Notice of Public Hearings of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Basing the U.S. Marine Corps Joint Strike Fighter F-35B on the West Coast, 29323-29324 [2010-12525]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices
Dated: May 20, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2010–12522 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings of the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
Basing the U.S. Marine Corps Joint
Strike Fighter F–35B on the West
Coast
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section (102)(2)(c)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969, and regulations
implemented by the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] parts 1500–
1508), Department of Navy (DoN) NEPA
regulations (32 CFR part 775), and U.S.
Marine Corps (USMC) NEPA directives
(Marine Corps Order P5090.2A, changes
1 and 2), DoN has prepared and filed
with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) a Draft Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) that evaluates
the potential environmental
consequences that may result from the
basing of the F–35B Joint Strike Fighter
(JSF) on the West Coast of the United
States.
With the filing of the Draft EIS, DoN
is initiating a 46-day public comment
period and has scheduled two public
comment meetings to receive oral and
written comments on the Draft EIS.
Federal, State and local agencies, and
interested parties are encouraged to
provide comments in person at any of
the public comment meetings, or in
writing anytime during the public
comment period. This notice announces
the date and location of the public
meetings and provides supplementary
information about the environmental
planning effort.
DATES: The Draft EIS public review
period will begin May 21, 2010, and end
on July 6, 2010. Each of the two public
meetings will be conducted as an
informational open house. Individuals
will have the opportunity to review the
information presented in the Draft EIS.
Marine Corps and Navy representatives
will be available to clarify information
related to the Draft EIS. Public comment
meetings will be held:
(1) June 15, 2010, 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., at
Scripps-Miramar Ranch Library
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Miramar, 10301 Scripps Lake Drive, San
Diego, CA.
(2) June 17, 2010, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., at
Gila Vista Junior High School, 2245 S.
Arizona Ave., Yuma, AZ.
Attendees will be able to submit
written comments at the public
meetings. A stenographer will be
present to transcribe oral comments;
however, to ensure the accuracy of the
record, all statements should be
submitted in writing. Equal weight will
be given to oral and written statements.
All statements, oral transcription and
written, submitted during the public
review period will become part of the
public record on the Draft EIS and will
be responded to in the Final EIS.
Comments may also be submitted by
regular U.S. mail or electronically as
described below.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Draft EIS is
available at the project Web site,
https://www.usmcjsfwest.com, and at the
local libraries identified at the end of
this notice. Comments on the Draft EIS
can be submitted via the project Web
site, or submitted in writing to: Naval
Facilities Engineering Command
Southwest, Attn: JSF EIS Project
Manager, 1220 Pacific Highway, San
Diego, California 92132–5190. Mailed
comments must be postmarked by July
6, 2010, and electronic comments must
be submitted on or before July 6, 2010,
to be considered in this environmental
review process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Adrianne Saboya, Environmental
Planner, Central Integrated Product
Team at telephone: 619–532–4742, by
fax: 619–532–4160 or write to Naval
Facilities Engineering Command
Southwest, Attn: Ms. Adrianne Saboya,
1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego,
California 92132–5190.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice
of Intent (NOI) for the EIS was
published in the Federal Register on
January 19, 2009 (Vol. 74, No. 10, p.
2515).
Proposed Action
The proposed action would base up to
11 operational F–35B squadrons and 1
Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E)
squadron (184 aircraft) on the West
Coast, and would replace eight F/A–18
squadrons (126 aircraft) and four AV–8B
squadrons (56 aircraft) currently
authorized for basing on the West Coast.
The proposed action also includes
construction and/or renovation of
airfield facilities necessary to
accommodate and maintain the F–35B
squadrons, including construction of an
auxiliary landing field on the Barry M.
Goldwater Range West in Arizona;
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29323
changes to personnel in support of
basing; and conducting F–35B training
and readiness operations in existing
airspace and on existing ranges to
ensure pilots attain and maintain
combat ready status. The eight F/A–18
squadrons to be replaced are currently
authorized for basing at Marine Corps
Air Station (MCAS) Miramar. The four
AV–8B squadrons are based at MCAS
Yuma.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the Proposed Action
is to efficiently and effectively maintain
combat capability and mission readiness
as the Marine Corps faces increased
deployments across a spectrum of
conflicts, and a corresponding increased
difficulty in maintaining an aging legacy
aircraft inventory. The need for the
proposed action is to replace aging
legacy aircraft and integrate the
operational and OT&E F–35B squadrons
into the existing Marine Corps
command and organizational structure.
This action would also ensure that the
Marine Corps’ aircrews benefit from the
aircraft’s major technological
improvements and enhanced training
and readiness requirements.
Alternatives Considered in the Draft
EIS
The proposed F–35B squadrons
would be split between two aviation
facilities. Evaluations were made of the
following five split-basing alternatives.
• Alternative 1 (Preferred)—Six
operational squadrons at MCAS
Miramar in San Diego County,
California, and five operational
squadrons plus one OT&E squadron at
MCAS Yuma in southwestern Arizona.
• Alternative 2—Four operational
squadrons at MCAS Miramar and seven
operational squadrons plus one OT&E
squadron at MCAS Yuma.
• Alternative 3—Seven operational
squadrons plus one OT&E squadron at
MCAS Miramar and four operational
squadrons at MCAS Yuma.
• Alternative 4—One operational
squadron plus one OT&E squadron at
MCAS Miramar and ten operational
squadrons at MCAS YUMA.
• Alternative 5—Ten operational
squadrons at MCAS Miramar and one
operational squadron plus one OT&E
squadron at MCAS Yuma.
Under all basing alternatives, MCAS
Miramar would lose eight F/A–18
squadrons and MCAS Yuma would lose
four AV–8B squadrons. Construction of
an auxiliary landing field within the
Barry M. Goldwater Range West, as well
as operations within the Bob Stump
Training Range Complex and Barry M.
Goldwater Range East are included as
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
29324
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices
part of each basing alternative. A sixth
alternative, No Action, assumes no
aircraft would be replaced, aircraft
operations would continue at the
current level, and no infrastructure
improvements or personnel changes
related to basing the F–35B aircraft on
the West Coast would occur.
Potential impacts were evaluated in
the Draft EIS under all alternatives for
the following resources: airfields and
airspace; noise; air quality; safety and
environmental health; land use;
infrastructure and utilities;
socioeconomics; community facilities
and services; ground traffic and
transportation; environmental justice;
hazardous materials management;
biological resources; topography,
geology and soils; water resources; and
cultural and traditional resources.
The preferred alternative would result
in a reduction of 30 aircraft and 635
military personnel at MCAS Miramar
and an increase of 32 aircraft and 491
military personnel at MCAS Yuma. New
support facilities at MCAS Miramar
would include two new hangars,
helipad and apron expansion, wash
racks and rinse facilities, a simulator
facility, and a runway upgrade. New
support facilities at MCAS Yuma would
include four new hangars, modifications
to an existing hangar, new wash racks,
runway upgrades, enlisted quarters and
dining facility, a simulator facility, new
parking apron, and other minor
infrastructure improvements.
Environmental consequences of the
proposed action would principally arise
from construction; impacts from
operation of the F–35B would be
relatively minor. The Draft EIS
enumerates an array of conservation and
construction measures and features of
project design and planning that would
avoid and minimize most potential
impacts. The proposed action would
fully comply with regulatory
requirements for the protection of
environmental resources.
Unavoidable impacts of implementing
the preferred alternative include
construction impacts on biological
resources at MCAS Miramar, especially
one threatened (Coastal California
Gnatcatcher) and one endangered
species (San Diego Fairy Shrimp), and
loss of 0.05 acres of vernal pool habitat.
Construction of an auxiliary landing
field at the Barry M. Goldwater Range
West would affect habitat for a species
(flat-tailed horned lizard) proposed for
listing as threatened. A Biological
Assessment has been submitted to the
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in
compliance with Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
The other alternatives have similar
types and levels of impacts, with the
most extensive unavoidable impacts
occurring at MCAS Miramar under
Alternative 5 (10 operational squadrons
at MCAS Miramar, 1 operational and 1
OT&E squadron at MCAS Yuma) related
to the loss of an area supporting vernal
pool habitat and associated federally
listed species.
Schedule
The Notice of Availability publication
in the Federal Register and local print
media starts the 46-day public comment
period for the Draft EIS. DoN will
consider and respond to all written and
electronic comments, including e-mail,
submitted as described above in
preparing the Final EIS. DoN intends to
issue the Final EIS in September 2010,
at which time an NOA will be published
in the Federal Register and local print
media. A Record of Decision is expected
in December 2010. Copies of the Draft
EIS can be found on the project Web
site, https://www.usmcjsfwest.com or at
the following locations:
(1) San Diego County Public Library
Fallbrook Branch, 124 S. Mission Road,
Fallbrook, CA 92028, telephone: 760–
728–2373,
(2) San Diego Public Library Mira
Mesa Branch, 8405 New Salem Street,
San Diego, CA 92126, telephone: 858–
538–8165,
(3) Scripps-Miramar Ranch Library
Miramar, 10301 Scripps Lake Drive, San
Diego, CA 92131, telephone: 858–538–
8158,
(4) Yuma County Library Heritage
Branch (Main Library) 350 Third
Avenue, Yuma, AZ 85364, telephone:
928–782–1871.
Dated: May 18, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate
General’s Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–12525 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Preferred Supplier Program (PSP)
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice of proposed policy letter.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Navy, Acquisition and
Logistics Management (DASN (A&LM)),
is soliciting comments that the
Department of the Navy (DON) may use
in drafting a policy that will establish a
Preferred Supplier Program (PSP).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Under the PSP, contractors that have
demonstrated exemplary performance,
at the corporate level; in the areas of
cost, schedule, performance, quality,
and business relations would be granted
Preferred Supplier Status (PSS).
Contractors that achieved PSS would
receive more favorable contract terms
and conditions in DON contracts. Upon
approval of the policy by the Assistant
Secretary of the Navy for Research,
Development and Acquisition, DON
will initiate the pilot phase of the PSP.
DATES: DON invites interested parties
from both the public and private sectors
to provide comments to be considered
in the formulation of the final policy
letter. In particular, DON encourages
respondents to offer their views as
discussed below, in Section D,
‘‘Solicitation of Public Comment.’’
Interested parties should submit
comments, in writing, to the address
below, on or before July 15, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
E-mail: preferredsupplier@navy.mil.
Facsimile: 703–614–9394.
Mail: DASN (A&LM), ATTN: Clarence
Belton, 1000 Navy Pentagon, Room
BF992, Washington, DC 20350–1000.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite ‘‘Proposed DON PSP
Policy Letter’’ in all correspondence. All
comments received will be posted,
without change or redaction, to https://
www.regulations.gov, so commenters
should not include information that
they do not wish to be posted (for
example, personal or businessconfidential).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clarence Belton, 703–693–4006 or
clarence.belton@navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Companies in the private sector that
have implemented PSPs have
significantly improved performance.
Cash flow, profit, and contract terms
and conditions that reduce contractor
costs and risk are powerful incentives
that can be used to motivate contractors
to perform at a high level. DON and its
contractors negotiate these key
components of the business
arrangement contract by contract. As a
result of this decentralized and
individual approach, DON loses an
extremely important opportunity. This
policy would establish the PSP to
recover that opportunity through the use
of favorable contract terms and
conditions that would be available to
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29323-29324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12525]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Public Hearings of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for Basing the U.S. Marine Corps Joint Strike Fighter F-35B
on the West Coast
AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section (102)(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, and regulations implemented by the Council
on Environmental Quality (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] parts
1500-1508), Department of Navy (DoN) NEPA regulations (32 CFR part
775), and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) NEPA directives (Marine Corps Order
P5090.2A, changes 1 and 2), DoN has prepared and filed with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) that evaluates the potential environmental consequences
that may result from the basing of the F-35B Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
on the West Coast of the United States.
With the filing of the Draft EIS, DoN is initiating a 46-day public
comment period and has scheduled two public comment meetings to receive
oral and written comments on the Draft EIS. Federal, State and local
agencies, and interested parties are encouraged to provide comments in
person at any of the public comment meetings, or in writing anytime
during the public comment period. This notice announces the date and
location of the public meetings and provides supplementary information
about the environmental planning effort.
DATES: The Draft EIS public review period will begin May 21, 2010, and
end on July 6, 2010. Each of the two public meetings will be conducted
as an informational open house. Individuals will have the opportunity
to review the information presented in the Draft EIS. Marine Corps and
Navy representatives will be available to clarify information related
to the Draft EIS. Public comment meetings will be held:
(1) June 15, 2010, 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., at Scripps-Miramar Ranch
Library Miramar, 10301 Scripps Lake Drive, San Diego, CA.
(2) June 17, 2010, 4 p.m. to 7 p.m., at Gila Vista Junior High
School, 2245 S. Arizona Ave., Yuma, AZ.
Attendees will be able to submit written comments at the public
meetings. A stenographer will be present to transcribe oral comments;
however, to ensure the accuracy of the record, all statements should be
submitted in writing. Equal weight will be given to oral and written
statements. All statements, oral transcription and written, submitted
during the public review period will become part of the public record
on the Draft EIS and will be responded to in the Final EIS. Comments
may also be submitted by regular U.S. mail or electronically as
described below.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the Draft EIS is available at the project Web
site, https://www.usmcjsfwest.com, and at the local libraries identified
at the end of this notice. Comments on the Draft EIS can be submitted
via the project Web site, or submitted in writing to: Naval Facilities
Engineering Command Southwest, Attn: JSF EIS Project Manager, 1220
Pacific Highway, San Diego, California 92132-5190. Mailed comments must
be postmarked by July 6, 2010, and electronic comments must be
submitted on or before July 6, 2010, to be considered in this
environmental review process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adrianne Saboya, Environmental
Planner, Central Integrated Product Team at telephone: 619-532-4742, by
fax: 619-532-4160 or write to Naval Facilities Engineering Command
Southwest, Attn: Ms. Adrianne Saboya, 1220 Pacific Highway, San Diego,
California 92132-5190.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Intent (NOI) for the EIS was
published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2009 (Vol. 74, No. 10,
p. 2515).
Proposed Action
The proposed action would base up to 11 operational F-35B squadrons
and 1 Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) squadron (184 aircraft) on
the West Coast, and would replace eight F/A-18 squadrons (126 aircraft)
and four AV-8B squadrons (56 aircraft) currently authorized for basing
on the West Coast. The proposed action also includes construction and/
or renovation of airfield facilities necessary to accommodate and
maintain the F-35B squadrons, including construction of an auxiliary
landing field on the Barry M. Goldwater Range West in Arizona; changes
to personnel in support of basing; and conducting F-35B training and
readiness operations in existing airspace and on existing ranges to
ensure pilots attain and maintain combat ready status. The eight F/A-18
squadrons to be replaced are currently authorized for basing at Marine
Corps Air Station (MCAS) Miramar. The four AV-8B squadrons are based at
MCAS Yuma.
Purpose and Need
The purpose of the Proposed Action is to efficiently and
effectively maintain combat capability and mission readiness as the
Marine Corps faces increased deployments across a spectrum of
conflicts, and a corresponding increased difficulty in maintaining an
aging legacy aircraft inventory. The need for the proposed action is to
replace aging legacy aircraft and integrate the operational and OT&E F-
35B squadrons into the existing Marine Corps command and organizational
structure. This action would also ensure that the Marine Corps'
aircrews benefit from the aircraft's major technological improvements
and enhanced training and readiness requirements.
Alternatives Considered in the Draft EIS
The proposed F-35B squadrons would be split between two aviation
facilities. Evaluations were made of the following five split-basing
alternatives.
Alternative 1 (Preferred)--Six operational squadrons at
MCAS Miramar in San Diego County, California, and five operational
squadrons plus one OT&E squadron at MCAS Yuma in southwestern Arizona.
Alternative 2--Four operational squadrons at MCAS Miramar
and seven operational squadrons plus one OT&E squadron at MCAS Yuma.
Alternative 3--Seven operational squadrons plus one OT&E
squadron at MCAS Miramar and four operational squadrons at MCAS Yuma.
Alternative 4--One operational squadron plus one OT&E
squadron at MCAS Miramar and ten operational squadrons at MCAS YUMA.
Alternative 5--Ten operational squadrons at MCAS Miramar
and one operational squadron plus one OT&E squadron at MCAS Yuma.
Under all basing alternatives, MCAS Miramar would lose eight F/A-18
squadrons and MCAS Yuma would lose four AV-8B squadrons. Construction
of an auxiliary landing field within the Barry M. Goldwater Range West,
as well as operations within the Bob Stump Training Range Complex and
Barry M. Goldwater Range East are included as
[[Page 29324]]
part of each basing alternative. A sixth alternative, No Action,
assumes no aircraft would be replaced, aircraft operations would
continue at the current level, and no infrastructure improvements or
personnel changes related to basing the F-35B aircraft on the West
Coast would occur.
Potential impacts were evaluated in the Draft EIS under all
alternatives for the following resources: airfields and airspace;
noise; air quality; safety and environmental health; land use;
infrastructure and utilities; socioeconomics; community facilities and
services; ground traffic and transportation; environmental justice;
hazardous materials management; biological resources; topography,
geology and soils; water resources; and cultural and traditional
resources.
The preferred alternative would result in a reduction of 30
aircraft and 635 military personnel at MCAS Miramar and an increase of
32 aircraft and 491 military personnel at MCAS Yuma. New support
facilities at MCAS Miramar would include two new hangars, helipad and
apron expansion, wash racks and rinse facilities, a simulator facility,
and a runway upgrade. New support facilities at MCAS Yuma would include
four new hangars, modifications to an existing hangar, new wash racks,
runway upgrades, enlisted quarters and dining facility, a simulator
facility, new parking apron, and other minor infrastructure
improvements.
Environmental consequences of the proposed action would principally
arise from construction; impacts from operation of the F-35B would be
relatively minor. The Draft EIS enumerates an array of conservation and
construction measures and features of project design and planning that
would avoid and minimize most potential impacts. The proposed action
would fully comply with regulatory requirements for the protection of
environmental resources.
Unavoidable impacts of implementing the preferred alternative
include construction impacts on biological resources at MCAS Miramar,
especially one threatened (Coastal California Gnatcatcher) and one
endangered species (San Diego Fairy Shrimp), and loss of 0.05 acres of
vernal pool habitat. Construction of an auxiliary landing field at the
Barry M. Goldwater Range West would affect habitat for a species (flat-
tailed horned lizard) proposed for listing as threatened. A Biological
Assessment has been submitted to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in
compliance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act.
The other alternatives have similar types and levels of impacts,
with the most extensive unavoidable impacts occurring at MCAS Miramar
under Alternative 5 (10 operational squadrons at MCAS Miramar, 1
operational and 1 OT&E squadron at MCAS Yuma) related to the loss of an
area supporting vernal pool habitat and associated federally listed
species.
Schedule
The Notice of Availability publication in the Federal Register and
local print media starts the 46-day public comment period for the Draft
EIS. DoN will consider and respond to all written and electronic
comments, including e-mail, submitted as described above in preparing
the Final EIS. DoN intends to issue the Final EIS in September 2010, at
which time an NOA will be published in the Federal Register and local
print media. A Record of Decision is expected in December 2010. Copies
of the Draft EIS can be found on the project Web site, https://www.usmcjsfwest.com or at the following locations:
(1) San Diego County Public Library Fallbrook Branch, 124 S.
Mission Road, Fallbrook, CA 92028, telephone: 760-728-2373,
(2) San Diego Public Library Mira Mesa Branch, 8405 New Salem
Street, San Diego, CA 92126, telephone: 858-538-8165,
(3) Scripps-Miramar Ranch Library Miramar, 10301 Scripps Lake
Drive, San Diego, CA 92131, telephone: 858-538-8158,
(4) Yuma County Library Heritage Branch (Main Library) 350 Third
Avenue, Yuma, AZ 85364, telephone: 928-782-1871.
Dated: May 18, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingham,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-12525 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P