Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems, 30309-30310 [2010-12883]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 determination regarding the need for restrictions. (c) Evaluation of disruptive behavior. In making determinations under paragraph (b) of this section, the Chief of Staff or designee must consider all pertinent facts, including any prior counseling of the patient regarding his or her disruptive behavior or any pattern of such behavior, and whether the disruptive behavior is a result of the patient’s individual fears, preferences, or perceived needs. A patient’s disruptive behavior must be assessed in connection with VA’s duty to provide good quality care, including care designed to reduce or otherwise clinically address the patient’s behavior. (d) Restrictions. The restrictions on care imposed under this section may include but are not limited to: (1) Specifying the hours in which nonemergent outpatient care will be provided; (2) Arranging for medical and any other services to be provided in a particular patient care area (e.g., private exam room near an exit); (3) Arranging for medical and any other services to be provided at a specific site of care; (4) Specifying the health care provider, and related personnel, who will be involved with the patient’s care; (5) Requiring police escort; or (6) Authorizing VA providers to terminate an encounter immediately if certain behaviors occur. (e) Review of restrictions. The patient may request the Network Director’s review of any order issued under this section within 30 days of the effective date of the order by submitting a written request to the Chief of Staff. The Chief of Staff shall forward the order and the patient’s request to the Network Director for a final decision. The Network Director shall issue a final decision on this matter within 30 days. VA will enforce the order while it is under review by the network director. The Chief of Staff will provide the patient who made the request written notice of the Network Director’s final decision. Note: Although VA may restrict the time, place, and/or manner of care under this section, VA will continue to offer the full range of needed medical care to which a patient is eligible under title 38 of the United States Code or Code of Federal Regulations. Patients have the right to accept or refuse treatments or procedures, and such refusal by a patient is not a basis for restricting the provision of care under this section. (Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 901, 1721) [FR Doc. 2010–13048 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:12 May 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 POSTAL SERVICE 39 CFR Part 501 Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems Postal ServiceTM. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: In this proposed rule, the Postal Service proposes to amend regulations on Authorization to Manufacture and Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the requirement for examination by an independent audit firm of a Postage Evidencing System Provider’s Computerized Meter Resetting System (CMRS) or PC Postage® system internal controls. DATES: Submit comments on or before July 1, 2010. Mail or deliver written comments to the Manager, Postage Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 4200 NB, Washington, DC 20260–4200. Copies of all written comments will be available for inspection and photocopying between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Postage Technology Management office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Marketing Specialist, Postage Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, at 202–268–7613. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postage Evidencing Systems are devices or systems of components that a customer uses to print evidence that the prepaid postage required for mailing has been paid. They include, but are not limited to, postage meters and PC Postage systems. The Postal Service regulates these systems and their use in order to protect postal revenue. Only Postal Service–authorized product service providers may design, produce, and distribute Postage Evidencing Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the internal controls required in 39 CFR 501.15(i), Computerized Meter Resetting system, and 501.16(f), PC Postage Payment Methodology. This requirement was added as part of a final rule published in the Federal Register on November 9, 2006, at 71 FR 65732. Although exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act [39 U.S.C. 410(a)], the Postal Service invites public comment on the following proposed revisions to the Code of Federal Regulations (see 39 CFR part 501). PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501 Postal Service. Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 501—AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE EVIDENCING SYSTEMS 1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as follows: SUMMARY: ADDRESSES: 30309 Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95– 452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3. 2. Section 501.15 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as follows: § 501.15 Computerized Meter Resetting System. * * * * * (i) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service approval to continue to operate systems in the CMRS environment, the RC must submit to a periodic examination of its CMRS system and any other applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service. The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating effectiveness of relevant RC internal controls (Type II SAS 70 Report). If the service organization uses another service organization (sub-service provider), Postal Service management should consider the nature and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization’s processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service’s information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have access to the sub-service organization’s SAS 70 report. The control objectives to be covered by the SAS 70 report are subject to Postal Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the RC and the Postal Service with an opinion on the design and operating effectiveness of the RC’s internal controls related to the CMRS system and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the RC. Such E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM 01JNP1 30310 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 1, 2010 / Proposed Rules examinations are to be conducted on no less than an annual basis, and are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30 of each year (except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the period of coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new contracts for which the examination period will be no less than the period from the contract date to the following June 30, unless otherwise agreed to by the Postal Service). The examination reports are to be provided to the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the extent that internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS 70 report, the Postal Service may require the remediation of such weaknesses, review working papers, and engage in discussions about the work performed with the auditor. The Postal Service requires that all remediation efforts (if applicable) are completed and reported by the RC prior to the Postal Service’s fiscal year end (September 30). The RC will be responsible for all costs to conduct these examinations. * * * * * 3. Section 501.16 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows: § 501.16 PC Postage Payment Methodology. erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 * * * * * (f) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service approval to continue to operate PC Postage systems, the provider must submit to a periodic examination of its PC Postage system and any other applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service. The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating effectiveness of relevant provider internal controls (Type II SAS 70 Report). If the service organization uses another service organization (subservice provider), Postal Service management should consider the nature and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization’s processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service’s information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have access to the sub-service organization’s SAS 70 report. The control objectives to be covered by the VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:12 May 28, 2010 Jkt 220001 SAS 70 report are subject to Postal Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the provider, and the Postal Service, with an opinion on the design and operating effectiveness of the internal controls related to the PC Postage system and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the provider. Such examinations are to be conducted on no less than an annual basis, and are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30 of each year (except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the period of coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new contracts for which the examination period will be no less than the period from the contract date to the following June 30, unless otherwise agreed to by the Postal Service). The examination reports are to be provided to the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the extent that internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS 70 report, the Postal Service may require the remediation of such weaknesses, review working papers, and engage in discussions about the work performed with the auditor. The provider will be responsible for all costs to conduct these examinations. * * * * * Neva R. Watson, Attorney, Legislative. [FR Doc. 2010–12883 Filed 5–28–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0380; A–1–FRL– 9156–9] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Connecticut; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 Ozone Standard for the Greater Connecticut Area AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to determine that the Greater Connecticut, moderate 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is based upon PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 complete, quality-assured, certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has monitored attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the 2007–2009 monitoring period. If this proposed determination is made final, under the provisions of EPA’s ozone implementation rule, the requirements for this area to submit an attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency measures, and other planning State Implementation Plans related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS shall be suspended for so long as the area continues to attain the 1997 ozone NAAQS. In addition, EPA is proposing to determine that this area has attained the 1997 ozone NAAQS as of June 15, 2010, its applicable attainment date, provided that the area continues to attain the standard through June 15, 2010. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 1, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA– R01–OAR–2010–0380 by one of the following methods: 1. https://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov 3. Fax: (617) 918–0047. 4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification Number EPA–R01–OAR–2010–0380,’’ Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (mail code: OEP05–2), Boston, MA 02109–3912. 5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver your comments to: Anne Arnold, Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, MA 02109–3912. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2010– 0380. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through https:// www.regulations.gov, or e-mail, E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM 01JNP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 1, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30309-30310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

39 CFR Part 501


Revisions to the Requirements for Authority To Manufacture and 
Distribute Postage Evidencing Systems

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this proposed rule, the Postal Service proposes to amend 
regulations on Authorization to Manufacture and Distribute Postage 
Evidencing Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the requirement 
for examination by an independent audit firm of a Postage Evidencing 
System Provider's Computerized Meter Resetting System (CMRS) or PC 
Postage[supreg] system internal controls.

DATES: Submit comments on or before July 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Mail or deliver written comments to the Manager, Postage 
Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., 
Suite 4200 NB, Washington, DC 20260-4200. Copies of all written 
comments will be available for inspection and photocopying between 9 
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Postage Technology 
Management office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marlo Kay Ivey, Marketing Specialist, 
Postage Technology Management, U.S. Postal Service, at 202-268-7613.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postage Evidencing Systems are devices or 
systems of components that a customer uses to print evidence that the 
prepaid postage required for mailing has been paid. They include, but 
are not limited to, postage meters and PC Postage systems. The Postal 
Service regulates these systems and their use in order to protect 
postal revenue. Only Postal Service-authorized product service 
providers may design, produce, and distribute Postage Evidencing 
Systems. This proposed revision clarifies the internal controls 
required in 39 CFR 501.15(i), Computerized Meter Resetting system, and 
501.16(f), PC Postage Payment Methodology. This requirement was added 
as part of a final rule published in the Federal Register on November 
9, 2006, at 71 FR 65732.
    Although exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the 
Administrative Procedure Act [39 U.S.C. 410(a)], the Postal Service 
invites public comment on the following proposed revisions to the Code 
of Federal Regulations (see 39 CFR part 501).

List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 501

    Postal Service.

    Accordingly, 39 CFR part 501 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 501--AUTHORIZATION TO MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE POSTAGE 
EVIDENCING SYSTEMS

    1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 501 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 410, 
2601, 2605, Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended (Pub. L. 95-
452, as amended); 5 U.S.C. App. 3.

    2. Section 501.15 is amended by revising paragraph (i) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  501.15  Computerized Meter Resetting System.

* * * * *
    (i) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service 
approval to continue to operate systems in the CMRS environment, the RC 
must submit to a periodic examination of its CMRS system and any other 
applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material 
impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service. 
The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit 
firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing 
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended 
or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating 
effectiveness of relevant RC internal controls (Type II SAS 70 Report). 
If the service organization uses another service organization (sub-
service provider), Postal Service management should consider the nature 
and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service 
organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization's 
processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service's 
information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have 
access to the sub-service organization's SAS 70 report. The control 
objectives to be covered by the SAS 70 report are subject to Postal 
Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal 
Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As 
a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the RC and the 
Postal Service with an opinion on the design and operating 
effectiveness of the RC's internal controls related to the CMRS system 
and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered 
material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the RC. Such

[[Page 30310]]

examinations are to be conducted on no less than an annual basis, and 
are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30 of each year 
(except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the period of 
coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new contracts 
for which the examination period will be no less than the period from 
the contract date to the following June 30, unless otherwise agreed to 
by the Postal Service). The examination reports are to be provided to 
the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the extent that 
internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS 70 report, 
the Postal Service may require the remediation of such weaknesses, 
review working papers, and engage in discussions about the work 
performed with the auditor. The Postal Service requires that all 
remediation efforts (if applicable) are completed and reported by the 
RC prior to the Postal Service's fiscal year end (September 30). The RC 
will be responsible for all costs to conduct these examinations.
* * * * *
    3. Section 501.16 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  501.16  PC Postage Payment Methodology.

* * * * *
    (f) Security and Revenue Protection. To receive Postal Service 
approval to continue to operate PC Postage systems, the provider must 
submit to a periodic examination of its PC Postage system and any other 
applications and technology infrastructure that may have a material 
impact on Postal Service revenues, as determined by the Postal Service. 
The examination shall be performed by a qualified, independent audit 
firm and conducted in accordance with the Statement on Auditing 
Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, developed by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), as amended 
or superseded. The examination shall include testing of the operating 
effectiveness of relevant provider internal controls (Type II SAS 70 
Report). If the service organization uses another service organization 
(sub-service provider), Postal Service management should consider the 
nature and materiality of the transactions processed by the sub-service 
organization and the contribution of the sub-service organization's 
processes and controls in the achievement of the Postal Service's 
information processing objectives. The Postal Service should have 
access to the sub-service organization's SAS 70 report. The control 
objectives to be covered by the SAS 70 report are subject to Postal 
Service review and approval and are to be provided to the Postal 
Service 30 days prior to the initiation of each examination period. As 
a result of the examination, the auditor shall provide the provider, 
and the Postal Service, with an opinion on the design and operating 
effectiveness of the internal controls related to the PC Postage system 
and any other applications and technology infrastructure considered 
material to the services provided to the Postal Service by the 
provider. Such examinations are to be conducted on no less than an 
annual basis, and are to be as of and for the 12 months ended June 30 
of each year (except for the period ending June 30, 2010, for which the 
period of coverage will be no less than 6 months, and except for new 
contracts for which the examination period will be no less than the 
period from the contract date to the following June 30, unless 
otherwise agreed to by the Postal Service). The examination reports are 
to be provided to the Postal Service by August 15 of each year. To the 
extent that internal control weaknesses are identified in a Type II SAS 
70 report, the Postal Service may require the remediation of such 
weaknesses, review working papers, and engage in discussions about the 
work performed with the auditor. The provider will be responsible for 
all costs to conduct these examinations.
* * * * *

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-12883 Filed 5-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.