Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, Fairbanks, AK, 29582-29583 [2010-12629]
Download as PDF
29582
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
Takings (Executive Order 12630)
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
The Department has determined that
these rate adjustments do not have
significant ‘‘takings’’ implications. The
rate adjustments do not deprive the
public, state, or local governments of
rights or property.
Fish and Wildlife Service
Federalism (Executive Order 13132)
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of
decision.
The Department has determined that
these rate adjustments do not have
significant Federalism effects because
they will not affect the States, the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government.
Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order
12988)
In issuing this rule, the Department
has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section
3 of Executive Order 12988.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
National Environmental Policy Act
The Department has determined that
these rate adjustments do not constitute
a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment and that no detailed
statement is required under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370(d)).
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
Information Quality Act
In developing this notice, we did not
conduct or use a study, experiment, or
survey requiring peer review under the
Information Quality Act (Pub. L. 106–
554).
[FR Doc. 2010–12658 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:16 May 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge,
Fairbanks, AK
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision
(ROD) for the final environmental
impact statement (EIS) for a Proposed
Land Exchange in the Yukon Flats
National Wildlife Refuge (NWR,
Refuge). We completed a thorough
analysis of the environmental, social,
and economic considerations and
presented it in our final EIS, which we
released to the public on March 12,
2010.
DATES: The Regional Director of the
Alaska Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, signed the ROD on April 21,
2010.
You may view or obtain
copies of the ROD/final EIS on paper or
CD–ROM by any of the following
methods:
Web Site: Download a copy of the
document(s) at https://
yukonflatseis.ensr.com.
E-mail: yukonflats_planning@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Yukon Flats ROD’’ in the
subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Laura Greffenius, EIS
Project Coordinator, (907) 786–3965.
Mail: Laura Greffenius, EIS Project
Coordinator, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS–231,
Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call
Laura Greffenius, EIS Project
Coordinator at (907) 786–3872 to make
an appointment during regular business
hours at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1011 East Tudor Rd., MS–231,
Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laura Greffenius, EIS Project
Coordinator, phone (907) 786–3872.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this
notice, we finalize the EIS process for a
Proposed Land Exchange in the Yukon
Flats NWR. In accordance with National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40
CFR 1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice
announces the availability of the ROD
for the final EIS for a Proposed Land
Exchange in the Yukon Flats NWR. We
completed a thorough analysis of the
environmental, social, and economic
ADDRESSES:
These rate adjustments do not affect
the collections of information which
have been approved by the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget,
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The OMB Control Number is
1076–0141 and expires December 31,
2012.
Dated: May 17, 2010.
Larry Echo Hawk,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FWS–R7–R–2010–N082; 70133–1265–0000–
U4]
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
considerations, which we included in
the final EIS. The ROD documents our
selection of the No Land Exchange
Alternative (No Action Alternative), the
Service’s preferred alternative in the
final EIS. Under this alternative the
Service would not exchange land with
Doyon, Limited (Doyon). The No Land
Exchange Alternative, as we described
in the final EIS/ROD, is the decision to
continue to manage lands within the
Refuge as they currently are.
Background Information
The Final EIS analyzes the potential
direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
associated with the Service’s proposed
‘‘Agreement in Principle’’ (Agreement)
between the Service and Doyon to
exchange and acquire lands within the
Refuge. Under the terms of the
Agreement, the proposed land exchange
involved 110,000 acres of Refuge lands
that may hold developable oil and gas
reserves, and oil and gas rights to an
adjacent 97,000 acres of Refuge lands.
Under the Proposed Action, the Refuge
would have received a minimum of
150,000 acres of Doyon lands within the
Refuge boundaries, and Doyon would
have reallocated 56,500 acres of Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act 12(b) land
entitlements within the Refuge to lands
outside the Refuge.
Alternatives
Alternatives analyzed in the Final EIS
included the No Land Exchange (No
Action) Alternative, or continuation of
present management. The No Action
Alternative was the Service’s preferred
alternative. In addition, three action
alternatives were evaluated: (1) The
Proposed Action, with land exchanges
and acquisitions as described in the
Agreement; (2) A Land Exchange with
Non-development Easements
Alternative, where Doyon would grant
non-development easements on 120,000
acres, but would not sell land to the
Service; and (3) A Land Exchange
Excluding the White-Crazy Mountains
Alternative that would exclude from the
exchange an area within the Refuge that
had been recommended for Wilderness
designation.
Among the alternatives evaluated, the
No Land Exchange Alternative is the
environmentally preferable alternative.
It has the least potential for adverse
effects to the biological and physical
environment of the Refuge, it best
protects and preserves the Refuge’s
resources, and it best supports the
purposes for which the Refuge was
established.
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 26, 2010 / Notices
Public Involvement
Public involvement and comments
have been requested, considered, and
incorporated throughout the EIS
process. The Notice of Intent to prepare
an EIS for a proposed land exchange in
the Refuge was published in the Federal
Register on October 19, 2005 (70 FR
60845). The notice of public scoping
meetings was published in the Federal
Register on March 3, 2006 (71 FR
10988). Public scoping meetings were
held in local communities within the
Refuge and surrounding areas. The
Service distributed newsletters with
project updates discussing opportunities
for public involvement and results of
public input. Comments and concerns
received during this time were used to
identify issues and draft alternatives for
evaluation in the Draft EIS.
The Notice of Availability for the
Draft EIS was published in the Federal
Register on January 25, 2008 (73 FR
4617). Public hearings were held in each
local community affiliated with the
Refuge, plus Fairbanks and Anchorage.
From May to July 2008, government-togovernment consultations were also
held with Tribal Councils who
requested them. In response to
numerous requests for additional time
to review and comment, the comment
period was reopened and extended via
a Federal Register notice published
April 18, 2008 (73 FR 20931). We
received more than 100,000 comments
during the full comment period. The
vast majority of comments, including
those from several area tribal
governments, opposed the proposed
exchange. The Responses to Comments
are contained in Volume 2 of the Final
EIS.
The Notice of Availability for the
Final EIS was published in the Federal
Register on March 12, 2010 (75 FR
11905). Comments from tribal
governments, Alaska Native and
conservation organizations, and
individuals expressed support for the
Service’s designation of the No Action
Alternative as the preferred alternative.
wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1
In making its decision, the Service
reviewed and carefully considered the
impacts identified in the draft and final
Environmental Impact Statement;
relevant issues and concerns; public
input received throughout the EIS
process, including comments on the
draft and final Environmental Impact
Statement; and other factors including
refuge purposes and relevant laws,
regulations, and policies. For the
following reasons, the Service selected
the No Land Exchange Alternative.
15:16 May 25, 2010
Jkt 220001
Dated: May 19, 2010.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2010–12629 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Special Resource Study and
Environmental Impact Statement,
Coltsville, Hartford, CT
AGENCY: National Park Service,
Department of the Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Termination of the
Environmental Impact Statement for the
Coltsville Special Resource Study in
Hartford, Connecticut.
As directed by the US
Congress in Public Law 108–94, the
National Park Service (NPS) undertook
a special resource study (SRS) of the
Coltsville Historic District in Hartford,
Connecticut. In accordance with NPS
policy, the Coltsville SRS was initially
undertaken as an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) process in compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA). A
Notice of Intent to Prepare an EIS was
published in the Federal Register on
September 4, 2004. The purpose of an
SRS is to determine the degree and kind
SUMMARY:
Findings and Basis for Decision
VerDate Mar<15>2010
First, the Service has a limited
understanding of the effects that oil and
gas development would have on the
hydrology of lands exchanged to Doyon
and lands that would be retained by the
Service. Second, the exchange would
create a private lands corridor that
would almost split the Refuge into two
parcels, resulting in habitat
fragmentation, and that could degrade
the biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health of the Refuge.
Third, the Service is concerned that the
proposed land exchange could magnify
projected changes to Refuge resources
from climate change. Fourth,
infrastructure associated with access
corridors from the proposed exchange
would increase human use of the
Refuge. Fifth, there is concern that the
lands proposed for acquisition by the
Service are more likely to be adjacent to
prospective areas of development (based
on revised U.S. Geological Survey oil
and gas data). Impacts from adjacent
development would make those lands
less desirable to the Service. This has
cast doubts on the benefits of the
exchange to all involved. The adoption
of the No Land Exchange Alternative is
effective immediately.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29583
of federal actions that may be desirable
for the management and protection of an
area considered to have potential for
addition to the national park system.
The EIS assesses the impacts of the
management alternatives examined in
the SRS.
The SRS examines a site in terms of:
• National significance of the
resources;
• Determination of suitability of the
site for inclusion within the national
park system in comparison to other
protected sites with similar resources or
themes;
• Determination of feasibility for the
NPS to own, manage or participate in
conservation and interpretation in the
study area;
• Need for NPS management
measured against other alternatives.
This SRS examined the resources in
the existing Coltsville Historic District,
which preserves the history of precision
manufacturing that developed at the
Colt Fire Arms Company. All of the
elements of the site are located within
the City of Hartford, Connecticut. The
study team concluded that the Coltsville
Historic District NHL meets the criteria
for national significance and suitability;
however, the study concluded that the
site does not meet the feasibility
criterion for potential designation as a
unit of the national park system. As a
result, there is no need for NPS
management and, therefore, no federal
actions subject to the requirements of
NEPA. Thus, the NEPA process has
been terminated.
The Coltsville Special Resource Study
is available for public review at:
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/nero.
Public comments were received
between November 13 and December
18, 2009. A summary of the public
comments is also available at https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/nero.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James O’Connell, Project Manager,
National Park Service, Northeast Region,
15 State Street, Boston, MA 02109.
Michael T. Reynolds,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region,
National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2010–12604 Filed 5–25–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree
Under Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act
Under 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby
given that on May 17, 2010, a proposed
E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM
26MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29582-29583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12629]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R7-R-2010-N082; 70133-1265-0000-U4]
Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, Fairbanks, AK
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability: record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of the record of decision (ROD) for the final
environmental impact statement (EIS) for a Proposed Land Exchange in
the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge (NWR, Refuge). We completed a
thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and economic
considerations and presented it in our final EIS, which we released to
the public on March 12, 2010.
DATES: The Regional Director of the Alaska Region, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, signed the ROD on April 21, 2010.
ADDRESSES: You may view or obtain copies of the ROD/final EIS on paper
or CD-ROM by any of the following methods:
Web Site: Download a copy of the document(s) at https://yukonflatseis.ensr.com.
E-mail: yukonflats_planning@fws.gov. Include ``Yukon Flats ROD''
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attn: Laura Greffenius, EIS Project Coordinator, (907) 786-
3965.
Mail: Laura Greffenius, EIS Project Coordinator, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS-231, Anchorage, AK 99503.
In-Person Viewing or Pickup: Call Laura Greffenius, EIS Project
Coordinator at (907) 786-3872 to make an appointment during regular
business hours at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 East Tudor Rd.,
MS-231, Anchorage, AK 99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Greffenius, EIS Project
Coordinator, phone (907) 786-3872.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this notice, we finalize the EIS
process for a Proposed Land Exchange in the Yukon Flats NWR. In
accordance with National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (40 CFR
1506.6(b)) requirements, this notice announces the availability of the
ROD for the final EIS for a Proposed Land Exchange in the Yukon Flats
NWR. We completed a thorough analysis of the environmental, social, and
economic considerations, which we included in the final EIS. The ROD
documents our selection of the No Land Exchange Alternative (No Action
Alternative), the Service's preferred alternative in the final EIS.
Under this alternative the Service would not exchange land with Doyon,
Limited (Doyon). The No Land Exchange Alternative, as we described in
the final EIS/ROD, is the decision to continue to manage lands within
the Refuge as they currently are.
Background Information
The Final EIS analyzes the potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts associated with the Service's proposed ``Agreement
in Principle'' (Agreement) between the Service and Doyon to exchange
and acquire lands within the Refuge. Under the terms of the Agreement,
the proposed land exchange involved 110,000 acres of Refuge lands that
may hold developable oil and gas reserves, and oil and gas rights to an
adjacent 97,000 acres of Refuge lands. Under the Proposed Action, the
Refuge would have received a minimum of 150,000 acres of Doyon lands
within the Refuge boundaries, and Doyon would have reallocated 56,500
acres of Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 12(b) land entitlements
within the Refuge to lands outside the Refuge.
Alternatives
Alternatives analyzed in the Final EIS included the No Land
Exchange (No Action) Alternative, or continuation of present
management. The No Action Alternative was the Service's preferred
alternative. In addition, three action alternatives were evaluated: (1)
The Proposed Action, with land exchanges and acquisitions as described
in the Agreement; (2) A Land Exchange with Non-development Easements
Alternative, where Doyon would grant non-development easements on
120,000 acres, but would not sell land to the Service; and (3) A Land
Exchange Excluding the White-Crazy Mountains Alternative that would
exclude from the exchange an area within the Refuge that had been
recommended for Wilderness designation.
Among the alternatives evaluated, the No Land Exchange Alternative
is the environmentally preferable alternative. It has the least
potential for adverse effects to the biological and physical
environment of the Refuge, it best protects and preserves the Refuge's
resources, and it best supports the purposes for which the Refuge was
established.
[[Page 29583]]
Public Involvement
Public involvement and comments have been requested, considered,
and incorporated throughout the EIS process. The Notice of Intent to
prepare an EIS for a proposed land exchange in the Refuge was published
in the Federal Register on October 19, 2005 (70 FR 60845). The notice
of public scoping meetings was published in the Federal Register on
March 3, 2006 (71 FR 10988). Public scoping meetings were held in local
communities within the Refuge and surrounding areas. The Service
distributed newsletters with project updates discussing opportunities
for public involvement and results of public input. Comments and
concerns received during this time were used to identify issues and
draft alternatives for evaluation in the Draft EIS.
The Notice of Availability for the Draft EIS was published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 2008 (73 FR 4617). Public hearings were
held in each local community affiliated with the Refuge, plus Fairbanks
and Anchorage. From May to July 2008, government-to-government
consultations were also held with Tribal Councils who requested them.
In response to numerous requests for additional time to review and
comment, the comment period was reopened and extended via a Federal
Register notice published April 18, 2008 (73 FR 20931). We received
more than 100,000 comments during the full comment period. The vast
majority of comments, including those from several area tribal
governments, opposed the proposed exchange. The Responses to Comments
are contained in Volume 2 of the Final EIS.
The Notice of Availability for the Final EIS was published in the
Federal Register on March 12, 2010 (75 FR 11905). Comments from tribal
governments, Alaska Native and conservation organizations, and
individuals expressed support for the Service's designation of the No
Action Alternative as the preferred alternative.
Findings and Basis for Decision
In making its decision, the Service reviewed and carefully
considered the impacts identified in the draft and final Environmental
Impact Statement; relevant issues and concerns; public input received
throughout the EIS process, including comments on the draft and final
Environmental Impact Statement; and other factors including refuge
purposes and relevant laws, regulations, and policies. For the
following reasons, the Service selected the No Land Exchange
Alternative.
First, the Service has a limited understanding of the effects that
oil and gas development would have on the hydrology of lands exchanged
to Doyon and lands that would be retained by the Service. Second, the
exchange would create a private lands corridor that would almost split
the Refuge into two parcels, resulting in habitat fragmentation, and
that could degrade the biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health of the Refuge. Third, the Service is concerned
that the proposed land exchange could magnify projected changes to
Refuge resources from climate change. Fourth, infrastructure associated
with access corridors from the proposed exchange would increase human
use of the Refuge. Fifth, there is concern that the lands proposed for
acquisition by the Service are more likely to be adjacent to
prospective areas of development (based on revised U.S. Geological
Survey oil and gas data). Impacts from adjacent development would make
those lands less desirable to the Service. This has cast doubts on the
benefits of the exchange to all involved. The adoption of the No Land
Exchange Alternative is effective immediately.
Dated: May 19, 2010.
Geoffrey L. Haskett,
Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
[FR Doc. 2010-12629 Filed 5-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P