Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Elliott Bay Seawall Project, Seattle, WA, 30004-30005 [2010-12878]
Download as PDF
30004
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
The
Defense Intelligence Agency systems of
records notices subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, have been published in the
Federal Register and are available from
the DIA Privacy Act Coordinator,
Records Management Section, 200
MacDill Blvd, Washington DC 20340.
The Agency proposes to delete a
system of records notice in its inventory
of record systems subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
The proposed deletion is not within the
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, which requires the
submission of a new or altered system
report.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 25, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletions
LDIA 05–0001
SYSTEM NAME:
Human Resources Management
System (HRMS) (August 19, 2009; 74 FR
41874).
REASON:
The records collected and maintained
in this system are covered under OPM/
GOVT–1, General Personnel Records
(June 19, 2006; 71 FR 35342) and OPM/
GOVT–5, Recruiting, Examining, and
Placement Records (June 19, 2006; 71
FR 35351).
[FR Doc. 2010–12961 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Elliott Bay Seawall Project, Seattle,
WA
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
will prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for a proposed seawall
replacement project along the Elliott
Bay shoreline in Seattle, WA. The City
of Seattle is the non-Federal sponsor for
the project.
The Feasibility Study for the Elliott
Bay Seawall is being conducted under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
the authority of Section 209 (Puget
Sound and Adjacent Waters) of the
Flood Control Act of 1962 (Pub. L. 87–
874). The Reconnaissance Study was
initiated following specific
authorization by the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S.
House of Representatives, House
Resolution 2704, dated September 25,
2002. The Feasibility Study was
initiated in August 2004 with signing of
a Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement
between U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District (USACE) and the City of
Seattle, Washington (City). The
Feasibility Study authority was
subsequently modified in Section
4096(a) of WRDA 2007 to include an
evaluation of reducing future damages
to the seawall from seismic activity.
The existing Elliott Bay Seawall
(seawall) provides protection to Seattle’s
downtown waterfront from storm waves
and the erosive tidal forces of Puget
Sound. It supports Seattle’s waterfront
surface street, Alaskan Way and other
critical transportation infrastructure
(including the Burlington Northern—
Santa Fe Railway main line) and
utilities that serve downtown Seattle
(including water, electric, gas/
petroleum, steam, communications,
sanitary sewers and storm water
drainage). The Seawall also protects
numerous commercial, public and
residential structures and facilities,
including the Washington State Ferry
Terminal at Coleman Dock, Seattle’s
busiest fire station, the Seattle
Aquarium, and the Port of Seattle. The
seawall is 75 years old and is reaching
the end of its useful design life. The
timber elements of the structure have
experienced significant decay and
deterioration from continued exposure
to storm waves and tides, leading to
potential structural instability. Seawall
structural instability, and the likely
further deterioration from future waves
and tidal forces, is putting a tremendous
amount of public and private
infrastructure, residential and business
development, and transportation
facilities at risk of being damaged from
several different types of failure. An
earthquake of moderate intensity and/or
duration can cause liquefaction of the
soils supported by the wall, resulting in
loading conditions for which the
structure was not designed. Failure of
the seawall under any of these
circumstances would result in a high
risk to public safety and substantial
environmental degradation from
subsequent storm-generated waves and
tidal forces.
The purpose of the proposed
rehabilitation effort is to protect public
safety, critical infrastructure and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
associated economic activities along the
Elliott Bay shoreline from expected
future damages associated with coastal
storms, shoreline erosion and
earthquake damage that could lead to
failure of the existing seawall.
DATES: Submit comments by July 19,
2010 on the scope of issues to be
addressed in the Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS).
ADDRESSES: Address all comments
concerning this notice to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Seattle District, P.O. Box 3755, Seattle,
WA 98124–3755. Submit electronic
comments and supporting data to
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding the scoping process
or preparation of the DEIS may be
directed to Mr. Patrick Cagney,
telephone (206) 764–3654, email
patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil .
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The Elliott Bay
Seawall extends for a distance of
approximately 7,166 feet along Seattle’s
waterfront, between Washington Street
to the south and Broad Street to the
north. The proposed action would
involve an extensive structural rebuild
or replacement of the seawall in order
to reduce damage resulting from storms,
tidal forces, erosion and earthquakes.
The proposed action was previously
considered along with the proposed
replacement of the State Route (SR) 99
Alaskan Way Viaduct, which runs
parallel to a portion of the seawall. The
SR 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct and
Seawall Replacement Project Draft
Environmental Impact Statement
(AWVSRP DEIS) was issued by the U.S.
Department of Transportation Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA),
Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), and City of
Seattle on April 9, 2004 (69 FR 18898).
A Supplemental Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (AWVSRP SDEIS 1)
was issued by the same parties on July
28, 2006 (72 FR 42846). The AWVSRP
DEIS and SDEIS 1 included evaluation
of the rebuilding of the Alaskan Way
Seawall because it is essential to the
function of transportation facilities and
is at risk of collapsing in a large
earthquake. The geographic area
covered in the AWVSRP DEIS and
SDEIS 1 was virtually the same as the
study area proposed by the USACE.
The USACE EIS will evaluate the
seawall from a coastal storm and
earthquake damage reduction
perspective; the seawall is the primary
focus of the analysis. The USACE is
reviewing the existing body of work and
coordinating closely with the city of
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Seattle, FHWA, and WSDOT to
incorporate all relevant material from
their NEPA efforts, share information,
and reduce duplication of efforts.
2. Alternatives: A number of seawall
replacement alternatives are being
considered including the no action
alternative. Several structural, nonstructural and construction technique
options will be considered including
soil improvement, secant piles, and
buttress fill, among others; more than
one option may be included in the
preferred alternative. Additionally; in
conjunction with any of the structural
options, the seawall alignment will be
considered; examining where the
seawall face can be reconstructed in the
existing alignment or if it can be pulled
back landward. Similarly, habitat
restoration and recreational access
options will be considered with any of
the structural options. Public input is
specifically invited regarding the
reasonableness of the build alternatives
and whether any additional alternatives
are appropriate for consideration.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement:
An initial notice of intent for this
project was issued on March 31, 2006
(71 FR 16293). Since that time, the
scope of the project has changed to
include the evaluation of seismic
damages and to consider additional
alternatives. This present notice of
intent formally re-commences the
scoping process under NEPA. As part of
the scoping process, all affected Federal,
State and local agencies, Native
American Tribes, private organizations,
and the public are invited to comment
on the scope of the EIS. To date, the
following issues of concern have been
identified for in-depth analysis in the
draft EIS: (1) Construction impacts,
particularly those related to noise,
transportation, and effects to businesses
and residences within/adjacent to the
construction zone; (2) impacts
associated with potential variations of
the existing seawall alignment; (3)
potential impacts to historical
properties; and (4) potential benefits to
the Elliott Bay aquatic ecosystem.
4. Scoping Meeting: One public
scoping meeting will be held to identify
issues of major concern, identify studies
that might be needed in order to analyze
and evaluate impacts, and obtain public
input on the range and acceptability of
alternatives. This meeting will be held
at the Bell Harbor International
Conference Center, Pier 66 on
Wednesday, June 16, 2010. An informal
open house will be held between 4 and
5:30 p.m. A presentation to summarize
the purpose of scoping and existing
information will be made between 5:30
and 6 p.m. Then, testimony will be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
taken between 6 and 7 p.m. Verbal
(maximum 3 minutes) or written
comments will be accepted at the
scoping meeting or written comments
may be sent by regular or electronic
mail to EIS Scoping Comments c/o
Patrick Cagney (see ADDRESSES).
Ongoing communication with agencies,
Native American tribes, public interest
groups, and interested citizens will take
place throughout the EIS development
through the use of public meetings,
mailings, and the Internet. Additional
meetings will be scheduled upon
completion of the DEIS.
5. Other Environmental Review
Coordination and Permit Requirements:
The environmental review process will
be comprehensive and will satisfy the
requirements of both NEPA and the
Washington State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) per preparation of a joint
NEPA/SEPA document with the City of
Seattle. All other relevant Federal, State
and local environmental laws will be
complied with during the feasibility
and/or design phases of the project.
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Anthony Wright,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District
Commander.
[FR Doc. 2010–12878 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services; List of
Correspondence
Department of Education.
List of Correspondence from
October 1, 2009 through December 31,
2009.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Secretary is publishing
the following list pursuant to section
607(f) of the Individuals with
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
Under section 607(f) of the IDEA, the
Secretary is required, on a quarterly
basis, to publish in the Federal Register
a list of correspondence from the U.S.
Department of Education (Department)
received by individuals during the
previous quarter that describes the
interpretations of the Department of the
IDEA or the regulations that implement
the IDEA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel Nishi or Mary Louise Dirrigl.
Telephone: (202) 245–7468.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), you can call
the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of this notice in an
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30005
accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the contact persons listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following list identifies correspondence
from the Department issued from
October 1, 2009 through December 31,
2009. Included on the list are those
letters that contain interpretations of the
requirements of the IDEA and its
implementing regulations, as well as
letters and other documents that the
Department believes will assist the
public in understanding the
requirements of the law and its
regulations. The date of and topic
addressed by each letter are identified,
and summary information is also
provided, as appropriate. To protect the
privacy interests of the individual or
individuals involved, personally
identifiable information has been
redacted, as appropriate.
Part B—Assistance for Education of All
Children With Disabilities
Section 611—Authorization; Allotment;
Use of Funds; Authorization of
Appropriations
Topic Addressed: State Administration
Æ Letters dated November 13, 2009 to
Senator Lamar Alexander, Senator
Richard M. Burr, Senator Tom Coburn,
Senator Michael B. Enzi, Senator Judd
Gregg, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, and
Senator Johnny Isakson, regarding the
Secretary’s authority to adjust the
statutory caps on State administration
for Federal fiscal year 2009 under
section 611 of the IDEA and Title I of
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended, to
help defray the costs of implementing
the data collection requirements
associated with the American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).
Topic Addressed: Use of Funds
Æ Letter dated October 27, 2009 to
National Association of Private Special
Education Centers Executive Director
and CEO Sherry L. Kolbe, clarifying
when Part B, IDEA funds may be used
for professional development activities
for private school personnel and
contractors serving children with
disabilities placed in private schools by
public agencies.
Section 612—State Eligibility
Topic Addressed: Maintenance of State
Financial Support
Æ Office of Special Education
Programs Memorandum 10–5, dated
December 2, 2009 to Chief State School
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30004-30005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12878]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Elliott Bay Seawall Project, Seattle, WA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for a
proposed seawall replacement project along the Elliott Bay shoreline in
Seattle, WA. The City of Seattle is the non-Federal sponsor for the
project.
The Feasibility Study for the Elliott Bay Seawall is being
conducted under the authority of Section 209 (Puget Sound and Adjacent
Waters) of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Pub. L. 87-874). The
Reconnaissance Study was initiated following specific authorization by
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of
Representatives, House Resolution 2704, dated September 25, 2002. The
Feasibility Study was initiated in August 2004 with signing of a
Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement between U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Seattle District (USACE) and the City of Seattle, Washington
(City). The Feasibility Study authority was subsequently modified in
Section 4096(a) of WRDA 2007 to include an evaluation of reducing
future damages to the seawall from seismic activity.
The existing Elliott Bay Seawall (seawall) provides protection to
Seattle's downtown waterfront from storm waves and the erosive tidal
forces of Puget Sound. It supports Seattle's waterfront surface street,
Alaskan Way and other critical transportation infrastructure (including
the Burlington Northern--Santa Fe Railway main line) and utilities that
serve downtown Seattle (including water, electric, gas/petroleum,
steam, communications, sanitary sewers and storm water drainage). The
Seawall also protects numerous commercial, public and residential
structures and facilities, including the Washington State Ferry
Terminal at Coleman Dock, Seattle's busiest fire station, the Seattle
Aquarium, and the Port of Seattle. The seawall is 75 years old and is
reaching the end of its useful design life. The timber elements of the
structure have experienced significant decay and deterioration from
continued exposure to storm waves and tides, leading to potential
structural instability. Seawall structural instability, and the likely
further deterioration from future waves and tidal forces, is putting a
tremendous amount of public and private infrastructure, residential and
business development, and transportation facilities at risk of being
damaged from several different types of failure. An earthquake of
moderate intensity and/or duration can cause liquefaction of the soils
supported by the wall, resulting in loading conditions for which the
structure was not designed. Failure of the seawall under any of these
circumstances would result in a high risk to public safety and
substantial environmental degradation from subsequent storm-generated
waves and tidal forces.
The purpose of the proposed rehabilitation effort is to protect
public safety, critical infrastructure and associated economic
activities along the Elliott Bay shoreline from expected future damages
associated with coastal storms, shoreline erosion and earthquake damage
that could lead to failure of the existing seawall.
DATES: Submit comments by July 19, 2010 on the scope of issues to be
addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS).
ADDRESSES: Address all comments concerning this notice to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, P.O. Box 3755,
Seattle, WA 98124-3755. Submit electronic comments and supporting data
to patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the scoping
process or preparation of the DEIS may be directed to Mr. Patrick
Cagney, telephone (206) 764-3654, email patrick.t.cagney@usace.army.mil
.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The Elliott Bay Seawall extends for a distance
of approximately 7,166 feet along Seattle's waterfront, between
Washington Street to the south and Broad Street to the north. The
proposed action would involve an extensive structural rebuild or
replacement of the seawall in order to reduce damage resulting from
storms, tidal forces, erosion and earthquakes.
The proposed action was previously considered along with the
proposed replacement of the State Route (SR) 99 Alaskan Way Viaduct,
which runs parallel to a portion of the seawall. The SR 99 Alaskan Way
Viaduct and Seawall Replacement Project Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (AWVSRP DEIS) was issued by the U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and City of Seattle on April 9,
2004 (69 FR 18898). A Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(AWVSRP SDEIS 1) was issued by the same parties on July 28, 2006 (72 FR
42846). The AWVSRP DEIS and SDEIS 1 included evaluation of the
rebuilding of the Alaskan Way Seawall because it is essential to the
function of transportation facilities and is at risk of collapsing in a
large earthquake. The geographic area covered in the AWVSRP DEIS and
SDEIS 1 was virtually the same as the study area proposed by the USACE.
The USACE EIS will evaluate the seawall from a coastal storm and
earthquake damage reduction perspective; the seawall is the primary
focus of the analysis. The USACE is reviewing the existing body of work
and coordinating closely with the city of
[[Page 30005]]
Seattle, FHWA, and WSDOT to incorporate all relevant material from
their NEPA efforts, share information, and reduce duplication of
efforts.
2. Alternatives: A number of seawall replacement alternatives are
being considered including the no action alternative. Several
structural, non-structural and construction technique options will be
considered including soil improvement, secant piles, and buttress fill,
among others; more than one option may be included in the preferred
alternative. Additionally; in conjunction with any of the structural
options, the seawall alignment will be considered; examining where the
seawall face can be reconstructed in the existing alignment or if it
can be pulled back landward. Similarly, habitat restoration and
recreational access options will be considered with any of the
structural options. Public input is specifically invited regarding the
reasonableness of the build alternatives and whether any additional
alternatives are appropriate for consideration.
3. Scoping and Public Involvement: An initial notice of intent for
this project was issued on March 31, 2006 (71 FR 16293). Since that
time, the scope of the project has changed to include the evaluation of
seismic damages and to consider additional alternatives. This present
notice of intent formally re-commences the scoping process under NEPA.
As part of the scoping process, all affected Federal, State and local
agencies, Native American Tribes, private organizations, and the public
are invited to comment on the scope of the EIS. To date, the following
issues of concern have been identified for in-depth analysis in the
draft EIS: (1) Construction impacts, particularly those related to
noise, transportation, and effects to businesses and residences within/
adjacent to the construction zone; (2) impacts associated with
potential variations of the existing seawall alignment; (3) potential
impacts to historical properties; and (4) potential benefits to the
Elliott Bay aquatic ecosystem.
4. Scoping Meeting: One public scoping meeting will be held to
identify issues of major concern, identify studies that might be needed
in order to analyze and evaluate impacts, and obtain public input on
the range and acceptability of alternatives. This meeting will be held
at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center, Pier 66 on
Wednesday, June 16, 2010. An informal open house will be held between 4
and 5:30 p.m. A presentation to summarize the purpose of scoping and
existing information will be made between 5:30 and 6 p.m. Then,
testimony will be taken between 6 and 7 p.m. Verbal (maximum 3 minutes)
or written comments will be accepted at the scoping meeting or written
comments may be sent by regular or electronic mail to EIS Scoping
Comments c/o Patrick Cagney (see ADDRESSES). Ongoing communication with
agencies, Native American tribes, public interest groups, and
interested citizens will take place throughout the EIS development
through the use of public meetings, mailings, and the Internet.
Additional meetings will be scheduled upon completion of the DEIS.
5. Other Environmental Review Coordination and Permit Requirements:
The environmental review process will be comprehensive and will satisfy
the requirements of both NEPA and the Washington State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) per preparation of a joint NEPA/SEPA document with
the City of Seattle. All other relevant Federal, State and local
environmental laws will be complied with during the feasibility and/or
design phases of the project.
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Anthony Wright,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Commander.
[FR Doc. 2010-12878 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P