Value-Added Producer Grant Program, 29920-29932 [2010-12731]
Download as PDF
29920
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 75, No. 103
Friday, May 28, 2010
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1951 and 4284
RIN 0570–AA79
Value-Added Producer Grant Program
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative
Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008 (the Act), amends
section 231 of the Agricultural Risk
Protection Act of 2000, which
established the Value-Added Producer
Grant Program. This program will be
administered by the Rural BusinessCooperative Service. Under the
proposed program, grants will be made
to help eligible producers of agricultural
commodities enter into or expand valueadded activities including the
development of feasibility studies,
business plans, and marketing
strategies. The program will also
provide working capital for expenses
such as implementing an existing viable
marketing strategy. The Agency
proposes to implement the program to
meet the goals and requirements of the
Act.
The Agency is also proposing an
amendment to existing regulations that
would allow the delegation of the postaward servicing of the proposed
program to USDA State Office
personnel. Please note that this
amendment would only affect the postaward servicing of the grant and would
not affect the process for awarding
grants, which would still occur at the
National office.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received on or before June 28,
2010 to be assured of consideration. A
30-day comment period is provided for
interested persons to comment on the
regulatory provisions of this proposed
rule. The Agency has determined that a
30-day comment period, rather than the
traditional 60 day comment period, is
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
appropriate in order to provide a
sufficient amount of time to comment
while ensuring program performance
during the current fiscal year. This
action will also provide applicants more
time to develop quality applications for
the program with minimal disruptions
in ongoing farming activities.
The comment period for the
information collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
continues through July 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
electronically.
• Mail: Submit your written
comments via the U.S. Postal Service to
the Branch Chief, Regulations and
Paperwork Management Branch, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Stop 0742,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
your written comments via Federal
Express mail, or other courier service
requiring a street address, to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street,
SW, 7th Floor address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Jermolowicz USDA, Rural
Development, Rural BusinessCooperative Service, Room 4016, South
Agriculture Building, Stop 3250, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–3250,
Telephone: (202) 720–7558, E-mail
CPGrants@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory Authority
Section 231 of the Agriculture Risk
Protection Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–224)
as amended by section 6202 of the Food,
Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
(Pub. L. 110–246) (see 7 U.S.C. 1621
note) authorizes the establishment of the
Value-Added Agricultural Product
Market Development grants, also known
as Value-Added Producer Grants. The
Secretary of Agriculture has delegated
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the program’s administration to USDA
Rural Development Cooperative
Programs.
B. Nature of the Program
This subpart contains the provisions
and procedures by which the Agency
will administer the Value-Added
Producer Grant (VAPG) Program. The
primary objective of this grant program
is to help Independent Producers of
Agricultural Commodities, Agriculture
Producer Groups, Farmer and Rancher
Cooperatives, and Majority-Controlled
Producer-Based Business Ventures
develop strategies to create marketing
opportunities and to help develop
Business Plans for viable marketing
opportunities regarding production of
bio-based products from agricultural
commodities. As with all value-added
efforts, generating new products,
creating expanded marketing
opportunities, and increasing producer
income are the end goal.
Eligible applicants are independent
agricultural producers, farmer and
rancher cooperatives, agricultural
producer groups, and majoritycontrolled producer-based business
ventures.
Grant funds cannot be used for
planning, repairing, rehabilitating,
acquiring, or constructing a building or
facility (including a processing facility).
They also cannot be used to purchase,
rent, or install fixed equipment.
This program requires matching funds
equal to or greater than the amount of
grant funds requested. The Act provides
for both mandatory and discretionary
funding for the program, as may be
appropriated. During subsequent years,
additional funding may be appropriated.
The number of grants awarded will vary
from year to year, based on availability
of funds and the quality of applications.
The maximum grant amount that may
be awarded is $500,000. However, the
Agency may reduce that amount
depending on the total funds
appropriated for the program in a given
fiscal year. This policy allows more
grants to be awarded under reduced
funding.
The Agency notes, pursuant to general
Federal directives providing guidance
on grant usage, that the 100 percent
matching funds requirement described
in the Agricultural Risk Protection Act
of 2000 may include payment for the
time of the applicant/producer or the
applicant/producer’s family members
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
only for the production of the business
and marketing plans. Please contact the
state office for further information.
II. Request for Public Comments on
Specific Aspects of the Proposed
Program
The Agency is interested in receiving
comments on all aspects of the proposed
rule. Areas in which the Agency is
seeking specific comments are
identified below. All comments should
be submitted as indicated in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
a. Medium-sized farm. As proposed,
medium-sized farm is defined as ‘‘A
farm or ranch that has averaged between
$250,001 and $700,000 in annual gross
sales of agricultural products in the
previous three years.’’ The Agency is
specifically requesting comment on
whether it is more appropriate to use
$500,000 as the upper limit in this
definition. Please be sure to provide
rationale for your position.
b. Branding activities. The Agency is
proposing to allow branding, packaging,
or other product differentiation
activities that are not more than 25
percent of the total project cost of a
value-added project for products
otherwise eligible in one of the five
value-added methodologies specified in
paragraphs (1)(i) through (v) of the
definition of value-added agricultural
product to be eligible. The Agency is
seeking specific comment on the
proposed 25 percent limit. If you believe
a different limit is more appropriate,
please identify your suggested limit and
provide your rationale to support your
suggestion.
III. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The following paragraphs present a
discussion of provisions of each section
of the proposed rule in the order that
they appear.
A. Purpose (§ 4284.901)
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
This section implements the valueadded agricultural product market
development grant program
administered by the Rural BusinessCooperative Service whereby grants are
made to enable producers to develop
businesses that produce and market
value-added agricultural products.
B. Definitions (§ 4284.902)
This section presents program specific
definitions which are included to more
clearly implement the program.
C. Review or Appeal Rights (§ 4284.903)
This section addresses how a person
may seek a review of an Agency
decision or file an appeal.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
D. Exception Authority (§ 4284.904)
This section explains the
Administrator’s authority to make
exceptions to regulatory requirements or
provisions and specifically excludes
permission to make exceptions for:
• Applicant eligibility
• Project eligibility
The Agency believes that applicant
and project eligibility criteria must be
maintained at all times in order to be
consistent with statutory authority.
E. Nondiscrimination and Compliance
With Other Federal Laws (§ 4284.905)
This section explains that applicants
must comply with all applicable Federal
laws. Additionally, this section explains
how an applicant that believes it has
been discriminated against as a result of
applying for funds under this program
can file a Civil Rights complaint with
the USDA Office of Adjudication and
Compliance.
F. State Laws, Local Laws, Regulatory
Commission Regulations (§ 4284.906)
This section addresses how conflicts
between this subpart and State or local
laws, or regulatory commission
regulations will be resolved.
G. Environmental Requirements
(§ 4284.907)
This section addresses the
relationship between grants awarded
under this subpart and the
environmental requirements of subpart
G of 7 CFR part 1940.
H. Incorporation by Reference
(§ 4284.908)
This section identifies the various
regulations that are incorporated by
reference in this subpart.
I. Forms, Regulations, and Instructions
(§ 4284.909)
This section identifies how forms,
regulations, instructions and other
materials related to programs may be
obtained.
J. Notifications (§ 4284.915)
This section describes the methods
the Agency will use in making
notifications regarding funding and
programmatic changes.
K. Applicant Eligibility (§ 4284.920)
This section describes the
requirements an applicant must meet to
be eligible for a grant under this subpart,
including, but not limited to, such areas
as citizenship, legal authority, and
multiple grants. An applicant must
demonstrate that they meet all
definition requirements for one of the
following applicant types:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29921
• An independent producer;
• An agricultural producer group;
• A farmer or rancher cooperative; or
• A majority-controlled producerbased business venture.
L. Ineligible Applicants (§ 4284.921)
This section describes those
conditions under which an applicant
will be considered ineligible to
participate in this program.
M. Project Eligibility (§ 4284.922)
The eligibility requirements
applicable to this subpart are described
in this section. For a product to be
eligible it must meet the definition of a
value-added agricultural product. The
applicant must also demonstrate that, as
a result of the project, the customer base
for the agricultural commodity or
product is expanded, and that a greater
portion of the revenue derived from the
marketing or processing of the valueadded product is available to the
agricultural producer of the commodity
or product.
Other aspects of project eligibility
discussed in this section include, but
are not limited to, availability of
matching funds, submittal of various
items such as work plans, budgets,
feasibility studies, and business plans,
and how applications that include
branding and packaging will be
handled.
N. Eligible Uses of Grant Funds
(§ 4284.923)
The section identifies the eligible uses
of grant and matching funds for both
planning funds and working capital
funds, and requires that grant and
matching funds meet the same use
restrictions, including being used to
fund only the costs for approved
purposes.
O. Ineligible Uses of Grant and
Matching Funds (§ 4284.924)
This section describes those activities
for which Agency funds under this
subpart may not be used. Ineligible uses
include expenses related to payment for
preparation of the grant application and
any activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts
3015 and 3019, 2 CFR part 230, and 48
CFR part 31. Expenses related to the
production of any agricultural
commodity or product, including seed,
rootstock, labor for harvesting the crop,
and delivery of the commodity to a
processing facility are not eligible. Any
costs of the project incurred prior to the
date of grant approval, including legal
or other expenses needed to incorporate
or organize a business, are ineligible.
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
29922
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
P. Funding Limitations (§ 4284.925)
This section describes the maximum
grant fund amount that a grant recipient
can receive ($500,000) and several grant
terms, including, but not limited to, the
portion of total project eligible costs that
grant funds can be used to pay (up to
50%) and the term of a grant (not to
exceed 3 years).
received. Applications will be scored
based on the information provided and/
or referenced in the scoring section of
the application at the time the applicant
submits the application to the Agency.
The maximum number of points that
may be awarded to an application is
100, based on the criteria specified in
this section.
Q. Preliminary Review (§ 4284.930)
This section encourages applicants to
contact their State Office before they
submit their applications.
X. Award Process (§ 4284.950)
This section describes the process by
which the Agency will select
applications for funding. Funding will
be based on the score an application has
received compared to the scores of other
applications. Higher scoring
applications will receive first
consideration for funding. The Agency
will notify in writing applicants whose
applications have been selected for
funding as well as inform those who did
not receive funding, including a brief
explanation as to why.
R. Application Package (§ 4284.931)
The application forms, content,
evaluation criteria, verifications and
certifications required in the application
package are detailed in this section.
S. Siplified Application (§ 4284.932)
This section addresses simplified
applications, which are applicable to
applicants requesting less than $50,000.
T. Filing Instructions (§ 4284.933)
This section provides the instructions
for filing an application with the
Agency. Completed applications must
be received on or before March 15 of
each year to be considered for funding
that fiscal year. Late and/or incomplete
applications will not be considered.
Included in this section is information
on where to submit and the format
required for submission.
U. Processing Applications (§ 4284.940)
This section explains the process by
which the Agency will conduct an
application review to determine if the
application is complete and meets
program requirements. After review, the
Agency will notify applicants in writing
of their findings. Applicants determined
to be ineligible may revise and resubmit
their applications to the Agency on or
before the application deadline.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Application Withdrawal (§ 4284.941)
This section describes the process
whereby an applicant must notify the
Agency in writing of its intention to
withdraw its application for assistance.
W. Scoring Applications (§ 4284.942)
This section describes the process and
criteria the Agency will use to score
applications. The Agency will only
score applications for which it has
determined that the applicant and
project are eligible and that the
application is complete and sufficiently
responsive to program requirements.
Each such application the Agency
receives on or before the application
deadline in a fiscal year will be scored
in the fiscal year in which it was
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Y. Grant Agreement (§ 4284.951)
This section describes the conditions
under which the grant will be made to
the applicant. Each grantee will be
required to meet all terms and
conditions of the award within 90 days
of receiving the Letter of Conditions,
unless otherwise specified by the
Agency at the time of the award.
Z. Monitoring and Reporting Program
Performance (§ 4284.960)
The required monitoring and
reporting activities are described in this
section. Requirements include
semiannual performance reports which
must be submitted to the Agency within
30 days following March 31 and
September 30. Failure to submit timely
performance reports may result in the
Agency withholding grant funds.
AA. Grant Servicing (§ 4284.961)
This section states that all grants
awarded under this subpart will be
serviced pursuant to 7 CFR part 1951,
subparts E and O, and in Departmental
Regulations. Note that as a separate
action being proposed today, the
Agency is proposing an amendment to
§ 1951.215 of subpart E. Paragraph (b)(2)
in that section currently states that ‘‘All
other grants will be serviced in
accordance with the Grant Agreement
and this subpart. Prior approval of the
Administrator is required except for
actions covered in the preceding
paragraph.’’ The Agency is proposing to
amend this paragraph by deleting the
second sentence. This proposed
amendment would facilitate the
delegation of the servicing of the
proposed program, and other grant
programs that use part 1951 as their
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
servicing regulation, to USDA State
Office personnel. As noted earlier, the
awarding of grants will occur at the
National office.
BB. Transfer of Obligations (§ 4284.962)
This section explains those
circumstances under which an
obligation of funds established for an
applicant may be transferred to a
different (substituted) applicant.
CC. Grant Close out and Related
Activities (§ 4284.963)
This section addresses the
requirements for conducting grant close
out and other related activities.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order (EO) 12866 and
has been determined not significant by
the Office of Management and Budget.
The EO defines a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as one that is likely to result in
a rule that may: (1) Have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more or adversely affect, in a material
way, the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) create
a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfere with an action taken or
planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this EO.
The Agency conducted a cost-benefit
analysis to fulfill the requirements of
Executive Order 12866. The Agency has
identified potential benefits to
prospective program participants and
the Agency that are associated with
improving the availability of funds to
help producers (farmers) expand their
customer base for the products or
commodities that they produce. This
results in a greater portion of the
revenues derived from the value-added
activity being made available to the
producer of the product. These benefits
are important to the success of
individual producers, farmer or rancher
cooperatives, agriculture producer
groups, and majority-controlled
producer based business ventures.
B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
Rural Development must prepare, to the
extent practicable, a written statement,
including a cost-benefit analysis, for
proposed and final rules with ‘‘Federal
mandates’’ that may result in
expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any one year. With certain
exceptions, section 205 of UMRA
requires Rural Development to identify
and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no
Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for
State, local, and tribal governments or
the private sector. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the UMRA.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in
accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ‘‘Environmental Program.’’
Rural Development has determined that
this action does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment and,
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
D. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. Except where
specified, all State and local laws and
regulations that are in direct conflict
with this rule will be preempted.
Federal funds carry Federal
requirements. No person is required to
apply for funding under this program,
but if they do apply and are selected for
funding, they must comply with the
requirements applicable to the Federal
program funds. This rule is not
retroactive. It will not affect agreements
entered into prior to the effective date
of the rule. Before any judicial action
may be brought regarding the provisions
of this rule, the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780
must be exhausted.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
It has been determined, under
Executive Order 13132, Federalism, that
this proposed rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment. The provisions contained
in the proposed rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on States or
their political subdivisions or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
government levels.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–602) generally requires an
agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute. If an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
this analysis is not required. Small
entities include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
In compliance with the RFA, Rural
Development has determined that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the reasons
discussed below. While, the majority of
producers of agricultural commodities
expected to participate in this Program
will be small businesses, the average
cost to participants is estimated to be
approximately 20 percent of the total
mandatory funding available to the
program in fiscal years 2009 through
2012. Further, this regulation only
affects producers that choose to
participate in the program. Lastly, small
entity applicants will not be affected to
a greater extent than large entity
applicants.
G. Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs
This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
Intergovernmental consultation will
occur for the assistance to producers of
agricultural commodities in accordance
with the process and procedures
outlined in 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.
Rural Development will conduct
intergovernmental consultation using
RD Instruction 1940–J,
‘‘Intergovernmental Review of Rural
Development Programs and Activities,’’
available in any Rural Development
office, on the Internet at https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/regs, and in 7
CFR part 3015, subpart V. Note that not
all States have chosen to participate in
the intergovernmental review process. A
list of participating States is available at
the following Web site: https://
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29923
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/
spoc.html.
H. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This executive order imposes
requirements on Rural Development in
the development of regulatory policies
that have tribal implications or preempt
tribal laws. Rural Development has
determined that the proposed rule does
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribe(s) or on either
the relationship or the distribution of
powers and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and the Indian
tribes. Thus, the proposed rule is not
subject to the requirements of Executive
Order 13175.
I. Programs Affected
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) Number: This
program is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under
Number 10.352.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
requirements contained in this proposed
rule have been submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
clearance. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
USDA Rural Development will seek
standard OMB approval of the reporting
requirements contained in this proposed
rule and hereby opens a 60-day public
comment period.
Title: Value-Added Producer Grant
Program.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The collection of
information is vital to Rural
Development to make decisions
regarding the eligibility of grant
recipients in order to ensure compliance
with the regulations and to ensure that
the funds obtained from the
Government are being used for the
purposes for which they were awarded.
Entities seeking funding under this
program will have to submit
applications that include information on
the entity’s eligibility, information on
each of the evaluation criteria,
certification of matching funds,
verification of cost-share matching
funds, business plan, and feasibility
study. This information will be used to
determine applicant eligibility and to
ensure that funds are used for
authorized purposes.
Once an entity has been approved and
their application accepted for funding,
the entity would be required to sign a
Letter of Conditions and a grant
agreement. The grant agreement outlines
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
29924
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
the approved use of funds and actions,
as well as the restrictions and applicable
laws and regulations that apply to the
award. Grantees must maintain a
financial system and, in accordance
with Departmental regulations, property
and procurement standards. Grantees
must submit semi-annual financial
performance reports that include a
comparison of accomplishments with
the objectives stated in the application
and a final performance report. Finally,
grantees must provide copies of
supporting documentation and/or
project deliverables for completed tasks
(e.g., feasibility studies, business plans,
marketing plans, success stories, best
practices).
The following estimates are based on
the anticipated average over the first
three years the program is in place:
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
for this collection of information is
estimated to average 34.1 hours per
response.
Respondents: Producers of
agricultural commodities.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
535.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 3.3.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,783.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
(hours) on Respondents: 60,724.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Cheryl Thompson,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch at (202) 692–0043.
Comments
Comments are invited regarding: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of Rural
Development, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of Rural Development’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to Cheryl
Thompson, Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, Support Services
Division, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Rural Development, Stop
0742, 1400 Independence Ave., SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742. All
responses to this proposed rule will be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
K. E-Government Act Compliance
USDA is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107–347, December 17, 2002),
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to government
information and services, and for other
purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 1951 and
4284
Agricultural commodities,
agricultural products, grant programs,
rural areas, rural development, valueadded activities.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, parts 1951 and 4284 of title
7 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1951—SERVICING AND
COLLECTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 1951
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932
Note; 7 U.S.C. 1989; 31 U.S.C. 3716; 42
U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart E—Servicing of Community
and Direct Business Programs Loans
and Grants
2. Section 1951.215 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2) to read as
follows:
§ 1951.215
Grants.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) All other grants will be serviced in
accordance with the Grant Agreement
and this subpart.
PART 4284—GRANTS
3. The authority citation for part 4284
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989
4. Part 4284 is amended by revising
subpart J to read as follows:
Subpart J—Value-Added Producer Grant
Program
Section A—General
Sec.
4284.901 Purpose.
4284.902 Definitions.
4284.903 Review or appeal rights.
4284.904 Exception authority.
4284.905 Nondiscrimination and
compliance with other Federal laws.
4284.906 State laws, local laws, regulatory
commission regulations.
4284.907 Environmental requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4284.908 Incorporation by reference.
4284.909 Forms, regulations, and
instructions.
4284.910—4284.914 [Reserved]
Section B—Funding and Programmatic
Change Notifications
4284.915 Notifications.
4284.916—4284.919 [Reserved]
Section C—Eligibility
4284.920 Applicant eligibility.
4284.921 Ineligible applicants.
4284.922 Project eligibility.
4284.923 Eligible uses of grant funds.
4284.924 Ineligible uses of grant and
matching funds.
4284.925 Funding limitations.
4284.926—4284.929 [Reserved]
Section D—Applying for a Grant
4284.930 Preliminary review.
4284.931 Applications.
4284.932 Simplified applications.
4284.933 Filing instructions.
4284.934—4284.939 [Reserved]
Section E—Processing and Scoring
Applications
4284.940 Processing applications.
4284.941 Application withdrawal.
4284.942 Scoring applications.
4284.943—4284.949 [Reserved]
Section F—Grant Awards and Agreement
4284.950 Award process.
4284.951 Grant agreement.
4284.952—4284.959 [Reserved]
Section G—Post Award Activities and
Requirements
4284.960 Monitoring and reporting program
performance.
4284.961 Grant servicing.
4284.962 Transfer of obligations.
4284.963 Grant close out and related
activities.
4284.964—4284.999 [Reserved]
Section A—General
§ 4284.901
Purpose.
This subpart implements the valueadded agricultural product market
development grant program (ValueAdded Producer Grants) administered
by the Rural Business-Cooperative
Service whereby grants are made to
enable producers to develop businesses
that produce and market value-added
agricultural products.
§ 4284.902
Definitions.
Administrator. The Administrator of
the Rural Business-Cooperative Service
or designees or successors.
Agency. The Rural Business–
Cooperative Service or successor for the
programs it administers.
Agricultural commodity. An
unprocessed product of farms, ranches,
nurseries, and forests and natural and
man-made bodies of water to which the
producer has legal access. Agricultural
commodities include any product
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
cultivated, raised, or harvested by the
producer. Agricultural commodities do
not include horses or other animals
raised or sold as pets, such as cats, dogs,
and ferrets.
Agricultural producer. An individual
or entity directly engaged in the
production of an agricultural
commodity that is the subject of the
value-added project.
Agricultural producer group. A
membership organization that
represents independent producers and
whose mission includes working on
behalf of independent producers and
the majority of whose membership and
board of directors is comprised of
independent producers.
Agricultural product. Plant and
animal products and their by-products
to include crops (including farming);
livestock (including ranching); forestry
products; hydroponics; nursery stock;
aquaculture; and fish and seafood
products.
Anticipated award date. A date when
the Agency expects to announce
applications selected to receive grant
funding.
Beginning farmer or rancher. This
term has the meaning given it in section
343(a) of the Consolidated Farm and
Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.
1991(a)) and is an entity in which none
of the individual owners have operated
a farm or a ranch for more than 10 years.
For the purposes of this subpart, a
Beginning Farmer or Rancher must
currently own and produce the
agricultural commodity to which value
will be added.
Business plan. A formal statement of
a set of business goals, the reasons why
they are believed attainable, and the
plan for reaching those goals, including
pro forma financial statements
appropriate to the term and scope of the
project and sufficient to evidence the
viability of the venture. It may also
contain background information about
the organization or team attempting to
reach those goals.
Conflict of interest. A situation in
which a person or entity has competing
professional or personal interests that
make it difficult for the person or
business to act impartially. An example
is a grant recipient or an employee of a
recipient that conducts or significantly
participates in conducting a feasibility
study for the recipient.
Day. Calendar day, unless otherwise
stated.
Departmental regulations. The
regulations of the Department of
Agriculture’s Office of Chief Financial
Officer (or successor office) as codified
in 7 CFR parts 3000 through 3099,
including, but not necessarily limited
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
to, 7 CFR parts 3015 through 3019, 7
CFR part 3021, and 7 CFR part 3052,
and successor regulations to these parts.
Emerging market. A new or
developing product that is new to the
applicant or the applicant’s product.
Family Farm. The term has the
meaning given it in section 761.2 of title
7, Code of Federal Regulations (as in
effect on December 30, 2007), in effect
that, a Family Farm produces
agricultural commodities for sale in
sufficient quantity to be recognized as a
farm and not a rural residence, owners
are primarily responsible for daily
physical labor and management, hired
help only supplements family labor, and
owners are related by blood or marriage
or are immediate family.
Farm or ranch. Any place from which
$1,000 or more of agricultural products
were raised and sold or would have
been raised and sold during the
previous year, but for an event beyond
the control of the farmer or rancher.
Farmer or rancher cooperative. A
business owned and controlled by
agricultural producers that is
incorporated, or otherwise identified by
the state in which it operates, as a
cooperatively operated business.
Feasibility study. An analysis by a
qualified consultant of the economic,
market, technical, financial, and
management capabilities of a proposed
project or business in terms of the
project’s expectation for success.
Financial feasibility. The ability of a
project or business to achieve the
income, credit, and cash flows to
financially sustain a venture over the
long term.
Fiscal year. The Federal government’s
fiscal year.
Immediate family. Individuals who
are closely related by blood, marriage, or
adoption, or live within the same
household, such as a spouse, domestic
partner, parent, child, brother, sister,
aunt, uncle, grandparent, grandchild,
niece, or nephew.
Independent producers.
(1) Individual agricultural producers
or entities that are solely owned or
controlled by agricultural producers.
Independent producers must produce
and own a majority of the agricultural
commodity to which value is being
added and that is the subject of the
project proposal. Independent
producers must maintain ownership of
the agricultural commodity or product
from its raw state through the
production of the value-added product.
Producers who produce the agricultural
commodity under contract for another
entity, but do not own the product
produced are not considered
independent producers. Entities that
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29925
contract out the production of an
agricultural commodity are not
considered independent producers.
(2) A steering committee composed of
specifically identified agricultural
producers in the process of organizing
an eligible entity to operate a valueadded venture that will be owned or
controlled by those specifically
identified agricultural producers
supplying the agricultural product to
the market. The steering committee
must have formed the eligible entity by
the time of award.
Local or regional supply network. An
interconnected group of entities through
which agricultural based products move
from production through consumption
in a local or regional area of the United
States. Examples of participants in a
supply network may include
agricultural producers, processors,
distributors, wholesalers, retailers,
consumers, and entities that organize or
provide technical assistance for
development of such networks.
Locally-produced agricultural food
product. Any agricultural food product
that is raised, produced, and distributed
in:
(1) The locality or region in which the
final product is marketed, so that the
total distance that the product is
transported is less than 400 miles from
the origin of the product; or
(2) The State in which the product is
produced.
Majority-controlled producer-based
business venture. An entity (except
farmer or rancher cooperatives) in
which more than 50 percent of the
financial ownership and voting control
is held by independent producers.
Marketing plan. A plan for the project
conducted by a qualified consultant that
identifies a market window, potential
buyers, a description of the distribution
system and possible promotional
campaigns.
Matching funds. A cost-sharing
contribution to the project via
confirmed cash or funding
commitments from eligible sources
without a conflict of interest, that are
used for eligible project purposes during
the grant period. Eligible matching
funds include confirmed applicant cash,
loan or line of credit, non-Federal grant
sources (unless otherwise provided by
law), and third-party cash or eligible
third-party in-kind contributions.
Matching funds must be at least equal
to the grant amount, and combined
grant and matching funds must equal
100 percent of the total project costs. All
eligible cash and third-party in-kind
matching funds contributions must be
spent on eligible expenses during the
grant period, and are subject to the same
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
29926
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
use restrictions as grant funds. Matching
funds must be spent at a rate equal to
or greater than the rate at which grant
funds are expended, and if matching
funds are proposed in an amount
exceeding the grant amount, those
matching funds must be spent at a
proportional rate equaling the match-togrant ratio identified in the budget.
Expected program income may not be
used to fulfill the matching funds
requirement at time of application.
Further, funds used for an ineligible
purpose, contributions donated outside
the proposed grant period, and in-kind
contributions that are invalid, overvalued or include potential for a conflict
of interest are not acceptable matching
funds. All matching funds must be
verified by authentic documentation
from the source as part of the
application.
Medium-sized farm. A farm or ranch
that has averaged between $250,001 and
$700,000 in annual gross sales of
agricultural products in the previous
three years.
Mid-tier value chain. Local and
regional supply networks that link
independent producers with businesses
and cooperatives that market valueadded agricultural products in a manner
that:
(1) Targets and strengthens the
profitability and competitiveness of
small and medium-sized farms and
ranches that are structured as a family
farm; and
(2) Obtains agreement from an eligible
agricultural producer group, farmer or
rancher cooperative, or majoritycontrolled producer-based business
venture that is engaged in the value
chain on a marketing strategy.
(3) For mid-tier value chain projects
the Agency recognizes that, in a supply
chain network, a variety of raw
agricultural commodity and valueadded product ownership and transfer
arrangements may be necessary.
Consequently, applicant ownership of
the raw agricultural commodity and
value-added product from raw through
value-added is not necessarily required,
as long as the mid-tier value chain
proposal can demonstrate an increase in
customer base and an increase in
revenue returns to the applicant
producers supplying the majority of the
raw agricultural commodity for the
project.
Planning grant. A grant to facilitate
the development of a defined program
of economic planning activities to
determine the viability of a potential
value-added venture, and specifically
for the purpose of paying for a qualified
(third-party) consultant to conduct and
develop a feasibility study, business
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
plan, and/or marketing plan associated
with the processing and/or marketing of
a value-added agricultural product.
Product segregation. Separating an
agricultural commodity or product on
the same farm from other varieties of the
same commodity or product on the
same farm during production and
harvesting, with assurance of continued
separation from similar products during
processing and marketing in a manner
that results in the enhancement of the
value of the separated commodity or
product.
Pro forma financial statement. A
financial statement that projects the
future financial position of a company.
The statement is part of the business
plan and includes an explanation of all
assumptions, such as input prices,
finished product prices, and other
economic factors used to generate the
financial statements. The statement
must include projections in the form of
cash flow statements, income
statements, and balance sheets.
Project. All activities to be funded by
grant and matching funds.
Qualified consultant. An
independent, third-party possessing the
knowledge, expertise, and experience to
perform the specific task required in an
efficient, effective, and authoritative
manner.
Rural Development. A mission area of
the Under Secretary for Rural
Development within the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA),
which includes Rural Housing Service,
Rural Utilities Service, and Rural
Business-Cooperative Service and their
successors.
Rural or rural area. Any area of a
State not in a city or town that has a
population of more than 50,000
inhabitants, according to the latest
decennial census of the United States,
and the contiguous and adjacent
urbanized area, and any area that has
been determined to be ‘‘rural in
character’’ by the Under Secretary for
Rural Development, or as otherwise
identified in this definition. In
determining which census blocks in an
urbanized area are not in a rural area,
the Agency will exclude any cluster of
census blocks that would otherwise be
considered not in a Rural Area only
because the cluster is adjacent to not
more than two census blocks that are
otherwise considered not in a rural area
under this definition.
(1) For the purposes of this definition,
cities and towns are incorporated
population centers with definite
boundaries, local self government, and
legal powers set forth in a charter
granted by the State.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) For the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the island is considered rural and
eligible for Business Programs
assistance, except for the San Juan
Census Designated Place (CDP) and any
other CDP with greater than 50,000
inhabitants. CDPs with greater than
50,000 inhabitants, other than the San
Juan CDP, may be determined to be
eligible if they are ‘‘not urban in
character.’’ Any such requests must be
forwarded to the National Office,
Business and Industry Division, with
supporting documentation as to why the
area is ‘‘not urban in character’’ for
review, analysis, and decision by the
Rural Development Under Secretary.
(3) For the State of Hawaii, all areas
within the State are considered rural
and eligible for Business Programs
assistance, except for the Honolulu CDP
within the County of Honolulu.
(4) For the purpose of defining a rural
area in the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, and the
Republic of the Marshall Islands, the
Agency shall determine what
constitutes rural and rural area based on
available population data.
(5) The determination that an area is
‘‘rural in character’’ under this definition
will be to areas that are within:
(i) An urbanized area that has two
points on its boundary that are at least
40 miles apart, which is not contiguous
or adjacent to a city or town that has a
population of greater than 150,000
inhabitants or the urbanized area of
such a city town; or
(ii) An urbanized area contiguous and
adjacent to a city or town of greater than
50,000 population that is within onequarter mile of a rural area.
Small farm. A farm or ranch that has
averaged $250,000 or less in annual
gross sales of agricultural products in
the previous three years.
Socially disadvantaged farmer or
rancher. This term has the meaning
given it in section 355(e) of the
Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2003(e)). A
farmer or rancher who is a member of
a ‘‘socially disadvantaged group.’’ In this
definition, the term farmer or rancher
means a person that is engaged in
farming or ranching or an entity solely
owned by individuals who are engaged
in farming or ranching. A socially
disadvantaged group means a group
whose members have been subjected to
racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice
because of their identity as members of
a group without regard to their
individual qualities. In the event that
there are multiple farmer or rancher
owners of the applicant organization,
the Agency requires that at least 51
percent of the ownership be held by
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
members of a socially disadvantaged
group.
State. Any of the 50 States of the
United States, the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands,
Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the Republic of Palau, the
Federated States of Micronesia, and the
Republic of the Marshall Islands.
State director. The term ‘‘State
Director’’ means, with respect to a State,
the Director of the Rural Development
State Office.
State office. USDA Rural
Development offices located in each
state.
Total project cost. The sum of all
grant and matching funds in the project
budget that reflects the eligible project
tasks associated with the work plan.
Value-added agricultural product.
Any agricultural commodity or product
that meets the requirements specified in
paragraphs (1) and (2) of this definition.
(1) The agricultural commodity or
product must meet one of the following
five value-added methodologies:
(i) Has undergone a change in
physical state;
(ii) Was produced in a manner that
enhances the value of the agricultural
commodity or product;
(iii) Is physically segregated in a
manner that results in the enhancement
of the value of the agricultural
commodity or product;
(iv) Is a source of farm- or ranch-based
renewable energy, including E–85 fuel;
or
(v) Is aggregated and marketed as a
locally-produced agricultural food
product.
(2) As a result of the change in
physical state or the manner in which
the agricultural commodity or product
was produced, marketed, or segregated:
(i) The customer base for the
agricultural commodity or product is
expanded and
(ii) A greater portion of the revenue
derived from the marketing, processing,
or physical segregation of the
agricultural commodity or product is
available to the producer of the
commodity or product.
Venture. The business, including the
project and other related activities.
Working capital grant. A grant to
provide funds to operate a value-added
project, specifically to pay the eligible
project expenses related to the
processing and/or marketing of the
value-added product that are eligible
uses of grant funds.
§ 4284.903
Review or appeal rights.
A person may seek a review of an
Agency decision under this subpart
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
from the appropriate Agency official
that oversees the program in question or
appeal to the National Appeals Division
in accordance with 7 CFR part 11.
§ 4284.904
Exception authority.
Except as specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, the
Administrator may make exceptions to
any requirement or provision of this
subpart, if such exception is necessary
to implement the intent of the
authorizing statute in a time of national
emergency or in accordance with a
Presidentially-declared disaster, or, on a
case-by-case basis, when such an
exception is in the best financial
interests of the Federal Government and
is otherwise not in conflict with
applicable laws.
(a) Applicant eligibility. No exception
to applicant eligibility can be made.
(b) Project eligibility. No exception to
project eligibility can be made.
§ 4284.905 Nondiscrimination and
compliance with other Federal laws.
(a) Other Federal laws. Applicants
must comply with other applicable
Federal laws, including the Equal
Employment Opportunities Act of 1972,
the Americans with Disabilities Act, the
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Title VI
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,
the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and
7 CFR part 1901–E.
(b) Nondiscrimination. The U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA)
prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of
race, color, national origin, age,
disability, and where applicable, sex,
marital status, familial status, parental
status, religion, sexual orientation,
genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an
individual’s income is derived from any
public assistance program. (Not all
prohibited bases apply to all programs.)
Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication of
program information (Braille, large
print, audiotape, etc.) should contact
USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–
2600 (voice and TDD). Any applicant
that believes it has been discriminated
against as a result of applying for funds
under this program should contact:
USDA, Director, Office of Adjudication
and Compliance, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9410, or call (800) 795–3272 (voice) or
(202) 720–6382 (TDD) for information
and instructions regarding the filing of
a Civil Rights complaint. USDA is an
equal opportunity provider, employer,
and lender.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29927
(c) Civil rights compliance. Recipients
of grants must comply with Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This
includes collection and maintenance of
data on the basis of race, sex and
national origin of the recipient’s
membership/ownership and employees.
These data must be available to conduct
compliance reviews in accordance with
7 CFR part 1901, subpart E. For grants
initial compliance review will be
conducted after Form RD 400–4,
‘‘Assurance Agreement,’’ is signed and
one subsequent compliance review after
the last disbursement of grant funds
have been made, and the facility or
programs been in full operations for 90
days.
(d) Executive Order 12898. When a
project is proposed and financial
assistance is requested, the Agency will
conduct a Civil Rights Impact Analysis
(CRIA) with regards to environmental
justice. The CRIA must be conducted
and the analysis documented utilizing
Form RD 2006–38, ‘‘Civil Right Impact
Analysis Certification.’’ This
certification must be done prior to grant
approval, obligation of funds, or other
commitments of Agency resources,
including issuance of a Letter of
Conditions, whichever occurs first.
§ 4284.906 State laws, local laws,
regulatory commission regulations.
If there are conflicts between this
subpart and State or local laws or
regulatory commission regulations, the
provisions of this subpart will control.
§ 4284.907
Environmental requirements.
All grants awarded under this subpart
are subject to the environmental
requirements in subpart G of 7 CFR part
1940 or successor regulations.
Applications for planning grants are
generally excluded from the
environmental review process by
§ 1940.333 of this title. Applicants for
working capital grants must submit
Form 1940–22, Categorical Exclusion
Checklist.
§ 4284.908
Incorporation by reference.
(a) Departmental regulations. Unless
specifically stated, this subpart
incorporates by reference the
regulations of the Department of
Agriculture’s Office of Chief Financial
Officer (or successor office) as codified
in 7 CFR parts 3000 through 3099,
including, but not necessarily limited
to, 7 CFR parts 3015 through 3019, 7
CFR part 3021, and 7 CFR part 3052,
and successor regulations to these parts.
(b) Cost principles. This subpart
incorporates by reference the cost
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
29928
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
principles found in 2 CFR part 230 and
in 48 CFR part 31.2.
(c) Definitions. If a term is defined
differently in the Departmental
Regulations, 2 CFR 230, or 48 CRF 31.2
and in this subpart, such term shall
have the meaning as found in this
subpart.
§ 4284.909 Forms, regulations, and
instructions.
Copies of all forms, regulations,
instructions, and other materials related
to the program referenced in this
subpart may be obtained through the
Agency.
§§ 4284.910–4284.914
[Reserved]
Section B—Funding and Programmatic
Change Notifications
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4284.915
Notifications.
In implementing this subpart, the
Agency will issue notifications
addressing funding and programmatic
changes, as specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section, respectively. The
methods that the Agency will use in
making these notifications is specified
in paragraph (c) of this section, and the
timing of these notifications is specified
in paragraph (d) of this section.
(a) Funding and simplified
applications. The Agency will issue
notifications concerning:
(1) The funding level and the
minimum and maximum grant amount
and any additional funding information
as determined by the Agency; and
(2) The contents of simplified
applications, as provided for in
§ 4284.932.
(b) Programmatic changes. The
Agency will issue notifications of the
programmatic changes specified in
paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this
section.
(1) The set of Administrator priority
categories or their point allocation, if
the provisions specified in
§ 4284.942(b)(6) are not to be used for
awarding Administrator points.
Administrator priorities that the
program may consider are:
(i) Unserved or underserved areas.
(ii) Geographic diversity.
(iii) Emergency conditions.
(iv) To more effectively accomplish
the mission area’s plans, goals, and
objectives.
(v) Public health and safety.
(2) Additional reports that are
generally applicable across projects
within a program associated with the
monitoring of and reporting on project
performance.
(3) Any information specified in
§ 4284.933.
(4) Preliminary review information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
(c) Notification methods. The Agency
will issue the information specified in
paragraphs (a) and (b) in one or more
Federal Register notices. In addition, all
information will be available at any
Rural Development office.
(d) Timing. The Agency will make the
information specified in paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section available as
specified in paragraphs (d)(1) through
(3) of this section.
(1) The Agency will make the
information specified in paragraph (a) of
this section available each fiscal year.
(2) The Agency will make the
information specified in paragraphs
(b)(1) of this section available at least 60
days prior to the application deadline,
as applicable.
(3) The Agency will make the
information specified in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (4) of this section
available on an as needed basis.
§§ 4284.916–4284.919
[Reserved]
Section C—Eligibility
§ 4284.920
Applicant eligibility.
To be eligible for a grant under this
subpart, an applicant must demonstrate
that they meet the requirements
specified in paragraphs (a) through (d)
of this section, as applicable, and are
subject to the limitations specified in
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section.
(a) Type of applicant. The applicant
must demonstrate that they meet all
definition requirements for one of the
following applicant types:
(1) An independent producer;
(2) An agricultural producer group;
(3) A farmer or rancher cooperative; or
(4) A majority-controlled producerbased business venture.
(b) Emerging market. An applicant
that is an agricultural producer group, a
farmer or rancher cooperative, or a
majority-controlled producer-based
business venture must demonstrate that
they are entering into an emerging
market as a result of the proposed
project.
(c) Citizenship.
(1) Individual applicants must
demonstrate that they:
(i) Are citizens or nationals of the
United States (U.S.), the Republic of
Palau, the Federated States of
Micronesia, the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, or American Samoa,
or
(ii) Reside in the U.S. after legal
admittance for permanent residence.
(2) Entities other than individuals
must demonstrate that they are at least
51 percent owned by individuals who
are either citizens as identified under
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section or
legally admitted permanent residents
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
residing in the U.S. This paragraph is
not applicable if the entity is owned
solely by members of one immediate
family. In such instance, if at least one
of the immediate family members is a
citizen or national, as defined in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, then the
entity is eligible.
(d) Legal authority and responsibility.
Each applicant must demonstrate that
they have, or can obtain, the legal
authority necessary to carry out the
purpose of the grant.
(e) Multiple grant eligibility. An
applicant may submit only one
application in response to this notice,
and must direct that it compete in either
the general funds competition or in one
of the reserved funds competitions.
Separate entities with identical or
greater than 75 percent common
ownership may only submit one
application for one entity per year.
Applicants who have already received a
planning grant for the proposed project
cannot receive another planning grant
for the same project. Applicants who
have already received a working capital
grant for the proposed project cannot
receive any additional grants for that
project.
(f) Active VAPG grant. If an applicant
has an active value-added grant at the
time of a subsequent application, the
current grant must be closed out within
90 days of the annual NOFA.
§ 4284.921
Ineligible applicants.
(a) Consistent with the Departmental
regulations, an applicant is ineligible if
the applicant is debarred or suspended
or is otherwise excluded from or
ineligible for participation in Federal
assistance programs under Executive
Order 12549, ‘‘Debarment and
Suspension.’’
(b) An applicant will be considered
ineligible for a grant due to an
outstanding judgment obtained by the
U.S. in a Federal Court (other than U.S.
Tax Court), is delinquent on the
payment of Federal income taxes, or is
delinquent on Federal debt.
§ 4284.922
Project eligibility.
To be eligible for a VAPG grant, the
application must demonstrate that the
project meets the requirements specified
in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this
section, as applicable.
(a) Product eligibility. Each product
that is the subject of the proposed
project must meet the definition of a
value-added agricultural product,
including a demonstration that:
(1) The value-added product results
from one of the value-added
methodologies identified in paragraphs
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(1)(i) through (v) of the definition of
value-added agricultural product;
(2) As a result of the project, the
customer base for the agricultural
commodity or product is expanded; and
(3) As a result of the project, a greater
portion of the revenue derived from the
marketing or processing of the valueadded product is available to the
agricultural producer of the commodity
or product.
(b) Purpose eligibility.
(1) The grant funds requested must
not exceed the amount specified
annually for planning and working
capital grant requests.
(2) The matching funds required for
the project budget must be available
during the project period and verified in
the application.
(3) The proposed project must be
limited to eligible planning or working
capital activities as defined at
§ 4284.923, as applicable, with eligible
tasks directly related to the processing
and/or marketing of the subject valueadded product.
(4) The project work plan and budget
must:
(i) Present a detailed breakdown of all
estimated costs associated with the
eligible planning or working capital
activities related to the processing
and/or marketing of the value-added
product and allocate those costs among
the listed tasks;
(ii) Identify the sources and uses of
grant and matching funds for all tasks
specified in the budget; and
(iii) Present a project budget period of
not longer than 36 months, scaled to
complexity, and concluding not later
than 3 years after the proposed start
date.
(5) Working capital applications must
include a feasibility study and business
plan completed specifically for the
proposed value-added project by a
qualified consultant. The Agency must
concur in the acceptability or adequacy
of the feasibility study and business
plan for eligibility purposes.
(6) If the applicant is an agricultural
producer group, a farmer or rancher
cooperative, or a majority-controlled
producer-based business venture, the
applicant must demonstrate that it is
entering an emerging market.
(7) All applicants for working capital
must either be currently marketing each
value-added agricultural product that is
the subject of the grant application, or
be ready to implement the working
capital activities in accord with the
budget and work plan timeline
proposed.
(c) Branding activities. Applications
that propose only branding, packaging,
or other similar means of product
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
differentiation are not eligible under
this subpart. However, applications that
propose branding, packaging, or other
product differentiation activities that are
no more than 25 percent of total project
costs of a value-added project for
products otherwise eligible in one of the
five value-added methodologies
specified in paragraphs (1)(i) through (v)
of the definition of value-added
agricultural product are eligible.
(d) Reserved funds eligibility. In
addition to the requirements specified
in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this
section, the requirements specified in
paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section
must be met, as applicable. All eligible,
but unfunded reserved funds
applications will be eligible to compete
for general funds in that same fiscal
year, as funding levels permit.
(1) If the applicant is applying for
beginning farmer or rancher, or sociallydisadvantaged farmer or rancher
reserved funds, the applicant must
provide documentation demonstrating
that the applicant meets one of these
definitions.
(2) If the applicant is applying for
mid-tier value chain reserved funds, the
application must:
(i) Demonstrate that the project
proposes development of a local or
regional supply network of an
interconnected group of entities through
which agricultural products move from
production through consumption in a
local or regional area of the United
States, including a description of the
network, its component members, and
its purpose;
(ii) Describe at least two alliances,
linkages or partnerships within the
value chain that link independent
producers with businesses and
cooperatives that market value-added
agricultural products in a manner that
benefits small or medium-sized farms
and ranches that are structured as a
family farm, including the names of the
parties and the nature of their
collaboration;
(iii) Demonstrate how the project, due
to the manner in which the value-added
product is marketed, will increase the
profitability and competitiveness of at
least two eligible small or medium-sized
farms or ranches that are structured as
a family farm;
(iv) Document that the eligible
agricultural producer group/
cooperative/majority-controlled
producer-based business venture
applicant organization has obtained at
least one agreement with another
member of the supply network that is
engaged in the value chain on a
marketing strategy; or that the eligible
independent producer applicant has
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29929
obtained at least one agreement from an
eligible agricultural producer group/
cooperative/majority-controlled
producer-based business venture
engaged in the value-chain on a
marketing strategy;
(v) Demonstrate that the applicant
organization currently owns and
produces more than 50 percent of the
raw agricultural commodity that will be
used for the value-added product that is
the subject of the proposal; and
(vi) Demonstrate that the project will
result in an increase in customer base
and an increase in revenue returns to
the applicant producers supplying the
majority of the raw agricultural
commodity for the project.
§ 4284.923 Eligible uses of grant and
matching funds.
Grant and cost-share matching funds
have the same use restrictions and must
be used to fund only the costs for
approved purposes as defined in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(a) Planning funds may be used to pay
for a qualified consultant to conduct
and develop a feasibility study, business
plan, and/or marketing plan associated
with the processing and/or marketing of
a value-added agricultural product.
Planning funds may not be used for
applicant participation in feasibility
studies. In-kind contribution of
matching funds to cover applicant
participation in development of
business plans and/or marketing plans
is allowed to the extent that the value
of such work can be appropriately
valued. Funds may not be used to
evaluate the agricultural production of
the commodity itself, other than to
determine the project’s input costs
related to the feasibility of processing
and marketing the value-added product.
(b) Working capital funds may be
used to pay the project’s operational
costs directly related to the processing
and/or marketing of the value-added
product. Examples of eligible working
capital expenses include designing or
purchasing a financial accounting
system for the project, paying salaries of
employees without ownership interest
to process and/or market and deliver the
value-added product to consumers,
paying for inventory supply costs
necessary to produce the value-added
product from the agricultural
commodity or product, and paying for a
marketing campaign for the value-added
product.
§ 4284.924 Ineligible uses of grant and
matching funds.
Grant funds awarded under this
subpart may not be used to:
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
29930
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
(a) Plan, repair, rehabilitate, acquire,
or construct a building or facility
(including a processing facility);
(b) Purchase, lease purchase, or install
fixed equipment, including processing
equipment;
(c) Purchase or repair vehicles,
including boats;
(d) Pay for the preparation of the grant
application;
(e) Pay expenses not directly related
to the funded project;
(f) Fund research and development;
(g) Fund political or lobbying
activities;
(h) Fund any activities prohibited by
7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019, 2 CFR part
230, and 48 CFR part 31.2.
(i) Fund architectural or engineering
design work;
(j) Fund expenses related to the
production of any agricultural
commodity or product, including seed,
rootstock, labor for harvesting the crop,
and delivery of the commodity to a
processing facility;
(k) Conduct activities on behalf of
anyone other than a specifically
identified independent producer or
group of independent producers. The
Agency considers conducting industrylevel feasibility studies or business
plans, that are also known as feasibility
study templates or guides or business
plan templates or guides, to be ineligible
because the assistance is not provided to
a specific group of Independent
Producers;
(l) Duplicate current services or
replace or substitute support previously
provided;
(m) Pay any costs of the project
incurred prior to the date of grant
approval, including legal or other
expenses needed to incorporate or
organize a business;
(n) Pay for assistance to any business
that does not meet the requirements of
§ 4284.920(c);
(o) Pay any judgment or debt owed to
the United States;
(p) Pay for any goods or services
provided by a person or entity that has
a conflict of interest or an appearance of
a conflict of interest. Also, note that inkind matching funds may not be
provided by a person or entity that has
a conflict of interest or an appearance of
a conflict of interest;
(q) Purchase land; or
(r) Pay for costs associated with illegal
activities.
§ 4284.925
Funding limitations.
(a) Grant funds may be used to pay up
to 50 percent of the total eligible project
costs, subject to the limitations
established for maximum total grant
amount.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
(b) The maximum total grant amount
provided to a grantee in any one year
shall not exceed the amount announced
in an annual notice issued pursuant to
§ 4284.915, but in no event may the total
amount of grant funds provided to a
grant recipient exceed $500,000.
(c) A grant under this subsection shall
have a term that does not exceed 3
years. Grant project periods should be
scaled to the complexity of the
objectives for the project. The Agency
may extend the term of the grant period,
not to exceed the 3-year maximum.
(d) The aggregate amount of awards to
majority controlled producer-based
businesses may not exceed 10 percent of
the total funds obligated under this
subpart during any fiscal year.
(e) Not more than 5 percent of funds
appropriated each year may be used to
fund the Agricultural Marketing
Resource Center, to support electronic
capabilities to provide information
regarding research, business, legal,
financial, or logistical assistance to
independent producers and processors.
(f) Each fiscal year, the following
amounts of reserved funds will be made
available:
(1) 10 percent to fund projects that
benefit beginning farmers or ranchers, or
socially-disadvantaged farmers or
ranchers; and
(2) 10 percent to fund projects that
propose development of mid-tier value
chains.
(3) Funds not obligated by June 30 of
each fiscal year shall be available to the
general fund for the program.
§§ 4284.926–4284.929
[Reserved]
Section D—Applying for a Grant
§ 4284.930
Preliminary review.
The Agency encourages applicants to
contact their State Office well in
advance of the application submission
deadline, to ask questions and to
discuss project eligibility potential. At
its option, the Agency may establish a
preliminary review deadline so that it
may informally assess the eligibility of
the application and its completeness.
The result of the preliminary review is
not binding on the Agency. To
implement this section, the Agency will
issue a notification addressing this issue
in accordance with § 4284.915.
§ 4284.931
Application package.
All applicants are required to submit
an application package that is
comprised of the elements in this
section.
(a) Application forms. The following
application forms (or their successor
forms) must be completed when
applying for a grant under this subpart.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) Form SF–424, ‘‘Application for
Federal Assistance.’’
(2) Form SF–424A, ‘‘Budget
Information-Non-Construction
Programs.’’
(3) Form SF–424B, ‘‘Assurances—
Non-Construction Programs.’’
(4) Form RD 400–4, ‘‘Assurance
Agreement.’’
(5) Form RD 400–1, ‘‘Equal
Opportunity Agreement.’’
(6) All applicants are required to have
a DUNS number (including individuals
and sole proprietorships).
(b) Application content. The
following content items must be
completed when applying for a grant
under this subpart:
(1) Eligibility discussion. Using the
format prescribed by the application
package, the applicant must describe in
detail how the:
(i) Applicant (§§ 4284.920 and 921)
and project eligibility (§ 4284.922)
requirements are met;
(ii) Eligible use of grant and matching
funds (§§ 4284.923 and 924)
requirements are met; and
(iii) Funding limitation (§ 4284.925)
requirements are met.
(2) Evaluation criteria. Using the
format prescribed by the application
package, the applicant must address
each evaluation criterion identified
below.
(i) Performance evaluation criteria.
Applicants for planning grants must
suggest at least one criterion by which
their performance under a grant could
be evaluated. Applicants for working
capital grants must identify the
projected increase in customer base,
revenue accruing to independent
producers, and number of jobs
attributed to the project. Working
capital projects with significant
renewable energy components must also
identify the projected increase in
capacity per unit of measure annually
attributed to the project. Performance
criteria will be incorporated into the
applicant’s semi-annual and final
reporting requirements if selected for
award.
(ii) Proposal evaluation criteria.
Applicants must address each proposal
evaluation criterion identified in
§ 4284.942 in narrative form, in the
application package.
(3) Certification of matching funds.
Using the format prescribed by the
application package, applicants must
certify that:
(i) Cost-share matching funds will be
spent in advance of grant funding, such
that for every dollar of grant funds
disbursed, not less than an equal
amount of matching funds will have
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
been expended prior to submitting the
request for reimbursement; and
(ii) If matching funds are proposed in
an amount exceeding the grant amount,
those matching funds must be spent at
a proportional rate equal to the matchto-grant ratio identified in the proposed
budget.
(4) Verification of cost-share matching
funds. Using the format prescribed by
the application package, the applicant
must provide authentic documentation
from the source to confirm the eligibility
and availability of both cash and in-kind
contributions that meet the following
requirements:
(i) Matching funds are subject to the
same use restrictions as grant funds, and
must be spent on eligible project
expenses during the grant project
period.
(ii) Matching funds must be from
eligible sources without a conflict of
interest and without the appearance of
a conflict of interest.
(iii) Matching funds must be at least
equal to the amount of grant funds
requested, and combined grant and
matching funds must equal 100 percent
of the total eligible project costs.
(iv) Unless provided by other
authorizing legislation, other Federal
grant funds cannot be used as matching
funds.
(v) Matching funds must be provided
in the form of confirmed applicant cash,
loan, or line of credit; or confirmed
third-party cash or eligible third-party
in-kind contribution.
(vi) Examples of ineligible matching
funds include funds used for an
ineligible purpose, contributions
donated outside the proposed grant
period, third-party in-kind contributions
that are over-valued, expected program
income at time of application, or
instances where the potential for a
conflict of interest exists, including
applicant in-kind contributions in
§ 4284.923(a).
(5) Business plan. As part of the
application package, applicants for
working capital grants must provide a
copy of the business plan that was
completed for the proposed project. The
Agency must concur in the acceptability
or adequacy of the business plan.
(6) Feasibility study. As part of the
application package, applicants for
working capital grants must provide a
copy of the third-party feasibility study
that was completed for the proposed
project. The Agency must concur in the
acceptability or adequacy of the
feasibility study.
§ 4284.932
Simplified application.
Applicants requesting less than
$50,000 will be allowed to submit a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
simplified application, the contents of
which will be announced in an annual
notice issued pursuant to § 4284.915.
§ 4284.933
Filing instructions.
Unless otherwise specified in a
notification issued under § 4284.915,
the requirements specified in
paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section
apply to all applications.
(a) When to submit. Complete
applications must be received by the
Agency on or before March 15 of each
year to be considered for funding for
that fiscal year. Applications received
by the Agency after March 15 will not
be considered.
(b) Incomplete applications.
Incomplete applications will be
rejected. Applicants will be informed of
the elements that made the application
incomplete. If a resubmitted application
is received by the applicable application
deadline, the Agency will reconsider the
application.
(c) Where to submit. All applications
must be submitted to the State Office of
Rural Development in the State where
the project primarily takes place, or online through grants.gov.
(d) Format. Applications may be
submitted as hard copy, or
electronically via grants.gov. If
submitted as hard copy, only one
original copy should be submitted.
(e) Other forms and instructions.
Upon request, the Agency will make
available to the public the necessary
forms and instructions for filing
applications. These forms and
instructions may be obtained from any
State Office of Rural Development, or
the Agency’s Value-Added Producer
Grant program Web site—https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/coops/
vadg.htm.
§§ 4284.934–4284.939
[Reserved]
Section E—Processing and Scoring
Applications
§ 4284.940
Processing applications.
(a) Initial review. Upon receipt of an
application on or before the application
submission deadline for each fiscal year,
the Agency will conduct a review to
determine if the applicant and project
are eligible, and if the application is
complete and sufficiently responsive to
program requirements.
(b) Notifications. After the review in
paragraph (a) of this section has been
conducted, the Agency will notify the
applicant in writing of the Agency’s
findings. If the Agency has determined
that either the applicant or project is
ineligible or that the application is not
complete to allow evaluation of the
application or sufficiently responsive to
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29931
program requirements, it will include in
the notification the reason(s) for its
determination(s).
(c) Resubmittal by applicants.
Applicants may submit revised
applications to the Agency in response
to the notification received under
paragraph (b) of this section. If a revised
grant application is received on or
before the application deadline, it will
be processed by the Agency. If such
revised applications are not received by
the specified application deadline, the
Agency will not process the application
and will inform the applicant that their
application was not reviewed due to
tardiness.
(d) Subsequent ineligibility
determinations. If at any time an
application is determined to be
ineligible, the Agency will notify the
applicant in writing of its
determination.
§ 4284.941
Application withdrawal.
During the period between the
submission of an application and the
execution of award documents, the
applicant must notify the Agency in
writing if the project is no longer viable
or the applicant no longer is requesting
financial assistance for the project.
When the applicant so notifies the
Agency, the selection will be rescinded
or the application withdrawn.
§ 4284.942 Proposal evaluation criteria
and scoring applications.
(a) General. The Agency will only
score applications for which it has
determined that the applicant and
project are eligible, the application is
complete and sufficiently responsive to
program requirements, and the project is
likely feasible. Any applicant whose
application will not be reviewed
because the Agency has determined it
fails to meet the preceding criteria will
be notified of appeal rights pursuant to
§ 4284.903. Each such application the
Agency receives on or before the
application deadline in a fiscal year will
be scored in the fiscal year in which it
was received. Each application will be
scored based on the information
provided and/or referenced in the
scoring section of the application at the
time the applicant submits the
application to the Agency.
(b) Scoring applications. The
maximum number of points that will be
awarded to an application is 100, plus
an additional 10 points if the project is
located in a rural area. The criteria
specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through
(7) of this section will be used to score
each application. The Agency will
specify how points are awarded for each
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
29932
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed Rules
criterion in a Notice published each
fiscal year.
(1) Nature of the proposed project
(maximum 25 points).
(2) Personnel qualifications
(maximum 20 points).
(3) Commitments and support
(maximum 10 points).
(4) Work plan/budget (maximum 20
points).
(5) Type of applicant (maximum 15
points).
(6) Administrator priority categories
and points (maximum 10 points).
(7) Rural or rural area location (10
points may be awarded).
§§ 4284.943–4284.949
[Reserved]
Section F—Grant Awards and
Agreement
§ 4284.950
Award process.
(a) Selection of applications for
funding and for potential funding. The
Agency will select and rank
applications for funding based on the
score an application has received in
response to the proposal evaluation
criteria, compared to the scores of other
value-added applications received in
the same fiscal year. Higher scoring
applications will receive first
consideration for funding. The Agency
will notify applicants, in writing,
whether or not they have been selected
for funding. For those applicants not
selected for funding, the Agency will
provide a brief explanation for why they
were not selected.
(b) Ranked applications not funded. A
ranked application that is not funded in
the fiscal year in which it was submitted
will not be carried forward into the next
fiscal year. The Agency will notify the
applicant in writing.
(c) Intergovernmental review. If State
or local governments raise objections to
a proposed project under the
intergovernmental review process that
are not resolved within 90 days of the
Agency’s award announcement date, the
Agency will rescind the award and will
provide the applicant with a written
notice to that effect. The Agency, in its
sole discretion, may extend the 90-day
period if it appears resolution is
imminent.
WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4284.951
Grant agreement.
(a) Letter of conditions. When a grant
is obligated subject to conditions
established by the Agency, the Agency
will notify, in writing, each applicant
whose application has been selected for
funding using a Letter of Conditions,
which defines the conditions under
which the grant will be made. If the
applicant agrees with the conditions,
the applicant must complete, sign, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:17 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
return the Agency’s ‘‘Letter of Intent to
Meet Conditions.’’ If the applicant
believes that certain conditions cannot
be met, the applicant may propose
alternate conditions to the Agency. The
Agency must concur with any proposed
changes to the Letter of Conditions by
the applicant before the application will
be further processed. If the Agency
agrees to any proposed changes, the
Agency will issue a revised or amended
Letter of Conditions that defines the
final conditions under which the grant
will be made.
(b) Grant agreement and conditions.
Each grantee will be required to meet all
terms and conditions of the award
within 90 days of receiving a Letter of
Conditions unless otherwise specified
by the Agency at the time of award.
Each grantee will also be required to
sign a grant agreement that outlines the
approved use of funds and actions
under the award, as well as the
restrictions and applicable laws and
regulations that pertain to the award.
(c) Grant disbursements. Grant
disbursement will be made in
accordance with the Letter of
Conditions, and/or the grant agreement,
as applicable. Adequate supporting
documentation is required for all
disbursements.
§§ 4284.952–4284.959
[Reserved]
Section G—Post Award Activities and
Requirements
§ 4284.960 Monitoring and reporting
program performance.
The requirements specified in this
section shall apply to grants made under
this subpart.
(a) Grantees are responsible to expend
funds only for eligible purposes and
will be monitored by Agency staff for
compliance. Grantees must maintain a
financial management system, and
property and procurement standards in
accordance with Departmental
Regulations.
(b) Grantees must submit prescribed
narrative and financial performance
reports that include a comparison of
accomplishments with the objectives
stated in the application. The Agency
will prescribe both the narrative and
financial report formats in the grant
agreement.
(1) Semi-annual performance reports
shall be submitted within 30 days
following March 31 and September 30
each fiscal year. A final performance
report shall be submitted to the Agency
within 90 days of project completion.
Failure to submit a performance report
within the specified timeframes may
result in the Agency withholding grant
funds.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(2) Additional reports shall be
submitted as specified in the grant
agreement or Letter of Conditions, or as
otherwise provided in a notification
issued under § 4284.915.
(3) Copies of supporting
documentation and/or project
deliverables for completed tasks must be
provided to the Agency in a timely
manner in accord with the development
or completion of materials and in
conjunction with the budget and project
timeline. Examples include, but are not
limited to, a feasibility study, marketing
plan, business plan, success story, or
best practice.
(4) The Agency may request any
additional project and/or performance
data for the project for which grant
funds have been received.
§ 4284.961
Grant servicing.
All grants awarded under this subpart
shall be serviced in accordance with 7
CFR part 1951, subparts E and O, and
the Departmental Regulations.
§ 4284.962
Transfer of obligations.
An obligation of funds established for
an applicant may be transferred to a
different (substituted) applicant
provided:
(a) The substituted applicant:
(1) Is eligible;
(2) Has a close and genuine
relationship with the original applicant;
and
(3) Has the authority to receive the
assistance approved for the original
applicant; and
(b) The need, purpose(s), and scope of
the project for which the Agency funds
will be used remain substantially
unchanged.
§ 4284.963
activities.
Grant close out and related
In addition to the requirements
specified in the Departmental
regulations, failure to submit
satisfactory reports on time under the
provisions of § 4284.970(b) may result
in the suspension or termination of a
grant.
§§ 4284.964–4284.999
[Reserved]
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Pandor H. Hadjy,
Acting Administrator, Rural BusinessCooperative Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–12731 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XY–P
E:\FR\FM\28MYP1.SGM
28MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29920-29932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12731]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 29920]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
7 CFR Parts 1951 and 4284
RIN 0570-AA79
Value-Added Producer Grant Program
AGENCY: Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (the Act),
amends section 231 of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000,
which established the Value-Added Producer Grant Program. This program
will be administered by the Rural Business-Cooperative Service. Under
the proposed program, grants will be made to help eligible producers of
agricultural commodities enter into or expand value-added activities
including the development of feasibility studies, business plans, and
marketing strategies. The program will also provide working capital for
expenses such as implementing an existing viable marketing strategy.
The Agency proposes to implement the program to meet the goals and
requirements of the Act.
The Agency is also proposing an amendment to existing regulations
that would allow the delegation of the post-award servicing of the
proposed program to USDA State Office personnel. Please note that this
amendment would only affect the post-award servicing of the grant and
would not affect the process for awarding grants, which would still
occur at the National office.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before June
28, 2010 to be assured of consideration. A 30-day comment period is
provided for interested persons to comment on the regulatory provisions
of this proposed rule. The Agency has determined that a 30-day comment
period, rather than the traditional 60 day comment period, is
appropriate in order to provide a sufficient amount of time to comment
while ensuring program performance during the current fiscal year. This
action will also provide applicants more time to develop quality
applications for the program with minimal disruptions in ongoing
farming activities.
The comment period for the information collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 continues through July 27, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to this proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments
electronically.
Mail: Submit your written comments via the U.S. Postal
Service to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management
Branch, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 0742, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-0742.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit your written comments via
Federal Express mail, or other courier service requiring a street
address, to the Branch Chief, Regulations and Paperwork Management
Branch, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th Floor,
Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be available for public inspection during
regular work hours at the 300 7th Street, SW, 7th Floor address listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Jermolowicz USDA, Rural
Development, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Room 4016, South
Agriculture Building, Stop 3250, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-3250, Telephone: (202) 720-7558, E-mail
CPGrants@wdc.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory Authority
Section 231 of the Agriculture Risk Protection Act of 2000 (Pub. L.
106-224) as amended by section 6202 of the Food, Conservation, and
Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246) (see 7 U.S.C. 1621 note)
authorizes the establishment of the Value-Added Agricultural Product
Market Development grants, also known as Value-Added Producer Grants.
The Secretary of Agriculture has delegated the program's administration
to USDA Rural Development Cooperative Programs.
B. Nature of the Program
This subpart contains the provisions and procedures by which the
Agency will administer the Value-Added Producer Grant (VAPG) Program.
The primary objective of this grant program is to help Independent
Producers of Agricultural Commodities, Agriculture Producer Groups,
Farmer and Rancher Cooperatives, and Majority-Controlled Producer-Based
Business Ventures develop strategies to create marketing opportunities
and to help develop Business Plans for viable marketing opportunities
regarding production of bio-based products from agricultural
commodities. As with all value-added efforts, generating new products,
creating expanded marketing opportunities, and increasing producer
income are the end goal.
Eligible applicants are independent agricultural producers, farmer
and rancher cooperatives, agricultural producer groups, and majority-
controlled producer-based business ventures.
Grant funds cannot be used for planning, repairing, rehabilitating,
acquiring, or constructing a building or facility (including a
processing facility). They also cannot be used to purchase, rent, or
install fixed equipment.
This program requires matching funds equal to or greater than the
amount of grant funds requested. The Act provides for both mandatory
and discretionary funding for the program, as may be appropriated.
During subsequent years, additional funding may be appropriated. The
number of grants awarded will vary from year to year, based on
availability of funds and the quality of applications. The maximum
grant amount that may be awarded is $500,000. However, the Agency may
reduce that amount depending on the total funds appropriated for the
program in a given fiscal year. This policy allows more grants to be
awarded under reduced funding.
The Agency notes, pursuant to general Federal directives providing
guidance on grant usage, that the 100 percent matching funds
requirement described in the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000
may include payment for the time of the applicant/producer or the
applicant/producer's family members
[[Page 29921]]
only for the production of the business and marketing plans. Please
contact the state office for further information.
II. Request for Public Comments on Specific Aspects of the Proposed
Program
The Agency is interested in receiving comments on all aspects of
the proposed rule. Areas in which the Agency is seeking specific
comments are identified below. All comments should be submitted as
indicated in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
a. Medium-sized farm. As proposed, medium-sized farm is defined as
``A farm or ranch that has averaged between $250,001 and $700,000 in
annual gross sales of agricultural products in the previous three
years.'' The Agency is specifically requesting comment on whether it is
more appropriate to use $500,000 as the upper limit in this definition.
Please be sure to provide rationale for your position.
b. Branding activities. The Agency is proposing to allow branding,
packaging, or other product differentiation activities that are not
more than 25 percent of the total project cost of a value-added project
for products otherwise eligible in one of the five value-added
methodologies specified in paragraphs (1)(i) through (v) of the
definition of value-added agricultural product to be eligible. The
Agency is seeking specific comment on the proposed 25 percent limit. If
you believe a different limit is more appropriate, please identify your
suggested limit and provide your rationale to support your suggestion.
III. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The following paragraphs present a discussion of provisions of each
section of the proposed rule in the order that they appear.
A. Purpose (Sec. 4284.901)
This section implements the value-added agricultural product market
development grant program administered by the Rural Business-
Cooperative Service whereby grants are made to enable producers to
develop businesses that produce and market value-added agricultural
products.
B. Definitions (Sec. 4284.902)
This section presents program specific definitions which are
included to more clearly implement the program.
C. Review or Appeal Rights (Sec. 4284.903)
This section addresses how a person may seek a review of an Agency
decision or file an appeal.
D. Exception Authority (Sec. 4284.904)
This section explains the Administrator's authority to make
exceptions to regulatory requirements or provisions and specifically
excludes permission to make exceptions for:
Applicant eligibility
Project eligibility
The Agency believes that applicant and project eligibility criteria
must be maintained at all times in order to be consistent with
statutory authority.
E. Nondiscrimination and Compliance With Other Federal Laws (Sec.
4284.905)
This section explains that applicants must comply with all
applicable Federal laws. Additionally, this section explains how an
applicant that believes it has been discriminated against as a result
of applying for funds under this program can file a Civil Rights
complaint with the USDA Office of Adjudication and Compliance.
F. State Laws, Local Laws, Regulatory Commission Regulations (Sec.
4284.906)
This section addresses how conflicts between this subpart and State
or local laws, or regulatory commission regulations will be resolved.
G. Environmental Requirements (Sec. 4284.907)
This section addresses the relationship between grants awarded
under this subpart and the environmental requirements of subpart G of 7
CFR part 1940.
H. Incorporation by Reference (Sec. 4284.908)
This section identifies the various regulations that are
incorporated by reference in this subpart.
I. Forms, Regulations, and Instructions (Sec. 4284.909)
This section identifies how forms, regulations, instructions and
other materials related to programs may be obtained.
J. Notifications (Sec. 4284.915)
This section describes the methods the Agency will use in making
notifications regarding funding and programmatic changes.
K. Applicant Eligibility (Sec. 4284.920)
This section describes the requirements an applicant must meet to
be eligible for a grant under this subpart, including, but not limited
to, such areas as citizenship, legal authority, and multiple grants. An
applicant must demonstrate that they meet all definition requirements
for one of the following applicant types:
An independent producer;
An agricultural producer group;
A farmer or rancher cooperative; or
A majority-controlled producer-based business venture.
L. Ineligible Applicants (Sec. 4284.921)
This section describes those conditions under which an applicant
will be considered ineligible to participate in this program.
M. Project Eligibility (Sec. 4284.922)
The eligibility requirements applicable to this subpart are
described in this section. For a product to be eligible it must meet
the definition of a value-added agricultural product. The applicant
must also demonstrate that, as a result of the project, the customer
base for the agricultural commodity or product is expanded, and that a
greater portion of the revenue derived from the marketing or processing
of the value-added product is available to the agricultural producer of
the commodity or product.
Other aspects of project eligibility discussed in this section
include, but are not limited to, availability of matching funds,
submittal of various items such as work plans, budgets, feasibility
studies, and business plans, and how applications that include branding
and packaging will be handled.
N. Eligible Uses of Grant Funds (Sec. 4284.923)
The section identifies the eligible uses of grant and matching
funds for both planning funds and working capital funds, and requires
that grant and matching funds meet the same use restrictions, including
being used to fund only the costs for approved purposes.
O. Ineligible Uses of Grant and Matching Funds (Sec. 4284.924)
This section describes those activities for which Agency funds
under this subpart may not be used. Ineligible uses include expenses
related to payment for preparation of the grant application and any
activities prohibited by 7 CFR parts 3015 and 3019, 2 CFR part 230, and
48 CFR part 31. Expenses related to the production of any agricultural
commodity or product, including seed, rootstock, labor for harvesting
the crop, and delivery of the commodity to a processing facility are
not eligible. Any costs of the project incurred prior to the date of
grant approval, including legal or other expenses needed to incorporate
or organize a business, are ineligible.
[[Page 29922]]
P. Funding Limitations (Sec. 4284.925)
This section describes the maximum grant fund amount that a grant
recipient can receive ($500,000) and several grant terms, including,
but not limited to, the portion of total project eligible costs that
grant funds can be used to pay (up to 50%) and the term of a grant (not
to exceed 3 years).
Q. Preliminary Review (Sec. 4284.930)
This section encourages applicants to contact their State Office
before they submit their applications.
R. Application Package (Sec. 4284.931)
The application forms, content, evaluation criteria, verifications
and certifications required in the application package are detailed in
this section.
S. Siplified Application (Sec. 4284.932)
This section addresses simplified applications, which are
applicable to applicants requesting less than $50,000.
T. Filing Instructions (Sec. 4284.933)
This section provides the instructions for filing an application
with the Agency. Completed applications must be received on or before
March 15 of each year to be considered for funding that fiscal year.
Late and/or incomplete applications will not be considered. Included in
this section is information on where to submit and the format required
for submission.
U. Processing Applications (Sec. 4284.940)
This section explains the process by which the Agency will conduct
an application review to determine if the application is complete and
meets program requirements. After review, the Agency will notify
applicants in writing of their findings. Applicants determined to be
ineligible may revise and resubmit their applications to the Agency on
or before the application deadline.
V. Application Withdrawal (Sec. 4284.941)
This section describes the process whereby an applicant must notify
the Agency in writing of its intention to withdraw its application for
assistance.
W. Scoring Applications (Sec. 4284.942)
This section describes the process and criteria the Agency will use
to score applications. The Agency will only score applications for
which it has determined that the applicant and project are eligible and
that the application is complete and sufficiently responsive to program
requirements. Each such application the Agency receives on or before
the application deadline in a fiscal year will be scored in the fiscal
year in which it was received. Applications will be scored based on the
information provided and/or referenced in the scoring section of the
application at the time the applicant submits the application to the
Agency. The maximum number of points that may be awarded to an
application is 100, based on the criteria specified in this section.
X. Award Process (Sec. 4284.950)
This section describes the process by which the Agency will select
applications for funding. Funding will be based on the score an
application has received compared to the scores of other applications.
Higher scoring applications will receive first consideration for
funding. The Agency will notify in writing applicants whose
applications have been selected for funding as well as inform those who
did not receive funding, including a brief explanation as to why.
Y. Grant Agreement (Sec. 4284.951)
This section describes the conditions under which the grant will be
made to the applicant. Each grantee will be required to meet all terms
and conditions of the award within 90 days of receiving the Letter of
Conditions, unless otherwise specified by the Agency at the time of the
award.
Z. Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance (Sec. 4284.960)
The required monitoring and reporting activities are described in
this section. Requirements include semiannual performance reports which
must be submitted to the Agency within 30 days following March 31 and
September 30. Failure to submit timely performance reports may result
in the Agency withholding grant funds.
AA. Grant Servicing (Sec. 4284.961)
This section states that all grants awarded under this subpart will
be serviced pursuant to 7 CFR part 1951, subparts E and O, and in
Departmental Regulations. Note that as a separate action being proposed
today, the Agency is proposing an amendment to Sec. 1951.215 of
subpart E. Paragraph (b)(2) in that section currently states that ``All
other grants will be serviced in accordance with the Grant Agreement
and this subpart. Prior approval of the Administrator is required
except for actions covered in the preceding paragraph.'' The Agency is
proposing to amend this paragraph by deleting the second sentence. This
proposed amendment would facilitate the delegation of the servicing of
the proposed program, and other grant programs that use part 1951 as
their servicing regulation, to USDA State Office personnel. As noted
earlier, the awarding of grants will occur at the National office.
BB. Transfer of Obligations (Sec. 4284.962)
This section explains those circumstances under which an obligation
of funds established for an applicant may be transferred to a different
(substituted) applicant.
CC. Grant Close out and Related Activities (Sec. 4284.963)
This section addresses the requirements for conducting grant close
out and other related activities.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order (EO)
12866 and has been determined not significant by the Office of
Management and Budget. The EO defines a ``significant regulatory
action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this EO.
The Agency conducted a cost-benefit analysis to fulfill the
requirements of Executive Order 12866. The Agency has identified
potential benefits to prospective program participants and the Agency
that are associated with improving the availability of funds to help
producers (farmers) expand their customer base for the products or
commodities that they produce. This results in a greater portion of the
revenues derived from the value-added activity being made available to
the producer of the product. These benefits are important to the
success of individual producers, farmer or rancher cooperatives,
agriculture producer groups, and majority-controlled producer based
business ventures.
B. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of
[[Page 29923]]
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, Rural Development
must prepare, to the extent practicable, a written statement, including
a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal
mandates'' that may result in expenditures to State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100
million or more in any one year. With certain exceptions, section 205
of UMRA requires Rural Development to identify and consider a
reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule.
This proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Thus, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
C. Environmental Impact Statement
This document has been reviewed in accordance with 7 CFR part 1940,
subpart G, ``Environmental Program.'' Rural Development has determined
that this action does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, in
accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969,
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq., an Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
D. Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988, Civil Justice Reform. Except where specified, all State and
local laws and regulations that are in direct conflict with this rule
will be preempted. Federal funds carry Federal requirements. No person
is required to apply for funding under this program, but if they do
apply and are selected for funding, they must comply with the
requirements applicable to the Federal program funds. This rule is not
retroactive. It will not affect agreements entered into prior to the
effective date of the rule. Before any judicial action may be brought
regarding the provisions of this rule, the administrative appeal
provisions of 7 CFR parts 11 and 780 must be exhausted.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
It has been determined, under Executive Order 13132, Federalism,
that this proposed rule does not have sufficient Federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. The
provisions contained in the proposed rule will not have a substantial
direct effect on States or their political subdivisions or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various government
levels.
F. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-602) generally
requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute. If an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities, this analysis is not required.
Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
In compliance with the RFA, Rural Development has determined that
this action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the reasons discussed below.
While, the majority of producers of agricultural commodities expected
to participate in this Program will be small businesses, the average
cost to participants is estimated to be approximately 20 percent of the
total mandatory funding available to the program in fiscal years 2009
through 2012. Further, this regulation only affects producers that
choose to participate in the program. Lastly, small entity applicants
will not be affected to a greater extent than large entity applicants.
G. Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
This program is subject to Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with State and local officials.
Intergovernmental consultation will occur for the assistance to
producers of agricultural commodities in accordance with the process
and procedures outlined in 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V.
Rural Development will conduct intergovernmental consultation using
RD Instruction 1940-J, ``Intergovernmental Review of Rural Development
Programs and Activities,'' available in any Rural Development office,
on the Internet at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/regs, and in 7 CFR part
3015, subpart V. Note that not all States have chosen to participate in
the intergovernmental review process. A list of participating States is
available at the following Web site: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants/spoc.html.
H. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This executive order imposes requirements on Rural Development in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications or
preempt tribal laws. Rural Development has determined that the proposed
rule does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribe(s) or on either the relationship or the distribution of powers
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and the Indian
tribes. Thus, the proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 13175.
I. Programs Affected
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: This program
is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance under Number
10.352.
J. Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information requirements contained in this
proposed rule have been submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, USDA Rural Development will seek standard OMB approval of
the reporting requirements contained in this proposed rule and hereby
opens a 60-day public comment period.
Title: Value-Added Producer Grant Program.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The collection of information is vital to Rural
Development to make decisions regarding the eligibility of grant
recipients in order to ensure compliance with the regulations and to
ensure that the funds obtained from the Government are being used for
the purposes for which they were awarded. Entities seeking funding
under this program will have to submit applications that include
information on the entity's eligibility, information on each of the
evaluation criteria, certification of matching funds, verification of
cost-share matching funds, business plan, and feasibility study. This
information will be used to determine applicant eligibility and to
ensure that funds are used for authorized purposes.
Once an entity has been approved and their application accepted for
funding, the entity would be required to sign a Letter of Conditions
and a grant agreement. The grant agreement outlines
[[Page 29924]]
the approved use of funds and actions, as well as the restrictions and
applicable laws and regulations that apply to the award. Grantees must
maintain a financial system and, in accordance with Departmental
regulations, property and procurement standards. Grantees must submit
semi-annual financial performance reports that include a comparison of
accomplishments with the objectives stated in the application and a
final performance report. Finally, grantees must provide copies of
supporting documentation and/or project deliverables for completed
tasks (e.g., feasibility studies, business plans, marketing plans,
success stories, best practices).
The following estimates are based on the anticipated average over
the first three years the program is in place:
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to average 34.1 hours per response.
Respondents: Producers of agricultural commodities.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 535.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 3.3.
Estimated Number of Responses: 1,783.
Estimated Total Annual Burden (hours) on Respondents: 60,724.
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Cheryl
Thompson, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch at (202) 692-
0043.
Comments
Comments are invited regarding: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of Rural Development, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of Rural Development's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments may be
sent to Cheryl Thompson, Regulations and Paperwork Management Branch,
Support Services Division, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural
Development, Stop 0742, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC
20250-0742. All responses to this proposed rule will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become
a matter of public record.
K. E-Government Act Compliance
USDA is committed to complying with the E-Government Act of 2002
(Pub. L. 107-347, December 17, 2002), to promote the use of the
Internet and other information technologies to provide increased
opportunities for citizen access to government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 1951 and 4284
Agricultural commodities, agricultural products, grant programs,
rural areas, rural development, value-added activities.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, parts 1951 and 4284 of
title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 1951--SERVICING AND COLLECTIONS
1. The authority citation for part 1951 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 7 U.S.C. 1932 Note; 7 U.S.C. 1989; 31
U.S.C. 3716; 42 U.S.C. 1480.
Subpart E--Servicing of Community and Direct Business Programs
Loans and Grants
2. Section 1951.215 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1951.215 Grants.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) All other grants will be serviced in accordance with the Grant
Agreement and this subpart.
PART 4284--GRANTS
3. The authority citation for part 4284 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301 and 7 U.S.C. 1989
4. Part 4284 is amended by revising subpart J to read as follows:
Subpart J--Value-Added Producer Grant Program
Section A--General
Sec.
4284.901 Purpose.
4284.902 Definitions.
4284.903 Review or appeal rights.
4284.904 Exception authority.
4284.905 Nondiscrimination and compliance with other Federal laws.
4284.906 State laws, local laws, regulatory commission regulations.
4284.907 Environmental requirements.
4284.908 Incorporation by reference.
4284.909 Forms, regulations, and instructions.
4284.910--4284.914 [Reserved]
Section B--Funding and Programmatic Change Notifications
4284.915 Notifications.
4284.916--4284.919 [Reserved]
Section C--Eligibility
4284.920 Applicant eligibility.
4284.921 Ineligible applicants.
4284.922 Project eligibility.
4284.923 Eligible uses of grant funds.
4284.924 Ineligible uses of grant and matching funds.
4284.925 Funding limitations.
4284.926--4284.929 [Reserved]
Section D--Applying for a Grant
4284.930 Preliminary review.
4284.931 Applications.
4284.932 Simplified applications.
4284.933 Filing instructions.
4284.934--4284.939 [Reserved]
Section E--Processing and Scoring Applications
4284.940 Processing applications.
4284.941 Application withdrawal.
4284.942 Scoring applications.
4284.943--4284.949 [Reserved]
Section F--Grant Awards and Agreement
4284.950 Award process.
4284.951 Grant agreement.
4284.952--4284.959 [Reserved]
Section G--Post Award Activities and Requirements
4284.960 Monitoring and reporting program performance.
4284.961 Grant servicing.
4284.962 Transfer of obligations.
4284.963 Grant close out and related activities.
4284.964--4284.999 [Reserved]
Section A--General
Sec. 4284.901 Purpose.
This subpart implements the value-added agricultural product market
development grant program (Value-Added Producer Grants) administered by
the Rural Business-Cooperative Service whereby grants are made to
enable producers to develop businesses that produce and market value-
added agricultural products.
Sec. 4284.902 Definitions.
Administrator. The Administrator of the Rural Business-Cooperative
Service or designees or successors.
Agency. The Rural Business-Cooperative Service or successor for the
programs it administers.
Agricultural commodity. An unprocessed product of farms, ranches,
nurseries, and forests and natural and man-made bodies of water to
which the producer has legal access. Agricultural commodities include
any product
[[Page 29925]]
cultivated, raised, or harvested by the producer. Agricultural
commodities do not include horses or other animals raised or sold as
pets, such as cats, dogs, and ferrets.
Agricultural producer. An individual or entity directly engaged in
the production of an agricultural commodity that is the subject of the
value-added project.
Agricultural producer group. A membership organization that
represents independent producers and whose mission includes working on
behalf of independent producers and the majority of whose membership
and board of directors is comprised of independent producers.
Agricultural product. Plant and animal products and their by-
products to include crops (including farming); livestock (including
ranching); forestry products; hydroponics; nursery stock; aquaculture;
and fish and seafood products.
Anticipated award date. A date when the Agency expects to announce
applications selected to receive grant funding.
Beginning farmer or rancher. This term has the meaning given it in
section 343(a) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7
U.S.C. 1991(a)) and is an entity in which none of the individual owners
have operated a farm or a ranch for more than 10 years. For the
purposes of this subpart, a Beginning Farmer or Rancher must currently
own and produce the agricultural commodity to which value will be
added.
Business plan. A formal statement of a set of business goals, the
reasons why they are believed attainable, and the plan for reaching
those goals, including pro forma financial statements appropriate to
the term and scope of the project and sufficient to evidence the
viability of the venture. It may also contain background information
about the organization or team attempting to reach those goals.
Conflict of interest. A situation in which a person or entity has
competing professional or personal interests that make it difficult for
the person or business to act impartially. An example is a grant
recipient or an employee of a recipient that conducts or significantly
participates in conducting a feasibility study for the recipient.
Day. Calendar day, unless otherwise stated.
Departmental regulations. The regulations of the Department of
Agriculture's Office of Chief Financial Officer (or successor office)
as codified in 7 CFR parts 3000 through 3099, including, but not
necessarily limited to, 7 CFR parts 3015 through 3019, 7 CFR part 3021,
and 7 CFR part 3052, and successor regulations to these parts.
Emerging market. A new or developing product that is new to the
applicant or the applicant's product.
Family Farm. The term has the meaning given it in section 761.2 of
title 7, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on December 30,
2007), in effect that, a Family Farm produces agricultural commodities
for sale in sufficient quantity to be recognized as a farm and not a
rural residence, owners are primarily responsible for daily physical
labor and management, hired help only supplements family labor, and
owners are related by blood or marriage or are immediate family.
Farm or ranch. Any place from which $1,000 or more of agricultural
products were raised and sold or would have been raised and sold during
the previous year, but for an event beyond the control of the farmer or
rancher.
Farmer or rancher cooperative. A business owned and controlled by
agricultural producers that is incorporated, or otherwise identified by
the state in which it operates, as a cooperatively operated business.
Feasibility study. An analysis by a qualified consultant of the
economic, market, technical, financial, and management capabilities of
a proposed project or business in terms of the project's expectation
for success.
Financial feasibility. The ability of a project or business to
achieve the income, credit, and cash flows to financially sustain a
venture over the long term.
Fiscal year. The Federal government's fiscal year.
Immediate family. Individuals who are closely related by blood,
marriage, or adoption, or live within the same household, such as a
spouse, domestic partner, parent, child, brother, sister, aunt, uncle,
grandparent, grandchild, niece, or nephew.
Independent producers.
(1) Individual agricultural producers or entities that are solely
owned or controlled by agricultural producers. Independent producers
must produce and own a majority of the agricultural commodity to which
value is being added and that is the subject of the project proposal.
Independent producers must maintain ownership of the agricultural
commodity or product from its raw state through the production of the
value-added product. Producers who produce the agricultural commodity
under contract for another entity, but do not own the product produced
are not considered independent producers. Entities that contract out
the production of an agricultural commodity are not considered
independent producers.
(2) A steering committee composed of specifically identified
agricultural producers in the process of organizing an eligible entity
to operate a value-added venture that will be owned or controlled by
those specifically identified agricultural producers supplying the
agricultural product to the market. The steering committee must have
formed the eligible entity by the time of award.
Local or regional supply network. An interconnected group of
entities through which agricultural based products move from production
through consumption in a local or regional area of the United States.
Examples of participants in a supply network may include agricultural
producers, processors, distributors, wholesalers, retailers, consumers,
and entities that organize or provide technical assistance for
development of such networks.
Locally-produced agricultural food product. Any agricultural food
product that is raised, produced, and distributed in:
(1) The locality or region in which the final product is marketed,
so that the total distance that the product is transported is less than
400 miles from the origin of the product; or
(2) The State in which the product is produced.
Majority-controlled producer-based business venture. An entity
(except farmer or rancher cooperatives) in which more than 50 percent
of the financial ownership and voting control is held by independent
producers.
Marketing plan. A plan for the project conducted by a qualified
consultant that identifies a market window, potential buyers, a
description of the distribution system and possible promotional
campaigns.
Matching funds. A cost-sharing contribution to the project via
confirmed cash or funding commitments from eligible sources without a
conflict of interest, that are used for eligible project purposes
during the grant period. Eligible matching funds include confirmed
applicant cash, loan or line of credit, non-Federal grant sources
(unless otherwise provided by law), and third-party cash or eligible
third-party in-kind contributions. Matching funds must be at least
equal to the grant amount, and combined grant and matching funds must
equal 100 percent of the total project costs. All eligible cash and
third-party in-kind matching funds contributions must be spent on
eligible expenses during the grant period, and are subject to the same
[[Page 29926]]
use restrictions as grant funds. Matching funds must be spent at a rate
equal to or greater than the rate at which grant funds are expended,
and if matching funds are proposed in an amount exceeding the grant
amount, those matching funds must be spent at a proportional rate
equaling the match-to-grant ratio identified in the budget. Expected
program income may not be used to fulfill the matching funds
requirement at time of application. Further, funds used for an
ineligible purpose, contributions donated outside the proposed grant
period, and in-kind contributions that are invalid, over-valued or
include potential for a conflict of interest are not acceptable
matching funds. All matching funds must be verified by authentic
documentation from the source as part of the application.
Medium-sized farm. A farm or ranch that has averaged between
$250,001 and $700,000 in annual gross sales of agricultural products in
the previous three years.
Mid-tier value chain. Local and regional supply networks that link
independent producers with businesses and cooperatives that market
value-added agricultural products in a manner that:
(1) Targets and strengthens the profitability and competitiveness
of small and medium-sized farms and ranches that are structured as a
family farm; and
(2) Obtains agreement from an eligible agricultural producer group,
farmer or rancher cooperative, or majority-controlled producer-based
business venture that is engaged in the value chain on a marketing
strategy.
(3) For mid-tier value chain projects the Agency recognizes that,
in a supply chain network, a variety of raw agricultural commodity and
value-added product ownership and transfer arrangements may be
necessary. Consequently, applicant ownership of the raw agricultural
commodity and value-added product from raw through value-added is not
necessarily required, as long as the mid-tier value chain proposal can
demonstrate an increase in customer base and an increase in revenue
returns to the applicant producers supplying the majority of the raw
agricultural commodity for the project.
Planning grant. A grant to facilitate the development of a defined
program of economic planning activities to determine the viability of a
potential value-added venture, and specifically for the purpose of
paying for a qualified (third-party) consultant to conduct and develop
a feasibility study, business plan, and/or marketing plan associated
with the processing and/or marketing of a value-added agricultural
product.
Product segregation. Separating an agricultural commodity or
product on the same farm from other varieties of the same commodity or
product on the same farm during production and harvesting, with
assurance of continued separation from similar products during
processing and marketing in a manner that results in the enhancement of
the value of the separated commodity or product.
Pro forma financial statement. A financial statement that projects
the future financial position of a company. The statement is part of
the business plan and includes an explanation of all assumptions, such
as input prices, finished product prices, and other economic factors
used to generate the financial statements. The statement must include
projections in the form of cash flow statements, income statements, and
balance sheets.
Project. All activities to be funded by grant and matching funds.
Qualified consultant. An independent, third-party possessing the
knowledge, expertise, and experience to perform the specific task
required in an efficient, effective, and authoritative manner.
Rural Development. A mission area of the Under Secretary for Rural
Development within the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which
includes Rural Housing Service, Rural Utilities Service, and Rural
Business-Cooperative Service and their successors.
Rural or rural area. Any area of a State not in a city or town that
has a population of more than 50,000 inhabitants, according to the
latest decennial census of the United States, and the contiguous and
adjacent urbanized area, and any area that has been determined to be
``rural in character'' by the Under Secretary for Rural Development, or
as otherwise identified in this definition. In determining which census
blocks in an urbanized area are not in a rural area, the Agency will
exclude any cluster of census blocks that would otherwise be considered
not in a Rural Area only because the cluster is adjacent to not more
than two census blocks that are otherwise considered not in a rural
area under this definition.
(1) For the purposes of this definition, cities and towns are
incorporated population centers with definite boundaries, local self
government, and legal powers set forth in a charter granted by the
State.
(2) For the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the island is considered
rural and eligible for Business Programs assistance, except for the San
Juan Census Designated Place (CDP) and any other CDP with greater than
50,000 inhabitants. CDPs with greater than 50,000 inhabitants, other
than the San Juan CDP, may be determined to be eligible if they are
``not urban in character.'' Any such requests must be forwarded to the
National Office, Business and Industry Division, with supporting
documentation as to why the area is ``not urban in character'' for
review, analysis, and decision by the Rural Development Under
Secretary.
(3) For the State of Hawaii, all areas within the State are
considered rural and eligible for Business Programs assistance, except
for the Honolulu CDP within the County of Honolulu.
(4) For the purpose of defining a rural area in the Republic of
Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the
Marshall Islands, the Agency shall determine what constitutes rural and
rural area based on available population data.
(5) The determination that an area is ``rural in character'' under
this definition will be to areas that are within:
(i) An urbanized area that has two points on its boundary that are
at least 40 miles apart, which is not contiguous or adjacent to a city
or town that has a population of greater than 150,000 inhabitants or
the urbanized area of such a city town; or
(ii) An urbanized area contiguous and adjacent to a city or town of
greater than 50,000 population that is within one-quarter mile of a
rural area.
Small farm. A farm or ranch that has averaged $250,000 or less in
annual gross sales of agricultural products in the previous three
years.
Socially disadvantaged farmer or rancher. This term has the meaning
given it in section 355(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2003(e)). A farmer or rancher who is a member
of a ``socially disadvantaged group.'' In this definition, the term
farmer or rancher means a person that is engaged in farming or ranching
or an entity solely owned by individuals who are engaged in farming or
ranching. A socially disadvantaged group means a group whose members
have been subjected to racial, ethnic, or gender prejudice because of
their identity as members of a group without regard to their individual
qualities. In the event that there are multiple farmer or rancher
owners of the applicant organization, the Agency requires that at least
51 percent of the ownership be held by
[[Page 29927]]
members of a socially disadvantaged group.
State. Any of the 50 States of the United States, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of Palau,
the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of the Marshall
Islands.
State director. The term ``State Director'' means, with respect to
a State, the Director of the Rural Development State Office.
State office. USDA Rural Development offices located in each state.
Total project cost. The sum of all grant and matching funds in the
project budget that reflects the eligible project tasks associated with
the work plan.
Value-added agricultural product. Any agricultural commodity or
product that meets the requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2)
of this definition.
(1) The agricultural commodity or product must meet one of the
following five value-added methodologies:
(i) Has undergone a change in physical state;
(ii) Was produced in a manner that enhances the value of the
agricultural commodity or product;
(iii) Is physically segregated in a manner that results in the
enhancement of the value of the agricultural commodity or product;
(iv) Is a source of farm- or ranch-based renewable energy,
including E-85 fuel; or
(v) Is aggregated and marketed as a locally-produced agricultural
food product.
(2) As a result of the change in physical state or the manner in
which the agricultural commodity or product was produced, marketed, or
segregated:
(i) The customer base for the agricultural commodity or product is
expanded and
(ii) A greater portion of the revenue derived from the marketing,
processing, or physical segregation of the agricultural commodity or
product is available to the producer of the commodity or product.
Venture. The business, including the project and other related
activities.
Working capital grant. A grant to provide funds to operate a value-
added project, specifically to pay the eligible project expenses
related to the processing and/or marketing of the value-added product
that are eligible uses of grant funds.
Sec. 4284.903 Review or appeal rights.
A person may seek a review of an Agency decision under this subpart
from the appropriate Agency official that oversees the program in
question or appeal to the National Appeals Division in accordance with
7 CFR part 11.
Sec. 4284.904 Exception authority.
Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, the
Administrator may make exceptions to any requirement or provision of
this subpart, if such exception is necessary to implement the intent of
the authorizing statute in a time of national emergency or in
accordance with a Presidentially-declared disaster, or, on a case-by-
case basis, when such an exception is in the best financial interests
of the Federal Government and is otherwise not in conflict with
applicable laws.
(a) Applicant eligibility. No exception to applicant eligibility
can be made.
(b) Project eligibility. No exception to project eligibility can be
made.
Sec. 4284.905 Nondiscrimination and compliance with other Federal
laws.
(a) Other Federal laws. Applicants must comply with other
applicable Federal laws, including the Equal Employment Opportunities
Act of 1972, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975,
and 7 CFR part 1901-E.
(b) Nondiscrimination. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the
basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where
applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status,
religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs,
reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived
from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to
all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means
for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600
(voice and TDD). Any applicant that believes it has been discriminated
against as a result of applying for funds under this program should
contact: USDA, Director, Office of Adjudication and Compliance, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-
3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD) for information and instructions
regarding the filing of a Civil Rights complaint. USDA is an equal
opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
(c) Civil rights compliance. Recipients of grants must comply with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. This includes collection and maintenance of
data on the basis of race, sex and national origin of the recipient's
membership/ownership and employees. These data must be available to
conduct compliance reviews in accordance with 7 CFR part 1901, subpart
E. For grants initial compliance review will be conducted after Form RD
400-4, ``Assurance Agreement,'' is signed and one subsequent compliance
review after the last disbursement of grant funds have been made, and
the facility or programs been in full operations for 90 days.
(d) Executive Order 12898. When a project is proposed and financial
assistance is requested, the Agency will conduct a Civil Rights Impact
Analysis (CRIA) with regards to environmental justice. The CRIA must be
conducted and the analysis documented utilizing Form RD 2006-38,
``Civil Right Impact Analysis Certification.'' This certification must
be done prior to grant approval, obligation of funds, or other
commitments of Agency resources, including issuance of a Letter of
Conditions, whichever occurs first.
Sec. 4284.906 State laws, local laws, regulatory commission
regulations.
If there are conflicts between this subpart and State or local laws
or regulatory commission regulations, the provisions of this subpart
will control.
Sec. 4284.907 Environmental requirements.
All grants awarded under this subpart are subject to the
environmental requirements in subpart G of 7 CFR part 1940 or successor
regulations. Applications for planning grants are generally excluded
from the environmental review process by Sec. 1940.333 of this title.
Applicants for working capital grants must submit Form 1940-22,
Categorical Exclusion Checklist.
Sec. 4284.908 Incorporation by reference.
(a) Departmental regulations. Unless specifically stated, this
subpart incorporates by reference the regulations of the Department of
Agriculture's Office of Chief Financial Officer (or successor office)
as codified in 7 CFR parts 3000 through 3099, including, but not
necessarily limited to, 7 CFR parts 3015 through 3019, 7 CFR part 3021,
and 7 CFR part 3052, and successor regulations to these parts.
(b) Cost principles. This subpart incorporates by reference the
cost
[[Page 29928]]
principles found in 2 CFR part 230 and in 48 CFR part 31.2.
(c) Definitions. If a term is defined differently in the
Departmental Regulations, 2 CFR 230, or 48 CRF 31.2 and in this
subpart, such term shall have the meaning as found in this subpart.
Sec. 4284.909 Forms, regulations, and instructions.
Copies of all forms, regulations, instructions, and other materials
related to the program referenced in this subpart may be obtained
through the Agency.
Sec. Sec. 4284.910-4284.914 [Reserved]
Section B--Funding and Programmatic Change Notifications
Sec. 4284.915 Notifications.
In implementing this subpart, the Agency will issue notifications
addressing funding and programmatic changes, as specified in paragraphs
(a) and (b) of this section, respectively. The methods that the Agency
will use in making these notifications is specified in paragraph (c) of
this section, and the timing of these notifications is specified in
paragraph (d) of this section.
(a) Funding and simplified applications. The Agency will issue
notifications concerning:
(1) The funding level and the minimum and maximum grant amount and
any additional funding information as determined by the Agency; and
(2) The contents of simplified applications, as provided for in
Sec. 4284.932.
(b) Programmatic changes. The Agency will issue notifications of
the programmatic changes specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of
this section.
(1) The set of Administrator priority categories or their point
allocation, if the provisions specified in Sec. 4284.942(b)(6) are not
to be used for awarding Administrator points. Administrator priorities
that the program may consider are:
(i) Unserved or underserved areas.
(ii) Geographic diversity.
(iii) Emergency conditions.
(iv) To more effectively accomplish the mission area's plans,
goals, and objectives.
(v) Public health and safety.
(2) Additional reports that are generally applicable across
projects within a program associated with the monitoring of and
reporting on project performance.
(3) Any information specified in Sec. 4284.933.
(4) Preliminary review information.
(c) Notification methods. The Agency will issue the information
specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) in one or more Federal Register
notices. In addition, all information will be available at any Rural
Development office.
(d) Timing. The Agency will make the information specified in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section available as specified in
paragraphs (d)(1) through (3) of this section.
(1) The Agency will make the information specified in paragraph (a)
of this section available each fiscal year.
(2) The Agency will make the information specified in paragraphs
(b)(1) of this section available at least 60 days prior to the
application deadline, as applicable.
(3) The Agency will make the information specified in paragraphs
(b)(2) through (4) of this section available on an as needed basis.
Sec. Sec. 4284.916-4284.919 [Reserved]
Section C--Eligibility
Sec. 4284.920 Applicant eligibility.
To be eligible for a grant under this subpart, an applicant must
demonstrate that they meet the requirements specified in paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section, as applicable, and are subject to the
limitations specified in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section.
(a) Type of applicant. The applicant must demonstrate that they
meet all definition requirements for one of the following applicant
types:
(1) An independent producer;
(2) An agricultural producer group;
(3) A farmer or rancher cooperative; or
(4) A majority-controlled producer-based business venture.
(b) Emerging market. An applicant that is an agricultural producer
group, a farmer or rancher cooperative, or a majority-controlled
producer-based business venture must demonstrate that they are entering
into an emerging market as a result of the proposed project.
(c) Citizenship.
(1) Individual applicants must demonstrate that they:
(i) Are citizens or nationals of the United States (U.S.), the
Republic of Palau, the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of
the Marshall Islands, or American Samoa, or
(ii) Reside in the U.S. after legal admittance for permanent
residence.
(2) Entities other than individuals must demonstrate that they are
at least 51 percent owned by individuals who are either citizens as
identified under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section or legally
admitted permanent residents residing in the U.S. This paragraph is not
applicable if the entity is owned solely by members of one immediate
family. In such instance, if at least one of the immediate family
members is a citizen or national, as defined in paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, then the entity is eligible.
(d) Legal authority and responsibility. Each applicant must
demonstrate that they have, or can obtain, the legal authority
necessary to carry out the purpose of the grant.
(e) Multiple grant eligibility. An applicant may submit only one
application in response to this notice, and must direct that it compete
in either the general funds competition or in one of the reserved funds
competitions. Separate entities with identical or greater than 75
percent common ownership may only submit one application for one entity
per year. Applicants who have already received a planning grant for the
proposed project cannot receive another planning grant for the same
project. Applicants who have already received a working capital grant
for the proposed project cannot receive any additional grants for that
project.
(f) Active VAPG grant. If an applicant has an active value-added
grant at the time of a subsequent application, the current grant must
be closed out within 90 days of the annual NOFA.
Sec. 4284.921 Ineligible applicants.
(a) Consistent with the Departmental regulations, an applicant is
ineligible if the applicant is debarred or suspended or is otherwise
excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance
programs under Executive Order 12549, ``Debarment and Suspension.''
(b) An applicant will be considered ineligible for a grant due to
an outstanding judgment obtained by the U.S. in a Federal Court (other
than U.S. Tax Court), is delinquent on the payment of Federal income
taxes, or is delinquent on Federal debt.
Sec. 4284.922 Project eligibility.
To be eligible for a VAPG grant, the application must demonstrate
that the project meets the requirements specified in paragraphs (a)
through (d) of this section, as applicable.
(a) Product eligibility. Each product that is the subject of the
proposed project must meet the definition of a value-added agricultural
product, including a demonstration that:
(1) The value-added product results from one of the value-added
methodologies identified in paragraphs
[[Page 29929]]
(1)(i) through (v) of the definition of value-added agricultural
product;
(2) As a result of the project, the customer base for the
agricultural commodity or product is expanded; and
(3) As a result of the project, a greater portion of the revenue
derived from the marketing or processing of the value-added product is
available to the agricultural producer of the commodity or product.
(b) Purpose eligibility.
(1) The grant funds requested must not exceed the amount specified
annually for planning and working capital grant requests.
(2) The matching funds required for the project budget must be
available during the project period and verified in the application.
(3) The proposed project must be limited to eligible planning or
working capital activities as defined at Sec. 4284.923, as applicable,
with eligible tasks directly related to the processing and/or marketing
of the subject value-added product.
(4) The project work plan and budget must:
(i) Present a detailed breakdown of all estimated costs associated
with the eligible planning or working capital activities related to the
processing and/or marketing of the value-added product and allocate
those costs among the listed tasks;
(ii) Identify the sources and uses of grant and matching funds for
all tasks specified in the budget; and
(iii) Present a project budget period of not longer than 36 months,
scaled to complexity, and concluding not later than 3 years after the
proposed start date.
(5) Working capital applications must include a feasibility study
and business plan completed specifically for the proposed value-added
project by a qualified consultant. The Agency must concur in the
acceptability or adequacy