Withdrawal of Federal Antidegradation Policy for all Waters of the United States Within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 29899-29901 [2010-12933]
Download as PDF
29899
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Administrator, EPA Region 2,
submitting the SIP revision for parts 235
and 239 respectively.
New York State regulation
State effective date
Latest EPA approval date
*
*
Part 235, Consumer Products ..
....................
10/15/09
..................................................
*
*
5/28/10 [Insert FR page citation].
*
*
Part 239, Portable Fuel Container Spillage Control.
....................
7/30/09
..................................................
*
*
5/28/10 [insert FR page citation].
....................
..................................................
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2010–12917 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 131
[EPA–HQ–OW–2007–93; FRL–9156–5]
RIN NA2040
Withdrawal of Federal Antidegradation
Policy for all Waters of the United
States Within the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final Rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Comments
*
*
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
https://www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the OW Docket Center. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is (202) 566–2426,
and the Docket address is OW Docket,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744.
Janita Aguirre at EPA Headquarters,
Office of Water (4305T), 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460 (telephone: 202–566–1149,
fax: 202–566–0409 or e-mail:
aguirre.janita@epa.gov) or Denise
Hakowski at EPA Region 3 (3WP30),
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103 (telephone: 215–
814–5726, fax: 215–814–2318 or e-mail:
hakowski.denise@epa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Potentially Affected Entities
Citizens concerned with water quality
in Pennsylvania may be interested in
this rulemaking. Entities discharging
pollutants to the surface waters of
Pennsylvania could be indirectly
affected by this rulemaking since water
quality standards are used in
determining National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit limits. Because this action
withdraws a redundant Federal
antidegradation policy, the effect of this
rulemaking should be insignificant.
Categories and entities which may
ultimately be affected include:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
The specific application of provisions associated with alternate
test methods, variances and innovative products, must be
submitted to EPA as SIP revisions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
EPA is taking final action on
a 2008 proposal to withdraw the Federal
antidegradation policy for all waters of
the United States within the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We are
withdrawing the Federal
antidegradation policy to allow
Pennsylvania to implement its own
antidegradation policy. Pennsylvania
has adequately demonstrated that its
antidegradation policy protects all
waters of the United States at a level
consistent with the Federal
requirements under the Clean Water
Act. Therefore, the Federal
antidegradation policy is redundant.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OW–2007–93. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
SUMMARY:
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
§ 52.1679 EPA-approved New York State
regulations.
3. In § 52.1679, the table is amended
by revising the entries for Title 6, Part
235 and Part 239 to read as follows:
■
*
Category ..............
Industry ..............
Municipalities ....
*
Examples of potentially
affected entities.
Industries discharging
pollutants to surface
waters in Pennsylvania.
Publicly-owned treatment works discharging pollutants to
surface waters in
Pennsylvania.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding NPDES-regulated
entities likely to be affected by this
action. This table lists the types of
entities that EPA is now aware could
potentially be affected by this action.
II. Background
Section 303 (33 U.S.C. 1313) of the
Clean Water Act (CWA or Act) directs
States, with oversight by EPA, to adopt
water quality standards to protect the
public health and welfare, enhance the
quality of water and serve the purposes
of the CWA. Under section 303, States
are required to develop water quality
standards for their navigable waters, and
Section 303(c) and EPA’s implementing
regulations at 40 CFR part 131 require
State and Tribal water quality standards
to include the designated use or uses to
be made of the waters, water quality
criteria sufficient to protect those uses,
and an antidegradation policy. Under
the CWA and EPA’s regulations, States
are required to review their water
quality standards at least once every
three years and, if appropriate, revise or
adopt new standards. The results of this
triennial review must be submitted to
EPA, and EPA must approve or
disapprove any new or revised
standards. Section 303(c) of the CWA
authorizes the EPA Administrator to
promulgate water quality standards to
supersede State standards that EPA has
disapproved or in any case where the
Administrator determines that a new or
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
29900
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
revised standard is needed to meet the
CWA’s requirements.
In June 1994, EPA disapproved
Pennsylvania’s antidegradation
regulation after determining the
regulation was not consistent with the
Federal antidegradation regulation
found at 40 CFR 131.12. When the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) did
not act within the statutory timeframe to
address EPA’s findings, EPA
promulgated a Federal antidegradation
policy for all waters of the United States
within the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania at 40 CFR 131.32 on
December 9, 1996 (61 FR 64816). In
August 1999, PADEP submitted to EPA
revisions to its antidegradation policy
found in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 93. On
March 17, 2000, EPA approved most of
the revisions to Pennsylvania’s
regulations as meeting the requirements
of Federal regulations at 40 CFR
131.12(a)(1) and 131.12(a)(2), but
withheld action on Section 93.4b,
PADEP’s Exceptional Value (EV) Waters
designation, or Tier 3, until PADEP
ensured that EV designated waters
would be protected at the level
consistent with Federal regulations at 40
CFR 131.12(a)(3). In 2003, PADEP
published ‘‘Water Quality
Antidegradation Implementation
Guidance’’ (Document Number 391–
0300–002). In it, PADEP provides
guidance to its staff and information to
help the regulated community and the
public understand the implementation
of the antidegradation policy in
Pennsylvania. Based on a review of the
document in combination with the
PADEP’s antidegradation regulation,
EPA approved PADEP’s antidegradation
policy for Tier 3 waters on March 7,
2007. Because Pennsylvania now has an
EPA-approved antidegradation policy
meeting the Federal requirements at 40
CFR 131.12, the Federal antidegradation
regulation promulgated by EPA for
Pennsylvania is no longer needed and
EPA is withdrawing it with this action.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review)
This action withdraws Federal
requirements applicable in
Pennsylvania and imposes no regulatory
requirements or costs on any person or
entity. It does not interfere with the
action or planned action of another
agency, and does not have any
budgetary impacts or raise novel legal or
policy issues. Thus, it has been
determined that this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden because it
is administratively withdrawing Federal
requirements that no longer need to
apply in Pennsylvania. However, the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has previously approved the
information collection requirements
contained in the existing regulations 40
CFR part 131 under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB
control number 2040–0049. The OMB
control numbers for EPA’s regulations
in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally requires
an agency to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of a rule that is
subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This action
imposes no regulatory requirements or
costs on any small entity. Therefore, I
certify that this action will not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title III of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104–4)
establishes requirements for Federal
agencies to assess the effects of their
regulatory actions on State, Tribal, and
local governments and the private
sector. Today’s rule contains no Federal
mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, Tribal, or local governments or
the private sector because it imposes no
enforceable duty on any of these
entities. Thus, today’s rule is not subject
to the requirements of UMRA sections
202 and 205 for a written statement and
small government agency plan.
Similarly, EPA has determined that
this rule contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments and
is therefore not subject to UMRA section
203.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This rule does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive
Order 13132 does not apply to this
action.
F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments)
This rule does not have Tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This rule imposes no regulatory
requirements or costs on any Tribal
government. It does not have substantial
direct effects on Tribal governments, on
the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks)
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Risks and Safety Risks’’
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because
it is not economically significant and
EPA has no reason to believe the
environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this action present a
disproportionate risk to children.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use)
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001)), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer
Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through OMB, explanations
when the Agency decides not to use
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
available and applicable voluntary
consensus standards.
The requirements of section 12(d) of
the NTTAA do not apply because this
rule does not involve technical
standards. Therefore, EPA did not
consider the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
J. Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations)
PART 131—WATER QUALITY
STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 131
continues to read as follows:
■
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final
rule will not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or
low-income populations because it does
not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the
environment. As explained above, EPA
has approved Pennsylvania’s
antidegradation policy because it is
consistent with 40 CFR 131.12. This
rule withdraws a redundant
antidegradation policy.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective on June 28, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 131
Environmental protection,
Antidegradation, Water quality
standards.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
§ 131.32
[Removed and Reserved]
2. Section 131.32 is removed and
reserved.
■
[FR Doc. 2010–12933 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0268; FRL–8826–4]
Boscalid; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of boscalid in or
on multiple commodities which are
identified and discussed later in this
document. This regulation additionally
revises established tolerances in or on
fruit, stone, group 12; hog, fat; poultry,
fat; and poultry, meat byproducts.
Finally, this regulation deletes the timelimited tolerance on tangerine as it
expired on December 31, 2008. BASF
Corporation requested these tolerances
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May
28, 2010. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 27, 2010, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0268. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaja Joyner, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–3194; e-mail address:
joyner.shaja@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 180
PO 00000
29901
Sfmt 4700
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Get Electronic Access to
Other Related Information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
site at www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29899-29901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 131
[EPA-HQ-OW-2007-93; FRL-9156-5]
RIN NA2040
Withdrawal of Federal Antidegradation Policy for all Waters of
the United States Within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action on a 2008 proposal to withdraw the
Federal antidegradation policy for all waters of the United States
within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We are withdrawing the Federal
antidegradation policy to allow Pennsylvania to implement its own
antidegradation policy. Pennsylvania has adequately demonstrated that
its antidegradation policy protects all waters of the United States at
a level consistent with the Federal requirements under the Clean Water
Act. Therefore, the Federal antidegradation policy is redundant.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2007-93. All documents in the docket are listed on the
https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the OW Docket Center. This
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (202)
566-2426, and the Docket address is OW Docket, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is (202) 566-1744.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janita Aguirre at EPA Headquarters,
Office of Water (4305T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460 (telephone: 202-566-1149, fax: 202-566-0409 or e-mail:
aguirre.janita@epa.gov) or Denise Hakowski at EPA Region 3 (3WP30),
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 (telephone: 215-814-
5726, fax: 215-814-2318 or e-mail: hakowski.denise@epa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Potentially Affected Entities
Citizens concerned with water quality in Pennsylvania may be
interested in this rulemaking. Entities discharging pollutants to the
surface waters of Pennsylvania could be indirectly affected by this
rulemaking since water quality standards are used in determining
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit limits.
Because this action withdraws a redundant Federal antidegradation
policy, the effect of this rulemaking should be insignificant.
Categories and entities which may ultimately be affected include:
Category............................... Examples of potentially
affected entities.
Industry............................... Industries discharging
pollutants to surface waters
in Pennsylvania.
Municipalities......................... Publicly-owned treatment works
discharging pollutants to
surface waters in
Pennsylvania.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding NPDES-regulated entities likely to be
affected by this action. This table lists the types of entities that
EPA is now aware could potentially be affected by this action.
II. Background
Section 303 (33 U.S.C. 1313) of the Clean Water Act (CWA or Act)
directs States, with oversight by EPA, to adopt water quality standards
to protect the public health and welfare, enhance the quality of water
and serve the purposes of the CWA. Under section 303, States are
required to develop water quality standards for their navigable waters,
and Section 303(c) and EPA's implementing regulations at 40 CFR part
131 require State and Tribal water quality standards to include the
designated use or uses to be made of the waters, water quality criteria
sufficient to protect those uses, and an antidegradation policy. Under
the CWA and EPA's regulations, States are required to review their
water quality standards at least once every three years and, if
appropriate, revise or adopt new standards. The results of this
triennial review must be submitted to EPA, and EPA must approve or
disapprove any new or revised standards. Section 303(c) of the CWA
authorizes the EPA Administrator to promulgate water quality standards
to supersede State standards that EPA has disapproved or in any case
where the Administrator determines that a new or
[[Page 29900]]
revised standard is needed to meet the CWA's requirements.
In June 1994, EPA disapproved Pennsylvania's antidegradation
regulation after determining the regulation was not consistent with the
Federal antidegradation regulation found at 40 CFR 131.12. When the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) did not act
within the statutory timeframe to address EPA's findings, EPA
promulgated a Federal antidegradation policy for all waters of the
United States within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at 40 CFR 131.32
on December 9, 1996 (61 FR 64816). In August 1999, PADEP submitted to
EPA revisions to its antidegradation policy found in 25 Pa. Code
Chapter 93. On March 17, 2000, EPA approved most of the revisions to
Pennsylvania's regulations as meeting the requirements of Federal
regulations at 40 CFR 131.12(a)(1) and 131.12(a)(2), but withheld
action on Section 93.4b, PADEP's Exceptional Value (EV) Waters
designation, or Tier 3, until PADEP ensured that EV designated waters
would be protected at the level consistent with Federal regulations at
40 CFR 131.12(a)(3). In 2003, PADEP published ``Water Quality
Antidegradation Implementation Guidance'' (Document Number 391-0300-
002). In it, PADEP provides guidance to its staff and information to
help the regulated community and the public understand the
implementation of the antidegradation policy in Pennsylvania. Based on
a review of the document in combination with the PADEP's
antidegradation regulation, EPA approved PADEP's antidegradation policy
for Tier 3 waters on March 7, 2007. Because Pennsylvania now has an
EPA-approved antidegradation policy meeting the Federal requirements at
40 CFR 131.12, the Federal antidegradation regulation promulgated by
EPA for Pennsylvania is no longer needed and EPA is withdrawing it with
this action.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Review
A. Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review)
This action withdraws Federal requirements applicable in
Pennsylvania and imposes no regulatory requirements or costs on any
person or entity. It does not interfere with the action or planned
action of another agency, and does not have any budgetary impacts or
raise novel legal or policy issues. Thus, it has been determined that
this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden
because it is administratively withdrawing Federal requirements that no
longer need to apply in Pennsylvania. However, the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the information collection
requirements contained in the existing regulations 40 CFR part 131
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2040-0049. The OMB control
numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of a rule that is subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other
statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This action imposes no regulatory requirements or costs on any small
entity. Therefore, I certify that this action will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title III of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-
4) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on State, Tribal, and local governments and
the private sector. Today's rule contains no Federal mandates (under
the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, Tribal,
or local governments or the private sector because it imposes no
enforceable duty on any of these entities. Thus, today's rule is not
subject to the requirements of UMRA sections 202 and 205 for a written
statement and small government agency plan.
Similarly, EPA has determined that this rule contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments and is therefore not subject to UMRA section 203.
E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does
not apply to this action.
F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments)
This rule does not have Tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This rule
imposes no regulatory requirements or costs on any Tribal government.
It does not have substantial direct effects on Tribal governments, on
the relationship between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks)
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it is not economically significant and EPA has
no reason to believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed
by this action present a disproportionate risk to children.
H. Executive Order 13211 (Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution or Use)
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355
(May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note), directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not
to use
[[Page 29901]]
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
The requirements of section 12(d) of the NTTAA do not apply because
this rule does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA did not
consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.
J. Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations)
Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. As explained above, EPA has approved Pennsylvania's
antidegradation policy because it is consistent with 40 CFR 131.12.
This rule withdraws a redundant antidegradation policy.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective on June 28, 2010.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 131
Environmental protection, Antidegradation, Water quality standards.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 131--WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 131 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Sec. 131.32 [Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Section 131.32 is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. 2010-12933 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P