Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems, 30309-30310 [2010-12883]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
determination regarding the need for
restrictions.
(c) Evaluation of disruptive behavior.
In making determinations under
paragraph (b) of this section, the Chief
of Staff or designee must consider all
pertinent facts, including any prior
counseling of the patient regarding his
or her disruptive behavior or any
pattern of such behavior, and whether
the disruptive behavior is a result of the
patient’s individual fears, preferences,
or perceived needs. A patient’s
disruptive behavior must be assessed in
connection with VA’s duty to provide
good quality care, including care
designed to reduce or otherwise
clinically address the patient’s behavior.
(d) Restrictions. The restrictions on
care imposed under this section may
include but are not limited to:
(1) Specifying the hours in which
nonemergent outpatient care will be
provided;
(2) Arranging for medical and any
other services to be provided in a
particular patient care area (e.g., private
exam room near an exit);
(3) Arranging for medical and any
other services to be provided at a
specific site of care;
(4) Specifying the health care
provider, and related personnel, who
will be involved with the patient’s care;
(5) Requiring police escort; or
(6) Authorizing VA providers to
terminate an encounter immediately if
certain behaviors occur.
(e) Review of restrictions. The patient
may request the Network Director’s
review of any order issued under this
section within 30 days of the effective
date of the order by submitting a written
request to the Chief of Staff. The Chief
of Staff shall forward the order and the
patient’s request to the Network Director
for a final decision. The Network
Director shall issue a final decision on
this matter within 30 days. VA will
enforce the order while it is under
review by the network director. The
Chief of Staff will provide the patient
who made the request written notice of
the Network Director’s final decision.
Note: Although VA may restrict the time,
place, and/or manner of care under this
section, VA will continue to offer the full
range of needed medical care to which a
patient is eligible under title 38 of the United
States Code or Code of Federal Regulations.
Patients have the right to accept or refuse
treatments or procedures, and such refusal by
a patient is not a basis for restricting the
provision of care under this section.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 901, 1721)
[FR Doc. 2010–13048 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Revisions to the Requirements for
Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this proposed rule, the
Postal Service proposes to amend
regulations on Authorization to
Manufacture and Distribute Postage
Evidencing Systems. This proposed
revision clarifies the requirement for
examination by an independent audit
firm of a Postage Evidencing System
Provider’s Computerized Meter
Resetting System (CMRS) or PC
Postage® system internal controls.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 1, 2010.
Mail or deliver written
comments to the Manager, Postage
Technology Management, U.S. Postal
Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite
4200 NB, Washington, DC 20260–4200.
Copies of all written comments will be
available for inspection and
photocopying between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, at the
Postage Technology Management office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marlo Kay Ivey, Marketing Specialist,
Postage Technology Management, U.S.
Postal Service, at 202–268–7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postage
Evidencing Systems are devices or
systems of components that a customer
uses to print evidence that the prepaid
postage required for mailing has been
paid. They include, but are not limited
to, postage meters and PC Postage
systems. The Postal Service regulates
these systems and their use in order to
protect postal revenue. Only Postal
Service–authorized product service
providers may design, produce, and
distribute Postage Evidencing Systems.
This proposed revision clarifies the
internal controls required in 39 CFR
501.15(i), Computerized Meter Resetting
system, and 501.16(f), PC Postage
Payment Methodology. This
requirement was added as part of a final
rule published in the Federal Register
on November 9, 2006, at 71 FR 65732.
Although exempt from the notice and
comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act [39 U.S.C.
410(a)], the Postal Service invites public
comment on the following proposed
revisions to the Code of Federal
Regulations (see 39 CFR part 501).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Postal Service.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO
MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE
POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR
part 501 continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY:
ADDRESSES:
30309
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101,
401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector
General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95–
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
2. Section 501.15 is amended by
revising paragraph (i) to read as follows:
§ 501.15 Computerized Meter Resetting
System.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Security and Revenue Protection.
To receive Postal Service approval to
continue to operate systems in the
CMRS environment, the RC must submit
to a periodic examination of its CMRS
system and any other applications and
technology infrastructure that may have
a material impact on Postal Service
revenues, as determined by the Postal
Service. The examination shall be
performed by a qualified, independent
audit firm and conducted in accordance
with the Statement on Auditing
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service
Organizations, developed by the
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA), as amended or
superseded. The examination shall
include testing of the operating
effectiveness of relevant RC internal
controls (Type II SAS 70 Report). If the
service organization uses another
service organization (sub-service
provider), Postal Service management
should consider the nature and
materiality of the transactions processed
by the sub-service organization and the
contribution of the sub-service
organization’s processes and controls in
the achievement of the Postal Service’s
information processing objectives. The
Postal Service should have access to the
sub-service organization’s SAS 70
report. The control objectives to be
covered by the SAS 70 report are subject
to Postal Service review and approval
and are to be provided to the Postal
Service 30 days prior to the initiation of
each examination period. As a result of
the examination, the auditor shall
provide the RC and the Postal Service
with an opinion on the design and
operating effectiveness of the RC’s
internal controls related to the CMRS
system and any other applications and
technology infrastructure considered
material to the services provided to the
Postal Service by the RC. Such
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
30310
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules
examinations are to be conducted on no
less than an annual basis, and are to be
as of and for the 12 months ended June
30 of each year (except for the period
ending June 30, 2010, for which the
period of coverage will be no less than
6 months, and except for new contracts
for which the examination period will
be no less than the period from the
contract date to the following June 30,
unless otherwise agreed to by the Postal
Service). The examination reports are to
be provided to the Postal Service by
August 15 of each year. To the extent
that internal control weaknesses are
identified in a Type II SAS 70 report,
the Postal Service may require the
remediation of such weaknesses, review
working papers, and engage in
discussions about the work performed
with the auditor. The Postal Service
requires that all remediation efforts (if
applicable) are completed and reported
by the RC prior to the Postal Service’s
fiscal year end (September 30). The RC
will be responsible for all costs to
conduct these examinations.
*
*
*
*
*
3. Section 501.16 is amended by
revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
§ 501.16 PC Postage Payment
Methodology.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Security and Revenue Protection.
To receive Postal Service approval to
continue to operate PC Postage systems,
the provider must submit to a periodic
examination of its PC Postage system
and any other applications and
technology infrastructure that may have
a material impact on Postal Service
revenues, as determined by the Postal
Service. The examination shall be
performed by a qualified, independent
audit firm and conducted in accordance
with the Statement on Auditing
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service
Organizations, developed by the
American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA), as amended or
superseded. The examination shall
include testing of the operating
effectiveness of relevant provider
internal controls (Type II SAS 70
Report). If the service organization uses
another service organization (subservice provider), Postal Service
management should consider the nature
and materiality of the transactions
processed by the sub-service
organization and the contribution of the
sub-service organization’s processes and
controls in the achievement of the
Postal Service’s information processing
objectives. The Postal Service should
have access to the sub-service
organization’s SAS 70 report. The
control objectives to be covered by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:12 May 28, 2010
Jkt 220001
SAS 70 report are subject to Postal
Service review and approval and are to
be provided to the Postal Service 30
days prior to the initiation of each
examination period. As a result of the
examination, the auditor shall provide
the provider, and the Postal Service,
with an opinion on the design and
operating effectiveness of the internal
controls related to the PC Postage
system and any other applications and
technology infrastructure considered
material to the services provided to the
Postal Service by the provider. Such
examinations are to be conducted on no
less than an annual basis, and are to be
as of and for the 12 months ended June
30 of each year (except for the period
ending June 30, 2010, for which the
period of coverage will be no less than
6 months, and except for new contracts
for which the examination period will
be no less than the period from the
contract date to the following June 30,
unless otherwise agreed to by the Postal
Service). The examination reports are to
be provided to the Postal Service by
August 15 of each year. To the extent
that internal control weaknesses are
identified in a Type II SAS 70 report,
the Postal Service may require the
remediation of such weaknesses, review
working papers, and engage in
discussions about the work performed
with the auditor. The provider will be
responsible for all costs to conduct these
examinations.
*
*
*
*
*
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010–12883 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0380; A–1–FRL–
9156–9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Connecticut; Determination of
Attainment of the 1997 Ozone Standard
for the Greater Connecticut Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to
determine that the Greater Connecticut,
moderate 1997 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area has attained the
1997 8-hour National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone.
This determination is based upon
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
complete, quality-assured, certified
ambient air monitoring data that show
the area has monitored attainment of the
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the
2007–2009 monitoring period. If this
proposed determination is made final,
under the provisions of EPA’s ozone
implementation rule, the requirements
for this area to submit an attainment
demonstration, a reasonable further
progress plan, contingency measures,
and other planning State
Implementation Plans related to
attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS shall be suspended for so long
as the area continues to attain the 1997
ozone NAAQS. In addition, EPA is
proposing to determine that this area
has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS as
of June 15, 2010, its applicable
attainment date, provided that the area
continues to attain the standard through
June 15, 2010.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R01–OAR–2010–0380 by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov
3. Fax: (617) 918–0047.
4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification
Number EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0380,’’
Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05–2), Boston,
MA 02109–3912.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: Anne Arnold,
Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, 5 Post
Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA
02109–3912. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office’s
normal hours of operation. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2010–
0380. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov, or e-mail,
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30309-30310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12883]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 501
Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and
Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems
AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this proposed rule, the Postal Service proposes to amend
regulations on Authorization to Manufacture and Distribute Postage
Evidencing Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the requirement
for examination by an independent audit firm of a Postage Evidencing
System Provider's Computerized Meter Resetting System (CMRS) or PC
Postage[supreg] system internal controls.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 1, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to the Manager, Postage
Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW.,
Suite 4200 NB, Washington, DC 20260-4200. Copies of all written
comments will be available for inspection and photocopying between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Postage Technology
Management office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Marketing Specialist,
Postage Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, at 202-268-7613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postage Evidencing Systems are devices or
systems of components that a customer uses to print evidence that the
prepaid postage required for mailing has been paid. They include, but
are not limited to, postage meters and PC Postage systems. The Postal
Service regulates these systems and their use in order to protect
postal revenue. Only Postal Service-authorized product service
providers may design, produce, and distribute Postage Evidencing
Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the internal controls
required in 39 CFR 501.15(i), Computerized Meter Resetting system, and
501.16(f), PC Postage Payment Methodology. This requirement was added
as part of a final rule published in the Federal Register on November
9, 2006, at 71 FR 65732.
Although exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act [39 U.S.C. 410(a)], the Postal Service
invites public comment on the following proposed revisions to the Code
of Federal Regulations (see 39 CFR part 501).
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501
Postal Service.
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410,
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.
2. Section 501.15 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 501.15 Computerized Meter Resetting System.
* * * * *
(i) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service
approval to continue to operate systems in the CMRS environment, the RC
must submit to a periodic examination of its CMRS system and any other
applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material
impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service.
The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit
firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended
or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating
effectiveness of relevant RC internal controls (Type II SAS 70 Report).
If the service organization uses another service organization (sub-
service provider), Postal Service management should consider the nature
and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service
organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization's
processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service's
information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have
access to the sub-service organization's SAS 70 report. The control
objectives to be covered by the SAS 70 report are subject to Postal
Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal
Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As
a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the RC and the
Postal Service with an opinion on the design and operating
effectiveness of the RC's internal controls related to the CMRS system
and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered
material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the RC. Such
[[Page 30310]]
examinations are to be conducted on no less than an annual basis, and
are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30 of each year
(except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the period of
coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new contracts
for which the examination period will be no less than the period from
the contract date to the following June 30, unless otherwise agreed to
by the Postal Service). The examination reports are to be provided to
the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the extent that
internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS 70 report,
the Postal Service may require the remediation of such weaknesses,
review working papers, and engage in discussions about the work
performed with the auditor. The Postal Service requires that all
remediation efforts (if applicable) are completed and reported by the
RC prior to the Postal Service's fiscal year end (September 30). The RC
will be responsible for all costs to conduct these examinations.
* * * * *
3. Section 501.16 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
Sec. 501.16 PC Postage Payment Methodology.
* * * * *
(f) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service
approval to continue to operate PC Postage systems, the provider must
submit to a periodic examination of its PC Postage system and any other
applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material
impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service.
The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit
firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended
or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating
effectiveness of relevant provider internal controls (Type II SAS 70
Report). If the service organization uses another service organization
(sub-service provider), Postal Service management should consider the
nature and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service
organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization's
processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service's
information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have
access to the sub-service organization's SAS 70 report. The control
objectives to be covered by the SAS 70 report are subject to Postal
Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal
Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As
a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the provider,
and the Postal Service, with an opinion on the design and operating
effectiveness of the internal controls related to the PC Postage system
and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered
material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the
provider. Such examinations are to be conducted on no less than an
annual basis, and are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30
of each year (except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the
period of coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new
contracts for which the examination period will be no less than the
period from the contract date to the following June 30, unless
otherwise agreed to by the Postal Service). The examination reports are
to be provided to the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the
extent that internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS
70 report, the Postal Service may require the remediation of such
weaknesses, review working papers, and engage in discussions about the
work performed with the auditor. The provider will be responsible for
all costs to conduct these examinations.
* * * * *
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-12883 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P