Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Indiana Bat; Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for a Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit, 29575-29577 [2010-12668]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
would be authorized to occur within
nine days of the first harvest.
Both action alternatives would
manage harvest activities under the
guidelines of a harvest management
plan cooperatively developed by the
NPS and the HIA. NPS would conduct
monitoring activities to ensure that park
resources and values were not impacted.
The Superintendent would retain the
authority to close gull colonies to
harvest.
Victor W. Knox,
Acting Regional Director, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2010–12608 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–HX–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–ES–2010–N094; 30120–1113–000–
F6]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Indiana Bat; Notice of
Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for a
Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan
and Incidental Take Permit
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
draft environmental impact statement
and draft habitat conservation plan;
request for comments.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service) intend to
prepare a draft environmental impact
statement (EIS) to evaluate the impacts
of several alternatives relating to the
proposed issuance of an Endangered
Species Act Permit to EverPower Wind
Holdings, Inc., its subsidiary Buckeye
Wind LLC, and its affiliates (applicant)
for incidental take of the Indiana bat
(Myotis sodalis), a Federal endangered
species, from activities associated with
the construction and operation of a
wind power project in Champaign
County, Ohio. We also announce a
public comment period.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by June 25,
2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Ms.
Megan Seymour, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ohio Field Office, 4625 Morse
Rd., Suite 104, Columbus, OH 43230;
E-mail comments:
EverPowerHCP@fws.gov; or
Fax: (614) 416–8994 (Attention:
Megan Seymour).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Megan Seymour, at (614) 416–8993,
extension 16. Individuals who are
hearing-impaired or speech-impaired
may call the Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877–8337 for TTY assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
publish this notice in compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), and its implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1506.6), and section
10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.). We intend to gather the
information necessary to determine
impacts and alternatives to support a
decision regarding the potential
issuance of an incidental take permit to
the applicant, and the implementation
of the supporting draft HCP. We intend
to prepare an EIS to evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives relating
to the proposed issuance of an
incidental take permit under the Act.
The applicant proposes to apply for an
incidental take permit through
development and implementation of an
HCP. The proposed HCP will cover take
of the Indiana bat that is incidental to
activities associated with the
construction and operation of the
applicant’s Buckeye Wind Energy
project and will include measures
necessary to minimize and mitigate
impacts to the Indiana bat and its
habitat to the maximum extent
practicable.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new
information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community,
Tribes, industry, or any other interested
party on this notice. These comments
will be considered by the Service in
developing a draft EIS and in the
development of an HCP and ITP. We
particularly seek comments concerning:
(1) Biological information concerning
the Indiana bat;
(2) Relevant data concerning wind
power and bat interactions;
(3) Additional information concerning
the range, distribution, population size,
and population trends of the Indiana
bat;
(4) Current or planned activities in the
subject area and their possible impacts
on the Indiana bat;
(5) The presence of archeological
sites, buildings and structures, historic
events, sacred and traditional areas, and
other historic preservation concerns,
which are required to be considered in
project planning by the National
Historic Preservation Act; and
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29575
(6) Identification of any other
environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed
development and permit action.
You may submit your comments and
materials considering this notice by one
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. If you previously submitted
comments on this project during the
public comment period associated with
Federal Register notice 75 FR 4840
(published January 29, 2010), you need
not resubmit your comments. All
previously received comments on this
project will be considered in
development of the draft EIS.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
use in preparing the NEPA document,
will be available for public inspection
by appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ohio Field Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section).
You may obtain copies of this notice on
the Internet at: https://www.fws.gov/
midwest/Endangered/permits/hcp/
r3hcps.html, or by mail from the Ohio
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Background
Section 9 of the Act prohibits ‘‘taking’’
of fish and wildlife species listed as
endangered under section 4 of the Act.
The Act’s implementing regulations
extend, under certain circumstances, the
prohibition of take to threatened
species. Under section 3 of the Act, the
term ‘‘take’’ means ‘‘to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct.’’ The term
‘‘harm’’ is defined by regulation as ‘‘an
act which actually kills or injures
wildlife. Such act may include
significant habitat modification or
degradation where it actually kills or
injures wildlife by significantly
impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, or
sheltering’’ (50 CFR 17.3). The term
‘‘harass’’ is defined in the regulations as
‘‘an intentional or negligent act or
omission which creates the likelihood of
injury to wildlife by annoying it to such
an extent as to significantly disrupt
normal behavioral patterns which
include, but are not limited to, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering’’ (50 CFR 17.3).
Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act requires
an applicant for an incidental take
permit to prepare an HCP that describes:
(1) The impact that will result from such
taking; (2) the steps the applicant will
take to minimize and mitigate that take
to the maximum extent practicable, and
the funding that will be available to
implement such steps; (3) the
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
29576
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
alternative actions to such taking that
the applicant considered and the
reasons why such alternatives are not
being utilized; and (4) the other
measures that the Service may require
as being necessary or appropriate for the
purposes of the plan. The Act requires
the Service to issue an incidental take
permit to an applicant when we
determine that: (1) The taking will be
incidental to otherwise lawful activities;
(2) the applicant will, to the maximum
extent practicable, minimize and
mitigate the impacts of such taking; (3)
the applicant has ensured that adequate
funding for the plan will be provided;
(4) the taking will not appreciably
reduce the likelihood of the survival
and recovery of the species in the wild;
and (5) the measures, if any, we require
as necessary or appropriate for the
purposes of the plan will be met.
Regulations governing permits for
endangered and threatened species are
at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32.
The Indiana bat was added to the list
of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants on March 11, 1967 (32 FR
4001). It is currently listed as an
endangered species under the Act. The
population decline of this species is
attributed to habitat loss and
degradation of both winter hibernation
habitat and summer roosting habitat,
human disturbance during hibernation,
and possibly pesticides. An additional
and emerging threat to Indiana bats is
White-Nose Syndrome, a recently
discovered fungus (Geomyces
destructans) that invades the skin of
bats, causing ulcers which may alter
hibernation arousal patterns, and which
can cause emaciation. The range of the
Indiana bat includes much of the
eastern United States, and Ohio is
located within the core maternity range
of the bat. Winter habitat for the Indiana
bat includes caves and mines that
support high humidity and cool but
stable temperatures. In the summer,
Indiana bats roost under the loose bark
of dead or dying trees. During summer
males roost alone or in small groups,
while females and their offspring roost
in larger groups of up to 100 or more.
Indiana bats forage for insects in and
along the edges of forested areas and
wooded stream corridors. Maternity
colonies of Indiana bats have recently
been detected in Champaign County,
Ohio, though no Indiana bat hibernacula
have been documented in this county.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is issuance of an
incidental take permit for the Indiana
bat during construction and operation of
the applicant’s Buckeye Wind Energy
project. The proposed HCP, which must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
meet the requirements in section
10(a)(2)(A) of the Act, would be
developed and implemented by the
applicant.
The applicant is planning the
development of a wind power project in
Champaign County, Ohio. The project
would be spread across 80,370 acres
within portions of Union, Wayne,
Urbana, Salem, Rush, and Goshen
Townships. Development of the wind
power project would include
installation of up to 100 wind turbines
and associated collection lines, access
roads, utility lines, substations,
operation and maintenance facility
buildings, and temporary staging areas
and concrete batch plants. The wind
turbine hub height will be
approximately 100 meters (m), and the
rotor diameter will be approximately
100 m, for an approximate total height
of 150 m at the rotor apex. Installation
of each individual turbine will
temporarily impact an area of
approximately 2.9 acres, while the final
footprint of each turbine will be
approximately 0.2 acres. Access roads to
the turbines will have a temporary
width of up to 55 feet during
construction, and a permanent width of
16–20 feet. Despite the relatively small
acreage of land to be affected by the
project, impacts to wildlife, particularly
birds and bats, are anticipated.
The project is located in a rural
setting, with the landscape primarily
composed of agricultural properties.
Woodlots are scattered throughout the
project area. Several small towns
(Mutual and Cable) occur within the
project area, and individual homes and
low-density residential areas are also
scattered throughout.
The applicant, in conjunction with
the Service, has determined that take of
Indiana bats is likely to occur from
development of the proposed wind
power project. To authorize take, the
applicant plans to develop an HCP and
request issuance of an ITP from the
Service.
Alternatives
Three action alternatives relating to
the proposed issuance of an ITP to the
applicant for activities associated with
the construction and operation of the
wind power project will be considered
in the draft EIS, along with the potential
impacts associated with each
alternative. Each action alternative
analyzed in the draft EIS will be
compared to the No-Action alternative.
The No-Action alternative represents
estimated future conditions to which
the proposed action can be compared.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
No-Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, an
Incidental Take Permit (ITP) pursuant to
Section 10 (a)(1)(B) of the Act would not
be issued for development of the
Buckeye Wind Project. The proposed
Buckeye Wind Project and HCP would
not occur without issuance of an ITP.
According to the applicant, the Action
Area would be reconsidered and the
existing land uses would be maintained
at the sites of proposed turbines and
other Facility appurtenances until and
unless an ITP could be secured. The
proposed project purpose and need
would not be met under the No Action
Alternative.
Maximally Restricted Operations
Alternative
Under the Maximally Restricted
Operations Alternative, the Facility
would be constructed as described
under Proposed Action—i.e., full buildout of up to 100 turbines. Minimization
for potential impacts to Indiana bats
would include shutting down turbines
at night during the period from April 1
through October 31, the active period
for Indiana bats, every year the Buckeye
Wind Project is in operation.
Modified Operations Alternative
Under the Modified Operations
Alternative, the Facility would be
constructed as described under
Proposed Action, i.e. full build-out of
up to 100 turbines. Minimization for
potential impacts to Indiana bats would
include curtailment of turbines based on
the habitat suitability for Indiana bats at
each proposed turbine location. Habitat
suitability will be determined based on
habitat conditions at 43 roost locations
and 1,124 foraging locations derived
from radio telemetry data from 21
Indiana bats that were captured during
mist-netting activity in 2008 and 2009
in Champaign, Logan, and Hardin
Counties.
Non-Restricted Operations Alternative
Under the Non-Restricted Operations
Alternative, the Facility would be
constructed as described under
Proposed Action—i.e., full build-out of
up to 100 turbines. No operational
minimization for potential impacts to
Indiana bats would occur.
Any preferred alternative developed
by the Service is likely to contain
various measures to avoid and minimize
impacts to Indiana bats, including the
impact of lethal take. Various methods
that may be considered include, but are
not limited to: Protection of roost trees
and surrounding habitat, set-back
distances from known roost trees,
mapping and avoidance of foraging
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
areas, protection and enhancement of
Indiana bat habitat outside the project
area, various curtailment regimes for
turbines during prime activity or
migration periods, and postconstruction monitoring for fatalities.
Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
Santa Fe, New Mexico, thirty (30)
calendar days from the date of this
publication.
Environmental Review
The Service will conduct an
environmental review to analyze
various alternatives for implementing
the proposed action and the associated
impacts of each. The draft EIS will be
the basis for the impact evaluation for
Indiana bats and the range of
alternatives to be addressed. The draft
EIS is expected to provide biological
descriptions of the affected species and
habitats, as well as the effects of the
alternatives on other resources such as
vegetation, wetlands, wildlife, geology
and soils, air quality, water resources,
water quality, cultural resources, land
use, recreation, water use, local
economy, and environmental justice.
Following completion of the
environmental review, the Service will
publish a notice of availability and a
request for comments on the draft EIS
and the applicant’s permit application,
which will include the draft HCP. The
draft EIS and draft HCP are expected to
be completed and available to the public
in mid-2010.
Authority
This notice is being furnished as
provided for by the NEPA Regulations
(40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22). The intent
of the notice is to obtain suggestions and
additional information from other
agencies and the public on the scope of
issues to be considered. Comments and
participation in this scoping process are
solicited.
Dated: May 13, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling, MN.
[FR Doc. 2010–12668 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
[LLNM915000L14200000.BJ0000]
Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey, New
Mexico
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of filing of plats of
survey.
The plats of survey described
below are scheduled to be officially
filed in the New Mexico State Office,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
These plats will be available for
inspection in the New Mexico State
Office, Bureau of Land Management,
301 Dinosaur Trail, Santa Fe, New
Mexico. Copies may be obtained from
this office upon payment. Contact
Marcella Montoya at 505–954–2097, or
by e-mail at
Marcella_Montoya@nm.blm.gov, for
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
New Mexico Principal Meridian, New
Mexico (NM)
The plat, in four sheets, representing the
dependent resurvey and survey in Township
13 North, Range 4 East, of the New Mexico
Principal Meridian, accepted March 21, 2010,
for Group 1094 NM.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey in Township 29 North,
Range 11 West, of the New Mexico Principal
Meridian, accepted April 16, 2010, for Group
1101 NM.
The plat, in two sheets, representing the
dependent resurvey and survey in Township
25 North, Range 10 West, of the New Mexico
Principal Meridian, accepted April 13, 2010,
for Group 1085 NM.
The plat, representing the dependent
resurvey and survey, in Township 3 North,
Range 7 West, of the New Mexico Principal
Meridian, accepted April 20, 2010, for Group
1089 NM.
Indian Meridian, Oklahoma (OK)
The plat, in two sheets, representing the
dependent resurvey and survey in Township
19 North, Range 8 East, of the Indian
Meridian, accepted October 13, 2009, for
Group 157 OK.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey in Township 28 North,
Range 23 East, of the Indian Meridian,
accepted March 18, 2010, for Group 183 OK.
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey in Township 19 North,
Range 22 East, of the Indian Meridian,
accepted April 28, 2010, for Group 178 OK.
The plat, in eighteen sheets, representing
the dependent resurvey and survey in
Township 10 North, Range 25 East, of the
Indian Meridian, accepted April 30, 2010, for
Group 61 OK.
Polk County, Texas (TX)
The plat representing the dependent
resurvey and survey of the AlabamaCoushatta Indian Reservation, accepted April
8, 2010, for Group 5 TX.
If a protest against a survey, as shown
on any of the above plats, is received
prior to the date of official filing, the
filing will be stayed pending
consideration of the protest. A plat will
not be officially filed until the day after
all protests have been dismissed and
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29577
become final or appeals from the
dismissal affirmed.
A person or party who wishes to
protest against any of these surveys
must file a written protest with the New
Mexico State Director, Bureau of Land
Management, stating that they wish to
protest.
A statement of reasons for a protest
may be filed with the notice of protest
to the State Director or the statement of
reasons must be filed with the State
Director within thirty (30) days after the
protest is filed.
Robert A. Casias,
Chief, Branch of Cadastral, Survey/
GeoSciences.
[FR Doc. 2010–12672 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–FB–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Rate Adjustments for Indian Irrigation
Projects
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Rate Adjustments.
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) owns, or has an interest in,
irrigation projects located on or
associated with various Indian
reservations throughout the United
States. We are required to establish
irrigation assessment rates to recover the
costs to administer, operate, maintain,
and rehabilitate these projects. We are
notifying you that we have adjusted the
irrigation assessment rates at several of
our irrigation projects and facilities to
reflect current costs of administration,
operation, maintenance, and
rehabilitation.
DATES: Effective Date: The irrigation
assessment rates shown in the tables as
final are effective as of January 1, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
details about a particular BIA irrigation
project or facility, please use the tables
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section to contact the regional or local
office where the project or facility is
located.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Effect of this Notice
II. Responses to Comments on Proposed Rate
Adjustments
III. Further Information on This Notice
IV. Administrative Requirements
I. Effect of This Notice
Does this notice affect me?
This notice affects you if you own or
lease land within the assessable acreage
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29575-29577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12668]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-ES-2010-N094; 30120-1113-000-F6]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Indiana Bat;
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement for
a Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a draft environmental impact
statement and draft habitat conservation plan; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) intend to
prepare a draft environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the
impacts of several alternatives relating to the proposed issuance of an
Endangered Species Act Permit to EverPower Wind Holdings, Inc., its
subsidiary Buckeye Wind LLC, and its affiliates (applicant) for
incidental take of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), a Federal
endangered species, from activities associated with the construction
and operation of a wind power project in Champaign County, Ohio. We
also announce a public comment period.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
June 25, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Ms. Megan Seymour, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ohio Field Office, 4625 Morse Rd., Suite 104,
Columbus, OH 43230;
E-mail comments: EverPowerHCP@fws.gov; or
Fax: (614) 416-8994 (Attention: Megan Seymour).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Megan Seymour, at (614) 416-8993,
extension 16. Individuals who are hearing-impaired or speech-impaired
may call the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8337 for TTY
assistance.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We publish this notice in compliance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), and its implementing regulations (40 CFR 1506.6),
and section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended
(Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We intend to gather the information
necessary to determine impacts and alternatives to support a decision
regarding the potential issuance of an incidental take permit to the
applicant, and the implementation of the supporting draft HCP. We
intend to prepare an EIS to evaluate the impacts of several
alternatives relating to the proposed issuance of an incidental take
permit under the Act. The applicant proposes to apply for an incidental
take permit through development and implementation of an HCP. The
proposed HCP will cover take of the Indiana bat that is incidental to
activities associated with the construction and operation of the
applicant's Buckeye Wind Energy project and will include measures
necessary to minimize and mitigate impacts to the Indiana bat and its
habitat to the maximum extent practicable.
Public Comments
We request data, comments, new information, or suggestions from the
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific
community, Tribes, industry, or any other interested party on this
notice. These comments will be considered by the Service in developing
a draft EIS and in the development of an HCP and ITP. We particularly
seek comments concerning:
(1) Biological information concerning the Indiana bat;
(2) Relevant data concerning wind power and bat interactions;
(3) Additional information concerning the range, distribution,
population size, and population trends of the Indiana bat;
(4) Current or planned activities in the subject area and their
possible impacts on the Indiana bat;
(5) The presence of archeological sites, buildings and structures,
historic events, sacred and traditional areas, and other historic
preservation concerns, which are required to be considered in project
planning by the National Historic Preservation Act; and
(6) Identification of any other environmental issues that should be
considered with regard to the proposed development and permit action.
You may submit your comments and materials considering this notice
by one of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. If you
previously submitted comments on this project during the public comment
period associated with Federal Register notice 75 FR 4840 (published
January 29, 2010), you need not resubmit your comments. All previously
received comments on this project will be considered in development of
the draft EIS.
Comments and materials we receive, as well as supporting
documentation we use in preparing the NEPA document, will be available
for public inspection by appointment, during normal business hours, at
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ohio Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section). You may obtain copies of this notice on
the Internet at: https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/permits/hcp/r3hcps.html, or by mail from the Ohio Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section).
Background
Section 9 of the Act prohibits ``taking'' of fish and wildlife
species listed as endangered under section 4 of the Act. The Act's
implementing regulations extend, under certain circumstances, the
prohibition of take to threatened species. Under section 3 of the Act,
the term ``take'' means ``to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound,
kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such
conduct.'' The term ``harm'' is defined by regulation as ``an act which
actually kills or injures wildlife. Such act may include significant
habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures
wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns,
including breeding, feeding, or sheltering'' (50 CFR 17.3). The term
``harass'' is defined in the regulations as ``an intentional or
negligent act or omission which creates the likelihood of injury to
wildlife by annoying it to such an extent as to significantly disrupt
normal behavioral patterns which include, but are not limited to,
breeding, feeding, or sheltering'' (50 CFR 17.3). Section 10(a)(1)(B)
of the Act requires an applicant for an incidental take permit to
prepare an HCP that describes: (1) The impact that will result from
such taking; (2) the steps the applicant will take to minimize and
mitigate that take to the maximum extent practicable, and the funding
that will be available to implement such steps; (3) the
[[Page 29576]]
alternative actions to such taking that the applicant considered and
the reasons why such alternatives are not being utilized; and (4) the
other measures that the Service may require as being necessary or
appropriate for the purposes of the plan. The Act requires the Service
to issue an incidental take permit to an applicant when we determine
that: (1) The taking will be incidental to otherwise lawful activities;
(2) the applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize and
mitigate the impacts of such taking; (3) the applicant has ensured that
adequate funding for the plan will be provided; (4) the taking will not
appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the
species in the wild; and (5) the measures, if any, we require as
necessary or appropriate for the purposes of the plan will be met.
Regulations governing permits for endangered and threatened species are
at 50 CFR 17.22 and 17.32.
The Indiana bat was added to the list of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife and Plants on March 11, 1967 (32 FR 4001). It is currently
listed as an endangered species under the Act. The population decline
of this species is attributed to habitat loss and degradation of both
winter hibernation habitat and summer roosting habitat, human
disturbance during hibernation, and possibly pesticides. An additional
and emerging threat to Indiana bats is White-Nose Syndrome, a recently
discovered fungus (Geomyces destructans) that invades the skin of bats,
causing ulcers which may alter hibernation arousal patterns, and which
can cause emaciation. The range of the Indiana bat includes much of the
eastern United States, and Ohio is located within the core maternity
range of the bat. Winter habitat for the Indiana bat includes caves and
mines that support high humidity and cool but stable temperatures. In
the summer, Indiana bats roost under the loose bark of dead or dying
trees. During summer males roost alone or in small groups, while
females and their offspring roost in larger groups of up to 100 or
more. Indiana bats forage for insects in and along the edges of
forested areas and wooded stream corridors. Maternity colonies of
Indiana bats have recently been detected in Champaign County, Ohio,
though no Indiana bat hibernacula have been documented in this county.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is issuance of an incidental take permit for
the Indiana bat during construction and operation of the applicant's
Buckeye Wind Energy project. The proposed HCP, which must meet the
requirements in section 10(a)(2)(A) of the Act, would be developed and
implemented by the applicant.
The applicant is planning the development of a wind power project
in Champaign County, Ohio. The project would be spread across 80,370
acres within portions of Union, Wayne, Urbana, Salem, Rush, and Goshen
Townships. Development of the wind power project would include
installation of up to 100 wind turbines and associated collection
lines, access roads, utility lines, substations, operation and
maintenance facility buildings, and temporary staging areas and
concrete batch plants. The wind turbine hub height will be
approximately 100 meters (m), and the rotor diameter will be
approximately 100 m, for an approximate total height of 150 m at the
rotor apex. Installation of each individual turbine will temporarily
impact an area of approximately 2.9 acres, while the final footprint of
each turbine will be approximately 0.2 acres. Access roads to the
turbines will have a temporary width of up to 55 feet during
construction, and a permanent width of 16-20 feet. Despite the
relatively small acreage of land to be affected by the project, impacts
to wildlife, particularly birds and bats, are anticipated.
The project is located in a rural setting, with the landscape
primarily composed of agricultural properties. Woodlots are scattered
throughout the project area. Several small towns (Mutual and Cable)
occur within the project area, and individual homes and low-density
residential areas are also scattered throughout.
The applicant, in conjunction with the Service, has determined that
take of Indiana bats is likely to occur from development of the
proposed wind power project. To authorize take, the applicant plans to
develop an HCP and request issuance of an ITP from the Service.
Alternatives
Three action alternatives relating to the proposed issuance of an
ITP to the applicant for activities associated with the construction
and operation of the wind power project will be considered in the draft
EIS, along with the potential impacts associated with each alternative.
Each action alternative analyzed in the draft EIS will be compared to
the No-Action alternative. The No-Action alternative represents
estimated future conditions to which the proposed action can be
compared.
No-Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, an Incidental Take Permit (ITP)
pursuant to Section 10 (a)(1)(B) of the Act would not be issued for
development of the Buckeye Wind Project. The proposed Buckeye Wind
Project and HCP would not occur without issuance of an ITP. According
to the applicant, the Action Area would be reconsidered and the
existing land uses would be maintained at the sites of proposed
turbines and other Facility appurtenances until and unless an ITP could
be secured. The proposed project purpose and need would not be met
under the No Action Alternative.
Maximally Restricted Operations Alternative
Under the Maximally Restricted Operations Alternative, the Facility
would be constructed as described under Proposed Action--i.e., full
build-out of up to 100 turbines. Minimization for potential impacts to
Indiana bats would include shutting down turbines at night during the
period from April 1 through October 31, the active period for Indiana
bats, every year the Buckeye Wind Project is in operation.
Modified Operations Alternative
Under the Modified Operations Alternative, the Facility would be
constructed as described under Proposed Action, i.e. full build-out of
up to 100 turbines. Minimization for potential impacts to Indiana bats
would include curtailment of turbines based on the habitat suitability
for Indiana bats at each proposed turbine location. Habitat suitability
will be determined based on habitat conditions at 43 roost locations
and 1,124 foraging locations derived from radio telemetry data from 21
Indiana bats that were captured during mist-netting activity in 2008
and 2009 in Champaign, Logan, and Hardin Counties.
Non-Restricted Operations Alternative
Under the Non-Restricted Operations Alternative, the Facility would
be constructed as described under Proposed Action--i.e., full build-out
of up to 100 turbines. No operational minimization for potential
impacts to Indiana bats would occur.
Any preferred alternative developed by the Service is likely to
contain various measures to avoid and minimize impacts to Indiana bats,
including the impact of lethal take. Various methods that may be
considered include, but are not limited to: Protection of roost trees
and surrounding habitat, set-back distances from known roost trees,
mapping and avoidance of foraging
[[Page 29577]]
areas, protection and enhancement of Indiana bat habitat outside the
project area, various curtailment regimes for turbines during prime
activity or migration periods, and post-construction monitoring for
fatalities.
Environmental Review
The Service will conduct an environmental review to analyze various
alternatives for implementing the proposed action and the associated
impacts of each. The draft EIS will be the basis for the impact
evaluation for Indiana bats and the range of alternatives to be
addressed. The draft EIS is expected to provide biological descriptions
of the affected species and habitats, as well as the effects of the
alternatives on other resources such as vegetation, wetlands, wildlife,
geology and soils, air quality, water resources, water quality,
cultural resources, land use, recreation, water use, local economy, and
environmental justice. Following completion of the environmental
review, the Service will publish a notice of availability and a request
for comments on the draft EIS and the applicant's permit application,
which will include the draft HCP. The draft EIS and draft HCP are
expected to be completed and available to the public in mid-2010.
Authority
This notice is being furnished as provided for by the NEPA
Regulations (40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22). The intent of the notice is to
obtain suggestions and additional information from other agencies and
the public on the scope of issues to be considered. Comments and
participation in this scoping process are solicited.
Dated: May 13, 2010.
Lynn M. Lewis,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort
Snelling, MN.
[FR Doc. 2010-12668 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P