 6–3–10; 8:45 am]
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:03 Jun 03, 2010
Jkt 220001
RIN 3084-AA99
Disclosures for Non-Federally Insured
Depository Institutions Under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act (FDICIA)
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission
(FTC or Commission).
ACTION: Final rule.
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774—The
Commerce Control List
*
16 CFR Part 320
SUMMARY: The Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
of 1991 (FDICIA) directs the
Commission to prescribe the manner
and content of certain mandatory
disclosures for depository institutions
that lack federal deposit insurance. On
March 13, 2009, the Commission
published a supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking seeking comment
on disclosure rules for such institutions.
After reviewing comments received in
response, the Commission now
publishes a final rule.
DATES: This final rule will become
effective on July 6, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Copies of this document are
available from: Public Reference Branch,
Room 130, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC 20580. The complete
record of this proceeding is also
available at that address. Relevant
portions of the proceeding, including
this document, are available at (https://
www.ftc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hampton Newsome, (202) 326-2889,
Attorney, Division of Enforcement,
Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
NS Column 1.
NP Column 1.
AT Column 1.
Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
In 1991, as part of the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
(FDICIA), Congress directed the
Commission to prescribe certain
disclosures for depository institutions
lacking federal deposit insurance.
Congress then prohibited the FTC from
spending resources on FDICIA’s
disclosure requirements until 2003.
After Congress lifted that ban, the
Commission published proposed
disclosures consistent with FDICIA’s
statutory directives (70 FR 12823
(March 16, 2005)). Many commenters
raised concerns with the proposal.1
Thereafter, Congress passed the
Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act
of 2006 (FSRRA) (Pub. L. 109-351)
amending FDICIA. The FSRRA
amendments addressed almost all of the
concerns raised by commenters about
the FTC’s proposed rule. The
Commission published a supplemental
notice on March 13, 2009 (74 FR 10843)
seeking comments on a proposal
consistent with the FSRRA
amendments. The Commission has
reviewed the comments received in
response and now publishes a final rule.
II. Background
Under existing law, all federally
chartered and most state-chartered
depository institutions must have
federal deposit insurance. Federal
deposit insurance funds currently
guarantee all deposits at federally
1 See (https://www.ftc.gov/os/comments/FDICIA/
index.shtm).
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 107 (Friday, June 4, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31678-31682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-13243]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 734, 740, 744, 748, 750, 766 and 774
[Docket No. 0907271167-91198-01]
RIN 0694-AE69
Export Administration Regulations: Technical Corrections
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule clarifies language concerning the de minimis
provisions of the Export Administration Regulations and certain
performance criteria of turning machines. It also removes obsolete
cross references, removes and reserves two regulatory provisions,
corrects a typographical error, and removes an unnecessary reporting
requirement.
DATES: This rule is effective June 4, 2010.
[[Page 31679]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William H. Arvin, Regulatory Policy
Division, e-mail warvin@bis.doc.gov, telephone 202 482 2440.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Removal of Potentially Confusing Language Regarding De Minimis Content
of Foreign Made Items
The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) generally do not apply
to items that were made and are located outside the United States, and
that contain only the ``de minimis'' level of U.S. origin content as
defined in Sec. 734.4. The procedures and standards for calculating
whether an item exceeds the de minimis threshold are contained in
Supplement No. 2 to Part 734 of the EAR. Section 732.2(d), which
directs readers to that supplement, notes that ``[t]his step [de
minimis calculation] is appropriate only for items that are made
outside the United States and are not currently in the United States.''
Pursuant to Sec. 734.3(a)(1), all items, regardless of level of
foreign content, are subject to the EAR if they are physically located
in the United States. This rule removes Sec. 734.3(b)(4), which
delineates a category of items not subject to the EAR (``foreign made
items that have less than the de minimis percentage of controlled U.S.
content based on the principles described in Sec. 734.3 of this
part''), because the provision could be erroneously read as applying
the de minimis exclusion to foreign made items that are located in the
United States. BIS attempted to remove Sec. 734.3(b)(4) in a previous
rule. (See 73 FR 75942, December 15, 2008). However, the drafting
instruction in that rule erroneously read, ``In Sec. 734.4, remove
paragraph (b)(4).'' (Id.) Because Sec. 734.4 does not contain a
paragraph (b)(4), that instruction had no effect. This rule includes
the correct drafting instruction to remove Sec. 734.3(b)(4).
Correction of Incorrect Paragraph Designation
This rule redesignates Sec. 740.11(d)(3)(C) of the EAR as Sec.
740.11(d)(3)(iii), to conform to standard Code of Federal Regulations
paragraph structure. The incorrect designation was created in a rule
published at 75 FR 6301, February 9, 2010.
Transition to Web-Based System for Information About the Status of
Certain Matters Pending With BIS
Since the mid-1980s, BIS has operated a telephone-based automated
system for parties to obtain information on the status of license
applications and certain other matters that are under review by BIS.
This system is known as the ``System for Tracking Export License
Applications'' or ``STELA.'' In 2008, BIS began offering the same
automated service via a Web site (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela/).
BIS plans to phase out the telephone version of STELA because it now
has few users, and maintaining such an old system is increasingly
difficult. Accordingly, this rule updates references to STELA in
Sec. Sec. 740.5(d)(2), 740.7(d)(4)(ii) and 740.18(c)(5) to the Web
address, removes references to the telephone system from all three
provisions, and removes the telephone number currently listed in Sec.
740.18(c)(5). This rule also removes and reserves Sec. 750.5, which
provided detailed instructions on how to use the telephone version of
STELA, as well as references to Sec. 750.5 from Sec. Sec. 740.5(d)(2)
and 740.7(d)(4)(ii).
Removal of Obsolete Provision Regarding Restrictions on Exports and
Reexports Involving Persons Named in General Orders
From June 2006 until September 2008, Supplement No. 1 to part 736
of the EAR contained ``General Order Number 3,'' which imposed license
requirements on exports and reexports of items subject to the EAR to
certain listed persons. That general order was subsequently removed,
and most of the persons listed therein were added to the Entity List in
Supplement No. 4 to part 744 (73 FR 54503, Sept. 22, 2008). This rule
removes and reserves Sec. 744.15, which covered restrictions on
exports and reexports involving persons named in general orders. With
the removal of General Order Number 3, no such general orders exist;
hence, Sec. 744.15 no longer serves a purpose. This rule also removes
the sentence in Sec. 744.1(a)(1) that referred to Sec. 744.15.
Removal of Reference to Telephonic Notification Regarding Personal
Identification Numbers (PIN)
In Sec. 748.7(a)(2)(i), this rule removes the word
``telephonically'' from the sentence describing BIS's notification to
individual users of the electronic filing system of their PINs because
BIS now uses a variety of methods for providing such notifications.
Removal of Cross References to EAR paragraph That No Longer Exists
The rule replaces references to Sec. 748.2(c) of the EAR, which
formerly contained BIS address information but no longer exists, with
references to a current provision that contains appropriate current
address information. Specifically, this rule replaces the reference to
Sec. 748.2(c) that appears in Sec. Sec. 748.7(a)(1),
748.7(a)(2)(iv)(A) and 748.9(i)(1) with a reference to Sec.
748.1(d)(2), which provides BIS's general mailing address. The rule
also replaces the reference to Sec. 748.2(c) in Sec. 748.13(c)(2)
with the full address of the specific BIS office currently handling the
relevant documentation.
Removal of Unnecessary Notification Requirement
Under certain circumstances, BIS may request a delivery
verification of items licensed for export. Such verifications are
conducted by the government of the importing country. Generally, BIS
would require, as a license condition, that the exporter obtain the
foreign government-issued certificate of delivery verification and send
the certificate to BIS. Amended Sec. 748.13(b) provides that if the
national security export control is removed from the item that is the
subject of a license that is issued, the requirement to obtain the
delivery verification is removed as well. Prior to publication of this
rule, Sec. 748.13(b) required the licensee to inform BIS in writing
that it would not obtain the delivery verification certificate in
situations where the national security license requirement had been
removed. Because the national security license requirements referred to
are those imposed by the EAR, BIS would be aware of their removal
regardless, and therefore would not need written notice from the
licensee on this subject.
Replacement of Obsolete Terminology
This rule replaces the term ``Export Management System Guidelines''
that appears in Supplement No.1 to Part 766 with the term ``Export
Management Compliance Program Guidelines,'' and replaces the term ``EMS
Guidelines'' with ``EMCP Guidelines'' to reflect the terminology that
BIS currently uses to describe its compliance guidance.
Clarifying Language Regarding Certain Machine Tools Subject to Nuclear
Proliferation Export Controls
Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) 2B001 applies, inter
alia, to numerically controlled machine tools for turning that have
both a positioning accuracy better than 6 [mu]m along any linear axis,
and two or more axes that can be controlled simultaneously for
contouring control. Consistent with the Nuclear Suppliers Group's
guidelines, the EAR's ECCN entry reflects the fact that the United
States does not apply nuclear proliferation export license
[[Page 31680]]
requirements and licensing policy to machines meeting those parameters
if the machine is not capable of machining diameters exceeding 35 mm.
Prior to publication of this rule, ECCN 2B001 stated that the nuclear
proliferation reason for control (NP) does not apply to ``turning
machines under 2B001.a with a capacity equal to or less than 35 mm
diameter.'' BIS believes that this language was consistent with the
meaning of the term ``capacity'' that is widely used in the machine
tool industry, i.e., indicating a limit or a maximum amount with no
extension of this capability. In addition, because the difficulty of
maintaining a given positioning accuracy increases as the maximum
diameter that the tool is capable of machining increases, it would make
sense for BIS to apply a more stringent control to machines capable of
maintaining the 6 [mu]m positioning accuracy when machining larger
parts than it would apply to machines that were capable of maintaining
that level of accuracy only when machining smaller parts. Nevertheless,
some parties have indicated that they find the language set forth in
ECCN 2B001 confusing. Therefore, BIS is revising the entry to state
that the NP reason for control does not apply to ``turning machines
under 2B001.a with a capacity no greater than 35 mm diameter.''
Correcting a Typographical Error Regarding Calculating the ``Adjusted
Peak Performance'' of Digital Computers
The EAR employ a concept called ``adjusted peak performance'' (APP)
for setting performance benchmarks that determine the classification of
a digital computer on the Commerce Control List (CCL). A note entitled
``Technical Note on `Adjusted Peak Performance' (`APP')'' at the end of
Category 4 on the CCL explains how to calculate APP. BIS's intent is
that this note match the note of the same name that appears at the end
of Category 4 of the List of Dual-Use Goods and Technology published by
the Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and
Dual Use Goods and Technologies (WA list note). However, prior to the
publication of this rule, in describing how APP is expressed, the CCL's
Category 4 note erroneously used the number ``1012'' instead
of the correct number, ``1012,'' that appears in the WA List
note. This rule corrects that error.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule is not a significant rule for purposes of Executive
Order 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with a collection of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
Control Number. This rule involves a collection of information that has
been approved by the OMB under control number 0694-0088, which carries
a burden hour estimate of 58 minutes to prepare and submit form BIS-
748. Miscellaneous and recordkeeping activities account for 12 minutes
per submission. BIS believes that this rule will make no change to the
number of submissions or to the burden imposed by this collection.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined in Executive Order 13132.
4. BIS finds that there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
to waive the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring
prior notice and the opportunity for public comment because these
revisions are administrative in nature and do not affect the rights and
obligations of the public; therefore allowing prior notice and comment
on these rules is unnecessary. In addition, the 30-day delay in
effectiveness required by 5 U.S.C. 553(d) is not applicable here
because this rule is not a substantive rule, but merely makes technical
changes to the regulations. No other law requires that notice of
proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for
this rule; therefore, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 734
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Inventions and
patents, Research.
15 CFR Parts 740, 748 and 750
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 766
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Exports, Law enforcement, Penalties.
15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-
774) are amended as follows:
PART 734--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 734 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13020, 61
FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR,
1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009);
Notice of November 6, 2009, 74 FR 58187 (November 10, 2009).
Sec. 734.3 [Amended]
0
2. Section 734.3 is amended by removing paragraph (b)(4).
PART 740--[AMENDED]
0
3. The authority citation for part 740 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp.,
p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
0
4. Section 740.5 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 740.5 Civil end-users (CIV).
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Confirmation of eligibility. You may not use License Exception
CIV for a deemed export until you have obtained confirmation of
eligibility by checking the System for Tracking Export License
Applications (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela) or through the
Simplified Network Application Procedure (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov).
* * * * *
0
5. Section 740.7 is amended by revising paragraph (d)(4)(ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 740.7 Computers (APP).
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Confirmation of eligibility. You may not use License Exception
APP, until you have obtained confirmation of eligibility via either
BIS's System for Tracking Export License Applications (STELA) (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela) from BIS's Simplified Network Application
Procedure (SNAP). See
[[Page 31681]]
https://www.bis.doc.gov/SNAP/index.htm for more information about SNAP.
* * * * *
Sec. 740.11 [Amended]
0
6. Section 740.11 is amended by redesignating paragraph (d)(3)(C) as
paragraph (d)(3)(iii).
0
7. Section 740.18 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 740.18 Agricultural commodities (AGR).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(5) Status of pending AGR notification requests. You must contact
BIS's System for Tracking Export License Applications (STELA) (https://snapr.bis.doc.gov/stela) for status of your pending AGR notification or
verify the status in BIS's Simplified Network Applications Processing
Redesign (SNAP-R) System. STELA will provide the date of registration
of the AGR notification. If no department or agency objection is raised
within 11 business days, STELA will, on the twelfth business day
following the date of registration, provide you with confirmation of
that fact. You may not proceed with your shipment unless you confirm
with either STELA or SNAP-R that no objection has been raised. If an
objection is raised, STELA and SNAP-R will indicate that a license is
required. The AGR notification will then be processed as a license
application. In addition, BIS may provide notice of an objection by
telephone, fax, courier service, or other means.
* * * * *
PART 744--[AMENDED]
0
8. The authority citation for part 744 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22
U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179;
E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12938, 59
FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325
(August 14, 2009); Notice of November 6, 2009, 74 FR 58187 (November
10, 2009).
Sec. 744.1 [Amended]
0
9. Section 744.1 is amended by removing the fourteenth sentence from
paragraph (a)(1).
Sec. 744.15 [Removed]
0
10. Section 744.15 is removed and reserved.
PART 748--[AMENDED]
0
11. The authority citation for part 748 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74
FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
0
12. Section 748.7 is amended by revising the second sentence of
paragraph (a)(1), the second sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(i) and the
second sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(iv)(A) to read as follows:
Sec. 748.7 Applying electronically for a license or classification
request.
(a) * * *
(1) * * * Written requests may be faxed to (202) 219-9179 or (202)
219-9182 (Washington, DC), faxed to (949) 660-9347 (Newport Beach, CA),
or submitted to the address identified in Sec. 748.1(d)(2) of this
part. Both the envelope and letter must be marked ``Attn: Electronic
Submission Request.'' * * *
(2) * * *
(i) * * * Each person approved by BIS to submit applications
electronically for the company will be assigned a personal
identification number (``PIN'') by BIS. * * *
* * * * *
(iv) * * *
(A) * * * You must confirm this notification in writing within two
business days to BIS at the address provided in Sec. 748.1(d)(2) of
this part.
* * * * *
0
13. Section 748.9 is amended by revising paragraph (i)(1) to read as
follows:
Sec. 748.9 Support documents for license applications.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(1) The applicant must send a letter request for return of an
Import or End-User Certificate to the address stated in Sec.
748.1(d)(2) of this part, ``Attn: Import/End-User Certificate
Request''.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 748.13 is amended by revising paragraph (b) and the last
sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 748.13 Delivery verification (DV).
* * * * *
(b) Exception to obtaining Delivery Verification. The DV
requirement for a particular transaction does not apply if the item is
no longer controlled for national security reasons following the
issuance of a license.
(c) * * *
(2) * * * Once all shipments against the license have been made (or
the licensee has determined that none will be), the licensee must
forward, in one package, all applicable DVs to Office of Exporter
Services, Export Management and Compliance Division, Room 2705, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230.
* * * * *
PART 750--[AMENDED]
0
15. The authority citation for part 750 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117 Stat. 559; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; Presidential Determination 2003-23 of May 7, 2003, 68 FR
26459, May 16, 2003; Notice of August 13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August
14, 2009).
Sec. 750.5 [Removed]
0
16. Section 750.5 is removed and reserved.
PART 766--[AMENDED]
0
17. The authority citation for part 766 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
13, 2009, 74 FR 41325 (August 14, 2009).
0
18. Supplement No. 1 to Part 766 is amended by revising the second and
third sentences of paragraph number ``2'' that appears under the
unnumbered italicized header ``Mitigating Factors'' that appears under
the header ``III How BIS Determines What Sanctions Are Appropriate in a
Settlement'' to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 766--Guidance on Charging and Penalty
Determinations in Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Cases
* * * * *
III. How BIS Determines What Sanctions Are Appropriate in a Settlement
* * * * *
Mitigating Factors
* * * * *
(2) * * * In determining the presence of this factor, BIS will
take account of the extent to which a party complies with the
principles set forth in BIS's Export Management Compliance Program
(EMCP) Guidelines. Information about the EMCP Guidelines can
[[Page 31682]]
be accessed through the BIS Web site at www.bis.doc.gov.
* * * * *
PART 774--[AMENDED]
0
19. The authority citation for part 774 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq., 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 46 U.S.C. app. 466c; 50 U.S.C. app. 5;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; Notice of August 13, 2009 (74 Fed. Reg. 41,325 (August 14,
2009)).
0
20. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 2, Export Control
Classification Number 2B001, revise the ``Controls'' paragraph of the
``License Requirements'' section to read as follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List
* * * * *
2B001 Machine tools and any combination thereof, for removing (or
cutting) metals, ceramics or ``composites'', which, according to the
manufacturer's technical specifications, can be equipped with
electronic devices for ``numerical control''; and specially designed
components as follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
Reason for Control: NS, NP, AT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control(s) Country chart
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NS applies to entire entry................... NS Column 1.
NP applies to 2B001.a, .b, .c, and .d, NP Column 1.
EXCEPT: (1) turning machines under 2B001.a
with a capacity no greater than 35 mm
diameter; (2) bar machines (Swissturn),
limited to machining only bar feed through,
if maximum bar diameter is equal to or less
than 42 mm and there is no capability of
mounting chucks. (Machines may have drilling
and/or milling capabilities for machining
parts with diameters less than 42 mm); or
(3) milling machines under 2B001.b.with x-
axis travel greater than two meters and
overall ``positioning accuracy'' on the x-
axis more (worse) than 0.030 mm..
AT applies to entire entry................... AT Column 1.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
21. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 4, the Technical Note on
``Adjusted Peak Performance'' (``APP'') that appears at the end of
Category 4, revise the definition of ``APP'' that appears under the
heading ``Abbreviations Used in This Technical Note'' to read as
follows:
Supplement No. 1 to Part 774--The Commerce Control List
* * * * *
Category 4--Computers
* * * * *
Technical Note on ``Adjusted Peak Performance'' (``APP'')
* * * * *
Abbreviations Used in This Technical Note
* * * * *
APP is expressed in Weighted TeraFLOPS (WT) in units of 10\12\
adjusted floating point operations per second.
* * * * *
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-13243 Filed 6-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P