Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2); Availability, 29350-29352 [2010-12456]

Download as PDF 29350 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Project Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Surveillance System (HHLPSS)—New— National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description The overarching goal of the Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Surveillance System (HHLPSS) is to establish Healthy Homes Surveillance Systems at the state and national levels. Currently, 40 state and local Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Programs (CLPPP) report information (e.g., presence of lead paint, age of housing, and type of housing) to CDC via the National Blood Lead Surveillance System (NBLSS) (OMB No. 0920–0337, exp. 1/31/2012). The addition of a new panel of housing questions would help to provide a more comprehensive picture of housing stock in the United States and potentially modifiable risk factors. The objectives for developing this system are two-fold. First, the program would like to use surveillance data to estimate the extent of housing-related injuries and asthma. This is important because it will allow the program to systematically track the management and follow-up of those residents with these health outcomes. The next objective for the development of this system is to examine potential housing-related risk factors. Childhood lead poisoning is just one of many adverse health conditions that are related to common housing deficiencies. Multiple hazards in housing, e.g., mold, vermin, radon and the lack of safety devices, continue to adversely affect the health of residents. It is in the interest of public health to expand from a single focus on lead poisoning prevention to a coordinated, comprehensive, and systematic approach to eliminating multiple housing-related health hazards. HHLPSS builds upon previous efforts by the NBLSS. While the earlier NBLSS was focused on homes of children less than six years old, the new HHLPSS, upon approval, will replace the NBLSS and will enable flexibility to evaluate all homes, regardless of the presence of children < age 6 years. There is no cost to respondents other than their time. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE Respondents Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Average burden per response (in hrs.) Total burden hours State and Local Health Departments for Child Surveillance ........................... 40 4 4 640 ........................ ........................ ........................ 640 Total .......................................................................................................... Carol Walker, Acting Reports Clearance Officer,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–12538 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP): Miner Safety and Health Training—Western United States, Request for Application (RFA) OH10–001, Initial Review In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announces the aforementioned meeting: Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m., June 15, 2010 (Closed). Place: Hyatt Regency Pittsburgh International Airport, 1111 Airport Boulevard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15231. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5, U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of Public Law 92–463. Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to ‘‘Miner Safety and Health Training Program—Western United States, RFA OH10–001.’’ Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate. Contact Person For More Information: S. Price Connor, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E–74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone (404) 498–2511. The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. PO 00000 Dated: May 18, 2010. Elaine L. Baker, Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. 2010–12564 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2009–D–0260] Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2); Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM 25MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES ‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2).’’ The draft guidance provides information to the industry in complying with the Reportable Food Registry requirements prescribed by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). Further, the draft guidance addresses inquiries that the agency has received through its Reportable Food Registry help desk and/ or by other means since the implementation of the Reportable Food Registry on September 8, 2009, and provides information on the new Safety Reporting Portal. The agency is also seeking comments from industry on the Reportable Food Registry requirements, and specifically on the issue of ‘‘transfer’’ as discussed in the current Edition 1, and draft Edition 2 guidance. DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comments on the draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance, submit electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by July 26, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the Office of Food Defense, Communication and Emergency Response (HFS–005), Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in processing your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye Feldstein, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301– 436–2428. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On September 27, 2007, the President signed into law the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). This law amends the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) by creating a new section 417 (21 U.S.C. 350f), Reportable Food Registry. Section 417 of the act requires VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to establish within FDA a Reportable Food Registry. The congressionally-identified purpose of the Reportable Food Registry is to provide a ‘‘reliable mechanism to track patterns of adulteration in food [which] would support efforts by the Food and Drug Administration to target limited inspection resources to protect the public health’’ (Pubic Law 110–085, section 1005(a)(4)). The Secretary has delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs the responsibility for administering the act, including section 417. To further the development of the Reportable Food Registry, section 417 of the act requires FDA to establish an electronic portal by which instances of reportable food must be submitted to FDA by responsible parties and may be submitted by public health officials. After receipt of reports through the electronic portal, FDA is required to review and assess the information submitted for purposes of identifying reportable food, submitting entries to the Reportable Food Registry, issuing an alert or notification as FDA deems necessary, and exercising other existing food safety authorities under the act to protect the public health. The requirements under the Reportable Food Registry became effective on September 8, 2009. In the Federal Register of June 11, 2009, FDA announced the availability of a draft guidance entitled ‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007’’ and gave interested parties an opportunity to submit comments by July 27, 2009 (74 FR 27803). The agency reviewed and evaluated these comments and issued a final guidance on September 9, 2009 (74 FR 46434). This draft guidance is the second edition of that guidance entitled ‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2)’’ and responds to inquiries that the agency has received through its Reportable Food Registry help desk and/or by other means since the implementation of the Reportable Food Registry on September 8, 2009, and informs industry about the new Safety Reporting Portal. The Safety Reporting Portal is a joint FDA-National Institutes of Health (NIH) system that facilitates the process of reporting several categories of safety information to the FDA and the NIH. As of May 24, 2010, the Reportable Food electronic portal will be a part of the Safety Reporting Portal. PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 29351 This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA’s good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the agency’s current thinking on the topics discussed. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternate approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This guidance contains information collection provisions that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). The collections of information in this guidance were approved under OMB control numbers 0910–0643 and 0910–0645. This guidance also refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations. The collection of information in 21 CFR 7.46 has been approved under OMB control number 0910–0249. III. Request for Comments In addition, although the industry is encouraged to submit comments regarding any of the requirements under the Reportable Food Registry, the agency is seeking comments specifically with regard to the meaning of the word ‘‘transfer’’ as it appears in section 417(d)(2)(B) of the act. The meaning of the word ‘‘transfer’’ in this context was discussed in Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and Answer numbers 27 and 28, and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at Question and Answer numbers E.4 and E.5. Section 417(d)(2) of the act provides an exemption from the requirement that a responsible party submit a reportable food report. In order for the exemption to apply, the adulteration must have originated with the responsible party, the responsible party must have detected the adulteration ‘‘prior to any transfer to another person’’ of the article of food, and the responsible party must have corrected the adulteration or destroyed the food. However, Congress did not provide a definition for the term ‘‘transfer’’ as it is used in section 417(d)(2)(B) of the act. In Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and Answer numbers 27 and 28, and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at Question and Answer numbers E.4 and E.5, FDA said that a transfer to another person occurs when the responsible person releases the food to another person. In this document, FDA is asking for comment on whether this interpretation of the term ‘‘transfer’’ is appropriate, and if not, E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM 25MYN1 29352 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices what other interpretations of the term ‘‘transfer’’ as it is used in section 417(d)(B)(2) of the act would be more appropriate. Specifically, we are requesting comment on whether the interpretation of the term ‘‘transfer’’ should be dependent upon possession of the food, whether the interpretation should be dependent on ownership of the food, or whether there are other interpretations we should consider, such as a combination of possession and/or ownership. IV. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. V. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance at https:// www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https:// www.regulations.gov. Dated: May 19, 2010. David Dorsey, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget. [FR Doc. 2010–12456 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0241] Draft Guidance for Industry on Data Elements for Submission of Veterinary Adverse Event Reports to the Center for Veterinary Medicine; Availability AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry #188 entitled ‘‘Data Elements for Submission of Veterinary Adverse Event Reports to the Center for Veterinary Medicine.’’ The purpose of this draft guidance is to assist sponsors or non-applicants with filling out form FDA 1932, ‘‘Veterinary Adverse Drug Reaction, Lack of Effectiveness, Product VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:11 May 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 Defect Report,’’ as required by FDA regulations. DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance by August 9, 2010. ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the Communications Staff (HFV–12), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft guidance. Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA– 305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Post, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–210), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9191, email: Lynn.Post@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry #188 entitled ‘‘Data Elements for Submission of Veterinary Adverse Event Reports to the Center for Veterinary Medicine.’’ The purpose of this draft guidance is to assist sponsors or non-applicants with filling out Form FDA 1932, in both paper and electronic format. Section 512(l) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(l)) and § 514.80(b) (21 CFR 514.80(b)) require applicants of approved new animal drug applications (NADAs) and approved abbreviated new animal drug applications (ANADAs) to report adverse drug experiences and product/manufacturing defects. This continuous monitoring of approved NADAs and ANADAs affords the primary means by which FDA obtains information regarding potential problems with the safety and efficacy of marketed approved new animal drugs as well as potential product/manufacturing problems. Post-approval marketing surveillance is important because data previously submitted to FDA may no longer be adequate, as animal drug effects can change over time and less PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 apparent effects may take years to manifest. An applicant must report adverse drug experiences and product/ manufacturing defects on Form FDA 1932, ‘‘Veterinary Adverse Drug Reaction, Lack of Effectiveness, Product Defect Report.’’ II. Significance of Guidance This level 1 draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA’s good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the agency’s current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections of information in section 512(l) of the act and § 514.80 have been approved under OMB Control No. 0910–0645. IV. Comments Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. V. Electronic Access Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance at either https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/ default.htm or https:// www.regulations.gov. Dated: May 19, 2010. David Dorsey, Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget. [FR Doc. 2010–12454 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM 25MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29350-29352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12456]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0260]


Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the 
Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug 
Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2); Availability

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice of availability and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
availability of a draft guidance entitled

[[Page 29351]]

``Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as 
Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 
(Edition 2).'' The draft guidance provides information to the industry 
in complying with the Reportable Food Registry requirements prescribed 
by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). 
Further, the draft guidance addresses inquiries that the agency has 
received through its Reportable Food Registry help desk and/or by other 
means since the implementation of the Reportable Food Registry on 
September 8, 2009, and provides information on the new Safety Reporting 
Portal. The agency is also seeking comments from industry on the 
Reportable Food Registry requirements, and specifically on the issue of 
``transfer'' as discussed in the current Edition 1, and draft Edition 2 
guidance.

DATES:  Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comments on 
the draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the 
guidance, submit electronic or written comments on the draft guidance 
by July 26, 2010.

ADDRESSES:  Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to 
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the 
Office of Food Defense, Communication and Emergency Response (HFS-005), 
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug 
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send 
two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in processing 
your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic 
access to the draft guidance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye Feldstein, Center for Food Safety 
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-005), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2428.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On September 27, 2007, the President signed into law the Food and 
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). This law amends the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) by creating a new 
section 417 (21 U.S.C. 350f), Reportable Food Registry. Section 417 of 
the act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the 
Secretary) to establish within FDA a Reportable Food Registry. The 
congressionally-identified purpose of the Reportable Food Registry is 
to provide a ``reliable mechanism to track patterns of adulteration in 
food [which] would support efforts by the Food and Drug Administration 
to target limited inspection resources to protect the public health'' 
(Pubic Law 110-085, section 1005(a)(4)). The Secretary has delegated to 
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs the responsibility for administering 
the act, including section 417. To further the development of the 
Reportable Food Registry, section 417 of the act requires FDA to 
establish an electronic portal by which instances of reportable food 
must be submitted to FDA by responsible parties and may be submitted by 
public health officials. After receipt of reports through the 
electronic portal, FDA is required to review and assess the information 
submitted for purposes of identifying reportable food, submitting 
entries to the Reportable Food Registry, issuing an alert or 
notification as FDA deems necessary, and exercising other existing food 
safety authorities under the act to protect the public health. The 
requirements under the Reportable Food Registry became effective on 
September 8, 2009.
    In the Federal Register of June 11, 2009, FDA announced the 
availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Questions and Answers 
Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and 
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007'' and gave interested 
parties an opportunity to submit comments by July 27, 2009 (74 FR 
27803). The agency reviewed and evaluated these comments and issued a 
final guidance on September 9, 2009 (74 FR 46434). This draft guidance 
is the second edition of that guidance entitled ``Questions and Answers 
Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and 
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2)'' and responds 
to inquiries that the agency has received through its Reportable Food 
Registry help desk and/or by other means since the implementation of 
the Reportable Food Registry on September 8, 2009, and informs industry 
about the new Safety Reporting Portal. The Safety Reporting Portal is a 
joint FDA-National Institutes of Health (NIH) system that facilitates 
the process of reporting several categories of safety information to 
the FDA and the NIH. As of May 24, 2010, the Reportable Food electronic 
portal will be a part of the Safety Reporting Portal.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good 
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when 
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on the topics 
discussed. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person 
and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternate approach 
may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the 
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This guidance contains information collection provisions that are 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The 
collections of information in this guidance were approved under OMB 
control numbers 0910-0643 and 0910-0645. This guidance also refers to 
previously approved collections of information found in FDA 
regulations. The collection of information in 21 CFR 7.46 has been 
approved under OMB control number 0910-0249.

III. Request for Comments

    In addition, although the industry is encouraged to submit comments 
regarding any of the requirements under the Reportable Food Registry, 
the agency is seeking comments specifically with regard to the meaning 
of the word ``transfer'' as it appears in section 417(d)(2)(B) of the 
act. The meaning of the word ``transfer'' in this context was discussed 
in Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and Answer numbers 27 and 28, 
and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at Question and Answer numbers E.4 
and E.5.
    Section 417(d)(2) of the act provides an exemption from the 
requirement that a responsible party submit a reportable food report. 
In order for the exemption to apply, the adulteration must have 
originated with the responsible party, the responsible party must have 
detected the adulteration ``prior to any transfer to another person'' 
of the article of food, and the responsible party must have corrected 
the adulteration or destroyed the food. However, Congress did not 
provide a definition for the term ``transfer'' as it is used in section 
417(d)(2)(B) of the act. In Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and 
Answer numbers 27 and 28, and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at 
Question and Answer numbers E.4 and E.5, FDA said that a transfer to 
another person occurs when the responsible person releases the food to 
another person. In this document, FDA is asking for comment on whether 
this interpretation of the term ``transfer'' is appropriate, and if 
not,

[[Page 29352]]

what other interpretations of the term ``transfer'' as it is used in 
section 417(d)(B)(2) of the act would be more appropriate. 
Specifically, we are requesting comment on whether the interpretation 
of the term ``transfer'' should be dependent upon possession of the 
food, whether the interpretation should be dependent on ownership of 
the food, or whether there are other interpretations we should 
consider, such as a combination of possession and/or ownership.

IV. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this 
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no 
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify 
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets 
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

V. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance 
at https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 19, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-12456 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.