Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2); Availability, 29350-29352 [2010-12456]
Download as PDF
29350
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning
Surveillance System (HHLPSS)—New—
National Center for Environmental
Health (NCEH) and Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR)/Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The overarching goal of the Healthy
Homes and Lead Poisoning Surveillance
System (HHLPSS) is to establish
Healthy Homes Surveillance Systems at
the state and national levels. Currently,
40 state and local Childhood Lead
Poisoning Prevention Programs (CLPPP)
report information (e.g., presence of lead
paint, age of housing, and type of
housing) to CDC via the National Blood
Lead Surveillance System (NBLSS)
(OMB No. 0920–0337, exp. 1/31/2012).
The addition of a new panel of housing
questions would help to provide a more
comprehensive picture of housing stock
in the United States and potentially
modifiable risk factors.
The objectives for developing this
system are two-fold. First, the program
would like to use surveillance data to
estimate the extent of housing-related
injuries and asthma. This is important
because it will allow the program to
systematically track the management
and follow-up of those residents with
these health outcomes.
The next objective for the
development of this system is to
examine potential housing-related risk
factors. Childhood lead poisoning is just
one of many adverse health conditions
that are related to common housing
deficiencies. Multiple hazards in
housing, e.g., mold, vermin, radon and
the lack of safety devices, continue to
adversely affect the health of residents.
It is in the interest of public health to
expand from a single focus on lead
poisoning prevention to a coordinated,
comprehensive, and systematic
approach to eliminating multiple
housing-related health hazards.
HHLPSS builds upon previous efforts
by the NBLSS. While the earlier NBLSS
was focused on homes of children less
than six years old, the new HHLPSS,
upon approval, will replace the NBLSS
and will enable flexibility to evaluate all
homes, regardless of the presence of
children < age 6 years.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Respondents
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs.)
Total burden
hours
State and Local Health Departments for Child Surveillance ...........................
40
4
4
640
........................
........................
........................
640
Total ..........................................................................................................
Carol Walker,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer,Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–12538 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Disease, Disability, and Injury
Prevention and Control Special
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Miner Safety
and Health Training—Western United
States, Request for Application (RFA)
OH10–001, Initial Review
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC),
announces the aforementioned meeting:
Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.–5 p.m., June 15,
2010 (Closed).
Place: Hyatt Regency Pittsburgh
International Airport, 1111 Airport
Boulevard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15231.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Status: The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with provisions set
forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5,
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director,
Management Analysis and Services Office,
CDC, pursuant to Section 10(d) of Public Law
92–463.
Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will
include the initial review, discussion, and
evaluation of applications received in
response to ‘‘Miner Safety and Health
Training Program—Western United States,
RFA OH10–001.’’
Agenda items are subject to change as
priorities dictate.
Contact Person For More Information: S.
Price Connor, PhD, Scientific Review Officer,
Office of Extramural Programs, CDC, 1600
Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E–74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30333, Telephone (404) 498–2511.
The Director, Management Analysis and
Services Office has been delegated the
authority to sign Federal Register notices
pertaining to announcements of meetings and
other committee management activities for
both CDC and the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.
PO 00000
Dated: May 18, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010–12564 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–D–0260]
Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions
and Answers Regarding the
Reportable Food Registry as
Established by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Edition 2); Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability and
request for comments.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance entitled
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
‘‘Questions and Answers Regarding the
Reportable Food Registry as Established
by the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2).’’
The draft guidance provides information
to the industry in complying with the
Reportable Food Registry requirements
prescribed by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA). Further, the draft
guidance addresses inquiries that the
agency has received through its
Reportable Food Registry help desk and/
or by other means since the
implementation of the Reportable Food
Registry on September 8, 2009, and
provides information on the new Safety
Reporting Portal. The agency is also
seeking comments from industry on the
Reportable Food Registry requirements,
and specifically on the issue of
‘‘transfer’’ as discussed in the current
Edition 1, and draft Edition 2 guidance.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comments on the draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
electronic or written comments on the
draft guidance by July 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the draft guidance to
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments on the draft guidance
to the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
written requests for single copies of the
draft guidance to the Office of Food
Defense, Communication and
Emergency Response (HFS–005), Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition,
Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD
20740. Send two self-addressed
adhesive labels to assist that office in
processing your request. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye
Feldstein, Center for Food Safety and
Applied Nutrition (HFS–005), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301–
436–2428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 27, 2007, the President
signed into law the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (FDAAA). This law amends the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the act) by creating a new section 417
(21 U.S.C. 350f), Reportable Food
Registry. Section 417 of the act requires
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (the Secretary) to establish
within FDA a Reportable Food Registry.
The congressionally-identified purpose
of the Reportable Food Registry is to
provide a ‘‘reliable mechanism to track
patterns of adulteration in food [which]
would support efforts by the Food and
Drug Administration to target limited
inspection resources to protect the
public health’’ (Pubic Law 110–085,
section 1005(a)(4)). The Secretary has
delegated to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs the responsibility for
administering the act, including section
417. To further the development of the
Reportable Food Registry, section 417 of
the act requires FDA to establish an
electronic portal by which instances of
reportable food must be submitted to
FDA by responsible parties and may be
submitted by public health officials.
After receipt of reports through the
electronic portal, FDA is required to
review and assess the information
submitted for purposes of identifying
reportable food, submitting entries to
the Reportable Food Registry, issuing an
alert or notification as FDA deems
necessary, and exercising other existing
food safety authorities under the act to
protect the public health. The
requirements under the Reportable Food
Registry became effective on September
8, 2009.
In the Federal Register of June 11,
2009, FDA announced the availability of
a draft guidance entitled ‘‘Questions and
Answers Regarding the Reportable Food
Registry as Established by the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007’’ and gave interested parties an
opportunity to submit comments by July
27, 2009 (74 FR 27803). The agency
reviewed and evaluated these comments
and issued a final guidance on
September 9, 2009 (74 FR 46434). This
draft guidance is the second edition of
that guidance entitled ‘‘Questions and
Answers Regarding the Reportable Food
Registry as Established by the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act
of 2007 (Edition 2)’’ and responds to
inquiries that the agency has received
through its Reportable Food Registry
help desk and/or by other means since
the implementation of the Reportable
Food Registry on September 8, 2009,
and informs industry about the new
Safety Reporting Portal. The Safety
Reporting Portal is a joint FDA-National
Institutes of Health (NIH) system that
facilitates the process of reporting
several categories of safety information
to the FDA and the NIH. As of May 24,
2010, the Reportable Food electronic
portal will be a part of the Safety
Reporting Portal.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29351
This draft guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The draft guidance, when finalized, will
represent the agency’s current thinking
on the topics discussed. It does not
create or confer any rights for or on any
person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternate
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance contains information
collection provisions that are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
this guidance were approved under
OMB control numbers 0910–0643 and
0910–0645. This guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
The collection of information in 21 CFR
7.46 has been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0249.
III. Request for Comments
In addition, although the industry is
encouraged to submit comments
regarding any of the requirements under
the Reportable Food Registry, the
agency is seeking comments specifically
with regard to the meaning of the word
‘‘transfer’’ as it appears in section
417(d)(2)(B) of the act. The meaning of
the word ‘‘transfer’’ in this context was
discussed in Edition 1 of the guidance
at Question and Answer numbers 27
and 28, and in the draft Edition 2
guidance at Question and Answer
numbers E.4 and E.5.
Section 417(d)(2) of the act provides
an exemption from the requirement that
a responsible party submit a reportable
food report. In order for the exemption
to apply, the adulteration must have
originated with the responsible party,
the responsible party must have
detected the adulteration ‘‘prior to any
transfer to another person’’ of the article
of food, and the responsible party must
have corrected the adulteration or
destroyed the food. However, Congress
did not provide a definition for the term
‘‘transfer’’ as it is used in section
417(d)(2)(B) of the act. In Edition 1 of
the guidance at Question and Answer
numbers 27 and 28, and in the draft
Edition 2 guidance at Question and
Answer numbers E.4 and E.5, FDA said
that a transfer to another person occurs
when the responsible person releases
the food to another person. In this
document, FDA is asking for comment
on whether this interpretation of the
term ‘‘transfer’’ is appropriate, and if not,
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
29352
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 100 / Tuesday, May 25, 2010 / Notices
what other interpretations of the term
‘‘transfer’’ as it is used in section
417(d)(B)(2) of the act would be more
appropriate. Specifically, we are
requesting comment on whether the
interpretation of the term ‘‘transfer’’
should be dependent upon possession
of the food, whether the interpretation
should be dependent on ownership of
the food, or whether there are other
interpretations we should consider,
such as a combination of possession
and/or ownership.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft guidance at https://
www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 19, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy,
Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010–12456 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–D–0241]
Draft Guidance for Industry on Data
Elements for Submission of Veterinary
Adverse Event Reports to the Center
for Veterinary Medicine; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for
industry #188 entitled ‘‘Data Elements
for Submission of Veterinary Adverse
Event Reports to the Center for
Veterinary Medicine.’’ The purpose of
this draft guidance is to assist sponsors
or non-applicants with filling out form
FDA 1932, ‘‘Veterinary Adverse Drug
Reaction, Lack of Effectiveness, Product
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:11 May 24, 2010
Jkt 220001
Defect Report,’’ as required by FDA
regulations.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance before it begins work on the
final version of the guidance, submit
written or electronic comments on the
draft guidance by August 9, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Communications Staff (HFV–12), Center
for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855. Send one selfaddressed adhesive label to assist that
office in processing your requests. See
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the draft
guidance.
Submit electronic comments on the
draft guidance to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the draft guidance to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Post, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–210), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–9191,
email: Lynn.Post@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FDA is announcing the availability of
a draft guidance for industry #188
entitled ‘‘Data Elements for Submission
of Veterinary Adverse Event Reports to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine.’’
The purpose of this draft guidance is to
assist sponsors or non-applicants with
filling out Form FDA 1932, in both
paper and electronic format. Section
512(l) of the Federal Food, Drug and
Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
360b(l)) and § 514.80(b) (21 CFR
514.80(b)) require applicants of
approved new animal drug applications
(NADAs) and approved abbreviated new
animal drug applications (ANADAs) to
report adverse drug experiences and
product/manufacturing defects.
This continuous monitoring of
approved NADAs and ANADAs affords
the primary means by which FDA
obtains information regarding potential
problems with the safety and efficacy of
marketed approved new animal drugs as
well as potential product/manufacturing
problems. Post-approval marketing
surveillance is important because data
previously submitted to FDA may no
longer be adequate, as animal drug
effects can change over time and less
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
apparent effects may take years to
manifest. An applicant must report
adverse drug experiences and product/
manufacturing defects on Form FDA
1932, ‘‘Veterinary Adverse Drug
Reaction, Lack of Effectiveness, Product
Defect Report.’’
II. Significance of Guidance
This level 1 draft guidance is being
issued consistent with FDA’s good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR
10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency’s
current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This draft guidance refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
These collections of information are
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The collections
of information in section 512(l) of the
act and § 514.80 have been approved
under OMB Control No. 0910–0645.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written
comments regarding this document. It is
only necessary to send one set of
comments. It is no longer necessary to
send two copies of mailed comments.
Identify comments with the docket
number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft guidance at either
https://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/
default.htm or https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 19, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy,
Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010–12454 Filed 5–24–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 100 (Tuesday, May 25, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29350-29352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12456]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0260]
Draft Guidance for Industry: Questions and Answers Regarding the
Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2); Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of availability and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance entitled
[[Page 29351]]
``Questions and Answers Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as
Established by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007
(Edition 2).'' The draft guidance provides information to the industry
in complying with the Reportable Food Registry requirements prescribed
by the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA).
Further, the draft guidance addresses inquiries that the agency has
received through its Reportable Food Registry help desk and/or by other
means since the implementation of the Reportable Food Registry on
September 8, 2009, and provides information on the new Safety Reporting
Portal. The agency is also seeking comments from industry on the
Reportable Food Registry requirements, and specifically on the issue of
``transfer'' as discussed in the current Edition 1, and draft Edition 2
guidance.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comments on
the draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit electronic or written comments on the draft guidance
by July 26, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the draft guidance to
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to the
Office of Food Defense, Communication and Emergency Response (HFS-005),
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send
two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in processing
your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye Feldstein, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-005), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 301-436-2428.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On September 27, 2007, the President signed into law the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA). This law amends the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) by creating a new
section 417 (21 U.S.C. 350f), Reportable Food Registry. Section 417 of
the act requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the
Secretary) to establish within FDA a Reportable Food Registry. The
congressionally-identified purpose of the Reportable Food Registry is
to provide a ``reliable mechanism to track patterns of adulteration in
food [which] would support efforts by the Food and Drug Administration
to target limited inspection resources to protect the public health''
(Pubic Law 110-085, section 1005(a)(4)). The Secretary has delegated to
the Commissioner of Food and Drugs the responsibility for administering
the act, including section 417. To further the development of the
Reportable Food Registry, section 417 of the act requires FDA to
establish an electronic portal by which instances of reportable food
must be submitted to FDA by responsible parties and may be submitted by
public health officials. After receipt of reports through the
electronic portal, FDA is required to review and assess the information
submitted for purposes of identifying reportable food, submitting
entries to the Reportable Food Registry, issuing an alert or
notification as FDA deems necessary, and exercising other existing food
safety authorities under the act to protect the public health. The
requirements under the Reportable Food Registry became effective on
September 8, 2009.
In the Federal Register of June 11, 2009, FDA announced the
availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Questions and Answers
Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007'' and gave interested
parties an opportunity to submit comments by July 27, 2009 (74 FR
27803). The agency reviewed and evaluated these comments and issued a
final guidance on September 9, 2009 (74 FR 46434). This draft guidance
is the second edition of that guidance entitled ``Questions and Answers
Regarding the Reportable Food Registry as Established by the Food and
Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (Edition 2)'' and responds
to inquiries that the agency has received through its Reportable Food
Registry help desk and/or by other means since the implementation of
the Reportable Food Registry on September 8, 2009, and informs industry
about the new Safety Reporting Portal. The Safety Reporting Portal is a
joint FDA-National Institutes of Health (NIH) system that facilitates
the process of reporting several categories of safety information to
the FDA and the NIH. As of May 24, 2010, the Reportable Food electronic
portal will be a part of the Safety Reporting Portal.
This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on the topics
discussed. It does not create or confer any rights for or on any person
and does not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternate approach
may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This guidance contains information collection provisions that are
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in this guidance were approved under OMB
control numbers 0910-0643 and 0910-0645. This guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of information found in FDA
regulations. The collection of information in 21 CFR 7.46 has been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0249.
III. Request for Comments
In addition, although the industry is encouraged to submit comments
regarding any of the requirements under the Reportable Food Registry,
the agency is seeking comments specifically with regard to the meaning
of the word ``transfer'' as it appears in section 417(d)(2)(B) of the
act. The meaning of the word ``transfer'' in this context was discussed
in Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and Answer numbers 27 and 28,
and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at Question and Answer numbers E.4
and E.5.
Section 417(d)(2) of the act provides an exemption from the
requirement that a responsible party submit a reportable food report.
In order for the exemption to apply, the adulteration must have
originated with the responsible party, the responsible party must have
detected the adulteration ``prior to any transfer to another person''
of the article of food, and the responsible party must have corrected
the adulteration or destroyed the food. However, Congress did not
provide a definition for the term ``transfer'' as it is used in section
417(d)(2)(B) of the act. In Edition 1 of the guidance at Question and
Answer numbers 27 and 28, and in the draft Edition 2 guidance at
Question and Answer numbers E.4 and E.5, FDA said that a transfer to
another person occurs when the responsible person releases the food to
another person. In this document, FDA is asking for comment on whether
this interpretation of the term ``transfer'' is appropriate, and if
not,
[[Page 29352]]
what other interpretations of the term ``transfer'' as it is used in
section 417(d)(B)(2) of the act would be more appropriate.
Specifically, we are requesting comment on whether the interpretation
of the term ``transfer'' should be dependent upon possession of the
food, whether the interpretation should be dependent on ownership of
the food, or whether there are other interpretations we should
consider, such as a combination of possession and/or ownership.
IV. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
V. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance
at https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://www.regulations.gov.
Dated: May 19, 2010.
David Dorsey,
Acting Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning and Budget.
[FR Doc. 2010-12456 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S