Special Conditions: Cirrus Design Corporation Model SF50 Airplane; Function and Reliability Testing, 29962-29963 [2010-12875]
Download as PDF
29962
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
format specified in writing by the
Director.
§ 1281.22
Periodic reports.
Each Bank shall provide to the
Director such reports, information and
data as the Director may request from
time to time, or as may be supplemented
in the DRM.
§ 1281.23
Bank data integrity.
(a) Certification.—(1) The senior
officer of each Bank who is responsible
for submitting the annual mortgage
report, or for submitting any other
report(s), data or other information for
which certification is requested in
writing by the Director, shall certify
such report(s), data or information.
(2) The certification shall state as
follows: ‘‘To the best of my knowledge
and belief, the information provided
herein is true, correct and complete.’’
(b) Adjustment to correct errors,
omissions or discrepancies. FHFA shall
determine on an annual basis the
official housing goals performance
figures for a Bank that is subject to the
housing goals. FHFA may resolve any
error, omission or discrepancy by
adjusting the Bank’s official housing
goals performance figure. If the Director
determines that the year-end data
reported by a Bank for a year preceding
the latest year for which data on
housing goals performance was reported
to FHFA contained a material error,
omission or discrepancy, the Director
may increase the corresponding housing
goal for the current year by the number
of mortgages that the Director
determines were overstated in the prior
year’s goal performance.
Dated: May 24, 2010.
Edward J. DeMarco,
Acting Director, Federal Housing Finance
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010–12849 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE308; Notice No. 23–10–02–
SC]
Special Conditions: Cirrus Design
Corporation Model SF50 Airplane;
Function and Reliability Testing
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
SUMMARY: This action proposes special
conditions for the Cirrus Design
Corporation SF50 airplane. This
airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature(s) associated with the
complex design and performance
features consistent with larger airplanes.
The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this
design feature. These proposed special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: We must receive your comments
by June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your
comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel,
ACE–7, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO
64106. You may deliver two copies to
the Regional Counsel at the above
address. Mark your comments: Docket
No. CE308. You may inspect comments
in the Rules Docket weekdays, except
Federal holidays, between 7:30 a.m. and
4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
J. Lowell Foster, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas
City, MO 64106; telephone (816) 329–
4125; facsimile (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested persons to take
submit such written data, views, or
arguments as they desire. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You may
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change these special conditions
based on the comments we receive.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
If you want us to let you know we
received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a preaddressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will
stamp the date on the postcard and mail
it back to you.
Background
On April 29, 2010, Cirrus Design
Corporation applied for a type
certificate for their new Model SF 50
‘‘Vision’’ Jet. The SF50 is a low-wing,
five-plus-two-place (2 children), singleengine turbofan-powered aircraft. It
incorporates an Electronic Flight
Information System (EFIS), pressurized
cabin, retractable gear, and a V-tail. The
turbofan engine is mounted on the
upper fuselage/tail cone along the
aircraft centerline. It is constructed
largely of carbon and fiberglass
composite materials. Like other Cirrus
products, the SF50 includes a
ballistically deployed airframe
parachute.
The model SF50 has a maximum
operating altitude of 28,000 feet, where
it cruises at speeds up to 300 KTAS. Its
VMO will not exceed 0.62 Mach. The
maximum takeoff weight will be at or
below 6000 pounds with a range at
economy cruise of roughly 1000 nm.
Cirrus intends for the model SF50 to be
certified for single-pilot operations
under 14 CFR part 91 and 14 CFR part
135 operating rules. The following
operating conditions will be included:
• Day and Night VFR.
• IFR.
• Flight into Known Icing.
Discussion
Before Amendment 3–4, Section 3.19
of Civil Air Regulation (CAR) part 3
required service testing of all airplanes
type certificated on or after May 15,
1947. The purpose of the testing was to
‘‘ascertain whether there is reasonable
assurance that the airplane, its
components, and equipment are
reliable, and function properly.’’
Amendment 3–4 to CAR part 3
became effective January 15, 1951, and
deleted the service test requirements in
Section 3.19 for airplanes of 6,000
pounds maximum weight or less. The
introductory text published in
Amendment 3–4 explained that most of
the significant changes in the
amendment stemmed from ‘‘the desire
for simplification of the rules in this
part with respect to the smaller
airplanes, specifically those of 6,000
pounds maximum weight or less, which
would be expected to be used mainly as
personal airplanes.’’ The introductory
material also stated the service test
requirement was removed for airplanes
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
of 6,000 pounds maximum weight or
less because ‘‘experience seems to
indicate that this rule imposes a burden
upon the manufacturers not
commensurate with the safety gained.’’
The requirement for Function and
Reliability (F&R) testing, and the
exception for airplanes of 6,000 pounds
or less maximum weight, is now found
in 14 CFR part 21, section 21.35(b)(2).
The decision to exempt airplanes of
6,000 pounds maximum weight or less
from F&R testing was based on the state
of technology envisioned in 1951. At
that time, airplanes of 6,000 pounds
maximum weight or less were expected
to be used mainly as personal airplanes.
They used simple, ‘‘stand-alone’’
systems whose failure was more likely
to be an inconvenience than an
accident. The situation is different
today. Technological advances allow
airplanes weighing less than 6,000
pounds to be more complex and
integrated than some transports. New
part 23 airplanes can incorporate
sophisticated equipment not previously
used in a part 23 aircraft. Additionally,
part 23 airplanes are being used for
business and commercial transportation.
They should no longer be envisioned
mainly as personal airplanes. Therefore,
a special condition to require F&R
testing for airplanes weighing 6,000
pounds or less is needed where the level
of sophistication is beyond evaluating
failures by inspection.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Cirrus Design Corporation must show
that the SF50 meets the applicable
provisions of part 23, as amended by
Amendment 23–1 through 23–59
thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., part 23) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the SF
50 because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the SF50 must comply with
the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the
noise certification requirements of 14
CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38 and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:15 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The SF 50 will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features: Complex design and
performance features consistent with
technologically advanced aircraft over
6,000 pounds.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the SF50.
Should Cirrus Design Corporation apply
at a later date for a change to the type
certificate to include another model
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on model
SF50 airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following Special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Cirrus
Design Corporation model SF50
airplanes.
1. Function and Reliability Testing
Flight tests: In place of 14 CFR part
21.35(b)(2), the following applies:
(b) Upon showing compliance with
paragraph (a) of 14 CFR part 21.35(a),
the applicant must make all flight tests
that the Administrator finds necessary—
(2) For aircraft to be certificated under
this subchapter to determine whether
there is reasonable assurance that the
aircraft, its components, and its
equipment are reliable and function
properly.
Additionally the provisions of 14 CFR
part 21.35(c) and 21.35(f) then apply:
(c) Each applicant must, if practicable,
make the tests described in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section upon the aircraft
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29963
that was used to show compliance
with—
(1) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
and
(2) —.
(f) The flight tests prescribed in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section must
include—
(1) For aircraft incorporating turbine
engines of a type not previously used in
a type certificated aircraft, at least 300
hours of operation with a full
complement of engines that conform to
a type certificate; and
(2) For all other aircraft, at least 150
hours of operation.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 18,
2010.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–12875 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0387; Airspace
Docket No. 10–ANM–1]
Proposed Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Eastsound, WA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: This action proposes to
remove Class E surface airspace at Orcas
Island Airport, Eastsound, WA.
Controlled airspace already exists in the
Eastsound, WA, area to accommodate
the safety and management of aircraft
operations at Orcas Island Airport.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 12, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202)
366–9826. You must identify FAA
Docket No. FAA–2010–0387; Airspace
Docket No. 10–ANM–1, at the beginning
of your comments. You may also submit
comments through the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057;
telephone (425) 203–4537.
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29962-29963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12875]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 23
[Docket No. CE308; Notice No. 23-10-02-SC]
Special Conditions: Cirrus Design Corporation Model SF50
Airplane; Function and Reliability Testing
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for the Cirrus Design
Corporation SF50 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature(s) associated with the complex design and performance
features consistent with larger airplanes. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: We must receive your comments by June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Mail two copies of your comments to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Regional Counsel, ACE-7, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO
64106. You may deliver two copies to the Regional Counsel at the above
address. Mark your comments: Docket No. CE308. You may inspect comments
in the Rules Docket weekdays, except Federal holidays, between 7:30
a.m. and 4 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Lowell Foster, Federal Aviation
Administration, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone (816)
329-4125; facsimile (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite interested persons to take submit such written data,
views, or arguments as they desire. The most helpful comments reference
a specific portion of the special conditions, explain the reason for
any recommended change, and include supporting data. We ask that you
send us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You may inspect the docket before and
after the comment closing date. If you wish to review the docket in
person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we receive by the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring expense or delay. We may change these special
conditions based on the comments we receive.
If you want us to let you know we received your comments on these
special conditions, send us a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on which
the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it back to you.
Background
On April 29, 2010, Cirrus Design Corporation applied for a type
certificate for their new Model SF 50 ``Vision'' Jet. The SF50 is a
low-wing, five-plus-two-place (2 children), single-engine turbofan-
powered aircraft. It incorporates an Electronic Flight Information
System (EFIS), pressurized cabin, retractable gear, and a V-tail. The
turbofan engine is mounted on the upper fuselage/tail cone along the
aircraft centerline. It is constructed largely of carbon and fiberglass
composite materials. Like other Cirrus products, the SF50 includes a
ballistically deployed airframe parachute.
The model SF50 has a maximum operating altitude of 28,000 feet,
where it cruises at speeds up to 300 KTAS. Its VMO will not
exceed 0.62 Mach. The maximum takeoff weight will be at or below 6000
pounds with a range at economy cruise of roughly 1000 nm. Cirrus
intends for the model SF50 to be certified for single-pilot operations
under 14 CFR part 91 and 14 CFR part 135 operating rules. The following
operating conditions will be included:
Day and Night VFR.
IFR.
Flight into Known Icing.
Discussion
Before Amendment 3-4, Section 3.19 of Civil Air Regulation (CAR)
part 3 required service testing of all airplanes type certificated on
or after May 15, 1947. The purpose of the testing was to ``ascertain
whether there is reasonable assurance that the airplane, its
components, and equipment are reliable, and function properly.''
Amendment 3-4 to CAR part 3 became effective January 15, 1951, and
deleted the service test requirements in Section 3.19 for airplanes of
6,000 pounds maximum weight or less. The introductory text published in
Amendment 3-4 explained that most of the significant changes in the
amendment stemmed from ``the desire for simplification of the rules in
this part with respect to the smaller airplanes, specifically those of
6,000 pounds maximum weight or less, which would be expected to be used
mainly as personal airplanes.'' The introductory material also stated
the service test requirement was removed for airplanes
[[Page 29963]]
of 6,000 pounds maximum weight or less because ``experience seems to
indicate that this rule imposes a burden upon the manufacturers not
commensurate with the safety gained.'' The requirement for Function and
Reliability (F&R) testing, and the exception for airplanes of 6,000
pounds or less maximum weight, is now found in 14 CFR part 21, section
21.35(b)(2).
The decision to exempt airplanes of 6,000 pounds maximum weight or
less from F&R testing was based on the state of technology envisioned
in 1951. At that time, airplanes of 6,000 pounds maximum weight or less
were expected to be used mainly as personal airplanes. They used
simple, ``stand-alone'' systems whose failure was more likely to be an
inconvenience than an accident. The situation is different today.
Technological advances allow airplanes weighing less than 6,000 pounds
to be more complex and integrated than some transports. New part 23
airplanes can incorporate sophisticated equipment not previously used
in a part 23 aircraft. Additionally, part 23 airplanes are being used
for business and commercial transportation. They should no longer be
envisioned mainly as personal airplanes. Therefore, a special condition
to require F&R testing for airplanes weighing 6,000 pounds or less is
needed where the level of sophistication is beyond evaluating failures
by inspection.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Cirrus Design Corporation
must show that the SF50 meets the applicable provisions of part 23, as
amended by Amendment 23-1 through 23-59 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., part 23) do not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for the SF 50 because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are prescribed under the provisions of
Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the SF50 must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36; and the FAA must issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise
Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38 and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special conditions would also apply to the
other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The SF 50 will incorporate the following novel or unusual design
features: Complex design and performance features consistent with
technologically advanced aircraft over 6,000 pounds.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
SF50. Should Cirrus Design Corporation apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on model SF50 airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability and
affects only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these
features on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and symbols.
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and 44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and
21.17; and 14 CFR 11.38 and 11.19.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposes the
following Special conditions as part of the type certification basis
for Cirrus Design Corporation model SF50 airplanes.
1. Function and Reliability Testing
Flight tests: In place of 14 CFR part 21.35(b)(2), the following
applies:
(b) Upon showing compliance with paragraph (a) of 14 CFR part
21.35(a), the applicant must make all flight tests that the
Administrator finds necessary--
(2) For aircraft to be certificated under this subchapter to
determine whether there is reasonable assurance that the aircraft, its
components, and its equipment are reliable and function properly.
Additionally the provisions of 14 CFR part 21.35(c) and 21.35(f)
then apply:
(c) Each applicant must, if practicable, make the tests described
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section upon the aircraft that was used to
show compliance with--
(1) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and
(2) --.
(f) The flight tests prescribed in paragraph (b)(2) of this section
must include--
(1) For aircraft incorporating turbine engines of a type not
previously used in a type certificated aircraft, at least 300 hours of
operation with a full complement of engines that conform to a type
certificate; and
(2) For all other aircraft, at least 150 hours of operation.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 18, 2010.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-12875 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P