Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures, 29915-29917 [2010-12834]
Download as PDF
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
Speech–to–Speech Services, E911
Requirements for IP–Enabled Service
Providers, Report Order and Order on
Reconsideration (Second Report and
Order). This document is consistent
with the Second Report and Order,
which stated that the Commission
would publish a document in the
Federal Register announcing the
effective date of the revised rules.
DATES: The rules published at 73 FR
79683, December 30, 2008, are effective
May 28, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Hlibok, Disability Rights Office,
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau, at (202) 559–5158 (voice) or
(202) 418–0431(TTY), or email:
Gregory.Hlibok@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document announces that, on November
23, 2009, OMB approved, for a period of
three years, the information collection
requirements contained in the
Commission’s Second Report and Order
and in the Commission’s rules at 47 CFR
64.605, FCC 08–275, published at 73 FR
79683, December 30, 2008. The OMB
Control Number is 3060–1089. The
Commission publishes this document as
an announcement of the effective date of
the revised rules. If you have any
comments on the burden estimates
listed below, or how the Commission
can improve the collections and reduce
any burdens caused thereby, please
contact Cathy Williams, Federal
Communications Commission, Room 1–
C823, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington,
DC 20554. Please include the OMB
Control Number, 3060–1089, in your
correspondence. The Commission will
also accept your comments via the
Internet if you send them to
PRA@fcc.gov and
Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(Braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an e–mail to
fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer
and Governmental Affairs Bureau at
(202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
SYNOPSIS
As required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507),
the FCC is notifying the public that it
received OMB approval on November
23, 2009, for the information collection
requirements contained in the
Commission’s Second Report and Order
and the Commission’s rules at 47 CFR
64.605. The OMB Control Number is
3060–1089. The total annual reporting
burden for respondents for these
collections of information, including the
time for gathering and maintaining the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
collection of information, is estimated to
be: 12 respondents, 5,608,692 responses,
total annual burden hours of 206,061
hours, and $4,251,635 in total annual
costs.
Under 5 CFR 1320, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a current,
valid OMB Control Number.
No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act that does not
display a current valid OMB Control
Number.
The foregoing document is required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, Public Law 104–13, October 1,
1995, and 44 U.S.C. 3507.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary,
Office of the Secretary,
Office of Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–12810 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration
[Docket No. FMCSA–2009–0354]
RIN 2126–AB23
Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: FMCSA amends its
regulations by establishing direct final
rulemaking procedures for use on
routine or noncontroversial rules. Under
these procedures, FMCSA will make
regulatory changes that will become
effective a specified number of days
after the date of publication in the
Federal Register, unless FMCSA
receives written adverse comment(s) or
written notice of intent to submit
adverse comment(s) by the date
specified in the direct final rule. These
new procedures will expedite the
promulgation of routine or
noncontroversial rules by reducing the
time and resources necessary to
develop, review, clear, and publish
separate proposed and final rules.
FMCSA will not use the direct final rule
procedures for complex or controversial
issues.
DATES: Effective Date: May 28, 2010.
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
ADDRESSES: Docket: For access to the
docket to read background documents
including those referenced in this
document, or to read comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov by searching
Docket ID number FMCSA 2009–0354 at
any time or to the ground floor, room
W12–140, DOT Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC,
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form for all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review U.S. Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19476) or you may visit https://
dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bivan R. Patnaik, Chief, Regulatory
Development Division, Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington,
DC 20590, (202) 366–8092.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
49 CFR Part 389
PO 00000
29915
Sfmt 4700
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) specifically
provides that notice and comment
rulemaking procedures are not required
where the Agency determines that there
is good cause to dispense with them.
Generally, good cause exists where the
procedures are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). FMCSA
proposes to use direct final rulemaking
to streamline the rulemaking process
where the rule is noncontroversial and
the Agency does not expect adverse
comment.
Direct final rulemaking will make
more efficient use of FMCSA resources
by reducing the time and resources
necessary to develop, review, clear, and
publish separate proposed and final
rules for rules the Agency expects to be
noncontroversial and unlikely to result
in adverse public comment. A number
of Federal agencies use this process,
including various Department of
Transportation operating
administrations. For example, on
January 30, 2004, the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation published a
final rule adopting direct final rule
procedures (69 FR 4455) and the Federal
Railroad Administration published a
final rule adopting direct final rule
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
29916
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
procedures on March 7, 2007 (72 FR
10086).
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Direct Final Rule Procedures Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
FMCSA proposed direct final
rulemaking procedures in an NPRM
published on March 17, 2010, in the
Federal Register (75 FR 12720). The
NPRM described the process of how
FMCSA will determine whether a
particular rulemaking is
noncontroversial and unlikely to result
in adverse comments. The NPRM also
described how FMCSA determines
whether a comment is adverse or not.
Discussion of Comments Received on
the NPRM
FMCSA provided a 30-day comment
period that ended on April 16, 2010. In
response, the Agency received three
comments and one question on the
NPRM.
The Commercial Vehicle Safety
Alliance, Advocates for Highway and
Auto Safety (Advocates), and the
American Trucking Associations
submitted comments supporting the
direct final rule procedures that were
proposed in the NPRM. Advocates
additionally stated that FMCSA should
not use direct final rule procedures on
safety-related rules, as these rules
should be considered controversial and
subject to full public notice and
comment proceedings. They further
maintain that FMCSA’s granting of
applications for waivers and two-year
exemptions, under 49 U.S.C. 31315(a)
and (b), and the renewal of such
exemptions, should always be treated as
controversial and subject to full public
notice and comment procedures. As
stated in the NPRM, FMCSA will use
the direct final rule process for routine
and noncontroversial rules. In the event
that FMCSA publishes a direct final rule
on an action that proves to be
controversial, the public will have
sufficient time and opportunity to
submit adverse comments, or submit
notices of intent to file adverse
comments by the date specified in the
direct final rule. If this occurs, FMCSA
will publish a notice in the Federal
Register withdrawing the direct final
rule before it goes into effect.
Arkema Incorporated inquired about
the number of days FMCSA is
considering for a direct final rule to
become effective after the date of
publication in the Federal Register. As
FMCSA intends to use the direct final
rule process for routine and
noncontroversial rules, the Agency will
typically use 60 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register for
the direct final rule to go into effect and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
30 days after the date of publication in
the Federal Register for the submission
of adverse comments or notices of intent
to submit adverse comments. FMCSA
has the discretion to use a longer time
period for a direct final rule to go into
effect and a longer period for the
submission of adverse comments if the
Agency determines that it is necessary.
If FMCSA receives adverse comments,
or receives notice of intent to file
adverse comments by the date specified
in the direct final rule, it will publish
a notice in the Federal Register
withdrawing the direct final rule before
it goes into effect.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FMCSA has determined that this
action is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866 or
under DOT’s Regulatory Policies and
Procedures. There are no costs
associated with the final rule. There will
be some cost savings in Federal Register
publication costs and may be savings in
efficiencies for the public and FMCSA
personnel in eliminating duplicative
reviews. I certify that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Finally, FMCSA states that there are no
Federalism implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking contains no
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
FMCSA has determined that the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Act of 1995 do not apply to
this final rule.
Environment
FMCSA considered the environmental
impacts of this final rule under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, and determined it is categorically
excluded from further environmental
analysis under FMCSA Order 5610.1
paragraph 6.x of Appendix 2. FMCSA
Order 5610.1 was published on March
1, 2004 (69 FR 9680). A Categorical
Exclusion Determination is available for
inspection or copying in the
regulations.gov Web site listed under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 389
Rulemaking procedures.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, FMCSA amends 49 CFR Part
389 as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 389—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR
part 389 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 113, 501 et seq.,
subchapters I and III of chapter 311, chapter
313, and 31502; 42 U.S.C 4917; and 49 CFR
1.73
2. Section 389.11 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 389.11
General.
Except as provided in § 389.39, Direct
final rulemaking procedures, unless the
Administrator, for good cause, finds a
rule is impractical, unnecessary, or
contrary to the public interest, and
incorporates such a finding and a brief
statement for the reason for it in the
rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking
must be issued, and interested persons
are invited to participate in the
rulemaking proceedings involving rules
under an Act.
3. Add new § 389.39 to read as
follows:
■
§ 389.39 Direct final rulemaking
procedures
A direct final rule makes regulatory
changes and states that those changes
will take effect on a specified date
unless FMCSA receives an adverse
comment or notice of intent to file an
adverse comment by the date specified
in the direct final rule published in the
Federal Register.
(a) Types of actions appropriate for
direct final rulemaking. Rules that the
Administrator determines to be noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse public comments may be
published in the final rule section of the
Federal Register as direct final rules.
These include non-controversial rules
that:
(1) Make non-substantive
clarifications or corrections to existing
rules;
(2) Incorporate by reference the latest
or otherwise updated versions of
technical or industry standards;
(3) Affect internal FMCSA procedures
such as filing requirements and rules
governing inspection and copying of
documents;
(4) Update existing forms; and
(5) Make minor changes to rules
regarding statistics and reporting
requirements, such as a change in
reporting period (for example, from
quarterly to annually) or eliminating a
type of data collection no longer
necessary.
(b) Adverse comment. An adverse
comment is a comment that FMCSA
judges to be critical of the rule, to
suggest that the rule should not be
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Rules and Regulations
adopted, or to suggest that a change
should be made to the rule. Under the
direct final rule process, FMCSA does
not consider the following types of
comments to be adverse:
(1) Comments recommending another
rule change, unless the commenter
states that the direct final rule will be
ineffective without the change;
(2) Comments outside the scope of the
rule and comments suggesting that the
rule’s policy or requirements should or
should not be extended to other Agency
programs outside the scope of the rule;
(3) Comments in support of the rule;
or
(4) Comments requesting clarification.
(c) Confirmation of effective date.
FMCSA will publish a confirmation rule
document in the Federal Register, if it
has not received an adverse comment or
notice of intent to file an adverse
comment by the date specified in the
direct final rule. The confirmation rule
document tells the public the effective
date of the rule.
(d) Withdrawal of a direct final rule.
(1) If FMCSA receives an adverse
comment or a notice of intent to file an
adverse comment within the comment
period, it will publish a rule document
in the Federal Register, before the
effective date of the direct final rule,
advising the public and withdrawing
the direct final rule.
(2) If FMCSA withdraws a direct final
rule because of an adverse comment, the
Agency may issue a notice of proposed
rulemaking if it decides to pursue the
rulemaking.
Issued on: May 24, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010–12834 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 21
[FWS–R9–MB–2010–0020; 91200–1231–
9BPP]
RIN 1018–AX09
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with RULES
Migratory Bird Permits; Changes in the
Regulations Governing Migratory Bird
Rehabilitation
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
15:16 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Background
On October 27, 2003, we published a
final rule in the Federal Register (68 FR
61123) to establish regulations for the
issuance of permits to rehabilitate
migratory birds in the United States.
These regulations are at 50 CFR 21.31.
Prior to issuance of the rehabilitation
permit rule, migratory bird
rehabilitators were required to obtain a
special use permit to engage in
rehabilitation activities. The last
paragraph in the rehabilitation permit
rule dealt with how we would handle
issuing permits during the transition to
the (then) new regulations. Since
publication of that rule, all persons
interested in having a permit to
rehabilitate migratory birds must have
transitioned from a special purpose
permit to a rehabilitation permit.
Because special purpose permits are
valid for only 3 years, all of those
permits in existence in 2003 have
expired by now.
Therefore, the text in 50 CFR 21.31(i),
‘‘Will I need to apply for a new permit
under this section if I already have a
special purpose permit to rehabilitate
birds, issued under § 21.27 (Special
purpose permits)?’’ is no longer needed.
With this final rule, our only change to
the rehabilitation regulations is to
remove all of the language under
paragraph (i). This change is simply a
ministerial administrative action to
remove text that is no longer necessary
from the Code of Federal Regulations
and, therefore, will have no substantive
effect on the general public.
Administrative Procedure
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, published a final rule
in the Federal Register on October 27,
2003, to create regulations governing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
migratory bird rehabilitation in the
United States. Before creation of those
regulations, rehabilitators were required
to obtain a special purpose permit to
engage in rehabilitation activities. The
language in the final paragraph of the
2003 regulations dealt with the
transition of special purpose permit
holders to operation under the new
rehabilitation permit regulations. This
paragraph is no longer relevant, so we
remove it from the regulation.
DATES: This regulations change will be
effective on May 28, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
George T. Allen, Division of Migratory
Bird Management, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 703–358–1825.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In accordance with section 553
(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), we
are issuing this final rule without prior
opportunity for public comment
because public notice and comment
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29917
procedures are unnecessary. We find
that good cause exists to delete
paragraph (i) of section 21.31 without
going through the public-notice-andcomment procedure because the
transition language is anachronistic and
no public input received through an
open comment period could justify
retention of this paragraph. For the same
reasons stated above, we find that there
is good cause to have this final rule take
effect immediately upon publication in
the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant under Executive Order
12866. OMB bases its determination
upon the following four criteria:
a. Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
b. Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other Federal
agencies’ actions.
c. Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
d. Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.)
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) of 1996 (Pub. L.
104–121)), whenever an agency is
required to publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (that
is, small businesses, small
organizations, and small government
jurisdictions). However, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required if the
head of an agency certifies the rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities.
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
agencies to provide the statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. We have examined this rule’s
potential effects on small entities as
required by the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, and have determined that this
E:\FR\FM\28MYR1.SGM
28MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29915-29917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12834]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 389
[Docket No. FMCSA-2009-0354]
RIN 2126-AB23
Direct Final Rulemaking Procedures
AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: FMCSA amends its regulations by establishing direct final
rulemaking procedures for use on routine or noncontroversial rules.
Under these procedures, FMCSA will make regulatory changes that will
become effective a specified number of days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register, unless FMCSA receives written
adverse comment(s) or written notice of intent to submit adverse
comment(s) by the date specified in the direct final rule. These new
procedures will expedite the promulgation of routine or
noncontroversial rules by reducing the time and resources necessary to
develop, review, clear, and publish separate proposed and final rules.
FMCSA will not use the direct final rule procedures for complex or
controversial issues.
DATES: Effective Date: May 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents including those referenced in this document, or to read
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov by searching Docket
ID number FMCSA 2009-0354 at any time or to the ground floor, room W12-
140, DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form for all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review U.S.
Department of Transportation's (DOT) complete Privacy Act Statement in
the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19476) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bivan R. Patnaik, Chief,
Regulatory Development Division, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
(202) 366-8092.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) specifically
provides that notice and comment rulemaking procedures are not required
where the Agency determines that there is good cause to dispense with
them. Generally, good cause exists where the procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). FMCSA proposes to use direct final rulemaking to
streamline the rulemaking process where the rule is noncontroversial
and the Agency does not expect adverse comment.
Direct final rulemaking will make more efficient use of FMCSA
resources by reducing the time and resources necessary to develop,
review, clear, and publish separate proposed and final rules for rules
the Agency expects to be noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse public comment. A number of Federal agencies use this process,
including various Department of Transportation operating
administrations. For example, on January 30, 2004, the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation published a final rule adopting direct
final rule procedures (69 FR 4455) and the Federal Railroad
Administration published a final rule adopting direct final rule
[[Page 29916]]
procedures on March 7, 2007 (72 FR 10086).
Direct Final Rule Procedures Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
FMCSA proposed direct final rulemaking procedures in an NPRM
published on March 17, 2010, in the Federal Register (75 FR 12720). The
NPRM described the process of how FMCSA will determine whether a
particular rulemaking is noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse comments. The NPRM also described how FMCSA determines whether
a comment is adverse or not.
Discussion of Comments Received on the NPRM
FMCSA provided a 30-day comment period that ended on April 16,
2010. In response, the Agency received three comments and one question
on the NPRM.
The Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, Advocates for Highway and
Auto Safety (Advocates), and the American Trucking Associations
submitted comments supporting the direct final rule procedures that
were proposed in the NPRM. Advocates additionally stated that FMCSA
should not use direct final rule procedures on safety-related rules, as
these rules should be considered controversial and subject to full
public notice and comment proceedings. They further maintain that
FMCSA's granting of applications for waivers and two-year exemptions,
under 49 U.S.C. 31315(a) and (b), and the renewal of such exemptions,
should always be treated as controversial and subject to full public
notice and comment procedures. As stated in the NPRM, FMCSA will use
the direct final rule process for routine and noncontroversial rules.
In the event that FMCSA publishes a direct final rule on an action that
proves to be controversial, the public will have sufficient time and
opportunity to submit adverse comments, or submit notices of intent to
file adverse comments by the date specified in the direct final rule.
If this occurs, FMCSA will publish a notice in the Federal Register
withdrawing the direct final rule before it goes into effect.
Arkema Incorporated inquired about the number of days FMCSA is
considering for a direct final rule to become effective after the date
of publication in the Federal Register. As FMCSA intends to use the
direct final rule process for routine and noncontroversial rules, the
Agency will typically use 60 days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register for the direct final rule to go into effect and 30
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register for the
submission of adverse comments or notices of intent to submit adverse
comments. FMCSA has the discretion to use a longer time period for a
direct final rule to go into effect and a longer period for the
submission of adverse comments if the Agency determines that it is
necessary. If FMCSA receives adverse comments, or receives notice of
intent to file adverse comments by the date specified in the direct
final rule, it will publish a notice in the Federal Register
withdrawing the direct final rule before it goes into effect.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
FMCSA has determined that this action is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 or under DOT's Regulatory
Policies and Procedures. There are no costs associated with the final
rule. There will be some cost savings in Federal Register publication
costs and may be savings in efficiencies for the public and FMCSA
personnel in eliminating duplicative reviews. I certify that this rule
will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Finally, FMCSA states that there are no Federalism
implications.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking contains no information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
FMCSA has determined that the requirements of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995 do not apply to this final rule.
Environment
FMCSA considered the environmental impacts of this final rule under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and determined it is
categorically excluded from further environmental analysis under FMCSA
Order 5610.1 paragraph 6.x of Appendix 2. FMCSA Order 5610.1 was
published on March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680). A Categorical Exclusion
Determination is available for inspection or copying in the
regulations.gov Web site listed under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 389
Rulemaking procedures.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, FMCSA amends 49 CFR Part 389
as follows:
PART 389--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 49 CFR part 389 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 113, 501 et seq., subchapters I and III of
chapter 311, chapter 313, and 31502; 42 U.S.C 4917; and 49 CFR 1.73
0
2. Section 389.11 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 389.11 General.
Except as provided in Sec. 389.39, Direct final rulemaking
procedures, unless the Administrator, for good cause, finds a rule is
impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and
incorporates such a finding and a brief statement for the reason for it
in the rule, a notice of proposed rulemaking must be issued, and
interested persons are invited to participate in the rulemaking
proceedings involving rules under an Act.
0
3. Add new Sec. 389.39 to read as follows:
Sec. 389.39 Direct final rulemaking procedures
A direct final rule makes regulatory changes and states that those
changes will take effect on a specified date unless FMCSA receives an
adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse comment by the
date specified in the direct final rule published in the Federal
Register.
(a) Types of actions appropriate for direct final rulemaking. Rules
that the Administrator determines to be non-controversial and unlikely
to result in adverse public comments may be published in the final rule
section of the Federal Register as direct final rules. These include
non-controversial rules that:
(1) Make non-substantive clarifications or corrections to existing
rules;
(2) Incorporate by reference the latest or otherwise updated
versions of technical or industry standards;
(3) Affect internal FMCSA procedures such as filing requirements
and rules governing inspection and copying of documents;
(4) Update existing forms; and
(5) Make minor changes to rules regarding statistics and reporting
requirements, such as a change in reporting period (for example, from
quarterly to annually) or eliminating a type of data collection no
longer necessary.
(b) Adverse comment. An adverse comment is a comment that FMCSA
judges to be critical of the rule, to suggest that the rule should not
be
[[Page 29917]]
adopted, or to suggest that a change should be made to the rule. Under
the direct final rule process, FMCSA does not consider the following
types of comments to be adverse:
(1) Comments recommending another rule change, unless the commenter
states that the direct final rule will be ineffective without the
change;
(2) Comments outside the scope of the rule and comments suggesting
that the rule's policy or requirements should or should not be extended
to other Agency programs outside the scope of the rule;
(3) Comments in support of the rule; or
(4) Comments requesting clarification.
(c) Confirmation of effective date. FMCSA will publish a
confirmation rule document in the Federal Register, if it has not
received an adverse comment or notice of intent to file an adverse
comment by the date specified in the direct final rule. The
confirmation rule document tells the public the effective date of the
rule.
(d) Withdrawal of a direct final rule.
(1) If FMCSA receives an adverse comment or a notice of intent to
file an adverse comment within the comment period, it will publish a
rule document in the Federal Register, before the effective date of the
direct final rule, advising the public and withdrawing the direct final
rule.
(2) If FMCSA withdraws a direct final rule because of an adverse
comment, the Agency may issue a notice of proposed rulemaking if it
decides to pursue the rulemaking.
Issued on: May 24, 2010.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-12834 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P