Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel Management Demonstration Project, Department of Navy (DON), Office of Naval Research (ONR), 30198-30241 [2010-12690]
Download as PDF
30198
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Science and Technology Reinvention
Laboratory Personnel Management
Demonstration Project, Department of
Navy (DON), Office of Naval Research
(ONR)
AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense (Civilian Personnel
Policy) (DUSD (CPP)), (DoD)
ACTION: Notice of proposal to adopt a
demonstration project plan and
additional flexibilities.
SUMMARY: The Office of Naval Research
(ONR) proposes to adopt the Naval
Research Laboratory (NRL) Personnel
Management Demonstration Project
with modifications and one flexibility
from the U.S. Army Aviation and
Missile Research, Development and
Engineering Center (AMRDEC). The
majority of flexibilities and
administrative procedures are expected
to be adopted without changes.
However, modifications are made when
necessary to address ONR’s specific
organizational, workforce, and approval
needs; technical modifications to
conform to changes in the law and
governing Office of Personnel
Management (OPM) regulations, which
are not being waived, that were effected
after the publication of the NRL
personnel demonstration project plan;
and changes in response to comments
received during the 30-day comment
period.
DATES: ONR’s adoption proposal may
not be implemented until a 30-day
comment period is provided, comments
addressed, and a final Federal Register
notice published. To be considered,
written comments must be submitted on
or before June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on or
before the comment due date by mail to
Ms. Betty A. Duffield, CPMS–PSSC,
Suite B–200, 1400 Key Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22209–5144; by fax to
(703) 696–5462; or by e-mail to
Betty.Duffield@cpms.osd.mil.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Office of Naval Research: Ms. Margaret
J. Mitchell, Director, Human Resources
Office, Office of Naval Research, 875
North Randolph Street, Code 01HR,
Arlington, VA 22203;
Margaret.J.Mitchell@navy.mil.
DoD: Ms. Betty A. Duffield, CPMS–
PSSC, Suite B–200, 1400 Key
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209–5144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
342(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Year (FY) 1995, Public Law 103–337, as
amended (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) by
section 1109 of NDAA FY 2000, Public
Law 106–65, and section 1114 of NDAA
FY 2001, Public Law 106–398,
authorizes the Secretary of Defense
(SECDEF) to conduct personnel
management demonstration projects at
DoD laboratories designated as Science
and Technology Reinvention
Laboratories (STRLs). Section 1107 of
NDAA FY 2008, Public Law 110–181, as
amended by section 1109 of NDAA FY
2009, Public Law 110–417, requires the
SECDEF to execute a process and plan
to employ the personnel management
demonstration project authorities
granted to the Office of Personnel
Management under title 5 United States
Code (U.S.C.) section 4703 at the STRLs
previously enumerated in 5 U.S.C.
9902(c)(2), and now redesignated in
section 1105 of NDAA FY 2010, Public
Law 111–84, 123 Stat. 2486, and 73 FR
73248, to enhance the performance of
the missions of the laboratories. Section
1107 of Public Law 110–181 further
authorizes in subsection 1107(c) that
any flexibility available to any
demonstration laboratory shall be
available for use at any other laboratory
as previously enumerated in title 5
U.S.C. 9902(c)(2). The Office of Naval
Research (ONR) is listed as one of the
previously designated 5 U.S.C.
9902(c)(2) STRLs.
1. Background
Since 1966, many studies of
Department of Defense (DoD)
laboratories have been conducted on
laboratory quality and personnel.
Almost all of these studies have
recommended improvements in the
civilian personnel policy, organization,
and management. Pursuant to the
authority provided in section 342(b) of
Public Law 103–337, as amended, a
number of DoD STRL personnel
demonstration projects were approved.
These projects are ‘‘generally similar in
nature’’ to the Department of Navy’s
‘‘China Lake’’ Personnel Demonstration
Project. The terminology, ‘‘generally
similar in nature,’’ does not imply an
emulation of various features, but rather
implies a similar opportunity and
authority to develop personnel
flexibilities that significantly increase
the decision authority of laboratory
department heads and/or directors.
This demonstration project involves:
(1) Streamlined delegated examining; (2)
noncitizen hiring; (3) expanded detail
authority; (4) extended probationary
period for newly hired employees; (5)
expanded temporary promotion; (6)
voluntary emeritus program; (7)
paybanding; (8) contribution-based
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
compensation system; (9) performancebased reduction-in-pay or removal
actions; and (10) reduction-in-force
(RIF) procedures.
2. Overview
DoD published notice in 73 FR 73248,
December 2, 2008, that pursuant to
subsection 1107(c) of Public Law 110–
181, the three STRLs listed in 73 FR
73248 not having personnel
demonstration projects at that time may
adopt the flexibilities of the other
laboratories previously listed in
subsection 9902(c)(2) and now
redesignated in section 1105 of Public
Law 111–84. ONR is one of the three
STRLs specified in this provision.
Accordingly, ONR intends to build its
demonstration project using flexibilities
adopted from existing STRL
demonstration projects (specifically
NRL and AMRDEC). Final plans for the
NRL and AMRDEC personnel
management demonstration projects
were published in the Federal Register
as follows:
• Department of the Navy: NRL—64
FR 33970, June 24, 1999. No
amendments have been published; and
• Department of the Army:
AMRDEC—62 FR 34876 and 62 FR
34906, June 27, 1997; and amendments
and/or corrections to final plans
published—64 FR 11074, March 8,
1999; 64 FR 12216, March 11, 1999; 65
FR 53142, August 31, 2000; and 67 FR
5716, February 6, 2002.
3. Access to Flexibilities of Other STRLs
Flexibilities published in this Federal
Register notice shall be available for use
by the STRLs previously enumerated in
5 U.S.C. 9902(c)(2), now redesignated in
section 1105 of Public Law 111–84, if
they wish to adopt them in accordance
with DoD Instruction 1400.37; 73 FR
73248 to 73252; and after the fulfilling
of any collective bargaining obligations.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems with the Current System
C. Waivers Required
D. Expected Benefits
E. Participating Organizations and
Employees
F. Project Design
III. Accessions and Internal Placements
A. Hiring Authority
1. Background
2. Delegated Examining
B. Legal Authority
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
C. Determining Employee and Applicant
Qualifications
D. Noncitizen Hiring
E. Expanded Detail Authority
F. Extended Probationary Period
G. Definitions
1. Basic Pay
2. Maintained Pay
3. Promotion
4. Reassignment
5. Change to Lower Pay Band
6. Pay Adjustment
7. Detail
8. Highest Previous Rate
9. Approving Manager
H. Pay Setting Determinations Outside the
CCS
1. External New Hires
2. Internal Actions
a. Promotion.
b. Pay Adjustment (Voluntary Change to
Lower Pay) or Change to Lower Pay Band
(except RIF).
c. Pay Adjustment (Involuntary Change to
Lower Pay) or Change to Lower Pay Band
Due to Adverse or Performance-based
Action.
d. Involuntary Change to Lower Pay Band
or Reassignment to a Career Track with
a Lower Salary Range, Other than
Adverse or Performance-based.
e. RIF Action (including employees who
are offered and accept a vacancy at a
lower pay band or in a different career
track).
f. Upward Mobility or Other Formal
Training Program Selection.
g. Return to Limited or Light Duty from a
Disability as a Result of Occupational
Injury to a Position in a Lower Pay Band
or to a Career Track with Lower Basic
Pay Potential than Held Prior to the
Injury.
h. Restoration to Duty.
i. Reassignment.
j. Student Educational Employment
Program.
k. Hazard Pay or Pay for Duty Involving
Physical Hardship.
I. Priority Placement Program (PPP)
J. Expanded Temporary Promotion
K. Voluntary Emeritus Program
IV. Sustainment
A. Position Classification
1. Career Tracks and Pay Bands
a. Target Pay Band.
b. Occupational Series and Position
Titling.
c. Classification Standards.
d. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
(1) Guidelines for FLSA Determinations.
(2) Nonsupervisory and Leader Positions.
(3) Supervisory Positions.
2. Requirements Document (RD)
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
a. Delegated Authority.
b. Position Classification Accountability.
B. Integrated Pay Schedule
1. Annual Pay Action
2. Overtime Pay
3. Classification Appeals
4. Above GS–15 Positions
5. Distinguished Contributions Allowance
(DCA)
a. Eligibility.
b. Nomination.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
c. Reduction or Termination of a DCA.
d. Lump-Sum DCA Payments.
e. DCA Budget Allocation.
f. Concurrent Monetary Payments.
C. Contribution-Based Compensation
System (CCS)
1. General
2. CCS Process
3. Pay Pool Annual Planning
a. Element Weights and Applicability.
b. Supplemental Criteria.
4. Annual CCS Appraisal Process (See
Figure 7.)
5. Exceptions
6. Normal Pay Range (NPR)—Basic Pay
Versus Contribution
7. Compensation
a. General Increases.
b. Merit Increases.
c. Locality Increases.
d. Contribution Awards.
8. Career Movement Based on CCS
a. Advancements in Level Which May be
Approved by the Pay Pool Manager.
b. Advancements in Level Which Must be
Approved by the Chief of Naval Research
(CNR).
c. Advancement to Level V of the Science
and Engineering (S&E) Professional
Career Track.
9. CCS Grievance Procedures
V. Separations
A. Performance-based Reduction-in-Pay or
Removal Actions
B. Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Procedures
1. RIF Authority
2. RIF Definitions
a. Competition in RIF.
b. Competitive Area.
c. Competitive Level.
d. Service Computation Date (SCD).
(1). Federal SCD.
(2) CCS Process Results.
(3). Credit from Other Rating Systems.
(4) RIF Cutoff Date.
3. Displacement Rights
a. Displacement Process
b. Retention Standing
c. Vacant Positions
d. Ineligible for Displacement Rights
e. Change to Lower Level due to an
Adverse or Performance-based Action
4. Notice Period
5. RIF Appeals
6. Separation Incentives
7. Severance Pay
8. Outplacement Assistance
VI. Demonstration Project Transition
A.Initial Conversion or Movement to the
Demonstration Project
1. Placement into Career Tracks and Pay
Bands
2.Conversion of retained grade and pay
employees
3. WGI Buy-In
4. Career Promotion Eligibility
5. Conversion of Special Salary Rate
Employees
6. Conversion of Employees on Temporary
Promotions
7. Non-competitive Movement into the
Demonstration Project
B. CCS Start-Up
C. Training
1. Types of Training
a. Employees.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30199
b. Supervisors and Managers.
c. Support Personnel.
D. New Hires into the Demonstration
Project
E. Conversion or Movement from
Demonstration Project
1. Grade Determination.
2. Pay Setting
3. Employees in Positions Classified Above
GS–15
4. Determining Date of Last Equivalent
Increase
C. Personnel Administration
D. Automation
E. Experimentation and Revision
VII. Demonstration Project Duration
VIII. Demonstration Project Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
B. Evaluation Model
IX. Demonstration Project Costs
A. Cost Discipline
B. Implementation Costs
X. Automation Support
A. General
B. Defense Civilian Personnel Data System
(DCPDS)
C. Core Document (COREDOC)
D. RIF Support System (RIFSS)
E. Contribution-based Compensation
System Data System
Appendix A. Summary of Demonstration
Project Features Adopted by ONR
Appendix B: Required Waivers to Laws and
Regulations
Appendix C: Definitions of Career Tracks and
Pay Bands
Appendix D: Table of Occupational Series
Within Career Tracks
Appendix E: Classification and CCS Elements
Appendix F: Computation of the IPS and the
NPR
Appendix G: Intervention Model
I. Executive Summary
This project adopts with some
modifications the STRL personnel
management demonstration project
designed by NRL and an additional
flexibility from the AMRDEC personnel
management demonstration project. The
modified design of the demonstration
project described herein was developed
by ONR with the participation of and
review by the DON, the DoD, and
incorporation of the knowledge and
design of other STRL demonstration
projects.
The ONR coordinates, executes, and
promotes the science and technology
programs of the United States Navy and
Marine Corps. ONR’s directorates
balance a robust science and technology
portfolio, allocating funds to meet the
warfighter’s requirements, focusing
efforts on all three major phases of
development funding: basic research,
applied research, and advanced
technology development. ONR’s six
science and technology departments
coordinate and execute research in the
areas of:
1. Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare
and Combating Terrorism
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30200
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
2. Command, Control,
Communications, Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance
3. Ocean Battlespace Sensing
4. Sea Warfare and Weapons
5. Warfighter Performance
6. Naval Air Warfare and Weapons
In order to sustain these unique
capabilities, ONR must be able to hire,
retain, and continually motivate
enthusiastic, innovative, and highlyeducated scientists and engineers,
supported by accomplished business
management and administrative
professionals as well as a skilled
administrative and technical support
staff.
The goal of the project is to enhance
the quality and professionalism of the
ONR workforce through improvements
in the efficiency and effectiveness of the
human resource system. The project
flexibilities will strive to achieve the
best workforce for the ONR mission,
adjust the workforce for change, and
improve organizational efficiency. The
results of the project will be evaluated
within five years of implementation
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the project is to
demonstrate that the effectiveness of
DoD STRLs can be enhanced by
expanding opportunities available to
employees and by allowing greater
managerial control over personnel
functions through a more responsive
and flexible personnel system. Federal
laboratories need more efficient, cost
effective, and timely processes and
methods to acquire and retain a highly
creative, productive, educated, and
trained workforce. This project, in its
entirety, attempts to improve
employees’ opportunities and provide
managers, at the lowest practical level,
the authority, control, and flexibility
needed to achieve the highest quality
organization and hold them accountable
for the proper exercise of this authority
within the framework of an improved
personnel management system.
Many aspects of a demonstration
project are experimental. Modifications
may be made from time to time as
experience is gained, results are
analyzed, and conclusions are reached
on how the system is working. The
provisions of this project plan will not
be modified, or extended to individuals
or groups of employees not included in
the project plan without the approval of
the ODUSD(CPP). The provisions of
DoDI 1400.37, are to be followed for any
modifications, adoptions, or changes to
this demonstration project plan.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
B. Problems With the Current System
The current Civil Service GS system
has existed in essentially the same form
since the 1920’s. Work is classified into
one of fifteen overlapping pay ranges
that correspond with the fifteen grades.
Base pay is set at one of those fifteen
grades and the ten interim steps within
each grade. The Classification Act of
1949 rigidly defines types of work by
occupational series and grade, with very
precise qualifications for each job. This
system does not quickly or easily
respond to new ways of designing work
or to changes in the work itself.
The performance management model
that has existed since the passage of the
Civil Service Reform Act has come
under extreme criticism. Employees
frequently report there is inadequate
communication of performance
expectations and feedback on
performance. There are perceived
inaccuracies in performance ratings
with general agreement that the ratings
are inflated and often unevenly
distributed by grade, occupation, and
geographic location.
The need to change the current hiring
system is essential as ONR must be able
to recruit and retain scientific,
engineering, acquisition support and
other professionals, and skilled
technicians. ONR must be able to
compete with the private sector for the
best talent and be able to make job offers
in a timely manner with the attendant
bonuses and incentives to attract high
quality employees.
Finally, current limitations on
training, retraining, and otherwise
developing employees make it difficult
to correct skill imbalances and to
prepare current employees for new lines
of work to meet changing missions and
emerging technologies.
C. Waivers Required
ONR proposes changes in the
following broad areas to address its
problems in human resources
management: Accessions and internal
placements, sustainment, and
separations. Appendix B lists the laws,
rules, and regulations requiring waivers
to enable ONR to implement the
proposed systems. All personnel laws,
rules, and regulations not waived by
this plan will remain in effect. Basic
employee rights will be safeguarded and
Merit System Principles will be
maintained.
D. Expected Benefits
The primary benefit expected from
this demonstration project is greater
organizational effectiveness through
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
increased employee satisfaction. The
long-standing Department of the Navy
‘‘China Lake’’ and the National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST)
demonstration projects have produced
impressive statistics on increased job
satisfaction and quality of employees
versus that for the Federal workforce in
general. This project will demonstrate
that a human resource system tailored to
the mission and needs of the ONR
workforce will facilitate:
(1) Sustainment of ONR’s quality
scientific and business management
workforces in today’s competitive
environment;
(2) Improved employee satisfaction
with pay setting and adjustment,
recognition, and career advancement
opportunities;
(3) Human Resources (HR) flexibilities
needed to staff and shape a quality
workforce of the next 10–20 years;
(4) Increased retention of high-level
contributors; and
(5) Simpler and more cost effective
HR management processes.
An evaluation model was developed
for the Director, Defense, Research and
Engineering (DDR&E) in conjunction
with STRL service representatives and
the OPM. The model will measure the
effectiveness of this demonstration
project, as modified in this plan, and
will be used to measure the results of
specific personnel system changes.
E. Participating Organizations and
Employees
ONR is comprised of the ONR
Headquarters in Arlington, Virginia, and
ONR employees geographically
dispersed at the locations shown in
Figure 1. It should be noted that some
sites currently have fewer than ten
people and that the sites may change
should ONR reorganize or realign.
Successor organizations will continue
coverage in the demonstration project.
The demonstration project will cover
approximately 450 ONR civilian
employees under title 5, U.S.C. in the
occupations listed in Appendix D. The
project plan does not cover members of
the Senior Executive Service (SES),
Senior Level (SL), Scientific and
Professional (ST), expert and consultant
employees (EH), or Administratively
Determined (AD) pay plans. However,
SES, SL, and ST employees, after
leaving Federal government service,
may participate in the Voluntary
Emeritus Program. There are no labor
unions representing ONR employees.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
In response to the initial authority
granted by Congress to develop a
demonstration project, ONR chartered a
design team to develop the project plan.
The team was led by a senior ONR
manager from outside the Human
Resources Office (HRO) and was
responsible for developing project
proposals. The team was composed of
20 employees of different grade levels
and in different occupations. There was
a mix of managers, supervisors, and
non-supervisors from offices throughout
ONR. The team had the assistance of HR
personnel from ONR and from NRL. It
also received information and advice
from OPM, the Office of the DUSD
(CPP), and a number of organizations
with on-going demonstration projects.
Information and suggestions were
solicited from ONR employees and
managers through interviews, briefings,
small-group meetings, and a suggestion
program established specifically for the
design effort. This plan was submitted
to DUSD (CPP) in 2001. Work on this
plan was postponed pending the
outcome of several Departmental HR
initiatives addressing new personnel
systems.
Following enactment of Public Law
110–181, ONR undertook an effort to
review and resubmit the demonstration
project plan. Upon extensive review and
discussion with internal and external
stakeholders, ONR leadership decided
to adopt existing flexibilities according
to subsection 1107(c) of Public Law
110–181, 73 FR 73248, and DoDI
1400.37. Specifically, ONR proposes to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
adopt the NRL demonstration project
plus an additional flexibility from the
AMRDEC demonstration project.
Appendix A summarizes the
modifications proposed for each of the
adopted project flexibilities and
administrative procedures.
Modifications to existing flexibilities are
made when necessary to address ONR’s
specific organizational, workforce, and
approval needs and technical
modifications to conform to changes in
the law and governing OPM regulations,
which are not being waived, that were
effected after the publication of the NRL
personnel demonstration project plan.
Further changes to the project plan may
be made in response to comments
received during the 30-day comment
period following publication of this
notice.
III. Accessions and Internal Placements
A. Hiring Authority
1. Background
Private industry and academia are the
principal recruiting sources for
scientists and engineers at ONR. It is
extremely difficult to make timely offers
of employment to hard-to-find scientists
and engineers. Even when a candidate
is identified, he or she often finds
another job opportunity before the
lengthy recruitment process can be
completed.
2. Delegated Examining
a. Competitive service positions
within the ONR Demonstration Project
will be filled through Merit Staffing or
under Delegated Examining.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
b. The ‘‘Rule of Three’’ will be
eliminated. When there are no more
than 15 qualified applicants and no
preference eligibles, all eligible
applicants are immediately referred to
the selecting official without rating and
ranking. Rating and ranking will be
required only when the number of
qualified candidates exceeds 15 or there
is a mix of preference and
nonpreference applicants. Statutes and
regulations covering veterans’
preference will be observed in the
selection process and when rating and
ranking are required. If the candidates
are rated and ranked, a random number
selection method using the application
control number will be used to
determine which applicants will be
referred when scores are tied after the
rating process. Veterans will be referred
ahead of non-veterans with the same
score.
B. Legal Authority
For actions taken under the auspices
of the ONR Demonstration Project, the
legal authority, Public Law 103–337,
will be used. For all other actions, ONR
will continue to use the nature of action
codes and legal authority codes
prescribed by OPM, DoD, or DON.
C. Determining Employee and Applicant
Qualifications
Figure 2 displays the minimum
General Schedule (GS) qualifications
requirements for each career path and
pay band level. Special DON or DoD
requirements not covered by the OPM
Qualification Standards Operating
Manual for GS Positions, such as
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.003
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
F. Project Design
30201
30202
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
acquisition positions, physical
performance requirements for sea duty,
work on board aircraft, etc., must be
met.
D. Noncitizen Hiring
Where Executive Orders or other
regulations limit hiring noncitizens,
ONR will have the authority to approve
the hiring of noncitizens into
competitive service positions when
qualified U.S. citizens are not available.
Under the demonstration project, as
with the current system, a noncitizen
may be appointed only if it has been
determined there are no qualified U.S.
citizens. In order to make this
determination, the position will be
advertised extensively throughout the
nation using paid advertisements in
major newspapers or scientific journals,
etc., as well as the ‘‘normal’’ recruiting
methods. If a noncitizen is the only
qualified candidate for the position, the
candidate may be appointed. The
selection is subject to approval by the
Department Head or Director of the
hiring organization. The demonstration
project constitutes a delegated
examining agreement from OPM for the
purposes of 5 CFR 213.3102(bb).
(1) To effect details up to one year to
demonstration project positions without
the current 120-day renewal
requirement; and
(2) To effect details to a higher level
position in the demonstration project up
to one year within a 24-month period
without competition.
Details beyond the one-year require
the approval of the Chief of Naval
Research or designee and are not subject
to the 120-day renewal requirement.
for the position held by an employee
including any merit increase but before
any deductions and exclusive of
additional pay of any other kind.
E. Expanded Detail Authority
Under the demonstration project,
ONR’s approving manager would have
the authority:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
F. Extended Probationary Period
All current laws and regulations for
the current probationary period are
retained except that nonstatus
candidates hired under the
demonstration project in occupations
where the nature of the work requires
the manager to have more than one year
to assess the employee’s job
performance will serve a three-year
probationary period. Employees with
veterans’ preference will maintain their
rights under current law and regulation.
G. Definitions
1. Basic Pay
The total amount of pay received at
the rate fixed through CCS adjustment
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
2. Maintained Pay
An employee may be entitled to
maintain his or her rate of basic pay if
that rate exceeds the maximum rate of
basic pay for his or her pay band as a
result of certain personnel actions (as
described in this plan). An employee’s
initial maintained pay rate is equal to
the lesser of (1) the basic pay held by
the employee at the time an action is
taken which entitles the employee to
maintain his or her pay or (2) 150
percent of the maximum rate of basic
pay of the pay band to which assigned.
The employee is entitled to maintained
pay for 2 years or until the employee’s
basic pay is equal to or more than the
employee’s maintained pay, whichever
occurs first. Exceptions to the 2-year
limit include employees on grade and
pay retention ‘‘grandfathered’’ in upon
initial conversion into the
demonstration project, former special
rate employees receiving maintained
pay as a result of conversion into the
project, and employees placed through
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.004
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Defense Acquisition Workforce
Improvement Act (DAWIA)
qualification requirements for
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
the priority placement programs.
Employees will receive half of the
across-the-board GS percentage increase
in basic pay and the full locality pay
increase while on maintained pay. Upon
termination of maintained pay, the
employee’s basic pay will be adjusted
according to the CCS appraisal process.
If the employee’s basic pay exceeds the
maximum basic pay of his or her pay
band upon expiration of the 2-year
period, the employee’s pay will not be
reduced; the employee will be in the
overcompensated range of basic pay
category for CCS pay increase purposes,
see Figure 9.
Maintained pay shall cease to apply
to an employee who: (1) Has a break in
service of 1 workday or more; or (2) is
demoted for personal cause or at the
employee’s request. The employee’s
maintained rate of pay is basic pay for
purposes of locality pay (locality pay is
basic pay for purposes of retirement, life
insurance, premium pay, severance pay,
advances in pay, workers’
compensation, and lump-sum payments
for annual leave but not for computing
promotion increases). Employees
promoted while on maintained pay may
have their basic pay (excluding locality
pay) set up to 20 percent greater than
the maximum basic pay for their current
pay band or retain their ‘‘maintained
pay,’’ whichever is greater.
3. Promotion
The movement of an employee to a
higher pay band within the same career
track or to a different career track and
pay band in which the new pay band
has a higher maximum basic salary rate
than the pay band from which the
employee is leaving.
4. Reassignment
The movement of an employee from
one position to another position within
the same pay band in the same career
track or to a position in another career
track and pay band in which the new
pay band has the same maximum basic
salary rate as the pay band from which
the employee is leaving.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
5. Change to Lower Pay Band
The movement of an employee to a
lower pay band within the same career
track or to a different career track and
pay band in which the new pay band
has a lower maximum basic salary range
than the pay band from which the
employee is leaving.
6. Pay Adjustment
Any increase or decrease in an
employee’s rate of basic pay where there
is no change in the employee’s position.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Termination of maintained pay is also a
pay adjustment.
7. Detail
The temporary assignment of an
employee to a different demonstration
project position for a specified period
when the employee is expected to
return to his or her regular duties at the
end of the assignment. (An employee
who is on detail is considered for pay
and strength purposes to be
permanently occupying his or her
regular position.)
8. Highest Previous Rate
ONR will establish maximum payable
rate rules that parallel the rules in 5 CFR
531.202 and 531.203(c) and (d).
9. Approving Manager
Managers at the directorate, division
head, division superintendent, or
directorate-level staff offices who have
budget allocation/execution; position
management; position classification;
recruitment; and staffing authorities for
their organization.
H. Pay Setting Determinations Outside
the CCS
1. External New Hires
a. This includes reinstatements. Initial
basic pay for new appointees into the
demonstration project may be set at any
point within the basic pay range for the
career track, occupation, and pay band
to which appointed that is consistent
with the special qualifications of the
individual and the unique requirements
of the position. These special
qualifications may be consideration of
education, training, experience, scarcity
of qualified applicants, labor market
considerations, programmatic urgency,
or any combination thereof which is
pertinent to the position to which
appointed. Highest previous rate may be
used to set the pay of new appointees
into the demonstration project. (The
approving manager authorizes the basic
pay.)
b. Transfers from within DoD and
other Federal agencies will have their
pay set using pay setting policy for
internal actions based on the type of pay
action.
c. A recruitment or relocation bonus
may be paid using the same provisions
available for GS employees under 5
U.S.C. 5753. Employees placed through
the DoD Priority Placement Program
(PPP), the DON Reemployment Priority
List (RPL), or the Federal Interagency
Career Transition Assistance Plan are
entitled to the last earned rate if they
have been separated.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30203
2. Internal Actions
These actions cover employees within
the demonstration project, including
demonstration project employees who
apply and are selected for a position
within the project.
a. Promotion.
When an employee is promoted, the
basic pay after promotion may be up to
20 percent greater than the employee’s
current basic pay. However, if the
minimum rate of the new pay band is
more than 20 percent greater than the
employee’s current basic pay, then the
minimum rate of the new pay band is
the new basic pay. The employee’s basic
pay may not exceed the basic pay range
of the new pay band. Highest previous
rate may be applied, if appropriate. (The
approving manager authorizes the basic
pay.) Note: Most target pay band
promotions will be accomplished
through the CCS appraisal and pay
adjustment process (see section IV.C.8).
b. Pay Adjustment (Voluntary Change
to Lower Pay) or Change to Lower Pay
Band (except RIF).
When an employee accepts a
voluntary change to lower pay or lower
pay band, basic pay may be set at any
point within the pay band to which
appointed, except that the new basic
pay will not exceed the employee’s
current basic pay or the maximum basic
pay of the pay band to which assigned,
whichever is lower. Highest previous
rate may be applied, if appropriate. (The
approving manager authorizes the basic
pay.)
(1) Examples of Voluntary Change to
a Lower Pay Band. An employee in an
Administrative Specialist and
Professional Career Track, Pay Band III,
position may decide he or she would
prefer a Pay Band II position in the
Administrative Support Career Track
because it offers a different work
schedule or duty station. An employee
in Level IV of the Administrative
Specialist and Professional Career Track
who has a family member with a serious
medical problem and wants to be
relieved of supervisory responsibilities
may request a change to Pay Band III.
(2) Example of Pay Adjustment
(Voluntary Change to Lower Pay) or
change to a Lower Pay Band. An
employee may accept a change to lower
pay or to a lower pay band through a
settlement agreement. A Research
Physicist, who is in Level III and is
being paid near the top of Level III, is
rated unacceptable in the critical
element Research and Development
(R&D) Business Management. In
settlement of a proposal to remove this
employee for unacceptable performance,
an agreement is reached which reduces
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30204
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
the employee’s pay to a rate near the
beginning of Level III.
c. Pay Adjustment (Involuntary
Change to Lower Pay) or Change to
Lower Pay Band Due to Adverse or
Performance-based Action.
When an employee is changed to a
lower pay band, or receives a change to
lower pay due to an adverse or
performance-based action, the
employee’s basic pay will be reduced by
at least 6 percent, but will be set at a rate
within the rate range for the pay band
to which assigned. (The approving
manager authorizes the basic pay.) Such
employees will be afforded appeal rights
as provided by 5 U.S.C. 4303 or 7512,
as appropriate.
d. Involuntary Change to Lower Pay
Band or Reassignment to a Career Track
with a Lower Salary Range, Other than
Adverse or Performance-based.
If the change is not a result of an
adverse or performance-based action,
the basic pay will be preserved to the
extent possible within the basic pay
range of the new pay band. If the pay
cannot be set within the rate range of
the new pay band, it will be set at the
maximum rate of the new pay band and
the employee’s pay will be reduced. If
the change is a result of a position
reclassification resulting in the
employee being assigned to a lower pay
band or reassigned to a different career
track with a lower maximum basic
salary range, the employee is entitled to
maintained pay if the employee’s
current salary exceeds the maximum
rate for the new band.
e. RIF Action (including employees
who are offered and accept a vacancy at
a lower pay band or in a different career
track).
The employee is entitled to
maintained pay, if the employee’s
current salary exceeds the maximum
rate for the new band.
f. Upward Mobility or Other Formal
Training Program Selection.
The employee is entitled to
maintained pay, if the employee’s
current salary exceeds the maximum
rate for the new band.
g. Return to Limited or Light Duty
from a Disability as a Result of
Occupational Injury to a Position in a
Lower Pay Band or to a Career Track
with Lower Basic Pay Potential than
Held Prior to the Injury.
The employee is entitled indefinitely
to the basic pay held prior to the injury
and will receive full general and locality
pay increases. If upon reemployment, an
employee was not given the higher basic
pay (basic pay received at the time of
the injury), any retirement annuity or
severance pay computation would be
based on his or her lower basic pay
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
(salary based on placement in a lower
pay band). Even though the Department
of Labor (DOL) would make up the
difference between the lower basic pay
and the higher basic pay earned at the
time of injury, the DOL portion is not
considered in the retirement or
severance pay computation.
h. Restoration to Duty.
Employees returning from the
uniformed services following an
absence of more than 30 days must be
restored as soon as possible after making
application, but not later than 30 days
after receipt of application. If the
employee’s uniformed service was for
less than 91 days the employee will be
placed in the position that he or she
would have attained if continuously
employed. If not qualified for this
position, employee will be placed in the
position he or she left. For service of 91
days or more, the employee may also be
placed in a position of like seniority,
status, and pay. In the case of an
employee with a disability incurred in
or aggravated during uniformed service,
and after reasonable efforts to
accommodate the disability is entitled
to be placed in another position for
which qualified that will provide the
employee with the same seniority,
status, and pay, or the nearest
approximation.
i. Reassignment.
The basic pay normally remains the
same. Highest previous rate may be
applied, if appropriate. (The approving
manager authorizes the basic pay).
j. Student Educational Employment
Program.
The Student Educational Employment
Program consists of two components:
The Student Temporary Employment
Program and the Student Career
Experience Program. Initial basic pay for
students in either of these programs may
be set at any point within the basic pay
range for the career track, occupation,
and pay band to which appointed. Basic
pay may be increased upon return to
duty (RTD) or conversion to temporary
appointment, in consideration of the
student’s additional education and
experience at the time of the action.
Students who work under a parallel
work study program may have their
basic pay increased in consideration of
additional education and/or experience.
Basic pay for students may be increased
based on their CCS appraisal. (The
approving manager authorizes the basic
pay).
k. Hazard Pay or Pay for Duty
Involving Physical Hardship.
Employees under the demonstration
project will be paid hazardous duty pay
under the provisions of 5 CFR part 550,
subpart I.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
I. Priority Placement Program (PPP)
Current PPP procedures apply to new
hires and internal actions.
J. Expanded Temporary Promotion
Current regulations require that
temporary promotions for more than
120 days to a higher level position than
previously held must be made
competitively. Under the demonstration
project, ONR would be able to effect
temporary promotions of not more than
one year within a 24-month period
without competition to positions within
the demonstration project.
K. Voluntary Emeritus Program
The ONR Voluntary Emeritus Program
is similar to the Voluntary Emeritus
Program presented in the AMRDEC
demonstration project FRN, section
III.D.5., page 34890. Under the ONR
program, the CNR will have the
authority to offer retired or separated
individuals voluntary assignments at
ONR. This authority will include
individuals who have retired or
separated from Federal service.
Voluntary Emeritus Program
assignments are not considered
‘‘employment’’ by the Federal
government (except for purposes of
injury compensation). Thus, such
assignments do not affect an employee’s
entitlement to buyouts or severance
payments based on an earlier separation
from Federal service. The Voluntary
Emeritus Program will ensure continued
quality research while reducing the
overall salary line by allowing higher
paid individuals to accept retirement
incentives with the opportunity to
retain a presence in the scientific
community. The program will be of
most benefit during manpower
reductions as senior employees could
accept retirement and return to provide
valuable on-the-job training or
mentoring to less experienced
employees. Voluntary service will not
be used to replace any employee or
interfere with career opportunities of
employees.
To be accepted into the emeritus
program, a volunteer must be
recommended by ONR managers to the
CNR or designee. Everyone who applies
is not entitled to a voluntary
assignment. The approving official must
clearly document the decision process
for each applicant (whether accepted or
rejected) and retain the documentation
throughout the assignment.
Documentation of rejections will be
maintained for two years.
To ensure success and encourage
participation, the volunteer’s Federal
retirement pay (whether military or
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
30205
(6) a one-page Statement of Duties and
Experience;
(7) a provision that states no
additional time will be added to a
volunteer’s service credit for such
purposes as retirement, severance pay,
and leave as a result of being a member
of the Voluntary Emeritus Program;
(8) a provision allowing either party
to void the agreement with 10 working
days written notice; and
(9) the level of security access
required (any security clearance
required by the assignment will be
managed by the ONR while the
volunteer is a member of the Voluntary
Emeritus Program).
1. Career Tracks and Pay Bands
Within the IPS, occupations with
similar characteristics will be grouped
together into four career tracks. Each
career track consists of a number of pay
bands, representing the phases of career
progression that are typical for the
respective career track. The pay bands
within each career track are shown in
Figure 3, along with their GS
equivalents. The equivalents are based
on the levels of responsibility as defined
in 5 U.S.C. 5104 and not on current
basic pay schedules. Appendix C
provides definitions for each of the
career tracks and the pay bands within
them. The career tracks and pay bands
were developed based upon
administrative, organizational, and
position management considerations at
ONR. They are designed to enhance pay
equity and enable a more seamless
career progression to the target pay band
for an individual position or category of
positions. This combination of career
tracks and pay bands allows for
competitive recruitment of quality
candidates at differing rates of
compensation within the appropriate
career track, occupation, and pay band.
It will also facilitate movement and
placement based upon contribution, in
conjunction with the CCS described in
paragraph IV.C. Other benefits of this
arrangement include a dual career track
for S&E employees and greater
competitiveness with academia and
private industry for recruitment.
Appendix D identifies the occupational
series currently within each of the three
career tracks.
a. Target Pay Band.
Each position will have a designated
target pay band under the
demonstration project. This target pay
band will be identified as the pay band
to which an incumbent may be
advanced without further competition
within a career track. These target pay
bands will be based upon present full
performance levels. Target pay bands
may vary based upon occupation or
career track. Employees’ basic pay will
be capped at the target pay band until
other appropriate conditions (e.g.,
competition, position management
approval, increase in or acquisition of
higher level duties, and approval of an
accretion of duties promotion) have
been met, and the employee has been
promoted into the next higher level.
b. Occupational Series and Position
Titling.
Presently, ONR positions are
identified by occupational groups and
series of classes in accordance with
OPM position classification standards.
Under the demonstration project, ONR
will continue to use occupational series
designators consistent with those
currently authorized by OPM to identify
positions. This will facilitate related
personnel management requirements,
such as movement into and out of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
IV. Sustainment
A. Position Classification
The position classification changes
are intended to streamline and simplify
the process of identifying and
categorizing the work done at ONR.
ONR will establish an Integrated Pay
Schedule (IPS) for all demonstration
project positions in covered
occupations. The IPS will replace the
current GS and extend the pay schedule
equivalent to the basic pay range of the
Government’s Senior Level Pay System
to accommodate positions classified
above the GS–15 level under a proposed
new STRL demonstration project
initiative being developed by DoD.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.005
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
civilian) will not be affected while
serving in a voluntary capacity. Retired
or separated Federal employees may
accept an emeritus position without a
break or mandatory waiting period.
Volunteers will not be permitted to
monitor contracts on behalf of the
government or to participate on any
contracts or solicitations where a
conflict of interest exists. The same
rules that currently apply to source
selection members will apply to
volunteers.
An agreement will be established
between the volunteer, the CNR or
designee, and the HRO Director. The
agreement will be reviewed by the local
Legal Office for ethics determinations
under the Joint Ethics Regulation. The
agreement must be finalized before the
assumption of duties and shall include:
(1) A statement that the voluntary
assignment does not constitute an
appointment in the civil service, is
without compensation, and any and all
claims against the Government (because
of the voluntary assignment) are waived
by the volunteer;
(2) a statement that the volunteer will
be considered a Federal employee for
the purpose of injury compensation;
(3) volunteer’s work schedule;
(4) length of agreement (defined by
length of project or time defined by
weeks, months, or years);
(5) support provided by the ONR
(travel, administrative, office space,
supplies);
30206
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Each element has generic descriptors for
every pay band. These descriptors
explain the type of work, degree of
responsibility, and scope of
contributions that need to be ultimately
accomplished to reach the highest basic
pay potential within each pay band.
(See Appendix E.) To classify a position,
a manager would select the pay band
which is most indicative overall of the
type of duties to be performed and the
contributions needed. For example: A
supervisor needs a secretarial position
for a branch. In reading the elements
and descriptors for the Administrative
Support Career Track, the supervisor
determines that the Level II descriptors
illustrate the type of work and
contributions needed. Therefore, the
position would be classified as a
Secretary, Level II.
d. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Demonstration project positions will
be covered under the FLSA and 5 CFR
part 551. Determination of their status
(exempt or nonexempt) will be made
based on the criteria contained in 5 CFR
part 551. The status of each new
position under the demonstration
project will be determined using
computer assisted analysis as part of an
automated process for preparing the RD.
Those positions for which the computer
is unable to make the final FLSA
determination will be ‘‘flagged’’ for
referral to a human resources specialist
for determination.
(1) Guidelines for FLSA
Determinations.
i. Supervisory Information: Provided
through an automated system in a
checklist format; results of this checklist
have an impact on FLSA determination.
ii. FLSA Information: Provided
through an automated system in a
checklist format; results of this checklist
in conjunction with the supervisory
information provide a basis for the
FLSA determination.
iii. If required, the section entitled
‘‘Purpose of Position’’ will be used to
assist in FLSA determination.
iv. RD’s requiring additional review
before being finalized will be forwarded
to a human resources specialist to
review the FLSA determination.
(2) Nonsupervisory and Leader
Positions.
Figure 4 shows the exempt or
nonexempt status applicable to
nonsupervisory and leader positions in
the indicated career track and pay band.
In those cases where ‘‘Review’’ is
indicated, the FLSA status must be
determined based on the specific duties
and responsibilities of the subject
position.
(3) Supervisory Positions.
FLSA determination for supervisory
positions must be made based on the
duties and responsibilities of the
particular position involved. As a rule,
if a position requires supervision of
employees who are exempt under FLSA,
the supervisory position is likely to be
exempt also.
the current classification system. The
RD will be prepared by managers using
a menu-driven, automated system. The
automated system will enable managers
to classify and establish many positions
without intervention by a human
resources specialist. The abbreviated RD
will combine the position information,
staffing requirements, and contribution
expectations into a 1- or 2-page
document.
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
2. Requirements Document (RD)
An RD will replace the Optional Form
8 and position description used under
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Classification authority will be
delegated to managers as a means of
increasing managerial effectiveness and
expediting the classification function.
This will be accomplished as follows:
a. Delegated Authority.
i. The CNR will delegate classification
authority to the Human Resources
Office (HRO) Director. The HRO
Director may further delegate authority
to Department Heads and Directors of
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.006
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
demonstration project. Other
occupational series may be added or
deleted as needed to support the
demonstration project. Interdisciplinary
positions will be accommodated within
the system based upon the
qualifications of the individual hired.
Titling practices consistent with those
established by OPM classification
standards will be used to determine the
official title. Such practice will facilitate
other personnel management
requirements, such as the following:
Movement into and out of the
demonstration project, reduction in
force, external reporting requirements,
and recruitment. CCS pay band
descriptors and Requirements
Document (RD) (see paragraph IV.A.2)
information will be used for specific
career track, pay band, and titling
determinations.
c. Classification Standards.
Under the proposed demonstration
project, the number of classification
standards would be reduced to three
(see Figure 3). Each standard would
align with one of the three career tracks
and would cover all positions within
that career track. Each career track has
two or three elements that are
considered in both classifying a position
and in judging an individual’s
contributions for pay setting purposes.
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
the immediate organization of the
position being classified.
ii. The classification approval must be
at least one level above the first-level
supervisor of the position.
iii. First-line supervisors at any level
will provide classification
recommendations.
iv. HRO support will be available for
guidance and recommendations
concerning the classification process.
(Any dispute over the proper
classification between a manager and
the HRO will be resolved by the CNR or
designee.
b. Position Classification
Accountability.
Those to whom authority is delegated
are accountable to the CNR. The CNR is
accountable to the DON. Those with
delegated authority are expected to
comply with demonstration project
guidelines on classification and position
management, observe the principle of
equal pay for equal work, and ensure
that RD’s are current. First-line
supervisors will develop positions using
the automated system. All positions
must be approved through the proper
chain of command.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
B. Integrated Pay Schedule
Under the demonstration project, an
IPS will be established which will cover
all demonstration project positions at
ONR. This IPS, which does not include
locality pay, will initially extend from
the basic pay for GS–1, step 1 to the
basic pay for GS–15, step 10. The
adjusted basic pay cap, which does
include locality pay, is Executive Level
IV, currently $155,500. The salary range
for the S&E pay band V pay band is
expected to be established under the
new STRL demonstration project
initiative being developed for positions
classified above GS–15.
1. Annual Pay Action
ONR will eliminate separate pay
actions for within-grade increases,
general and locality pay increases,
performance awards, quality step
increases, and most career promotions
and replace them with a single annual
pay action (including either permanent
or bonus pay or both) linked to the CCS.
This will eliminate the paperwork and
processing associated with multiple pay
actions which average three per
employee per year.
2. Overtime Pay
Overtime will be paid in accordance
with 5 CFR part 550, subpart A. All
nonexempt employees will be paid
overtime based upon their ‘‘hourly
regular rate of pay,’’ as defined in
existing regulation (5 CFR part 551).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
3. Classification Appeals
An employee may appeal the
occupational series, title, career track, or
pay band of his or her position at any
time. An employee must formally raise
the area of concern to supervisors in the
immediate chain of command, either
verbally or in writing. If an employee is
not satisfied with the supervisory
response, he or she may then appeal to
the DoD appellate level. If an employee
is not satisfied with the DoD response,
he or she may then appeal to the OPM
only after DoD has rendered a decision
under the provisions of this
demonstration project. Since OPM does
not accept classification appeals on
positions which exceed the equivalent
of a GS–15 level, appeal decisions
involving Pay Band V for science and
engineering positions classified about
the GS–15 level will be rendered by
DoD and will be final. Appellate
decisions from OPM are final and
binding on all administrative, certifying,
payroll, disbursing, and accounting
officials of the Government. Time
periods for case processing under 5 CFR
subpart F, sections 511.603, 511.604,
and 511.605 apply.
An employee may not appeal the
accuracy of the RD, the demonstration
project classification criteria, or the paysetting criteria; the propriety of a basic
pay schedule; the assignment of
occupational series to the occupational
family; or matters grievable under an
administrative or negotiated grievance
procedure, or an alternative dispute
resolution procedure.
The evaluation of classification
appeals under this demonstration
project is based upon the demonstration
project classification criteria. Case files
will be forwarded for adjudication
through the HRO and will include
copies of appropriate demonstration
project criteria.
4. Above GS–15 Positions
The pay banding plan for the
Scientific and Engineering occupational
family includes a pay band V to provide
the ability to accommodate positions
with duties and responsibilities that
exceed the General Schedule GS–15
classification criteria. This pay band is
based on the Above GS–15 Position
concept found in other STRL personnel
management demonstration projects
that was created to solve a critical
classification problem. The STRLs have
positions warranting classification
above GS–15 because of their technical
expertise requirements including
inherent supervisory and managerial
responsibilities. However, these
positions are not considered to be
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30207
appropriately classified as Scientific
and Professional Positions (STs) because
of the degree of supervision and level of
managerial responsibilities. Neither are
these positions appropriately classified
as Senior Executive Service (SES)
positions because of their requirement
for advanced specialized scientific or
engineering expertise and because the
positions are not at the level of general
managerial authority and impact
required for an SES position.
The original Above GS–15 Position
concept was to be tested for a five-year
period. The number of trial positions
was set at 40 with periodic reviews to
determine appropriate position
requirements. The Above GS–15
Position concept is currently being
evaluated by DoD management for its
effectiveness; continued applicability to
the current STRL scientific, engineering,
and technology workforce needs; and
appropriate allocation of billets based
on mission requirements. The degree to
which ONR plans to participate in this
concept and develop classification,
compensation, and performance
management policy, guidance, and
implementation processes will be based
on the final outcome of the DoD
evaluation.
5. Distinguished Contributions
Allowance (DCA)
The DCA is a temporary monetary
allowance up to 25 percent of basic pay
(which, when added to an employee’s
rate of basic pay, may not exceed the
rate of basic pay for Executive Level IV)
paid on either a bi-weekly basis
(concurrent with normal pay days) or as
a lump sum following completion of a
designated contribution period(s), or
combination of these, at the discretion
of ONR. It is not basic pay for any
purpose, i.e., retirement, life insurance,
severance pay, promotion, or any other
payment or benefit calculated as a
percentage of basic pay. The DCA will
be available to certain employees at the
top of their target pay bands, whose
present contributions are worthy of
scores found at a higher pay band,
whose level of contribution is expected
to continue at the higher pay band for
at least 1 year, and current market
conditions require additional
compensation.
Assignment of the DCA rather than a
change to a higher pay band will
generally be appropriate for such
employees under the following
circumstances: Employees have reached
the top of their target pay bands and (1)
when it is not certain that the higher
level contributions will continue
indefinitely (e.g., a special project
expected to be of one- up to five-year
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30208
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
duration); (2) when no further
promotion or compensation
opportunities are available; (3) in either
situation (1) or (2), current market
conditions compensate similar
contributions at a greater rate in like
positions in private industry and
academia; and (4) there is a history of
significant recruitment and retention
difficulties associated with such
positions.
a. Eligibility.
(1) Employees in Levels III and IV of
the S&E Professional Career Track and
those in Levels III, IV, and V of the
Administrative Specialist and
Professional Career Track are eligible for
the DCA if they have reached the top
CCS score for their target pay band with
recommendations for a higher Overall
Contribution Score (OCS) for their
contributions; they have reached the
maximum rate of basic pay available for
their target pay band; there are
externally imposed limits to higher pay
bands or the higher level contributions
are not expected to last indefinitely; and
market conditions require greater
compensation for these contributions.
(2) Employees may receive a DCA for
up to three years. The DCA
authorization will be reviewed and
reauthorized as necessary, but at least
annually at the time of the CCS
appraisal through nomination by the
pay pool manager and approval by the
CNR. Employees in the S&E Professional
Career Track may receive an extension
of up to two additional years (for a total
of five years). The DCA extension
authorization will be reviewed and
reauthorized as necessary, but at least
on an annual basis at the time of the
CCS appraisal through nomination by
the pay pool manager and approval by
the CNR.
(3) Monetary payment may be up to
25 percent of basic pay.
(4) Nominees would be required to
sign a memorandum of understanding
or a statement indicating they
understand that the DCA is a temporary
allowance; it is not a part of basic pay
for any purpose; it would be subject to
review at any time, but at least on an
annual basis; and the reduction or
termination of the DCA is not
appealable or grievable.
b. Nomination.
In connection with the annual CCS
appraisal process, pay pool managers
may nominate eligible employees who
meet the criteria for the DCA. Packages
containing the recommended amount
and method of payment of the DCA and
a justification for the allowance will be
forwarded through the supervisory
chain to the CNR. Details regarding this
process will be addressed in standard
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
operating procedures. These details will
include time frames for nomination and
consideration, payout scheme,
justification content and format, budget
authority, guidelines for selecting
employees for the allowance and for
determining the appropriate amount,
and documentation required by the
employee acknowledging he or she
understands the criteria and temporary
nature of the DCA.
c. Reduction or Termination of a DCA.
(1) A DCA may be reduced or
terminated at any time the ONR deems
appropriate (e.g., when the special
project upon which the DCA was based
ends; if performance or contributions
decrease significantly; or if labor market
conditions change, etc.). The reduction
or termination of a DCA is not
appealable or grievable.
(2) If an employee voluntarily
separates from ONR before the
expiration of the DCA, an employee may
be denied DCA payment. Authority to
establish conditions and/or penalties
will be spelled out in the written
authorization of an individual’s DCA.
d. Lump-Sum DCA Payments.
(1) When ONR chooses to pay part or
all of an employee’s DCA as a lump sum
payable at the end of a designated
period, the employee will accrue
entitlement to a growing lump-sum
balance each pay period. The percentage
rate established for the lump-sum DCA
will be multiplied by the employee’s
biweekly amount of basic pay to
determine the lump sum accrual for any
pay period. This lump-sum percentage
rate is included in applying the 25
percent limitation.
(2) If an employee covered under a
lump-sum DCA authorization separates,
or the DCA is terminated (see paragraph
c), before the end of that designated
period, the employee may be entitled to
payment of the accrued and unpaid
balance under the conditions
established by ONR. ONR may establish
conditions governing lump-sum
payments (including penalties in cases
such as voluntary separation or
separation for personal cause) in general
plan policies or in the individual
employee’s DCA authorization.
e. DCA Budget Allocation.
The CNR may establish a total DCA
budget allocation that is never greater
than 10 percent of the basic salaries of
the employees currently at the cap in
the S&E Professional Career Track, Pay
Bands III and IV, and the Administrative
Specialist and Professional Career
Track, Pay Bands III, IV, and V.
f. Concurrent Monetary Payments.
Employees eligible for a DCA may be
authorized to receive a DCA and a
retention allowance at the same time, up
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
to a combined total of 25 percent of
basic pay. A merit increase which raises
an employee’s pay to the top rate for his
or her target pay band (thus making the
employee eligible for the DCA) may be
granted concurrent with the DCA.
Receipt of the DCA does not preclude an
employee from being granted any award
(including a contribution award) for
which he or she is otherwise eligible.
C. Contribution-Based Compensation
System (CCS)
1. General
The purpose of the CCS is to provide
an effective means for evaluating and
compensating the ONR workforce. It
provides management, at the lowest
practical level, the authority, control,
and flexibility needed to develop a
highly competent, motivated, and
productive workforce. CCS will promote
increased fairness and consistency in
the appraisal process, facilitate natural
career progression for employees, and
provide an understandable basis for
career progression by linking
contribution to basic pay
determinations.
CCS combines performance appraisal
and job classification into one annual
process. At the end of each CCS
appraisal period, basic pay adjustment
decisions are made based on each
employee’s actual contribution to the
organization’s mission during the
period. A separate function of the
process includes comparison of
performance in critical elements to
acceptable standards to identify
unacceptable performance that may
warrant corrective action in accordance
with 5 CFR part 432. Supervisory
officials determine scores to reflect each
employee’s contribution, considering
both how well and at what level the
employee is performing. Often the two
considerations are inseparable. For
example, an employee whose written
documents need to be returned for
rework more often than those of his or
her peers also likely requires a closer
level of oversight, an important factor
when considering level of pay.
The performance planning and rating
portions of the demonstration project’s
appraisal process constitute a
performance appraisal program which
complies with 5 CFR part 430 and the
DoD Performance Management System,
except where waivers have been
approved. Performance-related actions
initiated prior to implementation of the
demonstration project (under DON
performance management regulations)
shall continue to be processed in
accordance with the provisions of the
appropriate system.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
30209
each career track. Within specific
parameters, elements may be weighted
or even determined to be not applicable
for certain categories of positions. All
elements applicable to the position are
critical as defined by 5 CFR part 430.
each pay band for each discriminator)
define the expected level of contribution
at the top of the related pay band for
that element.
Scores currently range between 0 and
92; specific relationships between
scores and pay bands are different for
each career track. (See Figure 6.) Basic
pay adjustments are based on a
comparison of the employee’s level of
contribution to the normal pay range for
that contribution and the employee’s
present rate of basic pay.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.007
in detail in Appendix E have been
initially identified for evaluating the
contributions of ONR personnel covered
by this initiative. They are designed to
capture the highest level of the primary
content of the jobs in each pay band of
For each element, ‘‘Discriminators’’
and ‘‘Descriptors’’ are provided to assist
in distinguishing low to high
contributions. The discriminators (two
to four for each element) break down
aspects of work to be measured within
the element. The descriptors (one for
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
2. CCS Process
CCS measures employee contributions
by breaking down the jobs in each
career track using a common set of
‘‘elements.’’ The elements for each career
track shown in Figure 5 and described
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Supervisors and pay pool panels
determine an employee’s contribution
level for each element considering the
discriminators as appropriate to the
position. A contribution score, available
to that level, is assigned accordingly.
For example, a scientist whose
contribution in the Technical Problem
Solving element for S&E Professionals is
determined to be at Level II may be
assigned a score of 18 to 47. Eighteen
reflects the lowest level of
responsibility, exercise of independent
judgment, and scope of contribution;
and 47 reflects the highest. For Level III
contributions, a value of 44 to 66 may
be assigned. Each higher pay band
equates to a higher range of values with
the total points available to S&E
Professionals to be determined based on
the salary range for pay band V under
the proposed DoD above GS–15 position
initiative. Each element is judged
separately and level of work may vary
for different elements. The scores for
each element are then averaged to
determine the Overall Contribution
Score (OCS).
The CCS process will be carried out
within pay pools made up of combined
ONR organizations. The organizations in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
each pay pool will be combined based
on criteria such as similarity of work
and chain of command. To facilitate
equity and consistency, element weights
and applicability and CCS score
adjustments are determined by a pay
pool panel, rather than by individual
supervisors. Basic pay adjustments,
contribution awards, and DCA’s may be
recommended by the pay pool panel or
by individual supervisors. Pay pool
panels will consist of Department Heads
and Directors, or other individuals who
are familiar with the organization’s
work and the contributions of its
employees. The Executive Director or
designee will function as pay pool
manager, with final authority to decide
weights, scores, basic pay adjustments,
and awards.
3. Pay Pool Annual Planning
Prior to the beginning of each annual
appraisal period, the pay pool manager
and panel will review pay pool-wide
expectations in the areas described
below.
a. Element Weights and Applicability.
As written, all elements are weighted
equally. If pay pool panels and
managers decide that some elements are
more important than others or that some
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
do not apply at all to the effective
accomplishment of the organization’s
mission, they may establish element
weights including a weight of zero
which renders the element not
applicable. Element weights are not
intended for application to individual
employees. Instead, they may be
established only for subcategories of
positions, not to exceed a maximum of
five subcategories in each career track.
Subcategories for S&E Professionals
might be: Supervisor, Program Manager,
and Support S&E. Subcategories should
include a minimum of five positions,
when possible. Weights must be
consistent within the subcategory.
b. Supplemental Criteria.
The CCS level descriptors are
designed to be general so that they may
be applied to all employees in the career
track. Supervisors and pay pool panels
may establish supplemental criteria to
further inform employees of expected
contributions. This may include (but is
not limited to) examples of
contributions which reflect work at each
level for each element, taskings,
objectives, and/or standards.
4. Annual CCS Appraisal Process (See
Figure 7)
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.008
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30210
The ONR appraisal period will
normally be one year, with a minimum
appraisal period of 90 days. At the
beginning of the appraisal period, or
upon an employee’s arrival at ONR or
into a new position, the following
information will be communicated to
employees so that they are informed of
the basis on which their performance
and contributions will be assessed:
Their career track and pay band;
applicable elements, descriptors, and
discriminators; element weights; any
established supplemental criteria; OCS’s
which correspond to each employee’s
NPR (see section IV.C.6); and basic
acceptable performance standards. The
CCS Summary (Appendix E) will be
used to facilitate and document this
communication. All employees will be
provided this information; however,
employees in some situations may not
receive CCS scores. These situations are
described in section IV.C.5, Exceptions.
The communication of information
described by this paragraph constitutes
performance planning as required by 5
CFR 430.206(b).
Supervisor and employee discussion
of organizational objectives, specific
work assignments, and individual
performance expectations (as needed),
should be conducted on an ongoing
basis. Either the supervisor or the
employee may request a formal review
during the appraisal period; otherwise,
a documented review is required only at
the end of the appraisal period.
At the end of the appraisal period,
employees will provide input describing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
their contributions by preparing a
Yearly Accomplishment Report (YAR).
Pay pool managers may exempt groups
of positions from the requirement to
submit YARs; in cases where YARs are
not required, employees may submit
them at their own discretion. Standard
operating procedures will provide
guidance for pay pools and employees
on the content and format of YARs, and
on other types of information about
employee contributions which should
be developed and considered by
supervisors. This will include
procedures for capturing contribution
information regarding employees who
serve on details, who change positions
during the appraisal period, who are
new to ONR, and other such
circumstances.
Supervisors will review the
employee’s YAR and other available
information about the employee’s
contributions during the appraisal
period and determine an initial CCS
score for each element considering the
discriminators as appropriate to the
position. In addition, supervisors will
determine whether the employee’s
performance was acceptable or
unacceptable in each element when
compared against the basic acceptable
performance standards. The rating of the
elements (all that are applicable are
designated critical as defined by 5 CFR
part 430) will serve as the basis for
assignment of a summary level of
Acceptable or Unacceptable. If any
element is rated unacceptable, the
summary level will be Unacceptable;
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30211
otherwise the summary level will be
Acceptable. Unacceptable ratings must
be reviewed and approved by a higher
level than the first-level supervisor.
If an employee changes positions
during the last 90 days of the appraisal
period, the losing supervisor will
conduct a performance rating (i.e., rate
each element Acceptable or
Unacceptable and determine the
summary level) at the time the
employee moves to the new position.
This will serve as the employee’s rating
of record. For employees who report to
ONR during the last 90 days of the
appraisal period, any close-out rating of
Acceptable (or its equivalent) or better
from another Government agency will
serve as the employee’s rating of record
(the employee will be rated Acceptable).
The determination of CCS scores and
application of related pay adjustments
for such employees is set forth in
section IV.C.5, ‘‘Exceptions.’’
The pay pool panel will meet to
compare scores, make appropriate
adjustments, and determine the final
OCS for each employee. Final approval
of CCS scores and element and
summary ratings will rest with the pay
pool manager (unless higher level
approval is requested or deemed
necessary). Supervisors will
communicate the element scores,
ratings, summary level, and OCS to each
employee, and discuss the results and
plans for continuing growth. Employees
rated Unacceptable will be provided
assistance to improve their performance
(see paragraph V.A).
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.009
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
30212
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
The CCS process will be facilitated by
an automated system, the Contributionbased Compensation System Data
System (CCSDS). During the appraisal
process, all scores and supervisory
comments will be entered into the
CCSDS. The CCSDS will provide
supervisors, pay pool panel members,
and pay pool managers with background
information (e.g., YARS, employees’
prior year scores and current basic pay)
and spreadsheets to assist them in
comparing contributions and
determining scores. Records of
employee appraisals will be maintained
in the CCSDS, and the system will be
able to produce a hard copy document
for each employee which reflects his or
her final approved score.
5. Exceptions
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
All employees who have worked 90
days or more by the end of the appraisal
period will receive a performance rating
of record. However, in certain situations
ONR does not consider the actual
determination of CCS scores to be
necessary. In other situations, it may not
be feasible to determine a meaningful
CCS score. Therefore, the determination
of CCS scores will not be required for
the following types of employees: (a)
Employees on intermittent work
schedules; (b) those on temporary
appointments of one year or less; (c)
those who work less than six months in
an appraisal period (e.g., on extended
absence due to illness); (d) those on
long-term training for all or much of the
appraisal period; (e) employees who
have reported to ONR or to a new
position during the 90 days prior to the
end of the appraisal period; and (f)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Student Educational Employment
Program employees.
If supervisors believe that the nature
of such an employee’s contributions
provide a meaningful basis to determine
a CCS score, they may appraise
employees in the categories listed
above, provided that the employee has
worked at least 90 days in an ONR
position during the appraisal period.
Those employees mentioned above
who are not appraised under CCS will
not be eligible for merit increases or
contribution awards. (This will affect
the calculation of service credit for RIF
(see section V.C.)). All employees listed
above will be given full general and
locality increases (as described in
sections IV.C.7.a, ‘‘General Increases,’’
and IV.C.7.c, ‘‘Locality Increases’’). All
employees are eligible for awards under
ONR’s Incentive Awards Program, such
as ‘‘On-the-Spot’’ and Special Act
Awards, as appropriate.
6. Normal Pay Range (NPR)—Basic Pay
Versus Contribution
The CCS assumes a relationship
between the assessed contribution of the
employee and a normal range of pay.
For all possible contribution scores
available to employees, the NPR spans
a basic pay range of 12 percent.
Employees who are compensated below
the NPR for their assessed score are
considered ‘‘undercompensated,’’ while
employees compensated above the NPR
are considered ‘‘overcompensated.’’
The lower boundary of the NPR is
initially established by fixing the basic
pay equivalent to GS–1, step 1 (without
locality pay), with a CCS score of zero.
The upper boundary is fixed at the basic
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
pay equivalent to GS–15, step 10
(without locality pay), with a CCS score
of 80. The distance between these upper
and lower boundaries for a given overall
contribution score is 12 percent of basic
pay for all available CCS scores. Using
these constraints, the interval between
scores is approximately 2.37 percent
through the entire range of pay. The
lines will be extended using the same
interval so that the upper boundary of
the normal range of basic pay
accommodates the basic pay needed for
the S&E Professional career track pay
band V. (The actual end point will vary
depending on any pay adjustment
factors, e.g., general increase.) The
formula used to derive the NPR may be
adjusted in future years of the
demonstration project. See Appendix F
for further details regarding the
formulation of the NPR.
Each year the boundaries for the NPR
plus the minimum and maximum rate of
basic pay for each pay band will be
adjusted by the amount of the acrossthe-board GS percentage increase
granted to the Federal workforce. At the
end of each annual appraisal period,
employees’ contribution scores will be
determined by the CCS process
described above, and then their overall
contribution scores and current rates of
basic pay will be plotted as a point on
a graph along with the NPR. The
position of the point relative to the NPR
gives a relative measure of the degree of
over- or undercompensation of the
employee, as shown in Figure 8. Points
which fall below the NPR indicate
undercompensation; points which fall
above the NPR indicate
overcompensation.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
30213
The CCSDS will calculate each
employee’s OCS and his or her standing
in relation to the NPR. The system will
provide a framework to assist pay pool
officials in selecting and implementing
a payout scheme. It will alert
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.011
standing relative to the NPR has been
determined, the pay pool manager, in
consultation with the pay pool panel or
other pay pool supervisory and staff
officials, will determine the appropriate
basic pay change and contribution
award, if appropriate, for each
employee. Standard operating
procedures will provide guidance,
including market salary reference data,
to assist pay pool managers in making
pay determinations. In most cases, the
pay pool manager will approve basic
pay changes and awards. In some cases,
however, approval of a higher level
official will be required. Figure 9
summarizes the eligibility criteria and
applicable limits for each pay category.
EN28MY10.010
Presently, employee pay is
established, adjusted, and/or augmented
in a variety of ways, including general
pay increases, locality pay increases,
special rate adjustments, within-grade
increases (WGI’s), quality step increases
(QSI’s), performance awards, and
promotions. Multiple pay changes in
any given year (averaging three per
employee) are costly to process and do
not consider comprehensively the
employee’s contributions to the
organization. Under the demonstration
project, ONR will distribute the budget
authority from the sources listed above
into four pay categories: (1) General
increase, (2) locality increase, (3) merit
increase, and (4) contribution awards.
From these pay categories, single annual
pay actions would be authorized based
primarily on employees’ contributions.
Competitive promotions will still be
processed under a separate pay action;
most career promotions will be
processed under the CCS.
In general, the goal of CCS is to pay
in a manner consistent with employees’
contributions or, in other words, migrate
employees’ basic pay closer to the NPR.
One result may be a wider distribution
of pay among employees for a given
level of duties.
After the CCS appraisal process has
been completed and the employees’
7. Compensation
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30214
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
management to certain formal limits in
granting pay increases; e.g., an
employee may not receive a permanent
increase above the maximum rate of
basic pay for his or her pay band until
a corresponding level change has been
effected. Once basic pay and award
decisions have been finalized and
approved, the CCSDS will prepare the
data file for processing the pay actions
and maintain a consolidated record of
CCS pay actions for all ONR
demonstration project employees.
a. General Increases.
General increase budget authority will
be available to pay pools as a straight
percentage of employee salaries, as
derived under 5 U.S.C. 5303 or similar
authority. Pay pool panels or managers
may reduce or deny general pay
increases for employees whose
contributions are in the
overcompensated category. (See Figure
9.) Such reduction or denial may not
place an employee in the
undercompensated category. An
employee receiving maintained pay
(except one receiving maintained pay
for an occupational injury who receives
a full general pay increase) will receive
half of the across-the-board GS
percentage increase in basic pay until
the employee’s basic pay is within the
basic pay range assigned for their
current position or for two years,
whichever is less. ONR employees on
pay retention at the time of
demonstration project implementation
or as a result of placement through the
DON RPL, DoD PPP or the Federal
Interagency Career Transition
Assistance Plan will receive half of the
across-the-board GS percentage increase
until the employee’s maintained pay is
exceeded by the maximum rate for the
employee’s pay band or the maintained
pay is ended due to a promotion.
General increase authority not expended
is available to either the merit increase
or contribution award pay categories or
both.
b. Merit Increases.
Merit increases will be calculated
after the determination of employees’
general increases. Merit increases may
be granted to employees whose
contribution places them in the
‘‘normal’’ or ‘‘undercompensated’’
categories. (See Figure 9.) In general, the
higher the range in which the employee
is contributing compared to his or her
basic pay, the higher the merit increase
should be. However, the following
limitations apply: A merit increase may
not place any employee’s basic pay (1)
in the ‘‘overcompensated’’ category (as
established by the NPR for the
upcoming year, which has been
adjusted by the amount of the new
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
general increase); (2) in excess of
established basic pay caps; (3) in excess
of the maximum rate of basic pay for the
individual’s pay band (unless the
employee is being concurrently
advanced to the higher pay band); or (4)
above any outside-imposed dollar limit.
Merit increases for employees in the
NPR will be limited to six percent of
basic pay, not to exceed the upper limit
of the NPR for the employee’s score. In
addition, merit increases for employees
in the undercompensated range may not
exceed six percent above the lower rail
of the NPR, or 20 percent of basic pay
without CNR or designee approval.
The size of ONR’s continuing pay
fund is based on appropriate factors,
including the following: (1) Historical
spending for within-grade increases,
quality step increases, and in-level
career promotions (with dynamic
adjustments to account for changes in
law or in staffing factors, e.g., average
starting salaries and the distribution of
employees among job categories and
band levels); (2) labor market conditions
and the need to recruit and retain a
skilled workforce to meet the business
needs of the organization; and (3) the
fiscal condition of the organization.
ONR will periodically review or will
review every two to three years its
continuing pay fund to determine if any
adjustments are necessary.
The amount of budget authority
available to each pay pool will be
determined annually by the CNR.
Factors to be considered by the CNR in
determining annual budget authority
may include market salaries, mission
priorities, and organizational growth.
Because statistical variations will occur
in year-to-year personnel growth, any
unexpended merit increase authorities
may be transferred to the Contribution
Awards category.
c. Locality Increases.
All employees will be entitled to the
locality pay increase authorized by law
and regulation for their official duty
station and/or position.
d. Contribution Awards.
Authority to pay contribution awards
(lump-sum payments recognizing
significant contributions) will be
initially available to pay pools as a
straight 1.5 percent of employees’ basic
pay (similar to the amount currently
available for performance awards). The
percentage rate may be adjusted in
future years of the demonstration
project. In addition, unexpended
general increase and merit increase
budget authorities may be used to
augment the award category.
Contribution awards may be granted to
those employees whose contributions
place them in the ‘‘normal’’ or
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
‘‘undercompensated’’ category and to
employees in the ‘‘overcompensated’’
category who are on maintained pay.
Standard operating procedures will
provide guidance to pay pool managers
in establishing and applying criteria to
determine significant contributions
which warrant awards. An award
exceeding $10,000 requires CNR
approval. (See Figure 9.) Pay pools may
also grant time-off as a contribution
award, in lieu of or in addition to cash.
8. Career Movement Based on CCS
Movement through the pay bands will
be determined by contribution and basic
pay at the time of the annual CCS
appraisal process.
The ONR demonstration project is an
integrated system that links level of
work to be accomplished (as defined by
a career track and pay band) with
individual achievement of that work (as
defined by an OCS) to establish the rate
of appropriate compensation (as defined
by the career track pay schedule) and to
determine progression through the
career track. This section addresses only
changes in level which relate directly to
the CCS determination.
When an employee’s OCS falls within
three scores of the top score available to
his or her current pay band, supervisors
should consider whether it is
appropriate to advance the employee to
the next higher level (refer to IV.A.1.a
for other criteria). If progression to the
next higher level is deemed warranted,
supporting documentation would be
included with the CCS appraisal and
forwarded through the appropriate
channels for approval. If advancement is
not considered appropriate at this time,
the employee would remain in his or
her current pay band. Future basic pay
raises would be capped by the top of the
employee’s current pay band unless the
employee progresses to the next higher
pay band through a CCS-related
promotion, an accretion of duties
promotion, or a competitive promotion.
a. Advancements in Level Which May
be Approved by the Pay Pool Manager.
Advancements to all levels except
Level V of the S&E Professional Career
Track may be approved by the pay pool
manager.
b. Advancements in Level Which
Must be Approved by the CNR.
Advancement to (1) levels outside
target pay bands or established position
management criteria; (2) Levels IV and
V of the S&E Professional Career Track;
and (3) Levels IV and V of the
Administrative Specialist and
Professional Career Track require
approval by the CNR or his or her
designee. Details regarding the process
for nomination and consideration,
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
format, selection criteria, and other
aspects of this process will be addressed
in the standard operating procedures.
c. Advancement to Level V of the
Science and Engineering (S&E)
Professional Career Track.
Vacancies in this pay band will be
filled in accordance with guidance
issued by DoD.
d. Regression to Lower Level. (See
Figure 8, ‘‘Employee A.’’)
If an employee is contributing less
than expected for the level at which he
or she is being paid, the individual may
regress into a lower pay band through
reduction or denial of general increases
and ineligibility for merit increases.
(This is possible because the NPR plus
the minimum and maximum pay rates
for each pay band will be adjusted
upwards each year by the across-theboard GS percentage increase in basic
pay.) If the employee’s basic pay
regresses to a point below the pay
overlap area between his or her level
and the next lower level, it will no
longer be appropriate to designate him
or her as being in the higher level.
Therefore, the employee will be
formally changed to the lower level. The
employee will be informed of this
change in writing, but procedural and
appeal rights provided by 5 U.S.C. 4303
and 7512 (and related OPM regulations)
will not apply (except in the case of
employees who have veterans’
preference). ONR is providing for
waivers of the statute and regulations
for such actions. Further, because a
change to lower level under such
circumstances is not discretionary, the
change may not be grieved under ONR’s
administrative grievance procedures.
9. CCS Grievance Procedures
An employee may grieve the appraisal
received under CCS using procedures
specifically designed for CCS appraisals.
Under these procedures, the employee’s
grievance will first be considered by the
pay pool panel, who will recommend a
decision to the pay pool manager. If the
employee is not satisfied with the pay
pool manager’s decision, he or she may
file a second-step grievance with the
next higher level ONR management
official. This official will render a final
ONR decision on the grievance.
The following are not grievable: pay
actions resulting from CCS (receipt,
non-receipt or amount of general
increase, merit increase, DCA or
contribution award); reductions in level
without reduction in pay due to
regression (see section IV.C.8.d); any
action for which another appeal or
complaint process exists.
V. Separations
A. Performance-Based Reduction-in-Pay
or Removal Actions
This section applies to reduction in
pay or removal of demonstration project
employees based solely on unacceptable
performance. Adverse action procedures
under 5 CFR part 752 remain
unchanged.
When a supervisor determines during
or at the end of the appraisal period that
the employee is not completing work
assignments satisfactorily, the
supervisor must make a determination
as to whether the employee is
performing unacceptably in one or more
of the critical elements. All CCS
elements applicable to the employee’s
position are critical as defined by 5 CFR
part 430.
Unacceptable performance
determinations must be made by
comparing the employee’s performance
to the acceptable performance standards
established for elements.
At any time during or at the end of the
appraisal period that an employee’s
performance is determined to be
unacceptable in one or more critical
elements, the employee will be
provided assistance in improving his or
her performance. This will normally
include clarifying (or further clarifying)
the meaning of terms used in the
acceptable performance standards (e.g.,
‘‘timely’’ ‘‘thorough research,’’ and
‘‘overall high quality’’) as they relate to
the employee’s specific responsibilities
and assignments. An employee whose
performance is unacceptable after he or
she has been given a reasonable
opportunity to improve may be removed
or reduced in grade or level, in
accordance with the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 4303 and related OPM
regulations. Employees may also be
removed or reduced in grade or level
based on unacceptable performance
under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 7512.
All procedural and appeal rights set
forth in the applicable statute and
related OPM regulations will be
afforded to demonstration project
employees removed or reduced in grade
or level for unacceptable performance.
30215
B. Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Procedures
1. RIF Authority
Under the demonstration project,
ONR would be delegated authority to
approve RIF as defined in Secretary of
the Navy Instruction 12351.5F or its
successor and the use of separation pay
incentives.
2. RIF Definitions
a. Competition in RIF.
When positions are abolished,
employees are released from their
retention levels in inverse order of their
retention standing, beginning with the
employee having the lowest standing. If
an employee is reached for release from
a retention level, he/she could have a
right to be assigned to another position
within their same career track and pay
band or they could have a right to
retreat to a position previously held.
b. Competitive Area.
A separate competitive area will be
established by geographic location for
all personnel included in the ONR
demonstration project.
c. Competitive Level.
Positions in the same occupational
pay band, which are similar enough in
duties and qualifications that employees
can perform the duties and
responsibilities including the selective
placement factor, if any, of any other
position in the competitive level upon
assignment to it, without any loss of
productivity beyond what is normally
expected.
d. Service Computation Date (SCD).
The employee’s basic Federal SCD
would be adjusted for CCS results
credit.
(1) Federal SCD.
An employee’s basic Federal SCD may
be credited with up to 20 years credit
based on the results of the CCS process.
The CCS RIF Assessment Category
would be used to determine the number
of RIF years credited. The CCS RIF
Assessment Category is the combination
of the employee’s standing under the
CCS relative to the NPR and any merit
increase, DCA, contribution award or
promotion. Figure 10 shows the RIF
years available for each CCS RIF
Assessment Category [proposed
revisions to the RIF Assessment
Category are depicted].
FIGURE 10—CS RIF ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES
RIF years
available
Assessment category
0 = Employees within the overcompensated range without any portion of a general increase ...............................................................
1 = Employees receiving maintained pay or any portion of a general increase but no merit increase or contribution (cash/time off) ...
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
0
12
30216
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
FIGURE 10—CS RIF ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES—Continued
RIF years
available
Assessment category
2 = Employees (without a capped salary** or career promotion) receiving a total compensation increase* of 6% or less or with a
capped salary receiving a total compensation increase of 3% or less .................................................................................................
3 = Employees receiving (1) a total compensation increase* greater than 6%; (2) a career promotion; or (3) with a capped salary**
receiving a total compensation increase greater than 3% ....................................................................................................................
16
20
Final RIF Credit: Average of the three most recent CCS Process Results received during the 4-year period prior to the cutoff date.
* Total
compensation includes merit increase, contribution award (cash/time off), and distinguished contributions allowance.
means the employee has the maximum salary for the assigned pay band.
** Capped
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
(2) CCS Process Results.
If an employee has fewer than three
CCS process results, the value (RIF years
available) of the actual number of
process results on record will be
divided by the number of actual process
results on record. In cases where an
employee has no actual CCS process
results, the employee will be given the
additional RIF CCS process results
credit for the most common, or ‘‘modal’’
ONR demonstration project CCS RIF
Assessment Category for the most recent
CCS appraisal period.
(3) Credit from Other Rating Systems.
Employees who have been rated
under different patterns of summary
rating levels will receive RIF appraisal
credit as follows:
—If there are any ratings to be credited
for the RIF given under a rating
system which includes one or more
levels above fully successful (Level 3),
employees will receive credit as
follows: 12 years for Level 3, 16 years
for Level 4, or 20 years for Level 5; or
—If an employee comes from a system
with no levels above Fully Successful
(Level 3), they will receive credit
based on the demonstration project’s
modal CCS RIF assessment category.
(4). RIF Cutoff Date.
To provide adequate time to properly
determine employee retention standing,
the cutoff date for use of new CCS
process results is set at 30 days prior to
the date of issuance of RIF notices.
3. Displacement Rights
a. Displacement Process.
Once the position to be abolished has
been identified, the incumbent of that
position may displace another employee
within the incumbent’s current career
track and pay band when the incumbent
has a higher retention standing and is
fully qualified for the position occupied
by an employee with a lower standing.
If there are no displacement rights
within the incumbent’s current career
track and pay band, the incumbent may
exercise his or her displacement rights
to any position previously held in the
next lower pay band, regardless of
career track, when the position is held
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
by an employee with a lower retention
standing. In the case of all preference
eligibles, they may displace up to the
equivalent of three grades or intervals
below the highest equivalent grade of
their current pay band in the same or a
different career track regardless of
whether they previously held the
position provided they are fully
qualified for the position and the
position is occupied by an employee
with a lower retention standing.
Preference eligibles with a compensable
service connected disability of 30
percent or more may displace an
additional two GS grades or intervals
(total of five grades) below the highest
equivalent grade of their current pay
band provided they have previously
held the position and the position is
occupied by an employee in the same
subgroup with a later RIF service
computation date.
b. Retention Standing.
Retention is based on tenure,
veterans’ preference, length of service,
and CCS process results. Competing
employees are listed on a retention
register in the following order: Tenure I
(career employees), Tenure II (careerconditional employees), and Tenure III
(contingent employees). Each tenure
group has three subgroups (30% or
higher compensable veterans, other
veterans, and non-veterans) and
employees appear on the retention
register in that order. Within each
subgroup, employees are in order of
years of service adjusted to include CCS
process results.
c. Vacant Positions.
Assignment may be made to any
available vacant position including
those with promotion potential in the
competitive area.
d. Ineligible for Displacement Rights.
Employees who have been notified in
writing that their performance is
considered to be unacceptable are
ineligible for displacement rights.
e. Change to Lower Level Due to an
Adverse or Performance-based Action.
An employee who has received a
written decision to change him or her to
a lower level due to an adverse or
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
performance-based action will compete
from the position to which he or she
will be or has been demoted.
4. Notice Period
The notice period and procedures in
5 CFR subpart H, section 351.801 will
be followed.
5. RIF Appeals
Under the demonstration project,
employees affected by a RIF action,
other than a reassignment, maintain
their right to appeal to the Merit
Systems Protection Board if they feel the
reason for the RIF is not valid or if they
think the process or procedures were
not properly applied.
6. Separation Incentives
ONR will have delegated authority to
approve separation incentives and will
use the current calculation methodology
of a lump sum payment equal to an
employee’s severance pay calculation or
$25,000, whichever is less.
7. Severance Pay
Employees will be covered by the
severance pay rules in 5 CFR part 550,
subpart G, except that ONR will
establish rules for determining a
‘‘reasonable offer’’ according to the
provisions of 5 CFR 536.104.
8. Outplacement Assistance
All outplacement assistance currently
available would be continued under the
demonstration project.
VI. Demonstration Project Transition
A. Initial Conversion or Movement to
the Demonstration Project
1. Placement Into Career Tracks and Pay
Bands
Conversion or movement of GS
employees into the demonstration
project will be into the career track and
pay band which corresponds to the
employee’s current GS grade and basic
pay. If conversion into the
demonstration project is accompanied
by a simultaneous change in the
geographic location of the employee’s
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
duty station, the employee’s overall GS
pay entitlements (including locality
rate) in the new area will be determined
before converting the employee’s pay to
the demonstration project pay system.
Employees will be assured of placement
within the new system without loss in
total pay. Once under the demonstration
project, employee progression through
the career tracks and pay bands up to
their target pay band is dependent upon
contribution score, not upon previous
methods (e.g., WGI’s, QSI’s, or career
promotions as previously defined).
ONR proposes the addition of
language to clarify procedures for noncompetitive placements into the
demonstration project. Specifically,
employees who enter the demonstration
project after initial implementation by
lateral transfer, reassignment, or
realignment will be subject to the same
pay conversion rules.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
2. Conversion of Retained Grade and
Pay Employees
ONR’s workforce will be grouped into
career tracks and associated pay levels
with designated pay ranges rather than
the traditional grade and step.
Therefore, grade and pay retention will
be eliminated. ONR will grant
‘‘maintained pay’’ (as defined in section
III.G.2, ‘‘Maintained Pay’’), which is
related to the current meaning of
‘‘retained pay’’ but does not provide for
indefinite retention of pay except in
certain situations. Employees’ currently
on grade or pay retention will be
immediately placed on maintained pay
at their current rate of basic pay if this
rate exceeds the maximum rate for their
pay band and ‘‘grandfathered’’ in the
appropriate pay band. Employees on
grade retention will be placed in the pay
band encompassing the grade of their
current position. Employees will receive
half of the across-the-board GS
percentage increase in basic pay and the
full locality pay increase until their
basic pay is within the appropriate basic
pay range for their current position
without time limitation.
3. WGI Buy-In
The participation of all covered ONR
employees in the demonstration project
is mandatory. However, acceptance of
the system by ONR employees is
essential to the success of the
demonstration project. Therefore, on the
date that employees are converted to the
project pay plans, they will be given a
permanent increase in pay equal to the
earned (time spent in step) portion of
their next WGI based on the value of the
WGI at the time of conversion so that
they will not feel they are losing a pay
entitlement accrued under the GS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
system. Employees will not be eligible
for this basic pay increase if their
current rating of record is unacceptable
at the time of conversion. There will be
no prorated payment for employees who
are at step 10 or receiving a retained rate
at the time of conversion into the
demonstration project.
4. Career Promotion Eligibility
ONR proposes to adopt MRMC’s
provisions for compensating employees
who would have become eligible for
career promotions during the first 12
months of the demonstration project but
for conversion to the demonstration
project pay bands. Employees who
qualify under this provision will receive
pay increases for noncompetitive
promotion equivalents when the grade
level of the promotion is encompassed
within the same pay band, the
employee’s performance warrants the
promotion, and the promotion would
have otherwise occurred during that
period. Employees who receive an inlevel promotion at the time of
conversion will not receive a WGI BuyIn equivalent as defined above.
5. Conversion of Special Salary Rate
Employees
Employees who are in positions
covered by a special salary rate prior to
entering the demonstration project will
no longer be considered special salary
rate employees under the demonstration
project. These employees will, therefore,
be eligible for full locality pay. The
adjusted salaries of these employees
will not change. Rather, the employees
will receive a new basic rate of pay
computed by dividing their basic
adjusted pay (higher of special salary
rate or locality rate) by the locality pay
factor for their area. A full locality
adjustment will then be added to the
new basic pay rate. Adverse action will
not apply to the conversion process as
there will be no change in total salary.
However, if an employee’s new basic
pay rate after conversion to the
demonstration project pay schedule
exceeds the maximum basic pay
authorized for the pay band, the
employee will be granted maintained
pay under paragraph III.G.2 until the
employee’s salary is within the range of
the pay band. For example, an
Electronics Engineer, GS–855–9, step 5,
is paid $59,568 per annum in
accordance with special GS salary rates
as of January 2010 per Table Number:
0422. The employee is located in the
locality area of Washington-Baltimore,
DC-MD-VA-WV. Under the
demonstration project, the computation
of the engineer’s new basic rate of pay
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30217
with a full locality adjustment and WGI
buy-in is computed as follows:
a. Basic adjusted pay divided by
locality pay factor = new basic rate of
pay.
b. New basic rate of pay multiplied by
the full locality adjustment for current
area = full locality adjustment amount
for special rate employees.
c. New basic rate of pay + WGI buyin amount × locality pay factor =
demonstration special rate for
conversion.
6. Conversion of Employees on
Temporary Promotions
Employees who are on temporary
promotions at the time of conversion
will be returned to their grade and step
of record prior to conversion. These
employees will be converted to a pay
band following the procedures
described in Section IV.A.1. After
conversion, the temporary promotion
may be reinstated for the remainder of
the original 120-day timeframe. If the
grade of the temporary position is
associated with a higher pay band, the
employee will be temporarily placed in
the appropriate higher band while on
the temporary promotion, following the
procedures described in Section
II.A.5.b.i. After the temporary
promotion has ended, the employee will
be returned to the salary and pay band
established upon conversion, following
the procedures described in Section
II.A.5.b.iv.
7. Non-Competitive Movement Into the
Demonstration Project
Employees who enter the
demonstration project after initial
implementation by lateral transfer,
reassignment, or realignment will be
subject to the same pay conversion rules
and will, therefore, be eligible for full
locality pay. Specifically, adjustments to
the employee’s basic pay for a step
increase or a non-competitive career
ladder promotion will be computed as
a prorated share of the current value of
the step or promotion increase based
upon the number of full weeks an
employee has completed toward the
next higher step or grade at the time the
employee moves into the project.
B. CCS Start-Up
ONR expects to place employees on
CCS elements, descriptors,
discriminators, and standards around
October 2010 with conversion to
demonstration project pay plans before
the end of April 2011. The CCS process
will be used to appraise ONR employees
at the end of the 2010–2011 cycle which
would occur on September 30, 2011.
ONR expects the first CCS payout to
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30218
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
occur at the beginning of the first full
pay period in January 2012.
C. Training
An extensive training program is
planned for everyone in the
demonstration project including the
supervisors, managers, and
administrative staff. Training will be
tailored, as discussed below, to fit the
requirements of every employee
included in the demonstration project
and will address employee concerns as
well as the benefits to employees. In
addition, leadership training will be
provided, as needed, to managers and
supervisors as the new system places
more responsibility and decision
making authority on them. ONR training
personnel will provide local
coordination and facilities,
supplemented by contractor support as
needed. Training will be provided at the
appropriate stage of the implementation
process.
1. Types of Training
Training packages will be developed
to encompass all aspects of the project
and validated prior to training the
workforce. Specifically, training
packages will be developed for the
following groups of employees:
a. Employees.
ONR demonstration project
employees will be provided an overview
of the demonstration project and
employee processes and
responsibilities.
b. Supervisors and Managers.
Supervisors and managers under the
demonstration project will be provided
training in supervisory and managerial
processes and responsibilities under the
demonstration project.
c. Support Personnel.
Administrative support personnel,
HRO personnel, financial management
personnel, and Management
Information Systems Staff will be
provided training on administrative
processes and responsibilities under the
demonstration project.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
D. New Hires Into the Demonstration
Project
The following steps will be followed
to place employees (new hires) entering
the system:
1. The career track and pay band will
be determined based upon the
employee’s education and experience in
relation to the duties and
responsibilities of the position in which
he or she is being placed, consistent
with OPM qualification standards.
2. Basic pay will be set based upon
available labor market considerations
relative to special qualifications
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
requirements, scarcity of qualified
candidates, programmatic urgency, and
education and experience of the new
candidate.
3. Employees placed through the DON
RPL, the DoD PPP, or the Federal
Interagency Career Transition
Assistance Plan who are eligible for
maintained pay will receive one half of
the across-the-board GS percentage
increase in basic pay and the full
locality pay increase until the
employee’s basic pay is within the basic
pay range of the career track and pay
band to which assigned. Employees are
eligible for maintained pay as long as
there is no break in service and if the
employee’s rate of pay exceeds the
maximum rate of his or her pay band.
E. Conversion or Movement From
Demonstration Project
In the event the demonstration project
is terminated or employees leave the
demonstration project through
promotion, change to lower grade,
reassignment or transfer, conversion
back to the GS system may be necessary.
The converted GS grade and GS rate of
pay must be determined before
movement or conversion out of the
demonstration project and any
accompanying geographic movement,
promotion, or other simultaneous
action. An employee will not be
converted at a level which is lower than
the GS grade held immediately prior to
entering the Demonstration project;
unless, since that time, the employee
has undergone a reduction in pay band.
The converted GS grade and rate will
become the employee’s actual GS grade
and rate after leaving the demonstration
project and will be used to determine
the pay action and GS pay
administration rules for employees who
leave the project to accept a position in
the traditional Civil Service system. The
following procedures will be used to
convert the employee’s demonstration
project pay band to a GS equivalent
grade and the employee’s demonstration
project rate of pay to the GS equivalent
rate of pay.
1. Grade Determination
Employees will be converted to a GS
grade based on a comparison of the
employee’s current adjusted rate of
basic pay to the highest GS applicable
rate range considering only those grade
levels that are included in the
employee’s current pay band. The
highest GS applicable rate range
includes GS basic rates, locality rates,
and special salary rates. Once a grade
range is determined, the following
procedures will be used to determine
the GS grade:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
a. Identify the highest GS grade
within the current pay band that
accommodates the employee’s adjusted
rate of basic pay (including any locality
payment).
b. If the employee’s adjusted rate of
basic pay equals or exceeds the
applicable step 4 rate of the identified
highest GS grade, the employee is
converted to that grade.
c. If the employee’s adjusted rate of
basic pay is lower than the applicable
step 4 of the highest grade, the
employee is converted to the next lower
grade.
d. If under the above-described ‘‘step
4’’ rule, the employee’s adjusted project
rate exceeds the maximum rate of the
grade assigned but fits in the rate range
for the next higher applicable grade (i.e.,
between step 1 and step 4), then the
employee shall be converted to the next
higher applicable grade.
e. For two-grade interval occupations,
conversion should not be made to an
intervening (even) grade level below
GS–11.
f. Employees in Level IV of the
Administrative Specialist and
Professional Career Track will convert
to the GS–13 level.
2. Pay Setting
Pay conversion will be done before
any geographic movement or other payrelated action that coincides with the
employee’s movement or conversion out
of the demonstration project. The
employee’s pay within the converted GS
grade is set by converting the
employee’s demonstration project rate
of pay to a GS rate of pay as follows:
a. The employee’s demonstration
project adjusted rate of pay (including
locality) is converted to a rate on the
highest applicable adjusted rate range
for the converted GS grade. For
example, if the highest applicable GS
rate range for the employee is a special
salary rate range, the applicable special
rate salary table is used to convert the
employee’s pay.
b. When converting an employee’s
pay, if the rate of pay falls between two
steps of the conversion grade, the rate
must be set at the higher step.
c. Employees whose basic pay
exceeds the maximum basic pay of the
highest GS grade for their pay band will
be converted to the highest grade and
step in their pay band. Upon
conversion, the maximum base pay will
be at the step 10 level normally with no
provision for retained pay.
3. Employees in Positions Classified
Above GS–15
Conversion and pay retention
instructions for employees and
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
VIII. Demonstration Project Evaluation
Plan
positions in Pay Band V of the S&E
Professional Career Track will be
contingent on guidance provided by
DoD.
4. Determining Date of Last Equivalent
Increase
The last equivalent increase will be
the date the employee received a CCS
pay increase, was eligible to receive a
CCS pay increase, or received a
promotion, whichever occurred last.
C. Personnel Administration
All personnel laws, regulations, and
guidelines not waived by this plan will
remain in effect. Basic employee rights
will be safeguarded and Merit System
Principles will be maintained. Servicing
Human Resources Service Centers will
continue to process personnel-related
actions and provide consultative and
other appropriate services.
D. Automation
ONR will continue to use the Defense
Civilian Personnel Data System
(DCPDS) for the processing of
personnel-related data. Payroll servicing
will continue from the respective
payroll offices.
An automated tool will be used to
support computation of performance
related pay increases and awards and
other personnel processes and systems
associated with this project.
E. Experimentation and Revision
Many aspects of a demonstration
project are experimental. Modifications
may be made from time to time as
experience is gained, results are
analyzed, and conclusions are reached
on how the new system is working.
DoDI 1400.37, July 28, 2009, provides
instructions for adopting other STRL
flexibilities, making minor changes to
an existing demonstration project, and
requesting new initiatives.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
VII. Demonstration Project Duration
Section 342 of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1995
(Pub. L. 103–337) does not require a
mandatory expiration date for this
demonstration project. The project
evaluation plan addresses how each
intervention will be comprehensively
evaluated. Major changes and
modifications to the interventions may
be made using the procedures in DoDI
1400.37, if formal evaluation data
warrant a change. At the 5-year point,
the entire demonstration will be
examined for either: (a) Permanent
implementation, (b) modification and
another test period, or (c) termination of
the project.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Consistent with DoD guidance, ONR
proposes following the same evaluation
plan as is being used by NRL and the
other STRL Demonstration Projects.
Accordingly, standard language for
Evaluation Plan, Evaluation, and
Method of Data Collection (sections
V.B., V.C, and V.D., respectively)
provided by DoD is used in this
document to describe ONR’s plans and
procedures for the demonstration
project evaluation. The use of parallel
evaluation methodologies will facilitate
comparisons across the demonstration
projects to derive higher-order
conclusions about the benefits,
challenges, and overall effectiveness of
these programs.
A. Overview
Chapter 47 of title 5 U.S.C. requires
that an evaluation be performed to
measure the effectiveness of the
proposed laboratory demonstration
project, and its impact on improving
public management. A comprehensive
evaluation plan for the entire laboratory
demonstration program, originally
covering 24 DoD laboratories, was
developed by a joint OPM/DoD
Evaluation Committee in 1995. This
plan was submitted to the Office of
Defense Research & Engineering and
was subsequently approved. The main
purpose of the evaluation is to
determine whether the waivers granted
result in a more effective personnel
system and improvements in ultimate
outcomes (i.e., laboratory effectiveness,
mission accomplishment, and customer
satisfaction).
B. Evaluation Model
Appendix G shows an intervention
model for the evaluation of the
demonstration project. The model is
designed to evaluate two levels of
organizational performance:
Intermediate and ultimate outcomes.
The intermediate outcomes are defined
as the results from specific personnel
system changes and the associated
waivers of law and regulation expected
to improve human resource (HR)
management (i.e., cost, quality,
timeliness). The ultimate outcomes are
determined through improved
organizational performance, mission
accomplishment, and customer
satisfaction. Although it is not possible
to establish a direct causal link between
changes in the HR management system
and organizational effectiveness, it is
hypothesized that the new HR system
will contribute to improved
organizational effectiveness.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
30219
Organizational performance measures
established by the organization will be
used to evaluate the impact of a new HR
system on the ultimate outcomes. The
evaluation of the new HR system for any
given organization will take into
account the influence of three factors on
organizational performance: Context,
degree of implementation, and support
of implementation. The context factor
refers to the impact which intervening
variables (i.e., downsizing, changes in
mission, or the economy) can have on
the effectiveness of the program. The
degree of implementation considers the
extent to which the:
(1) HR changes are given a fair trial
period;
(2) changes are implemented; and
(3) changes conform to the HR
interventions as planned.
The support of implementation factor
accounts for the impact that factors such
as training, internal regulations and
automated support systems have on the
support available for program
implementation. The support for
program implementation factor can also
be affected by the personal
characteristics (e.g., attitudes) of
individuals who are implementing the
program.
The degree to which the project is
implemented and operated will be
tracked to ensure that the evaluation
results reflect the project as it was
intended. Data will be collected to
measure changes in both intermediate
and ultimate outcomes, as well as any
unintended outcomes, which may
happen as a result of any organizational
change. In addition, the evaluation will
track the impact of the project and its
interventions on veterans and other
protected groups, the Merit System
Principles, and the Prohibited Personnel
Practices. Additional measures may be
added to the model in the event that
changes or modifications are made to
the demonstration plan.
The intervention model at Appendix
D will be used to measure the
effectiveness of the personnel system
interventions implemented. The
intervention model specifies each
personnel system change or
‘‘intervention’’ that will be measured
and shows:
(1) The expected effects of the
intervention,
(2) the corresponding measures, and
(3) the data sources for obtaining the
measures.
Although the model makes
predictions about the outcomes of
specific interventions, causal
attributions about the full impact of
specific interventions will not always be
possible for several reasons. For
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30220
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
example, many of the initiatives are
expected to interact with each other and
contribute to the same outcomes. In
addition, the impact of changes in the
HR system may be mitigated by context
variables (e.g., the job market,
legislation, and internal support
systems) or support factors (e.g., training
and automation support systems).
C. Evaluation
A modified quasi-experimental design
will be used for the evaluation of the
STRL Personnel Demonstration
Program. Because most of the eligible
laboratories are participating in the
program, a title 5 U.S.C. comparison
group will be compiled from the
Civilian Personnel Data File (CPDF).
This comparison group will consist of
workforce data from Government-wide
research organizations in civilian
Federal agencies with missions and job
series matching those in the DoD
laboratories. This comparison group
will be used primarily in the analysis of
pay banding costs and turnover rates.
D. Method of Data Collection
Data from several sources will be used
in the evaluation. Information from
existing management information
systems and from personnel office
records will be supplemented with
perceptual survey data from employees
to assess the effectiveness and
perception of the project. The multiple
sources of data collection will provide
a more complete picture as to how the
interventions are working. The
information gathered from one source
will serve to validate information
obtained through another source. In so
doing, the confidence of overall findings
will be strengthened as the different
collection methods substantiate each
other.
Both quantitative and qualitative data
will be used when evaluating outcomes.
The following data will be collected:
(1) Workforce data;
(2) Personnel office data;
(3) Employee attitude surveys;
(4) Focus group data;
(5) Local site historian logs and
implementation information;
(6) Customer satisfaction surveys; and
(7) Core measures of organizational
performance.
The evaluation effort will consist of
two phases, formative and summative
evaluation, covering at least five years to
permit inter- and intra-organizational
estimates of effectiveness. The formative
evaluation phase will include baseline
data collection and analysis,
implementation evaluation, and interim
assessments. The formal reports and
interim assessments will provide
information on the accuracy of project
operation, and current information on
impact of the project on veterans and
protected groups, Merit System
Principles, and Prohibited Personnel
Practices. The summative evaluation
will focus on an overall assessment of
project outcomes after five years. The
final report will provide information on
how well the HR system changes
achieved the desired goals, which
interventions were most effective, and
whether the results can be generalized
to other Federal installations.
IX. Demonstration Project Costs
A. Cost Discipline
An objective of the demonstration
project is to ensure in-house cost
discipline. A baseline will be
established at the start of the project and
labor expenditures will be tracked
yearly. Implementation costs (including
project development, automation costs,
WGI buy-in costs, and evaluation costs)
are considered one-time costs and will
not be included in the cost discipline.
The CNR or designee will track
personnel cost changes and recommend
adjustments if required to achieve the
objective of cost discipline.
B. Implementation Costs
Current cost estimates associated with
implementing the ONR demonstration
project are shown in Figure 11. These
include automation of systems such as
the CCSDS, training, and project
evaluation. The automation and training
costs are startup costs. Transition costs
are one-time costs. Costs for project
evaluation will be ongoing for at least
five years.
FIGURE 11—PROJECTED IMPLEMENTATION COSTS
[Then year dollars]
FY 10
FY 11
FY 12
FY 13
FY 14
Training ..................................................................................................................................
Project Evaluation ..................................................................................................................
Automation .............................................................................................................................
Transition ...............................................................................................................................
$200K
100K
97K
0
$200K
50K
25K
500K
$56K
100K
25K
0
$25K
50K
25K
0
$25K
100K
25K
0
.
Totals ..............................................................................................................................
397K
775K
181K
100K
150K
X. Automation Support
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
A. General
One of the major goals of the
demonstration project is to streamline
the personnel processes to increase cost
effectiveness. Automation must play an
integral role in achieving that goal.
Without the necessary automation to
support the interventions proposed for
the demonstration project, optimal cost
benefit cannot be realized. In addition,
adequate information to support
decision-making must be available to
managers if line management is to
assume greater authority and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
responsibility for human resources
management.
Automation to support the
demonstration project is required at two
distinct levels. At the DON and DoD
level, automation support (in the form
of changes to the DCPDS) is required to
facilitate processing and reporting of
demonstration project personnel
actions. At the ONR level, automation
support (in the form of local processing
applications) is required to facilitate
management processes and decisionmaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
B. Defense Civilian Personnel Data
System (DCPDS)
Since DCPDS is a legacy system,
efforts have been made to minimize
changes to the system; and, therefore,
the resources required to make the
necessary changes. The detailed
specifications for required changes to
DCPDS will be provided in the System
Change Request (SCR), Form 804.
C. Core Document (COREDOC)
The COREDOC application is a DoD
system which may require modification
to accommodate the interventions in
this demonstration project. Specifically,
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30221
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
there is an RD that replaces the position
description in the basic application;
career tracks and pay bands replace GS
grades; and a CCS Assessment Summary
that replaces performance elements.
D. RIF Support System (RIFSS)
The RIFSS is an automated tool used
by human resources specialists to
support RIF processing. Under the
demonstration project, RIF rules are
modified to increase the credit for
contributions and limit the rounds of
competition. The AutoRIF application,
developed by DoD, may need to be
modified to accommodate these process
changes.
E. Contribution-Based Compensation
System Data System
This automated system is required as
an internal control and as a mechanism
to equate contribution scores to
appropriate rates of basic pay. This
system will allow pay pool managers to
develop a spreadsheet that will assist
them in determining an appropriate
merit increase or contribution award or
both based on the overall contribution
score for each individual. It will also be
ONR demonstration project features
(ONR FR Section)
used as an internal control to ensure
that the permanent and nonpermanent
money allotted to each pay pool is not
exceeded. It will further allow pay pool
managers to visualize the effects of
giving large basic pay increases or
awards to high contributors, and the
effects of withholding either the general
or merit increase or both of those who
are low contributors, or in the
overcompensated range.
Appendix A: Summary of
Demonstration Project Features
Adopted by ONR
Originating lab
demo
Modification
Originating FR Notice
reference
Flexibilities
Hiring Authority (Section III.A.–C.) .........
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
Noncitizen Hiring (Section III.D.) ............
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
Expanded Detail Authority (Section
III.E.).
Extended Probationary Period for New
Employees (Section III.F.).
Definitions (Section III.G.) ......................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
Pay Setting Determinations Outside
CCS (Section III.H.).
Priority Placement Program (Section
III.I.).
Expanded Temporary Promotion (Section III.J.).
Voluntary Emeritus Program (Section
III.K.).
• Added procedures for Restoration to Duty for deployed
individuals.
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
• Expanded eligibility for the Voluntary Emeritus Program
to all retired and separated employees, not just engineers and scientists.
Adopting three of NRL’s four career tracks/pay plans ........
ONR chooses not to adopt the Science & Engineering
Technical career track because the types of positions
that fall into this career track do not exist at ONR.
The ARSAE designations will not be adopted but instead
will be rolled into the new above GS–15 levels initiative
to be established by DoD.
Position management methods established by the new
DoD above GS–15 level initiative, rather than the DoD
40-position limit.
• Revised critical elements to ensure applicability to ONR
personnel.
• Described a more general approach for annual budgeting for merit increases, to provide greater flexibility in
establishing and amending internal procedures.
• Clarified the use of merit increase funds during each
payout cycle; funds may not be carried over to the next
payout cycle.
• No substantive changes made ........................................
AMRDEC ........
• Amended the CCS RIF assessment categories ..............
• Added a definition for Competition in RIF so employees
released from retention level will have the right to be
assigned to another position within the same career
track/level, or retreat to a previously held position.
Position Classification (Section IV.A.) ....
Integrated Pay Schedule (Section IV.B.)
Contribution-based Compensation System (CCS) (Section IV.C.).
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Performance-based Reduction-in-Pay or
Removal Actions (Section V.A.).
Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Procedures
(Section V.B.).
NRL ................
Pages 33981–33982,
Section III.A–C.
Page 33982, Section
III.D.
Page 33982, Section
III.E.
Page 33982, Section
III.F.
Pages 33982–33983,
Section III.G.
Pages 33983–33984,
Section III.H.
Page 33984, Section
III.I.
Page 33984, Section
III.J.
Page 34889, Section
III.D.2.
NRL ................
Pages 33984–33989,
Section IV.A.
NRL ................
Pages 33989–33991,
Section IV.B.
NRL ................
Pages 33991–34001,
Section IV.C.
NRL ................
NRL ................
Page 34001, Section
V.A
Page 34001, Section.V.B.
NRL ................
Page 34003, Section
VI.A.
Administrative Procedures
Initial Conversion or Movement to the
Demonstration Project (Section VI.A.).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
• Added procedures for converting employees who are on
Temporary Promotions.
• Clarified procedures for non-competitive movement into
the demonstration project (e.g., lateral transfer, reassignment, or realignment).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30222
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
ONR demonstration project features
(ONR FR Section)
Modification
Originating lab
demo
CCS Startup (Section VI.B.) ...................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
Training (Section VI.C.) ..........................
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
New Hires into the Demonstration
Project (Section VI.D.).
Conversion or Movement from the Demonstration Project (Section VII.E.).
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
• Clarified procedures for setting pay for employees
whose basic pay exceeds the maximum basic pay of
the highest GS grade for their career level.
• No substantive changes made ........................................
NRL ................
Demonstration Project Duration (Section
VII.).
Demonstration Project Evaluation Plan
(Section VIII.).
Cost Containment and Controls (Section
IX.).
Automation Support (Section X.) ...........
• Used standard STRL evaluation language provided by NRL ................
DoD; which is virtually identical to NRL’s original section.
• Described a more general approach to cost discipline, NRL ................
to enable ONR to develop internal procedures and
make modifications over time, as needed.
• No substantive changes made ........................................ NRL ................
Appendix B: Required Waivers to Laws
and Regulations
Public Law 106–398 gave the DoD the
authority to experiment with several
personnel management innovations. In
addition to the authorities granted by the
law, the following are waivers of law and
regulation that will be necessary for
NRL ................
implementation of the demonstration project.
In due course, additional laws and
regulations may be identified for waiver
request.
The following waivers and adaptations of
certain title 5 U.S.C. provisions are required
only to the extent that these statutory
provisions limit or are inconsistent with the
Originating FR Notice
reference
Page 34003, Section
VI.B.
Page 34004, Section
VI.C.
Page 34004, Section
VI.D.
Pages 34004–34005,
Section VI.E.
Page 34005, Section
VII.
Pages 34005–34007,
Section VIII.
Pages 34007–34008,
Section IX.
Page 34008, Section
X.
actions contemplated under this
demonstration project. Nothing in this plan
is intended to preclude the demonstration
project from adopting or incorporating any
law or regulation enacted, adopted, or
amended after the effective date of this
demonstration project.
Waivers of Law and Regulation
Title V, United States Code
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Chapter 31, section 3111: Acceptance of Volunteer Service. Waived to
allow for a Voluntary Emeritus Program in addition to student volunteers.
Chapter 31, section 3132: The Senior Executive Service: Definitions
and Exclusions. Waived as necessary to allow for the Pay Band VI
of the S&E Occupational Family.
Part 300, subpart F, sections 300.601 to 300.605—Time-in-grade Restrictions. Waive in entirety
Chapter 33, subchapter 1, section 3318(a)–Competitive Service; Selection from Certificate. Waive.
Chapter 33, section 3324: Appointments to Positions Classified Above
GS–15. Waived the requirement for OPM approval of appointments
to positions classified above GS–15.
Part 300, sections 300.601 through 605: Time-in-grade restrictions.
Waived to eliminate time-in-grade restrictions in the demonstration
project.
Part 308, sections 308.101 through 308.103: Volunteer service. Waived
to allow for a Voluntary Emeritus Program in addition to student volunteers.
Part 315, section 315.801(a), 315.801(b)(1), (c), and (e), and
315.802(a) and (b)(1): Probationary period and Length of probationary period. Waived to the extent necessary to allow for up to a
three-year probationary period and to permit termination during the
extended probationary period without using adverse action procedures for those employees serving a probationary period under an
initial appointment except for those with veterans’ preference.
Part 315, section 315.901: Statutory requirement. Waived to the extent
necessary to replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band.’’
Part 332, subpart D, section 332.404—Order of Section of Certificates.
Waive in entirety.
Part 335, subpart A, section 335.103(c)(1)(i), (ii)—Agency Promotion
Program.
Waive to allow temporary promotions and details to a higher level position without competition.
Part 335, subpart A, section 335.104—Eligibility for Career Ladder Promotion. Waive in entirety.
Part 337, subpart A, section 337.101(a)—Rating Applicants. Waive
when 15 or fewer qualified candidates.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Chapter 33, subchapter III, section 3341(b) Details—Within Executive
or Military Departments. Waive in entirety.
Part 351, subpart G, section 351.701—Assignment Involving Displacement.
(a) Waive to allow minimally successful or equivalent to be defined as
an employee whose current CCS RIF Assessment Category score is
12 or better and does not have a current written notification of unacceptable performance.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Title V, United States Code
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Chapter 43, section 4302: Waived to the extent necessary to substitute
‘‘pay band’’ for ‘‘grade’’.
Chapter 43, subchapter I, section 4303—Actions Based on Unacceptable Performance. Waive to allow coverage of ‘‘reduction in pay level
based on unacceptable performance.’’ Waive to exclude from coverage (procedural and appeal rights) reductions in pay band with no
reduction in pay, when such actions result from regression of pay
into a lower pay band through reductions and denials of general increase (‘‘slippage’’). This exclusion will not apply to employees with
veterans’ preference.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Chapter 43, subpart I, section 4303(f)(3)—Waive to allow exclusion of
employees in the excepted service who have not completed a trial
period, except those with veterans’ preference.
Chapter 43, subchapter I, section 4304(b)(1) and (3)—Responsibilities
of OPM. Waive in entirety.
Chapter 45, subchapter I, section 4502(a) and (b)—Waive to permit
ONR to approve awards up to $25,000 for individual employees.
Chapter 51, sections 5101 to 5113—Classification. Waive in entirety
except section 5104 to the extent needed to permit classification of
pay bands and CCS descriptors into logically defined level
groupings..
Chapter 53, subpart I, section 5301—Pay Policy. Waive in entirety .......
Chapter 53, subchapter I, section 5302(8) and (9)—Pay Definition and
section 5304—Locality-Based Comparability Payments. Waive to the
extent necessary to allow demonstration project employees to be
treated as GS employees and basic rates of pay under the demonstration project to be treated as scheduled rates of basic pay. Employees in Pay Band V for the S&E Professional Track to be treated
as ST employees for the purposes of these provisions.
Chapter 53, subchapter I, section 5303—Annual Adjustments to Pay
Schedules. Waive in entirety.
Chapter 53, subpart I, section 5303—Special Pay Authority. Waive in
entirety..
Chapter 53, subchapter III, sections 5331 to 5336—GS Pay Rates.
Waive in entirety.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
30223
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
(b) and (c) Assignment rights (bump and retreat). Waive to the extent
that the distinction between bump and retreat is eliminated and to
allow displacement to be limited to the employee’s current career
track and pay band or, if there are no displacement rights in the employee’s current pay band, to any position previously held in the next
lower pay band regardless of career track. Preference eligibles may
displace up to the equivalent of 3 grades or intervals below the highest equivalent grade of their current pay band in the same or different career track regardless of whether they previously held the position provided they are fully qualified and the position is occupied by
an employee with a lower retention standing. Preference eligibles
with a compensable service connected disability of 30 percent or
more may displace an additional 2 GS grades or intervals (total of 5
grades) below the highest equivalent grade of their current pay band
provided they previously held the position and the position is occupied by an employee in the same subgroup with a later RIF service
computation date.
(d) Limitation. Waive.
(e)(1) Waive.
Part 351, subpart B, section 351.403(a)
Competitive Level. Waive to allow establishing competitive levels consisting of all ONR demo positions in a competitive area, which are in
the same pay band level and career track, and which are similar
enough in duties, qualifications, and requirements, including any selective placement factors, pay schedules, and working conditions so
that the incumbent of one position may be reassigned to any other
position in the level without undue interruption.
Part 351.402(b), subpart D: Competitive area. Waived to the extent
necessary to allow for separate competitive areas for demonstration
project and non-demonstration project employees.
Part 351, subpart E, section 351.504—Performance Credit for RIF.
Waive in entirety.
Part 430, subpart B, section 430.207(b)—Waive to the extent this section requires one or more progress reviews during each appraisal
period.
Part 430, subpart B, section 430.210—OPM Responsibilities. Waive in
entirety. Part 432, section 432.101 to 432.107—Performance Reduction in Grade and Removal Actions. Waive to allow coverage of ‘‘reduction in pay level based on unacceptable performance.’’ Waive to
exclude from coverage (procedural and appeal rights) reduction in
pay band with no reduction in pay, when such action results from regression of pay into a lower pay band through reductions and denials of general increase (‘‘slippage’’). This exclusion will not apply to
employees with veterans’ preference.
Part 451, subpart A, section 451.103(c)(2)—Waive with respect to contribution awards under the ONR CCS.
Part 451, subpart A, sections 451.106(b) and 451.107(b)—Waive to
permit ONR to approve awards up to $25,000 for individual employees.
Part 511—Classification Under the GS. Waive in entirety with an exception for appeal rights and time constraints under subpart F, sections 511.603, 511.604, and 511.605.
Part 520, subpart C—Specialty Salary Rate Schedules. Waive in entirety.
Part 531, subpart B—Determining Rate of Basic Pay. Waive in entirety.
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30224
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Title V, United States Code
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
Chapter 53, subchapter VI, sections 5361 to 5366—Grade and Pay
Retention. Waive to entirety.
Chapter 55, section 5545 (d)—Hazardous Duty Differential. Waive to
the extent necessary to allow demonstration project employees to be
treated as GS employees. This waiver does not apply to employees
in Pay Band V of the S&E Professional Career Track.
Chapter 57, subchapter IV, section 5753 to 5755—Recruitment and
Relocation Bonuses, Retention Allowances, and Supervisory Differential. Waive to the extent necessary to allow (1) employees and
positions under the demonstration project to be treated as employees and positions under the GS and (2) employees in Level V of the
S&E Professional career track to be treated as ST employees for
these purposes.
Chapter 59, subchapter III, section 5924—Cost-of-living Allowances.
Waive to the extent necessary to provide that COLA’s paid to employees under the demonstration project are paid in accordance with
regulations prescribed by the President (as delegated to OPM).
Chapter 75, sections 7501(1) and 7511 (a)(1)(A)(ii)—Removal Suspension for More Than 14 Days, Reduction in Grade or Pay, or Furlough. Waived to the extent necessary to allow for up to a three-year
probationary period and to permit termination during the extended
probationary period without using adverse action procedures for
those employees serving a probationary period under an initial appointment
except
for
those
with
veterans’
preference
7511(a)(I)(C)(ii)—Waive.
Chapter 75, subchapter II, section 7512—Adverse Actions. Waive to
replace ‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band’’, provide that adverse action provisions do not apply to conversion from General Schedule special
rates to demonstration project pay, as long as total pay is not reduced; and exclude from coverage (procedural and appeal rights) reductions in pay band with no reduction in pay, when such actions result from regression of pay into a lower pay band through reductions
or denials of general increase (‘‘slippage’’). This exclusion will not
apply to employees with veterans’ preference.
Part 531, subpart D—Within Grade Increases. Waive in entirety.
Part 531, subpart E—Quality Step Increases. Waive in entirety.
Part 531, subpart F—Locality-Based Comparability Payments. Waive to
the extent necessary to allow the demonstration project employees
to be treated as GS employees, employees in Pay Band V of the
S&E Professional Career to be treated as ST employees, and basic
rates of pay under the demonstration project to be treated as scheduled annual rates of pay.
Part 536—Grade and Pay Retention. Waive in entirety.
Part 550, subpart G—Severance Pay.
Waive to the extent necessary to allow ONR to define reasonable offer.
Part 550, subpart I—Pay for Duty Involving Physical Hardship or Hazard. Waive to the extent necessary to allow demonstration project
employees to be treated as GS employees. This waiver does not
apply to employees in Pay Band V of the S&E Professional Career
Track.
Part 575, subparts A, B, C, and D—Recruitment and Relocation Bonuses, Retention Allowances, and Supervisory Differential, Waive to
the extent necessary to allow (1) employees and positions under the
demonstration project to be treated as employees and positions
under the GS and (2) employees in Level V of the S&E Professional
career track to be treated as ST employees for these purposes.
Part 591, subpart B—Cost-of-living Allowances and Post Differential—
non-foreign areas. Waive to the extent necessary to allow demonstration project employees to be treated as GS employees and
employees in Pay Band V of the S&E Professional Career Track to
be treated as ST employees.
Part 752, sections 752.101, 752.201, 752.301 and 752.401: Principal
statutory requirements and Coverage. Waived to the extent necessary to allow for up to a three-year probationary period and to permit termination during the extended probationary period without
using adverse action procedures for those employees serving a probationary period under an initial appointment except for those with
veterans’ preference.
Part 752, subpart A—Adverse Actions. Waive to exclude from coverage (procedural and appeal rights) reductions in pay band with no
reduction in pay, when such actions result from regression of pay
into a lower pay band through reductions and denials of general increase (‘‘slippage’’). This exclusion will not apply to employees with
veterans’ preference.
Part 752, section 752.401(a)(3)—Adverse Actions. Waive to replace
‘‘grade’’ with ‘‘pay band’’.
Part 752, section 752.401(a)(4)—Adverse Actions. Waive to provide
that adverse action provisions do not apply to conversion from General Schedule special rates to demonstration project pay, as long as
total pay is not reduced.
Appendix C: Definitions of Career
Tracks and Pay Bands
their application in classification actions and
performance appraisal.
ONR’s career level definitions may be
modified as experience is gained through
Career Track: S&E Professional—Includes professional positions in S&E occupations such as physics, electronics engineering, chemistry,
and student positions associated with these professions.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Level I ..............
Level II .............
Level III ............
VerDate Mar<15>2010
This includes student trainees. The education and employment must be part of a formal student employment program.
Specific, clear, and detailed instructions and supervision are given to complement education. The level of education
and experience completed is a major consideration in establishing the level of on-the-job training and work assignments.
This is the entry or developmental stage, preparing S&E’s for the full and independent performance of their work. S&E’s
at this level perform supporting work in science or engineering requiring professional training but little experience,
and conduct activities with objectives and priorities identified by supervisor or team leader. Assistance is given on
new or unusual projects; completed work is reviewed for technical soundness.
This is the advanced developmental pay band of this career track. S&Es at this level conceive and define solutions to
technical problems of moderate complexity; plan, analyze, interpret, and report findings of projects; and guide technical and programmatic work of a program’s research efforts. Completed work and reports are reviewed to evaluate
overall results.
19:21 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Level IV ............
Level V .............
30225
S&E’s at this level are authorities within their professional areas or key program administrators. They direct technical activities or assist higher levels on challenging and innovative projects or technical program development with only general guidance on policy, resources and planning; develop solutions to complex problems requiring various disciplines;
responsible for fulfilling program objectives.
S&Es at this level are renowned experts in their fields. They independently define and lead most challenging technical
programs consistent with general guidance and/or independently direct overall R&D program managerial and/or supervisory aspects; conceive and develop elegant solutions to very difficult problems requiring highly specialized areas of
technical expertise; are recognized within DoD and other agencies for broad technical area expertise and have established professional reputation in technical community nationally and internationally. The primary requirement for
Level V positions is the knowledge of and expertise in specific scientific and technology areas related to the mission
of their organization. However, the ability to manage and/or supervise R&D operations or programs is also considered
a necessity. They may direct the work of an organizational unit; may be held accountable for the success of one or
more specific programs or projects; monitor progress toward organizational goals and periodically evaluate and make
appropriate adjustments to such goals; supervise the work of employees; or otherwise exercise important policy-making, policy-determining, or other managerial functions.
Career Track: Administrative Specialist and Professional—Professional and specialist positions in areas such as the following: safety and
health, personnel, finance, budget, procurement, librarianship, legal, business, facilities management and student positions associated
with these professions.
Level I ..............
Level II .............
Level III ............
Level IV ............
Level V .............
Includes student trainees. The education and employment must be part of a formal student employment program. Specific, clear, and detailed instructions and supervision are given to complement education. The level of education and
experience completed is a major consideration in establishing the level of on-the-job training and work assignments.
This is the developmental stage preparing Administrative Specialists and Professionals for the full and independent performance of their work. Specific, clear and detailed instruction and supervision are given upon entry; recurring assignments are carried out independently. Situations not covered by instructions are referred to supervisor. Finished work
is reviewed to ensure accuracy.
This is the advanced developmental career level of this career track. Employees at this level plan and carry out assignments independently, resolve conflicts that arise, coordinate work with others and interpret policy on own initiative.
Completed work is reviewed for feasibility, compatibility with other work or effectiveness in meeting requirements or
expected results.
At this level, Administrative Specialists and Professionals are authorities within their professional areas or key program
administrators or supervisors. They conduct or direct activities in an administrative and professional area with only
general guidance on policy, resources and planning; develop solutions to complex problems requiring various disciplines; and are responsible for fulfilling program objectives.
Administrative Specialists and Professionals at this level are experts within their broad administrative area or professional field who serve as leaders, heads of branches or divisions, or key program administrators. They receive general
guidance on policy, resources and planning that have an effect on public policies or programs; and are responsible for
fulfilling program objectives. Results are authoritative and affect administrative programs or the well-being of substantial numbers of people.
Career Track: Administrative Support—Includes clerical, secretarial and assistant work in nonscientific and engineering occupations.
Level I ..............
Level II .............
Level III ............
This includes student trainees as well as advanced entry level which requires a fundamental knowledge of a clerical or
administrative field. Developmental assignments may be given which lead to duties at a higher group level. Performs
repetitive tasks, specific, clear and detailed instruction and supervision; with more experience utilizes knowledge of
standardized procedures and operations, assistance is given on new or unusual projects. Completed work is reviewed
for technical soundness.
This level requires knowledge of standardized rules, procedures or operations requiring considerable training. General
guidance is received on overall objectives and resources. Completed assignments may be reviewed for overall soundness or meeting expected results.
This is the senior level which requires expert knowledge of procedures and operations, which is gained through extensive training. Employees at this level receive general guidance on overall resources and objectives, and are skilled in
applying knowledge of basic principles, concepts, and methodology of profession or administrative occupation and
technical methods. Results are accepted as authoritative and are normally accepted without significant change.
Appendix D: Table of Occupational
Series Within Career Tracks
Definitions for ONR’s three career tracks
are provided below along with the
breakdown of their respective series. Some
series may appear in two career tracks
depending on the purpose of the position.
The breakdown of occupational series
reflects only those occupations that currently
exist in ONR. Additional series may be added
as a result of changes in mission
requirements or OPM-recognized
occupations. These additional series will be
placed in the appropriate career track
consistent with the definitions provided
below.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
S&E Professional Career Track: Includes professional positions in S&E occupations such as physics, electronics, engineering, chemistry,
and student positions associated with these professions.
0180—Psychology Series.
0190—General Anthropology Series.
0335—Computer Clerk & Assistant.
0401—General Natural Resources Management
Sciences Series.
0403—Microbiology Series.
0405—Pharmacology Series.
0413—Physiology Series.
0440—Genetics Series.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
and
Biological
0855—Electronics Engineering Series.
0861—Aerospace Engineering Series.
0871—Naval Architecture Series.
0854—Computer Engineering Series.
0893—Chemical Engineering Series.
0896—Industrial Engineering Series.
1301—General Physical Sciences Series.
1310—Physics Series.
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30226
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
0601—General Health Science Series.
0602—Medical Officer Series.
0801—General Engineering Series.
0802—Engineering Technical Series.
0806—Materials Engineering Series.
0810—Civil Engineering Series.
0830—Mechanical Engineering Series.
0840—Nuclear Engineering Series.
0850—Electrical Engineering Series.
1313—Geophysics Series.
1320—Chemistry Series.
1321—Metallurgy Series.
1340—Meteorology Series.
1360—Oceanography Series.
1515—Operations Research Series.
1520—Mathematics Series.
1530—Statistics Series.
1550—Computer Science Series.
Administrative Specialist and Professional Career Track: Professional and specialist positions in areas such as the following: Safety and
health, finance, budget, procurement, librarianship, legal, business, facilities management, and student positions associated with these
professions.
0080—Security Administration Series.
0110—Economist Series.
0201—Human Resource Management Series.
0260—Equal Employment Opportunity Series.
0301—Miscellaneous Administration and Program Series.
0340—Program Management Series.
0341—Administrative Officer Series.
0343—Management and Program Analysis Series.
0391—Telecommunications Series.
0501—Financial Administration and Program Series.
0505—Financial Management Series.
0510—Accounting Series.
0560—Budget Analysis Series.
0905—General Attorney Series.
0950—Paralegal Specialist Series.
1035—Public Affairs Series.
1084—Visual Information Series.
1101—General Business and Industry Series.
1102—Contracting Series.
1150—Industrial Specialist Series.
1222—Patent Attorney Series.
1412—Technical Information Services Series.
1720—Education Specialist Series.
1801—General Inspection, Investigation, and Compliance Series.
2210—Information Technology Management.
Administrative Support: Includes clerical, secretarial, and assistant work in nonscientific and engineering occupations.
0086—Security Clerical and Assistance Series.
0203—Human Resource Assistance Series.
0303—Miscellaneous Clerk and Assistant Series.
0305—Mail and File Series.
0318—Secretary Series.
0326—Office Automation and Clerical Assistance Series.
Appendix E: Classification and CCS
Elements
The CCS Summaries shown in this
appendix are draft templates intended to
provide an understanding of the information
0335—Computer Clerk and Assistant Series.
0503—Financial Clerical and Assistance Series.
0525—Accounting Technician Series.
0561—Budget Clerical and Assistance Series.
0986—Legal Assistance Series.
covered by the CCS process. Under the
demonstration project, the summaries will be
generated by the CCSDS. They may be
changed during the project to require
additional information, to make them easier
to use, or for other reasons.
The contents of the CCS elements,
descriptors, discriminators, and basic
acceptable standards may similarly be
changed during the life of the demonstration
project.
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION-BASED COMPENSATION SYSTEM (CCS) SUMMARY
[Science & Engineering Professional]
Employee Name:
Click here to enter text.
Pay Pool Code:
Click here to enter text.
Appraisal Period Ending:
Click here to enter text.
Title:
Click here to enter text.
Pay Plan/Series:
Click here to enter text.
Career Level:
Click here to enter text.
SSN: Click here to enter text
Supervisor: Click here to enter text
Most Recent OCS: Click here to enter text.
Present Salary: Click here to enter text.
Scores within NPR Equivalent to Present
Salary: Click here to enter text.
Critical Elements
* Weight
Score
Net Score
Rating of Record Acceptable or Unacceptable
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
1. Scientific and Technical Leadership
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
2. Program Execution
and Liaison
3. Cooperation and Supervision
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
* If zero, then element not applicable.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:21 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30227
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Basic Pay Increase %: Click here to enter text.
Contribution Award $: Click here to enter
text.
Hours Click here to enter text.
Summary Rating A (Acceptable) or U
Signatures and Date
(Unacceptable)
Must be U if any critical element is rated U
Click here to enter text.
Overall Contribution Score (Weighted
Average): Click here to enter text.
CCS Plan
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA (OPTIONAL).
FOR EXAMPLE, SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES,
STANDARDS, TASKINGS, AND/OR
EXAMPLES:
REMARKS:
Interim Review
Appraisal
Employee
Supervisor
NOTE: Employee’s signature under ‘‘CCS Plan’’ signifies that he or she has been given a copy of this summary and has a copy of Elements,
Descriptors, Discriminators, and Standards applicable to his or her career track.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.012
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.013
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30228
30229
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION-BASED COMPENSATION SYSTEM (CCS) SUMMARY
[Administrative Specialist and Professional]
Pay Pool Code:
Click here to enter text.
Appraisal Period Ending:
Click here to enter text.
Title:
Click here to enter text.
Pay Plan/Series:
Click here to enter text.
Career Level:
Click here to enter text.
SSN: Click here to enter text.
Supervisor: Click here to enter text.
Most Recent OCS: Click here to enter text.
Present Salary: Click here to enter text.
Scores within NPR Equivalent to Present
Salary: Click here to enter text.
Critical elements
1. Problem Solving and
Leadership
VerDate Mar<15>2010
* Weight
Click here to enter text.
19:21 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Score
Click here to enter text.
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Net score
Click here to enter text.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Rating of record acceptable or unacceptable
Click here to enter text.
EN28MY10.014
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Employee Name:
Click here to enter text.
30230
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Critical elements
* Weight
Score
Net score
Rating of record acceptable or unacceptable
2. Cooperation and Customer Relations
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
3. Supervision and Resources Management
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
* If zero, then element not applicable.
Basic Pay Increase %: Click here to enter text.
Contribution Award $: Click here to enter
text.
Hours: Click here to enter text.
Summary Rating A (Acceptable) or U
Signatures and date
(Unacceptable)
Must be U if any critical element is rated U
Click here to enter text.
Overall Contribution Score (Weighted
Average): Click here to enter text.
CCS plan
SUPLEMENTAL CRITERIA (OPTIONAL).
FOR EXAMPLE, SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES,
STANDARDS, TASKINGS, AND/OR
EXAMPLES:
REMARKS:
Interim review
Appraisal
Employee
Supervisor
Note: Employee’s signature under ‘‘CCS Plan’’ signifies that he or she has been given a copy of this summary and has a copy of Elements,
Descriptors, Discriminators, and Standards applicable to his or her career track.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30231
EN28MY10.015
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.016
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30232
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
30233
OFFICE OF NAVAL RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION-BASED COMPENSATION SYSTEM (CCS) SUMMARY
[Administrative Support]
Pay Pool Code:
Click here to enter text.
Appraisal Period Ending:
Click here to enter text.
Title:
Click here to enter text.
Pay Plan/Series:
Click here to enter text.
Career Level:
Click here to enter text.
SSN; Click here to enter text.
Supervisor: Click here to enter text.
Most Recent OCS: Click here to enter text.
Present Salary: Click here to enter text.
Scores within NPR Equivalent to Present
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
Salary: Click here to enter text.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.017
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Employee Name:
Click here to enter text.
30234
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Critical Elements
1. Problem Solving
2. Cooperation/Customer
Relations/Supervision
* Weight
Score
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Net Score
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
Rating of Record
Acceptable or Unacceptable
Click here to enter text.
Click here to enter text.
* If zero, then element not applicable.
Basic Pay Increase %: Click here to enter text.
Contribution Award $: Click here to enter
text.
Hours: Click here to enter text.
Summary Rating A (Acceptable) or U
Signatures and Date
(Unacceptable)
Must be U if any critical element is rated U
Click here to enter text.
Overall Contribution Score (Weighted
Average):
Click here to enter text.
CCS Plan
SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA (OPTIONAL).
FOR EXAMPLE, SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES,
STANDARDS, TASKINGS, AND/OR
EXAMPLES:
REMARKS:
Interim Review
Appraisal
Employee
Supervisor
NOTE: Employee’s signature under ‘‘CCS Plan’’ signifies that he or she has been given a copy of this summary and has a copy of Elements,
Descriptors, Discriminators, and Standards applicable to his or her career track.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
30235
EN28MY10.018
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
Appendix F: Computation of the IPS
and the NPR
The ONR demonstration project will use an
IPS which links basic pay to contribution
scores determined by the CCS process. The
area where basic pay and level of
contribution are assumed to be properly
related is called the NPR. An employee
whose CCS score and rate of basic pay plot
within the NPR is considered to be
contributing at a level consistent with pay.
Employees whose pay plots below the NPR
for their assessed score are considered
‘‘undercompensated’’ while employees whose
score and pay plot above the NPR are
considered ‘‘overcompensated.’’
The purpose of this scoring and pay
structure is to spread the full range of basic
pay provided by the GS, between GS–1, step
1, and GS–15, step 10, into 80 intervals
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
(scores and pay above those points are
related using the same parameters). Each
interval is a fixed percentage of the pay
associated with the previous point.
For each possible contribution score
available to employees, the NPR spans a
basic pay range of 12 percent. The lower
boundary (or ‘‘rail’’) is established by fixing
the basic pay equivalent to GS–1, step 1, with
a CCS score of zero. The upper boundary is
fixed at the basic pay equivalent to GS–15,
step 10, with a CCS score of 80. The distance
between these upper and lower rails for a
given overall contribution score is then
computed to ensure the range of 12 percent
of basic pay is maintained for each available
CCS score. The middle rail of the NPR is
computed as 6 percent above the lower rail.
This point is used in connection with certain
limits established for pay increases (see
section IV.C.7).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
From the above considerations, five
variables, or inputs, were identified. They are
as follows:
1. Variable A: GS–1, step 1 (lowest salary).
2. Variable B: GS–15, step 10 (highest
salary).
3. Variable C: Current C-values.
4. Variable M: 6 percent (middle rail
computation above the low rail).
5. Variable H: 12 percent (high rail
computation above low rail).
Other variables are as follows:
1. Variable N: Number of C-value steps at
GS–15, step 10.
2. Variable P (step increase): Salary value
for each C-value equal to 1 + percentage
increase.
From these variables, the following
formula definitions were developed:
Low rail = A*(P∧C)
Mid rail = (1+M)*A*(P∧C)
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.019
30236
30237
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
High rail = (1+H)*A*(P∧C)
Where P = (B/(A*(1+H)))∧(1/N)
As an example, a result of the above
computation, using the 2010 GS Salary Table,
P (step increase) equals 1.023664623.
Attachment (1) is a complete list of CCS pay
band scores and basic pay ranges.
Attachment (2) contains graphic
representations of these tables for each career
track. Once the C-values (0–80) are
determined, the CCS pay bands and scores
are extended at the same percentage
increments as were computed for the step
SALARY RANGES ASSOCIATED WITH EACH
[GS 1–Step 1: 17,803
Hi%: 12.00%
#C–values: 80
C–value
Low Rail
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
0 ...................................
1 ...................................
2 ...................................
3 ...................................
4 ...................................
5 ...................................
6 ...................................
7 ...................................
8 ...................................
9 ...................................
10 .................................
11 .................................
12 .................................
13 .................................
14 .................................
15 .................................
16 .................................
17 .................................
18 .................................
19 .................................
20 .................................
21 .................................
22 .................................
23 .................................
24 .................................
25 .................................
26 .................................
27 .................................
28 .................................
29 .................................
30 .................................
31 .................................
32 .................................
33 .................................
34 .................................
35 .................................
36 .................................
37 .................................
38 .................................
39 .................................
40 .................................
41 .................................
42 .................................
43 .................................
44 .................................
45 .................................
46 .................................
47 .................................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Mid Rail
17803
18224
18656
19097
19549
20012
20485
20970
21466
21974
22494
23026
23571
24129
24700
25285
25883
26496
27123
27764
28422
29094
29783
30487
31209
31947
32703
33477
34270
35081
35911
36761
37630
38521
39433
40366
41321
42299
43300
44324
45373
46447
47546
48671
49823
51002
52209
53445
Jkt 220001
18871
19318
19775
20243
20722
21212
21714
22228
22754
23293
23844
24408
24986
25577
26182
26802
27436
28085
28750
29430
30127
30840
31570
32317
33081
33864
34666
35486
36326
37185
38065
38966
39888
40832
41798
42788
43800
44837
45898
46984
48096
49234
50399
51592
52813
54062
55342
56651
PO 00000
Frm 00041
High Rail
C–VALUE USING 2010 INPUTS
GS 15–Step 10: 129,517
C–value
19939
20411
20894
21389
21895
22413
22943
23486
24042
24611
25193
25790
26400
27025
27664
28319
28989
29675
30377
31096
31832
32585
33357
34146
34954
35781
36628
37495
38382
39290
40220
41172
42146
43143
44164
45210
46279
47375
48496
49643
50818
52021
53252
54512
55802
57123
58474
59858
Fmt 4701
increase above. These C-values are extended
to encompass the equivalent of EX–IV
effective January 2010. In the example, EX–
IV is equal to basic pay of $155,500 and is
encompassed by the C-value 89 ($142,734 to
$159,862).
Sfmt 4703
Mid%: 6.00%]
Low Rail
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
54709
56004
57329
58686
60075
61497
62952
64442
65967
67528
69126
70762
72436
74150
75905
77701
79540
81422
83349
85322
87341
89408
91523
93689
95906
98176
100499
102877
105312
107804
110355
112967
115640
118377
121178
124046
126981
129986
133062
136211
139435
142734
146112
149570
153109
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Mid Rail
57992
59364
60769
62207
63679
65186
66729
68308
69925
71579
73273
75007
76782
78599
80459
82363
84312
86308
88350
90441
92581
94772
97015
99311
101661
104066
106529
109050
111631
114272
116977
119745
122579
125479
128449
131488
134600
137785
141046
144384
147801
151298
154879
158544
162296
High Rail
61275
62725
64209
65728
67284
68876
70506
72175
73883
75631
77421
79253
81128
83048
85014
87025
89085
91193
93351
95560
97822
100136
102506
104932
107415
109957
112559
115223
117949
120741
123598
126523
129517
132582
135719
138931
142219
145585
149030
152556
156167
159862
163645
167518
171482
EN28MY10.021
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
EN28MY10.020
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
30238
30239
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Appendix G: Intervention Model
Intervention
Expected effects
1. COMPENSATION
a. Pay banding ...............................
Measures
Data sources
Increased organizational flexibility
Reduced administrative workload,
paper work reduction.
Advanced in-hire rates .................
Perceived flexibility .......................
Actual/perceived time savings ......
Attitude survey.
Personnel office data, PME results, attitude survey.
Workforce data.
Slower pay progression at entry
levels.
Increased pay potential ................
Increased satisfaction with advancement.
Increased pay satisfaction ............
Improved recruitment ....................
b. Conversion buy-in ......................
Employee acceptance ..................
c. Pay differentials/adjustments .....
Increased incentive to accept supervisory/team leader positions.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
a. Cash awards/bonuses ...............
Starting salaries of banded v.
non-banded employees.
Progression of new hires over
time by band, career path.
Mean salaries by band, group,
demographics.
Total payroll costs ........................
Employee perceptions of advancement.
Pay satisfaction, internal/external
equity.
Offer/acceptance ratios; Percent
declinations.
Employee perceptions of equity,
fairness.
Cost as a percent of payroll .........
Perceived motivational power ......
Workforce data.
Workforce data.
Personnel office data.
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
Personnel office data.
Attitude survey.
Workforce data.
Attitude survey.
2.
Perceived motivational power ......
Amount and number of awards by
group, demographics.
Perceived fairness of awards .......
Satisfaction with monetary awards
Perceived pay-performance link ...
Attitude survey.
Workforce data.
Perceived fairness of ratings ........
Satisfaction with ratings ................
Employee trust in supervisors ......
Adequacy of performance feedback.
Turnover by performance rating
scores.
Attitude
Attitude
Attitude
Attitude
Pay progression by performance
scores, career path.
Linkage of performance objectives
to strategic plans/goals.
Workforce data.
Perceived involvement .................
Attitude survey/focus groups.
Performance management ...........
Employee and supervisor perceptions of revised procedures.
Perceived fairness of process ......
Feedback and coaching procedures used.
Time, funds spent on training by
demographics.
Perceived workforce quality .........
Personnel regulations.
Attitude survey.
Reduction in amount of time and
paperwork spent on classification.
Time spent on classification procedures.
Personnel office data.
Reduction of paperwork/number
of personnel actions (classification/promotion).
Managers’ perceptions of time
savings, ease of use.
Perceived authority .......................
Personnel office data.
Ease of use ..................................
b. Performance based pay progression.
Reward/motivate performance .....
To support fair and appropriate
distribution of awards.
Number of classification disputes/
appeals pre/post.
Personnel records.
Increased pay-performance link ...
Improved performance feedback ..
Decreased turnover of high performers/Increased turnover of
low performers.
Differential pay progression of
high/low performers.
Alignment of organizational and
individual performance objectives and results.
Increased employee involvement
in performance planning and
assessment.
c. New appraisal process ..............
Reduced administrative burden ....
d. Performance development .........
Improved communication .............
Better communication of performance expectations.
Improved satisfaction and quality
of workforce.
‘‘WHITE COLLAR’’ CLASSIFICATION
a. Improved classification systems
with generic standards.
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
survey.
survey.
survey.
survey.
Workforce data.
Performance objectives, strategic
plans.
Focus groups.
Focus groups.
Personnel office data.
Training records.
Attitude survey.
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
3.
b.
Classification authority
gated to managers.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
dele-
18:14 May 27, 2010
Increased supervisory authority/
accountability.
Decreased conflict between management and personnel staff.
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
28MYN2
30240
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Intervention
Expected effects
Measures
Data sources
Improved quality of supervisory
staff.
Attitude survey.
Assignment flexibility ....................
Focus groups, surveys.
Perceived internal mobility ...........
Perceived pay equity ....................
Supervisory/non-supervisory
ratios.
Employee perceptions of quality
or supervisory.
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
Workforce data.
Attitude survey.
Attitude survey.
Separated employees by demographics, performance scores.
Satisfaction with RIF Process ......
Cost comparison of traditional vs.
Modified RIF.
Time to conduct RIF—personnel
office data.
Number of Appeals/reinstatements.
Workforce data, Attitude survey/
focus group.
Attitude survey/focus group.
Personnel office/budget data.
Perceived flexibility in authority to
hire.
Offer/accept ratios ........................
Attitude survey.
Percent declinations .....................
Timeliness of job offers ................
GPAs of new hires, educational
levels.
Actual/perceived skills ..................
Personnel office data.
Personnel office data.
Personnel office data.
Number/percentage of conversions from modified term to permanent appointments.
Average conversion period to permanent status.
Number/percentage of employees
completing probationary period.
Number of separations during
probationary period.
Workforce data.
Personnel office data.
Number and type of opportunities
taken.
Employee and supervisor perceptions.
Number and type of training .........
Workforce data.
Placement of employees, skills
imbalances corrected.
Employee and supervisor perceptions.
Application of knowledge gained
from training.
c. Dual career ladder .....................
No negative impact on internal
pay equity.
Increased flexibility to assign employees.
Improved internal mobility ............
Increased pay equity ....................
Flatter organization .......................
Management satisfaction with
service provided by personnel
office.
Internal pay equity ........................
Personnel office data
Combination of personnel measures.
Employee/Management job satisfaction (intrinsic/extrinsic).
Planning procedures .....................
Perceived effectiveness of planning procedures.
Actual/perceived coordination ......
All data sources.
Customer satisfaction ...................
Project training/development costs
(staff salaries, contract cost,
training hours per employee).
Customer satisfaction surveys.
Demo project office records.
Contract documents.
HR servicing ratios .......................
Personnel office data, workforce
data.
Attitude survey.
4. Modified RIF
Minimize loss of high performing
employees with needed skills.
Contain cost and disruption ..........
5. Hiring Authority
a. Delegated Examining ................
Improved ease and timeliness of
hiring process.
Improved recruitment of employees in shortage categories.
b. Term Appointment Authority ......
Reduced administrative workload/
paperwork reduction.
Increased capability to expand
and contract workforce.
c. Flexible Probationary Period ......
Expanded employee assessment
6. Expanded Development Opportunities
a. Sabbaticals ................................
b. Critical Skills Training ................
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
7. Combination of All Interventions
All ...................................................
Expanded range of professional
growth and development.
Application of enhanced knowledge and skills to work product.
Improved organizational effectiveness.
Improved organizational effectiveness.
Improved management of workforce.
Improved planning ........................
Improved cross functional coordination.
Increased product success ...........
Cost of innovation .........................
8. Context:
Regionalization ..............................
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Reduced servicing ratios/costs .....
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
Personnel office data.
Personnel office data.
Personnel office data.
Attitude survey.
Workforce data.
Personnel office data.
Workforce data.
Personnel office data.
Workforce data.
Personnel office data.
Attitude survey.
Personnel office data
Attitude survey
Attitude survey/focus group.
Attitude survey.
Strategic planning documents.
Attitude survey.
Organizational charts.
28MYN2
30241
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 / Notices
Intervention
Expected effects
Measures
No negative impact on service
quality.
Data sources
Average cost per employee
served.
Service quality, timeliness ............
Personnel office data, workforce
data.
Attitude survey/focus groups.
[FR Doc. 2010–12690 Filed 5–27–10; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES2
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 May 27, 2010
Jkt 220001
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\28MYN2.SGM
28MYN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 103 (Friday, May 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30198-30241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12690]
[[Page 30197]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel Management
Demonstration Project, Department of Navy (DON), Office of Naval
Research (ONR); Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 75 , No. 103 / Friday, May 28, 2010 /
Notices
[[Page 30198]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratory Personnel
Management Demonstration Project, Department of Navy (DON), Office of
Naval Research (ONR)
AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Civilian
Personnel Policy) (DUSD (CPP)), (DoD)
ACTION: Notice of proposal to adopt a demonstration project plan and
additional flexibilities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Naval Research (ONR) proposes to adopt the Naval
Research Laboratory (NRL) Personnel Management Demonstration Project
with modifications and one flexibility from the U.S. Army Aviation and
Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC). The
majority of flexibilities and administrative procedures are expected to
be adopted without changes. However, modifications are made when
necessary to address ONR's specific organizational, workforce, and
approval needs; technical modifications to conform to changes in the
law and governing Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations,
which are not being waived, that were effected after the publication of
the NRL personnel demonstration project plan; and changes in response
to comments received during the 30-day comment period.
DATES: ONR's adoption proposal may not be implemented until a 30-day
comment period is provided, comments addressed, and a final Federal
Register notice published. To be considered, written comments must be
submitted on or before June 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on or before the comment due date by mail to
Ms. Betty A. Duffield, CPMS-PSSC, Suite B-200, 1400 Key Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22209-5144; by fax to (703) 696-5462; or by e-mail to
Betty.Duffield@cpms.osd.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Naval Research: Ms. Margaret
J. Mitchell, Director, Human Resources Office, Office of Naval
Research, 875 North Randolph Street, Code 01HR, Arlington, VA 22203;
Margaret.J.Mitchell@navy.mil.
DoD: Ms. Betty A. Duffield, CPMS-PSSC, Suite B-200, 1400 Key
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22209-5144.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 342(b) of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 1995, Public Law 103-337,
as amended (10 U.S.C. 2358 note) by section 1109 of NDAA FY 2000,
Public Law 106-65, and section 1114 of NDAA FY 2001, Public Law 106-
398, authorizes the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) to conduct personnel
management demonstration projects at DoD laboratories designated as
Science and Technology Reinvention Laboratories (STRLs). Section 1107
of NDAA FY 2008, Public Law 110-181, as amended by section 1109 of NDAA
FY 2009, Public Law 110-417, requires the SECDEF to execute a process
and plan to employ the personnel management demonstration project
authorities granted to the Office of Personnel Management under title 5
United States Code (U.S.C.) section 4703 at the STRLs previously
enumerated in 5 U.S.C. 9902(c)(2), and now redesignated in section 1105
of NDAA FY 2010, Public Law 111-84, 123 Stat. 2486, and 73 FR 73248, to
enhance the performance of the missions of the laboratories. Section
1107 of Public Law 110-181 further authorizes in subsection 1107(c)
that any flexibility available to any demonstration laboratory shall be
available for use at any other laboratory as previously enumerated in
title 5 U.S.C. 9902(c)(2). The Office of Naval Research (ONR) is listed
as one of the previously designated 5 U.S.C. 9902(c)(2) STRLs.
1. Background
Since 1966, many studies of Department of Defense (DoD)
laboratories have been conducted on laboratory quality and personnel.
Almost all of these studies have recommended improvements in the
civilian personnel policy, organization, and management. Pursuant to
the authority provided in section 342(b) of Public Law 103-337, as
amended, a number of DoD STRL personnel demonstration projects were
approved. These projects are ``generally similar in nature'' to the
Department of Navy's ``China Lake'' Personnel Demonstration Project.
The terminology, ``generally similar in nature,'' does not imply an
emulation of various features, but rather implies a similar opportunity
and authority to develop personnel flexibilities that significantly
increase the decision authority of laboratory department heads and/or
directors.
This demonstration project involves: (1) Streamlined delegated
examining; (2) noncitizen hiring; (3) expanded detail authority; (4)
extended probationary period for newly hired employees; (5) expanded
temporary promotion; (6) voluntary emeritus program; (7) paybanding;
(8) contribution-based compensation system; (9) performance-based
reduction-in-pay or removal actions; and (10) reduction-in-force (RIF)
procedures.
2. Overview
DoD published notice in 73 FR 73248, December 2, 2008, that
pursuant to subsection 1107(c) of Public Law 110-181, the three STRLs
listed in 73 FR 73248 not having personnel demonstration projects at
that time may adopt the flexibilities of the other laboratories
previously listed in subsection 9902(c)(2) and now redesignated in
section 1105 of Public Law 111-84. ONR is one of the three STRLs
specified in this provision.
Accordingly, ONR intends to build its demonstration project using
flexibilities adopted from existing STRL demonstration projects
(specifically NRL and AMRDEC). Final plans for the NRL and AMRDEC
personnel management demonstration projects were published in the
Federal Register as follows:
Department of the Navy: NRL--64 FR 33970, June 24, 1999.
No amendments have been published; and
Department of the Army: AMRDEC--62 FR 34876 and 62 FR
34906, June 27, 1997; and amendments and/or corrections to final plans
published--64 FR 11074, March 8, 1999; 64 FR 12216, March 11, 1999; 65
FR 53142, August 31, 2000; and 67 FR 5716, February 6, 2002.
3. Access to Flexibilities of Other STRLs
Flexibilities published in this Federal Register notice shall be
available for use by the STRLs previously enumerated in 5 U.S.C.
9902(c)(2), now redesignated in section 1105 of Public Law 111-84, if
they wish to adopt them in accordance with DoD Instruction 1400.37; 73
FR 73248 to 73252; and after the fulfilling of any collective
bargaining obligations.
Dated: May 21, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
B. Problems with the Current System
C. Waivers Required
D. Expected Benefits
E. Participating Organizations and Employees
F. Project Design
III. Accessions and Internal Placements
A. Hiring Authority
1. Background
2. Delegated Examining
B. Legal Authority
[[Page 30199]]
C. Determining Employee and Applicant Qualifications
D. Noncitizen Hiring
E. Expanded Detail Authority
F. Extended Probationary Period
G. Definitions
1. Basic Pay
2. Maintained Pay
3. Promotion
4. Reassignment
5. Change to Lower Pay Band
6. Pay Adjustment
7. Detail
8. Highest Previous Rate
9. Approving Manager
H. Pay Setting Determinations Outside the CCS
1. External New Hires
2. Internal Actions
a. Promotion.
b. Pay Adjustment (Voluntary Change to Lower Pay) or Change to
Lower Pay Band (except RIF).
c. Pay Adjustment (Involuntary Change to Lower Pay) or Change to
Lower Pay Band Due to Adverse or Performance-based Action.
d. Involuntary Change to Lower Pay Band or Reassignment to a
Career Track with a Lower Salary Range, Other than Adverse or
Performance-based.
e. RIF Action (including employees who are offered and accept a
vacancy at a lower pay band or in a different career track).
f. Upward Mobility or Other Formal Training Program Selection.
g. Return to Limited or Light Duty from a Disability as a Result
of Occupational Injury to a Position in a Lower Pay Band or to a
Career Track with Lower Basic Pay Potential than Held Prior to the
Injury.
h. Restoration to Duty.
i. Reassignment.
j. Student Educational Employment Program.
k. Hazard Pay or Pay for Duty Involving Physical Hardship.
I. Priority Placement Program (PPP)
J. Expanded Temporary Promotion
K. Voluntary Emeritus Program
IV. Sustainment
A. Position Classification
1. Career Tracks and Pay Bands
a. Target Pay Band.
b. Occupational Series and Position Titling.
c. Classification Standards.
d. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
(1) Guidelines for FLSA Determinations.
(2) Nonsupervisory and Leader Positions.
(3) Supervisory Positions.
2. Requirements Document (RD)
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
a. Delegated Authority.
b. Position Classification Accountability.
B. Integrated Pay Schedule
1. Annual Pay Action
2. Overtime Pay
3. Classification Appeals
4. Above GS-15 Positions
5. Distinguished Contributions Allowance (DCA)
a. Eligibility.
b. Nomination.
c. Reduction or Termination of a DCA.
d. Lump-Sum DCA Payments.
e. DCA Budget Allocation.
f. Concurrent Monetary Payments.
C. Contribution-Based Compensation System (CCS)
1. General
2. CCS Process
3. Pay Pool Annual Planning
a. Element Weights and Applicability.
b. Supplemental Criteria.
4. Annual CCS Appraisal Process (See Figure 7.)
5. Exceptions
6. Normal Pay Range (NPR)--Basic Pay Versus Contribution
7. Compensation
a. General Increases.
b. Merit Increases.
c. Locality Increases.
d. Contribution Awards.
8. Career Movement Based on CCS
a. Advancements in Level Which May be Approved by the Pay Pool
Manager.
b. Advancements in Level Which Must be Approved by the Chief of
Naval Research (CNR).
c. Advancement to Level V of the Science and Engineering (S&E)
Professional Career Track.
9. CCS Grievance Procedures
V. Separations
A. Performance-based Reduction-in-Pay or Removal Actions
B. Reduction-in-Force (RIF) Procedures
1. RIF Authority
2. RIF Definitions
a. Competition in RIF.
b. Competitive Area.
c. Competitive Level.
d. Service Computation Date (SCD).
(1). Federal SCD.
(2) CCS Process Results.
(3). Credit from Other Rating Systems.
(4) RIF Cutoff Date.
3. Displacement Rights
a. Displacement Process
b. Retention Standing
c. Vacant Positions
d. Ineligible for Displacement Rights
e. Change to Lower Level due to an Adverse or Performance-based
Action
4. Notice Period
5. RIF Appeals
6. Separation Incentives
7. Severance Pay
8. Outplacement Assistance
VI. Demonstration Project Transition
A.Initial Conversion or Movement to the Demonstration Project
1. Placement into Career Tracks and Pay Bands
2.Conversion of retained grade and pay employees
3. WGI Buy-In
4. Career Promotion Eligibility
5. Conversion of Special Salary Rate Employees
6. Conversion of Employees on Temporary Promotions
7. Non-competitive Movement into the Demonstration Project
B. CCS Start-Up
C. Training
1. Types of Training
a. Employees.
b. Supervisors and Managers.
c. Support Personnel.
D. New Hires into the Demonstration Project
E. Conversion or Movement from Demonstration Project
1. Grade Determination.
2. Pay Setting
3. Employees in Positions Classified Above GS-15
4. Determining Date of Last Equivalent Increase
C. Personnel Administration
D. Automation
E. Experimentation and Revision
VII. Demonstration Project Duration
VIII. Demonstration Project Evaluation Plan
A. Overview
B. Evaluation Model
IX. Demonstration Project Costs
A. Cost Discipline
B. Implementation Costs
X. Automation Support
A. General
B. Defense Civilian Personnel Data System (DCPDS)
C. Core Document (COREDOC)
D. RIF Support System (RIFSS)
E. Contribution-based Compensation System Data System
Appendix A. Summary of Demonstration Project Features Adopted by ONR
Appendix B: Required Waivers to Laws and Regulations
Appendix C: Definitions of Career Tracks and Pay Bands
Appendix D: Table of Occupational Series Within Career Tracks
Appendix E: Classification and CCS Elements
Appendix F: Computation of the IPS and the NPR
Appendix G: Intervention Model
I. Executive Summary
This project adopts with some modifications the STRL personnel
management demonstration project designed by NRL and an additional
flexibility from the AMRDEC personnel management demonstration project.
The modified design of the demonstration project described herein was
developed by ONR with the participation of and review by the DON, the
DoD, and incorporation of the knowledge and design of other STRL
demonstration projects.
The ONR coordinates, executes, and promotes the science and
technology programs of the United States Navy and Marine Corps. ONR's
directorates balance a robust science and technology portfolio,
allocating funds to meet the warfighter's requirements, focusing
efforts on all three major phases of development funding: basic
research, applied research, and advanced technology development. ONR's
six science and technology departments coordinate and execute research
in the areas of:
1. Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare and Combating Terrorism
[[Page 30200]]
2. Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance,
and Reconnaissance
3. Ocean Battlespace Sensing
4. Sea Warfare and Weapons
5. Warfighter Performance
6. Naval Air Warfare and Weapons
In order to sustain these unique capabilities, ONR must be able to
hire, retain, and continually motivate enthusiastic, innovative, and
highly-educated scientists and engineers, supported by accomplished
business management and administrative professionals as well as a
skilled administrative and technical support staff.
The goal of the project is to enhance the quality and
professionalism of the ONR workforce through improvements in the
efficiency and effectiveness of the human resource system. The project
flexibilities will strive to achieve the best workforce for the ONR
mission, adjust the workforce for change, and improve organizational
efficiency. The results of the project will be evaluated within five
years of implementation
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of the project is to demonstrate that the effectiveness
of DoD STRLs can be enhanced by expanding opportunities available to
employees and by allowing greater managerial control over personnel
functions through a more responsive and flexible personnel system.
Federal laboratories need more efficient, cost effective, and timely
processes and methods to acquire and retain a highly creative,
productive, educated, and trained workforce. This project, in its
entirety, attempts to improve employees' opportunities and provide
managers, at the lowest practical level, the authority, control, and
flexibility needed to achieve the highest quality organization and hold
them accountable for the proper exercise of this authority within the
framework of an improved personnel management system.
Many aspects of a demonstration project are experimental.
Modifications may be made from time to time as experience is gained,
results are analyzed, and conclusions are reached on how the system is
working. The provisions of this project plan will not be modified, or
extended to individuals or groups of employees not included in the
project plan without the approval of the ODUSD(CPP). The provisions of
DoDI 1400.37, are to be followed for any modifications, adoptions, or
changes to this demonstration project plan.
B. Problems With the Current System
The current Civil Service GS system has existed in essentially the
same form since the 1920's. Work is classified into one of fifteen
overlapping pay ranges that correspond with the fifteen grades. Base
pay is set at one of those fifteen grades and the ten interim steps
within each grade. The Classification Act of 1949 rigidly defines types
of work by occupational series and grade, with very precise
qualifications for each job. This system does not quickly or easily
respond to new ways of designing work or to changes in the work itself.
The performance management model that has existed since the passage
of the Civil Service Reform Act has come under extreme criticism.
Employees frequently report there is inadequate communication of
performance expectations and feedback on performance. There are
perceived inaccuracies in performance ratings with general agreement
that the ratings are inflated and often unevenly distributed by grade,
occupation, and geographic location.
The need to change the current hiring system is essential as ONR
must be able to recruit and retain scientific, engineering, acquisition
support and other professionals, and skilled technicians. ONR must be
able to compete with the private sector for the best talent and be able
to make job offers in a timely manner with the attendant bonuses and
incentives to attract high quality employees.
Finally, current limitations on training, retraining, and otherwise
developing employees make it difficult to correct skill imbalances and
to prepare current employees for new lines of work to meet changing
missions and emerging technologies.
C. Waivers Required
ONR proposes changes in the following broad areas to address its
problems in human resources management: Accessions and internal
placements, sustainment, and separations. Appendix B lists the laws,
rules, and regulations requiring waivers to enable ONR to implement the
proposed systems. All personnel laws, rules, and regulations not waived
by this plan will remain in effect. Basic employee rights will be
safeguarded and Merit System Principles will be maintained.
D. Expected Benefits
The primary benefit expected from this demonstration project is
greater organizational effectiveness through increased employee
satisfaction. The long-standing Department of the Navy ``China Lake''
and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
demonstration projects have produced impressive statistics on increased
job satisfaction and quality of employees versus that for the Federal
workforce in general. This project will demonstrate that a human
resource system tailored to the mission and needs of the ONR workforce
will facilitate:
(1) Sustainment of ONR's quality scientific and business management
workforces in today's competitive environment;
(2) Improved employee satisfaction with pay setting and adjustment,
recognition, and career advancement opportunities;
(3) Human Resources (HR) flexibilities needed to staff and shape a
quality workforce of the next 10-20 years;
(4) Increased retention of high-level contributors; and
(5) Simpler and more cost effective HR management processes.
An evaluation model was developed for the Director, Defense,
Research and Engineering (DDR&E) in conjunction with STRL service
representatives and the OPM. The model will measure the effectiveness
of this demonstration project, as modified in this plan, and will be
used to measure the results of specific personnel system changes.
E. Participating Organizations and Employees
ONR is comprised of the ONR Headquarters in Arlington, Virginia,
and ONR employees geographically dispersed at the locations shown in
Figure 1. It should be noted that some sites currently have fewer than
ten people and that the sites may change should ONR reorganize or
realign. Successor organizations will continue coverage in the
demonstration project.
The demonstration project will cover approximately 450 ONR civilian
employees under title 5, U.S.C. in the occupations listed in Appendix
D. The project plan does not cover members of the Senior Executive
Service (SES), Senior Level (SL), Scientific and Professional (ST),
expert and consultant employees (EH), or Administratively Determined
(AD) pay plans. However, SES, SL, and ST employees, after leaving
Federal government service, may participate in the Voluntary Emeritus
Program. There are no labor unions representing ONR employees.
[[Page 30201]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28MY10.003
F. Project Design
In response to the initial authority granted by Congress to develop
a demonstration project, ONR chartered a design team to develop the
project plan. The team was led by a senior ONR manager from outside the
Human Resources Office (HRO) and was responsible for developing project
proposals. The team was composed of 20 employees of different grade
levels and in different occupations. There was a mix of managers,
supervisors, and non-supervisors from offices throughout ONR. The team
had the assistance of HR personnel from ONR and from NRL. It also
received information and advice from OPM, the Office of the DUSD (CPP),
and a number of organizations with on-going demonstration projects.
Information and suggestions were solicited from ONR employees and
managers through interviews, briefings, small-group meetings, and a
suggestion program established specifically for the design effort. This
plan was submitted to DUSD (CPP) in 2001. Work on this plan was
postponed pending the outcome of several Departmental HR initiatives
addressing new personnel systems.
Following enactment of Public Law 110-181, ONR undertook an effort
to review and resubmit the demonstration project plan. Upon extensive
review and discussion with internal and external stakeholders, ONR
leadership decided to adopt existing flexibilities according to
subsection 1107(c) of Public Law 110-181, 73 FR 73248, and DoDI
1400.37. Specifically, ONR proposes to adopt the NRL demonstration
project plus an additional flexibility from the AMRDEC demonstration
project. Appendix A summarizes the modifications proposed for each of
the adopted project flexibilities and administrative procedures.
Modifications to existing flexibilities are made when necessary to
address ONR's specific organizational, workforce, and approval needs
and technical modifications to conform to changes in the law and
governing OPM regulations, which are not being waived, that were
effected after the publication of the NRL personnel demonstration
project plan. Further changes to the project plan may be made in
response to comments received during the 30-day comment period
following publication of this notice.
III. Accessions and Internal Placements
A. Hiring Authority
1. Background
Private industry and academia are the principal recruiting sources
for scientists and engineers at ONR. It is extremely difficult to make
timely offers of employment to hard-to-find scientists and engineers.
Even when a candidate is identified, he or she often finds another job
opportunity before the lengthy recruitment process can be completed.
2. Delegated Examining
a. Competitive service positions within the ONR Demonstration
Project will be filled through Merit Staffing or under Delegated
Examining.
b. The ``Rule of Three'' will be eliminated. When there are no more
than 15 qualified applicants and no preference eligibles, all eligible
applicants are immediately referred to the selecting official without
rating and ranking. Rating and ranking will be required only when the
number of qualified candidates exceeds 15 or there is a mix of
preference and nonpreference applicants. Statutes and regulations
covering veterans' preference will be observed in the selection process
and when rating and ranking are required. If the candidates are rated
and ranked, a random number selection method using the application
control number will be used to determine which applicants will be
referred when scores are tied after the rating process. Veterans will
be referred ahead of non-veterans with the same score.
B. Legal Authority
For actions taken under the auspices of the ONR Demonstration
Project, the legal authority, Public Law 103-337, will be used. For all
other actions, ONR will continue to use the nature of action codes and
legal authority codes prescribed by OPM, DoD, or DON.
C. Determining Employee and Applicant Qualifications
Figure 2 displays the minimum General Schedule (GS) qualifications
requirements for each career path and pay band level. Special DON or
DoD requirements not covered by the OPM Qualification Standards
Operating Manual for GS Positions, such as
[[Page 30202]]
Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) qualification
requirements for acquisition positions, physical performance
requirements for sea duty, work on board aircraft, etc., must be met.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28MY10.004
D. Noncitizen Hiring
Where Executive Orders or other regulations limit hiring
noncitizens, ONR will have the authority to approve the hiring of
noncitizens into competitive service positions when qualified U.S.
citizens are not available. Under the demonstration project, as with
the current system, a noncitizen may be appointed only if it has been
determined there are no qualified U.S. citizens. In order to make this
determination, the position will be advertised extensively throughout
the nation using paid advertisements in major newspapers or scientific
journals, etc., as well as the ``normal'' recruiting methods. If a
noncitizen is the only qualified candidate for the position, the
candidate may be appointed. The selection is subject to approval by the
Department Head or Director of the hiring organization. The
demonstration project constitutes a delegated examining agreement from
OPM for the purposes of 5 CFR 213.3102(bb).
E. Expanded Detail Authority
Under the demonstration project, ONR's approving manager would have
the authority:
(1) To effect details up to one year to demonstration project
positions without the current 120-day renewal requirement; and
(2) To effect details to a higher level position in the
demonstration project up to one year within a 24-month period without
competition.
Details beyond the one-year require the approval of the Chief of
Naval Research or designee and are not subject to the 120-day renewal
requirement.
F. Extended Probationary Period
All current laws and regulations for the current probationary
period are retained except that nonstatus candidates hired under the
demonstration project in occupations where the nature of the work
requires the manager to have more than one year to assess the
employee's job performance will serve a three-year probationary period.
Employees with veterans' preference will maintain their rights under
current law and regulation.
G. Definitions
1. Basic Pay
The total amount of pay received at the rate fixed through CCS
adjustment for the position held by an employee including any merit
increase but before any deductions and exclusive of additional pay of
any other kind.
2. Maintained Pay
An employee may be entitled to maintain his or her rate of basic
pay if that rate exceeds the maximum rate of basic pay for his or her
pay band as a result of certain personnel actions (as described in this
plan). An employee's initial maintained pay rate is equal to the lesser
of (1) the basic pay held by the employee at the time an action is
taken which entitles the employee to maintain his or her pay or (2) 150
percent of the maximum rate of basic pay of the pay band to which
assigned. The employee is entitled to maintained pay for 2 years or
until the employee's basic pay is equal to or more than the employee's
maintained pay, whichever occurs first. Exceptions to the 2-year limit
include employees on grade and pay retention ``grandfathered'' in upon
initial conversion into the demonstration project, former special rate
employees receiving maintained pay as a result of conversion into the
project, and employees placed through
[[Page 30203]]
the priority placement programs. Employees will receive half of the
across-the-board GS percentage increase in basic pay and the full
locality pay increase while on maintained pay. Upon termination of
maintained pay, the employee's basic pay will be adjusted according to
the CCS appraisal process. If the employee's basic pay exceeds the
maximum basic pay of his or her pay band upon expiration of the 2-year
period, the employee's pay will not be reduced; the employee will be in
the overcompensated range of basic pay category for CCS pay increase
purposes, see Figure 9.
Maintained pay shall cease to apply to an employee who: (1) Has a
break in service of 1 workday or more; or (2) is demoted for personal
cause or at the employee's request. The employee's maintained rate of
pay is basic pay for purposes of locality pay (locality pay is basic
pay for purposes of retirement, life insurance, premium pay, severance
pay, advances in pay, workers' compensation, and lump-sum payments for
annual leave but not for computing promotion increases). Employees
promoted while on maintained pay may have their basic pay (excluding
locality pay) set up to 20 percent greater than the maximum basic pay
for their current pay band or retain their ``maintained pay,''
whichever is greater.
3. Promotion
The movement of an employee to a higher pay band within the same
career track or to a different career track and pay band in which the
new pay band has a higher maximum basic salary rate than the pay band
from which the employee is leaving.
4. Reassignment
The movement of an employee from one position to another position
within the same pay band in the same career track or to a position in
another career track and pay band in which the new pay band has the
same maximum basic salary rate as the pay band from which the employee
is leaving.
5. Change to Lower Pay Band
The movement of an employee to a lower pay band within the same
career track or to a different career track and pay band in which the
new pay band has a lower maximum basic salary range than the pay band
from which the employee is leaving.
6. Pay Adjustment
Any increase or decrease in an employee's rate of basic pay where
there is no change in the employee's position. Termination of
maintained pay is also a pay adjustment.
7. Detail
The temporary assignment of an employee to a different
demonstration project position for a specified period when the employee
is expected to return to his or her regular duties at the end of the
assignment. (An employee who is on detail is considered for pay and
strength purposes to be permanently occupying his or her regular
position.)
8. Highest Previous Rate
ONR will establish maximum payable rate rules that parallel the
rules in 5 CFR 531.202 and 531.203(c) and (d).
9. Approving Manager
Managers at the directorate, division head, division
superintendent, or directorate-level staff offices who have budget
allocation/execution; position management; position classification;
recruitment; and staffing authorities for their organization.
H. Pay Setting Determinations Outside the CCS
1. External New Hires
a. This includes reinstatements. Initial basic pay for new
appointees into the demonstration project may be set at any point
within the basic pay range for the career track, occupation, and pay
band to which appointed that is consistent with the special
qualifications of the individual and the unique requirements of the
position. These special qualifications may be consideration of
education, training, experience, scarcity of qualified applicants,
labor market considerations, programmatic urgency, or any combination
thereof which is pertinent to the position to which appointed. Highest
previous rate may be used to set the pay of new appointees into the
demonstration project. (The approving manager authorizes the basic
pay.)
b. Transfers from within DoD and other Federal agencies will have
their pay set using pay setting policy for internal actions based on
the type of pay action.
c. A recruitment or relocation bonus may be paid using the same
provisions available for GS employees under 5 U.S.C. 5753. Employees
placed through the DoD Priority Placement Program (PPP), the DON
Reemployment Priority List (RPL), or the Federal Interagency Career
Transition Assistance Plan are entitled to the last earned rate if they
have been separated.
2. Internal Actions
These actions cover employees within the demonstration project,
including demonstration project employees who apply and are selected
for a position within the project.
a. Promotion.
When an employee is promoted, the basic pay after promotion may be
up to 20 percent greater than the employee's current basic pay.
However, if the minimum rate of the new pay band is more than 20
percent greater than the employee's current basic pay, then the minimum
rate of the new pay band is the new basic pay. The employee's basic pay
may not exceed the basic pay range of the new pay band. Highest
previous rate may be applied, if appropriate. (The approving manager
authorizes the basic pay.) Note: Most target pay band promotions will
be accomplished through the CCS appraisal and pay adjustment process
(see section IV.C.8).
b. Pay Adjustment (Voluntary Change to Lower Pay) or Change to
Lower Pay Band (except RIF).
When an employee accepts a voluntary change to lower pay or lower
pay band, basic pay may be set at any point within the pay band to
which appointed, except that the new basic pay will not exceed the
employee's current basic pay or the maximum basic pay of the pay band
to which assigned, whichever is lower. Highest previous rate may be
applied, if appropriate. (The approving manager authorizes the basic
pay.)
(1) Examples of Voluntary Change to a Lower Pay Band. An employee
in an Administrative Specialist and Professional Career Track, Pay Band
III, position may decide he or she would prefer a Pay Band II position
in the Administrative Support Career Track because it offers a
different work schedule or duty station. An employee in Level IV of the
Administrative Specialist and Professional Career Track who has a
family member with a serious medical problem and wants to be relieved
of supervisory responsibilities may request a change to Pay Band III.
(2) Example of Pay Adjustment (Voluntary Change to Lower Pay) or
change to a Lower Pay Band. An employee may accept a change to lower
pay or to a lower pay band through a settlement agreement. A Research
Physicist, who is in Level III and is being paid near the top of Level
III, is rated unacceptable in the critical element Research and
Development (R&D) Business Management. In settlement of a proposal to
remove this employee for unacceptable performance, an agreement is
reached which reduces
[[Page 30204]]
the employee's pay to a rate near the beginning of Level III.
c. Pay Adjustment (Involuntary Change to Lower Pay) or Change to
Lower Pay Band Due to Adverse or Performance-based Action.
When an employee is changed to a lower pay band, or receives a
change to lower pay due to an adverse or performance-based action, the
employee's basic pay will be reduced by at least 6 percent, but will be
set at a rate within the rate range for the pay band to which assigned.
(The approving manager authorizes the basic pay.) Such employees will
be afforded appeal rights as provided by 5 U.S.C. 4303 or 7512, as
appropriate.
d. Involuntary Change to Lower Pay Band or Reassignment to a Career
Track with a Lower Salary Range, Other than Adverse or Performance-
based.
If the change is not a result of an adverse or performance-based
action, the basic pay will be preserved to the extent possible within
the basic pay range of the new pay band. If the pay cannot be set
within the rate range of the new pay band, it will be set at the
maximum rate of the new pay band and the employee's pay will be
reduced. If the change is a result of a position reclassification
resulting in the employee being assigned to a lower pay band or
reassigned to a different career track with a lower maximum basic
salary range, the employee is entitled to maintained pay if the
employee's current salary exceeds the maximum rate for the new band.
e. RIF Action (including employees who are offered and accept a
vacancy at a lower pay band or in a different career track).
The employee is entitled to maintained pay, if the employee's
current salary exceeds the maximum rate for the new band.
f. Upward Mobility or Other Formal Training Program Selection.
The employee is entitled to maintained pay, if the employee's
current salary exceeds the maximum rate for the new band.
g. Return to Limited or Light Duty from a Disability as a Result of
Occupational Injury to a Position in a Lower Pay Band or to a Career
Track with Lower Basic Pay Potential than Held Prior to the Injury.
The employee is entitled indefinitely to the basic pay held prior
to the injury and will receive full general and locality pay increases.
If upon reemployment, an employee was not given the higher basic pay
(basic pay received at the time of the injury), any retirement annuity
or severance pay computation would be based on his or her lower basic
pay (salary based on placement in a lower pay band). Even though the
Department of Labor (DOL) would make up the difference between the
lower basic pay and the higher basic pay earned at the time of injury,
the DOL portion is not considered in the retirement or severance pay
computation.
h. Restoration to Duty.
Employees returning from the uniformed services following an
absence of more than 30 days must be restored as soon as possible after
making application, but not later than 30 days after receipt of
application. If the employee's uniformed service was for less than 91
days the employee will be placed in the position that he or she would
have attained if continuously employed. If not qualified for this
position, employee will be placed in the position he or she left. For
service of 91 days or more, the employee may also be placed in a
position of like seniority, status, and pay. In the case of an employee
with a disability incurred in or aggravated during uniformed service,
and after reasonable efforts to accommodate the disability is entitled
to be placed in another position for which qualified that will provide
the employee with the same seniority, status, and pay, or the nearest
approximation.
i. Reassignment.
The basic pay normally remains the same. Highest previous rate may
be applied, if appropriate. (The approving manager authorizes the basic
pay).
j. Student Educational Employment Program.
The Student Educational Employment Program consists of two
components: The Student Temporary Employment Program and the Student
Career Experience Program. Initial basic pay for students in either of
these programs may be set at any point within the basic pay range for
the career track, occupation, and pay band to which appointed. Basic
pay may be increased upon return to duty (RTD) or conversion to
temporary appointment, in consideration of the student's additional
education and experience at the time of the action. Students who work
under a parallel work study program may have their basic pay increased
in consideration of additional education and/or experience. Basic pay
for students may be increased based on their CCS appraisal. (The
approving manager authorizes the basic pay).
k. Hazard Pay or Pay for Duty Involving Physical Hardship.
Employees under the demonstration project will be paid hazardous
duty pay under the provisions of 5 CFR part 550, subpart I.
I. Priority Placement Program (PPP)
Current PPP procedures apply to new hires and internal actions.
J. Expanded Temporary Promotion
Current regulations require that temporary promotions for more than
120 days to a higher level position than previously held must be made
competitively. Under the demonstration project, ONR would be able to
effect temporary promotions of not more than one year within a 24-month
period without competition to positions within the demonstration
project.
K. Voluntary Emeritus Program
The ONR Voluntary Emeritus Program is similar to the Voluntary
Emeritus Program presented in the AMRDEC demonstration project FRN,
section III.D.5., page 34890. Under the ONR program, the CNR will have
the authority to offer retired or separated individuals voluntary
assignments at ONR. This authority will include individuals who have
retired or separated from Federal service. Voluntary Emeritus Program
assignments are not considered ``employment'' by the Federal government
(except for purposes of injury compensation). Thus, such assignments do
not affect an employee's entitlement to buyouts or severance payments
based on an earlier separation from Federal service. The Voluntary
Emeritus Program will ensure continued quality research while reducing
the overall salary line by allowing higher paid individuals to accept
retirement incentives with the opportunity to retain a presence in the
scientific community. The program will be of most benefit during
manpower reductions as senior employees could accept retirement and
return to provide valuable on-the-job training or mentoring to less
experienced employees. Voluntary service will not be used to replace
any employee or interfere with career opportunities of employees.
To be accepted into the emeritus program, a volunteer must be
recommended by ONR managers to the CNR or designee. Everyone who
applies is not entitled to a voluntary assignment. The approving
official must clearly document the decision process for each applicant
(whether accepted or rejected) and retain the documentation throughout
the assignment. Documentation of rejections will be maintained for two
years.
To ensure success and encourage participation, the volunteer's
Federal retirement pay (whether military or
[[Page 30205]]
civilian) will not be affected while serving in a voluntary capacity.
Retired or separated Federal employees may accept an emeritus position
without a break or mandatory waiting period.
Volunteers will not be permitted to monitor contracts on behalf of
the government or to participate on any contracts or solicitations
where a conflict of interest exists. The same rules that currently
apply to source selection members will apply to volunteers.
An agreement will be established between the volunteer, the CNR or
designee, and the HRO Director. The agreement will be reviewed by the
local Legal Office for ethics determinations under the Joint Ethics
Regulation. The agreement must be finalized before the assumption of
duties and shall include:
(1) A statement that the voluntary assignment does not constitute
an appointment in the civil service, is without compensation, and any
and all claims against the Government (because of the voluntary
assignment) are waived by the volunteer;
(2) a statement that the volunteer will be considered a Federal
employee for the purpose of injury compensation;
(3) volunteer's work schedule;
(4) length of agreement (defined by length of project or time
defined by weeks, months, or years);
(5) support provided by the ONR (travel, administrative, office
space, supplies);
(6) a one-page Statement of Duties and Experience;
(7) a provision that states no additional time will be added to a
volunteer's service credit for such purposes as retirement, severance
pay, and leave as a result of being a member of the Voluntary Emeritus
Program;
(8) a provision allowing either party to void the agreement with 10
working days written notice; and
(9) the level of security access required (any security clearance
required by the assignment will be managed by the ONR while the
volunteer is a member of the Voluntary Emeritus Program).
IV. Sustainment
A. Position Classification
The position classification changes are intended to streamline and
simplify the process of identifying and categorizing the work done at
ONR. ONR will establish an Integrated Pay Schedule (IPS) for all
demonstration project positions in covered occupations. The IPS will
replace the current GS and extend the pay schedule equivalent to the
basic pay range of the Government's Senior Level Pay System to
accommodate positions classified above the GS-15 level under a proposed
new STRL demonstration project initiative being developed by DoD.
1. Career Tracks and Pay Bands
Within the IPS, occupations with similar characteristics will be
grouped together into four career tracks. Each career track consists of
a number of pay bands, representing the phases of career progression
that are typical for the respective career track. The pay bands within
each career track are shown in Figure 3, along with their GS
equivalents. The equivalents are based on the levels of responsibility
as defined in 5 U.S.C. 5104 and not on current basic pay schedules.
Appendix C provides definitions for each of the career tracks and the
pay bands within them. The career tracks and pay bands were developed
based upon administrative, organizational, and position management
considerations at ONR. They are designed to enhance pay equity and
enable a more seamless career progression to the target pay band for an
individual position or category of positions. This combination of
career tracks and pay bands allows for competitive recruitment of
quality candidates at differing rates of compensation within the
appropriate career track, occupation, and pay band. It will also
facilitate movement and placement based upon contribution, in
conjunction with the CCS described in paragraph IV.C. Other benefits of
this arrangement include a dual career track for S&E employees and
greater competitiveness with academia and private industry for
recruitment. Appendix D identifies the occupational series currently
within each of the three career tracks.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28MY10.005
a. Target Pay Band.
Each position will have a designated target pay band under the
demonstration project. This target pay band will be identified as the
pay band to which an incumbent may be advanced without further
competition within a career track. These target pay bands will be based
upon present full performance levels. Target pay bands may vary based
upon occupation or career track. Employees' basic pay will be capped at
the target pay band until other appropriate conditions (e.g.,
competition, position management approval, increase in or acquisition
of higher level duties, and approval of an accretion of duties
promotion) have been met, and the employee has been promoted into the
next higher level.
b. Occupational Series and Position Titling.
Presently, ONR positions are identified by occupational groups and
series of classes in accordance with OPM position classification
standards. Under the demonstration project, ONR will continue to use
occupational series designators consistent with those currently
authorized by OPM to identify positions. This will facilitate related
personnel management requirements, such as movement into and out of the
[[Page 30206]]
demonstration project. Other occupational series may be added or
deleted as needed to support the demonstration project.
Interdisciplinary positions will be accommodated within the system
based upon the qualifications of the individual hired.
Titling practices consistent with those established by OPM
classification standards will be used to determine the official title.
Such practice will facilitate other personnel management requirements,
such as the following: Movement into and out of the demonstration
project, reduction in force, external reporting requirements, and
recruitment. CCS pay band descriptors and Requirements Document (RD)
(see paragraph IV.A.2) information will be used for specific career
track, pay band, and titling determinations.
c. Classification Standards.
Under the proposed demonstration project, the number of
classification standards would be reduced to three (see Figure 3). Each
standard would align with one of the three career tracks and would
cover all positions within that career track. Each career track has two
or three elements that are considered in both classifying a position
and in judging an individual's contributions for pay setting purposes.
Each element has generic descriptors for every pay band. These
descriptors explain the type of work, degree of responsibility, and
scope of contributions that need to be ultimately accomplished to reach
the highest basic pay potential within each pay band. (See Appendix E.)
To classify a position, a manager would select the pay band which is
most indicative overall of the type of duties to be performed and the
contributions needed. For example: A supervisor needs a secretarial
position for a branch. In reading the elements and descriptors for the
Administrative Support Career Track, the supervisor determines that the
Level II descriptors illustrate the type of work and contributions
needed. Therefore, the position would be classified as a Secretary,
Level II.
d. Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Demonstration project positions will be covered under the FLSA and
5 CFR part 551. Determination of their status (exempt or nonexempt)
will be made based on the criteria contained in 5 CFR part 551. The
status of each new position under the demonstration project will be
determined using computer assisted analysis as part of an automated
process for preparing the RD. Those positions for which the computer is
unable to make the final FLSA determination will be ``flagged'' for
referral to a human resources specialist for determination.
(1) Guidelines for FLSA Determinations.
i. Supervisory Information: Provided through an automated system in
a checklist format; results of this checklist have an impact on FLSA
determination.
ii. FLSA Information: Provided through an automated system in a
checklist format; results of this checklist in conjunction with the
supervisory information provide a basis for the FLSA determination.
iii. If required, the section entitled ``Purpose of Position'' will
be used to assist in FLSA determination.
iv. RD's requiring additional review before being finalized will be
forwarded to a human resources specialist to review the FLSA
determination.
(2) Nonsupervisory and Leader Positions.
Figure 4 shows the exempt or nonexempt status applicable to
nonsupervisory and leader positions in the indicated career track and
pay band. In those cases where ``Review'' is indicated, the FLSA status
must be determined based on the specific duties and responsibilities of
the subject position.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN28MY10.006
(3) Supervisory Positions.
FLSA determination for supervisory positions must be made based on
the duties and responsibilities of the particular position involved. As
a rule, if a position requires supervision of employees who are exempt
under FLSA, the supervisory position is likely to be exempt also.
2. Requirements Document (RD)
An RD will replace the Optional Form 8 and position description
used under the current classification system. The RD will be prepared
by managers using a menu-driven, automated system. The automated system
will enable managers to classify and establish many positions without
intervention by a human resources specialist. The abbreviated RD will
combine the position information, staffing requirements, and
contribution expectations into a 1- or 2-page document.
3. Delegation of Classification Authority
Classification authority will be delegated to managers as a means
of increasing managerial effectiveness and expediting the
classification function. This will be accomplished as follows:
a. Delegated Authority.
i. The CNR will delegate classification authority to the Human
Resources Office (HRO) Director. The HRO Director may further delegate
authority to Department Heads and Directors of
[[Page 30207]]
the immediate organization of the position being classified.
ii. The classification approval must be at least one level above
the first-level supervisor of the position.
iii. First-line supervisors at any level will provide
classification recommendations.
iv. HRO support will be available for guidance and recommendations
concerning the classification process. (Any dispute over the proper
classification between a manager and the HRO will be resolved by the
CNR or designee.
b. Position Classification Accountability.
Those to whom authority is delegated are accountable to the CNR.
The CNR is accountable to the DON. Those with delegated authority are
expected to comply with demonstration project guidelines on
classification and position management, observe the principle of equal
pay for equal work, and ensure that RD's are current. First-line
supervisors will develop positions using the automated system. All
positions must be approved through the proper chain of command.
B. Integrated Pay Schedule
Under the demonstration project, an IPS will be established which
will cover all demonstration project positions at ONR. This IPS, which
does not include locality pay, will initially extend from the basic pay
for GS-1, step 1 to the basic pay for GS-15, step 10. The adjusted
basic pay cap, which does include locality pay, is Executive Level IV,
currently $155,500. The salary range for the S&E pay band V pay band is
expected to be established under the new STRL demonstration project
initiative being developed for positions classified above GS-15.
1. Annual Pay Action
ONR will eliminate separate pay actions for within-grade increases,
general and locality pay increases, performance awards, quality step
increases, and most career promotions and replace them with a single
annual pay action (including either permanent or bonus pay or both)
linked to the CCS. This will eliminate the paperwork and processing
associated with multiple pay actions which average three per employee
per year.
2. Overtime Pay
Overtime will be paid in accordance with 5 CFR part 550, subpart A.
All nonexempt employees will be paid overtime based upon their ``hourly
regular rate of pay,'' as defined in existing regulation (5 CFR part
551).
3. Classification Appeals
An employee may appeal the occupational series, title, career
track, or pay band of his or her position at any time. An employee must
formally raise the area of concern to supervisors in the immediate
chain of command, either verbally or in writing. If an employee is not
satisfied with the supervisory response, he or she may then appeal to
the DoD appellate level. If an employee is not satisfied with the DoD
response, he or she may then appeal to the OPM only after DoD has
rendered a decision under the provisions of this demonstration project.
Since OPM does not accept classification appeals on positions which
exceed the equivalent of a GS-15 level, appeal decisions involving Pay
Band V for science and engineering positions classified about the GS-15
level will be rendered by DoD and will be final. Appellate decisions
from OPM are final and binding on all administrative, certifying,
payroll, disbursing, and accounting officials of the Government. Time
periods for case processing under 5 CFR subpart F, sections 511.603,
511.604, and 511.605 apply.
An employee may not appeal the accuracy of the RD, the
demonstration project classification criteria, or the pay-setting
criteria; the propriety of a basic pay schedule; the assignment of
occupational series to the occupational family; or matters grievable
under an administrative or negotiated grievance procedure, or an
alternative dispute resolution procedure.
The evaluation of classification appeals under this demonstration
project is based upon the demonstration project classification
criteria. Case files will be forwarded for adjudication through the HRO
and will include copies of appropriate demonstration project criteria.
4. Above GS-15 Positions
The pay banding plan for the Scientific and Engineering
occupational family includes a pay band V to provide the ability to
accommodate positions with duties and responsibilities that exceed the
General Schedule GS-15 classification criteria. This pay band is based
on the Above GS-15 Position concept found in other STRL personnel
management demonstration projects that was created to solve a critical
classification problem. The STRLs have positions warranting
classification above GS-15 because of their technical expertise
requirements including inherent supervisory and managerial
responsibilities. However, these positions are not considered to be
appropriately classified as Scientific and Professional Positions (STs)
because of the degree of supervision and level of managerial
responsibilities. Neither are these positions appropriately classified
as Senior Executive Service (SES) positions because of their
requirement for advanced specialized scientific or engineering
expertise and because the positions are not at the level of general
managerial authority and impact required for an SES position.
The original Above GS-15 Position concept was to be tested for a
five-year period. The number of trial positions was set at 40 with
periodic reviews to determine appropriate position requirements. The
Above GS-15 Position concept is currently being evaluated by DoD
management for its effectiveness; continued applicability to the
current STRL scientific, engineering, and technology workforce needs;
and appropriate allocation of billets based on mission requirements.
The degree to which ONR plans to participate in this concept and
develop classification, compensation, and performance management
policy, guidance, and implementation processes will be based on the
final outcome of the DoD evaluation.
5. Distinguished Contributions Allowance (DCA)
The DCA is a temporary monetary allowance up to 25 percent of basic
pay (which, when added to an employee's rate of basic pay, may not
exceed the rate of basic pay for Executive Level IV) paid on either a
bi-weekly basis (concurrent with normal pay days) or as a lump sum
following completion of a designated contribution period(s), or
combination of these, at the discretion of ONR. It is not basic pay for
any purpose, i.e., retirement, life insurance, severance pay,
promotion, or any other payment or benefit calculated as a percentage
of basic pay. The DCA will be available to certain employees at the top
of their target pay bands, whose present contributions are worthy of
scores found at a higher pay band, whose level of contribution is
expected to continue at the higher pay band for at least 1 year, and
current market conditions require additional compensation.
Assignment of the DCA rather than a change to a higher pay band
will generally be appropriate for such employees under the following
circumstances: Employees have reached the top of their target pay bands
and (1) when it is not certain that the higher level contributions will
continue indefinitely (e.g., a special project expected to be of one-
up to five-year
[[Page 30208]]
duration); (2) when no further promotion or compensation opportunities
are available; (3) in either situation (1) or (2), current market
conditions compensate similar contributions at a greater rate in like
positions in private industry and academia; and (4) there is a history
of significant recruitment and retention difficulties associated with
such positions.
a. Eligibility.
(1) Employees in Levels III and IV of the S&E Professional Career
Track and those in Levels III, IV, and V of the Administrative
Specialist and Professional Career Track are eligible for the DCA if
they have reached the top CCS score for their target pay band with
recommendations for a higher Overall Contribution Score (OCS) for their
contributions; they have reached the maximum rate of basic pay
available for their target pay band; there are externally imposed
limits to higher pay bands or the higher level contributions are not
expected to last indefinitely; and market conditions require greater
compensation for these contributions.
(2) Employees may receive a DCA for up to three years. The DCA
authorization will be reviewed and reauthorized as necessary, but at
least annually at the time of the CCS appraisal through nomination by
the pay pool manager and approval by the CNR. Employees in the S&E
Professional Career Track may receive an extension of up to two
additional years (for a total of five years). The DCA extension
authorization will be reviewed and reauthorized as necessary, but at
least on an annual basis at the time of the CCS appraisal through
nomination by the pay pool manager and approval by the CNR.
(3) Monetary payment may be up to 25 percent of basic pay.
(4) Nominees would be required to sign a memorandum of
understanding or a statement indicating they understand that the DCA is
a temporary allowance; it is not a part of basic pay for any purpose;
it would be subject to review at any time, but at least on an annual
basis; and the reduction or termination of the DCA is not appealable or
grievable.
b. Nomination.
In connection with the annual CCS appraisal process, pay pool
managers may nominate eligible employees who meet the criteria for the
DCA. Packages containing the recommended amount and method of payment
of the DCA and a justification for the allowance will be forwarded
through the supervisory chain to the CNR. Details regarding this
process will be addressed in standard operating procedures. These
details will include time frames for nomination and consideration,
payout scheme, justification content and format, budget authority,
guidelines for selecting employees for the allowance and for
determining the appropriate amount, and documentation required by the
employee acknowledging he or she understands the criteria and temporary
nature of the DCA.
c. Reduction or Termination of a DCA.
(1) A DCA may be reduced or terminated at any time the ONR deems
appropriate (e.g., when the special project upon which the DCA was
based ends; if performance or contributions decrease significantly; or
if labor market conditions change, etc.). The reduction or termination
of a DCA is not appealable or grievable.
(2) If an employee voluntarily separates from ONR before the
expiration of the DCA, an employee may be denied DCA payment. Authority
to establish conditions and/or penalties will be spelled out in the
written authorization of an individual's DCA.
d. Lump-Sum DCA Payments.
(1) When ONR chooses to pay part or all of an employee's DCA as a
lump sum payable at the end of a designated period, the employee will
accrue entitlement to a growing lump-sum balance each pay period. The
percentage rate established for the lump-sum DCA will be multiplied by
the employee's biweekly amount of basic pay to determine the lump sum
accrual for any pay period. This lump-sum percentage rate is included
in applying the 25 percent limitation.
(2) If an employee covered under a lump-sum DCA authorization
separates, or the DCA is terminated (see paragraph c), before the end
of that designated period, the employee may be entitled to payment of
the accrued and unpaid balance under the conditions established by ONR.
ONR may establish conditions governing lump-sum payments (including
penalties in cases such as voluntary separation or separation for
personal cause) in general plan policies or in the individual
employee's DCA authorization.
e. DCA Budget Allocation.
The CNR may establish a total DCA budget allocation that is never
greater than 10 percent of the basic salaries of the